Skip to main content Accesibility Help
Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 129
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fernandes, Jorge M Riera, Pedro and Cantú, Francisco 2019. The Politics of Committee Chairs Assignment in Ireland and Spain. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 72, Issue. 1, p. 182.

    Volpi, Elisa 2019. Ideology and Party Switching: A Comparison of 12 West European Countries. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 72, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Merkley, Eric 2019. Learning from Divided Parties? Legislator Dissent as a Cue for Opinion Formation. Parliamentary Affairs,

    Vandeleene, Audrey and De Winter, Lieven 2019. Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. p. 1.

    Dodeigne, Jérémy Meulewaeter, Conrad and Lesschaeve, Christophe 2019. Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. p. 215.

    Herron, Erik S. Fitzpatrick, Brian and Palamarenko, Maksym 2019. The practice and implications of legislative proxy voting in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    Fernandes, Jorge M. Leston-Bandeira, Cristina and Schwemmer, Carsten 2018. Election proximity and representation focus in party-constrained environments. Party Politics, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 674.

    Schumacher, Gijs and Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian 2018. Party performance explains disagreement between politicians and their parties. West European Politics, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 329.

    Sieberer, Ulrich Saalfeld, Thomas Ohmura, Tamaki Bergmann, Henning and Bailer, Stefanie 2018. Roll-Call Votes in the German Bundestag: A New Dataset, 1949–2013. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    Däubler, Thomas 2018. National policy for local reasons: how MPs represent party and geographical constituency through initiatives on social security. Acta Politica,

    Fonck, Daan and Reykers, Yf 2018. Parliamentarisation as a Two-Way Process: Explaining Prior Parliamentary Consultation for Military Interventions. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 71, Issue. 3, p. 674.

    Papp, Zsófia 2018. Do Personalised Campaigns Hint at Legislator Activities? The (Lacking) Relationship Between Campaigns and Legislator Behaviour in Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 71, Issue. 4, p. 908.

    Chartash, David Caruana, Nicholas J Dickinson, Markus and Stephenson, Laura B 2018. When the team’s jersey is what matters. Party Politics, p. 135406881879519.

    Alemán, Eduardo Micozzi, Juan Pablo Pinto, Pablo M. and Saiegh, Sebastian 2018. Disentangling the Role of Ideology and Partisanship in Legislative Voting: Evidence from Argentina. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 245.

    Fernandes, Jorge M. Goplerud, Max and Won, Miguel 2018. Legislative Bellwethers: The Role of Committee Membership in Parliamentary Debate. Legislative Studies Quarterly,

    Collier, Cheryl N and Raney, Tracey 2018. Understanding Sexism and Sexual Harassment in Politics: A Comparison of Westminster Parliaments in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 432.

    Bevan, Shaun and Greene, Zachary 2018. Cross-national partisan effects on agenda stability. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 586.

    Peterson, Andrew and Spirling, Arthur 2018. Classification Accuracy as a Substantive Quantity of Interest: Measuring Polarization in Westminster Systems. Political Analysis, Vol. 26, Issue. 01, p. 120.

    Bäck, Hanna and Debus, Marc 2018. Representing the Region on the Floor: Socioeconomic Characteristics of Electoral Districts and Legislative Speechmaking. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 73.

    Cuddy, Andrew 2018. When Does Partisanship Become Excessive?. Representation, Vol. 54, Issue. 3, p. 261.


Book description

One of the chief tasks facing political leaders is to build and maintain unity within their parties. This text examines the relationship between party leaders and Members of Parliament in Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, showing how the two sides interact and sometimes clash. Christopher J. Kam demonstrates how incentives for MPs to dissent from their parties have been amplified by a process of partisan dealignment that has created electorates of non-partisan voters who reward shows of political independence. Party leaders therefore rely on a mixture of strategies to offset these electoral pressures, from offering MPs advancement to threatening discipline, and ultimately relying on a long-run process of socialization to temper their MPs' dissension. Kam reveals the underlying structure of party unity in modern Westminster parliamentary politics, and drives home the point that social norms and socialization reinforce rather than displace appeals to MPs' self-interest.


