Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T02:06:30.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Contribution of wood ants to nutrient cycling and ecosystem function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Jan Frouz
Affiliation:
Charles University, Praha,Czech Republic
Veronika Jílková
Affiliation:
Charles University, Praha,Czech Republic
Jouni Sorvari
Affiliation:
University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Jenni A. Stockan
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Elva J. H. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Red wood ants (Formica rufa group) build large and long-lasting nest mounds. Due to their construction, nest mounds and especially their centres, provide a favourable microclimate for brood development (Coenen-Staβ 1980). However, constructing and maintaining the nest in addition to feeding the colony requires a considerable amount of energy and building material. The ‘central-place foraging’ strategy (Chapter 7) employed by red wood ants – retrieving food and plant material from the area surrounding the nest – means they influence not only the properties of their nests, but also those of the wider area.

Wood ants influence the functioning of forest ecosystems through altering food web structure (Chapter 8), soil properties, and nutrient transport and energy flow (Frouz and Jílková 2008). The vast accumulation of organic materials in the nest means that once the nest is no longer in use, nutrients are released during the decomposition process which is performed by microorganisms (Lenoir et al. 2001). These nutrients are then available for plant growth. This chapter addresses the effects of wood ants on nutrient flow and plant growth in forest ecosystems. Since these effects are associated with nest building and territorial activities, they can be divided into nest- and territory-related effects.

Nest-related effects

Foraging for food

Nest-related effects are connected with foraging, nest construction and the subsequent decomposition of organic materials. Decomposition in nests is enhanced because of the abundance of microorganisms and the favourable microclimate. Mineral nutrients are released from organic materials but predominantly remain in or near the ant nests, thus creating hot spots in nutrient-limited forest ecosystems. Wood ants feed on honeydew and solid insect prey; honeydew rarely forms less than two-thirds of the energy imported to F. rufa nests (Whittaker 1991). Ants may collect more than 80% of the excreted honeydew, which constitutes 62–94% of their diet and contains 15–20% sugars, a small percentage of amino acids and c. 70% water (Rosengren and Sundström 1991). Thus, approximately 13–16 kg of honeydew dry mass containing a significant amount of nutrients (Table 9.1) is transported annually into the average ant nest (Frouz et al. 1997; Jilková et al. 2012). Once transported into the ant nest, the honeydew is redistributed and used as a source of energy (Horstmann 1974).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (2002) The Nature and Properties of Soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Brandt, D. C. (1980) Thermal diffusivity of the organic material of a mound of Formica polyctena in relation to the thermoregulation of the brood. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 30: 326–344.Google Scholar
Coenen-Staβ, D., Schaarschmidt, B. and Lamprecht, I. (1980) Temperature distribution and calorimetric determination of heat production in the nest of the wood ant, Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ecology 61: 238–244.Google Scholar
Crist, T. O. and MacMahon, J. A. (1991) Individual foraging components of harvester ants: movement patterns and seed patch fidelity. Insectes Sociaux 38: 379–396.Google Scholar
Dixon, T. (2005) Insect Herbivore–Host Dynamics: Tree-dwelling Aphids. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Dlusskij, G. M. (1967) Muravji roda Formica. Moscow: Nauka.
Dmitrienko, V. K. and Petrenko, E. S. (1976) Muravji tazenych biocenos Sibiri. Novosibirsk, Russia:Nauka.
Domisch, T., Finèr, L., Ohashi, M., et al. (2006) Contribution of red wood ant mounds to forest floor CO2 efflux in boreal coniferous forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 2425–2433.Google Scholar
Domisch, T., Ohashi, M., Finèr, L., et al. (2008) Decomposition of organic matter and nutrient mineralisation in wood ant (Formica rufa group) mounds in boreal coniferous forests of different age. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44: 539–545.Google Scholar
Dostál, P., Brěznová, M., Kozlíčková, V., Herben, T. and Kovar, P. (2005) Ant-influenced soil modification and its effect on plant belowground biomass. Pedobiologia 49: 127–137.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A., Reichle, D. E. and Crossley, D. A. (1970) The role of soil invertebrates in turnover of organic matter and nutrients. In Reichle, D. E. (ed.), Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 147–172.
