Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T16:04:11.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Military applications of micro- and nanofibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Alexander L. Yarin
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Behnam Pourdeyhimi
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Seeram Ramakrishna
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Chemical warfare differs from conventional warfare, such as explosives, in the sense that the toxicity of the chemicals used is very dangerous to the combatants in the battlefield, or to the civil population being affected during a war or as a result of a terrorist attack. The threat is amplified by concealment and low cost and relatively easy production of these agents, which renders them weapons of mass destruction. It becomes essential in such a situation that soldiers wear protective clothing, respirators, face masks, gloves, etc. Initially German troops unleashed chemical warfare agents, such as mustard agent, HD, during World War I in 1915, and this resulted in much more concern during World War II. Thus research on decontamination of chemical and biological warfare agents (CWAs) has been the subject of serious interest in many research laboratories since World War II. Mustard gas or bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfide is one of the highly cytotoxic, readily methylating CWAs that are regulated under the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). It covalently binds to DNA bases or forms disulfide bonds with the thiol groups. This readily leads to programmed cell death or the mutated DNA leads to cancer. The simultaneous danger associated with this toxic agent is its high skin penetration owing to its high lipophilicity, which results in immediate blister formation and huge uptake through skin within a short duration of exposure (Ivarsson et al. 1992).

Conventional modes of decontamination involve activated charcoal or other such heavy physical adsorbants of the contaminant. When compared with technologies employing conventional catalysts and reactive sorbents, which are specific and sometimes time-consuming, nanotechnology-based nanomaterials are highly reactive, nonselective and multifunctional in character. Current development of nanoparticles such as MgO, Al2O3, Fe2O3, ZnO and TiO2 and their incorporation into nanofibers impart enhanced catalytic, disinfection and sensing capabilities, photo-protection capability, and stain-resistance and self-cleaning properties. The testing of these materials in textiles and protective clothing against CWAs showed that they have potential as replacement technology in such applications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Yuan, X., 2009. Preparation and antibacterial activity of electrospun chitosan/poly(ethylene oxide) membranes containing silver nanoparticles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 287, 1425–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleise, A., Danesi, P. R., Burkart, W., 2003. Properties, use and health effects of depleted uranium: A general overview. J. Environ. Radioact. 64, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuiffo, M., Halada, G., 2012. Cross-linked chitosan-based materials for decontamination, containment and barriers. Materials Issues in Nuclear Waste Management in the 21st Century. Meeting: Materials Science and Technology 2012, Pittsburgh, PA.
Dadvar, S., Tavanai, H., Morshed, M., Ghiaci, M., 2012. The removal of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide using activated carbon nanofibers embedded with MgO and Al2O3 nanoparticles. J. Chem. Eng. Data 57, 1456−1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, F., Schlitt, M., Pedersen, D. B., Kraatz, H. B., 2011. Chemical behavior of electrochemically generated nanostructured silver surfaces. Langmuir 27, 12098–12105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felix-Rivera, H., Gonzalez, R., DelMar Rodrıguez, G., Primera-Pedrozo, O. M., Rios-Velazquez, C., Hernandez-Rivera, S. P., 2011. Improving SERS detection of bacillus thuringiensis using silver nanoparticles reduced with hydroxylamine and with citrate capped borohydride. Int. J. Spectrosc. 2011, 989504.Google Scholar
Filatov, Y., Budyka, A., Kirichenko, V., 2007. Electrospinning of Micro- and Nanofibers. Fundamentals and Applications in Separation and Filtration Processes. Begell House, New York.Google Scholar
Galdiero, S., Falanga, A., Vitiello, M., Cantisani, M., Marra, V., Galdiero, M., 2011. Silver nanoparticles as potential antiviral agents. Molecules 16, 8894–8918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, P. W., Schreuder-Gibson, H. L., Rivin, D., 1999. Electrospun fiber mats: transport properties. AIChE J. 45, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenbichler, J. P., Boswald, M., Lugauer, S., Krall, T., 1999. A new technology of microdispersed silver in polyurethane induces antimicrobial activity in central venous catheters. Infection 27, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, D., Filocamo, S., Kirby, R., Steckl, A. J., 2011. Deactivating chemical agents using enzyme-coated nanofibers formed by electrospinning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 3, 4633−4639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivarsson, U., Nilsson, H., Santesson, J. (Eds.), 1992. A FOA Briefing Book on Chemical Weapons: Threat, Effects, and Protection. National Defence Research Establishment, Umeå.