Review of the hardback:‘Party discipline is a key element in Westminster systems and Kam makes a major step forward in formalizing our understanding of this. An exceedingly thoughtful book.’

Shaun Bowler - University of California, Riverside

Review of the hardback:‘This is a landmark text in the study of comparative parliamentary behaviour. It is the first book to develop and test a micro-level theory of internal party politics in parliaments using roll-call data from several parliaments. If Kam is right, that parliamentary parties are no-longer unitary actors and that party cohesion is fragile and conditional, this calls into question much of the established wisdom about how parliamentary government works.’

Simon Hix - Professor of European and Comparative Politics, London School of Economics and Political Science

Review of the hardback:‘This is a major work. It brings the study of dissent in Westminster-style parliaments from anecdotage to data, and from data to analysis.’

Iain McLean - Professor of Politics, Oxford University

Review of the hardback:'This well-written book combines detailed descriptions with statistical analyses, making it an asset for scholars and practitioners of legislative behaviour.'

Source: Political Studies Review

'… a very important contribution to the study of legislatures. It is also an excellent example of the recent theoretical and empirical advances in the study of parliamentary politics in the UK … Kam’s …empirical analyses are careful and convincing. His use of particular episodes of parliamentary life to test his hypotheses is particularly engaging. In addition, [his] comparative approach is one of the great strengths of his book; by harnessing evidence from various contexts, he can provide a firm footing for his theoretical arguments … [this] book fits well into [the] revival of interest in parliaments in Westminster systems and deserves to be widely read by anyone wishing to understand how legislatures work. Most importantly, the book suggests new avenues for further research into the activities of MPs and how voters respond to them.'

