Skip to main content
×
Home
Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 45
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Atkinson, Michael M. Rogers, Dustin and Olfert, Sara 2016. Better Politicians: If We Pay, Will They Come?. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 361.


    Baumann, Markus 2016. Constituency Demands and Limited Supplies: Comparing Personal Issue Emphases in Co-sponsorship of Bills and Legislative Speech. Scandinavian Political Studies,


    Degner, Hanno and Leuffen, Dirk 2016. Keynes, Friedman, or Monnet? Explaining parliamentary voting behaviour on fiscal aid for euro area member states. West European Politics, p. 1.


    Godbout, Jean-François and Smaz, Monika 2016. Party development in the early decades of the Australian parliament: a new perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science, p. 1.


    Halligan, John and Reid, Richard 2016. Conflict and Consensus in Committees of the Australian Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 69, Issue. 2, p. 230.


    Hanretty, Chris Lauderdale, Benjamin E. and Vivyan, Nick 2016. Dyadic Representation in a Westminster System. Legislative Studies Quarterly,


    HELLER, WILLIAM B. KYRIACOU, ANDREAS P. and ROCA-SAGALÉS, ORIOL 2016. Institutional checks and corruption: The effect of formal agenda access on governance. European Journal of Political Research,


    Kaarbo, Juliet and Kenealy, Daniel 2016. No, prime minister: explaining the House of Commons’ vote on intervention in Syria. European Security, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 28.


    Klein, Elad and Umit, Resul 2016. The electoral connection of ministerial selection in the UK. The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 276.


    Shomer, Yael 2016. The Conditional Effect of Electoral Systems and Intraparty Candidate Selection Processes on Parties' Behavior. Legislative Studies Quarterly,


    VIVYAN, NICK and WAGNER, MARKUS 2016. House or home? Constituent preferences over legislator effort allocation. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 81.


    Willumsen, David M. and Goetz, Klaus H. 2016. Set Free? Impending Retirement and Legislative Behaviour in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, p. gsw018.


    Kirkland, Justin H. and Williams, R. Lucas 2015. Representation, neighboring districts, and party loyalty in the U.S. Congress. Public Choice, Vol. 165, Issue. 3-4, p. 263.


    Leydet, Dominique 2015. Partisan Legislatures and Democratic Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 235.


    Moscardelli, Vincent G. and McGhee, Eric 2015. Reform in the Canadian Parliament and the US Congress: Institutional Choices and Member Power. American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 226.


    Mutlu-Eren, Hande 2015. Keeping the party together. Public Choice, Vol. 164, Issue. 1-2, p. 117.


    Seddone, Antonella and Venturino, Fulvio 2015. The Partito Democratico after the 2013 elections: all change?. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 474.


    Wilson, R. Paul 2015. Minister's Caucus Advisory Committees under the Harper government. Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 227.


    Eggers, Andrew C. and Spirling, Arthur 2014. Electoral Security as a Determinant of Legislator Activity, 1832-1918: New Data and Methods for Analyzing British Political Development. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 593.


    Eggers, Andrew C. and Spirling, Arthur 2014. Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832-1915. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 873.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics
    • Online ISBN: 9780511576614
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576614
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

One of the chief tasks facing political leaders is to build and maintain unity within their parties. This text examines the relationship between party leaders and Members of Parliament in Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, showing how the two sides interact and sometimes clash. Christopher J. Kam demonstrates how incentives for MPs to dissent from their parties have been amplified by a process of partisan dealignment that has created electorates of non-partisan voters who reward shows of political independence. Party leaders therefore rely on a mixture of strategies to offset these electoral pressures, from offering MPs advancement to threatening discipline, and ultimately relying on a long-run process of socialization to temper their MPs' dissension. Kam reveals the underlying structure of party unity in modern Westminster parliamentary politics, and drives home the point that social norms and socialization reinforce rather than displace appeals to MPs' self-interest.

Reviews

Review of the hardback:‘Party discipline is a key element in Westminster systems and Kam makes a major step forward in formalizing our understanding of this. An exceedingly thoughtful book.’

Shaun Bowler - University of California, Riverside

Review of the hardback:‘This is a landmark text in the study of comparative parliamentary behaviour. It is the first book to develop and test a micro-level theory of internal party politics in parliaments using roll-call data from several parliaments. If Kam is right, that parliamentary parties are no-longer unitary actors and that party cohesion is fragile and conditional, this calls into question much of the established wisdom about how parliamentary government works.’

Simon Hix - Professor of European and Comparative Politics, London School of Economics and Political Science

Review of the hardback:‘This is a major work. It brings the study of dissent in Westminster-style parliaments from anecdotage to data, and from data to analysis.’

Iain McLean - Professor of Politics, Oxford University

Review of the hardback:'This well-written book combines detailed descriptions with statistical analyses, making it an asset for scholars and practitioners of legislative behaviour.'