Frouz, J. (1996) The role of nest moisture in thermoregulation of ant (Formica polyctena, Hymenoptera, Formicidae) nests. Biologia 51: 541–547.Google Scholar
Frouz, J. (2000) The effect of nest moisture on daily temperature regime in the nests of Formica polyctena wood ants. Insectes Sociaux 47: 229–235.Google Scholar
Frouz, J. and Finèr, L. (2007) Diurnal and seasonal fluctuations in wood ant (Formica polyctena) nest temperature in two geographically distant populations along a south–north gradient. Insectes Sociaux 54: 251–259.Google Scholar
Frouz, J. and Jílková, V. (2008) The effect of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 1: 191–199.Google Scholar
Frouz, J. and Kalčík, J. (1996) The effect of wood ant Formica polyctena on contents of phosphorus in forest soils [in Czech]. In Kalcik, J. and Machacek, V. (eds), Methods of Study of Phosphorus and Other Elements (K, Ca, Na, Mg) in Soil. Ceske Budějovice, Czech Republic: Institute of Soil Biology, pp. 75–79.
Frouz, J., Šantrůčková, H. and Kalcik, J. (1997) The effect of wood ants (Formica polyctena Foerst.) on the transformation of phosphorus in a spruce plantation. Pedobiologia 41: 437–447.Google Scholar
Frouz, J., Holec, M. and Kalčík, J. (2003) The effect of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) ant nest on selected soil chemical properties. Pedobiologia 47: 205–212.Google Scholar
Frouz, J., Kalčík, J. and Cudlín, P. (2005) Accumulation of phosphorus in nests of red wood ants Formica s. str. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 269–275.Google Scholar
Horstmann, K. (1974) Untersuchungen über den Nahrungswerb der Waldameisen (Formica polyctena Foerster) im Eichenwald. III. Jahresbilanz. Oecologia 15: 187–204.Google Scholar
Jílková, V. and Frouz, J. (2014) Contribution of ant and microbial respiration to CO2 emission from wood ant nest (Formica polyctena) nests. European Journal of Soil Biology 60: 44–48.Google Scholar
Jílková, V., Matějíček, L. and Frouz, J. (2011) Changes in the pH and other soil chemical parameters in soil surrounding wood ant (Formica polyctena) nests. European Journal of Soil Biology 47: 72–76.Google Scholar
Jílková, V., Šebek, M. and Frouz, J. (2012) Mechanisms of pH change in wood ant (Formica polyctena) nests. Pedobiologia 55: 247–251.Google Scholar
Jílková, V., Domisch, T., Hořická, Z. and Frouz, J. (2013) Respiration of wood ant nest material affected by material and forest stand characteristics. Biologia 68: 1193–1197.Google Scholar
Joergensen, R. G. and Scheu, S. (1999) Response of soil microorganisms to the addition of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in a forest Rendzina. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31: 859–866.Google Scholar
Kilpeläinen, J., Finèr, L., Niemelä, P., et al. (2007) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of ant mounds (Formica rufa group) in managed boreal forests of different successional stages. Applied Soil Ecology 36: 156–163.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, S. M. and Amelung, W. (2001) Abandoned anthills of Formica polyctena and soil heterogeneity in a temperate deciduous forest: morphology and organic matter composition. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 355–363.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, S. M., Amelung, W. and Zech, W. (2001) Phosphorus forms as affected by abandoned anthills (Formica polyctena Förster) in forest soils: sequential extraction and liquid-state 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 164: 49–65.Google Scholar
Laakso, J. and Setälä, H. (1997) Nest mounds of red wood ants (Formica aquilonia): hot spots for litter-dwelling earthworms. Oecologia 111: 565–569.Google Scholar
Laakso, J. and Setälä, H. (1998) Composition and trophic structure of detrital food web in ant nest mounds of Formica aquilonia and in the surrounding forest soil. Oikos 81: 266–278.Google Scholar
Lafleur, B., Bradley, R. L. and Francoeur, A. (2002) Soil modification created by ants along a post-fire chronosequence in lichen-spruce woodland. Écoscience 9: 63–73.Google Scholar
Lafleur, B., Hooper-Bui, L. M., Mumma, E. P. and Geaghan, J. P. (2005) Soil fertility and plant growth in soils from pine forests and plantations: effect of invasive red imported fire ants Solenopsis invicta (Buren). Pedobiologia 49: 415–423.Google Scholar