Markus Wagner Source: Parliamentary Affairs

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Newspaper sources
Daily Telegraph. 2 November 2002. ‘Tory Leader Gives MPs “Free Vote” on Gay Adoption’, 17.
The Economist. 7 November 2002. ‘Where Did It All Go Wrong?’, 59.
The Economist. 18 March 2003. ‘Blair Sticks to His Guns’,
Globe and Mail. 24 November 1994. ‘Internal Party Fight over Bill Sputters. Solidarity Reigns’, A6.
Guardian. 10 November 2005. ‘Blair Defeated on Terror Bill’,
Sydney Morning Herald. 11 May 1996. ‘Iron-bar Makes PM Blink’, 37.
Sydney Morning Herald. 22 May 1996. ‘PM Cuts Deal on Native Title’, 3.
Sydney Morning Herald. 14 June 1996. ‘Tuckey Takes an Iron-bar to “Executive Arrogance”’, 4.
Sydney Morning Herald. 11 July 1996. ‘Howard Stands Firm against Gun Crimping’, 1.
Sydney Morning Herald. 6 March 1997. ‘Howard Faces Revolt over Cut to Sugar Tariff’, 6.
Sydney Morning Herald. 20 March 1997. ‘Howard Faces Coalition Revolt over Wik Compromise Plan’, 3.
Sydney Morning Herald. 27 March 1997. ‘Dissatisfaction Mounts on the Back Benches’, 43.
Sydney Morning Herald. 23 October 1997. ‘A Show of Hands – And Then Another Liberal Rebels on Wik’, 8.
Sydney Morning Herald. 29 October 1997. ‘Libs Move to Avoid NP Split on Wik’, 3.
Sydney Morning Herald. 30 October 1997. ‘Blow to Coalition as Renegades Cross Floor over Wik’, 3.
Sydney Morning Herald. 2 December 1997. ‘Sunset Clause beyond Pale, Says Harradine’, 4.
Sydney Morning Herald. 18 June 1998. ‘Moderates Push for Wik Compromise’, 7.
Sydney Morning Herald. 4 July 1998. ‘The Dust Settles: The Painful Journey to a Deal’, 29.
The Times. 5 November 2002. ‘Challenge to Rebels Was the Mark of a Vulnerable Leader, Not a Strong One’.
Toronto Star. 6 February 1995. ‘Liberals Face Rough Ride in House. Explosive Issues Top Agenda as MPs Return to Ottawa’, A9.
Vancouver Sun. 13 June 1995. ‘Liberals Expected to Pass 3 Thorny Bills within a Week: “The Longer They Let Things Drag On the More Difficult It Would Be to Control their Backbenchers”’, A7.
Winnipeg Free Press. 15 June 1995. ‘Iftody to Rebel Again’, A1.
Data sets and computer programs
Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. British General Election Study, 2001; Cross-Section Survey [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], March 2003. SN: 4619.
Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. British Election Study, 2005: Internet Rolling Campaign Panel Data and British Parliamentary Constituency Database [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], November 2006. SN: 5496.
Erickson, Lynda. 1993. Canadian Candidate Study, 1993. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.
Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British General Election Study, 1983; Cross-Section Survey [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], 1983. SN: 2005.
Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British General Election Study, 1987; Cross-Section Survey, 2nd edn [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], April 1993. SN: 2568.
Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British Election Panel Study, 1992–1997 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], July 1998. SN: 3888.
Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., Curtice, John K., and Norris, Pippa. 1999. British General Election Cross-Section Survey, 1997 [computer file]. ICPSR version (ICPSR 2615). London: Social and Community Planning Research [producer], 1998. Colchester, Essex: ESRC Data Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999.
Jones, R., McAllister, I., and Gow, D. G.. 1996. Australian Candidate Study, 1996 (SSDA Study No. 944). Canberra: Social Science Data Archives, The Australian National University.
McAllister, I., Jones, R.Denemark, D., and Gow, D. G.. 1994. Australian Candidate Study, 1993 (SSDA Study No. 764). Canberra: Social Science Data Archives, The Australian National University.
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1992. British Candidate Study, 1992. Available online at:
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1997. British Representation Study, 1997. Available online at:
Norton, Philip and Cowley, Philip. 1999. Dissension in the House of Commons 1992–1997 Codebook. UK Data Archive. SN: 4055
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. ‘CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results’, version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 June,
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Catt, Helena, Miller, Raymond, and Lamare, Jim. 1994. 1992 New Zealand Election Survey [computer file]. Auckland: Department of Political Science, University of Auckland. Available online at
Parliamentary sources
Parliamentary Debates of the Commonwealth of Australia (House of Representatives). Various volumes. Canberra: The House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia.
Parliamentary Debates of the Commonwealth of Australia (Senate). Various volumes. Canberra: The Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia.
Annotated Standing Orders of the House of Commons. 1989. Ottawa: The House of Commons of Canada.
Parliamentary Debates of the House of Commons of Canada. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Available online at