Source: Political Studies Review

'… a very important contribution to the study of legislatures. It is also an excellent example of the recent theoretical and empirical advances in the study of parliamentary politics in the UK … Kam’s …empirical analyses are careful and convincing. His use of particular episodes of parliamentary life to test his hypotheses is particularly engaging. In addition, [his] comparative approach is one of the great strengths of his book; by harnessing evidence from various contexts, he can provide a firm footing for his theoretical arguments … [this] book fits well into [the] revival of interest in parliaments in Westminster systems and deserves to be widely read by anyone wishing to understand how legislatures work. Most importantly, the book suggests new avenues for further research into the activities of MPs and how voters respond to them.'

Markus Wagner Source: Parliamentary Affairs

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Anthony F. Heath , Roger M. Jowell , John K. Curtice , and Pippa Norris . 1999. British General Election Cross-Section Survey, 1997 [computer file]. ICPSR version (ICPSR 2615). London: Social and Community Planning Research [producer], 1998. Colchester, Essex: ESRC Data Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999.

John H. Aldrich 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.

J. Theodore Anagnoson . 1987. ‘Does Constituency Work Have an Electoral Impact? The Case of New Zealand MPs’, Political Science, 39: 105–18.

Herbert B. Asher 1973. ‘The Learning of Legislative Norms’, American Political Science Review, 67: 499–513.

Nicholas Aylott . 2002. ‘Let's Discuss This Later: Party Responses to Euro-Division in Scandinavia’, Party Politics, 8: 441–61.

Giacomo Benedetto and Simon Hix . 2007. ‘The Rejected, Dejected, and the Ejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001–05 British House of Commons’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 755–81.

Clive Bean . 1990. ‘The Personal Vote in Australian Elections’, Political Studies, 38: 253–68.

Nathaniel Beck and Jonathan N. Katz . 1995. ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 634–47.

Nathaniel Beck and Jonathan N. Katz . 2001. ‘Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Comment on Green, Yoon, and Kim’, International Organizations, 55: 487–95.

Thomas Brambor , William R. Clark and Matthew Golder . 2005. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14: 63–82.

Philip Buck . 1963. ‘The Early Start toward Cabinet Office, 1918–55’, Western Political Quarterly, 16: 624–32.

David Butler and Gareth Butler . 1994. British Political Facts, 1900–1994. New York: St. Martin's Press.

David Butler and Denis Kavanagh . 1997. The British General Election of 1997. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Bruce E. Cain , John A. Ferejohn , and Morris P. Fiorina . 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

R. Kenneth Carty . 2002. ‘Canada's 19th Century Cadre Parties at the Millennium’, in Paul Webb , David Farrell , and Ian Holliday (eds.), Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 345–79.

Harold D. Clarke , David Sanders , Marianne C. Stewart , and Paul F. Whiteley . 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford University Press.

Philip Cowley . 1999. ‘Rebels and Rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992 Parliament’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1: 84–105.

Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart . 2004. ‘Still Causing Trouble: The Conservative Parliamentary Party’, Political Quarterly 75: 356–61.

Gary W. Cox 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.

Gary W. Cox 2000. ‘On the Effects of Legislative Rules’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 169–92.

Gary W. Cox and Matthew McCubbins . 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.

Ivor Crewe , Bo Sarlvik , and James E Alt . 1977. ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–1974’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 129–90.

Edward W. Crowe 1983. ‘Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons’, Journal of Politics, 45: 487–510.

Edward W. Crowe 1986. ‘The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 161–85.

David Denemark . 2000. ‘Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-level Grants’, Journal of Politics, 62: 896–915.

Daniel Diermeier and Timothy J. Feddersen . 1998. ‘Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure’, American Political Science Review, 92: 611–22.

David Epstein , David Brady , Sadafumi Kawato , and Sharyn O'Halloran . 1997. ‘A Comparative Approach to Legislative Organization: Careerism and Seniority in the United States and Japan’, American Journal of Political Science, 41: 965–98.

Lynda Erickson . 1997. ‘Might More Women Make a Difference? Gender, Party and Ideology among Parliamentary Candidates’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30: 663–88.

Mark Franklin , Alison Baxter , and Margaret Jordan . 1986. ‘Who Were the Rebels? Dissent in the House of Commons, 1970–1974’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 143–59.

Robert J. Friedrich 1982. ‘In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations’, American Political Science Review, 26: 797–833.

Matthew J. Gabel and John Huber . 2000. ‘Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left–Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 94–103.

Brian J. Gaines and Geoffrey Garrett . 1993. ‘The Calculus of Dissent: Party Discipline in the British Labour Government, 1974–79’, Political Behavior, 15: 113–35.

