Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T13:56:10.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introducing wood ants: evolution, phylogeny, identification and distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Jenni A. Stockan
Affiliation:
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen,UK
Elva J.H. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of York, Heslington, York,UK
James C. Trager
Affiliation:
Missouri Botanical Garden, Gray Summit, Missouri, USA
Izumi Yao
Affiliation:
Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Bernhard Seifert
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin,Germany
Jenni A. Stockan
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Elva J. H. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Few insects in the cool temperate northern hemisphere are as conspicuous as red wood ants. Most red wood ants build large and enduring nest mounds reaching more than 2 m in height, penetrating considerably further beneath the ground surface and thatched on top with a layer of plant material. These mounds are marvels of engineering with a complex array of tunnels and chambers in a carefully controlled environment. Nests may be interlinked, forming, in extreme cases, vast colonies of up to 400 million individual ants covering an area of more than 2.5 km2. Their sheer abundance and collective biomass in temperate forests can rival any mammalian predator.

Red wood ants properly belong to the subgenus Formica sensu stricto or F. rufa group, and can also be commonly referred to as true wood ants, thatch ants or mound ants (hereafter ‘wood ants’). These names derive from the habitat, nesting habit and colour of the adults, which are bicoloured red and brownish-black. Contained within this group of ants are several morphologically and ecologically similar species distributed throughout the Holarctic.

More impressive perhaps than even their numerical dominance is their ecological significance in driving ecosystem processes and function both above and below ground. With a role in predator–prey dynamics, nutrient cycling, seed dispersion, habitat provision and modification, and plant and tree growth, wood ants can truly be described as keystone species. As a result of their ecological importance, wood ants are protected by law in some countries, yet their populations remain threatened from a variety of sources, not least, loss of suitable habitat. This chapter describes species that are currently considered members of the subgenus Formica sensu stricto; their evolution, identification, habitat and distribution. The concept of red wood ants as social insects is introduced. The rest of the book will cover reproductive biology and social systems (Chapter 2), population genetics (Chapter 3) and ecology (Chapter 4), colony and species recognition (Chapter 5), interspecific competition (Chapter 6), foraging and interactions with other organisms (Chapters 7 and 8), nutrient cycling (Chapter 9), similarities and differences between North American and Eurasian wood ants (Chapter 10), monitoring and conservation (Chapters 11 and 12) and future research questions (Chapter 13).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernasconi, C., Pamilo, P. and Cherix, D. (2010) Molecular markers allow sibling species identification in red wood ants (Formica rufa group). Systematic Entomology 35: 243–249.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, C., Cherix, D., Seifert, B. and Pamilo, P. (2011) Molecular taxonomy of the Formica rufa group (red wood ants) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new cryptic species in the Swiss Alps?Myrmecological News 14: 37–47.Google Scholar
Cherix, D. (1983) Intraspecific variations of alarm pheromones between two populations of the red wood ant Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 56: 57–65.Google Scholar
Czechowski, W. (1996) Colonies of hybrids and mixed colonies: interspecific nest takeover in wood ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Memorabilia Zoologica 50, 1–116.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G. M. (1967) Ants of the Genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, g. Formica). Moscow: NaukaPublishing House.
Donisthorpe, H. St. J. K. (1915) British Ants: Their Life History and Classification. Plymouth, UK: W. Brendon and Son.
Forel, A. (1874) Les fourmis de la Suisse. La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland: Impr. Cooperative.
Grimaldi, D. and Agosti, D. (2000) A formicine in New Jersey Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and early evolution of the ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 13678–13683.Google Scholar
Goropashnaya, A. V. (2003) Phylogenetic structure and genetic variation in Formica ants. PhD thesis, Uppsala Universitet.