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Various Volumes. Wellington, NZ: House of Representatives.
Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. 2005. Wellington, NZ: House of Representatives.
Parliamentary Debates of the House of Commons (Hansard). Sixth series. Various volumes. London: HMSO.
Monographs and journal articles
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
Alt, James E. 1984. ‘Dealignment and the Dynamics of Partisanship in Britain’, in Dalton, Russell, Flanagan, Scott, and Beck, Paul Allen (eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton University Press, 298–329.
Anagnoson, J. Theodore. 1987. ‘Does Constituency Work Have an Electoral Impact? The Case of New Zealand MPs’, Political Science, 39: 105–18.
Asher, Herbert B. 1973. ‘The Learning of Legislative Norms’, American Political Science Review, 67: 499–513.
Aylott, Nicholas. 2002. ‘Let's Discuss This Later: Party Responses to Euro-Division in Scandinavia’, Party Politics, 8: 441–61.
Benedetto, Giacomo and Hix, Simon. 2007. ‘The Rejected, Dejected, and the Ejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001–05 British House of Commons’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 755–81.
Bean, Clive. 1990. ‘The Personal Vote in Australian Elections’, Political Studies, 38: 253–68.
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 634–47.
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2001. ‘Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Comment on Green, Yoon, and Kim’, International Organizations, 55: 487–95.
Beer, Samuel H. 1965. Modern British Politics. London: Faber and Faber.
Berkeley, Humphrey. 1972. Crossing the Floor. London: Allen and Unwin.
Bowler, Shaun. 2000. ‘Parties in Legislatures: Two Competing Explanations’, in Dalton, Russell and Wattenberg, Martin (eds.), Parties without Partisans. Oxford University Press, 157–79.
Bown, Francis. 1990. ‘The Defeat of the Shops Bill, 1986’, in Rush, Michael (ed.), Parliament and Pressure Politics. Oxford University Press, 213–33.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R. and Golder, Matthew. 2005. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14: 63–82.
Buck, Philip. 1963. ‘The Early Start toward Cabinet Office, 1918–55’, Western Political Quarterly, 16: 624–32.
Butler, David and Butler, Gareth. 1994. British Political Facts, 1900–1994. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Butler, David and Kavanagh, Denis. 1997. The British General Election of 1997. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Butler, David and E. Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. London: Macmillan.
Butt, Ronald. 1967. The Power of Parliament. London: Constable.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1960. The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2002. ‘Canada's 19th Century Cadre Parties at the Millennium’, in Webb, Paul, Farrell, David, and Holliday, Ian (eds.), Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 345–79.
Clarke, Harold D., Ho, Karl, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 2000. ‘Major's Lesser (Not Minor) Effects: Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support in Britain Since 1979’, Electoral Studies, 18: 255–74.
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul F.. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford University Press.
Converse, Philip. 1964. ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in Apter, David E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press, 206–61.
Cook, Robin. 2003. The Point of Departure. London: Simon & Schuster.
Cowley, Philip. 1999. ‘Rebels and Rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992 Parliament’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1: 84–105.
Cowley, Philip. 2002. Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under Blair. London: Politico's.
Cowley, Philip. 2005. The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority. London: Politico's.
Cowley, Philip and Norton, Philip. 1996. ‘Are Conservative MPs Revolting?’, Research Paper in Legislative Studies, 2/96. Hull: Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull.
Cowley, Philip and Norton, Philip, with Stuart, Mark and Bailey, Matthew. 1996. ‘Blair's Bastards: Discontent within the Parliamentary Labour Party’, Research Paper in Legislative Studies, 1/96. Hull: Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull.
Cowley, Philip and Stuart, Mark. 2004. ‘Still Causing Trouble: The Conservative Parliamentary Party’, Political Quarterly 75: 356–61.
Cowley, Philip and Stuart, Mark. 2005. ‘Government Defeated Twice on Terrorism Bill’, briefing paper. Available online at
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 1999. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 2000. ‘On the Effects of Legislative Rules’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 169–92.
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.
Crewe, Ivor and King, Anthony. 1994. ‘Did Major Win? Did Kinnock Lose? Leadership Effects in the 1992 Election’, in Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John (eds.), Labour's Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 125–48.
Crewe, Ivor, Sarlvik, Bo, and Alt, James E. 1977. ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–1974’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 129–90.