Matt Golder . 2003. ‘Electoral Institutions, Unemployment and Extreme Right Parties: A Correction’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 525–34.

Donald P. Green , Soo Yeon Kim , and David H. Yoon . 2001. ‘Dirty Pool’, International Organization, 55: 441–468.

Anthony F. Heath , Roger M. Jowell , and John K. Curtice . 2001. The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices. Oxford University Press.

William Hixon and Aaron E. Wicks . 2000. ‘Measuring Congressional Support for the President: Evaluating the NOMINATE Scores’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30: 186–93.

John D. Huber 1996a. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. New York: Cambridge University Press.

John D. Huber 1996b. ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 90: 269–82.

John D. Huber and Ronald Inglehart . 1995. ‘Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies’, Party Politics, 1: 73–111.

W. P. Irvine 1982. ‘Does the Candidate Make a Difference? The Macro-politics and Micro-politics of Getting Elected’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 15: 755–82.

John Jackson and John W. Kingdon . 1992. ‘Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes’, American Journal of Political Science, 36: 805–23.

Dean Jaensch . 1992. The Politics of Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan Australia.

Christopher Kam and Indridi Indridason . 2005. ‘The Timing of Cabinet Reshuffles in Five Westminster Parliamentary Systems’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30: 327–63.

Richard S. Katz 2001. ‘The Problem of Candidate Selection’, Party Politics, 7: 277–96.

Anthony King . 1981. ‘The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences’, British Journal of Political Science, 11: 249–285.

Gary King . 1988. ‘Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model’, American Journal of Political Science, 32: 838–63.

Samuel A. Kirkpatrick and Lelan McLemore . 1977. ‘Perceptual and Affective Components of Legislative Norms: A Social-Psychological Analysis of Congruity’, Journal of Politics, 39: 685–711.

Keith Krehbiel . 1993. ‘Where's the Party?’, British Journal of Political Science, 23: 235–66.

John Londregan . 1999. ‘Estimating Legislators’ Ideal Points’, Political Analysis, 8: 38–56.

Ian McAllister and Donley T. Studlar . 2000. ‘Conservative Euroscepticism and the Referendum Party in the 1997 British General Election’, Party Politics, 6: 359–71.

Richard E. Matland and Donley T. Studlar . 2004. ‘Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 34: 87–108.

Anthony Mughan . 1990. ‘Midterm Popularity and Governing Party Dissension in the House of Commons, 1959–79’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 341–58.

Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm . 1999. ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pippa Norris and Joni Lovenduski . 1994. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.

Philip Norton . 1975. Dissension in the House of Commons: Intra-Party Dissent in the House of Commons Division Lobbies, 1945–1974. London: MacMillan.

Philip Norton . 1987. ‘Dissent in the British House of Commons: Rejoinder to Franklin, Baxter, Jordan’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12: 143–52.

Samuel Patterson . 1989. ‘Understanding the British Parliament’, Political Studies, 37: 449–62.

J. Richard Piper . 1991. ‘British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945–87’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16: 219–238.

G. Bingham Powell and Guy D. Whitten . 1993. ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37: 391–414.

Bjørn Erik Rasch . 2000. ‘Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 3–23.

Stuart A. Rice 1925. ‘The Behavior of Legislative Groups’, Political Science Quarterly, 40: 60–72.

Donald B. Rubin 1977. ‘Formalizing Subjective Notions about the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample Surveys’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72: 538–43.

Donald B. Rubin 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley and Sons.

Donald B. Rubin 1996. ‘Multiple Imputation after 18+ Years’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91: 473–89.

Giovanni Sartori . 1991. ‘Comparing and Miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 243–57.

J. L. Schafer 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall.

John E. Schwarz 1980. ‘Exploring a New Role in Policy Making: The British House of Commons in the 1970s’, American Political Science Review, 74: 23–37.

Donald D. Searing and Chris Game . 1977. ‘Horses for Courses: The Recruitment of Whips in the British House of Commons’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 361–85.

James M. Snyder and Tim Groseclose . 2000. ‘Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 193–211.

Matthew Sowemimo . 1996. ‘The Conservative Party and European Integration, 1988–95’, Party Politics, 2: 77–97.

Arthur Spirling and Ian McLean . 2007. ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the UK House of Commons’, Political Analysis, 15: 85–96.

James A. Stimson 1985. ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay’, American Journal of Political Science, 29: 914–47.

George Tsebelis . 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.

Peter M. Vandoren 1990. ‘Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 311–39.

F. M. G. Willson 1959. ‘The Routes of Entry of New Members of the British Cabinet 1868–1958’, Political Studies, 7: 222–32.

F. M. G. Willson 1970. ‘Entry to the Cabinet, 1959–68’, Political Studies, 18: 236–38.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 576 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 541 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.