Goropashnaya, A. V., Fedorov, V. B. and Pamilo, P. (2004a) Recent speciation in the Formica rufa group ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): inference from mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 198–206.Google Scholar
Goropashnaya, A. V., Fedorov, B., Seifert, B. and Pamilo, P. (2004b) Limited phylogeographical structure across Eurasia in two red wood ant species Formica pratensis and F. lugubris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Molecular Ecology 13: 1849–1858.Google Scholar
Goropashnaya, A. V., Fedorov, V. B., Seifert, B. and Pamilo, P. (2012) Phylogenetic relationships of Palaearctic Formica species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. PLoS One 7(7): e41697.Google Scholar
Gyllenstrand, N. (2002) Effects of social organisation on spatial genetic structures in Formica ants. PhD dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
Gyllenstrand, N., Seppä, P. and Pamilo, P. (2004) Genetic differentiation in sympatric wood ants, Formica rufa and F. polyctena. Insectes Sociaux 51: 139–145.Google Scholar
Korczyńska, J., Gajewska, M., Pilot, M., Czechowski, W. and Radchenko, A. (2010) Genetic polymorphism in ‘mixed’ colonies of wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in southern Finland and its possible origin. European Journal of Entomology 107: 157–167.Google Scholar
Kulmuni, J., Seifert, B. and Pamilo, P. (2010) Segregation distortion causes large-scale differences between male and female genomes in hybrid ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 7371–7376.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. (1929) Ants, Bees and Wasps. London: Kegan Paul.
Mabelis, A. A. and Korczyńska, J. (2001) Dispersal for survival: some observations on the trunk ant (Formica truncorum Fabricius). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 51: 299–321.Google Scholar
Mackay, W. P. and Mackay, E. (2002) Ants of New Mexico (Hymenoptera: Formica). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Martin, S. J., Salazar, C., Bermingham, E., Salcedo, C., Jiggins, C. D. and Linares, M. (2008) Evolution of species-specific cuticular hydrocarbon patterns in Formica ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 131–140.Google Scholar
Nonacs, P. (2006) Interspecific hybridization in ants: at the intersection of ecology, evolution and behavior. Ecology 87: 2143–2147.Google Scholar
Oster, G. F. and Wilson, E. O. (1978) Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pamilo, P., Vepsäläinen, K., Rosengren, R., Varvio-Aho, S-L. and Pisarski, B. (1979) Population genetics of Formica ants II. Genetic differentiation between species. Annales Entomologici Fennici 45: 65–76.Google Scholar
Pamilo, P., Chautems, D. and Cherix, D. (1992) Genetic differentiation of disjunct populations of the ants Formica aquilonia and Formica lugubris in Europe. Insectes Sociaux 39: 15–29.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R. and Cherix, D. (1981) The pupa carrying test as a taxonomic tool in the Formica rufa group. In Howse, P.E and Clément, J.L. (eds.), Biosystematics of Social Insects. Systematics Association Species Volume No. 19, London: Academic Press, pp. 263–281.
Rosengren, R., Chautems, D., Cherix, D., Fortelius, W. and Keller, L. (1994) Separation of two sibling species of Formica L. ants by a behavioural choice test based on brood discrimination. Memorabilia Zoologica 48: 237–249.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. (1991) The phenotypes of the Formica rufa complex in East Germany. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz 65: 1–27.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. (1996) Formica paralugubris nov. spec.: a sympatric sibling species of Formica lugubris from the western Alps (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicoidea: Formicidae). Reichenbachia Museum Tierkunden, Dresden 31: 193201.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. (1999) Interspecific hybridisations in natural populations of ants by example of a regional fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 46: 45–52.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. (2016) The supercolonial European wood ant Formica paralugubris SEIFERT, 1996 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) introduced to Canada and its predicted role in Nearactic forests. Myrmecological News 22, 11–20.Google Scholar
Seifert, B. and Goropashnaya, A. V. (2004) Ideal phenotypes and mismatching haplotypes: errors of mtDNA treeing in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) detected by standardized morphometry. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4: 295–305.Google Scholar
Seifert, B., Kulmuni, J. and Pamilo, P. (2010) Independent hybrid populations of Formica polyctena × rufa wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) abound under conditions of forest fragmentation. Evolutionary Ecology 24: 1219–1237.Google Scholar
Walter, F., Fletcher, D. J. C., Chautems, D., et al. (1993) Identification of the sex pheromones of an ant, Formica lugubris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften 80: 30–34.Google Scholar
Weber, N. A. (1935) The biology of the thatching ant, Formica rufa obscuripes Forel, in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 5: 165–206.Google Scholar
Wheeler, G. C. and Wheeler, J. (1986) The Ants of Nevada. Los Angeles, CA: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×