Crowe, Edward W. 1983. ‘Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons’, Journal of Politics, 45: 487–510.
Crowe, Edward W. 1986. ‘The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 161–85.
Dalton, Russell J. 1993. Politics in Germany. New York: HarperCollins.
Dalton, Russell J. 2000. ‘The Decline of Party Identification’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 19–36.
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment. Princeton University Press.
Denemark, David. 2000. ‘Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-level Grants’, Journal of Politics, 62: 896–915.
Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. ‘Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure’, American Political Science Review, 92: 611–22.
Docherty, David. 1997. Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa: Life in the House of Commons. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Döring, Herbert (ed.). 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper-Row.
Duverger, Maurice. 1962. Political Parties, trans. Barbara, and North, Robert. New York: Wiley.
Epstein, David, Brady, David, Kawato, Sadafumi, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1997. ‘A Comparative Approach to Legislative Organization: Careerism and Seniority in the United States and Japan’, American Journal of Political Science, 41: 965–98.
Erickson, Lynda. 1997. ‘Might More Women Make a Difference? Gender, Party and Ideology among Parliamentary Candidates’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30: 663–88.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ferejohn, John A. and Gaines, Brian. 1991. ‘The Personal Vote in Canada’, in Bakvis, Herman (ed.), Representation, Integration, and Political Parties in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 275–302.
Franklin, Mark, Baxter, Alison, and Jordan, Margaret. 1986. ‘Who Were the Rebels? Dissent in the House of Commons, 1970–1974’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 143–59.
Franks, C. E. S. 1987. The Parliament of Canada. University of Toronto Press.
Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. ‘In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations’, American Political Science Review, 26: 797–833.
Gabel, Matthew J. and Huber, John. 2000. ‘Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left–Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 94–103.
Gaines, Brian J. and Garrett, Geoffrey. 1993. ‘The Calculus of Dissent: Party Discipline in the British Labour Government, 1974–79’, Political Behavior, 15: 113–35.
Golder, Matt. 2003. ‘Electoral Institutions, Unemployment and Extreme Right Parties: A Correction’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 525–34.
Green, Donald P., Kim, Soo Yeon, and Yoon, David H.. 2001. ‘Dirty Pool’, International Organization, 55: 441–468.
Hager, Gregory and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 2000. ‘Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 75–99.
Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., and Curtice, John K.. 1985. How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon.
Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., and Curtice, John K.. 2001. The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices. Oxford University Press.
Valerie, Heitshusen, Young, Garry, and Wood, David M.. 2005. ‘Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom’, American Journal of Political Science, 49: 32–45.
Hine, David. 1993. Governing Italy: The Politics of Bargained Pluralism. Oxford University Press.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hixon, William and Wicks, Aaron E.. 2000. ‘Measuring Congressional Support for the President: Evaluating the NOMINATE Scores’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30: 186–93.
Hobby, M. 1987. ‘The Crack of the Whips, Party Cohesion and Institutional Consensus in the New Zealand Parliament, 1936–85’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
Huber, John D. 1996a. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, John D. 1996b. ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 90: 269–82.
Huber, John D. and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. ‘Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies’, Party Politics, 1: 73–111.
Irvine, W. P. 1982. ‘Does the Candidate Make a Difference? The Macro-politics and Micro-politics of Getting Elected’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 15: 755–82.
Jackson, John and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. ‘Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes’, American Journal of Political Science, 36: 805–23.
Jackson, K. 1987. The Dilemma of Parliament. Auckland: Allen and Unwin.
Jackson, R. 1968. Rebels and Whips: An Analysis of Dissension, Discipline, and Cohesion in British Political Parties. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Jaensch, Dean. 1992. The Politics of Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan Australia.
Jensen, Torben K. 2000. ‘Party Cohesion’, in Esaiasson, Peter and Heider, Knut (eds.), Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 210–36.