Laine, K. J. and Niemelä, P. (1989) Nests and nest sites of red wood ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Subarctic Finland. Annales Entomologici Fennici 55: 81–87.Google Scholar
Lenoir, L., Bengtsson, J. and Persson, T. (1999) Effects of coniferous resin on fungal biomass and mineralization processes in wood ant nest materials. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30: 251–257.Google Scholar
Lenoir, L., Persson, T. and Bengtsson, J. (2001) Wood ant nests as potential hot spots for carbon and nitrogen mineralisation. Biology and Fertility of Soils 34: 235–240.Google Scholar
MacMahon, J. A., Mull, J. F. and Crist, T. O. (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 265–291.Google Scholar
Nkem, J. N., Lobry de Bruyn, L. A., Grant, C. D. and Hulugalle, N. R. (2000) The impact of ant bioturbation and foraging activities on surrounding soil properties. Pedobiologia 44: 609–621.Google Scholar
Ohashi, M., Finèr, L., Domisch, T., Risch, A.C. and Jürgensen, M.F. (2005) CO2 efflux from red wood ant mound in a boreal forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 130: 131–136.Google Scholar
Ohashi, M., Kilpeläinen, J., Finèr, L., et al. (2007) The effect of red wood ant (Formica rufa group) mounds on root biomass, density, and nutrient concentrations in boreal managed forests. Journal of Forest Research 12: 113–119.Google Scholar
Paul, E. A. and Clark, F. E. (1996) Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pedersen, L. B. and Bille-Hansen, J. (1999) A comparison of litterfall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 55–70.Google Scholar
Petal, J. (1978) The role of ants in ecosystems. In Brian, M. V. (ed.), Production Ecology of Ants and Termites. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–325.
Pokarzhevskij, A. D. (1981) The distribution and accumulation of nutrients in nests of ant Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Pedobiologia 21: 117–124.Google Scholar
Risch, A. C., Jürgensen, M. F., Page-Dumroese, D. S. and Schütz, M. (2005) The contribution of red wood ants to soil C and N pools and CO2 emissions in subalpine forests. Ecology 86: 419–430.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R. and Sundström, L. (1991) The interaction between red wood ants, Cinara aphids, and pines. A ghost of mutualism past? In Huxley, C. R.and Cutler, D. F. (eds), Ant–Plant Interactions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 80–91.
Rosengren, R., Fortelius, W., Lindström, K. and Luther, A. (1987) Phenology and causation of nest heating and thermoregulation in red wood ants of the Formica rufa group studied in coniferous forest habitats in southern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 24: 147–155.Google Scholar
Seeger, J. and Filser, J. (2008) Bottom-up down from the top: Honeydew as a carbon source for soil organisms. European Journal of Soil Biology 44: 483–490.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. (1996) Ameisen: Beobachten, Bestimmen. Augsburg, Germany:Naturbuch Verlag.
Stadler, B., Michalzik, B. and Müller, T. (1998) Linking aphid ecology with nutrient fluxes in a coniferous forest. Ecology 79: 1514–1525.Google Scholar
Steubing, L. (1970) Soil flora: studies of the number and activity of microorganisms in woodland soils. In Reichle, D. E. (ed), Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 131–146.
Wardle, D. A., Hyodo, F., Bardgett, R. D., Yeates, G. W. and Nilsson, M. (2011) Long-term aboveground and belowground consequences of red wood ant exclusion in boreal forest. Ecology 92: 645–656.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. B. (1991) Effects of ants on temperate woodland trees. In Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. F. (eds), Ant–Plant Interactions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–79.
Woodell, S. R. J. and King, T. J. (1991) The influence of mound-building ants on British lowland vegetation. In Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. F. (eds), Ant–Plant Interactions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 521–535.
Zacharov, A. A., Ivanickaja, E. F. and Maksimova, A. E. (1981) Nakoplenie elementov v gnezdach ryzich lesnych muravev. Pedobiologia 21: 36–45.Google Scholar
Zahn, M. (1958) Temperatursinn, Wärmehaushalt und Bauweise der roten Waldameisen (Formica rufa L.). Zoologische Beitriige, n.s., 3: 127–194.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×