Joshi, M., Banerjee, K., Prasanth, R., 2006. Polyurethane/clay nanocomposite based coating for enhanced gas barrier property. Ind J. Fibre Text. Res. 31, 202–214.Google Scholar
Jung, K. H., Ji, L., Pourdeyhimi, B., Zhang, X., 2010. Structure–property relationships of polymer-filled nonwoven membranes for chemical protection applications. J. Membr. Sci. 361, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, H., Jang, J., 2008a. Antibacterial properties of novel poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofiber containing silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 24, 2051–2056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, H., Jang, J., 2008b. Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of novel silver/polyrhodanine nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 9, 2677–2681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, H., Song, J., Jang, J., 2009. One-step preparation of antimicrobial polyrhodanine nanotubes with silver nanoparticles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 30, 1350–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lala, N. L., Ramaseshan, R., Bojun, L., Sundarrajan, S., Barhate, R. S., Ying-jun, L., Ramakrishna, S., 2007. Fabrication of nanofibers with antimicrobial functionality used as filters: protection against bacterial contaminants. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97, 1357–1365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E. M., Lee, H. W., Park, J. H., Han, Y., Ji, B. C., Oh, W., Deng, Y. L, Yeum, J. H., 2008. Multihollow structured poly(methyl methacrylate)/silver nanocomposite microspheres prepared by suspension polymerization in the presence of dual dispersion agents. Colloid Polym. Sci. 286, 1379–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Leung, P., Yao, L., Song, Q. W., Newton, E., 2006. Antimicrobial effect of surgical masks coated with nanoparticles. J. Hosp. Infect. 62, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marambio-Jones, C., Hoek, E. M. V., 2010. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J Nanopart. Res. 12, 1531–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Y., Yao, C., Fan, K., Li, X., 2012. Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes with superior antibacterial and easy-cleaning properties through hydrophilic flexible spacers. J. Membr. Sci. 417–418, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melaiye, A., Sun, Z., Hindi, K., Milsted, A., Ely, D., Reneker, D. H., Tessier, C. A., Youngs, W. J., 2005. Silver(I)-imidazole cyclophane gem-diol complexes encapsulated by electrospun tecophilic nanofibers: formation of nanosilver particles and antimicrobial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 2285–2291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, W., 2002. Overview of current collective protection filtration technology. Presented at 2002 NBC Defense Collective Protection Conference, USA, 2002. Available at , and . Accessed August 9, 2013.
Navarathne, D., Ner, Y., Jain, M., Grote, J. G., Sotzing, G. A., 2011. Fabrication of DNA–magnetite hybrid nanofibers for water detoxification. Mater. Lett. 65, 219–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oule, M. K., Azinwi, R., Bernier, A. M., Kablan, T., Maupertuis, A. M., Mauler, S., Nevry, R. K., Dembele, K., Forbes, L., Diop, L., 2008. Polyhexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride-based disinfectant: a novel tool to fight meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and nosocomial infections. J. Med. Microbiol. 57, 1523–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radheshkumar, C., Munstedt, H., 2006. Antimicrobial polymers from polypropylene/silver composites – Ag+ release measured by anode stripping voltammetry. React. Funct. Polym. 66, 780–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopalan, S., Koper, O., Decker, S., Klabunde, K. J., 2002. Nanocrystalline metal oxides as destructive adsorbents for organophosphorus compounds at ambient temperatures. Chem. Eur. J. 8, 2602–2607.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramakrishnan, R., Ramakrishna, S., 2007. Zinc titanate nanofibers for the detoxification of chemical warfare simulants. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 1836–1842.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, R., Sundarrajan, S., Yingjun, L., Barhate, R. S., Lala, N. L., Ramakrishna, S., 2006. Functionalized polymer nanofibre membranes for protection from chemical warfare stimulants. Nanotechnology 17, 2947–2953.Google Scholar
Rivin, D., Meermeier, G., Schneider, N. S., Vishnyakov, A., Neimark, A. V., 2004 Simultaneous transport of water and organic molecules through polyelectrolyte membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 8900–8909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinwald, A., Murphy, F. A., Prina-Mello, A., Poland, C. A., Byrne, F., Movia, D., Glass, J. R., Dickerson, J. C., Schultz, D. A., Jeffree, C. E., Macnee, W., Donaldson, K., 2012. The threshold length for fiber-induced acute pleural inflammation: shedding light on the early events in asbestos-induced mesothelioma. Toxicol. Sci. 128, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundarrajan, S., Pliszka, D., Ramakrishna, S., Jaworek, A., Krupa, A., Lackowski, M., 2009. A novel process for the fabrication of nanocomposites membranes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 4442–4447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, W. D., 1962. Uranium Metallurgy. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Wu, K. H., Yu, P. Y., Hsieh, Y. J., Yang, C. C., Wang, G. P., 2009. Preparation and characterization of silver-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)/ polyethyleneimine hybrids as a chemical and biological protective material. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 94, 2170–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousef, A., Barakat, N. A. M., Amna, T., Al-Deyab, S. S., Hassan, M. S., Abdel-hay, A., Kim, H. Y., 2012. Inactivation of pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae by CuO/TiO2 nanofibers: A multifunctional nanomaterial via one-step electrospinning. Ceram. Int. 38, 4525–4532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, W., Jiang, G., Che, J., Qi, X., Xu, R., Chang, M. W., Chen, Y., Lim, S. Y., Dai, J., Chan-Park, M. B., 2008. Deposition of silver nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes grafted with hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) and their antimicrobial effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 18754–18759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Lee, M. W., An, S., Sinha-Ray, S., Khansari, S., Joshi, B., Hong, S., Hong, J. H., Kim, J. J., Pourdeyhimi, B., Yoon, S. S., Yarin, A. L., 2013. Antibacterial activity of photocatalytic electrospun titania nanofiber mats and solution-blown soy protein nanofiber mats decorated with silver nanoparticles. Catal. Commun. 34, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H. Y., 2012. Adsorbents of titanate nanofibers and nanotubes for the removal of radioactive ions from contaminated water. Materials Issues in Nuclear Waste Management in the 21st Century. Meeting: Materials Science and Technology 2012, Pittsburgh, PA.
Zhu, J., Bahramian, Q., Gibson, P., Schreuder-Gibson, H., Sun, G., 2012. Chemical and biological decontamination functions of nanofibrous membranes. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 8532–8540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×