Kam, Christopher. 2002. ‘Parliaments, Parties, and MPs: A Comparative Perspective on Backbench Dissent, Party Discipline, and Intra-party Politics’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Kam, Christopher and Indridason, Indridi. 2005. ‘The Timing of Cabinet Reshuffles in Five Westminster Parliamentary Systems’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30: 327–63.
Katz, Richard S. 2001. ‘The Problem of Candidate Selection’, Party Politics, 7: 277–96.
King, Anthony. 1981. ‘The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences’, British Journal of Political Science, 11: 249–285.
King, Gary. 1988. ‘Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model’, American Journal of Political Science, 32: 838–63.
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. and McLemore, Lelan. 1977. ‘Perceptual and Affective Components of Legislative Norms: A Social-Psychological Analysis of Congruity’, Journal of Politics, 39: 685–711.
Kornberg, Alan. 1967. Canadian Legislative Behaviour: A Study of the 25th Parliament. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. ‘Where's the Party?’, British Journal of Political Science, 23: 235–66.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1999. ‘Paradoxes of Parties in Congress’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14: 31–64.
Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R.. 1979. ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 23: 3–27.
Laver, Michael. 1999. ‘Divided Parties, Divided Government’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14: 5–30.
Laver, Michael and Hunt, Ben. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.
Laws, Michael. 1998. The Demon Profession. Auckland: HarperCollins.
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. ‘The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research’, Comparative Political Studies, 8: 158–77.
Londregan, John. 1999. ‘Estimating Legislators’ Ideal Points’, Political Analysis, 8: 38–56.
Lucy, Richard. 1985. The Australian Form of Government. Melbourne: Macmillan.
McAllister, Ian. 1992. ‘Australia: Changing Social Structure, Stable Politics’, in Franklin, Mark, Mackie, Thomas T., and Valen, Henry (eds.), Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge University Press, 61–82.
McAllister, Ian. 2006. ‘Political Parties in Australia: Party Stability in a Utilitarian Society’, in Webb, Paul, Farrell, David, and Holliday, Ian (eds.), Political Parties at the Millennium: Adaptation and Decline in Democratic Societies. Oxford University Press, 379–408.
McAllister, Ian and T. Studlar, Donley. 2000. ‘Conservative Euroscepticism and the Referendum Party in the 1997 British General Election’, Party Politics, 6: 359–71.
MacDonald, Stuart Elaine. 1987. ‘Political Ambition and Attainment: A Dynamic Analysis of Parliamentary Careers’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
McSmith, Andy. 1996. Faces of Labour: The Inside Story. New York: Verso.
Major, John. 1999. John Major: The Autobiography. New York: HarperCollins.
Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 2004. ‘Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 34: 87–108.
Meng, Xiao-Li. 1994. ‘Multiple Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input’, Statistical Science, 9: 538–73.
Mershon, Carol and Heller, William. 2005. ‘Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001’, Journal of Politics, 67: 536–59.
Mezey, Michael L. 1993. ‘Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance’, in Finifter, Ada (ed.), The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in the United States and Latin America's Southern Cone. Cambridge University Press.
Mughan, Anthony. 1990. ‘Midterm Popularity and Governing Party Dissension in the House of Commons, 1959–79’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 341–58.
Anthony, Mughan, Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Scully, Roger. 1997. ‘Mapping Legislative Socialisation’, European Journal of Political Research, 32: 93–106.
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. 1999. ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neal, Nevitte, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nadeau, Richard. 2000. Unsteady State: The 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1994. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
Pippa, Norris, Vallance, Elizabeth, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1992. ‘Do Candidates Make a Difference? Gender, Race, Ideology and Incumbency’, Parliamentary Affairs, 45: 497–517.
Norton, Philip. 1975. Dissension in the House of Commons: Intra-Party Dissent in the House of Commons Division Lobbies, 1945–1974. London: MacMillan.
Norton, Philip. 1978. Conservative Dissidents. London: Temple Smith.
Norton, Philip. 1980. Dissension in the House of Commons, 1974–1979. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norton, Philip. 1981. The Commons in Perspective. New York: Longman.
Norton, Philip. 1985. ‘Behavioural Changes. Backbench Independence in the 1980s’, in Norton, Philip (ed.), Parliament in the 1980s. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Norton, Philip. 1987. ‘Dissent in the British House of Commons: Rejoinder to Franklin, Baxter, Jordan’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12: 143–52.
Norton, Philip. 2000. ‘The Individual Member in the British House of Commons: Facing Both Ways and Marching Forward’, in Longley, Lawrence D. and Hazan, Reuven Y. (eds.), The Uneasy Relationships between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. London: Frank Cass, 53–74.
Norton, Philip and Wood, David M.. 1993. Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Ozbudun, Ergun. 1970. Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Causal Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Books.
Palmer, Matthew S. R. 1995. ‘Toward an Economics of Comparative Political Organization: Examining Ministerial Responsibility’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11: 164–88.
Paltzelt, W. 2000. ‘What Can an Individual MP Do in German Parliamentary Politics?’, in Longley, L. and Hazan, R. (eds.), The Uneasy Relationship between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. London: Frank Cass, 23–52.
Patterson, Samuel. 1989. ‘Understanding the British Parliament’, Political Studies, 37: 449–62.
Charles, Pattie, Fieldhouse, Edward, and Johnston, R. J.. 1994. ‘The Price of Conscience: The Electoral Correlates and Consequences of Free Votes and Rebellions in the British House of Commons, 1987–92’, British Journal of Political Science, 24: 359–80.
Piper, J. Richard. 1991. ‘British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945–87’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16: 219–238.
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37: 391–414.
Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Inquiry. Malabar, FL: R. E. Krieger.
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 2000. ‘Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 3–23.
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. ‘The Behavior of Legislative Groups’, Political Science Quarterly, 40: 60–72.
Rubin, Donald B. 1977. ‘Formalizing Subjective Notions about the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample Surveys’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72: 538–43.
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Rubin, Donald B. 1996. ‘Multiple Imputation after 18+ Years’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91: 473–89.
Saalfeld, Thomas. 1986. ‘On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes’, in International Centre for Parliamentary Documentation, Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium. New York: Facts on File.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1991. ‘Comparing and Miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 243–57.
Sayers, Anthony M. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Schafer, J. L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1961. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Schwarz, John E. 1980. ‘Exploring a New Role in Policy Making: The British House of Commons in the 1970s’, American Political Science Review, 74: 23–37.
Searing, Donald D. 1994. Westminster's World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Searing, Donald D. and Game, Chris. 1977. ‘Horses for Courses: The Recruitment of Whips in the British House of Commons’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 361–85.
Seldon, Anthony. 2004. Blair. London: The Free Press.
Silk, Paul and Walters, Rhodri. 1987. How Parliament Works. London and New York: Longman.
Snyder, James M. and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. ‘Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 193–211.
Sowemimo, Matthew. 1996. ‘The Conservative Party and European Integration, 1988–95’, Party Politics, 2: 77–97.
Spirling, Arthur and McLean, Ian. 2007. ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the UK House of Commons’, Political Analysis, 15: 85–96.
Stanbury, William T. 1993. ‘Financing Federal Politics in Canada in an Era of Reform’, in Gunlicks, Arthur B. (ed.), Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 68–120.
Stimson, James A. 1985. ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay’, American Journal of Political Science, 29: 914–47.
Strøm, Kaare. 1986. ‘Deferred Gratification and Minority Governments in Scandinavia’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10: 583–605.
Thies, Michael F. 2000. ‘On the Primacy of Party in Government: Why Legislative Parties Can Survive Party Decline in the Electorate’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans. New York: Oxford University Press, 238–57.
Tocqueville, Alexis. 1848/1965. Democracy in America. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.
Vandoren, Peter M. 1990. ‘Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 311–39.
Vowles, Jack and Aimer, Peter. 1992. The Voters’ Vengeance: The 1990 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of the Fourth Labour Government. Auckland University Press.
Ward, Norman. 1987. Dawson's The Government of Canada, 6th edn. University of Toronto Press.
Wearing, Joseph. 1998. ‘Guns, Gays, and Gadflies: Party Dissent in the House of Commons under Mulroney and Chrétien’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Ottawa, 31 May–2 June 1998.
Webb, Paul D. 1994. ‘Centralized Parties and Decentralized Selection’, in Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (eds.), How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Willson, F. M. G. 1959. ‘The Routes of Entry of New Members of the British Cabinet 1868–1958’, Political Studies, 7: 222–32.
Willson, F. M. G. 1970. ‘Entry to the Cabinet, 1959–68’, Political Studies, 18: 236–38.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed