Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:50:29.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography of secondary sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Robert Pasnau
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasi, Ghulam Haider. Muslim Understanding of Other Religions: A Study of Ibn Hazm’s Kitāb al faṣl fʿ al-milal wa-al-ahwāʾ wa-al-niḥal (Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Islamic Research Institute, 1999).Google Scholar
Abed, Shukri. Aristotelian Logic and the Arabic Language in Alfarabi (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Acar, Rahim. Talking about God and Talking about Creation: Avicenna’s and Thomas Aquinas’ Positions (Leiden: Brill, 2005).Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Ockham on Final Causality: Muddying the Waters,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998) 1–46.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Ockham on Identity and Distinction,” Franciscan Studies 36 (1976) 5–74.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Scotus and Ockham on the Connection of the Virtues,” in Honnefelder, L. et al. (eds.) John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 1996) 499–522.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. William Ockham (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “AbūMaʿshar, al-KindĪ and the Philosophical Defense of Astrology,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 69 (2002) 245–70.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. The Arabic Plotinus (London: Duckworth, 2002).Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “The Arabic Sea Battle: al-FārābĪ on the Problem of Future Contingents,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (2006) 163–88.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “Before Essence and Existence: Al-Kindi’s Conception of Being,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002) 297–312.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. Al-KindĪ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “Al-Kindi and the Reception of Greek Philosophy,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 32–51.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “Miskawayh’s Psychology,” in Adamson, P. (ed.) Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception (London: Warburg Institute, 2007) 39–54.Google Scholar
Adang, Camilla. Muslim Writers on Judaism and the Hebrew Bible: From Ibn Rabban to Ibn Hazm (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Addas, Claude. Quest for Red Sulphur: The Life of Ibn ʿArabʿ, tr. Kingsley, P. (Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1993).Google Scholar
Adnés, Pierre. “Pénitence,” in Viller, M. et al. (eds.) Dictionnaire de spiritualité (Paris: Beauchesne, 1984) XII.1: 943–1004.Google Scholar
Aerts, W. J. et al. (eds.). Vincent of Beauvais and Alexander the Great: Studies on the Speculum maius and its Translations into Medieval Vernaculars (Groningen: Forsten, 1986).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A.Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A.Ontology and Henology in Medieval Philosophy (Thomas Aquinas, Master Eckhart and Berthold of Moosburg),” in Bos, E. and Meyer, P. (eds.) On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 1992) 120–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. and Endress, Gerhard (eds.). Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition: Sources, Constitution, and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126–1198) (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas (eds.). Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au moyen âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A., Emery, Kent, and Speer, Andreas (eds.). Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar
Affifi, Abul Ela. The Mystical Philosophy of Muhyid Din-Ibnul Arabi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Ahmad, Rashid. “Abu al-Qasim al-Qushairi as a Theologian and Commentator,” Islamic Quarterly 13 (1969) 16–69.Google Scholar
Ahner, Moritz Max. Fredegis von Tours: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie im Mittelalter (Leipzig: Brückner und Niemann, 1878).Google Scholar
Aiello, Andrea and Wielockx, Robert. Goffredo di Fontaines, aspirante baccelliere Sentenziario: le autografe “Notule de scientia theologie” e la cronologia del ms. Paris BNF Lat. 16297 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2008).Google Scholar
Akasoy, Anna. Philosophie und Mystik in der späten Almohadenzeit die Sizilianischen Fragen des Ibn SabʿĪn (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
al-ʿAlawi, J. D.Muʾallafat Ibn Bajja (Beirut: Dar ath-Thaqafa, 1983).Google Scholar
Albert, Karl. Meister Eckarts These vom Sein: Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Opus tripartitum (Saarbrücken: Universitäts- und Schulbuchverlag, 1976).Google Scholar
Alessio, Gian Carlo. “Il commento di Gentile da Cingoli a Martino di Dacia,” in Buzzetti, D. et al. (eds.) L’insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo (Bologna: Istituto per la Storia dell’Università, 1992) 4–71.Google Scholar
Allard, Guy (ed.). Jean Scot écrivain (Montréal: Bellarmin, 1986).Google Scholar
Allard, Michel. Le problème des attributs divins dans la doctrine d’al-Asʿari et de ses premiers grands disciples (Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1965).Google Scholar
Allen, Elliot B.Hervaeus Natalis: An Early ‘Thomist’ on the Notion of Being,” Mediaeval Studies 22 (1960) 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alliney, Guido. “Fra Scoto e Ockham: Giovanni di Reading e il dibattito sulla libertà a Oxford (1310–1320),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 7 (1996) 243–68.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido. “‘Tempus naturae’ e ‘tempus mathematicum’ in Nicola Bonet,” in Cacciotti, A. and Sella, P. (eds.) Revirescunt chartae codices documenta textus: miscellanea in honorem P. Caesaris Cenci OFM, vol. II (Rome: Edizioni Antonianum, 2002) 1089–113.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido. Time and Soul in Fourteenth-Century Theology: Three Questions of William of Alnwick on the Existence, the Ontological Status and the Unity of Time (Florence: Olschki, 2002).Google Scholar
Alonso, Manuel. Teología de Averroes: estudios y documentos (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1947).Google Scholar
al-Alousi, , al-DĪn, Husām MuhĪ. The Problem of Creation in Islamic Thought (Baghdad: National Printing and Publishing Co., 1968).Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander. “Creation and Emanation in Isaac Israeli: A Reappraisal,” in Twersky, I. (ed.) Studies in Medieval Jewish History and Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979) 1–15.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander. “Ibn Bajja on Man’s Ultimate Felicity,” in Lieberman, S. (ed.) Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume on the Occasion of his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, vol. I (Jerusalem: American Academy for Jewish Research, 1965) 47–87.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander. Studies in Religious Philosophy and Mysticism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Amerini, Fabrizio. “Alessandro di Alessandria sulla natura degli accidenti,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16 (2005) 179–235.Google Scholar
Amerini, Fabrizio. “La dottrina della significatio di Francesco da Prato O. P. (XIV secolo). Una critica tomista a Guglielmo di Ockham,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11 (2000) 375–408.Google Scholar
Amerini, Fabrizio. “Thomas Aquinas, Alexander of Alexandria and Paul of Venice on the Nature of Essence,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004) 541–91.Google Scholar
Amerini, Fabrizio. “What is Real? A Reply to Ockham’s Ontological Program,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 187–212.Google Scholar
Aminrazavi, Mehdi. Suhrawardi and the School of Illumination (Richmond, UK: Curzon, 1997).Google Scholar
Anawati, Georges. “La doctrine des accidents chez les penseurs musulmans d’après le commentaire du K. al-Mawaqif de Iji par Jurjani,” in Dirāsāt falsafiyya muhdāt ilā al-duktūr IbrāhĪm Madkūr (Cairo: al-Hayah al-MisrĪyah al-ʿāmmah lil-Kitāb, 1974) 91–120.Google Scholar
Anawati, Georges et al. (eds.). Muʾallafāt Ibn Rushd (Bibliographie d’Averroes) (al-Jazāʿir: Jāmiʿat al-Duwal al-ʿArabĪya, 1978).Google Scholar
Anciaux, Paul. La théologie du sacrament de pénitence au XIIe siècle (Leuven: Nauwelaerts, 1949).Google Scholar
André, G. S.Les Quodlibeta de Bernard de Trilia,” Gregorianum 2 (1921) 226–65.Google Scholar
Andrews, Robert. “Andrew of Cornwall and the Reception of Modism in England,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1999) 105–15.Google Scholar
Andrews, Robert. “Denomination in Peter of Auvergne,” in Kretzmann, N. (ed.) Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988) 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Robert. “Thomas Maulevelt’s Denial of Substance,” in Newton, L. (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Robert and Noone, Timothy B.. “A Newly Identified Redaction of Richard Clive’s ‘Quaestiones metaphysicae’: With Edition of Three Questions on Relation,” Manuscripta 38 (1994) 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrieu-Guitrancourt, Pierre. L’archevêque Eudes Rigaud et la vie de l’église au 13e siècle (Paris: Sirey, 1938).Google Scholar
Angelopoulos, Athanasios. Nikolaos Kabasilas Hamaetos, he zoe kai to ergon autou (Thessaloniki: Patriarchikon Hidryma Paterikon Meleton, 1970).Google Scholar
Arberry, A. J.The Koran Interpreted (London: Macmillan, 1955).Google Scholar
Arbesmann, Rudolph. “The Concept of ‘Christus medicus’ in St. Augustine,” Traditio 10 (1954) 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, Roger. “Cartesian Empiricism,” Revue roumaine de philosophie 50 (2006) 71–85.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. Descartes and the Last Scholastics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. “Oratorians and the Teaching of Cartesian Philosophy in Seventeenth-Century France,” History of Universities 17 (2001–2) 47–80.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, Cottingham, John, and Sorell, Tom (trs.). Cambridge Texts in Context: Descartes’ Meditations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arikha, Noga. Passions and Tempers: A History of the Humours (New York: Ecco, 2007).Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shiʿite Iran from the Beginning to 1890 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkoun, Mohammed. Contribution à l’étude de l’humanisme arabe au IVe/Xe siècle: Miskawayh, philosophe et historien, 2nd edn (Paris: Vrin, 1982).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Regis et al. (eds.). Francis of Assisi. Early Documents (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger. Averroes: A Rationalist in Islam, tr. Streight, D. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger. Grammaire et théologie chez Ibn Hazm de Cordoue: essai sur la structure et les conditions de la pensée musulmane (Paris: Vrin, 1984).Google Scholar
Arquillière, Henri Xavier. L’augustinisme politique: essai sur la formation des théories politiques du Moyen-Age, 2nd edn (Paris: Vrin, 1955).Google Scholar
al-Aʿsam, ʿAbd al-AmĪr. History of Ibn ar-Riwandi the Heretic (Beirut: Manshūrāt Dār al-Afāq al-JadĪdah, 1975).Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth-Century Logic: Aquinas in Context,” Mediaeval Studies 54 (1992) 94–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “‘Can I Speak More Clearly Than I Understand?’ A Problem of Religious Language in Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and Ockham,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “An Early Fifteenth Century Discussion of Infinite Sets,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (1977) 232–4.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “English Obligationes Texts after Roger Swyneshed: The Tracts Beginning Obligatio est quaedam ars,” in Lewry, O. P. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983) 309–33.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Mental Language and the Unity of Propositions: A Semantic Problem Discussed by Early Sixteenth-Century Logicians,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 61–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Ralph Strode on Inconsistency in Obligational Disputations,” in Jacobi, K. (ed.) Argumentationstheorie. Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns (Leiden: Brill, 1993) 363–86.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Signification and Modes of Signifying in Thirteenth-Century Logic: A Preface to Aquinas on Analogy,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991) 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics (London: Variorum Reprints, 1985).Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Theories of Propositions: Some Early Sixteenth-Century Discussions,” Franciscan Studies 38 (1978) 81–121.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar from Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography from 1836 Onwards (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1978).Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer and Spade, Paul Vincent. “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford,” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asín Palacios, Miguel. The Mystical Philosophy of Ibn Masarra and his Followers, tr. Douglas, E. H. and Yoder, H. W. (Leiden: Brill, 1978).Google Scholar
,Association des amis du Centremédiéval européen de Chartres (ed.). Enseigner le Moyen Age à partir d’un monument, la cathédrale de Chartres: le temps de Fulbert (Chartres: Société archéologique d’Eure-et-Loir, 1996).
,Association Bourguignonne des Sociétés Savantes. Saint Bernard théologien: actes du Congres de Dijon, 2nd edn (Rome: Editiones Cistercienses, 1956).
Azanza Elío, Ana. El conocimiento de Dios según Pedro de Atarrabia (Pamplona: Ediciones Eunate, 1997).Google Scholar
al-Azmeh, Aziz. Ibn Khaldūn: An Essay in Reinterpretation (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
al-Azmeh, Aziz. Ibn Khaldūn in Modern Scholarship: A Study in Orientalism (London: Third World Centre, 1981).Google Scholar
Babbitt, Susan M.Oresme’s Livre de Politiques and the France of Charles V (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1985).Google Scholar
Bachrach, David. Religion and the Conduct of War c. 300–1215 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bäck, Allan. On Reduplication: Logical Theories of Qualification (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Back, Samuel. Joseph Albo’s Bedeutung in der Geschichte der jüdischen Religionsphilosophie: ein Beitrag zur genauern Kenntniss der Tendenz des Buches “IKKARIM” (Breslau: Heidenfeld, 1869).Google Scholar
Backes, Ignaz. Die Christologie, Soteriologie und Mariologie des Ulrich von Strassburg: ein Beitrag zur Geistegeschichte des 13. Jahrhunderts (Trier: Paulinus-Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar
Backus, Irene. (ed.). The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Baer, Yitzhak. “Abner of Burgos’ Minhat Qenaʿot and its Influence on Hasdai Crescas,” Tarbiz 11 (1940) 188–206.Google Scholar
Baeumker, Clemens. Die Stellung des Alfred von Sareshel (Alfredus Anglicus) und seiner Schrift De motu cordis in der Wissenschaft des beginnenden XIII. Jahrhunderts (Munich: Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1913).Google Scholar
Baeumker, Clemens. Witelo: ein Philosoph und Naturforscher des dreizehnten Jahrhunderts (Münster: Aschendorff, 1908; repr. 1991).Google Scholar
Baeumker, Clemens. “Zur Frage nach Abfassungszeit und Verfasser des irrtümlich Witelo zugeschriebenen Liber de intelligentiis,” in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle (Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1924) I: 87–202.Google Scholar
Bainton, Roland. Christian Attitudes toward War and Peace (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.Aristotelian Metaphysics and Eucharistic Theology: John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen on the Ontological Status of Accidental Being,” in Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Zupko, J. (eds.) The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 247–64.Google Scholar
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.Guiral Ot et le mouvement autour de la question De motu conservée dans le manuscrit Madrid, Biblioteca nacional, 4229,” Early Science and Medicine 8 (2003) 298–319.Google Scholar
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.La raison et le miracle: les doctrines eucharistiques (c. 1250–c.1400). Contribution à l’étude des rapports entre philosophie et théologie (Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 1999).Google Scholar
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.Réalisme et rémanence: La doctrine eucharistique de Jean Wyclif,” in Fumagalli, M.-T., Brocchieri, Beonio and Simonetta, S. (eds.) John Wyclif: logica, teologia, politica (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2003) 87–112.Google Scholar
Bakker, Paul J. J. M. and Dekker, D.-J.. “Antoine Andreé ou Jean le Chanoine? àpropos de l’authenticité du commentaire de la Physique conservé dans le ms. Cambridge, Gonville & Caius College, 368 (590),” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 42 (2000) 101–31.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John. Masters, Princes and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter and his Circle (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Baltes, Matthias. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den Antiken interpreten (Leiden: Brill, 1976–8).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Judith. “Aquinas on the Role of Emotion in Moral Judgement and Activity,” in Bazań, B. C. et al. (eds.) Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen âge, vol. II (New York: Legas, 1995) 642–53.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. “Living Painting, or the Limits of Pointing? Glancing at Icons with Michael Psellos,” in Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.) Reading Michael Psellos (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 117–30.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles and Jenkins, David (eds.). Reading Michael Psellos (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Barbet, Jeanne. “Le commentaire des Sentences de Jean de Rodington, O.F.M. (†1348) d’après les manuscrits Reims 503 et Toulouse 192,” Bulletin d’information de l’Institut de recherche et d’histoire des textes 3 (1954) 55–63.Google Scholar
Barbour, Hugh Christopher. The Byzantine Thomism of George Gennadios Scholarios and his Translation of Armandus de Bellovise on the De Ente et Essentia of Thomas Aquinas (Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1993).Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. Social and Political Thought in Byzantium: From Justinian I to the Last Palaeologus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. “The Just War,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 771–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barocelli, Francesco. “Per Biagio Pelacani, un Convegno e un ‘Centro Studi’,” in Vescovini, G. Federici (ed.) Filosofia, scienza e astrologia nel Trecento europeo (Padua: Il Poligrafo, 1992) 21–38.Google Scholar
Baron, Roger. études sur Hugues de Saint-Victor (Paris: De Brouwer, 1963).Google Scholar
Baron, Roger. Science et sagesse chez Hugues de Saint-Victor (Paris: Lethielleux, 1957).Google Scholar
Barton, J. L.The Mystery of Bracton,” Journal of Legal History 14 (1993) 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashier, Salman. Ibn alʿArabĪ’s Barzakh: The Concept of the Limit and the Relationship between God and the World (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bataillon, Louis J., Dahan, Gilbert, and Gy, Pierre-Marie (eds.). Hugues de Saint-Cher (†1263): Bibliste et théologien (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudelet, Yves-Anselme. L’expérience spirituelle selon Guillaume de Saint-Thierry (Paris: Cerf, 1985).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Matthias. Die Erkenntnislehre des Wilhelm von Auvergne (Münster: Aschendorff, 1893).Google Scholar
Bautz, Friedrich (ed.). Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (Herzberg: Bautz, 1970–2007).Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo C.13th-Century Commentaries on De anima: From Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas,” in Fioravanti, G. et al. (eds.) Il commento filosofico nell’Occidente latino, secoli XIII–XV (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) 119–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo C.The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas’s Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 64 (1997) 95–126.Google Scholar
Beale, Joseph. Bartolus on the Conflict of Laws (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914; repr. Westport, CT: Hyperion Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Beck, Hans Georg. Theodoros Metochites, die Krise des byzantinischen Weltbildes im 14. Jahrhundert (Munich: Beck, 1952).Google Scholar
Becker, Adam. Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom. The School of Nisibis and Christian Scholastic Culture in Late Antique Mesopotamia (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Beckmann, Jan. Ockham-Bibliographie: 1900–1990 (Hamburg: Meiner, 1992).Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. Christ’s Body: Identity, Culture, and Society in Late Medieval Writings (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Bedouelle, Guy, Cessario, Romanus, and White, Kevin (eds.). Jean Capreolus et son temps 1380–1444 (Paris: Cerf, 1997).Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel. “The Rule of the Wise and the Holy: Hierarchy in the Thomistic System,” Political Theory 14 (1984) 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggiani, Seely J.Theology at the Service of Mysticism: Method in Pseudo-Dionysius,” Theological Studies 57 (1996) 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beha, H. M.Matthew of Aquasparta’s Theory of Cognition,” Franciscan Studies 20 (1960) 161–204; 21 (1961) 383–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behloul, Samuel-Martin. Ibn Hazms Evangelienkritik: eine methodische Untersuchung (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner (ed.). Begriff und Metapher: Sprachform des Denkens bei Eriugena (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1990).Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, WernerEriugena: Grundzüge seines Denkens (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1994).Google Scholar
Beitz, Egid. Rupert von Deutz: seineWerke und die bildende Kunst (Cologne: Verlag des kölnischen Geschichtsvereins, 1930).Google Scholar
Bejczy, István Pieter. “Two Questions of Stephen Langton on the Cardinal Virtues,” Medioevo 31 (2006) 299–336.Google Scholar
Bejczy, István Pieter and Newhauser, Richard (eds.). Virtue and Ethics in the Twelfth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, David. The Image and Likeness: The Augustinian Spirituality of William of St Thierry (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984).Google Scholar
Bell, Joseph N.Love Theory in Later Hanbalite Islam (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Belmond, Séraphin. “La théorie de la connaissance d’après RogerMarston,” La France Franciscaine 17 (1934) 153–87.Google Scholar
Belo, Catarina. Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benakis, Linos. “Bibliographie internationale sur la philosophie Byzantine (1949–1990),” in Bibliographie Byzantine publiéàl’occasion du XVIIIe Congrès Internationale d’études Byzantines (Athens: Comité hellénique des études byzantines, 1991) 319–77.Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos. “Michael Psellos’ Kritik an Aristoteles und seine eigene Lehre zur Physis- und Materie-Form-Problematik,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 56 (1963) 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benakis, Linos. “The Problem of General Concepts in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Thought,” in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Christian Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1982) 75–86 and 248–9.Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos. “Studien zu den Aristoteles-Kommentaren des Michael Psellos,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 43 (1961) 215–38; 44 (1962) 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benakis, Linos. “Die theoretische und praktische Autonomie der Philosophie als Fachdisziplin in Byzanz,” in Asztalos, M. et al. (eds.) Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990) I: 223–7.Google Scholar
Bergé, Marc. Pour un humanisme vécu: Abu Hayyan al-Tawhidi (Damascus: Institut français de Damas, 1979).Google Scholar
Berger, Harald. “Albert von Sachsen (1316?–1390). Bibliographie der Sekundärlitteratur,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 36 (1994) 148–85; 37 (1995) 175–86; 38 (1996) 143–52; 40 (1998) 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsträsser, Gotthelf. Hunain ibn Ishak und seine Schule: Sprach- und literargeschichtliche untersuchungen zu den arabischen Hippokrates- und Galen-übersetzungen (Leiden: Brill, 1913).Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Luci and Squitier, Karl A. (eds.). Thesaurus Linguae Graecae: Canon of Greek Authors and Works, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Berlioz, Jacques and Beaulieu, Marie Anne Polo. Les exempla médiévaux: nouvelles perspectives (Paris: Champion, 1998).Google Scholar
Bermon, Pascale. L’assentiment et son objet chez Grégoire de Rimini (Paris: Vrin, 2007).Google Scholar
Bernard, Paul. “Jerome of Prague, Austria and the Hussites,” Church History 35 (1958) 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, Mathäus. “Zum Schrifttum des Petrus von Aquila OFM († 1361),” Franziskanische Studien 35 (1953) 113–15.Google Scholar
Bertagna, Mario. “Richard Ferrybridge’s Logica: A Handbook for Solving Sophismata,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertola, Ermenegildo. “La dottrina dell’immortalità dell’anima in Johannes Blundus,” Aquinas 9 (1966) 28–48.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Camille. “Antoine André, témoin et interprète de Duns Scot.Antonianum 54 (1979) 385–466.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Camille. “Henri de Gand et Mathieu d’Aquasparta interprètes de saint Bonaventure,” Naturaleza y gracia 21 (1974) 131–72.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Camille and Gieben, Servus. “Guibert de Tournai et Robert Grosseteste: sources inconnues de la doctrine de l’illumination suivi de l’édition critique de trois chapitres du Rudimentum doctrinae de Guibert de Tournai,” in Sanctus Bonaventura: 1274–1974 (Grottaferrata: Collegium Sancti Bonaventurae, 1973) 627–54.Google Scholar
Besnier, Bernard, Moreau, Pierre-François, and Renault, Laurence (eds.). Les passions antiques et médiévales (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besta, Enrico. L’opera d’Irnerio: contributo alla storia del diritto italiano (Turin: Loescher, 1896).Google Scholar
Bettoni, Efrem. Le dottrina filosofiche di Pier di Giovanni Olivi (Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1959).Google Scholar
Betts, Edward Tracy. Humbert of Romans: His Life and Views of Thirteenth-Century Society (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1984).Google Scholar
Betts, R. R.Jerome of Prague,” in Essays in Czech History (London: Athlone, 1969) 195–235.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Luca. Censure et liberté intellectuelle à l’Université de Paris (XIIIe–XIVe siècles) (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1999).Google Scholar
Bianchi, Luca. Il vescovo e i filosofi. La condanna Parigina del 1277 e l’evoluzione dell’aristotelismo scolastico (Bergamo: Pierluigi Lubrina Editore, 1990).Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Les controverses sur l’objet du savoir et les ‘complexe significabilia’ à Paris au XIVe siècle,” in Caroti, S. (ed.) Quia inter doctores est magna dissensio: les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVe siècle (Florence: Olschki, 2004) 1–31.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. Guillaume d’Ockham: Logique et philosophie (Paris: Presses universitaires des France, 1997).Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. Guillaume d’Ockham et la théologie (Paris: Cerf, 1999).Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. Logique et théorie du signe au XIVe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1989).Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “The Natural Order in John Buridan,” in Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Zupko, J. (eds.) The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 77–95.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. (ed.). Paris–Vienne au XIVe siècle. Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe (Actes de la Table ronde internationale, Paris, 19–22 juin 1990) (Paris: Vrin, 1991).Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Présence et représentation chez Pierre d’Ailly: quelques problèmes de théorie de la connaissance au XIVe siècle,” Dialogue 31 (1992) 459–74.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “La signification d’objets imaginaires dans quelques texts anglais du XIVe siècle (Guillaume Heytesbury,Henry Hopton),” in Lewry, O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983) 265–83.Google Scholar
Gambalunga, Biblioteca civica. Gregorio da Rimini filosofo: atti del convegno (Rimini: Raffaelli, 2003).Google Scholar
Bignami-Odier, Jeanne. “Le manuscrit Vatican latin 2186,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 11 (1938) 133–66.Google Scholar
Biller, Peter. The Measure of Multitude: Population in Medieval Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Biller, Peter and Minnis, A. J.. Handling Sin: Confession in the Middle Ages (Woodbridge, UK: York Medieval Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Birk, Bonnie A.Christine de Pizan and Biblical Wisdom: A Feminist-Theological Point of View (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, Aleksander. “Avicennas Vorrede zum ‘Liber Sufficientiae’ und Roger Bacon,” in Birkenmajer, A. (ed.) études d’histoire des sciences et de la philosophie du moyen âge (Wroclaw: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1970) 89–101.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, Aleksander. “études sur Witelo, I–IV,” Bulletin international de l’Académie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe d’histoire et de philosophie année 1918 (1920) 4–6; année 1919–20 (1922–4) 354–60; année 1922 (1925) 6–9.Google Scholar
Bissen, Jean-Marie. “Question inédite de Guillaume de Ware, OFM, sur le motif de l’incarnation,” études Franciscaines 46 (1934) 218–22.Google Scholar
Black, Antony. The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Black, Antony. Political Thought in Europe, 1250–1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Antony. “Society and the Individual from the Middle Ages to Rousseau: Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Constitutional Theory,” History of Political Thought 1 (1980) 145–66.Google Scholar
Black, Antony. The West and Islam: Religion and Political Thought in World History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah L.Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows,” in Rahman, S. et al. (eds.) The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition: Science, Logic, Epistemology and their Interactions (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008) 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah L.Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions,” Dialogue 32 (1993) 219–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah L.Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformations,” Topoi 19 (2000) 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah L.Knowledge (ʿilm) and Certitude (yaqĪn) in al-FārābĪ’s Epistemology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2006) 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, Léon. Les antécédents historiques du “Je pense, donc je suis” (Paris: Alcan, 1920).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David. “Providence in the Philosophy of Hasdai Crescas and Joseph Albo,” in Elman, Y. and Gurock, J. S. (eds.) Hazon Nahum: Studies in Jewish Law, Thought, and History Presented to Dr. Norman Lamm (New York: Yeshiva University Press, 1997) 311–58.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz. “Autour de l’oeuvre théologique d’Anselme de Laon,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 1 (1929) 434–83.Google Scholar
Blomme, Robert. La doctrine du péché dans les écoles théologiques de la premiere moitié du XIIe siècle (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1958).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton. The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State College Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, David. “On the Intellect and the Rational Soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (1977) 207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, James. “Aristotle’s Politics and Ptolemy of Lucca,” Vivarium 40 (2002) 103–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobik, Joseph. Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. Medieval Logic: An Outline of its Development from 1250–c. 1400 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. “Notitia Intuitiva of Non Existents According to Peter Aureoli, O.F.M. (1322),” Franciscan Studies 8 (1948) 388–416.Google Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. “The System of Metaphysics of Alexander of Hales,” Franciscan Studies 5 (1945) 366–414.Google Scholar
Boh, Ivan. “Consequences,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 300–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boh, Ivan. “Epistemic and Alethic Iteration in Later Medieval Logic,” Philosophia naturalis 21 (1984) 492–506.Google Scholar
Boh, Ivan. Epistemic Logic in the Middle Ages (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Boh, Ivan. “Paul of Pergula on Suppositions and Consequences,” Franciscan Studies 25 (1965) 30–89.Google Scholar
Bohne, Winfried (ed.). Hrabanus Maurus und seine Schule (Fulda: Rabanus-Maurus-Schule, 1980).Google Scholar
Boissonade, Jean François. Anecdota graeca (Paris, 1833; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1962).Google Scholar
Boissonade, Jean François. Anecdota nova (Paris, 1844; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1962).Google Scholar
Boland, Vivian. Ideas in God According to Saint Thomas Aquinas: Sources and Synthesis (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Bolland, Johannes, Carnandet, Jean Baptiste, Henschenius, Godefridus, and Papenbroeck, Daniel von (eds.) Acta sanctorum quotquot toto orbe coluntur vel a catholicis scriptoribus celebrantur (Paris: Palme, 1863–1940).Google Scholar
Bolton, Brenda. Innocent III: Studies on Papal Authority and Pastoral Care (Aldershot: Variorum, 1995).Google Scholar
Bonin, Therese. Creation as Emanation. The Origin of Diversity in Albert the Great’s On the Causes and the Procession of the Universe (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Borchert, Ernst. Die Trinitätslehre des Johannes de Ripa (Munich: Schöningh, 1974).Google Scholar
Borst, Arno. “Ein Forschungsbericht Hermanns des Lahmen,” Deutsches Archiv 40 (1984) 379–477.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.An Anonymous Commentary on the Second Part of Alexander de Villa Dei’s Doctrinale (circa 1400),” in Pacheco, M. C. and Meirinhos, J. F. (eds.) Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale: actes du XIe Congrès international de philosophie médiévale de la Société internationale pour l’étude de la philosophie médiévale (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006) 1743–56.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Logica modernorum in Prague about 1400: The Sophistria Disputation “Quoniam quatuor” with a Partial Reconstruction of Thomas of Cleves’ Logica (Leiden: Brill, 2004).Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Peter of Mantua and his Rejection of Ampliatio and Restrictio,” in Lewry, O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983) 384–99.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Peter of Mantua’s Tract on appellatio and his Interpretation of Immanent Forms,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 231–52.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Peter of Mantua’s Treatise De veritate et falsitate, sive De taliter et qualiter,” in Bos, E. P. (ed.) Medieval Semantics and Metaphysics. Studies Dedicated to L. M. de Rijk (Nijmegen: Artistarium, 1985) 291–307.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Die Rezeption der Suppositiones des Marsilius von Inghen in Paris (Johannes Dorp) und Prag (ein anonymer Sophistria Traktat) um 1400,” in Hoenen, M. J. F. M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M. (eds.) Philosophie und Theologie des ausgehenden Mittelalters: Marsilius von Inghen und das Denken seiner Zeit (Leiden: Brill, 2000) 213–38.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Richard Billingham’s Logic in his Mirror of the Youngsters,” in Beets, F. and Gavray, M.-A. (eds.) Logique et ontologie: perspectives diachroniques et synchroniques (Liège: éditions Université de Liège, 2005) 73–94.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Richard Billingham’s Speculum puerorum, Some Medieval Commentaries and Aristotle,” Vivarium 45 (2007) 360–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, E. P.Thuo of Viborg and Marsilius of Inghen,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1999) 523–39.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P.Towards a Logic of Fiction: LudolphMeistermann of Lübeck,” in Aertsen, J. A. and Speer, A. (eds.) Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1998) 809–17.Google Scholar
Bos, Gerrit and Burnett, Charles. Scientific Weather Forecasting in the Middle Ages: The Writings of al-Kindi (London: Kegan Paul, 2000).Google Scholar
Bosdari, Filippo. Giovanni da Legnano, canonista e uomo politico del 1300 (Bologna, 1901).Google Scholar
Bosl, Karl. “Potens und Pauper,” in Bergengruen, A. and Deike, L. (eds.) Alteuropa und die Moderne Gesellschaft: Festschrift für Otto Brunner (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1963) 60–87.Google Scholar
Bosley, Richard and Tweedale, Martin (eds.). Basic Issues in Medieval Philosophy: Selected Readings Presenting the Interactive Discourses among Major Figures, 2nd edn (Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bossier, Fernand. “L’élaboration du vocabulaire philosophique chez Burgundio de Pise,” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Aux origines du lexique philosophique européen (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1997) 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossy, John. “Moral Arithmetic: Seven Sins into Ten Commandments,” in Leites, E. (ed.) Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 214–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottin, Francesco. “Gaetano da Thiene e i ‘calculatores’,” in Poppi, A. (ed.) Scienza e filosofia all’Università di Padova nel Quattrocento (Padua: Edizioni LINT, 1983) 125–34.Google Scholar
Bottin, Francesco. “Logica e filosofia naturale nelle opere di Paolo Veneto,” in Poppi, A. (ed.) Scienza e filosofia all’Università di Padova nel Quattrocento (Padua: Edizioni LINT, 1983) 85–124.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. “The Church Fathers and the Sentences of Peter Lombard,” in Backus, I. (ed.) The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists (Leiden: Brill, 1997) I: 113–64.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. Introduction à l’étude de saint Bonaventure (Paris: Vrin, 1988).Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. Introduction to the Works of Bonaventure, tr. Vinck, J. (Patterson, NJ: St. Anthony Guild Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. “Jean de la Rochelle – les oeuvres et les manuscripts,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 87 (1994) 205–15.Google Scholar
Bouhot, Jean Paul. Ratramne de Corbie: histoire littéraire et controverses doctrinales (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1976).Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. “Le besoin de métaphysique. Théologie et structure des métaphysiques médiévales,” in Solère, J.-L. and Kaluza, Z. (eds.) La servante et la consolatrice: la philosophie dans ses rapports avec la theólogie au Moyen âge (Paris: Vrin, 2002) 45–94.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. “Duns Scot: existe-t-il des passions de la volonté?,” in Besnier, B. et al. (eds.) Les passions antiques et médiévales: theories et critiques des passions, vol. I (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2003) 281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. être et representation: une génealogie de la métaphysique moderne à l’époque de Duns Scotus (XIIIe–XIVe siècle) (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boureau, Alain. Théologie, science et censure au XIIIe siècle: le cas de Jean Peckham (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1999).Google Scholar
Boureau, Alain and Piron, Sylvain. Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298): pensée scolastique, dissidence spirituelle et société (Paris: Vrin, 1999).Google Scholar
Bouvy, Jean. “La necessité de la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 28 (1961) 59–96.Google Scholar
Bouvy, Jean. “Les questions sur la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 27 (1960) 290–343.Google Scholar
Bowman, Leonard. “The Development of the Doctrine of the Agent Intellect in the Franciscan School of the Thirteenth Century,” Modern Schoolman 50 (1973) 251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. Dante Philomythes and Philosopher: Man in the Cosmos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. Perception and Passion in Dante’s Comedy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. Human Vices and Human Worth in Dante’s Comedy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.The Fourth Lateran Council and Manuals of Popular Theology,” in Hefferman, T. J. (ed.) The Popular Literature of Medieval England (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1985) 30–43.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.The Inter-Conciliar Period 1179–1215 and the Beginnings of Pastoral Manuals,” in Liotta, F. (ed.) Miscellanea, Rolando Bandinelli, Papa Alessandro III (Siena: Accademia senese degli intronati, 1986) 45–56.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.Pastoral Care, Clerical Education and Canon Law, 1200–1400 (London: Variorum, 1981).Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.The Quodlibets of St. Thomas and Pastoral Care,” The Thomist 38 (1974) 232–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.The Summa confessorum of John of Freiburg and the Popularization of the Moral Teaching of St. Thomas and some of his Contemporaries,” in Maurer, A. (ed.) St. Thomas Aquinas, 1274–1974: Commemorative Studies (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1974) II: 245–68.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.Summae confessorum,” in Bultot, R. (ed.) Les genres littéraires dans les sources théologiques et philosophiques médiévales: définition, critique et exploration (Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, 1982) 227–37.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E.The Summa summarum and some Other English Works of Canon Law,” in Kuttner, S. and Ryan, J. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Medieval Canon Law (Vatican: S. Congregatio de seminariis et studiorum universitatibus, 1965) 415–56.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.Die 13de Eeuwse Tractaten over Syncategorematische Termen (Meppel: Krips Repro, 1979).Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.Convertibility of Being and One in a Sophism Attributed to Robert Kilwardby,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1999) 117–38.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.English Tracts on Syncategorematic Terms from Robert Bacon to Walter Burley,” in Braakhuis, H. A. G. et al. (eds.) English Logic and Semantics from the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1981) 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.Kilwardby vs Bacon? The Contribution to the Discussion on Univocal Signification of Beings and Non-Beings Found in a Sophism Attributed to Robert Kilwardby,” in Bos, E. P. (ed.) Medieval Semantics and Metaphysics (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1985) 111–42.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.Paul of Pergula’s Commentary on the Sophismata of William Heytesbury,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 343–57.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.School Philosophy and Philosophical Schools. The Semantic-Ontological Views in the Cologne Commentaries on Peter of Spain, and the ‘Wegestreit’,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 20 (1989) 1–18.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G.The Views of William of Sherwood on some Semantical Topics and their Relation to those of Roger Bacon,” Vivarium 15 (1977) 111–42.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G. and Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (eds.). Marsilius of Inghen: Acts of the International Marsilius of Inghen Symposium (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1992).Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, Johannes. “Cicero and Augustine on the Passions,” Revue des études Augustiniennes 43 (1997) 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. “John Pecham and the Background of Aquinas’s De aeternitate mundi,” in Maurer, A. (ed.) St. Thomas Aquinas (1274–1974): Commemorative Studies (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1974) II: 11–71.Google Scholar
Brague, Remi (ed.). Saint Bernard et la philosophie (Paris: Cerf, 1993).Google Scholar
Brams, Jozef. La riscoperta di Aristotele in Occidente, tr. Tombolini, A. (Milan: Jaca, 2003).Google Scholar
Brams, Jozef and Vanhamel, Willy (eds.). Guillaume de Moerbeke: recueil d’études à l’occasion du 700e anniversaire de sa mort (1286) (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Brand, Paul. “The Age of Bracton,” Proceedings of the British Academy 89 (1996) 65–89.Google Scholar
Brands, Hartmut. “Referenztheorie und freie Logik im Spätmittelalter,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 102 (1995) 33–60.Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. A Guide to Eriugenian Studies: A Survey of Publications 1930–87 (Paris: Cerf, 1989).Google Scholar
Brehaut, Ernest. An Encyclopedist of the Dark Ages, Isidore of Seville (New York: Franklin, 1964).Google Scholar
Brenet, Jean-Baptiste. “Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait? Jean de Jandun lecteur d’Averroès,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 68 (2001) 310–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenet, Jean-Baptiste. Transferts du sujet: la noétique d’Averroès selon Jean de Jandun (Paris: Vrin, 2003).Google Scholar
Breuning, Wilhelm. Erhebung und Fall des Menschen nach Ulrich von Strassburg (Trier: Paulinus-Verlag, 1959).Google Scholar
Bridges, Geoffrey. Identity and Distinction in Petrus Thomae, O.F.M. (St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1959).Google Scholar
Brigué, Louis. Alger de Liège: un théologien de l’eucharistie au début du XIIe siècle (Paris: Gabalda, 1936).Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “From Antagonism to Assimilation. Syriac Attitudes to Greek Learning,” in Garsoian, N. et al. (eds.) East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, Center for Byzantine Studies, Trustees for Harvard University, 1980) 17–34.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “The Syriac Background to Ḥunayn’s Translation Techniques,” Aram 3 (1991) 139–62.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “The Syriac Commentary Tradition,” in Burnett, C. (ed.) Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts (London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1993) 3–18.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “A Syriac Intermediary for the Arabic Theology of Aristotle? In Search of a Chimera,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. Syriac Perspectives on Late Antiquity (London: Variorum Reprints, 1984).Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “Towards a History of Syriac Translation Technique,” in Lavenant, R. (ed.) Symposium Syriacum III: les contacts du monde syriaque avec les autres cultures (Rome: Pontificium Institutum Studiorium Orientalium, 1983) 1–14.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen. Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998).Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. The Medieval Idea of Marriage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Brooke, Rosalind B. (ed. and tr.). Scripta Leonis, Rufini et Angeli sociorum S. Francisci: The Writings of Leo, Rufinus and Angelo, Companions of St Francis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970; corrected edn 1990).Google Scholar
Brosch, Hermann Josef. Der Seinsbegriff bei Boethius mit besonderer Berücksichtigungder Beziehung von Sosein und Dasein (Innsbruck: Felizian Rauch, 1931).Google Scholar
Brousseau-Beuermann, Christine. “Les Questiones de Johannes de Wolve et les Sophismata artis grammaticae du ms. Paris BNF lat. 15037,” in Libera, A. and Jolivet, J. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains, aux origines de la Logica modernorum (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 91–105.Google Scholar
Brousseau-Beuermann, Christine. “Le sophisme anonyme ‘Amatus sum vel fui’ du codex Parisinus BN lat. 16135,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 61 (1991) 147–83.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey and Guilfoy, Kevin. The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Facts vs. Things: Adam Wodeham and the Later Medieval Debate about Objects of Judgment,” Review of Metaphysics 60 (2006) 597–642.Google Scholar
Brown, Barry. Accidental Being: A Study in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America, 1985).Google Scholar
Brown, D. Catherine. Pastor and Laity in the Theology of Jean Gerson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, George H.Bede the Educator (Jarrow: St. Paul’s Church, 1996).Google Scholar
Brown, George H.Bede, the Venerable (Boston: Twayne, 1987).Google Scholar
Brown, Mary Anthony. “The Role of the Tractatus de obligationibus in Mediaeval Logic,” Franciscan Studies 26 (1966) 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Peter. Augustine of Hippo (London: Faber and Faber, 1967).Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Gerard of Bologna on the Nature of the Good (Text and Commentary),” in Pickavé, M. (ed.) Der Logik des Transzendentalen: Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003) 285–303.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Guido Terrena and the Unity of the Concept of Being,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 3 (1992) 599–631.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Nicholas of Lyra’s Critique of Scotus’ Univocity,” in Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O. (eds.) Historia philosophiae medii aevi: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters: Festschrift für Kurt Flasch (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991) 115–27.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Peter of Candia on Believing and Knowing,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–7) 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Peter of Candia’s Hundred-Year ‘History’ of the Theologian’s Role,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991) 156–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Peter of Candia’s Sermons in Praise of Peter Lombard,” in Almagno, R. and Harkins, C. (eds.) Studies Honoring Ignatius Charles Brady, Friar Minor (St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1976).Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Richard Fishacre on the Need for Philosophy,” in Salinger-Link, R. (ed.) A Straight Path: Studies in Medieval Philosophy and Culture – Essays in Honor of Arthur Hyman (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1988) 23–35.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Richard of Conington and the Analogy of the Concept of Being,” Franziskanische Studien 48 (1966) 297–307.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Robert Cowton O.F.M. and the Analogy of the Concept of Being,” Franciscan Studies 31 (1971) 5–40.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F.Sources for Ockham’s Prologue to the Sentences (pt 1),” Franciscan Studies 26 (1966) 36–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Robert. “An Unpublished Funeral Oration of Anna Comnena,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 188 (n.s. 8) (1962) 1–12; repr. in R. Sorabji (ed.) Aristotle Transformed (London: Duckworth, 1990) 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummer, Rudolf. Bibliographia Lulliana: Ramon-Llull-Schrifttum 1870–1973 (Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1976).Google Scholar
Brundage, James. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James. Medieval Canon Law (London: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar
Brungs, Alexander. “Roland von Cremona O.P., die Geschichte des geistigen Lebens im frühen 13. Jahrhundert und die Definition der Tugend,” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Roma, magistra mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offerts au Père L. E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Gerardo. “Quaestiones I–XX a fratre Aegidio Romano Paduae disputatae in Capitulo Generali O.E.S.A. 1281,” Analecta Augustiniana 17 (1939–40) 125–50.Google Scholar
Brunner, Fernand. Métaphysique d’Ibn Gabirol et de la tradition platonicienne, ed. Schulthess, D. (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar
Brunner, Fernand. Platonisme et Aristotelisme: la critique d’Ibn Gabirol par St. Thomas d’Aquin (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1965).Google Scholar
Bucichowski, Waclaw. “Le principe d’individuation dans la question de Henri de Lubeck ‘Utrum materia sit principium individuationis’,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 21 (1975) 89–113.Google Scholar
Buijs, Joseph A. (ed.). Maimonides: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. “Buridan and Epistemic Paradox,” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978) 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Christoph. Aedificatio, fructus, utilitas. Johannes Gerson als Professor der Theologie und Kanzler der Universität Paris (Tübingen: Mohr, 1986).Google Scholar
Burie, Luc. “Proeve tot inventarisatie van de in handschrift of in druk bewaarde werken van de Leuvense theologieprofessoren uit de XVe eeuw,” in Eijl, E. and Black, A. (eds.) Facultas S. Theologiae Lovaniensis, 1432–1797 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1977) 221–37.Google Scholar
Burkard, Franz. Philosophische Lehrgehalte in Gabriel Biels Sentenzenkommentar unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner Erkenntnislehre (Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1974).Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. Adelard of Bath: An English Scientist and Arabist of the Early Twelfth Century (London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1987).Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Algorismi vel helcep decentior est diligentia: The Arithmetic of Adelard of Bath and his Circle,” in Folkerts, M. (ed.) Mathematische Probleme im Mittelalter: der lateinische und arabische Sprachbereich (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1996) 221–331.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Arabic into Latin: The Reception of Arabic Philosophy intoWestern Europe,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 370–404.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “The Coherence of the Arabic–Latin Translation Program in Toledo in the Twelfth Century,” Science in Context 14 (2001) 249–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Euclid and al-FārābĪ in MS Vatican Reg. Lat. 1268,” in Arnzen, R. and Thielmann, J. (eds.) Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea: Studies on the Sources, Contents and Influences of Islamic Civilization and Arabic Philosophy and Science (Leuven: Peeters, 2004) 411–36.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Hermann of Carinthia,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Charles. The Introduction of Arabic Learning into England (London: British Library, 1997).Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Physics before the Physics. Early Translations from Arabic of Texts Concerning Nature in MSS British Library, Additional 22719 and Cotton Galba E IV,” Medioevo 27 (2002) 53–109.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “‘Ptolemaeus in Almagesto dixit’: The Transformation of Ptolemy’s Almagest in its Transmission via Arabic into Latin,” in Böhme, H. and Toepfer, G. (eds.) Was ist Wissenschaft? Wissensformen der Antike und ihre Transformationen (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “The Works of Petrus Alfonsi: Questions of Authenticity,” Medium Aevum 66 (1997) 42–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Charles and Jacquart, Danielle (eds.). Constantine the African and ʿAli ibn al-ʿAbbas al-Magusi: The Pantegni and Related Texts (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. “Aquinas on ‘Spiritual Change’ in Perception,” in Perler, D. (ed.) Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 129–53.Google Scholar
Burr, David. Eucharistic Presence and Conversion in Late Thirteenth-Century Franciscan Thought (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1984).Google Scholar
Burr, David. Olivi and Franciscan Poverty: The Origins of the Usus Pauper Controversy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, David. Olivi’s Peaceable Kingdom: A Reading of the Apocalypse Commentary (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, David. The Persecution of Peter Olivi (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1976).Google Scholar
Burr, David. “Peter John Olivi and the Philosophers,” Franciscan Studies 31 (1971) 41–71.Google Scholar
Burr, David. The Spiritual Franciscans: From Protest to Persecution in the Century after Saint Francis (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Burrell, David. Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, Mark. Jean Gerson and “De Consolatione Theologiae” (1418): The Consolation of a Biblical and Reforming Theology for a Disordered Age (Tübingen: Mohr, 1991).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey. A Census ofMedieval Latin Grammatical Manuscripts (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1981).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey. Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of Partes orationis of the Modistae (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, John. The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Burton, Pierre-André. Bibliotheca Aelrediana Secunda: Une bibliographie cumulative (1962–1996) (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busard, H. L. L.Unendliche Reihen in A est unum calidum,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2 (1965) 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, Charles E.Al-Kindi and the Beginnings of Islamic Political Philosophy,” in Butterworth, C. (ed.) The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992) 14–32.Google Scholar
Buzzetti, Dino. “Linguaggio e ontologia nei commenti di autore bolognese al De tribus praedicamentis di William de Heytesbury,” in Buzzetti, D. (ed.) L’insengamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo (Bologna: Presso l’Istituto per la Storia dell’Università, 1992) 579–604.Google Scholar
Bydén, Börje. “‘Strangle Them with These Meshes of Syllogisms!’: Latin Philosophy in Greek Translations of the Thirteenth Century,” in Rosenqvist, J. O. (ed.) Interaction and Isolation in Late Byzantine Culture (Stockholm: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2004) 133–57.Google Scholar
Bydén, Börje. Theodore Metochites’ Stoicheiosis astronomike and the Study of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Early Palaiologan Byzantium (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2003).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion (New York: Zone Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Holy Feast, Holy Fast: The Religious Significance of Food to MedievalWomen (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity 200–1336 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel. “De la pensée grecque à la pensée byzantine,” in J.-F.Mattéi, (ed.) Encyclopédie philosophique universelle (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998) IV: 1362–84.Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel. “Georges Scholarios et le Paris. Gr. 1932: Jean Chortasménos, l’enseignement de la logique, le thomisme à Byzance,” in The Greek Script in the 15th and 16th Century (Athens: National Hellenic Research Foundation, 2000) 397–442.Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel. “Recherches sur le commentaire inédit de Théodore Prodrome aux Analytiques postérieurs, livre II d’Aristote,” Atti della Accademia Pontaniana n.s. 38 (1990) 313–38.Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel and Congourdeau, Marie-Hélène. Philosophie et sciences à Byzance de 1204 à 1453 (Leuven: Peeters, 2006).Google Scholar
Callaey, Frédégand. L’idéalisme franciscain spirituel au xive siècle: étude sur Ubertino de Casale (Leuven: Bureau du Recueil, 1911).Google Scholar
Callus, D. A.The Condemnation of St Thomas at Oxford. The Aquinas Society of London, Aquinas Paper 5 (London: Blackfriars Publications, 1955).Google Scholar
Callus, D. A.The Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford,” Proceedings of the British Academy 29 (1943) 229–81.Google Scholar
Callus, D. A.The Problem of the Unity of Form and Richard Knapwell, O.P.,” Mélanges offerts à étienne Gilson (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1959) 123–60.Google Scholar
Callus, D. A. (ed.). Robert Grosseteste: Scholar and Bishop (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Callus, D. A.The Treatise of John Blund on the Soul,” Autour d’Aristote: recueil d’études de philosophie ancienne et médiévale offert à Mgr. A. Mansion (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1955) 471–95.Google Scholar
Callus, D. A.Two Early Oxford Masters on the Plurality of Forms: Adam of Buckfield – Richard Rufus of Cornwall,” Revue neo-scholastique de philosophie 42 (1939) 411–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calma, Monica. “Pierre d’Ailly: le commentaire sur les Sentences de Pierre Lombard,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 139–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Averil. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Cameron, Margaret. “Boethius on Utterances, Understanding, and Reality,” in Marenbon, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfora, Davide. La controversia di Poggio Bracciolini e Guarino Veronese su Cesare e Scipione (Florence: Olschki, 2001).Google Scholar
Canning, Joseph. A History of Medieval Political Thought 300–1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Canning, Joseph. The Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelle, G. C.Amaury de Bène: étude sur son panthéisme formel (Paris: Vrin, 1932).Google Scholar
Cappuyns, Maieul. Jean Scot érigène: sa vie, son œuvre, sa penseé (Paris: De Brouwer, 1933).Google Scholar
Caputo, Nina. Nahmanides in Medieval Catalonia: History, Community and Messianism (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Carabine, Deirdre. John Scottus Eriugena (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Carfantan, Jerry (ed.). William, Abbot of St. Thierry: A Colloquium at the Abbey of St. Thierry (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1987).Google Scholar
Caron, Pier Giovanni. “Aequitas et interpretatio dans la doctrine canonique aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles,” in Kuttner, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medieval Canon Law (Vatican: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1971) 131–41.Google Scholar
Caron, Pier Giovanni. “Aequitas romana, ‘Misericordia’ patristica e ‘Epicheia’ aristotelica nella dottrina decretalistica del Duecento e Trencento,” Studia Gratiana 14 (1967) 309–47.Google Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “La critica contro l’astrologia di Nicole Oresme e la sua influenza nel Medioevo e nel Rinascimento,” Atti della Accademi nazionale, Classe di scienze morali 238 (1979) 543–685.Google Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “Mirabilia, scetticismo, e filosofia della natura nei Quodlibeta di Nicole Oresme,” Annali dell’Istituto e museo di storia della scienza di Firenze 9 (1984) 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “Les modi rerum … Encore une fois. Une source possible de Nicole Oresme: le commentaire sur le livre 1er des Sentences de Jean de Mirecourt,” in Caroti, S. and Celeyrette, J. (eds.) Quia inter doctores est magna dissensio: Les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVe siècle (Florence: Olschki, 2004) 195–222.Google Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “Nicole Oresme et les modi rerum,” Oriens–Occidens: Sciences, mathématiques et philosophie de l’Antiquité à l’âge classique 3 (2000) 115–44.Google Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “Oresme on Motion (Questiones super Physicam, III, 2–7),” Vivarium 31 (1993) 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroti, Stefano. “La position de Nicole Oresme sur la nature du mouvement (Quaestiones super Physicam III, 1–8): problèmes gnoséologiques, ontologiques et sémantiques,” Archives d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale du moyen âge 61 (1994) 303–85.Google Scholar
Caroti, Stefano and Grellard, Christophe (eds.). Nicolas d’Autrécourt et la faculté des arts de Paris (1317–1340) (Cesena: Stilgraf Editrice, 2006).Google Scholar
Carter, M. G.Sibawayhi (London: I. B. Tauris, 2004).Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla. “Predicare la penitenza: La Summa de poenitentia di Servasanto da Faenza,” in Dalla penitenza all’ ascolto delle confessioni: il ruolo dei frati mendicanti (Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 1996) 59–101.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla and Vecchio, Silvana. “La classificazione dei peccati tra settenario e decalogo (secoli XIII–XV),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 5 (1994) 331–95.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla and Vecchio, Silvana. I peccati della lingua: disciplina ed etica della parola nella cultura medievale (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1987).Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla and Vecchio, Silvana. I sette vizi capitali: storia dei peccati nel medioevo (Turin: Einaudi, 2000).Google Scholar
Casarella, Peter. Cusanus: The Legacy of Learned Ignorance (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Casey, Michael. A Thirst for God: Spiritual Desire in Bernard of Clairvaux’s Sermons on the Song of Songs (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1988).Google Scholar
Cassell, Anthony. An Historical Study with Accompanying Translations of Dante Alighieri’s Monarchia, Guido Vernani’s Refutation of the Monarchia composed by Dante, and Pope John XXII’s Bull Si fratrum (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Caster, Kevin. “William of Auvergne and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Real Distinction between Being and Essence,” in Hackett, J. et al. (eds.) Being and Thought in Aquinas (Binghamton, NY: Global Academic Publications, 2004) 75–108.Google Scholar
Catto, J. I. (ed.). The History of the University of Oxford, vol. I: The Early Oxford Schools (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Catto, J. I. (ed.). “Theology and Theologians 1220–1320,” in Catto, J. I. (ed.) The History of the University of Oxford (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984) I: 471–517.Google Scholar
Catto, J. I. (ed.). “Wyclif andWycliffism in Oxford, 1356–1430,” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) II: 175–261.Google Scholar
Catto, J. I. and Evans, Ralph (eds.). The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: The Late Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Cavigioli, Jean-Daniel. “Les écrits d’Heymericus de Campo (1395–1460) sur les œuvres d’Aristote,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 28 (1981) 293–371.Google Scholar
Cavigioli, Jean-Daniel and Imbach, Ruedi. “Quelques compléments aux catalogues des œuvres d’Heymericus de Campo,” Codices Manuscripti 7 (1981) 1–3.Google Scholar
Celeyrette, Jean and Mazet, Edmond. “La hiérarchie des degrés d’être chez Nicole Oresme,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 8 (1998) 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenci, Cesare. “Fr. Guglielmo de Falgar o Fr. Guglielmo Farinier?” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 78 (1985) 481–9.Google Scholar
Ceric, Mustafa. Roots of Synthetic Theology in Islam: A Study of the Theology of Abū Mansūr al-MāturĪdĪ (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1995).Google Scholar
Cesalli, Laurent. “Le ‘pan-propositionnalisme’ de Jean Wyclif,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 124–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesalli, Laurent. “Le réalisme propositionnel deWalter Burley,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 68 (2001) 155–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Ego Berengarius,” Journal of Theological Studies 40 (1989) 414–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Origen, Celsus, and the Resurrection of the Body,” Harvard Theological Review 41 (1948) 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Hugh. “Plantinga and the Contingently Possible,” Analysis 36 (1976) 106–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappuis, Marguerite, Kaczmarek, Ludger, and Pluta, Olaf. “Die philosophischen Schriften des Peter von Ailly: Authentizität und Chronologie,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 33 (1986) 593–615.Google Scholar
Charland, Thomas-Marie. Artes praedicandi: contribution à l’histoire de la rhétorique au Moyen Age (Paris: Vrin, 1936).Google Scholar
Chase, Steven. Angelic Wisdom: The Cherubim and the Grace of Contemplation in Richard of St. Victor (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Châtillon, Jean. “Achard de St Victor et le De discretione anime, spiritus et mentis,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 31 (1964) 7–35.Google Scholar
Châtillon, Jean. Théologie, spiritualité et métaphysique dans l’œuvre oratoire d’Achard de Saint-Victor (Paris: Vrin, 1969).Google Scholar
Chazen, Robert. Barcelona and Beyond: The Disputation of 1263 and its Aftermath (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Chejne, Anwar. Ibn Hazm (Chicago: Kazi Publications, 1982).Google Scholar
Chejne, Anwar. “Ibn Hazm of Cordova on Logic,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 104 (1984) 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheneval, Francis. “‘Utrum omnia eveniant de necessitate’: Textedition und Studie der gleichnamigen Quaestio von Thaddeus von Parma (Cod. Vat. Lat. 6768),” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 35 (1988) 175–99.Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique. “Maîtres et bacheliers de l’Université de Paris v. 1240. Description du manuscrit Paris, Bibl. Nat. lat. 15652,” études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale du XIIIe siècle 1 (1932) 11–39.Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique. La théologie au douzième siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1966).Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique. La théologie comme science au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1957).Google Scholar
Chittick, William. Imaginal Worlds: Ibn al-ʿArabĪ and the Problem of Religious Diversity (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Chittick, William. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-ʿArabĪ’s Metaphysics of Imagination (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, Michel. An Ocean without Shore: Ibn ʿArabĪ, the Book, and the Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Chodorow, Stanley. Christian Political Theory and Church Politics in the Mid-Twelfth Century: The Ecclesiology of Gratian’s Decretum (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo. Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000–1700, 2nd edn (New York: Norton, 1980).Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall. “The Medieval Latin Translations from the Arabic of the Elements of Euclid, with Special Emphasis on the Versions of Adelard of Bath,” Isis 44 (1953) 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clagett, Marshall. “Richard Swineshead and Late Medieval Physics,” Osiris 9 (1950) 131–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clagett, Marshall. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1959; repr. 1961).Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T.From Memory to Written Record, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Clarence Smith, J. A.Bartolo on the Conflict of Laws,” American Journal of Legal History 14 (1970) 157–74, 247–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, Peter. Burgundio von Pisa: Richter, Gesandter, Ubersetzer (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1974).Google Scholar
Classen, Peter. Gerhoch von Reichersberg: eine Biographie (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1960).Google Scholar
Clegg, Brian. The First Scientist: A life of Roger Bacon (New York: Carroll and Graf, 2003).Google Scholar
Clucas, Lowell. The Trial of John Italos and the Crisis of Intellectual Values in Byzantium in the Eleventh Century (Munich: Institut für Byzantinistik, Neugriechische Philologie und Byzantinische Kunstgeschichte der Universität, 1981).Google Scholar
Cochrane, Louise. Adelard of Bath: The First English Scientist (London: British Museum Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Code, Alan. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics as a Science of Principles,” Revue internationale de philosophie 51 (1997) 357–78.Google Scholar
Codellas, P. S.Nikephoros Blemmydes’ Philosophical Works and Teachings,” Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Philosophy (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1949) 1117–18.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerson D. “The Soteriology of Abraham Maimuni,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 35 (1967) 75–98; 36 (1968) 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Dominium in Thirteenth-and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke,” Political Studies 33 (1985) 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “FitzRalph’s Antimendicant ‘proposicio’ (1350) and the Politics of the Papal Court at Avignon,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 35 (1984) 376–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Jean de Ripa and the Oxford Calculators,” Mediaeval Studies 37 (1975) 130–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Janet. A History of Political Thought from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Medieval Discussions of Property: Ratio and Dominium according to John of Paris and Marsilius of Padua,” History of Political Thought 4 (1983) 209–28.Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Poverty, Property and Political Thought in Fourteenth-Century Scholastic Philosophy,” in Wenin, C. (ed.) L’homme et son univers au moyen age (Louvain-la-Neuve: éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1986) 845–55.Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Property and Poverty,” in Burns, J. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 607–48.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. “Habitus Revisited: A Reply to Cary Nederman,” Traditio 48 (1993) 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colish, Marcia. Peter Lombard (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Collins, Ann Ryan. Teacher in Faith and Virtue: Lanfranc of Bec’s Commentary on Saint Paul (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Eusebio. “Heimeric van de Velde entre Ramón Llull y Nicolas de Cusa,” in Vincke, J. (ed.) Spanische Forschungen der Görres-Gesellschaft (Münster: Aschendorff, 1963) XXI: 216–32.Google Scholar
Combes, André. “L’intensité des formes après Jean de Ripa,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 37 (1970) 17–147.Google Scholar
Combes, André. “La métaphysique de Jean de Ripa,” in Die Metaphysik im Mittelalter (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 2) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1963) 543–73.Google Scholar
Combes, André. “Présentation de Jean de Ripa,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 23 (1956) 145–242.Google Scholar
Conforti, Patrizia. “Hervé de Nédellec et les questiones ordinaires De cognitione primi principii,” Revue Thomiste 97 (1997) 63–82.Google Scholar
Conforti, Patrizia. “‘Naturali cognitione probare’: Natural and Theological Knowledge in Hervaeus Natalis,” in Aertesen, J. A. and Speer, A. (eds.) Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999) 614–21.Google Scholar
Congar, Yves. “Aspects ecclésiologiques de la querelle entre mendicants et séculiers dans la seconde moitié du XIIIe siècle et le début du XIVe siècle,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 28 (1961) 35–151.Google Scholar
Connolly, James. Jean Gerson: Reformer and Mystic (London: Herder, 1928).Google Scholar
Conrad, Lawrence I. (ed.). The World of Ibn Tufayl: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Hayy Ibn Yaczan (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Constable, Giles. The Reformation of the Twelfth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Constable, Giles and Kritzeck, James (eds.). Petrus Venerabilis, 1156–1956: Studies and Texts Commemorating the Eighth Centenary of his Death (Rome: Herder, 1956).Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Analogy and Formal Distinction: On the Logical Basis of Wyclif’s Metaphysics,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997) 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages,” in Newton, L. (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 369–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Le composizione metafisica dell’ente finito corporeo nell’ontologia di Thomas Sutton,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 2 (1991) 317–60.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Conoscenza e verità in Egidio Romano,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 3 (1992) 305–61.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Esistenza e verità: forme e strutture del reale in Paolo Veneto e nel pensiero filosofico del tardo medioevo (Rome: Edizioni dell’Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medioevo, 1996).Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Johannes Sharpe’s Ontology and Semantics: Oxford Realism Revisited,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 156–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Linguaggio e realtà nel commento alle Categorie di Robert Alyngton,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 4 (1993) 179–306.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Ontology in Walter Burley’s Last Commentary on the Ars Vetus,” Franciscan Studies 50 (1990) 121–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Paul of Venice on Individuation,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Paul of Venice’s Theory of Divine Ideas and its Sources,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14 (2003) 409–48.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.A Realist Interpretation of the Categories in the Fourteenth Century: The Litteralis sententia super Praedicamenta Aristotelis of Robert Alyngton,” in Newton, L. (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 317–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Significato e verità in Walter Burley,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11 (2000) 317–50.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Teoria degli universali e teoria della predicazione nel trattato De universalibus di William Penbygull: discussione e difesa della posizione di Wyclif,” Medioevo 8 (1982) 137–203.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Thomas Sutton’s Commentary on the ‘Categories’ according to Ms Oxford, Merton College 289,” in Lewry, P.O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1985) 173–213.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro D.Wyclif’s Logic and Metaphysics,” in Levy, I. C. (ed.) A Companion to John Wyclif (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 67–125.Google Scholar
Conticello, G. C. and Conticello, Vassa. La théologie byzantine et sa tradition (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002).Google Scholar
Contreni, John. “The Carolingian Renaissance: Education and Literary Culture,” in McKitterick, R. (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. II: c.700–c.900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) 709–57.Google Scholar
Conybeare, F. C., Harris, J. Rendel, and Lewis, Agnes Smith (ed.). The Story of Ahikar from the Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, Armenian, Ethiopic, Old Turkish, Greek and Slavonic Versions (London: C. J. Clay and Sons, 1898).Google Scholar
Cook, Michael. Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Coolman, Boyd. Knowing God by Experience: The Spiritual Senses in the Theology of William of Auxerre (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Cooper, John. Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Cooperson, Michael. “Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ,” in Leaman, O. (ed.) The Biographical Encyclopaedia of Islamic Philosophy (London: Thoemmes, 2006) I: 280–6.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick. A History of Philosophy (Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1946–75).Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn ʿArabĪ (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Côté, Antoine. “Guerric de Saint-Quentin et le problème de l’infinité divine,” in Bazán, B. C. et al. (eds.) Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen âge (Ottawa: Legas, 1995) 1132–48.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Academic and Intellectual Worlds of Ockham,” in Spade, P. V. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to his Life and Writings (Leiden: Brill, 1978).Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Categories, Michael of Massa and Natural Philosophy at Paris, 1335–1340,” in Biard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.) La tradition médiévale des Catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles): XIIIe Symposium européen de logique et de sémantique médiévales (Leuven: Peeters, 2003) 243–60.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Covenant and Causality in Pierre d’Ailly,” Speculum 46 (1971) 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Dialectic of Omnipotence in the High and Late Middle Ages,” in Rudavsky, T. (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 243–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Early Career of Nicole Oresme,” Isis 91 (2000) 542–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtenay, William J.John of Mirecourt and Gregory of Rimini on Whether God Can Undo the Past,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 39 (1972) 224–53; 40 (1973) 147–74.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Necessity and Freedom in Anselm’s Conception of God,” Analecta Anselmiana 4 (1975) 39–64.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Quaestiones in Sententias of Michael de Massa, OESA. A Redating,” Augustiniana 45 (1995) 191–207.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Radulphus Brito, Master of Arts and Theology,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 76 (2005) 131–58.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Reflections on Vat. Lat. 1086 and Prosper of Reggio Emilia O.E.S.A.,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.The Registers of the University of Paris and the Statutes Against the ‘Scientia Occamica’,” Vivarium 29 (1991) 13–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.A Revised Text of Robert Holcot’s Quodlibetal Dispute on Whether God is Able to Know More Than He Knows,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 53 (1971) 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Schools and Scholars in Fourteenth-Century England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J.Some Notes on Robert of Halifax, O.F.M.,” Franciscan Studies 33 (1973) 135–42.Google Scholar
Cousin, P.Abbon de Fleury-sur-Loire: un savant, un pasteur, un martyr à la fin du Xe siècle (Paris: Lethielleux, 1954).Google Scholar
Cousin, Victor. Ouvrages inédits d’Abélard pouvant servir à l’histoire de la philosophie scolastique en France (Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1836).Google Scholar
Coutre, R. A.The Use of Epikeia in Natural Law: Its Early Developments,” église et theólogie 4 (1973) 71–93.Google Scholar
Couvreur, Gilles. Les pauvres ont-ils des droits? Recherches sur le vol en cas d’extrême nécessité depuis la Concordia de Gratien (1140) jusqu’à Guillaume d’Auxerre († 1231) (Rome: Libreria Editrice dell’Università Gregoriana, 1961).Google Scholar
Couvreur, Gilles. “Pauvreté et droits des pauvres à la fin du XIIe siècle,” in Couvreur, G. (ed.) La pauvreté: des sociétés de pénurie à la société d’abondance (Paris: Fayard, 1964) 13–37.Google Scholar
Covington, Michael. Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowdrey, H. E. J.The Enigma of Archbishop Lanfranc,” Haskins Society Journal 6 (1994) 129–52.Google Scholar
Cowdrey, H. E. J.Lanfranc: Scholar, Monk, and Archbishop (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Virginia and Ward, John O. (eds.). The Rhetoric of Cicero in its Medieval and Early Renaissance Commentary Tradition (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Craemer-Ruegenberg, Ingrid. Albert the Great (Leipzig: Benno, 2005).Google Scholar
Craig, Edward (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden: Brill, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremascoli, Giuseppe. “La ‘Summa’ di Rolando da Cremona, Il testo del prologo,” Studi Medievali 16 (1975) 825–76.Google Scholar
Creutz, Rudolf. “Die Medizinisch–naturaphilosophische Aphorismen und Kommentar des Magister Urso Salernitanus,” Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Medizin 5 (1936) 1–192.Google Scholar
Creutz, Rudolf. Urso, der Letzte des Hochsalerno, Arzt, Philosoph, Theologe (Berlin: Ebering, 1934).Google Scholar
Creytens, Raymond. “Autour de la littérature des correctoires,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 12 (1942) 313–30.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science 1100–1700 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953; 2nd edn, 1962).Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. Medieval Islamic Political Thought (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia and Hinds, Martin. God’s Caliph: Religious Authority in the First Centuries of Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Absolute Time: Peter John Olivi and the Bonaventurean Tradition,” Medioevo 27 (2002) 261–300.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Infinity, Continuity, and Composition: The Contribution of Gregory of Rimini,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (1998) 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Philosophy of Mind,” in Williams, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 263–84.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Theodore. Roger Bacon: The Problem of the Soul in his Philosophical Commentaries (Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1950).Google Scholar
Cullen, Christopher. Bonaventure (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, F. A.Richard of Middleton, O.F.M. on esse and essence,” Franciscan Studies 30 (1970) 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusato, Michael F.The Renunciation of Power as a Foundational Theme in Early Franciscan History,” in M.Gosman, et al. (eds.) The Propagation of Power in the Medieval West (Groningen: Forsten, 1997) 265–86.Google Scholar
Cusato, Michael F.To Do Penance / Facere penitentiam,” The Cord 57 (2007) 3–24.Google Scholar
Daftary, Farhad. The IsmāʿĪlĪs: Their History and Doctrines (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Dahan, Gilbert (ed.). Gersonide en son temps (Leuven: Peeters, 1991).Google Scholar
Daiber, Hans. “Die Aristotelesrezeption in der syrischen Literatur,” in Kuhn, D. and Stahl, H. (eds.) Die Gegenwart des Altertums (Heidelberg: Edition Forum, 2001) 327–45.Google Scholar
Daiber, Hans. Bibliography of Islamic Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar
Daiber, Hans. Bibliography of Islamic Philosophy: Supplement (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar
Daiber, Hans. “ṭQosā ibn Lūqā (9. Jh.) über die Einteilung der Wissenschaften,” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften 6 (1990) 93–129.Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C.Gilbert of Stratton. An Early Oxford Defense of Aquinas’s Teaching on the Possibility of a Beginningless World,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 5 (1994) 259–96.Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C.Henry of Harclay on the Infinite,” Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (1984) 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, Richard C.Medieval Discussions of the Eternity of the World (Leiden: Brill, 1990).Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C.The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C.Robert Grosseteste’s Scientific Works,” Isis 52 (1961) 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, Richard C. and Argerami, Omar (eds.). Medieval Latin Texts on the Eternity of the World (Leiden: Brill, 1991).Google Scholar
Dalfert, Ingolf. Malum: Theologische Hermeneutik des Bösen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008).Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. Alan of Lille’s Textes inédits (Paris: Vrin, 1965).Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “Algazel dans l’occident latin,” in Un trait d’union entre l’orient et l’occident: al-Ghazzali et Ibn Maimoun (Agadir: Académie royale du Maroc, 1986) 125–46.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “Un fragment du procès des Amauriciens,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 18 (1950–1) 325–36.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “Notes sur les traductions médiévales des œuvres philosophiques d’Avicenne,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 19 (1952) 337–58.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “L’obit de Raoul Ardent,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 15/17 (1940) 403–5.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “Pseudo-Aristotle, ‘De elementis’,” in Kraye, J. et al. (eds.) Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages: The Theology and Other Texts (London: Warburg Institute, 1986) 63–83.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. “Translations and Translators,” in Benson, R. L. and Constable, G. (eds.) Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982) 421–62.Google Scholar
Daly, Lowrie J.The Political Theory of John Wyclif (Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Daly, Saralyn R.. “Peter Comestor: Master of Histories,” Speculum 32 (1957) 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, Renn, Jürgen, and McLaughlin, Peter (eds.). Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics (Dordrecht: Springer, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. “From Latin Antiquity to the Arab Middle Ages: The Commentaries and the Harmony between the Philosophies of Plato and Aristotle,” in Honnefelder, L. et al. (eds.) Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption in lateinischen Mittelalter (Münster: Aschendorf, 2005) 45–69.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. “Historiographie du platonisme médiéval: le cas de saint Thomas,” in Bonino, S.-T. (ed.) Saint Thomas au XXe siècle (Colloque du centenaire de la “Revue thomiste”) (Paris: éditions Saint-Paul, 1994) 198–217.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. (ed.). The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. (ed.). Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale (Turin: Einaudi, 2005).Google Scholar
Daniels, Augustinus. Quellenbeiträge und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Gottesbeweise im XIII. Jahrhundert (Münster: Aschendorff, 1909).Google Scholar
Daniels, Augustinus. “Wilhelm von Ware über das menschliche Erkenntnis,” Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie: Festgabe zum 60. Geburtstag Clemens Baeumker (Münster: Aschendorff, 1913) 309–18.Google Scholar
D’Anna, Gabriella. “Abelardo e Cicerone,” Studi Medievali 10 (1969) 333–419.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert. Moses Maimonides (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Herbert. Proofs for Eternity, Creation, and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert. “The Relation between Averroes’Middle and Long Commentaries on the De Anima,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1997) 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Brian. The Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Davies, Brian and Leftow, Brian (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Oliver. Meister Eckhart: Mystical Theologian (London: SPCK, 1991).Google Scholar
Davis, Adam. The Holy Bureaucrat: Eudes Rigaud and Religious Reform in Thirteenth-Century Normandy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Davis, Charles. “An Early Florentine Political Theorist: Fra Remigio de’ Girolami,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104 (1960) 662–76.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles. “Roman Patriotism and Republican Propaganda: Ptolemy of Lucca and Pope Nicholas III,” Speculum 50 (1975) 411–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Avray, David. Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Avray, David. The Preaching of the Friars: Sermons Diffused from Paris before 1300 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Davy, M.-M.Les sermons universitaires parisiens de 1230–1231: contribution à l’histoire de la prédication médiévale (Paris: Vrin, 1931).Google Scholar
Dawson, James Doyne. “William of Saint-Amour and the Apostolic Tradition,” Mediaeval Studies 40 (1978) 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, James Doyne. “Richard FitzRalph and the Fourteenth-Century Poverty Controversies,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 34 (1983) 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Asúa, M.Medicine and Philosophy in Peter of Spain’s Commentary on ‘De animalibus’,” in Steel, C. et al. (eds.) Aristotle’s Animals in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
de Barcelona, Martin. “Nicolaś Bonet (†1343), Tourangeau, doctor proficuus, O.M.,” études Franciscaines 37 (1925) 638–57.Google Scholar
de Callatäy, Godefroid. Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʿ: A Brotherhood of Idealists on the Fringe of Orthodox Islam (Oxford: Oneworld, 2005).Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. La fable mystique: XVI–XVII siècle (Paris: Gallimard, 1982).Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. Heterologies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
de la Torre, Bartholomew. Thomas Buckingham and the Contingency of Futures: The Possibility of Human Freedom (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987).Google Scholar
de Lagarde, Georges. La naissance de l’espirit laïque au declin du moyen age (Leuven: Nauwelaerts, 1956–70).Google Scholar
de Lagarde, Georges. “La philosophie sociale d’Henri de Gand et de Godefroid de Fontaines,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge18–20 (1943–5) 73–142.Google Scholar
de Leemans, Pieter. “Peter of Auvergne on Aristotle’s De motu animalium and the MS Oxford, Merton College 275,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 71 (2004) 129–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Les Abstractiones d’Hervé le Sophiste (Hervaeus Sophista),” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 52 (1986) 163–230.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Apollinaire Offredi critique de Pierre de Mantoue: Le Tractatus de instanti et la logique du changement,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 253–91.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Les Appellationes de Jean le Page,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 51 (1984) 193–255.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. Introduction à la mystique rhénane d’Albert le Grand à Maître Eckhart (Paris: OEIL, 1984).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “La littérature des Abstractiones et la tradition logique d’Oxford,” in Lewry, P. O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983) 63–114.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “La littérature des Sophismata dans la tradition terministe parisienne de la seconde moitié du XIIIe siècle,” in Asztalos, M. (ed.) The Editing of Theological and Philosophical Texts from the Middle Ages (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, 1986) 213–44.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. Métaphysique et noétique: Albert le Grand (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “The Oxford and Cambridge Traditions in Logic,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Libera, Alain. Penser au Moyen âge (Paris: Seuil, 1991).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. La philosophie médiévale (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. La querelle des universaux de Platon à la fin du Moyen Age (Paris: Seuil, 1996).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Questions de réalisme: sur deux arguments antiockhamistes de John Sharpe,” Revue de metaphysique et de morale 97 (1992) 83–110.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. La référence vide: théories de la proposition (Paris: Seuil, 2002).Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Supposition naturelle et appellation: aspects de la sémantique parisienne au XIIIe siècle,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Libera, Alain. “Ulrich de Strasbourg, lecteur d’Albert le Grand,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 32 (1985) 105–36.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain and Rosier, Irène. “La pensée linguistique médiévale,” in Auroux, S. (ed.) Histoire des idées linguistiques (Liège: Mardaga, 1992) II: 115–86.Google Scholar
de Matteis, Maria Consiglia. La “teologia politica comunale” di Remigio de’ Girolami (Bologna: Pàtron, 1977).Google Scholar
de Montclos, Jean. Lanfranc et Bérenger: la controverse eucharistique du XIe siècle (Leuven: Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense, 1971).Google Scholar
de Renzi, Salvatore. Collectio Salernitana (Naples: Dalla tipografia del Filiatre-Sebezio, 1852–9; repr. Bologna: Forni Editore, 1967).Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Each Man’s Ass is not Everybody’s Ass: On an Important Item in Thirteenth-Century Semantics,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.John Buridan on Universals,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 97 (1992) 35–59.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1962–7).Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.On the Genuine Text of Peter of Spain’s ‘Summule Logicales’, Part II: Simon Faversham (d. 1306) as a Commentator of the Tract I–V of the Summule,” Vivarium 6 (1968) 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.On the Genuine Text of Peter of Spain’s ‘Summule Logicales’, Part IV: The Lectura Tractatum by Guillelmus Arnaldi, Master of Arts at Toulouse (1235–1244). With a Note on the Date of Lambert of Auxerre’s Summule,” Vivarium 7 (1969) 120–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.The Origins of the Theory of the Properties of Terms,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 161–73.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Peter Abailard’s Semantics and his Doctrine of Being,” Vivarium 24 (1986) 85–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.The Place of Billingham’s Speculum puerorum in the 14th and 15th Century Logical Tradition,” Studia Mediewistyczne 16 (1975) 99–153.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Richard Billingham’s Works on Logic,” Vivarium 14 (1976) 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Semantics and Metaphysics in Gilbert of Poitiers: A Chapter of Twelfth-Century Platonism,” Vivarium 26 (1988) 73–112; 27 (1989) 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Semantics in Richard Billingham and Johannes Venator,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 167–84.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Some Earlier Parisian Tracts on Distinctiones Sophismatum (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Some 14th Century Tracts on the Probationes terminorum: Martin of Alnwick, O.F.M., Richard Billingham, Edward Upton and Others (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Some New Evidence on Twelfth-Century Logic: Alberic and the School of Mont Ste. Geneviève (Montani),” Vivarium 4 (1966) 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Some Thirteenth-Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation I,” Vivarium 12 (1974) 94–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Some Thirteenth-Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation II,” Vivarium 13 (1975) 22–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.Works by Gerald Ot (Gerardus Odonis) on Logic, Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy Rediscovered in Madrid, Bibl. nac. 4229,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 60 (1993) 173–93.Google Scholar
De Smet, Daniel. La quiétude de l’intellect: néoplatonisme et gnose ismaélienne dans l’œuvre de HamĪd ad-DĪn al-KirmānĪ, Xe/XIe s. (Leuven: Peeters, 1995).Google Scholar
de Töth, Pietro Tommaso. Storia di S. Chiara da Montefalco secondo un antico documento dell’anno 1308 (Siena, 1908).Google Scholar
de Tourtoulon, Pierre. Placentin, sa vie, ses oeuvres: étude sur l’enseignement du droit romain au moyen âge dans le midi de la France (Paris: Librairie Maresq, 1896; repr. Glashütten im Taunus: Detlev Auvermann, 1972).Google Scholar
de Vaux, Roland. Notes et textes sur l’avicennisme latin aux confins des XIIe et XIIIe siècles (Paris: Vrin, 1934).Google Scholar
de Vooght, Paul. L’hérésie de Jean Huss (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1960).Google Scholar
de Vries-Van der Velden, Eva. Théodore Métochite: une réévaluation (Amsterdam: Gieben, 1987).Google Scholar
De Wulf, Maurice. Un théologien-philosophe du XIIIe siècle: étude sur la vie, les œuvres et l’influence de Godefroid de Fontaines (Brussels: Hayez, 1904).Google Scholar
de Zedelghem, Amédée. “L’attritionisme d’Abélard,” Estudis Franciscans 35 (1925).Google Scholar
Deane, Herbert A.The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Déchanet, Jean. William of St Thierry: The Man and his Work (Spencer, MA: Cistercian Publications, 1972).Google Scholar
Decker, Bruno. Die Gotteslehre des Jakob von Metz: Untersuchungen zur Dominikanertheologie zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts (Münster: Aschendorff, 1967).Google Scholar
Decorte, Jos. “Der Einfluss der Willenspsychologie des Walter von Brügge OFM auf die Willenspsychologie und Freiheitlehre das Heinrich von Gent,” Franziskanische Studien 65 (1983) 215–40.Google Scholar
Degen, Rainer. “Galen im Syrischen: eine übersicht über die syrische überlieferung,” in Nutton, V. (ed.) Galen: Problems and Prospects (London: Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 1981) 131–66.Google Scholar
DeGregorio, Scott (ed.). Innovation and Tradition in the Writings of the Venerable Bede (Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
del Punta, Francesco. ‘La Logica di R. Feribrigge nella tradizione manoscritta italiana,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 53–85.Google Scholar
del Punta, Francesco, Donati, Silvia, and Luna, Concetta. “Egidio Romano,” in Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1993) XLII: 319–41.Google Scholar
Delaney, David. Law and Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe. “Le dossier anti-matrimonial de l’Adversus Jovinianum et son influence sur quelques écrits latins du XIIe siècle,” Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951) 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe. Pierre Lombard: sa vie, ses oeuvres, sa morale (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1961).Google Scholar
Delio, Ilia. Simply Bonaventure: An Introduction to his Life, Thought and Writings (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Delorme, Ferdinand. “Le Cardinal Vital Du Four: huit questions disputées sur le problème de la connaissance,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 2 (1927) 333–7.Google Scholar
Delumeau, Jean. L’aveu et le pardon: les difficultés de la confession xiiie–xviiie siècle (Paris: Fayard, 1990).Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Apo tēn historia tou byzantinou thŌmismou: PlēthŌn kai ThŌmas Akuinatēs (Athens: Parousia, 2004).Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Demetrius Cydones’ Translation of Bernardus Guidonis’ List of Thomas Aquinas’ Writings and the Historical Roots of Byzantine Thomism,” in Speer, A. and Wirmer, D. (eds.) 1308: 36. Kölner Mediaevistentagung (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010).Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Demetrios Kydones’ Translation of the Summa theologiae,” Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 32 (1982) 311–20.Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Further Evidence on the Ancient, Patristic, and Byzantine Sources of Barlaam the Calabrian’s Contra Latinos: à propos de A. Fyrigos (ed.), Barlaam Calabro, Opere contro i Latini,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 96 (2003) 83–122.Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Georgios Gemistos – Plethon’s Dependence on Thomas Aquinas’ Summa contra Gentiles and Summa Theologiae,” Archiv für mittelalterliche Philosophie und Kultur 12 (2006) 276–341.Google Scholar
Demetracopoulos, John A.Nicholas Cabasilas’s Quaestio de rationis valore: an anti-Palamite Defense of SecularWisdom,” Byzantina 19 (1998) 53–93.Google Scholar
Demetrakopulos, Andronikos K.Bibliotheca ecclesiastica (Leipzig, 1866; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965).Google Scholar
Denery, Dallas. Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World: Optics, Theology and Religious Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denifle, Henri and Chatelain, émile (eds.). Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (Paris: Delalain, 1889–97).Google Scholar
Denzinger, Heinrich (ed.). Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum (Freiburg: Herder, 1963).Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Life’s Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. Physiologia: Philosophy of Nature in Descartes and the Aristotelians (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Devisse, Jean. Hincmar, archevêque de Reims, 845–882 (Geneva: Droz, 1975–6).Google Scholar
Dhanani, Alnoor. The Physical Theory of Kalām (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
di S. Brocardo, Nilo. “Il profilo storico di Giovanni Baconthorp,” Ephemerides Carmeliticae 2 (1948) 431–543.Google Scholar
Díaz Esteban, Fernando (ed.). Abraham Ibn Ezra γ su tiempo: actas del simposio internacional (Madrid: Asociación Espanola de Orientalistas, 1990).Google Scholar
Dickson, Marcel and Dickson, Christiane. “Le Cardinal Robert de Courson, sa vie,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 9 (1934) 53–142.Google Scholar
Dietterle, Johann. “Die Summae confessorum (sive de casibus conscientiae) von inhren Anfängen an bis zu Silvester Prierias (unter besonderer Berücksichtigung über den Ablass),” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 24 (1903) 353–74, 520–48; 25 (1904) 248–72; 26 (1905) 59–81, 350–62; 27 (1906) 70–83, 166–88, 296–310, 431–42; 28 (1907) 401–31.Google Scholar
Dijs, Judith. “Two Anonymous 12th-Century Tracts on Universals,” Vivarium 28 (1990) 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P.‘Suppositio’ in Petrus Hispanus: Linguistic Theories and Models,” in Bursill-Hall, G. L. (ed.) De ortu grammaticae: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Thomas. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dod, Bernard G.Aristoteles Latinus,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 45–79.Google Scholar
Dodd, Tony. The Life and Thought of Siger of Brabant, Thirteenth-Century Parisian Philosopher: An Examination of his Views on the Relationship of Philosophy and Theology (Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R.The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R.Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolnikowski, Edith Wilks. Thomas Bradwardine: A View of Time and a Vision of Eternity in Fourteenth-Century Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Donati, Silvia. “The Anonymous Commentary on the Physics in Erfurt,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 72 (2005) 232–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, Silvia. “La dottrina delle dimensioni indeterminate in Egidio Romano,” Medioevo 14 (1988) 149–233.Google Scholar
Donati, Silvia. “Guglielmo di Clifford († 1306) e alcuni commenti anonimi ai Libri naturales del ms. Cambridge, Peterhouse, 157 (De anima, De generatione et corruptione, Meteora, De somno et vigilia, De vegetabilibus),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 19 (2008) 501–618.Google Scholar
Donati, Silvia. “Per lo studio dei commenti alla Fisica del XIII secolo. I: Commenti di probabile origine inglese degli anni 1250–1270 ca.,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 2 (1991) 361–441; 4 (1993) 25–133.Google Scholar
Donati, Silvia. “Studi per una cronologia delle opera di Egidio Romano. I: Le opera prima del 1285 – I commenti aristotelici,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 1 (1990) I–III.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine. écrits de la “petite ećole porrétaine” (Paris: Vrin, 1962).Google Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine. “Guillaume Peyraut, vie et œuvres,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 18 (1948) 162–236.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine. “Hugues éthérien et Léon Toscan,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 19 (1952) 67–134.Google Scholar
d’Onofrio, Giulio (ed.). Lanfranco di Pavia e l’Europa del secolo XI, nel IX centenario della morte (1089–1989): atti del convegno internazionale di studi (Rome: Herder, 1993).Google Scholar
d’Ors, Angel. “Petrus Hispanus O.P., Auctor Summularum,” Vivarium 35 (1997) 21–71; 39 (2001) 209–54; 41 (2003) 249–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine. “Sobre las obligationes de Juan de Holanda,” Anuario filosófico 31 (1988) 33–70.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine. “Sobre las obligationes de Richard Lavenham,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 58 (1991) 253–78.Google Scholar
Dossat, Yves. Les crises de l’inquisition toulousaine au XIIIe siècle, 1233–1273 (Bordeaux: Bière, 1959).Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. “Notulae bibliographicae de quibusdam operibus Fr. Ioannis Pecham, O.F.M.,” Antonianum 8 (1933) 307–28, 425–59.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. “L’œuvre scolastique de Richard de Conington,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 29 (1937) 396–442.Google Scholar
Douie, D. L.Archbishop Pecham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Douie, D. L.Three Treatises on Evangelical Poverty by Fr. Richard Conyngton, Fr. Walter Chatton and an Anonymous from MS V. iii. 18 in Bishop Cosin’s library, Durham,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 24 (1931) 341–69.Google Scholar
Dowd, John D.Matthew of Aquasparta’s De productione rerum and its Relation to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Bonaventure,” Franciscan Studies 34 (1974) 34–73.Google Scholar
Doyle, Matthew. Bernard of Clairvaux and the Schools: The Formation of An Intellectual Milieu in the First Half of the Twelfth Century (Spoleto: Fondazione Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 2005).Google Scholar
Draelants, Isabelle. “Une mise au point sur les œuvres d’Arnoldus Saxo,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 34 (1992) 163–80; 35 (1993) 130–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreiling, Raymund. Der Konzeptualismus in der Universalienlehre des Petrus Aureoli (Münster: Aschendorff, 1913).Google Scholar
Dressler, Fridolin. Petrus Damiani. Leben und Werk (Rome: Herder, 1954).Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. Fabula: Explorations into the Uses of Myth in Medieval Platonism (Leiden: Brill, 1974).Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. “The Lyrical Compositions of Philip the Chancellor,” Studi Medievali 28 (1987) 563–92.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. “Thierry of Chartres,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 358–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dronke, Peter. Women Writers of the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Farabi, Emanation, and Metaphysics,” in Morewedge, P. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992) 127–48.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Ghazali’s Conception of the Agent in the Tahafut and the Iqtisad: Are People Really Agents?,” in Montgomery, J. E. (ed.) Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy: From the Many to the One (Leuven: Peeters, 2006) 425–40.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Kindi’s Ethics,” Review of Metaphysics 47 (1993) 329–57.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Razi’s Conception of the Soul: Psychological Background to his Ethics,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5 (1996) 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Razi’s Ethics,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997) 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “The Human Soul’s Individuation and its Survival after the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation between Body and Soul,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000) 259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “‘Shay’ or ‘Res’ as Concomitant of ‘Being’ in Avicenna,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 12 (2001) 125–42.Google Scholar
D’souza, Joachim. “William of Alnwick and the Problem of Faith and Reason,” Salesianum 35 (1973) 425–88.Google Scholar
Duba, William. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Peter Auriol’s Commentary on the Sentences,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 12 (2001) 549–72.Google Scholar
Duba, William. “The Authenticity of Francis of Marchia’s Quodlibet: The Testimony of Paris, BNF, Ms. lat. 16110,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duba, William. “Continental Franciscan Quodlibeta after Scotus,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 569–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duba, William O. and Schabel, Chris (eds.). Special issue on Gerald of Odo, Vivarium 47.1 (2009).Google Scholar
Düchting, Reinhard. Sedulius Scottus: seine Dichtungen (Munich: Fink, 1968).Google Scholar
Dufeil, Michel-Marie. Guillaume de Saint-Amour et la polémique universitaire parisienne, 1250–1259 (Paris: Picard, 1972).Google Scholar
Duffy, John. “Hellenistic Philosophy in Byzantium and the Lonely Mission of Michael Psellos,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002) 139–56.Google Scholar
Duggan, Charles. Twelfth-Century Decretal Collections (London: Athlone Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre. Le système du monde: histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic (Paris: Hermann, 1913–59).Google Scholar
Duin, Joannes Josef. “La bibliothèque philosophique de Godefroid de Fontaines,” Estudios Lulianos 3 (1959) 21–36, 137–60.Google Scholar
Duin, Joannes Josef. La doctrine de la providence dans les écrits de Siger de Brabant; textes et étude (Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1954).Google Scholar
Dumeige, Gervais. Richard de Saint-Victor et l’idée chrétienne de l’amour (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1952).Google Scholar
Dümmler, Ernst (ed.). Poetae Latini aevi Carolini (Berlin: Weidmann, 1881–1923).Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.Did Duns Scotus Change his Mind on the Will?,” in Aertsen, J. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 719–94.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.New Questions by Thomas Wylton,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 10 (1998) 341–81.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.The Origin of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995) 149–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.Univocity of the Concept of Being in the Fourteenth Century: John Duns Scotus and William of Alnwick,” Mediaeval Studies 49 (1987) 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.The Univocity of the Concept of Being in the Fourteenth Century: II. The De Ente of Peter Thomae,” Mediaeval Studies 50 (1988) 186–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D.William ofWare, Richard of Conington and the Collationes Oxonienses of John Duns Scotus,” in Honnefelder, L. et al. (eds.) John Duns Scotus. Metaphysics and Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 1996) 59–85.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, Jean. “The Commentary of John of Paris (Quidort) on the Sentences,” in Evans, G. R. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: Current Research (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 131–47.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, Jean. “Guido Vernani of Rimini’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics,” Traditio 44 (1988) 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, Jean. A Hound of God: Pierre de la Palud and the Fourteenth-Century Church (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duneau, Jean-François. “Quelques aspects de la pénétration de l’hellénisme dans l’empire perse sassanide (IVe–VIIe siècles),” in Gallais, P. and Riou, Y.-J. (eds.) Mélanges offerts à René Crozet (Poitiers: Société d’études médiévales, 1966) I: 13–22.Google Scholar
Dunphy, William. “Peter of Auvergne and the Twofold Efficient Cause,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunphy, William. “The Similarities between Certain Questions of Peter of Auvergne’s Commentary on the Metaphysics and the Anonymous Commentary on the Physics Attributed to Siger of Brabant,” Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953) 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunyā, Sulaymān. Al-Shaykh Muḥammad ʿAbduh bayna al-falāsifa wa-al-kalāmĪγγĪn (Cairo: ʿĪsa al-BābĪ al-ḤalabĪ, 1958).Google Scholar
Durling, R. J.Corrigenda and Addenda to Diels’ Galenica, II, Codices miscellanei,” Traditio 37 (1981) 373–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutton, Blake D.Al-GhazālĪ on Possibility and the Critique of Causality,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10 (2001) 23–46.Google Scholar
Dutton, Blake D.Nicholas of Autrecourt andWilliam of Ockham on Atomism, Nominalism, and the Ontology of Motion,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5 (1996) 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Paul E.The Mystery of the Missing Heresy Trial of William of Conches (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2006).Google Scholar
Dutton, Paul E. and Luhtala, Anneli. “Eriugena in Priscianum,” Mediaeval Studies 56 (1994) 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvornik, Francis.Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1966).Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S.The Foundations of Freedom in Later Medieval Philosophy: Giles of Rome and his Contemporaries,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006) 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eardley, Peter S.The Problem of MoralWeakness, the Propositio Magistralis, and the Condemnation of 1277,” Mediaeval Studies 68 (2006) 161–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, Bruce S.Invention and Reform in Latin Planetary Astronomy,” in Herren, M. W. et al. (eds.) Latin Culture in the Eleventh Century. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medieval Latin Studies (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) I: 264–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, Bruce S.The Revival of Planetary Astronomy in Carolingian and Post-Carolingian Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Animal est omnis homo: Questions and Sophismata by Peter of Auvergne, Radulphus Brito, William Bonkes, and Others,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 63 (1993) 145–208.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Boethius of Dacia: Science is a Serious Game,” Theoria 66 (2000) 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Can Equivocation Be Eliminated?,” Studia Mediewistyczne 18 (1977) 103–24.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi: A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies (Leiden: Brill, 1981).Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “The Dead Man is Alive,” Synthese 40 (1979) 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Early Supposition Theory (12th–13th century),” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “George Pachymeres and the Topics,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 66 (1996) 169–85.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “The Present King of France Wears Hypothetical Shoes with Categorical Laces. Twelfth Century Writers on Well-Formedness,” Medioevo 7 (1981) 91–113.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Radulphus Brito on the Metaphysics,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 28 (2000) 450–92.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “Radulphus Brito: The Last of the Great Arts Masters or: Philosophy and Freedom,” in und, J. A. AertsenSpeer, A. (eds.) Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000) 231–51.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. “The Sophism ‘Rationale est animal’ by Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 24 (1978) 85–120.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten (ed.). Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1995).Google Scholar
Ebbesen, StenTalking About What Is No More: Texts by Peter of Cornwall (?), Richard of Clive, Simon of Faversham, and Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 55 (1987) 135–68.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, StenTermini accidentales concreti: Texts from the Late Thirteenth Century,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 53 (1986) 37–150.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten“What Must One Have an Opinion About,” Vivarium 30 (1992) 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten and Pinborg, Jan. “Bartholomew of Bruges and his Sophisma on the Nature of Logic,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 39 (1981) iii–xxvi, 1–80.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, StenGennadios and Western Scholasticism: Radulphus Brito’s Ars Vetus in Greek Translation,” Classica et Mediaevalia 33 (1981–2) 263–319.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, StenStudies in the Logical Writings Attributed to Boethius de Dacia,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 3 (1970) 1–54.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten and Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Petrus de Alvernia + Boethius de Dacia: Syllogizantem ponendum est terminos,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 75 (2004) 161–218.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten and Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Robertus Anglicus on Peter of Spain,” in Angelelli, I. and Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. (eds.) Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain (Hildesheim: Olms, 2000) 60–95.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten and Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Le trivium à la Faculté des Arts,” in Holtz, L. and O.Weijers, (eds.) L’enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des Arts (Paris et Oxford, XIIIe–XVe siècles) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997) 98–128.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten and Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Two Roberts and Peter of Spain,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 67 (1997) 200–88.Google Scholar
Eckermann, Willigis. Der Physikkommentar Hugolins von Orvieto OESA: ein Beitrag zur Erkenntnislehre des spätmittelalterlichen Augustinismus (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1972).Google Scholar
Eckermann, Willigis. Schwerpunkte und Wirkungen des Sentenzenkommentars Hugolins von Orvieto O.E.S.A. (Würzburg: Augustinus, 1990).Google Scholar
Eckermann, Willigis. Wort und Wirklichkeit: Das Sprachverständnis in der Theologie Gregors von Rimini und Sein Weiterwirken in der Augustinerschule (Würzburg: Augustinus, 1978).Google Scholar
Eckermann, Willigis and Hucker, Bernd Ulrich (eds.). Hugolin von Orvieto: Ein spätmittelalterlicher Augustinertheologe in seiner Zeit (Cloppenburg: Runge, 1992).Google Scholar
Edwards, Raymond. “Themes and Personalities in Sentence Commentaries at Oxford in the 1330s,” in Evans, G. R. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: Current Research (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 379–93.Google Scholar
Efros, Israel. Studies in Medieval Jewish Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Ehrig-Eggert, Carl. Die Abhandlung über den Nachweis der Natur des Möglichen von Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdĪ (gest. 974 A.D.) (Frankfurt: Institut für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, 1990).Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz. “Nikolaus Trivet, sein Leben, seine Quodlibet und seine Quaestiones Ordinariae,” Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, suppl. 2 (1923) 1–63.Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz. Der Sentenzenkommentar Peters von Candia, des Pisaner Papstes Alexanders V (Münster: Aschendorff, 1925).Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz. “Die Spiritualen, ihr Verhältnis zum Franziskanerorden und den Fraticellen,” Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters 1 (1885) 509–69; 2 (1886) 106–64; 3 (1887) 553–623; 4 (1888) 1–190.Google Scholar
Ehlers, Joachim. Hugo von St Victor: Studien zum Geschichtsdenken und der Geschichtsschreibung des 12. Jahrhunderts (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1973).Google Scholar
Eisen, Robert. Gersonides on Providence, Covenant, and the Jewish People (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Y.Reason and Emotion in Duties of the Heart,” Daat 7 (1981) 5–35.Google Scholar
El-Bizri, Nader (ed.). Epistles of the Brethren of the Purity. The Ikhwān al Ṣafāʿ and their Rasāʿil: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Elderidge, Laurence. “Changing Concepts of Church Authority in the Later Fourteenth Century: Pierre Ceffons of Clairvaux and William of Woodford, OFM,” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 48 (1978) 170–8.Google Scholar
Elford, Dorothy. “William of Conches,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 308–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elie, Hubert. Le complexe significabile (Paris: Vrin, 1936).Google Scholar
Ellard, Peter. The Sacred Cosmos: Theological, Philosophical, and Scientific Conversations in the Twelfth- Century School of Chartres (Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Elm, Kaspar (ed.). Bernhard von Clairvaux: Rezeption und Wirkung im Mittelalter und in der Neuzeit (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994).Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (ed.). Just War Theory (New York: New York University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Emden, A. B.A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957–9).Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles.Dieu, la foi et la théologie chez Durand de Saint-Pourçain,” Revue Thomiste 99 (1999) 659–99.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles.La théologie trinitaire des Evidentiae contra Durandum de Durandellus,” Revue Thomiste 97 (1997) 173–218.Google Scholar
Emery, Kent.Reading theWorld Rightly and Squarely: Bonaventure’sDoctrine of the Cardinal Virtues,” Traditio 39 (1983) 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endres, Josef.Honorius Augustodunensis: Beitrag zur Geschichte des geistigen Lebens im 12. Jahrhundert (Munich: Kempten, 1906).Google Scholar
Endres, Josef.Manegold von Lautenbach, ‘modernorum magister magistrorum’,” Historisches Jahrbuch 25 (1904) 168–76.Google Scholar
Endres, Josef.Petrus Damiani und die weltliche Wissenschaft (Münster: Aschendorff, 1910).Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Der arabische Aristoteles und sein Leser: Physik und Theologie im Weltbild Alberts des Grossen (Münster: Aschendorff, 2004).Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Averrois Opera: A Bibliography of Editions and Contributions to the Text,” in Aertsen, J. A. and Endress, G. (eds.) Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition: Sources, Constitution, and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126–1198) (Leiden: Brill, 1999) 339–81.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Building the Library of Arabic Philosophy: Platonism and Aristotelianism in the Sources of al-KindĪ,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.The Circle of al-Kindi,” in Endress, G. and Kruk, R. (eds.) The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism (Leiden: Research School CNWS, 1997) 43–76.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Grammatik und Logik: arabische Philologie und griechische Philosophie im Widerstreit,” in Mojsisch, B. (ed.) Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1986) 163–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Mathematics and Philosophy in Medieval Islam,” in Hogendijk, J. P. and Sabra, A.I. (eds.) The Enterprise of Science in Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 121–76.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Mattā b. Yūnus,” in Gibb, H. A. R. et al. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn (Leiden: Brill, 1960–2004) VI: 844–6.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Proclus Arabus: zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio theologica in arabischer Ubersetzung (Beirut: Orient-Institut der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 1973).Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.Die wissenschaftliche Literatur,” in Gätje, H. and Fischer, W. (eds.) Grundriss der Arabischen Philologie (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1987–92) II: 400–506, III: 3–152.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard.The Works of Yahya Ibn ʿAdi: An Analytical Inventory (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1977).Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard and Gutas, Dimitri. A Greek and Arabic Lexicon: Materials for a Dictionary of the Medieval Translations from Greek into Arabic (Leiden: Brill, 1992–).Google Scholar
Engels, Joseph. “Thomas Cantimpratensis redivivus,” Vivarium 12 (1974) 124–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppenstein, Simon.Abraham Maimuni: sein Leben und seine Schriften (Berlin: Louis Lamm Verlag, 1914).Google Scholar
Eran, Amira.Abraham Ibn Daud’s Definition of Substance and Accident,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1997) 228–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermatinger, Charles.Averroism in Early Fourteenth Century Bologna,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermatinger, Charles.John of Jandun in his Relations with Arts Masters and Theologians,” in Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1969) 1173–84.Google Scholar
Ermini, Giuseppe.I trattati della guerra e della pace di Giovanni da Legnano (Imola, 1923).Google Scholar
Etzkorn, Girard.Franciscus de Mayronis: A Newly Discovered Treatise on Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–97) 15–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzkorn, Girard.The Grades of the Form according to Roger Marston, O.F.M.,” Franziskanische Studien 44 (1962) 418–54.Google Scholar
Etzkorn, Girard. “John of Reading on the Existence and Unicity of God, Efficient and Final Causality,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 125–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzkorn, Girard. “John Pecham, O.F.M.: A Career of Controversy,” in King, E. B. et al. (eds.) Monks, Nuns, and Friars in Mediaeval Society (Sewanee, TN: Press of the University of the South, 1989) 71–82.Google Scholar
Etzkorn, Girard and Andrews, Robert. “Tortosa Cathedral 88: A ‘Thomas Wylton’ Manuscript and the Question on the Compatibility of Multiple Accidents in the Same Subject,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 32 (1994) 57–99.Google Scholar
Etzwiler, James P.Baconthorpe and Latin Averroism: The Doctrine of the Unique Intellect,” Carmelus 18 (1971) 235–92.Google Scholar
Etzwiler, James P.John Baconthorpe, ‘Prince of the Averroists’,” Franciscan Studies 36 (1976) 148–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzwiler, James P.The Nature of Theological Knowledge According to Paul of Perugia, O.Carm. (fl. 1344),” Carmelus 34 (1987) 135–75.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R.Anselm (London: Chapman, 1989).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Anselm and Talking about God (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Augustine on Evil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Bernard of Clairvaux (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.A Concordance to the Works of Saint Anselm (Millwood, NY: Kraus, 1984).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Fifty Key Medieval Thinkers (New York: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R.John Wyclif: Myth and Reality (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R. (ed.). Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.The Mind of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.Why the Fall of Satan?,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 45 (1978) 130–46.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.A Work of ‘Terminist Theology’? Peter the Chanter’s De tropis loquendi and Some Fallacies,” Vivarium 20 (1982) 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. La nozione metafisica di partecipazione secondo S. Tommaso d’Aquino, 3rd edn (Turin: Società editrice internazionale, 1963; repr. Segni: Editrice del Verbo Incarnato, 2005).Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. Participation et causalité selon S. Thomas d’Aquin (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1961).Google Scholar
Fages, Pierre-Henri. Histoire de Saint Vincent Ferrier, apôtre de l’Europe, 2nd edn (Paris: Picard, 1901).Google Scholar
Fairweather, E. R. (ed.). A Scholastic Miscellany: Anselm to Occam (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Faix, Gerhard. Gabriel Biel und die Brüder vom Gemeinsamen Leben: Quellen und Untersuchungen zu Verfassung und Selbstverständnis des Oberdeutschen Generalkapitels (Tübingen: Mohr, 1999).Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. Al-Farabi: Founder of Islamic Neoplatonism: His Life, Works and Influence (Oxford: Oneworld, 2002).Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. “The Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God,” Muslim World 47 (1957) 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. Ethical Theories in Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid. A History of Islamic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Faral, Edmond. “Les ‘Responsiones’ de Guillaume de Saint-Amour,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 25–6 (1950–1) 337–94.Google Scholar
Farr, William E.John Wyclif as Legal Reformer (Leiden: Brill, 1974).Google Scholar
Farthing, John. Thomas Aquinas and Gabriel Biel: Interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas in German Nominalism on the Eve of the Reformation (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Fedele, Pio. “Aequitas Canonica,” Apollinaris 51 (1978) 415–38.Google Scholar
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. Astrologia e scienza: la crisi dell’aristotelismo sul cadere del Trecento e Biagio Pelacani da Parma (Florence: Vallecchi, 1979).Google Scholar
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. “La classification des mathématiques d’après le prologue de l’Expositio super Theorica Planetarum de l’averroiste Thaddée de Parme (Bologne, 1318),” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Manuels, programmes de cours et techniques d’enseignement dans les universités médiévales (Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut d’études médiévales de l’Université catholique de Louvain, 1994) 137–82.Google Scholar
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. “Il commento di Angelo di Fossambrone al De tribus praedicamentis di Guglielmo Heytesbury,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 359–74.Google Scholar
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. “L’exorde de l’Arithmetica de Boèce et le Commentaire de l’avérroîste Thaddée de Parme (1318),” in Bonnefous, E. and Galonnier, A. (eds.) Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs (Leuven: éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 2003) 57–71.Google Scholar
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. (ed.). Filosofia, scienza e astrologia nel Trecento Europeo: Biagio Pelacani Parmense (Padua: Il Poligrafo, 1992).Google Scholar
Feldman, Seymour. “Abravanel on Maimonides’ Critique of the Kalam,” Maimonidean Studies 1 (1990) 5–25.Google Scholar
Feldman, Seymour. “A Debate Concerning Determinism in Late Medieval Jewish Philosophy,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 51 (1984) 15–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Seymour. “The Theory of Eternal Creation in Hasdai Crescas and Some of his Predecessors,” Viator 11 (1980) 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felten, Franz J. (ed.). Hrabanus Maurus: Gelehrter, Abt von Fulda, und Erzbischof vonMainz (Mainz: Publikationen Bistum Mainz, 2006).Google Scholar
Fenton, Paul. Philosophie et exégèse dans Le Jardin de la métaphore de Moïse Ibn ʿEzra (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Ferrari, Cleophea. “Der Duft des Apfels: Abū l-Faraj ʿAbdallāh ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib und sein Kommentar zu den Kategorien des Aristoteles,” in Celluprica, V. and Costa, C. D’Ancona (eds.) Aristotele e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici (Napoli: Bibliopolis, 2004) 85–106.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Sante. I tempi, la vita, le dottrine di Pietro d’Abano: Saggio storico-filosofico (Genoa: Tipografia R. Istituto Sordomuti, 1900).Google Scholar
Ferruolo, Stephen. The Origins of the University: The Schools of Paris and their Critics 1100–1215 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Fichtenau, Heinrich. “Magister Petrus von Wien,” Beiträge zur Mediävistik 1 (1975) 218–38.Google Scholar
Fidora, Alexander. Die Wissenschaftstheorie des Dominicus Gundissalinus: Voraussetzungen und Konsequenzen des zweiten Anfangs der aristotelischen Philosophie im 12. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidora, Alexander and Bruna, Maria Jesus Soto. “‘Gundisalvus’ ou ‘Dominicus Gundisalvi’? Algunas observaciones sobre un reciente articulo de Adeline Rucquoi,” Estudios eclesiasticos 76 (2001) 467–73.Google Scholar
Filthaut, Ephrem. Roland von Cremona und die Anfänge der Scholastik im Predigerorden: ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte der älteren Dominikaner (Vechta i.O.: Albertus Magnus Verlag der Dominikaner, 1936).Google Scholar
Filthaut, Ephrem. (ed.). Seuse-Studien: Heinrich Seuse, Studien zum 600. Todestag, 1366–1966 (Cologne: Albertus Magnus Verlag, 1966).Google Scholar
Finkelstein, L. (ed.) Rab Saadia Gaon (New York: Arno Press, 1944; repr. 1988).Google Scholar
Finnegan, Mary. The Women of Helfta: Scholars and Mystics (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Finnis, John. (ed.). Natural Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1991).Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Fisher, John. “Hugh of St. Cher and the Development of Mediaeval Theology,” Speculum 31 (1956) 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Noel. “Walter Chatton on the Univocity of Being: A Reaction to Peter Aureoli and William Ockham,” Franciscan Studies 31 (1971) 88–177.Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. Aufklärung im Mittelalter? Die Verurteilung von 1277 (Mainz: Dieterich, 1989).Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. Nikolaus von Kues: Geschichte einer Entwicklung: Vorlesungen zur Einführung in seine Philosophie (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1998).Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. (ed.). Von Meister Dietrich zu Meister Eckhart (Hamburg: Meiner, 1987).Google Scholar
Fleming, John. “The ‘Collations’ of William of Saint-Amour against S. Thomas,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 32 (1965) 132–8.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M.The Faculty of Arts,” in Catto, J. I. et al. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984) 369–99.Google Scholar
Flint, V. I. J.Honorius Augustodunensis of Regensburg (Aldershot: Variorum, 1995).Google Scholar
Flint, V. I. J.The ‘School of Laon’: A Reconsideration,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 43 (1976) 89–110.Google Scholar
Flood, David. “Assisi’s Rules and People’s Needs,” Franzikanische Studien 66 (1984) 91–104.Google Scholar
Flood, David. Francis of Assisi and the Franciscan Movement (Quezon City, Philippines: FIA Contact Publications, 1989).Google Scholar
Flores, Juan Carlos. Henry of Ghent: Metaphysics and the Trinity (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques. “Education and Learning,” in Fouracre, P. (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. I: c.500–c.700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 735–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques. Isidore de Séville et la culture classique dans l’Espagne wisigothique, 2nd edn (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1984).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques. Tradition et actualité chez Isidore de Séville (London: Variorum, 1988).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Resianne. “Abraham Ibn Daud’s Polemics against Muslims and Christians,” in Roggema, B. et al. (eds.) The Three Rings, Textual Studies in the Historical Trialogue of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Leuven: Peeters, 2005).Google Scholar
Fontaine, Resianne. In Defence of Judaism: Abraham Ibn Daud. Sources and Structure of ha-Emunah ha-Ramah (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1990).Google Scholar
Forhan, Kate L.The Political Theory of Christine de Pizan (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
Forster, Karl. Die Verteidigung der Lehre des heiligen Thomas von der Gottesschau durch Johannes Capreolus (Munich: Karl Zink, 1955).Google Scholar
Forster, Regula. Das Geheimnis der Geheimnisse: die arabischen und deutschen Fassungen des pseudoaristotelischen Sirr al-asrār / Secretum secretorum (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2006).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, William. Aristotle on Emotion, 2nd edn (London: Duckworth, 2003).Google Scholar
Fortin, John R.Clarembald of Arras as a Boethian Commentator (Kirksville, MO: Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fournier, Paul. “Le cardinal Guillaume de Peyre de Godin,” Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes 86 (1925) 100–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Marvin. Interpreting Maimonides: Studies in Methodology, Metaphysics, and Moral Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Fraisse, Otfried. Moses Ibn Tibbons Kommentar zum Hohenlied und sein poetologisch-philosophisches Programm (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Raymond. Natural Law and Positive Law (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Franco, Abel. “Avempace, Projectile Motion, and Impetus Theory,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2004) 521–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Daniel H.Anger as a Vice: A Maimonidean Critique of Aristotle’s Ethics,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990) 269–81.Google Scholar
Frank, Daniel H.Maimonides and Medieval Jewish Aristotelianism,” in Frank, D and Leaman, O. (eds.) Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Daniel H. and Leaman, Oliver (eds.). Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Daniel H. and Leaman, Oliver (eds). History of Jewish Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Frank, Daniel H., Leaman, Oliver, and Manekin, Charles (eds.). A Reader in Jewish Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.The Ashʿarite Ontology I: Primary Entities,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9 (1999) 165–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard M.Attribute, Attribution, and Being: Three Islamic Views,” in Morewedge, P. (ed.) Philosophies of Existence Ancient and Medieval (New York: Fordham University Press, 1982) 258–78.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.The Autonomy of the Human Agent in the Teaching of ʿAbd al-Jabbār,” Le Muséon 95 (1982) 323–55.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.Can God Do What Is Wrong?,” in Rudavsky, T. (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard M.Creation and the Cosmic System: al-Ghazâlî and Avicenna (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universit ätsverlag, 1992).Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.Al-Ghazali and the Ashʿarite School (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.Islamic Mysticism, Theology, and Philosophy: Texts and Studies on the Development of Kalam, ed. Gutas, D. (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.The Metaphysics of Created Being According to Abū al-Hudhayl al-ʿAllāf: A Philosophical Study of the Earliest Kalām (Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut in het Nabije Oosten, 1966).Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.The Neoplatonism of? ğahm ibn Ṣafwān,” Le Muséon 78 (1965) 395–424.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M.The Use of the Enneads by John of Scythopolis,” Le Muséon 100 (1987) 101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, William. “Duns Scotus on Autonomous Freedom and Divine Co-Causality,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2 (1992) 142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, William and Wolter, Allan B.. Duns Scotus, Metaphysician (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fransen, Gérard. Décrétales et les collections de décrétales (Turnhout: Brepols, 1972).Google Scholar
Fraser, Kyle A.Demonstrative Science and the Science of Being qua Being,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22 (2002) 43–82.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Abelard on Rhetoric,” in Mews, C. J. et al. (eds.) Rhetoric and Renewal in the Latin West 1100–1540: Essays in Honour of John O. Ward (Leiden; Brill, 2003) 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.The Commentaries on Cicero’s De Inventione and Rhetorica ad Herennium by William of Champeaux,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 17 (1976) 1–39.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 11 (1973) 1–57.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Petrus Helias on Rhetoric,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 13 (1974) 31–41.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.The Priscian Commentary from the second half of the Twelfth Century: Ms Leiden BPL 154,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 12 (1990) 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.The Promisimus,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Royal Academy, 1999) 191–205.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Some Notes on the Grammar of William of Conches,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 37 (1980) 21–41.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Speculative Grammar,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 177–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Tractatus Glosarum Prisciani in Ms. Vat. Lat. 1486,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 21 (1977) 27–44.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin M.Universal Grammar According to Some Twelfth c. Grammarians,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M., Fredborg Karin and Kneepkens, C. H.. “Grammatica Porretana,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 57 (1988) 11–67.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea. “On Mixture and Mixables,” in Mansfeld, J. and Haas, F. (eds.) Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004) 289–314.Google Scholar
Freeman, Ann.Theodulf of Orléans: Charlemagne’s Spokesman against the Second Council of Nicaea (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freppert, Lucan. The Basis of Morality According to William Ockham (Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad. “Les Sciences dans les communautés juives médiévales de Provence: leur appropriation, leur rôle,” Revue des études Juives 152 (1993) 29–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad. (ed.). Studies on Gersonides: A Fourteenth-Century Jewish Philosopher-Scientist (Leiden: Brill, 1992).Google Scholar
Friedländer, Michael. Essays on the Writings of Abraham ibn Ezra (London: Society of Hebrew Literature, 1877; repr. Jerusalem: Mitshuf, 1963).Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L.Andreas de Novocastro (fl. 1358) on Divine Omnipotence and the Nature of the Past: I Sentences, Distinction Forty Five, Question Six,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 64 (1994) 101–50.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L.Dominican Quodlibetal Literature, ca. 1260–1330,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 401–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Russell L.Intellectual Traditions in the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350 (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L.Peter Auriol on Intentions and Essential Predication,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1999) 415–30.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L.Trinitarian Theology and Philosophical Issues: Trinitarian Texts from the Late Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 72 (2001) 89–168.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. and Nielsen, Lauge (eds.). Special issue on Peter Auriol, Vivarium 38 (2000).Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. and Schabel, Chris (eds.). Francis of Marchia, Theologian and Philosopher: A Franciscan at the University of Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. and Schabel, ChrisFrancis of Marchia’s Commentaries on the Sentences: Question List and State of Research,” Mediaeval Studies 63 (2001) 31–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frugoni, Chiara. “Female Mystics, Visions, and Iconography,” in Bornstein, D. and Rusconi, R. (eds.) Women and Religion in Medieval and Renaissance Italy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996) 130–64.Google Scholar
Brocchieri, Fumagalli Beonio, Teresa, Maria. Durando di S. Porziano. Elementi filosofici della terza redazione del ‘Commento alle Sentenze’ (Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1969).Google Scholar
Brocchieri, Fumagalli Beonio, Teresa, Maria and Simonetta, Stefano (eds.). John Wyclif: logica, teologia, politica (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2003).Google Scholar
Furlani, Giuseppe. “Di una presunte versione araba di alcuni scritti di Porfirio e di Aristotele,” Rendiconti della R. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Classe di sc. mor., stor., e filol.) 6 (1926) 205–13.Google Scholar
Fussenegger, Geroldus. “‘Littera septem sigillorum’ contra doctrinam Petri Ioannis Olivi edita,” Archivum franciscanum historicum 47 (1954) 45–53.Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov M. and Woods, John (eds.). Handbook to the History of Logic, vol. II (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008).Google Scholar
Gabler, Darius. Die semantischen und syntaktischen Funktionen im Tractatus “De modis significandi sive grammatica speculativa” des Thomas von Erfurt: die Probleme der mittelalterlichen Semiotik (Bern: Lang, 1987).Google Scholar
Gabriel, Astrik. The Educational Ideas of Vincent of Beauvais (Notre Dame, IN: Mediaeval Institute, University of Notre Dame, 1956).Google Scholar
Gabriel, Astrik. Vinzenz von Beauvais, ein mittelalterlicher Erzieher (Frankfurt: Knecht, 1967).Google Scholar
Gabrieli, Francesco. “L’opera di Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ,” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 13 (1931–2) 197–247.Google Scholar
Gál, Gedeon. “Gulielmi de Ware, O.F.M. doctrina philosophica per summa capita proposita,” Franciscan Studies 14 (1954) 155–80, 265–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gál, Gedeon. “Opiniones Richardi Rufi Cornubiensis a Censore Reprobatae,” Franciscan Studies 35 (1975) 136–93.Google Scholar
Gál, Gedeon. “Petrus Thomae’s Proof for the Existence of God,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998) 115–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gál, Gedeon. “Quaestio Ioannis de Reading de necessitate specierum intelligibilium: defensio doctrinae Scoti,” Franciscan Studies 29 (1969) 66–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gál, Gedeon. “Viae ad exsistentiam Dei probandum in doctrina Richari Rufi,” Franziskanische Studien 38 (1956) 177–202.Google Scholar
Gál, Gedeon and Wood, Rega. “Richard Brinkley and his Summa logicae,” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980) 59–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Clarence. Canon Law and the Christian Community: The Role of Law in the Summa aurea of Cardinal Hostiensis (Rome: Università Gregoriana, 1978).Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M.Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76 (1994) 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galle, Griet. “A Comprehensive Bibliography on Peter of Auvergne,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 42 (2000) 53–79; 47 (2005) 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galle, Griet. “Peter of Auvergne on the Unicity of the World,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 68 (2001) 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galle, Griet. “Peter of Auvergne’s Question as to Whether or Not the Heaven is Generated and Perishable,” in Aertsen, J. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 535–76.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. Boèce. Opuscula sacra (Leuven: Peeters, 2007).Google Scholar
Galston, Miriam. Politics and Excellence: The Political Philosophy of Alfarabi (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambra, José Miguel. “El compromiso de existencia y la teoría de la predicación en la obra de Gualterio Burley,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 63 (1996) 139–70.Google Scholar
Gammersbach, Suitbert. Gilbert von Poitiers und seine Prozesse im Urteil der Zeitgenossen (Cologne: Böhlau, 1959).Google Scholar
Ganz, David. “The Debate on Predestination,” in Gibson, M. T. and Nelson, J. L. (eds.) Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom, 2nd edn (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990) 283–302.Google Scholar
Ganz, David. “Theology and the Organisation of Thought,” in McKitterick, R. (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. II: c. 700– c. 900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995) 758–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “Defending Aristotle/Defending Society in Early 17th C Paris,” in Zittel, C. and Detel, W. (eds.) Wissensideale und Wissenskulturen in der frühen Neuzeit (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2002) 135–60.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. Descartes Embodied (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
García Lescún, Eliseo. La teología trinitaria de Gregorio de Rimini: Contribución a la historia de la escolástica tardía (Burgos: Ediciones Aldecos, 1970).Google Scholar
Garcías Palou, Sebastián. Ramon Llull y el Islam (Palma de Mallorca: Gráficas Planisi, 1981).Google Scholar
Garnett, George. Marsilius of Padua and ‘The Truth of History’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, Richard. “Peter Damian on Divine Power and the Contingency of the Past,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997) 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Le Mariage en Occident: les moeurs et le droit (Paris: Cerf, 1987).Google Scholar
Gaughan, William. The Social Theories of Saint Antoninus from the Summa Theologica (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Gauthier, Léon. Ibn Thofäil, sa vie, ses oeuvres (Paris: Leroux, 1909; repr. Paris: Vrin, 1983).Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine. “Notes sur les débuts (1225–1240) du premier ‘averroïsme’,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 66 (1982) 322–73.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine. “Notes sur Siger de Brabant,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 67 (1983) 201–32; 68 (1984) 3–49.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine. “Les ‘Questiones supra librum Ethicorum’ de Pierre d’Auvergne,” Revue du Moyen Age Latin 20 (1964) 233–60.Google Scholar
Gauvard, Claude, Libera, Alain, and Zink, Michel (eds.). Dictionnaire du Moyen Age (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2002).Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 69 (1960) 221–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, Deno J.Theodore Gaza, a Byzantine Scholar of the Palaeologan ‘Renaissance’ in the Italian Renaissance,” in Constantinople and the West (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989) 68–90.Google Scholar
Geiger, Louis-Bertrand. La participation dans la philosophie de S. Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin, 1942; 2nd edn 1953).Google Scholar
Gelber, Hester Goodenough. “Eternal Questions: The Dominican Hugh of Lawton on the Eternity of the World,” in Asztalos, M. et al. (eds.) Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990) III: 71–8.Google Scholar
Gelber, Hester Goodenough. “I Cannot Tell a Lie: Hugh of Lawton’s Critique of William of Ockham on Mental Language,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984) 141–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelber, Hester Goodenough. It Could Have Been Otherwise: Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology at Oxford 1300–1350 (Leiden: Brill, 2004).Google Scholar
Gelber, Hester Goodenough. “Ockham’s Early Influence: A Question about Predestination and Foreknowledge by Arnold of Strelley, O.P.,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 55 (1988) 271–89.Google Scholar
Gendreau, Bernard. “The Quest for Certainty in Bonaventure,” Franciscan Studies 21 (1961) 104–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genest, Jean-François. “Aux origines d’une casuistique. La révélation des futurs contingents d’après la lecture de Richard Fitzralph sur les Sentences,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 69 (2002) 239–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genest, Jean-François. “Contingence et révélation des futurs: la quaestio biblica de Richard FitzRalph,” in Jolivet, J. et al. (eds.) Lectionum varietates: hommage à Paul Vignaux (Paris: Vrin, 1991) 199–246.Google Scholar
Genest, Jean-François. “Pierre de Ceffons et l’hypothèse du Dieu trompeur,” in Kaluza, Z. and Vignaux, P. (eds.) Preuve et raisons à l’Université de Paris: logique, ontologie et théologie au XIVe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1984) 197–214.Google Scholar
Genest, Jean-François. Prédétermination et liberté crée à Oxford au XIVe siècle: Buckingham contra Bradwardine (Paris: Vrin, 1992).Google Scholar
Genest, Jean-François and Tachau, Katherine. “La lecture de Thomas Bradwardine sur les Sentences,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 57 (1990) 301–6.Google Scholar
Gensler, Marek. “Catalogue of Works by or Ascribed to Antonius Andreae,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 31 (1992) 149–50.Google Scholar
Gensler, Marek. “The Concept of the Individual in the Sentences Commentary of Antonius Andreae,” in Aertsen, J. and Speer, A. (eds.) Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996) 305–12.Google Scholar
George, Robert (ed.). Natural Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
Georr, Khalil. Les Catégories d’Aristote dans leurs versions syro-arabes (Beirut: Institut français de Damas, 1948).Google Scholar
Germann, Nadja. De temporum ratione: Quadrivium und Gotteserkenntnis am Beispiel Abbos von Fleury und Hermanns von Reichenau (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Germann, Nadja. “Zwischen veritas naturae und fides historiae. Zeit und Dauer bei Abbo von Fleury,” in Speer, A. (ed.) Das Sein der Dauer (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 34) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008) 171–95.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gerwing, Manfred. Vom Ende der Zeit: der Traktat des Arnald von Villanova über die Ankunft des Antichrist in der akademischen Auseinandersetzung zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts (Münster: Aschendorff, 1996).Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan. Marsilius of Padua and Medieval Political Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan. “Republicanism and Absolutism in the Thought of Marsilius of Padua,” Medioevo 5 (1979) 23–48.Google Scholar
Geyer, Bernhard. Die Albert dem Grossen zugeschriebene Summa naturalium (Philosophia pauperum): Texte und Untersuchungen (Münster: Aschendorff, 1938).Google Scholar
Ghersetti, Antonella. Il Kitāb ArisṭāṭalĪs al-faylasūf nella traduzione di Ḥunayn b. Isḥāq (Freiburg: Herder, 1999).Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, Alberto M. (ed.). Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1960–).Google Scholar
Ghosh, Kantik. The Wycliffite Heresy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianazza, Egidio and D’Ilario, Giorgio. La vita e le opere di Giovanni da Legnano (sec. XIV) (Legnano: Landoni, 1983).Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R. et al. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn (Leiden: Brill, 1960–2004).Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret. “The Collected Works on Priscian: The Printed Editions 1470–1859,” Studi Medievali 18 (1979) 249–60.Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret. “The Early Scholastic Glosule to Priscian, Institutiones Grammaticae: The Text and its Influence,” Studi Medievali 1 (1979) 35–54.Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret. Lanfranc of Bec (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Gieben, Servus. “Bibliographia Oliviana (1885–1967),” Collectanea Franciscana 38 (1968) 167–95.Google Scholar
Gieben, Servus. “Bibliographia Universa Roberti Grosseteste ab an. 1473 ad an. 1969,” Collectanea Franciscana 39 (1969) 362–418.Google Scholar
Gieben, Servus. “Four Chapters on Philosophical Errors fromthe Rudimentum Doctrinae of Gilbert of Tournai,” Vivarium 1 (1963) 141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieben, Servus. “Robertus Grosseteste: Bibliographia 1970–91,” in McEvoy, J. (ed.) Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives on his Thought and Scholarship (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995).Google Scholar
Giet, Stanislas. “La doctrine de l’appropriation des biens chez quelques-uns des pères,” Recherches de science religieuse 35 (1948) 55–91.Google Scholar
Giffen, Lois. Theory of Profane Love among the Arabs (New York: New York University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neal. “Ockham, Wyclif, and the ‘Via Moderna’,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9 (1974) 85–125.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Richard. “Robert Holcot’s Quodlibeta,” Traditio 27 (1971) 480–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Vincent. “Doctrina and Predicacio: The Design and Function of Some Pastoral Manuals,” Leeds Studies in English (1980) 36–50.Google Scholar
Gillet, Martin Stanislas. Beatus Innocentius PP. V (Petrus de Tarantasia O.P.): Studia et documenta (Rome: Ad S. Sabinae, 1953).Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles C. (ed.). Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York: Scribner, 1970–80).Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. “Avicenne en occident au moyen-âge,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 36 (1969) 89–121.Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. Dante and Philosophy, ed. Moore, D. (London: Vrin, 1949).Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages (New York: Random House, 1955).Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. The Mystical Theology of St. Bernard, ed. Downes, A. H. C. (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1940; repr. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1990).Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. “La notion d’existence chez Guillaume d’Auvergne,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 15 (1946) 55–91.Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. The Philosophy of St. Bonaventure, tr. Trethowan, I. and Sheed, F. (Paterson, NJ: St. Anthony Guild, 1965).Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. “Pourquoi saint Thomas a critiqué saint Augustin,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 1 (1926–7) 5–127.Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. “Roger Marston, un cas d’augustinisme avicennisant,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 8 (1933) 37–42.Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. “Les sources gréco-arabes de l’augustinisme avicennisant,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 4 (1929–30) 5–149.Google Scholar
Gilson, étienne. Le thomisme: introduction au système de Saint Thomas d’Aquin (Strasbourg: Vix, 1919; 6th edn Paris: Vrin, 1983).Google Scholar
Gil-Sotres, Pedro. “Modelo teórico y observación clínica: las pasiones del alma en la psicología medica medieval,” in Comprendre et maîtriser la nature au Moyen Age: Mélanges d’histoire des sciences offerts à Guy Beaujouan (Geneva: Droz, 1994) 181–204.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. La doctrine d’al-AshʿarĪ (Paris: Cerf, 1990).Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. “Matériaux pour une bibliographie des ğubbāʿĪ,” Journal asiatique 264 (1976) 277–332.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. “Muʿtazila,” in Bearman, P. et al. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edn (Leiden: Brill Online, 1993) VII: 783–93.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. “La theórie des aḥwāl d’Abū Hāšim Al-ğubbāʿĪ,” Journal asiatique 258 (1970) 47–86.Google Scholar
Giocarinis, Kimon. “Eustratios of Nicaea’s Defence of the Doctrine of Ideas,” Franciscan Studies 24 (1964) 159–204.Google Scholar
Girolimon, Michael T.Hugh of St Victor’s De sacramentis Christianae fidei,” Journal of Religious History 18 (1994) 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, Ruth. “Levi ben Gershom and the Study of Ibn Rushd in the Fourteenth Century,” Jewish Quarterly Review 86 (1995) 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauche, Günter. Schullektüre im Mittelalter: Entstehung und Wandlungen des Lektürekanons bis 1200 nach den Quellen dargestellt (Munich: Arbeo-Gesellschaft, 1970).Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. “Le De gradibus formarum de Guillaume de Falgar, OFM,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 24 (1957) 296–319.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. “Jean Quidort et la distinction réelle de l’essence et de l’existence,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 18 (1951) 151–7.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. La littérature quodlibétique de 1260 à 1320 (Paris: Vrin, 1925–35).Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. “Maîtres franciscains de Paris: Fr. Eustache,” La France Franciscaine 13 (1930) 125–71.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. “Peut-on identifier P. de Ang.?,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 27 (1960) 148–53.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1933).Google Scholar
Gnädinger, Louise. Johannes Tauler, Lebenswelt und mystische Lehre (Munich: Beck, 1993).Google Scholar
Godart, G. C.‘Philosophy’ or ‘Religion’? The Confrontation with Foreign Categories in Late Nineteenth-Century Japan,” Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2008) 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddu, André. The Physics of William of Ockham (Leiden: Brill, 1984).Google Scholar
Goering, Joseph. “The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession,” Traditio 59 (2004) 175–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, Joseph. “Robert Grosseteste at the Papal Curia,” in Brown, J. and Stoneman, W. (eds.) A Distinct Voice: Medieval Studies in Honor of Leonard E. Boyle O.P. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997) 253–76.Google Scholar
Goering, Joseph. William de Montibus (c. 1140–1213): The Schools and the Literature of Pastoral Care (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1992).Google Scholar
Goitein, Shlomo Dov. “Abraham Maimonides and his Pietist Circle,” in Altmann, A. (ed.) Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967) 145–64.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R.Astronomy and Astrology in the Works of Abraham ibn Ezra,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6 (1996) 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Caffarena, José. Ser participado y ser subsistente e la metafísica de Enrique de Gante (Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1958).Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso. “Arisotle’s First Philosophy and the Principles of Particular Disciplines,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 32 (1978) 183–94.Google Scholar
Gondras, Alexandre Jean. “Un commentaire avignonnais sur le Liber de sex principiis attribué à ‘Maître Vital’,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 42 (1975) 196–317.Google Scholar
Gondras, Alexandre Jean. “Guillaume de Falegar. œuvre inédites,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 39 (1972) 185–288.Google Scholar
Gonsette, J.Pierre Damien et la culture profane (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1956).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Avicenna (London: Routledge, 1992; rev. edn Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Bahya on the Antinomy of Free Will and Predestination,” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983) 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.God of Abraham (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Islamic Humanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E. (ed.). Neoplatonism and Jewish Thought (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Rambam: Readings in the Philosophy of Moses Maimonides (New York: Viking, 1976).Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.RāzĪ vs RāazĪ: Philosophy in the Majlis,” in Lazarus-Yafeh, H. et al. (eds.) The Majlis: Interreligious Encounters in Medieval Islam (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1999) 84–107.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Razi’s Myth of the Fall of the Soul: Its Function in his Philosophy,” in Hourani, G. (ed.) Essays in Islamic Philosophy and Science (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1975) 25–40.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Razi’s Psychology,” Philosophical Forum 4 (1972) 26–48.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E.Saadiah Gaon’s Interpretive Technique in Translating the Book of Job,” in Translating Scripture (Jewish Quarterly Review supplement) (Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Research Institute, 1990) 47–76.Google Scholar
Goris, Harm.Free Creatures of an Eternal God. Thomas Aquinas on God’s Infallible Foreknowledge and Irresistible Will (Leuven: Peeters, 1996).Google Scholar
Goris, Wouter. “La critique de Richard de Conington par Robert de Walsingham,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 67 (2000) 269–93.Google Scholar
Goris, Wouter. Einheit als Prinzip und Ziel: Versuch über die Einheitsmetaphysik des Opus tripartitum Meister Eckharts (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Goris, Wouter. “Implicit Knowledge – Being as First Known in Peter of Oriel,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 69 (2002) 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goris, Wouter. “Die Kritik des Bernhard von Trilia an der Lehre von Gott als Ersterkanntem: Einleitung und Textausgabe,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 248–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goris, Wouter and Pickavé, Martin. “Die ‘Lectura Thomasina’ des Guilelmus Petri de Godino (ca. 1260–1336),” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Roma, magistra mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offerts au Père L.E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossiaux, Mark D.James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 74 (2007) 483–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossiaux, Mark D.James of Viterbo on the Relationship between Essence and Existence,” Augustiniana 49 (1999) 73–107.Google Scholar
Gössmann, Elisabeth. “Hildegard of Bingen,” in Waithe, M. E. (ed.) A History of Women Philosophers, vol. II (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989) 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gössmann, Elisabeth. Metaphysik und Heilsgeschichte: eine theologische Untersuchung der Summa Halesiana (Munich: Hueber, 1964).Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques (Paris: éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1999–).Google Scholar
Gouron, André. “Sur les sources civilistes et la datation des Sommes de Rufin e d’étienne de Tournai,” Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law, n.s. 16 (1986) 55–70.Google Scholar
Goy, Rudolf. Die überlieferung der Werke Hugos von St Viktor (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1976).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Die Aristoteleskommentare des Simon von Faversham: handschriftliche Mitteilungen (Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1933).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Die Aristoteleskommentatoren Adam von Bocfeld und Adam von Bouchermefort: die Anfänge der Erklärung des ‘neuen Aristotel’ in England,” Mittelalterliches Geistesleben (1936) 138–82, 613–16.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Gentile da Cingoli, ein italienischer Aristoteleserklärer aus der Zeit Dantes (Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1941).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Guglielmo di Moerbeke O.P. il traduttore delle opere di Aristotele (Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1946).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Des heiligen Augustinus Quaestio De ideis (De diversis quaestionibus LXXXIII, qu. 46) in ihrer inhaltlichen Bedeutung und mittelalterlichen Weiterwirkung,” in Grabmann, M. (ed.) Mittelalterliches Geistesleben (Munich: Hueber, 1936) II: 25–34.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Jakob von Douai, ein Aristoteleskommentator zur Zeit des hl. Thomas von Aquin und des Siger von Brabant,” in Pelzer, M. A. (ed.) Mélanges Auguste Pelzer: études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale de la scolastique médiévale offerts à Mgr. Auguste Pelzer à l’occasion de son soixantedixième anniversaire (Leuven: éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1947) 389–413.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Johannes Capreolus O.P., der Princeps Thomistarum (†1444), und seine Stellung in der Geschichte der Thomistenschule,” in Mittelalterliches Geistesleben: Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik (Munich: Hueber, 1956) III: 370–410.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Kardinal Guilelmus Petri O.P. († 1336) und seine Lectura Thomasina,” Divus Thomas 4 (1926) 385–402.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Der Liber de exemplis naturalibus des Franziskanertheologen Servasanctus,” Franziskanische Studien 7 (1920) 85–117.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Die logischen Schriften des Nikolaus von Paris und ihre Stellung in den aristotelischen Bewegung des XIII. Jahrhunderts,” in Grabmann, M. (ed.) Mittelalterliches Geistesleben (Munich: Hueber, 1926) I: 222–48.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Die Metaphysik des Thomas von York,” Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie: Festgabe zum 60 Geburtstag Clemens Baeumker (Münster: Aschendorff, 1913) 181–93.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Die Philosophia pauperum und ihr Verfasser Albert von Orlamünde,” Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 20 (1918) 1–29.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Die philosophische und theologische Erkenntnislehre des Kardinals Matthaeus von Aquasparta (Vienna: Mayer, 1906).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Quaestiones tres Fratris Ferrarii Catalani, O.Pr. doctrinam sancti Augustini illustrantes ex codice Parisiensi editae,” Estudis Franciscans 42 (1930) 382–90.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Die Sophismataliteratur des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts mit Textausgabe eines Sophisma des Boethius von Dacien (Münster: Aschendorff, 1940).Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Studien über den Averroisten Taddeo da Parma,” Mittelalterliches Geistesleben, vol. II (1936) 239–260.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Studien über Ulrich von Strassburg,” in Mittelalterliches Geistesleben: Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik (Munich: Hueber, 1926) I: 147–221.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. “Studien zu Johannes Quidort von Paris, O.Pr.,” in Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München (Munich: Die Akademie, 1922) [repr. in M. Grabmann, Gesammelte Akademieabhandlungen (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1979) I: 69–128].Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Thomas von Erfurt und die Sprachlogik des mittelalterlichen Aristotelismus (Munich: Hueber, 1943).Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E.The Agent and Possible Intellects in Gonsalvus Hispanus’ Question XIII,” Franciscan Studies 20 (1969) 5–36.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. and Noone, Timothy B. (eds.). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Graetz, Heinrich. “The Significance of Judaism for the Present and the Future,” Jewish Quarterly Review 1 (1888) 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, Georg. Geschichte der christlichen arabischen Literatur (Vatican: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1944–).Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages: Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. God and Reason in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. “Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme on Natural Knowledge,” Vivarium 31 (1993) 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Medieval Doctrine of Place: Some Fundamental Problems and Solutions,” in Maierù, A. and Paravicini-Bagliani, A. (eds.) Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1981) 57–79.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. Studies in Medieval Science and Natural Philosophy (London: Variorum Reprints, 1981).Google Scholar
Grass, Rainer. Schluβfolgerungslehre in Erfurter Schulen des 14. Jahrhunderts: eine Untersuchung der Konsequentientraktate von Thomas Maulfelt und Albert von Sachsen in Gegenüberstellung mit einer modernen Position (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, Onorato. Intuizione e significato: Adam Wodeham e il problema della conoscenza nel XIV secolo (Milan: Jaca, 1986).Google Scholar
Grassi, Onorato. “Le tesi di Robert Holcot sul valore non scientifico della conoscenza teologica,” Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 71 (1979) 49–79.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Niels. “Bradwardine (?) on Ockham’s Doctrine of Consequences: An Edition,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 42 (1982) 85–150.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Niels. “Early British Treatises on Consequences,” in Lewry, P. O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1985) 285–307.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Niels. “William of Champeaux on Boethius’ Topics according to Orléans Bibl. Mun. 266,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 13 (1974) 13–30.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. Anima mundi: la filosofia di Guglielmo di Conches e la Scuola di Chartres (Florence: Sansoni, 1955).Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. “Platone e Aristotele nello Speculum di Enrico Bate di Malines,” Studi Medievali 3 (1961) 302–19.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. “The Platonic Inheritance,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greive, Hermann. Studien zum jüdischen Neuplatonismus: die Religionsphilosophie des Abraham Ibn Ezra (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grellard, Christophe. Croire et savoir: les principes de la connaissance selon Nicolas d’Autrécourt (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “Al-GhazālĪ’s Concept of Prophecy: The Introduction of Avicennan Psychology into Ashʿarite Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004) 101–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. Al-GhazālĪ’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. Apostasie und Toleranz im Islam: die Entwicklung zu al-GazālĪs Urteil gegen die Philosophen und die Reaktionen der Philosophen (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “MS London, British Library Or. 3126: An Unknown Work by al-GhazālĪ on Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology,” Journal of Islamic Studies 17 (2006) 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H.The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H.Theodore Abu Qurrah: The Intellectual Profile of an Arab-Christian Writer of the First Abbasid Century (Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 1992).Google Scholar
Grignaschi, Marc. “Il pensiero politico e religioso di Giovanni di Jandun,” Bollettino del’Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medioevo e Archivio Muratoriano 70 (1958) 425–96.Google Scholar
Grignaschi, Marc. “Les traductions latines des ouvrages de la logique arabe et l’abrégé d’Alfarabi,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 39 (1972) 41–107.Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne. Le Graecismus d’Evrard de Béthune à travers ses gloses: entre grammaire positive et grammaire spéculative du XIIIe au XIVe siècle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grondeux, Anne. “Prologue, prohemium, glose du prohemium dans les manuscrits du Graecismus d’Evrard de Béthune,” in Les prologues médiévaux (Actes du colloque organisé par l’Academia Belgica et l’Ecole française de Rome, Rome 26–28 mars 1998) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000) 323–44.Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne. “Sophismata Anonymi Avenionensis,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 73 (2002) 41–59.Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne. “Turba ruunt (Ov. ‘Her.’ 1, 88?): Histoire d’un exemple grammatical,” Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 61 (2003) 175–222.Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne and Marguin, Elsa. “L’œuvre grammaticale de Jean de Garlande (ca. 1195–1272?), auteur, réviseur et glosateur. Un bilan,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 21 (1999) 133–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groppo, Guiseppe. “La teologia e il suo ‘subiectum’ secundo il prologo del commento alle sentenze di Pietro de Palude, O.P. († 1342),” Salesianum 23 (1961) 219–316.Google Scholar
Gross, Julius. “Die Erbsündenlehre Manegolds von Lautenbach nach seinem Psalmen-Kommentar,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 71 (1960) 253–61.Google Scholar
Gross-Diaz, Theresa. The Psalms Commentary of Gilbert of Poitiers: From lectio divina to the Lecture Room (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Gründel, Johannes. Die Lehre des Radulfus Ardens von den Berstandestugenden auf dem Hintergund seinen Seelenlehre (Munich: Schöningh, 1976).Google Scholar
Gründel, Johannes. “L’œuvre encyclopédique de Raoul Ardent, le Speculum universale,” Cahiers d’histoire mondiale 9 (1966) 553–70.Google Scholar
Gründel, Johannes. “Die Sentenzenglose des Johannes Pagus (circa 1243–1245) in Padua, Bibl. Ant. 139,” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 9 (1958) 171–85.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Herbert. “Die Frauen und die Literatur im Mittelalter: ein Beitrag zur Frage nach der Entstehung des Schrifttums in der Volkssprache,” Archiv fur Kulturgeschichte 26 (1936) 129–61.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Herbert. Religious Movements in the Middle Ages: The Historical Links between Heresy, the Mendicant Orders, and the Women’s Religious Movement in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Century, with the Historical Foundations of German Mysticism (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. Descartes’ Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons, tr. Ariew, R. et al. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984–5).Google Scholar
Guldentops, Guy. “Henry Bate’s Encyclopaedism,” in Binkley, P. (ed.) Pre-Modern Encyclopaedic Texts (Leiden: Brill, 1997) 227–37.Google Scholar
Guldentops, Guy. “Henry Bate’s Metamorphosis of Averroës,” Alif 16 (1996) 56–76.Google Scholar
Guldentops, Guy. “James of Douai’s Theory of Knowledge,” in Pacheco, M. C. and Meirinhos, J. F. (eds.) Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006) II: 1143–54.Google Scholar
Guldentops, Guy. “A Short Introduction to James of Douai’s Philosophy of Mind,” in Bakker, P. J. J. M. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (eds.) Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007) 21–43.Google Scholar
Guldentops, Guy and Steel, Carlos (eds.). Henry of Ghent and the Transformation of Scholastic Thought: Studies in Memory of Jos Decorte (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “The ‘Alexandria to Baghdad’ Complex of Narratives. A Contribution to the Study of Philosophical and Medical Historiography among the Arabs,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 10 (1999) 155–93.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works (Leiden: Brill, 1988).Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Geometry and the Rebirth of Philosophy in Arabic with al-KindĪ,” in Arnzen, R. and Thielmann, J. (eds.) Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea, Festschrift for Gerhard Endress (Leuven: Peeters, 2004) 195–209.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʿAbbāsid Society (2nd–4th / 8th–10th Centuries) (London: Routledge, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Intuition and Thinking: The Evolving Structure of Avicenna’s Epistemology,” in Wisnovsky, R. (ed.) Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001) 1–38.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “The Logic of Theology (kalām) in Avicenna,” in Perler, D. and Rudolph, U. (eds.) Logik und Theologie: das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter (Leiden: Brill, 2005) 59–72.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Paul the Persian on the Classification of the Parts of Aristotle’s Philosophy: A Milestone between Alexandria and Baġdād,” Der Islam 60 (1983) 231–67.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Plato’s Symposion in the Arabic Tradition,” Oriens 31 (1988) 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, Klaus. Johannes von Salisbury (1115/20–1180): Studien zur Kirchen-, Kultur- und Sozialgeschichte Westeuropas im 12. Jh. (St. Ottilien: Eos-Verlag, 1978).Google Scholar
Gutierrez, David. “De vita et scriptis Beati Iacobi de Viterbio,” Analecta Augustiniana 16 (1937–8) 216–24, 282–305, 358–81.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Galindo, Marco. El Doctrinal: una gramática latina del Renacimiento del siglo XII (Madrid: Akal, 1993).Google Scholar
Gwynn, Aubrey. “The ‘Sermon-Diary’ of Richard FitzRalph, Archbishop of Armagh,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 44 (1937–8) 1–57.Google Scholar
Gyekye, Kwame. “Al-Ghazâlî on Action,” in Ghazâlî, la raison et le miracle (Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose, 1987) 83–91.Google Scholar
Haage, Bernhard Dietrich. “Die Korpuskulartheorie bei Geber latinus,” Würzburger medizinhistorische Mitteilungen 12 (1994) 19–28.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. “The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights,” in Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (eds.) Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002) 13–26.Google Scholar
Haas, Alois M.Nim din selbes war: Studien zur Lehre von der Selbsterkenntnis bei Meister Eckhart, Johannes Tauler und Heinrich Seuse (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1971).Google Scholar
Hackett, Jeremiah (ed.). Roger Bacon and Aristotelianism, special issue of Vivarium 35:2 (1997).Google Scholar
Hackett, Jeremiah (ed.). Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Hackett, Jeremiah and Mahoney, Thomas S.. “Roger Bacon Bibliography (1957–1985),” New Scholasticism 61 (1987) 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut. Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1984).Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut. “Dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fondé son école de mathématiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen?,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1 (2007) 42–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. “La distinction de l’être et de l’étant dans le ‘De Hebdomadibus’ de Boèce,” in Die Metaphysik im Mittelalter (Miscellanea mediaevalia 2) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1963) 147–53.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. Exercises spirituels et philosophie antique, 2nd edn (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1987).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. “Forma essendi: interprétation philologique et interprétation philosophique d’une formule de Boèce,” études Classiques 38 (1970) 143–56.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exegesis from Socrates to Foucault, tr. Chase, M. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar
Haines, Roy. “Ecclesia Anglicana”: Studies in the English Church of the Later Middle Ages (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Haldane, John. “The Metaphysics of Intellect(ion),” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80 (2007) 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldon, John. Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallamaa, Olli. “Defending Common Rationality: Roger Roseth on Trinitarian Paralogisms,” Vivarium 41 (2003) 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallamaa, Olli. “On the Borderline between Logic and Theology: Roger Roseth, Sophismata, and Augmentation of Charity,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11 (2000) 351–74.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B.The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Halm, Heinz. Shiism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1991; 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Halverson, James L.Peter Aureol on Predestination. A Challenge to Late Medieval Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar
Hamann, Florian. Das Siegel der Ewigkeit: Universalwissenschaft und Konziliarismus bei Heymericus de Campo (Münster: Aschendorff, 2006).Google Scholar
Hames, Harvey. The Art of Conversion: Christianity and Kabbalah in the Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Hammond, Robert. The Philosophy of Alfarabi and its Influence on Medieval Thought (New York: Hobson Book Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne. “Aquinas and the Platonists,” in Gersh, S. and Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages. A Doxographic Approach (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002) 279–324.Google Scholar
Häring, N. M.Chartres and Paris Revisited,” in O’Donnell, J. R. (ed.) Essays in Honour of Anton Charles Pegis (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1974) 268–329.Google Scholar
Häring, N. M.The Creation and Creator of the World According to Thierry of Chartres and Clarenbaldus of Arras,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 22 (1955) 137–216.Google Scholar
Häring, N. M.Everard of Ypres and his Appraisal of the Conflict between St. Bernard and Gilbert of Poitiers,” Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955) 143–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häring, N. M.In Search of Adhemar’s Patristic Collection,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 336–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häring, N. M.The Liber de differentia naturae et personae by Hugh Etherian and the Letters Addressed to him by Peter of Vienna and Hugh of Honau,” Mediaeval Studies 24 (1962) 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häring, N. M.Simon of Tournai and Gilbert of Poitiers,” Mediaeval Studies 27 (1965) 325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häring, N. M.Die Vatersammlung des Adhemar von Saint-Ruf in Valence,” Scholastik 38 (1963) 402–20.Google Scholar
Harris, Jay (ed.). Maimonides after 800 Years: Essays on Maimonides and his Influence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. “Do We Have a Will? Augustine’s Way in to the Will,” in Matthews, G.B. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999) 195–205.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.Are There Any Natural Rights?,” Philosophical Review 64 (1955) 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Friedrich. Die Literatur von Früh- und Hochsalerno und der Inhalt des Breslauer Codex Salernitanus (Leipzig: Noske, 1919).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Wilfried. “Manegold von Lautenbach und die Anfänge der Frühscholastik,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 26 (1970) 47–149.Google Scholar
Harvey, E. Ruth. The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (London: Warburg Institute, 1975).Google Scholar
Harvey, Steven (ed.) The Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedias of Science and Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, StevenThe Place of the Philosopher in the City according to Ibn Bajja,” in Butterworth, C. E. (ed.) The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy: Essays in Honor of M. S. Mahdi (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992) 199–233.Google Scholar
Harvey, Warren. “Albo’s Discussion of Time,” Jewish Quarterly Review 70 (1979–80) 210–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Warren. Physics and Metaphysics in Hasdai Crescas (Amsterdam: Gieben, 1998).Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. “Avicenna on Abstraction,” in Wisnovsky, R. (ed.) Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 2001) 39–72.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West: The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul 1160–1300 (London: Warburg Institute; Turin: Nino Aragno Editore, 2000).Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. “Pietro d’Abano’s ‘Conciliator’ and the Theory of the Soul in Paris,” in Aertsen, Jan A. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 635–53.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. “Plato Arabico-latinus: Philosophy – Wisdom Literature – Occult Sciences,” in Gersh, S. and Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002) 31–65.Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf. “Johannes Wenck aus Herrenberg als Albertist,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 18 (1951) 308–23.Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf. Streifzüge in die cusanische Theologie (Münster: Aschendorff, 1991).Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf et al. (eds). Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft (Mainz: Mattias-Grünewald, 1961–).Google Scholar
Hauke, Hermann. “Die Lehre von der Beseligenden Schau nach Nikolaus Trivet” (Inaugural Dissertation: University of Munich, 1967).Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2007) 1–20.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997) 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, Mark. La vie et les oeuvres de Maître Arnaud de Villeneuve (1896; reprint, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1972).Google Scholar
Hawi, Sami. “Ibn Tufayl’s Appraisal of his Predecessors and their Influence on his Thought,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 7 (1976) 89–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawi, Sami. Islamic Naturalism and Mysticism: A Philosophical Study of Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Yaqzan (Leiden: Brill, 1974).Google Scholar
Hayes, Zachary. The General Doctrine of Creation in the Thirteenth Century, with Special Emphasis on Matthew of Aquasparta (Munich: Schöningh, 1964).Google Scholar
Hayoun, Moise-Ruben. Moshe Narboni (Tubingen: Mohr, 1986).Google Scholar
Hayoun, Moise-Ruben and Libera, Alain (eds.). Averroès et l’averroïsme (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1991).Google Scholar
Heemskerk, Margaretha. Suffering in the Muʿtazilite Theology: ʿAbd al-Jabbar’s Teaching on Pain and Divine Justice (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Hegyi, Johannes. Die Bedeutung des Seins bei den klassischen Kommentatoren des heiligen Thomas von Aquin: Capreolus, Silvester von Ferrara, Cajetan (Pullach bei München: Berchmanskolleg, 1959).Google Scholar
Heidingsfelder, Georg. Albert von Sachsen: sein Lebensgang und sein Kommentar zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles (Münster: Aschendorff, 1927).Google Scholar
Hein, Christel. Definition und Einteilung der Philosophie von der spätantiken Einleitungsliteratur zur arabischen Enzyklopädie (Frankfurt: Lang, 1985).Google Scholar
Heintke, Fritz. Humbert von Romans, der fünfte Ordermeister der Dominikaner (Berlin: Ebering, 1933; repr. Vaduz: Kraus, 1965).Google Scholar
Heinzmann, Richard. Die Compilatio questionum theologiae secundum Magistrum Martinum (Munich: Hueber, 1964).Google Scholar
Henderson, John. The Medieval World of Isidore of Seville: Truth from Words (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Henle, Robert J.Saint Thomas and Platonism: A Study of Plato and Platonici Texts in the Writings of Saint Thomas (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henninger, Mark. “Hervaeus Natalis, b.1250/60; d. 1323, and Richard of Mediavilla, b.1245/49; d.1302/07,” in Gracia, J. J. E. (ed.) Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150–1650 (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994) 299–318.Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark. “Thomas Wylton’s Theory of Relations,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 1 (1990) 457–90.Google Scholar
Henquinet, F.Les manuscrits et l’influence des écrits theologiques d’Eudes Rigaud,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 11 (1939) 323–50.Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond P.The Logic of Saint Anselm (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond P.The Singular Syllogism of Garlandus Compotista,” Revue internationale de philosophie 113 (1975) 243–70.Google Scholar
Herren, Michael. “Manegold of Lautenbach’s Scholia on the Metamorphoses – Are There More?” Notes and Queries 51 (2004) 218–23.Google Scholar
Herscher, Irenaeus. “A Bibliography of Alexander of Hales,” Franciscan Studies 5 (1945) 434–54.Google Scholar
Heynck, Valens. “Der Skotist Hugo de Novo Castro,” Franziskanische Studien 43 (1961) 244–70.Google Scholar
Heynck, Valens. “Studien zu Johannes von Erfurt,” Franziskanische Studien 40 (1958) 327–60; 42 (1960) 153–96.Google Scholar
Heynck, Valens. “Zur Datierung des ‘Correctorium fratris Thomae’ Wilhelmus de La Mare,” Franziskanische Studien 49 (1967) 1–21.Google Scholar
Heysse, Aubain. “Fr. Pierre de Falco ne peut être identifié avec Guillaume de Falegar O.F.M.,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 33 (1940) 241–67.Google Scholar
Hill, Donald R.The Literature of Arabic Alchemy,” in Young, M. J. L. et al. (eds.) Religion, Learning and Science in the Abbasid Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990) 328–41.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, Eugen. Nikolaus von Strassburg: religiöse Bewegung und dominikanische Theologie im 14. Jahrhundert (Freiburg im Breisgau: Albert, 1968).Google Scholar
Hillgarth, Jocelyn N.Ramon Lull and Lullism in Fourteenth-Century France (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Hilsch, Peter. Johannes Hus (um 1370–1415): Prediger Gottes und Ketzer (Rogensbourg: Pustet, 1999).Google Scholar
Hinnebusch, William. The Early English Friars Preachers (Rome: Ad S. Sabinae, 1951).Google Scholar
Hinnebusch, William. The History of the Dominican Order (State Island, NY: Alba House, 1966–73).Google Scholar
Hirschfield, Hartwig. Festschrift zum 80. Geburtstag Moritz Steinschneiders. (Leipzig: Harrassowitz, 1896)Google Scholar
Hirvonen, Vesa. Passions in William Ockham’s Philosophical Psychology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hissette, Roland. Enquête sur les 219 articles condamnés à Paris le 7 mars 1277 (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1977).Google Scholar
Hissette, Roland. “Une question quodlibétique de Servais du Mont-Saint-Eloi sur le pouvoir papal de l’évêque,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 49 (1982) 234–42.Google Scholar
Hissette, Roland. “Roger Marston, a-t-il professé l’hylemorphisme universel?,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 29 (1972) 205–23.Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. “La philosophie des Quodlibets de Pierre d’Auvergne,” in Long, A. et al. (eds.) Aus der Geisteswelt des Mittelalters: Studien und Texte Martin Grabmann zur Vollendung des 60. Lebensjahres von Freunden und Schülern gewidmet (Münster: Aschendorff, 1935).Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. “Les Quaestiones in metaphysicam de Pierre d’Auvergne,” Archives de philosophie 9 (1932) 515–70.Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. “Un question inédite de Pierre d’Auvergne sur l’individuation,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 36 (1934) 355–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. Richard de Middleton: sa vie, ses œuvres, sa doctrine (Leuven: Spicilegium Sacrum lovaniense, 1925).Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. “La théologie de Pierre d’Auvergne,” Gregorianum 11 (1930) 526–55.Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. “La vie et les œuvres de Pierre d’Auvergne,” Gregorianum 14 (1933) 3–36.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Die Aulien des Magisters Johannes von Pouilly und der scholastische Streit über die Begründung der menschlichen Willensfreiheit,” Scholastik 35 (1960) 57–75.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Literar- und problemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Sentenzenkommentar des Wilhelm von Ware O.F.M. (nach 1305),” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 57 (1990) 122–41.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “ ‘Non est malitia in voluntate …’; Die magistrale Entscheidung der Pariser Theologen von 1285/86 in der Diskussion des Johannes de Polliaco, Quodl. I, q. 10,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 66 (1999) 247–97.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Die Opposition des Johannes de Polliaco gegen die Schule der Gandavistae,” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch 9 (2004) 115–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “The Quodlibeta of John of Pouilly († ca. 1328) and the Philosophical and Theological Debates at Paris 1307–1312,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Die Seinsdifferenz des möglichen im Quodlibet des Jacobus von Ascoli Ordinis Minorum,” in Pluta, O. (ed.) Die Philosophie im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1988) 465–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Die Sentenzen des Petrus Lombardus in der Diskussion seiner Schule,” in Evans, G.R. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: Current Research (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 25–40.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig. “Studien zum nominalistischen Schöpfungsbegriff in der spätscholastischen Theologie des Michael de Massa OESA († 1337),” Cassiciacum 30 (1975) 234–56.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Academic Theology in the Fifteenth Century: The Sentences Commentary of Heymericus de Campo (+ 1460),” in Bakker, P. J. J. M. (ed.) Chemins de la penseé médiévale: études offertes à Zénon Kaluza (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) 513–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Academics and Intellectual Life in the Low Countries. The University Career of Heymeric de Campo († 1460),” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 61 (1994) 173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.The Commentary on the Sentences of Marsilius of Inghen,” in Evans, G. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 465–506.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Heymeric van de Velde: Eenheid in de tegendelen (Baarn: Ambo, 1990).Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Heymeric van de Velde († 1460) und die Geschichte des Albertismus: Auf der Suche nach den Quellen der albertistischen Intellektlehre des Tractatus problematicus,” in Hoenen, M. J. F. M. and Libera, A. (eds.) Albertus Magnus und der Albertismus: Deutsche philosophische Kultur des Mittelalters (Leiden: Brill, 1995) 303–31.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Marsilius of Inghen: Divine Knowledge in Late Medieval Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1993).Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Marsilius von Inghen: Bibliographie. Appendix zu der geplanten Edition der wichtigsten Werk des Marsilius von Inghen,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 31 (1989) 150–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Marsilius von Inghen: Bibliographie. Ergänzungen,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 31 (1990) 191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.Nominalismus als universitäre Spekulationskontrolle,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 73 (2006) 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M. and Bakker, Paul J. J. M. (eds.). Philosophie und Theologie des ausgehenden Mittelalters: Marsilius von Inghen und das Denken seiner Zeit (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M and Libera, Alain. Albertus Magnus und der Albertismus: Deutsche philosophische Kultur des Mittelalters (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Hoeres, Walter. “Wesen und Dasein bei Heinrich von Gent und Duns Scot,” Franziskanische Studien 47 (1965) 121–86.Google Scholar
Hoeres, Walter. “Zur Ontologie von Petrus Thomae OFM,” Franziskanische Studien 43 (1961) 374–9.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Fritz. Die theologische Methode des Oxforder Dominikanerlehrers Robert Holcot (Münster: Aschendorff, 1972).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Fritz. “Der Wandel in der Scholastischen Argumentation vom 13 Zum 14 Jahrhundert aufgezeigt an zwei Beispielen: Robert Holcot und William Crathorn,” in Speer, A. (ed.) Die Bibliotheca Amploniana: ihre Bedeutung im Spannungsfeld von Aristotelismus, Nominalismus und Humanismus (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995) 301–22.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2007) 122–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias (eds.). Das Problem der Willensschwäche in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie (Leuven: Peeters, 2006).Google Scholar
Höfler, Karl Adolf Constantin. Geschichtschreiber der husitischen bewegung in Böhmen (Vienna: Hofund Staatsdruckerei, 1856–66).Google Scholar
Hofmeier, Johann. Die Trinitätslehre des Hugo von St. Viktor (Munich: Hueber, 1964).Google Scholar
Holloway, Julia Bolton. Brunetto Latini: An Analytic Bibliography (London: Grant and Cutler, 1986).Google Scholar
Holloway, Julia Bolton. Twice-Told Tales: Brunetto Latino and Dante Alighieri (New York: Lang, 1993).Google Scholar
Hollywood, Amy. “Inside Out: Beatrice of Nazareth and her Hagiographer,” in Mooney, C. (ed.) Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999) 78–98.Google Scholar
Hollywood, Amy. The Soul as Virgin Wife: Mechtild of Magdeburg, Marguerite Porete, and Meister Eckhart (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Holopainen, Toivo. Dialectic and Theology in the Eleventh Century (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Holopainen, Toivo. “Necessity in Early Medieval Thought: Peter Damian and Anselm of Canterbury,” in Gilbert, P. et al. (eds.) Cur Deus Homo (Rome: Herder, 1999) 221–34.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. “La grammaire carolingienne,” in Auroux, S. (ed.) Histoire des idées linguistiques, tome II: Le développement de la grammaire occidentale (Liège: Mardaga, 1992) 96–106.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. and Weijers, Olga. L’enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des Arts (Paris et Oxford, XIIIe–XVe siècles) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997).Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger. Ens inquantum ens: der Begriff des Seienden als solchen als Gegenstand der Metaphysik nach der Lehre des Johannes Duns Scotus (Münster: Aschendorff, 1979).Google Scholar
Hoover, J.Ibn Taymiyya as an Avicennan Theologian: A Muslim Approach to God’s Self-Sufficiency,” Theological Review 27 (2006) 34–46.Google Scholar
Hoover, J.Perpetual Creativity in the Perfection of God: Ibn Taymiyya’s Hadith Commentary on God’s Creation of the World,” Journal of Islamic Studies 15 (2004) 287–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Jasper. A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jasper. A Concise Introduction to the Philosophy of Nicholas of Cusa, 3rd edn (Minneapolis, MN: Banning, 1986).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jasper. Nicholas of Cusa’s Debate with John Wenck (Minneapolis, MN: Banning, 1988).Google Scholar
Horst, Ulrich. Die Trinitäts und Gotteslehre des Robert von Melun (Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 1964).Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael A. and Molland, A.G.. “Swineshead on Falling Bodies: An Example of Fourteenth-Century Physics,” British Journal for the History of Science 3 (1966–7) 150–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoste, Anselm. Bibliotheca Aelrediana: A Survey of the Manuscripts, Old Catalogues, Editions and Studies Concerning St. Aelred of Rievaulx (Steenbrugis: In Abbatia Sancti Petri, 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, George. “Ibn Sina on Necessary and Possible Existence,” Philosophical Forum 4 (1972) 74–86.Google Scholar
Hourani, George. Islamic Rationalism: The Ethics of ʿAbd al-Jabbar (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Hourani, George. “The Principal Subject of Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 15 (1956) 40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, George. “Reason and Revelation in Ibn Hazm’s Ethical Thought,” in Hourani, G. (ed.) Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985) 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, George. Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, R. E.The Cardinal Virtues: Aquinas, Albert and Philip the Chancellor (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Houser, R. E.Philosophical Development through Metaphor: Light among the Greeks,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64 (1990) 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, R. E.The Real Distinction and the Principles of Metaphysics: Avicenna and Aquinas,” in Houser, R. E. (ed.) Laudemus viros gloriosos: Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, CSB (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007) 74–108.Google Scholar
Houwen, L. A. J. R. and MacDonald, A. A. (eds.). Alcuin of York: Scholar at the Carolingian Court (Groningen: Forsten, 1998).Google Scholar
Howard, Peter. Beyond the Written Word: Preaching and Theology in the Florence of Archbishop Antoninus 1427–1459 (Florence: Olschki, 1995).Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne. The Premature Reformation: Wycliffite Texts and Lollard History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne. (ed.) Selections from English Wycliffite Writings (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne and Wilks, Michael (eds.). From Ockham to Wyclif (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
Hudson, Nancy. Becoming God: The Doctrine of Theosis in Nicholas of Cusa (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hughes, Aaron. The Texture of the Divine: Imagination in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Thought (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Hughes, G. E.John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan’s “Sophismata”, An Edition and Translation with an Introduction and Philosophical Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Hughes, Kevin. “The Ratio Dei and the Ambiguities of History,” Modern Theology 21 (2005) 645–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. “Aux origines de l’exégèse orientale de la logique d’Aristote: Sergius de Rešʿaina († 536), médecin et philosophe,” Journal asiatique 277 (1989) 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. “Le corpus philosophique syriaque aux VIe – VIIe siècles,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque (Paris: Vrin, 2004).Google Scholar
Humbrecht, Thierry-Dominique. Théologie négative et noms divins chez saint Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Hunger, Herbert. “Philosophie,” in Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur den Byzantiner (Munich: Beck, 1978) I: 3–62.Google Scholar
Huning, H. A.Die Stellung der Petrus de Trabibus zur Philosophie: nach dem zweiten Prolog zum ersten Buch seines Sentenzenkommentars ms 154, Biblioteca Comunale, Assisi,” Franziskanische Studien 46 (1964) 193–287; 47 (1965) 1–43.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W.Absoluta: The Summa of Petrus Hispanus on Priscianus Minor,” Historiographia Linguistica 2 (1975) 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. W.The Schools and the Cloister: The Life and Writings of Alexander Nequam, ed. and rev. Gibson, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W.Studies on Priscian in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. I. Petrus Helias and his Predecessors,” Medieval and Renaissance Studies 1 (1941–3) 194–231; reprinted in G. L. Bursill-Hall (ed.) The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages. Collected Papers (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1980).Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W.Studies on Priscian in the Twelfth Century. II: The School of Ralph of Beauvais,” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 2 (1950) 1–56; reprinted in G. L. Bursill-Hall. (ed.) The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages. Collected Papers (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1980).Google Scholar
Hunt, Tony. Teaching and Learning Latin in Thirteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Brewer, 1991).Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. “Virtuous Act, Virtuous Dispositions,” Analysis 66 (2006) 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husik, Isaac. “Joseph Albo: The Last of the Mediaeval Jewish Philosophers,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 1 (1928–30) 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huygens, R. B. C.Bérenger de Tours, Lanfranc et Bernold de Constance,” Sacris erudiri 16 (1965) 358–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Arthur. “Aristotle’s ‘First Matter’ and Avicenna’s and Averroes’s ‘Corporeal Form’,” in Lieberman, S. et al. (eds.) Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume (Jerusalem: American Academy for Jewish Research, 1965) 385–406.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur. “Maimonides on Creation and Emanation,” in Wippel, J. F.. (ed.) Studies in Medieval Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1987) 45–61.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur and Walsh, James J. (eds.). Philosophy in the Middle Ages: The Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Traditions, 2nd edn (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1973).Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe. The Mystical Experience in Abraham Abulafia (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe and McGinn, Bernard (eds.). Mystical Union in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: An Ecumenical Dialogue (New York: Continuum, 1999).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “The Anti-Logical Movement in the Fourteenth Century,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002) 219–36.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “Byzantine Commentators on the Epistemic Status of Ethics,” in Adamson, P. et al. (eds.) Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Commentaries (London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004) 221–38.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. (ed.). Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “The Byzantine Reception of Aristotle’s Categories,” Synthesis Philosophica 39 (2005) 7–31.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “John Italos on Universals,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007) 231–47.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “Metaphysics in the Byzantine Tradition: Eustratios of Nicaea on Universals,” Quaestio 5 (2005) 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “Psellos’ Paraphrasis on Aristotle’s De interpretatione,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002) 157–81.Google Scholar
Ilkhani, Mohammad. La philosophie de la création chez Achard de Saint-Victor (Brussels: Ousia, 1999).Google Scholar
Illich, Ivan. In the Vineyard of the Text: A Commentary to Hugh’s Didascalicon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Imbach, Ruedi. “Averroistische Stellungnahmen zur Diskussion über das Verhältnis von Esse und Essentia. Von Siger von Brabant zu Thaddeus von Parma,” in Maierù, A. and Bagliani, A. Paravicini (eds.) Studi sul xiv secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1981) 299–339.Google Scholar
Imbach, Ruedi. “Das Centheologicon des Heymericus de Campo und die darin enthaltenen Casnus- Reminisizenzen,” Traditio 39 (1983) 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbach, Ruedi. Dante, la philosophie et les laïcs (Fribourg: éditions universitaires, 1996).Google Scholar
Imbach, Ruedi. “Notule sur le commentaire du ‘Liber de causis’ de Siger de Brabant et ses rapports avec Thomas d’Aquin,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 43 (1996) 304–23.Google Scholar
Ruedi, Imbach and Lindblad, Ulrika. “Compilatio rudis ac puerilis. Hinweise und Materialien zu Nikolaus von Strassburg O. P. und seiner Summa,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 32 (1985) 155–233.Google Scholar
Incandela, Joseph. “Robert Holcot, O.P., on Prophecy, the Contingency of Revelation, and the Freedom of God,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 4 (1994) 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Mary Beth and Dreyer, Mechthild. The Philosophical Vision of John Duns Scotus (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Inglis, John. “Aquinas’s Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues,” Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1999) 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, John. Spheres of Philosophical Inquiry and the Historiography of Medieval Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iogna-Prat, Dominique and Jeudy, Colette. L’école carolingienne d’Auxerre: de Murethach à Rémi, 830–908 (Paris: Beauchesne, 1991).Google Scholar
Iremadze, Tengiz. Konzeptionen des Denkens im Neuplatonismus: zur Rezeption der proklischen Philosophie im deutschen und georgischen Mittelalter: Dietrich von Freiberg, Berthold von Moosburg, Joane Petrizi (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2004).Google Scholar
Iribarren, Isabel. Durandus of St. Pourçain: A Dominican Theologian in the Shadow of Aquinas (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iribarren, Isabel. “‘Responsio secundum Thomam’ and the Search for an Early Thomistic School,” Vivarium 39 (2001) 255–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence. “Stoic Naturalism and its Critics,” in Inwood, B. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issawi, Charles. An Arab Philosophy of History: Selections from the Prolegomena of Ibn Khaldun of Tunis (1332–1406) (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Ivry, Alfred L.Al-Kindi’s Metaphysics (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Ivry, Alfred. “Averroes’ Three Commentaries on De Anima,” in Aertsen, J. A. and Endress, G. (eds.) Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition (Leiden: Brill, 1999) 199–216.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “Influence,” in Brower, J. and Guilfoy, K. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 305–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “Pierre Abélard et Guillaume de Champeaux dans les premières années du XIIe siècle: une étude préliminaire,” in Baird, J. (ed.) Langage, sciences, philosophie au XIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1999).Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “The Introductiones dialecticae secundum Wilgelmum and secundum magistrum G. Paganellum,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 63 (1993) 45–114.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “Vocales, or Early Nominalists,” Traditio 47 (1992) 37–111.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “William of Champeaux and the Introductiones,” in Braakhuis, H. and Kneepkens, C. H. (eds.) Aristotle’s Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages: Essays on the Commentary Tradition (Groningen: Ingenium, 2003) 1–30.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. “William of Champeaux on Aristotle’s Categories,” in Biard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.) La tradition médiévale des Catégories XIIe–XIVe siècles. Actes du XIIIe symposium européen de logique et de sémantique médiévales (Leuven: Peeters, 2003) 313–28.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio and Ebbesen, Sten. “Logico-Theological Schools from the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: A List of Sources,” Vivarium 30 (1992) 173–210.Google Scholar
Jabre, Farid. La notion de certitude selon Ghazali dans ses origines psychologiques et historiques (Paris: Vrin, 1958).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Klaus. “Einzelnes-Individuum-Person. Gilbert von Poitier’s Philosophie des Individuellen,” in Aertsen, J. and Speer, A. (eds.) Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Klaus. Gespräche lesen: philosophische Dialoge im Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1999).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Klaus. Die Methode der cusanischen Philosophie (Munich: Alber, 1969).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Klaus. Die Modalbegriffe in den logischen Schriften des Wilhelm von Shyreswood und in anderen Kompendien des 12. et 13. Jahrhunderts (Leiden: Brill, 1980).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Klaus. “Peter Abelard’s Investigations into the Meaning and Function of the Speech Sign ‘Est’,” in Knuutila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.) The Logic of Being (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986) 145–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Louis. Principles of the Jewish Faith: An Analytical Study (New York: Basic Books, 1964).Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “Aristotelian Thought in Salerno,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “De l’Arabe au Latin: l’influence de quelque choix lexicaux (impressio, ingenium, intuitio),” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Aux origines du lexique philosophique europeen (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1997) 167–80.Google Scholar
James, T. E.Peter Alboini of Mantua: Philosopher-Humanist,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1974) 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Bernhard. Die Erkenntnislehre Olivis (Berlin: Duemmlers, 1921).Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L.An Annotated Bibliography on Ibn Sînâ (1970–1989) including Arabic and Persian Publications and Turkish and Russian References (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L.An Annoted Bibliography on Ibn Sina: First Supplement (1990–1994) (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1999).Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L.Bahmanyār, and his Revision of Ibn SĪnā’s Metaphysical Project,” Medioevo 32 (2007) 99–117.Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L.Bahmanyār ibn al-Marzubān: A Faithful Disciple of Ibn SĪnā?” in Reisman, D. C. and al-RahĪm, A. H. (eds.) Before and After Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group (Leiden: Brill, 2003) 177–98.Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L.Ibn Sina and his Influence on the Arabic and Latin World (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Janssens, Jules L. and Smet, Daniel (eds.). Avicenna and his Heritage (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace. Julian of Norwich: Mystic and Theologian (London: Paulist Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. L’âge d’or des écoles de Chartres (Chartres: éditions Houvet, 1995).Google Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. “Le commentaire de Guillaume de Lucques sur les Noms Divins,” in Boiadjiev, T. et al. (eds.) Die Dionysius-Rezeption im Mittelalter (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000) 177–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. “Deux rédactions des gloses de Guillaume de Conches sur Priscien,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 27 (1960) 212–47.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. études érigéniennes (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1987).Google Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. “L’héritage de la philosophie antique durant le haut Moyen âge,” Settimane di studio del Centro Italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo 22 (1975) 17–54.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, édouard. Lectio philosophorum: recherches sur l’école de Chartres (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1973).Google Scholar
Jensen, Kurt Villads. “Robert Holkot’s Questio on Killing Infidels: A Reevaluation and an Edition,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 63 (1993) 207–28.Google Scholar
Joannou, Périclès-Pierre. Christliche Metaphysik in Byzanz: die Illuminationslehre des Michael Psellos und Johannes Italos (Ettal: Buch-Kunstverlag, 1956).Google Scholar
Joannou, Périclès-Pierre. “Die Definition des Seins bei Eustratios von Nikaia,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 47 (1954) 358–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joannou, Périclès-Pierre. “Der Nominalismus und die menschliche Psychologie Christ,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 47 (1954) 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War: Religious and Secular Concepts, 1200–1740 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War. A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark D.The Evangelical Rhetoric of Ramon Llull (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark D.The Spiritual Logic of Ramon Llull (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. Abélard, ou la philosophie dans le langage (Paris: Seghers, 1969).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. “The Arabic Inheritance,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 113–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. Godescalc d’Orbais et la trinité (Paris: Vrin, 1958).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. “L’intellect et le langage selon Radulphus Brito,” in Kaluza, Z. and Vignaux, P. (eds.) Preuve et raisons à l’Université de Paris: logique, ontologie et théologie au XIVe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1985) 83–91.Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. L’intellect selon Kindi (Leiden: Brill, 1971).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean. Philosophie médiévale arabe et latine (Paris: Vrin, 1995).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean and Libera, Alain (eds.). Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains: aux origines de la logica modernorum (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987).Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark D.Aquinas’s Construction of a Moral Account for the Passions,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 33 (1986) 71–97.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark D.The Controversy of the Correctoria and the Limits of Metaphysics,” Speculum 57 (1982) 292–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Mark D.The Disappearance of Galen in Thirteenth-Century Philosophy and Theology,” in Zimmermann, A. et al. (eds.) Mensch und Natur im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992) 703–17.Google Scholar
Jordan, William C.Unceasing Strife, Unending Fear: Jacques de Thérines and the Freedom of the Church in the Age of the Last Capetians (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jospe, Raphael. Torah and Sophia: The Life and Thought of Shem Tov ibn Falaquera (Cincinnati, OH: Hebrew Union College Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Joutsivuo, Timo. Scholastic Tradition and Humanist Innovation: The Concept of Neutrum in Renaissance Medicine (Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1999).Google Scholar
Jullien, Marie-Hélène and Perelman, Françoise. Clavis des auteurs latins du moyen age: territoire français, 735–987. Tomus II: Alcuin (Turnhout: Brepols, 1999).Google Scholar
Jung-Palczewska, Elzbieta. “The Concept of Time in Richard Kilvington,” in Cova, L. and Alliney, G. (eds.) Tempus aevum aeternitatis: la conzettualizzazione del tempo nel pensiero tardomedievale (Florence: Olschki, 2000) 141–67.Google Scholar
Jung-Palczewska, Elzbieta. “Motion in a Vacuum and in a Plenum in Richard Kilvington’s Question: Utrum aliquod corpus simplex posset moveri aeque velociter in vacuo et in pleno from the ‘Commentary on the Physics’,” Miscellanea Medievalia 25 (1997) 179–93.Google Scholar
Jung-Palczewska, Elzbieta. “La question quodlibétique De infinitate vigoris Dei de Thomas de Wylton,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 64 (1997) 347–403.Google Scholar
Jung-Palczewska, Elzbieta. “Works by Richard Kilvington,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 67 (2000) 181–223.Google Scholar
Jung-Palczewska, Elzbieta. “Wylton’s Solution of the Aristotelian Problem of God’s Infinite Power,” in Marenbon, J. (ed.) Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages (Turnhout: Brepols, 1996) 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jüssen, Gabriel. “Wilhelm von Auvergne und die Transformation der scholastischen Philosophie im 13. Jahrhundert,” in Beckmann, J. P. et al. (eds.) Philosophie im Mittelalter (Hamburg: Meiner, 1987) 141–64.Google Scholar
Juste, David. “Neither Observation nor Astronomical Tables. An Alternative Way of Computing the Planetary Longitudes in the Early Western Middle Ages,” in Burnett, C. et al. (eds.) Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree (Leiden: Brill, 2004) 181–222.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, Ludger. “Erhard Knab von Zwiefalten († 1480): Improbatio modorum significandi. Edition nach den Handschriften,” in Dutz, K. D. (ed.) Individuation, Sympnoia panta, Harmonia, Emanation: Festgabe H. Schepers (Münster: Nodus, 2000) 109–55.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, Ludger. “‘Magister Sotphi’: Gerhard von Zutphens Glosa notabilis (1487–88) und die Geschichter der Grammatik im 15. Jahrhundert,” in Dutz, K. D. and Forsgren, K.-A. (eds.) History and Rationality (Münster: Nodus, 1995) 75–92.Google Scholar
Kaeppeli, Thomas. Le procès contre ThomasWaleys, O.P.: étude et documents (Rome: Ad S. Sabinae, 1936).Google Scholar
Kaeppeli, Thomas. Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Medii Aevi (Rome: Sabina, 1970–3).Google Scholar
Kalb, Herbert. Studien zur Summa Stephans von Tournai (Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1983).Google Scholar
Kaldellis, Anthony. The Argument of Psellos’ Chronographia (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “Le ‘De universali reali’ de Jean de Maisonneuve et les ‘epicuri litterales’,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 33 (1986) 469–516.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “Les débuts de l’albertisme tardif (Paris et Cologne),” in Hoenen, M. J. F. M. and Libera, A. (eds.) Albertus Magnus und der Albertismus: Deutsche philosophische Kultur des Mittelalters (Leiden: Brill, 1995) 207–95.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “Jérôme de Prague et le Timée de Platon,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen age 61 (1994) 59–104.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “La nature des écrits de Jean de Ripa,” Traditio 43 (1987) 257–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. Nicolas d’Autrécourt: ami de la vérité (Histoire littéraire de la France: suite du quatorzième siècle) (Paris: Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres, 1995).Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “L’œuvre théologique de Richard Brinkley, OFM,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 56 (1989) 169–273.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. Les querelles doctrinales à Paris: nominalistes et réalistes aux confins du XIVe et du XVe siècles (Bergamo: Lubrina, 1988).Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “Les sciences et leurs langages: Note sur le statut du 29 décembre 1340 et le prétendu statut perdu contre Ockham,” in Bianchi, L. (ed) Filosfia e teologia nel trecento: studi in ricordo di Eugenio Randi (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1994) 197–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminsky, Herbert. A History of the Hussite Revolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Kandler, Karl-Hermann, Mojsisch, Burkhard, and Stammkötter, Franz-Bernhard (eds.). Dietrich von Freiberg: neue Perspektiven seiner Philosophie, Theologie und Naturwissenschaft (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kann, Christoph. Die Eigenschaften der Termini: eine Untersuchung zur “Perutilis Logica” des Alberts von Sachsen (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann. “The Poetical Sermon of a Mediæval Jurist: Placentinus and His ‘Sermo de Legibus’,” Journal of the Warburg Institute 2 (1938) 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann and Buckland, W. W.. Studies in the Glossators of the Roman Law: Newly Discovered Writings of the 12th Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938; repr. Aalen: Scientia-Verlag, 1969).Google Scholar
Kapriev, Georgi. Ipsa vita et veritas: der ontologische Gottesbeweis und die Ideenwelt Anselms von Canterbury (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar
Kapriev, Georgi. “The Modern Study of Byzantine Philosophy,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 48 (2006) 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, George. “Plethon and Scholarios on Aristotle,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 253–82.Google Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “Richard Rufus’s Account of Substantial Transmutation,” Medioevo 27 (2002) 168–91.Google Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “La supposition materielle comme suppositions significative: Paul de Venice, Paul de Pergula,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 331–41.Google Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “Walter Burley’s Realism,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “William of Ockham, Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham on the Objects of Knowledge and Belief,” Vivarium 33 (1995) 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Bernard. “On a Sophisma of Richard Kilvington and a Problem of Analysis,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5 (1996) 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Steven T. (ed.). Saadiah Gaon (New York: Arno Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Kaukua, Jari. Avicenna on Subjectivity: A Philosophical Study (Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Kaye, Joel. Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century: Money, Market Exchange, and the Emergence of Scientific Thought (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Sharon. “Why the Liberty of Indifference Is Worth Wanting: Buridan’s Ass, Friendship, and Peter John Olivi,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004) 21–42.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, Alexander P. et al. The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Keele, Rondo. “Can God Make a Picasso? William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Divine Power and Real Relations,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007) 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Rondo. “The Logical and Scientific Treatises of John Chilmark (†1396),” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Rondo. “Oxford Quodlibeta from Ockham to Holcot,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 651–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Rondo. “The So-Called Res Theory of Walter Chatton,” Franciscan Studies 61 (2003) 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Rondo. “Walter Chatton,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/walter-chatton/.Google Scholar
Keen, Maurice. The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages (London: Routledge, 1965).Google Scholar
Kelley, Francis E.Robert Orford’s Attack on Giles of Rome,” The Thomist 51 (1987) 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Francis E.Some Observations on the Fictum Theory in Ockham and itsRelation to Hervaeus Natalis,” Franciscan Studies 38 (1978) 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Francis E.Two Early English Thomists: Thomas Sutton and Robert of Orford vs. Henry of Ghent,” The Thomist 45 (1981) 371–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Francis E.Walter Chatton vs. Aureoli and Ockham Regarding the Universal Concept,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 222–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, Menachem. “Dogma in Medieval Jewish Thought: A Bibliographical Survey,” Studies in Bibliography and Booklore 15 (1984) 5–21.Google Scholar
Kellner, Menachem. Dogma in Medieval Jewish Thought: From Maimonides to Abravanel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.La Physique d’Aristote et la phrase simple dans les traités de grammaire spéculative,” in Joly, A. and Stefanini, J. (eds.) La grammaire spéculative: des Modistes aux Idéologues (Lille: Presses universitaires, 1977) 105–24.Google Scholar
Kempshall, M. S.The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Angus J.Christine de Pizan: A Bibliographical Guide (London: Grant and Cutler, 1984).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A.The De anima of John Sharpe,” Franciscan Studies 29 (1969) 249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A.Mediaevalia. I. Robert Graystanes’ Commentary on the Sentences,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 53 (1986) 185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A.Peter of Ailly and the Harvest of Fourteenth-Century Philosophy (Lewiston, PA: E. Mellen Press, 1986.)Google Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A.The Philosophy of Robert Holcot, Fourteenth-Century Skeptic (Lewiston, PA: E. Mellen Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A.Robert Graystanes, O.S.B., on Essence and Existence,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 56 (1989) 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A. and Romano, Margaret E.. “John Went, O.F.M., and Divine Omnipotence,” Franciscan Studies 47 (1987) 138–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. “Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom,” in Kenny, A. (ed.) Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969) 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. “The Realism of De Universalibus,” in Kenny, A. (ed.) Wyclif in his Times (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) 17–29.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. Wyclif (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. (ed.). Wyclif in his Times (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony and Pinborg, Jan. “Medieval Philosophical Literature,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 11–42.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Aquinas and Weakness of Will,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007) 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Aristotle’s Ethics, Situationalist Psychology, and a Fourteenth-Century Debate,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (2008) 95–114.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Augustine’s Ethics,” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 205–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Evil in Later Medieval Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007) 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Habits and Virtues,” in Pope, S. J. (ed.) The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002) 116–30.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Rethinking Moral Dispositions: Scotus on the Virtues,” in Williams, Thomas (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 352–76.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. “Prophet and Reformer: Smoke in the Vineyard,” in Newman, B. (ed.) Voice of the Living Light: Hildegard of Bingen and herWorld (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B.The Sophistic Movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Kerner, Max. Johannes von Salisbury und die logische Struktur seines “Policraticus” (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1977).Google Scholar
Kéry, Lotte. Canonical Collections of the Early Middle Ages (ca. 400–1140) (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Keys, Mary. Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (tr.). Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Qamar-ud-Din. Al-Mawardi’s Theory of the State (Lahore: Islamic Book Foundation, 1983).Google Scholar
Khan, Qamar-ud-Din. The Political Thought of Ibn Taymiyah (Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1973).Google Scholar
Kholeif, Fathalla. A Study on Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and his Controversies in Transoxania (Beirut: Dar al-Machreq éditeurs, 1966).Google Scholar
Kieckhefer, Richard. “Mysticism and Social Consciousness in the Fourteenth Century,” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 48 (1978) 179–86.Google Scholar
Kieckhefer, Richard. Unquiet Souls: Fourteenth-Century Saints and their Religious Milieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Abelard’s Intentionalist Ethics,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995) 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions,” in MacDonald, S. and Stump, E. (eds.) Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999) 101–32.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and Individual Difference,” Philosophical Topics 20 (1992) 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. “Jean Buridan’s Philosophy of Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987) 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. “Late Scholastic Theories of the Passions: Controversies in the Thomist Tradition,” in Lagerlund, H. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.) Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002) 229–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. “Peter Abelard,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/abelard/.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Rethinking Representation in the Middle Ages,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007) 68–86.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Scholasticism and the Philosophy of Mind: The Failure of Aristotelian Psychology,” in Horowitz, T. and Janis, A. (eds.) Scientific Failure (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994) 109–38.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Scotus on Metaphysics,” in Williams, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, Raina. Die Syncategoremata des Wilhelm von Sherwood: Kommentierung und Historische Einordnung (Leiden: Brill, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirjavainen, Heikki. “Transcendental Elements in the Semantics of Crathorn,” in öm-Hintikka, G. Holmstr (ed.) Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000) 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, Stefan. Nicolaus Oresmes Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1997).Google Scholar
Kirwan, Christopher. Augustine (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Kleineidam, Erich. Das Problem der hylomorphen Zusammensetzung der geistigen Substanzen im 13. Jahrhundert, behandelt bis Thomas von Aquin (Breslau: Tesch, 1930).Google Scholar
Klibansky, Raymond. The Continuity of the Platonic Tradition during the Middle Ages: Outlines of a Corpus Platonicum Medii Aevi (London: Warburg Institute, 1939; repr. Munich: Kraus, 1981).Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Buridan’s Logic and the Ontology of Modes,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1999) 473–95.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Changing Role of Entia Rationis in Medieval Philosophy: A Comparative Study with a Reconstruction,” Synthese 96 (1993) 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan,” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2004) 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “‘Debeo tibi equum’: A Reconstruction of the Theoretical Framework of Buridan’s Treatment of the Sophisma,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic,” in Hieke, A. and Morscher, E. (eds.) New Essays in Free Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001) 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. John Buridan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Medieval Problem of Universals,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2004 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/universalsmedieval.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Nominalism,” in Brown, E. K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn (Boston: Elsevier, 2006) 8: 648–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of the Categories,” in Spade, P. V. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 118–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Peter of Spain, the Author of the Summulae,” in Gracia, J. J. E. and Noone, T. (eds.) A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003) 526–31.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “‘Socrates est species’: Logic, Metaphysics, and Psychology in St. Thomas Aquinas’ Treatment of a Paralogism,” in Jacobi, K. (ed.) Argumentationstheorie: Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns (Leiden: Brill, 1993) 489–504.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Syncategoremata,” in Brown, E. K. and Anderson, A. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn (Boston: Elsevier, 2006) 12: 353–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Thomas of Sutton on the Nature of the Intellective Soul and the Thomistic Theory of Being,” in Aertsen, J. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 436–55.Google Scholar
Kluge, E.-H.Roscelin and the Medieval Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976) 405–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluxen, Wolfgang. “Literargeschichtliches zum lateinischen Moses Maimonides,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954), 23–50.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Absoluta cuiuslibet attributed to P.H. Some Notes on its Transmission and the Use Made of it by Robert Kilwardby and Roger Bacon,” in Angelelli, I. and Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. (eds.) Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain: Acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2000) 373–403.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Absolutio: A Note on the Development of a Grammatical Notion,” in Rosier, I. (ed.) L’héritage des grammairiens latins, de l’antiquité aux lumières (Leuven: Peeters, 1988) 155–69.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Erfurt, Ampl. Q.70A: A Quaestiones-Commentary on the Second Part of Alexander de Villa Dei’s Doctrinale by Marsilius of Inghen? An Explorative Note on a Specimen of Conceptualist Grammar,” Vivarium 28 (1990) 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Grammar and Semantics in the Twelfth Century: Petrus Helias and Gilbert de la Porrée on the Substantive Verb,” in Kardaun, M. and Spruyt, J. (eds.) The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L.M. de Rijk (Leiden: Brill, 2000) 237–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Het Iudicium Constructionis: Het Leerstuk van de Constructio in de 2de Helft van de 12de Eeuw (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1987).Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Master Guido and his View on Government: On Twelfth-Century Linguistic Thought,” Vivarium 16 (1978) 108–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Mulier quae Damnavit Salvavit. A Note of the Early Development of the Relatio Simplex,” Vivarium 14 (1976) 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Mysterious Buser Again: William Buser of Heusden and the ‘Obligationes’ Tract ‘Ob rogatum’,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) Early Logic in Italy (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982) 147–66.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.On the Notion of Constructio in Conceptualist Grammar: Quaestio XXXV of the Doctrinale-Commentary Preserved in Erfurt, Amplon. Q. 70A and attributed to a Master Marcilius,” in Braakhuis, H. A. G. and Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (eds.) Marsilius of Inghen (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1992) 143–72.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Priscianic Tradition,” in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1995) 239–64.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Relatio simplex in the Grammatical Tracts of the Late Twelfth and Early Thirteenth Century,” Vivarium 15 (1977) 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Roger Bacon on the Double intellectus: A Note on the Development of the Theory of Congruitas and Perfectio in the First Half of the Thirteenth Century,” in Lewry, P. O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1985) 115–43.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Significatio generalis and significatio specialis: Notes on Nicholas of Paris’ Contribution to Early Thirteenth-Century Linguistic Thought,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1999) 17–43.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Some Notes on the Revival of Modistic Linguistics in the Fifteenth Century: Ps.-Johannes Versor and William Zenders of Weert,” in Friedman, R. L. and Ebbesen, S. (eds.) John Buridan and Beyond 1300–1700 (Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 2004) 69–119.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.‘Suppositio’ and ‘supponere’ in 12th-Century Grammar,” in Jolivet, J. and Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains: aux origines de la logica modernorum (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 325–51.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Tradition of Universal and Speculative Grammar in the Late Middle Ages,” in Merino, C. Codoñer et al. (eds.) El Brocense y la Humanidades en el siglo XVI (Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad, 2003) 33–60.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Transitivity, Intransitivity and Related Concepts in Twelfth-Century Grammar. An Explorative Study,” in Bursill-Hall, G. L. et al. (eds.) De ortu Grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.The Via antiqua and the Via moderna in Grammar: The Late Medieval Discussions on the Subject of the Sentence,” in Maierù, A. and Valente, L. (eds.) Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language (Florence: Olschki, 2004) 219–44.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.Willem Buser of Heusden’s Obligationes-Treatise ‘Ob rogatum’: A Ressourcement in the Doctrine of Logical Obligation?” in Jacobi, K. (ed.) Argumentationstheorie: scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns (Leiden: Brill, 1993) 343–62.Google Scholar
Knowles, David. The Evolution of Medieval Thought (New York: Vintage Books, 1962).Google Scholar
Knowles, David. The Religious Orders in England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948–9).Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. “The Emergence of the Logic of the Will in Medieval Thought,” in Matthews, G. B. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999) 207–21.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. “Time and Creation in Augustine,” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. “Trinitarian Sophisms in Robert Holcot’s Theology,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knysh, George. Fragments of Ockham Hermeneutics (Winnipeg: WCU Council of Learned Societies, 1997).Google Scholar
Knysh, George. Political Ockhamism (Winnipeg: WCU Council of Learned Societies, 1996).Google Scholar
Kobler, Franz. Letters of Jews through the Ages: From Biblical Times to the Middle of the Eighteenth Century (London: Ararat Publishing Society, 1953).Google Scholar
Koch, Georg. Manegold von Lautenbach und die Lehre von der Volkssouveränität unter Heinrich IV (Berlin: Ebering, 1902; repr. Vaduz: Kraus, 1965).Google Scholar
Koch, Josef. “Augustinischer und Dionysischer Neuplatonismus und das Mittelalter,” in Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) Platonismus in der Philosophie des Mittelalters (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969) 317–42.Google Scholar
Koch, Georg. Durandus de S. Porciano, O.P.: Forschungen zum Streit um Thomas von Aquin zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts (Münster: Aschendorff, 1927).Google Scholar
Koch, Georg. “Jakob von Metz O.P., der Lehrer des Durandus de S. Porciano, O.P.,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 4 (1929) 169–229.Google Scholar
Koch, Georg. “Neue Aktenstücke zu dem gegen Wilhelm Ockham in Avignon geführten Prozess,” in Kleine Schriften (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1973) II: 275–365.Google Scholar
Koch, Georg. “Der Prozess gegen den Magister Johannes de Polliaco und seine Vorgeschichte,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 5 (1933) 391–422.Google Scholar
Kogan, Barry. Averroes and the Metaphysics of Causation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Kogan, Barry. “Judah Halevi and his Use of Philosophy in the Kuzari,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, T.W.Der Begriff der Einheit und ihr ontologisches Prinzip nach dem Sentenzenkommentar des Jakob von Metz O.P. (Rome: Herder, 1971).Google Scholar
Köhler, T.W.Wissenschaft und Evidenz: Beobachtungen zum wissenschaftstheoretischen Ansatz des Jakob von Metz,” in Köhler, T. W. (ed.) Sapientiae procerum amore: mélanges médiévistes offerts à Dom Jean-Pierre Müller (Rome: Herder, 1974) 369–414.Google Scholar
Kölmel, W.Einheit und Zweiheit der Gewalt im Corpus Mysticum: zur Souveränitätslehre des Augustinus Triumphus,” Historische Jahrbuch 82 (1963) 103–47.Google Scholar
König, Dietrich. Tolomeo von Lucca: ein biographischer versuch (Harburg: Lühmann, 1878).Google Scholar
König-Pralong, Catherine. Avènement de l’aristotélisme en terre chrétienne (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Konstan, David. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpf, Ulrich. Religiöse Erfahrung in der Theologie Bernhards von Clairvaux (Tübingen: Mohr, 1980).Google Scholar
Korolec, J. B.Gilles d’Orléans et ses conceptions de philosophie morale,” in Asztalos, M. et al. (eds.) Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990) III: 224–33.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A.Aristotle’s Definition of Motion,” Phronesis 14 (1969) 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzia, P.περί του μήλου ή περί της αριστοτέλους τελευτής (Liber de Pomo sive De morte Aristotilis) (Thessaloniki: Ekdoseis Thyrathen, 2007).Google Scholar
Kovach, Francis Joseph and Shahan, Robert W. (eds.). Albert the Great: Commemorative Essays (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L.Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam: The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age (Leiden: Brill, 1986).Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L. (ed.) Perspectives on Maimonides: Philosophical and Historical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L.Philosophy in the Renaissance of Islam: Abu Sulayman al-Sijistani and his Circle (Leiden: Brill, 1986).Google Scholar
Kraus, Paul. Jābir ibn Ḥayyān: contribution à l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam (Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 1942–3).Google Scholar
Kraus, Paul. “Zu Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ,” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 14 (1934) 1–20; repr. in R. Brague (ed.) Alchemie, Ketzerei, Apokryphen im frühen Islam (Hildesheim: Olms, 1994) 89–108.Google Scholar
Krause, Feliks. “Abriss der Erkenntnistheorie bei Alexander von Alessandria,” Studia Mediewistyczne 20 (1980) 91–125.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “Moral Philosophy,” in Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 303–86.Google Scholar
Kremer, Klaus. Die neuplatonische Seinsphilosophie und ihre Wirkung auf Thomas von Aquin (Leiden: Brill 1966).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “Adam Wodeham’s anti-Aristotelian anti-Atomism,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1984) 381–98.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “The Culmination of the Old Logic in Peter Abelard,” in Benson, R. L. and Constable, J. (eds.) Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982) 488–511.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “A General Problem of Creation: Why Would God Create Anything at All?,” in MacDonald, S. (ed.) Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991) 208–28.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “Lex iniusta non est lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas’ Court of Conscience,” in Finnis, J. (ed.) Natural Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1991) II: 99–121.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “Socrates is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White,” Noûs 11 (1977) 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “Syncategoremata, Exponibilia, Sophismata,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan (eds.). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. 1100–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, EleonoreThe Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, EleonoreThe Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. 1: Logic and the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Krey, Philip D.W. and Smith, Lesley (eds.). Nicholas of Lyra: The Senses of Scripture (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Krieger, Gerhard. Der Begriff der praktischen Vernunft nach Johannes Buridanus (Münster: Aschendorff, 1986).Google Scholar
Krieger, Gerhard. “Studies on Walter Burley, 1989–1997,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Gerhard. Subjekt und Metaphysik: Die Metaphysik des Johannes Buridan (Münster: Aschendorff, 2003).Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The School of Salerno: Its Development and its Contribution to the History of Learning,” in Storia e Letteratura: Raccolta di studi e testi 54: Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1956) 287–336.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar et al. (eds.). Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries: Annotated Lists and Guides (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1960–).Google Scholar
Kritzeck, James. Peter the Venerable and Islam (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, Karl. Des Ptolomäus Lucensis Leben und Werke (Göttingen: Huth, 1874).Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “Averroes and the Teleological Argument,” Religious Studies 38 (2002) 405–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “The Impossible, insofar as it Is Possible: Ibn Rushd and Buridan on Logic and Natural Theology,” in Perler, D. and Rudolph, U. (eds.) Logik und Theologie: das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter (Leiden: Brill, 2005) 447–67.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “No Man Is an Island: Nature and Neo-Platonic Ethics in Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008) 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “Possible Worlds in the Tahâfut al-falâsifa: Al-Ghazâlî on Creation and Contingency,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2000) 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. Averroïsme bolonais au XIVe siècle (Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 1965).Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. De Siger de Brabant à Jacques de Plaisance: la théorie de l’intellect chez les averroïstes latins des XIIIe et XIVe siècles (Wroclaw: Editions de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences, 1968).Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. “Guillaume d’Alnwick: trois questions anti-averroistes sur l’âme intellect,” Studia Mediewistyczne 7 (1966) 3–76.Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. “Paolo Veneto e la sua teoria dell’anima,” in Olivieri, L. (ed.) Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna (Padua: Antenore, 1983) 130–64.Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. “Some Remarks on Erfurt Averroists,” Studia Mediewistyczne 32 (1997) 93–121.Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. “Der Theorie der Materie des Aegidius von Orléans,” in Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O. (eds.) Historia philosophiae medii aevi: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters: Festschrift für Kurt Flasch (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991) 521–34.Google Scholar
Kunitzsch, Paul. “über das Frühstadium der arabischen Aneignung antiken Gutes,” Saeculum 26 (1975) 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künzle, Pius. Das Verhältnis der Seele zu ihren Potenzen: Problemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen von Augustin bis und mit Thomas von Aquin (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1956).Google Scholar
Kürzinger, Josef. Alfonsus Vargas Toletanus und seine theologische einleitungslehre: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Scholastik im 14. Jahrhundert (Münster: Aschendorff, 1930).Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. “Did Rolandus of Bologna Write a ‘Stroma ex Decretorum, corpore captum’?”, Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law, n.s. 20 (1990) 69–70.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. Gratian and the Schools of Law, 1140–1234 (London: Variorum Reprints, 1983).Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. “Graziano: L’uomo e l’opera,” Studia Gratiana 1 (1953) 17–29.Google Scholar
Laakmann, Reinhold. Die Königsgewalt bei Manegold von Lautenbach (Hamburg: Lüdke bei der Uni, 1969).Google Scholar
Laarmann, Matthias. Deus, primum cognitum: die Lehre von Gott als dem Ersterkannten des menschlichen Intellekts bei Heinrich von Gent (†1293) (Münster: Aschendorff, 1999).Google Scholar
Laberge, Damascus. “Fr. Petri Ioannis Olivi, O.F.M., tria scripta sui ipsius apologetica annorum 1283 et 1285,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 28 (1935) 115–55, 374–407.Google Scholar
Laberge, Damascus. “Responsio quam fecit Petrus [Ioannis] ad litteram magistrorum, praesentatam sibi in Avinione,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 28 (1935) 115–55, 374–407.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Yves. Ibn Khaldun: The Birth of History and the Past of the Third World (London: Verso, 1984).Google Scholar
Ladner, Pascal. Revolutionäre Kirchenkritik am Basler Konzil? Zum Konziliarismus des Heymericus de Campo (Basel: Verlag Helbing und Lichtenhahn, 1985).Google Scholar
Lafleur, Claude. Quatre introductions à la philosophie au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1988).Google Scholar
Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne (eds.). L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: autour du “Guide de l’étudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, JoanneLa ‘Philosophia’ d’Hervé le Breton (alias Henri le Breton) et le recueil d’introductions à la philosophie du ms. Oxford, Corpus Christi College 283,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 61 (1994) 149–226; 62 (1995) 359–442.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. “Pietro d’Abano and the Anatomy of Perception,” in Knuuttila, S. and Kärkkäinen, P. (eds.) Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008) 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. (ed.). Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko (eds.). Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahey, Stephen. Philosophy and Politics in the Thought of John Wyclif (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertini, Roberto. “Felicitas politica und speculatio: die Idee der Philosophie in ihrem Verhältnis zur Politik nach Johannes von Jandun,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26 (1998) 984–90.Google Scholar
Lambertini, Roberto. “Political Quodlibeta,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 439–74.Google Scholar
Lambertini, Roberto. “Sicut tabernarius vinum significat per circulum: Directions in Contemporary Interpretations of the Modistae,” in Eco, U. and Marmo, C. (eds.) On the Medieval Theories of Signs (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1989) 107–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambton, Ann. State and Government in Medieval Islam: An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Political Thought: The Jurists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann. Theory and Practice in Medieval Persian Government (London: Variorum Reprints, 1980).Google Scholar
Lameer, Joep. Al-Farabi and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, John C.The Biography of Theodore Abū Qurrah Revisited,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 56 (2002) 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgraf, A. M.Dogmengeschichte der Früh Scholastik (Regensburg: Pustet, 1952–6).Google Scholar
Landgraf, A. M.Introduction à l’histoire de la littérature théologique de la scolastique naissante, tr. Landry, A.M. and Geiger, L.-B. (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1973).Google Scholar
Landgraf, A. M.Der Porretanismus der Homilien des Radulphus Ardens,” Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 64 (1940) 132–48.Google Scholar
Landsberg, Ernst. Die Glosse des Accursius und ihre Lehre vom Eigenthum: rechts-und dogmengeschichtliche Untersuchungen (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1883).Google Scholar
Lang, Albert. Heinrich Totting von Oyta: ein Beitrag zur Entstehungsgeschichte der ersten deutschen Universitäten und zur Problemsgeschichte der Spätscholastik (Münster: Aschendorff, 1937).Google Scholar
Lang, Helen. The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Place and the Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langermann, Tzvi. “Maimonides and the Sciences,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langholm, Odd. The Aristotelian Analysis of Usury (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. Economics in the Medieval Schools: Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money and Usury According to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350 (Leiden: Brill, 1992).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langholm, Odd. The Merchant in the Confessional: Trade and Price in Pre-Reformation Penitential Handbooks (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. Price and Value in the Aristotelian Tradition (Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1979).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. Wealth and Money in the Aristotelian Tradition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Laoust, Henri. La politique de Gazali (Paris: Geuthner, 1970).Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael, Leonardi, Claudio, and Garfagnini, Gian Carlo (eds.). Compendium Auctorum Latinorum Medii Aevi: 500–1500 (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000–).Google Scholar
Lapparent, Pierre. “L’œuvre politique de François de Meyronnes, ses rapports avec celle de Dante,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 15–7 (1940–2) 5–151.Google Scholar
Larchet, Jean-Claude. Thérapeutique des maladies spirituelles: une introduction à la tradition ascétique de l’Eglise orthodoxe (Paris: Cerf, 1997).Google Scholar
Largier, Niklaus. Bibliographie zu Meister Eckhart (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg, 1989).Google Scholar
La Salle, John and Blythe, James. “Was Ptolemy of Lucca a Civic Humanist? Reflections on a Newly-Discovered Manuscript of Hans Baron,” History of Political Thought 26 (2005) 236–65.Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J.Jewish-Christian Polemics at the Turning Point: Jewish Evidence from the Twelfth Century,” Harvard Theological Review 89 (1996) 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J.Jewish Philosophical Polemics against Christianity in the Middle Ages (New York: Ktav Publication House, 1977).Google Scholar
Laumakis, John. “Aquinas’ Misinterpretation of Avicebron on the Activity of Corporeal Substances: Fons Vitae II, 9 and 10,” Modern Schoolman 81 (2004) 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, M. H.Armandus de Bevézer et son commentaire sur le De ente et essentia,” Revue Thomiste 35 (1930) 426–36.Google Scholar
Laurent, M. H.Le bienheureux Innocent V (Pierre de Tarentaise) et son temps (Vatican: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1947).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. “La grammaire latine durant le haut moyen âge,” in Auroux, S. (ed.) Histoire des idées linguistiques (Liège: Mardaga, 1992) II: 83–95.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages (London: Longman, 1997).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. (ed). History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien. The History of Linguistics in Europe, from Plato to 1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, Brian. The Prose Salernitan Questions: An Anonymous Collection Dealing with Science and Medicine Written by an Englishman c. 1200 with an Appendix of Ten Related Collections (London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1979).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. The Salernitan Questions. An Introduction to the History of Medieval and Renaissance Problem Literature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Lawrence, Bruce. Ibn Khaldun and Islamic Ideology (Leiden: Brill, 1984).Google Scholar
Lawrence, C. H.The Letters of Adam Marsh and the Franciscan School at Oxford,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 42 (1991) 218–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzarini, Andrea. “Gratianus de Urbeveteri,” Studia Gratiana 4 (1956) 1–15.Google Scholar
Lea, Henry. A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences in the Latin Church (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1896).Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. Averroes and his Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. (ed.). The Biographical Encyclopaedia of Islamic Philosophy (London: Thoemmes, 2006).Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. “Ibn Bājja on Society and Philosophy,” Islam 57 (1980) 109–19.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. Moses Maimonides (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Le Bras, Gabriel and Gaudemet, Jean. Histoire du droit et des institutions de l’Eglise en Occident (Paris: Cujas, 1955–8).Google Scholar
Lechner, Joseph. “Die Quästionen des Sentenzkommentars des Joh. v. Rodington O.F.M.,” Franziskanische Studien 22 (1935) 232–48.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. “Ad ipsam sophiam Christum: das monastische Zeugnis Abaelards,” in Hoffmann, F. et al. (eds.) Sapienter ordinare: Festgabe für Erich Kleineidam (Leipzig: Benno, 1969) 179–98.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. “‘Ad ipsam sophiam Christum’: le témoignage monastique d’Abélard,” Revue d’ascétique et de mystique 46 (1970) 161–81.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. L’amour des lettres et le désir de Dieu: initiation aux auteurs monastiques du moyen âge (Paris: Cerf, 1957).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Jean de Paris et l’écclésiologie du XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1942).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. “Lettres d’Odon d’Ourscamp, cardinal cistercien,” Studia Anselmiana 37 (1955) 145–57.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Monks and Love in Twelfth-Century France: Psycho-Historical Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. “Pour l’histoire de l’expression ‘philosophie chrétienne’,” Mélanges de sciences religieuses 9 (1952) 221–6.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Saint Pierre Damien, ermite et homme d’eglise (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1960).Google Scholar
Ledoux, Athanasius. “De gratia creata et increata juxta Quaestiones ineditam Guillelmi de Ware,” Antonianum 5 (1930) 148–56.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Charles. “‘Aequitas canonica’ et ‘periculum animae’ dans la doctrine de l’Hostiensis,” Ephemerides Iuris Canonici 8 (1952) 305–21.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Charles. “épikie,” in Naz, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire du droit canonique (Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1935–65) V: 364–75.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Charles. Les pouvoirs du juge en droit canonique (Paris: Sirey, 1938).Google Scholar
Lefévre, Georges. De Anselmo Laudunensi Scholastico (1050–1117) (Evreux: Hérissey, 1895).Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Bradwardine and the Pelagians: A Study of His ‘De Causa Dei’ and its Opponents (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Gregory of Rimini: Tradition and Innovation in Fourteenth Century Thought (New York: Manchester, 1961).Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Medieval Thought St Augustine to Ockham (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1958).Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Richard Fitzralph, commentator of the Sentences: A Study in Theological Orthodoxy (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Leicht, Irene. Marguerite Porete: eine fromme Intellektuelle und die Inquisition (Freiburg: Herder, 1999).Google Scholar
Leinkauf, Thomas. Nicolaus Cusanus: eine Einführung (Münster: Aschendorff, 2006).Google Scholar
Leinkauf, Thomas and Steel, Carlos (eds.). Platons Timaios als Grundtext der Kosmologie in Spätantike, Mittelalter und Renaissance (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Lemay, Richard J.Abu Ma‘shar and Latin Aristotelianism in the Twelfth Century: The Recovery of Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy through Arabic Astrology (Beirut: American University of Beirut, Publications of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 1962).Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul. Le premier humanisme byzantin (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1971).Google Scholar
Leonardi, Claudio. “Intellectual Life,” in Reuter, T. (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. III: c.900–c.1024 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 186–211.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Susanne. Der Richter und die Zeugen: eine Untersuchung anhand des Tractatus testimoniorum des Bartolus von Sassoferrato (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2003).Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph (ed.). Maimonides. Empire of Light: Popular Enlightenment in an Age of Belief (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Lerner, RalphNatural Law in Albo’s Book of Roots,” in Cropsey, J. (ed.) Ancients and Moderns: Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss (New York: Basic Books, 1964) 132–47.Google Scholar
Lerner, RalphThe Heresy of the Free Spirit in the Later Middle Ages (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Lescoe, Francis. God as First Principle in Ulrich of Strasbourg (New York: Alba House, 1979).Google Scholar
Lesne, émile. Histoire de la propriété ecclésiastique en France, vol. V: Les écoles de la fin du VIIIe siècle à la fin du XIIe (Lille: Facultés catholiques, 1940).Google Scholar
Lettinck, Paul. Aristotle’s Meteorology and its Reception in the Arab World, with an Edition and Translation of Ibn Suwār’s Treatise on Meteorological Phenomena and of Ibn Bajja’s Commentary on the Meteorology (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar
Lettinck, Paul. Aristotle’s Physics and its Reception in the Arabic World with an Edition of the Unpublished Parts of Ibn Bajja’s Commentary on the Physics (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Levenson, Jonathan. Resurrection and the Restoration of Israel: The Ultimate Victory of the God of Life (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Levy, Ian C.A Companion to John Wyclif: Late Medieval Theologian (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Levy, Ian C.John Wyclif: Scriptural Logic, Real Presence, and the Parameters Of Orthodoxy (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Levy, Raphael. The Astrological Works of Abraham Ibn Ezra (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1927).Google Scholar
Lewin, Bernhard. “L’ideal antique du philosophe dans la tradition arabe: un traité d’éthique du philosophe Baghdadien Ibn Suwar,” Lychnos 1954–55 (1955) 267–84.Google Scholar
Lewin, Bernhard. “La notion de muḥdath dans le kalām et dans la philosophie: un petit traité du philosophe chrétien Ibn Suwar,” Orientalia Suecana 3 (1954) 84–93.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. The Political Languages of Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. and Langford, C. H.. Symbolic Logic (New York: The Century Co., 1932).Google Scholar
Lewis, Ewart.The ‘Positivism’ of Marsilius of Padua,” Speculum 38 (1963) 541–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Neil. “The First Recension of Robert Grosseteste’s De libero arbitrio,” Mediaeval Studies 53 (1991) 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Neil. “William of Auvergne’s Account of the Enuntiable: Its Relations to Nominalism and the Doctrine of the Eternal Truths,” Vivarium 33 (1995) 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewry, P. Osmund. “Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric 1220–1320,” in Catto, J. (ed.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. I: The Early Oxford Schools (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984) 401–33.Google Scholar
Lewry, P. Osmund. “The Liber sex principiorum, a Supposedly Porretanean Work: A Study in Ascription,” in Jolivet, J. and Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 251–78.Google Scholar
Lewry, P. Osmund. “Robertus Angelicus and the Italian Kilwardby,” in Maierù, A. (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1983) 33–51.Google Scholar
Lewry, P. Osmund. “Two Continuators of Aquinas: Robertus de Vulgarbia and Thomas Sutton,” Mediaeval Studies 43 (1981) 58–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewy, H., et al. (trs.). Three Jewish Philosophers (New York: Atheneum, 1985).Google Scholar
Liebeschütz, Hans. “The Debate on Philosophical Learning during the Transition Period (900– 1080),” in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970) 587–610.Google Scholar
Liebeschütz, Hans. Medieval Humanism in the Writings of John of Salisbury (London: Warburg Institute of the University of London, 1950).Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C.Alhazen’s Theory of Vision and its Reception in the West,” Isis 58 (1967) 321–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, David C.Alkindi’s Critique of Euclid’s Theory of Vision,” Isis 62 (1971) 469–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, David C. (ed. and tr.). John Pecham and the Science of Optics (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1970).Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C.Lines of Influence in Thirteenth-Century Optics: Bacon, Witelo, and Pecham,” Speculum 46 (1971) 66–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, David C.The ‘Perspectiva Communis’ of John Pecham: Its Influence, Sources and Content,” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences 18 (1965) 37–53.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C.Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C.Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Lindner, Benedikt. Die Erkenntnislehre des Thomas von Strassburg (Münster: Aschendorff, 1930).Google Scholar
Liotta, Filippo and Tofanini, Roberto (eds.). Miscellanea, Rolando Bandinelli, Papa Alessandro III (Siena: Accademia senese degli intronati, 1986).Google Scholar
Little, A. G.The Franciscan School at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 19 (1926) 803–74.Google Scholar
Little, A. G.Roger Bacon Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Little, A. G. and Pelster, Franz. Oxford Theology and Theologians, c.A.D. 1282–1302 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar
Little, Lester. Religious Poverty and the Profit Economy in the High Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Little, Lester. “Les techniques de la confession et la confession comme technique,” in Faire croire: modalités de la diffusion et de la réception des messages religieux du XIIe au XVe siècle (Rome: école française de Rome, 1981) 87–99.Google Scholar
Livanos, Christopher. Greek Tradition and Latin Influence in the Work of George Scholarios: Alone against All of Europe (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Livesey, Steven. “Robert Graystanes O.S.B. on the Subalternation of Sciences,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 61(1994) 236–72.Google Scholar
Livesey, Steven. Theology and Science in the Fourteenth Century: Three Questions on the Unity and Subalternation of the Sciences from John of Reading’s Commentary on the “Sentences” (Leiden: Brill, 1989).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C.The Anatomy of Neoplatonism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C.The Aristotelianism of Eustratios of Nicaea,” in Wiesner, J. (ed.) Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung II (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987) 341–51.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C.Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic,” Phronesis 1 (1955–6) 58–72, 146–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, Diana. “‘Silence is Praise to You’: Maimonides on Negative Theology, Looseness of Expression, and Religious Experience,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2002) 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Cascio, Renzo. “La predica del predicare di San Bernardino,” in d’Episcopo, F. (ed.) San Bernardino da Siena Predicatore e Pellegrino (Galatinna: Congedo, 1985) 63–73.Google Scholar
Lochrie, Karma. Margery Kempe and Translations of the Flesh (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Loewe, Raphael. Ibn Gabirol (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1989).Google Scholar
Lohr, Charles H.Latin Aristotle Commentaries, V: Bibliography of Secondary Literature (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2005).Google Scholar
Lohr, Charles H.Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries,” Traditio 23 (1967) 314–413; 24 (1968) 194–245; 26 (1970) 135–216; 27 (1971) 251–351; 28 (1972) 281–396; 29 (1973) 93–197; 30 (1974) 119–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (tr.). The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Long, R. James. “The First Oxford Debate on the Eternity of theWorld,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 54–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. James. “The Moral and Spiritual Theology of Richard Fishacre: Edition of Trinity Coll. (Cambridge) MS 0.1.30,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 60 (1990) 5–143.Google Scholar
Long, R. James. “Of Angels and Pinheads: The Contributions of the Early Oxford Masters to the Doctrine of Spiritual Matter,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998) 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. James. “Richard Fishacre’s Treatise De libero arbitrio,” in Bazán, B. C. et al. (eds.) Moral and Political Philosophies in the Middle Ages (Ottawa: Legas, 1995) 879–91.Google Scholar
Long, R. James. “Richard Fishacre’s Way to God,” in Link-Salinger, R. et al. (eds.) A Straight Path: Studies in Medieval Philosophy and Culture. Essays in Honor of Arthur Hyman (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1988) 174–82.Google Scholar
Long, R. James. “The Science of Theology According to Richard Fishacre: Edition of the Prologue to his Commentary on the Sentences,” Mediaeval Studies 34 (1972) 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. James and Noone, Timothy. “Fishacre and Rufus on the Metaphysics of Light: Two Unedited Texts,” in Hamesse, J. (ed.) Roma, magister mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offérts au Père L. E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 517–48.Google Scholar
Longère, Jean. “Pauvreté et richesse chez quelques prédicateurs durant la seconde moitié du XIIe siècle,” in Mollat, M. (ed.) études sur l’histoire de la pauvreté (Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1974) I: 255–73.Google Scholar
Longo, Carlo (ed.). Magister Raimundus: atti del Convegno per il IV centenario della canonizzazione di San Raimondo de Penyafort, 1601–2001 (Rome: Istituto storico domenicano, 2002).Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Bartolommeo di Bologna, un maestro francescano del sec. XIII,” Studi Francescani 9 (1923) 365–84.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Le commentaire sur les Sentences de Guillaume de Nottingham O.F.M.,” Archivum Franciscanun Historicum 22 (1929) 232–33.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Fr Thomas d’York,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 19 (1926) 875–930.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Gonsalve de Balboa et le B. Duns Scot,” études Franciscaines 36 (1924) 640–5; 37 (1925) 170–82.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Jean de Reading et le B. Jean Duns Scot,” La France Franciscaine 7 (1924) 99–109.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “Maîtres franciscains de Paris: Guillaume de Ware OFM,” La France Franciscaine 5 (1922) 71–82.Google Scholar
Longpré, Efrem. “L’œuvre scolastique du cardinal Jean de Murro, O.F.M. (†1312),” in Mélanges Auguste Pelzer (Leuven: Bibliothèque de l’Université, 1947) 467–92.Google Scholar
Lopez, Robert. The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Sönke. Studium generale erfordense: zum Erfurter Schulleben im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1989).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Sönke. “Thomas Manlefelt (Maulefelt): zu Leben und Werk,” in Kintzinger, M. et al. (eds.) Schule und Schüler im Mittelalter: Beiträge zur europäischen Bildungsgeschichte des 9. bis 15. Jahrhunderts (Cologne: Böhlau, 1996) 145–64.Google Scholar
Lot-Borodine, Myrrha. Un maître de la spiritualité byzantine au XIVe siècle: Nicolas Cabasilas (Paris: éditions de l’Orante, 1958).Google Scholar
Loth, Bernard and Michel, Albert (eds.). Dictionnaire de théologie catholique (Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1953–72).Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Un commentaire sur les Sentences attribués d’Odon Rigaud,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 7 (1935) 402.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. Le droit naturel chez Thomas d’Aquin et ses prédécesseurs, 2nd edn (Bruges: Beyaert, 1931).Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Le premier commentaire connu des Sentences de Pierre Lombard,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 8 (1938) 64–71.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles (Gembloux: Duculot, 1948–60).Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Robert Cowton et Jean Duns Scot,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954) 281–94.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Les vertus morales acquises sont-elles vraies vertus? La réponse de théologiens de Pierre Abelard à St. Thomas d’Aquin,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiéval 20 (1953) 13–39.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Les vertus morales acquises sont-elles vraies vertus? La réponse de théologiens de saint Thomas d’Aquin à Pierre Auriol,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954), 100–29.Google Scholar
Lourdaux, Willem and Verhelst, Daniel (eds.). TheConcept of Heresy in theMiddle Ages (11th–13th c.) (Leuven: Louvain University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Lowe, Elizabeth. The Contested Theological Authority of Thomas Aquinas: The Controversies between Hervaeus Natalis and Durandus of St. Pourcain (New York: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Lucentini, Paolo.L’eresia di Amalrico,” in Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) Eriugena Redivivus (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1987) 174–91.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. “Early Medieval Commentary on Priscian’s Institutiones Grammaticae,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 71 (2000) 115–88.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. “Glosses Based on Eriugena’s Priscian Commentary,” Miscellanea Bibliothecae Apostolicae Vaticanae 7 (2000) 199–213.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. “A Priscian Commentary Attributed to Eriugena,” in Auroux, S. (ed.) History of Linguistics 1999: Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2003) 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Concetta. “Review of Rainer Thiel, Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen,” in Mnemosyne 54 (2001) 482–504.Google Scholar
Luongo, F. Thomas.The Saintly Politics of Catherine of Siena (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.Francois de Meyronnes and Hierarchy,” in Wilks, M. and Wood, D. (eds.) The Church and Sovereignty c.590–1918: Essays in Honour of MichaelWilks (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991) 225–31.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.The Hierarchies in the Writings of Alan of Lille, William of Auvergne and St Bonaventure,” in Iribarren, I. and Lenz, M. (eds.) Angels in Medieval Philosophical Enquiry (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008) 15–28.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.Hrabanus Maurus and the Predestination Controversy,” in Felten, F. J. and Nichtweiss, B. (eds.) Hrabanus Maurus. Gelehrter, Abt von Fulda und Erzbischof von Mainz (Mainz: Publikationen Bistum Mainz, 2006) 141–58.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.John of Salisbury: A Bibliography, 1953–82,” in Wilks, M. (ed.) The World of John of Salisbury (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984) 445–57.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.The Lex divinitatis in the Bull Unam Sanctam of Pope Boniface VIII,” in Brooke, C. et al. (eds.) Church and Government in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976) 205–21.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.Medieval Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Luscombe, David.The School of Peter Abelard: The Influence of Abelard’s Thought in the Early Scholastic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John E.The Theory of Knowledge of Vital du Four (St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1972).Google Scholar
Lynch, Kilianus. “De distinctione intentionali apud mag. J. Baconthorpe,” Analecta Ordinis Carmelitarum 7 (1931) 351–404.Google Scholar
McAodha, Loman. “The Nature and Efficacy of Preaching According to St. Bernandine of Siena,” Franciscan Studies 27 (1967) 221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccagnolo, Enzo. “David of Dinant and the Beginning of Aristotelianism in Paris,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccagnolo, Enzo. Rerum universitas: Saggio sulla filosofia di Teodorico di Chartres (Florence: Le Monnier, 1976).Google Scholar
McCall, John P.Chaucer and John of Legnano,” Speculum 40 (1965) 484–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, John P.The Writings of John of Legnano,” Traditio 23 (1967) 415–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacClintock, Stuart.Perversity and Error: Studies on the “Averroist” John of Jandun (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “The Roots of Ethical Voluntarism.” Vivarium 39 (2001) 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, George. Early Medieval Theology (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1957).Google Scholar
McCready, William. “The Papal Sovereign in the Ecclesiology of Augustinus Triumphus,” Medieval Studies 39 (1977) 117–205.Google Scholar
McCullough, E. J. “St. Albert on Motion as Forma Fluens and Fluxus Formae,” in Weisheipl, J. A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1980) 129–53.Google Scholar
McDermott, A. C.Materials for an Archaeological Analysis of Richard Campsall’s Logic,” in Bursill-Hall, G. L. et al. (eds.) De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Scott (ed.). Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
MacDonald, ScottGoodness as Transcendental: The Early Thirteenth-Century Recovery of an Aristotelian Idea,” Topoi 11 (1992) 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, James. “John Scottus Eriugena and Thomas Gallus, Commentators on the Mystical Theology,” in McEvoy, J. and Dunne, M. (eds.) History and Eschatology in Eriugena and his Time (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002) 183–202.Google Scholar
McEvoy, James. The Philosophy of Robert Grosseteste (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).Google Scholar
McEvoy, James. Robert Grosseteste (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
McEvoy, James. Robert Grosseteste, Exegete and Philosopher (Aldershot: Variorum, 1994).Google Scholar
McEvoy, James. (ed.). Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives on his Thought and Scholarship (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995).Google Scholar
McFarlane, K. B.John Wycliffe and the Beginnings of English Nonconformity (London: English Universities Press, 1952).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.The Calabrian Abbot: Joachim of Fiore in the History of Western Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1985).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.The Flowering of Mysticism: Men and Women in the New Mysticism (1200–1350), vol. III of The Presence of God: A History of Western Christian Mysticism (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.The Golden Chain: A Study in the Theological Anthropology of Isaac of Stella (Washington, DC: Cistercian Publications, 1969).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.Harvest of Mysticism in Medieval Germany, vol. IV of The Presence of God: A History of Western Christian Mysticism (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.Meister Eckhart and the BeguineMystics: Hadwijch of Brabant, Mechtild of Magdeburg, and Marguerite of Porete (New York: Continuum, 1994).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard.The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. (tr.). Three Treatises on Man: A Cistercian Anthropology (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1977).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard and Otten, Willemien (eds.). Eriugena: East and West (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
McGinnis, Jon.Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian,” Phronesis 51 (2006) 140–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Jon.Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003) 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Jon and Reisman, David C. (trs.). Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2007).Google Scholar
McGrade, A. S. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrade, A. S.Enjoyment at Oxford after Ockham: Philosophy, Psychology and the Love of God,” in Hudson, A. and Wilks, M. (eds.) From Ockham to Wyclif (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987) 63–88.Google Scholar
McGrade, A. S.The Political Thought of William of Ockham: Personal and Institutional Principles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974; repr. 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrade, A. S.“William of Ockham and Augustinus de Ancona on the Righteousness of Dissent,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–7) 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrade, A. S., Kilcullen, John, and Kempshall, Matthew (trs.). Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. II: Ethics and Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister. Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
McGuire, , Patrick, Brian (ed.). A Companion to Jean Gerson (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
McGuire, , Patrick, BrianThe Difficult Saint: Bernard of Clairvaux and his Tradition (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1991).Google Scholar
McGuire, , Patrick, BrianJean Gerson and the Last Medieval Reformation (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
McInerney, Maud Burnett (ed.). Hildegard of Bingen: A Book of Essays (New York: Garland, 1998).Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. Aquinas against the Averroists: On There Being Only One Intellect (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. Aquinas and Analogy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998).Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. Boethius and Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1990).Google Scholar
McKeon, Richard. Selections from Medieval Philosophers (New York: Scribners, 1930).Google Scholar
Mackie, Evelyn A. and Goering, Joseph (eds.). Editing Robert Grosseteste (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L.Evil and Omnipotence,” Mind 64 (1955) 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, William.Radulphus Brito on the Sufficiency of the Categories,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 39 (1981) 81–96.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eighth Centuries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. Voting about God in Early Church Councils (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
McNeill, John. “Medicine for Sin as Prescribed in the Penitentials,” Church History 1 (1932) 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, Enya. “Geoffrey of Aspall’s Commentaries on Aristotle,” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 6 (1968) 94–134.Google Scholar
Maddocks, Fiona. Hildegard of Bingen: The Woman of her Age (New York: Doubleday, 2001).Google Scholar
Madec, Goulven. Jean Scot et ses auteurs: annotations érigéniennes (Paris: études Augustiniennes, 1988).Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. “Abu’l MuʿĪn al-NasafĪ and AshʿarĪ Theology,” in Hillenbrand, C. (ed.) Studies in Honour of C.E. Bosworth (Leiden: Brill, 2000) II: 318–30.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. “Nasir al-Din Tusi’s Ethics Between Philosophy, Shiʿism, and Sufism,” in Hovannisian, R. G. (ed.) Ethics in Islam (Malibu, CA: Undena, 1985) 85–101.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. “The Origins of the Controversy Concerning the Creation of the Koran,” in Barral, J. M. (ed.) Orientalia hispanica sive studia F.M. Pareja octogenario dicata (Leiden: Brill, 1974) 504–25.Google Scholar
Madigan, Kevin. Olivi and the Interpretation of Matthew in the High Middle Ages (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Alfarabi and the Foundation of Islamic Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Ibn Khaldun’s Philosophy of History (London: Allen and Unwin, 1957).Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. “Language and Logic in Classical Islam,” in Grunebaum, G. E. von (ed.) Logic in Classical Islamic Culture (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1970) 51–83.Google Scholar
Mahoney, E. P.Themes and Problems in the Psychology of John of Jandun,” in Wippel, J. F. (ed.) Studies in Medieval Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1987) 273–88.Google Scholar
Mahoney, E. P.Themistius and the Agent Intellect in James of Viterbo and Other Thirteenth-Century Philosophers,” Augustiniana 23 (1973) 422–67.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft, 2nd edn (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1952).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. Metaphysische Hintergründe der Spätscholastischen Naturphilosophie (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1955).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. “Das Problem der Evidenz in der Philosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts,” in Maier, A. (ed.) Ausgehendes Mittelalter: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Geistesgeschichte des 14. Jahrhunderts (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1967) II: 367–418.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. “Wilhelm von Alnwicks Bologneser Quaestiones gegen den Averroismus (1323),” Gregorianum 30 (1949) 265–308.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. Zwei Grundprobleme der Scholastischen Naturphilosophie, 3rd edn (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1968).Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1958).Google Scholar
Maierù, Alfonso (ed.) English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1982).Google Scholar
Maierù, AlfonsoLa linguistica medievale: filosofia del linguaggio,” in Lepschy, G. (ed.) Storia della linguistica (Bologna: Mulino, 1990) II: 101–37.Google Scholar
Maierù, AlfonsoLogica aristotelica e teologia trinitaria, Enrico Totting da Oyta,” in Mairù, A. and Bagliani, A. Paravicini (eds.) Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1981) 496–512.Google Scholar
Maierù, AlfonsoLogica e teologia trinitaria nel commento alle sentenze attribuito a Petrus Thomae,” in Jolivet, J. et al. (eds.) Lectionum varietates: hommage à Paul Vignaux, 1904–1987 (Paris: Vrin, 1991) 177–98.Google Scholar
Maierù, AlfonsoIl problema del significato nella logica di Pietro da Mantova,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9 (1974) 155–70.Google Scholar
Maierù, AlfonsoThe Sophism ‘Omnis propositio est vera vel falsa’ by Henry Hopton (Pseudo-Heytesbury’s De veritate et falsitate propositionis,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maioli, Bruno. Gilberto Porretano: dalla grammatica speculativa alla metafisica del concreto (Rome: Bulzoni Editore, 1979).Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Virpi. “The Franciscan Background of Early Modern Rights Discussion: Rights of Property and Subsistence,” in Kraye, J. and Saarinen, R. (eds.) Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2005) 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, Virpi. “Godfrey of Fontaine’s Criticism Concerning Franciscan Poverty and the Birth of Individual Natural Rights,” Picenum seraphicum 19 (2000): 69–85.Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Virpi. “The Rights of the Poor: An Argument against the Franciscans,” in Korpiola, M. (ed.) Nordic Perspectives on Medieval Canon Law (Helsinki: Matthias Calonius Society, 1999) 41–9.Google Scholar
Malcolm, John. “A Reconsideration of the Identity and Inherence Theories of the Copula,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979) 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallard, William. “John Wyclif and the Tradition of Biblical Authority,” Church History 30 (1961) 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malter, Henry. Saadia Gaon, his Life and Works (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1921; repr. New York: Hermon Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Manekin, Charles. “Conservative Tendencies in Gersonides’ Religious Philosophy,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 304–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manekin, Charles. (tr.). Medieval Jewish Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Mann, William E.The Best of All PossibleWorlds,” in MacDonald, S. (ed.) Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991) 250–77.Google Scholar
Mann, William E.Divine Simplicity,” Religious Studies 18 (1982) 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, William E.Ethics,” in Brower, J. and Guilfoy, K. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, William E.Inner-Life Ethics,” in Matthews, G. B. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998) 140–65.Google Scholar
Mannath, Joseph T.Harvey of Nedellec’s Proofs for the Existence of God: ‘De cognicione primi principii, qq. III–IV’,” Salesianum 31 (1969) 46–112.Google Scholar
Mantienne, Alain.Lanfranc: le fidèle conseiller de Guillaume le Conquérant (Condé-sur-Noireau: Corlet, 2006).Google Scholar
Maranesi, Pietro.Il IV libro della Summa Quaestionum di Pietro di Giovanni Olivi. Un’ipotesi di soluzione,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 95 (2002) 53–92.Google Scholar
Marcolino, Vénicio.Leben und Schrifftum des Augustinereremiten Johannes von Basel (†1392),” Augustiniana 53 (2003) 319–81.Google Scholar
Marcotte, Roxanne D.Preliminary Notes on the Life and Work of Abū al-ʿAbbās al-LawkarĪ (d. ca. 517/1123),” Anaquel de Estudios árabes 17 (2006) 133–57.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Alcuin, the Council of Frankfurt and the Beginnings of Medieval Philosophy,” in Berndt, R. (ed.) Das Frankfurter Konzil von 794: Kristallisationspunkt karolingischer Kultur (Mainz: Selbstverlag der Gesellschaft für Mittelrheinische Kirchengeschichte, 1997) II: 603–15.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Anselm Rewrites his Argument: Proslogion 2 and the Response to Gaunilo,” in Hamesse, J. and Weijers, O. (eds.) écriture et reéćriture des textes philosophiques médiévaux (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006) 347–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. Aristotelian Logic, Platonism and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. Boethius (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Carolingian Thought,” in McKitterick, R. (ed.) Carolingian Culture: Emulation and Innovation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984) 171–92.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Les Catégories au début du moyen âge,” in Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.) Les Catégories et leur histoire (Paris: Vrin, 2005) 223–43.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre: Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Gilbert of Poitiers,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 328–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Glosses and Commentaries on the Categories and De interpretatione before Abelard,” in Fried, J. (ed.) Dialektik und Rhetorik im früheren und hohen Mittelalter, Schriften des historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 27 (Munich: Historisches Kolleg, 1997) 21–49.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “John Scottus and Carolingian Theology: from the De praedestinatione, its Background and its Critics, to the Periphyseon,” in Gibson, M. T. and Nelson, J. L. (eds.) Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom, 2nd edn (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990) 303–25.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. Later Medieval Philosophy (1150–1350): An Introduction (London: Routledge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. “The Latin Tradition of Logic to 1100,” in Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook to the History of Logic, vol. II: Medieval and Renaissance Logic (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2008) 1–63.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, Before c. 1150 A.D.,” in Burnett, C. (ed.) Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions (London: Warburg Institute, 1993) 77–127.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. “A Note on the Porretani,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. The Philosophy of Peter Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. Le temps, la prescience et les futurs contingents de Boèce à Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Margoliouth, D. S.The Discussion Between Abu Bishr Matta and Abu Saʿid al-Sirafi on the Merits of Logic and Grammar,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1905) 79–129.Google Scholar
Markowski, Mieczyslaw. “Komentarz Jana Aurifabera z Erfurtu do Fizyki Arystotelesa (Johannes Aurifabers von Erfurt Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles in der Handschrift 1423 der Universitätsbibliothek in Leipzig),” Acta mediaevalia 12 (1999) 335–43.Google Scholar
Markus, Robert A.Saint Augustine’s Views on the ‘JustWar’,” in Sheils, W. J. (ed.) The Church and War (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983) 1–13.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. “Hoc autem etsi potest tollerari … Egidio Romano e Tommaso d’Aquino sulle passione dell’ anima,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 2 (1991) 281–315.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. “A Pragmatic Approach to Language in Modism,” in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1995) 169–83.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. “Retorica e motti di spirito. Una ‘quaestio’ inedita di Giovanni di Jandun,” in Magli, P., Manetti, G., and Violi, P. (eds.) Semiotica: storia, teoria, interpretazione (Milan: Bompiani, 1992) 23–41.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. “The Semantics of the Modistae,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1999) 83–104.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. La semiotica e linguaggio nella Scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330 (Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medioevo, 1994).Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Al-Ghazali,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 137–54.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Avicenna on Causal Priority,” in Morewedge, P. (ed.) Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism (Delmar: Caravan Books, 1981) 65–83.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Avicenna’s Chapter on Universals in the Isagoge of his Shifāʿ,” in Welch, A. T. and Cachia, P. (eds.) Islam: Past Influence and Present Challenge (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979) 34–56.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context,” The Monist 69 (1986) 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Ghazalian Causes and Intermediaries,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 115 (1995) 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.The Metaphysics of Efficient Causality in Avicenna (Ibn Sina),” in Marmura, M. (ed.) Islamic Theology and Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984) 172–87.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael and Rist., John M.Al-Kindi’s Discussion of Divine Existence and Oneness,” Mediaeval Studies 25 (1963) 338–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmursztejn, Elsa.L’autorité des maîtres: scolastique, normes et société au xiie siècle (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2007).Google Scholar
Maróth, Miklós.The Correspondence between Aristotle and Alexander the Great: An Anonymous Greek Novel in Letters in Arabic Translation (Piliscsaba: Avicenna Közel-Kelet Kutatások Intézete, 2006).Google Scholar
Marrone, Steven P.The Light of Thy Countenance: Science and Knowledge of God in the Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar
Marrone, Steven P.Matthew of Aquasparta, Henry of Ghent and Augustinian Epistemology after Bonaventure,” Franziskanische Studien 65 (1983) 252–90.Google Scholar
Marrone, Steven P.Truth and Scientific Knowledge in the Thought of Henry of Ghent (Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy, 1985).Google Scholar
Marrone, Steven P.William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste: New Ideas of Truth in the Early Thirteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrou, Henri I.Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique (Paris: Boccard, 1938–49).Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter.Parisian Psychology in the Mid-Fourteenth Century,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 50 (1983) 101–93.Google Scholar
Martel, Benoît.La psychologie de Gonsalve d’Espagne (Paris: Vrin, 1968).Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Abaelard on Modality: Some Possibilities and Some Puzzles,” in Buchheim, T., Kneepkens, C. H., and Lorenz, K. (eds.) Potentialität und Possibilität Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog 2001).Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Embarrassing Arguments and Surprising Conclusions in the Development of Theories of the Conditional in the Twelfth Century,” in Jolivet, J. and Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains: aux origines de la logica modernorum (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 377–401.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Formal Consequence in Scotus and Ockham: Towards an Account of Scotus’ Logic,” in Boulnois, O. et al. (eds.) Duns Scot à Paris 1302–2002 (Turnout: Brepols, 2005) 117–50.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Logic,” in Brower, J. and Guilfoy, K. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 158–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.The Logic of Negation in Boethius,” Phronesis 36 (1991) 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.The Logic of the Nominales, or, The Rise and Fall of Impossible Positio,” Vivarium 30 (1987) 110–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Obligations and Liars,” in Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.) Medieval Formal Logic: Consequences, Obligations, Insolubles (Dordrecht: Reidel, 2001) 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Self-Knowledge and Cognitive Ascent: Thomas Aquinas and Peter Olivi on the KK-Thesis,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007) 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.Something Amazing About the Peripatetic of Pallet: Abelard’s Development of Boethius’ Account of Conditional Propositions,” Argumentation I (1987) 420–36.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J.William’s Machine,” Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986) 564–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. F. J.On aMistake Commonly Made in Accounts of Sixteenth-Century Discussions of the Immortality of the Soul,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1995) 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, John H.The Eucharistic Treatise of John Quidort of Paris,” Viator 6 (1975) 214–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, John H.Inventing Sincerity, Refashioning Prudence: The Discovery of the Individual in Renaissance Europe,” American Historical Review 102 (1997) 1309–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mas i Solench, Josep Maria. Ramon de Penyafort (Barcelona: Rafael Dalmau, 2000).Google Scholar
Masai, François.Pléthon et le platonisme de Mistra (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1956).Google Scholar
Masai, François.Matteo d’Acquasparta: Francescano, filosofo, politico. Atti del xxix convegno storico internationale (Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 1993).Google Scholar
Matthaes, Curt.Der Salernitaner Arzt Urso aus der 2. Hålfte des 12. Jahrhunderts und seine beiden Schriften “De effectibus qualitatum” und “De effectibus medicinarum” (Leipzig: Noske, 1918).Google Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, rev. edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B.Augustine (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B. (ed.). The Augustinian Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B.Thought’s Ego in Augustine and Descartes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “The De quidditatibus entium of Dietrich of Freiberg and its Criticism of Thomistic Metaphysics,” Mediaeval Studies 18 (1956) 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “Francis of Meyronnes’ Defense of Epistemological Realism,” in Studia Mediaevalia et Mariologica in Honour of P. Carolo Balić (Rome: Pontificium Athenaeum “Antonianum”, 1971) 203–25; repr. in A. Maurer, Being and Knowing (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1990) 311–31.Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “Henry of Harclay’s Question on the Univocity of Being,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “John of Jandun and the Divine Causality,” Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955) 185–207; repr. in Being and Knowing (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990) 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “Ockham’s Razor and Chatton’s Anti-Razor,” Mediaeval Studies 46 (1984) 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. The Philosophy of William of Ockham in the Light of its Principles (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999).Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “The Role of Infinity in the Thought of Francis of Meyronnes,” Mediaeval Studies 33 (1971) 201–27; repr. in Being and Knowing (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1990) 333–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “St. Thomas and Eternal Truths,” in Being and Knowing: Studies in St. Thomas and Later Medieval Philosophers (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1990) 43–58.Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “St. Thomas and Historicity,” in Being and Knowing: Studies in St. Thomas and Later Medieval Philosophers (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1990) 95–116.Google Scholar
Mauro, V.La disputata de anima tra Vitale du Four e Pietro di Giovanni Olivi,” Studi Medievali 38 (1997) 89–139.Google Scholar
May, Gerhard.Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: Die Entstehung der Lehre von der Creatio ex nihilo (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, Pasquale.La dottrina dell’anima e della conoscenza in Matteo d’Acquasparta (Padua: Gregoriana, 1969).Google Scholar
Meersseman, Gilles-Gérard.Antonius de Carlenis O.P., Erzbischof von Amalfi,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 3 (1933) 81–131.Google Scholar
Meersseman, Gilles-Gérard.Geschichte des Albertismus (Paris: Haloua, 1933–5).Google Scholar
Meersseman, Gilles-Gérard.Les origines parisiennes de l’Albertisme Colonais,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 7 (1932) 121–42.Google Scholar
Meier, H. C.Macht und Wahnwitz der Begriffe: der Ketzer Roscellinus (Aalen: Spieth, 1974).Google Scholar
Meier, L.Wilhelm von Nottingham (†1336) einZeuge für die Entwicklung der distinctio formalis an der Universität Oxford,” in Rintelen, F. J. von (ed.) Philosophia Perennis: Abhandlungen zu ihrer Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (Regensburg: Habbel, 1930) 247–67.Google Scholar
Melamed, Abraham.The Philosopher King in Medieval and Renaissance Jewish Philosophical Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Melchert, Christopher.Ahmad ibn Hanbal (Oxford: Oneworld, 2006).Google Scholar
Meller, Bernhard.Studien zur Erkenntnislehre des Peter von Ailly (Freiburg: Herder, 1954).Google Scholar
Melloni, Alberto and Nicolaus.Innocenzo IV: La concezione e l’esperienza della cristianità come regimen unius personae (Genoa: Marietti, 1990).Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen.Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen.Al-FārābĪ’s Kitāb al-ḥurūf and his Analysis of the Senses of Being,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 18 (2008) 59–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensa i Valls, Jaume.Arnau de Vilanova, espiritual: guia bibliogràfica (Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans, 1994).Google Scholar
Menut, Albert D.A Provisional Bibliography of Oresme’s Writings,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Christia. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercken, H. P. F.The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentaries and their Influence (London: Duckworth, 1990) 407–43.Google Scholar
Merlan, Philip.Monopsychism, Mysticism, and Metaconsciousness (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesch, Barry. “Principles of Judaism in Maimonides and Joseph ibn Caspi,” in Reinharz, J. and Schwetschinski, D. (eds.) Mystics, Philosophers and Politicians (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1982) 85–98.Google Scholar
Meuthen, Erich. Nikolaus von Kues, 1401–1464. Skizze einer Biographie, 4th edn (Münster: Aschendorff, 1979).Google Scholar
Meuthen, Erich and Hallauer, Hermann (eds). Acta Cusana. Quellen zur Lebensgeschichte des Nikolaus von Kues (Hamburg: Meiner, 1976–).Google Scholar
Mews, Constant. Abelard and Heloise (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, Constant. “Logica in the Service of Philosophy: William of Champeaux and his Influence,” in Berndt, R. (ed.) Schrift, Schreiber, Schenker: Studien zur Abtei Sankt Viktor zu Paris und zu den Viktorinern (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2005) 61–101.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant. “Nominalism and Theology before Abaelard: New Light on Roscelin of Compiègne,” Vivarium 30 (1992) 4–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyendorff, John.A Study of Gregory Palamas, tr. Lawrence, G., 2nd edn (London: Faith Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Meyer, Gerbert and Zimmermann, Albert (eds.). Albertus Magnus – Doctor Universalis (Mainz: Matthias-Grüewald, 1980).Google Scholar
Meyer, Susan Suavé. Aristotle on Moral Responsibility: Character and Cause (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Michael, Emily. “John Wyclif on Body and Mind,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2003) 343–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. “A propos des premières summae confessorum,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 26 (1959) 264–306.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. “Die Psychologie bei Radulphus Ardens, einem Theologen des ausgehenden XII. Jahrunderts,” Münchener theologische Zeitschrift 9 (1958) 81–96.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. “Les puissances de l’âme chez Jean de la Rochelle,” Antonianum 24 (1949) 489–505.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. Sommes de casuistique et manuels de confession au moyen âge (Leuven: Nauwelaerts, 1962).Google Scholar
Michon, Cyrille. Nominalisme: la théorie de la signification de Guillaume d’Ockham (Paris: Vrin, 1994).Google Scholar
Michot, Jean. “La pandémie avicennienne,” Arabica 40 (1993) 287–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miethke, Jürgen. “Literaturbericht über Marsilius von Padua (1958–1992),” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 35 (1993) 150–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miethke, Jürgen. “Papst, Ortsbischof und Universität in den Pariser Theologenprozessen des 13. Jahrhunderts,” in Zimmermann, A. (ed.) Die Auseinandersetzungen an der Pariser Universität im XIII. Jahrhundert (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1976) 52–94.Google Scholar
Miethke, Jürgen. Ockhams Weg zur Sozialphilosophie (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migne, Jacques-Paul (ed.). Patrologiae cursus completus: series graeca (Paris, 1857–76).Google Scholar
Migne, Jacques-Paul (ed.). Patrologiae cursus completus: series latina (Paris, 1844–91).Google Scholar
Mikhail, Hanna. Politics and Revelation: Mawardi and After (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Millás Vallicrosa, José Maria. Las traducciones orientales en los manuscritos de la Biblioteca Catedral de Toledo (Madrid: Consejo superior de investigaciones cientificas, 1942) 285–312.Google Scholar
Miller, Barry. “Necessarily Terminating Causal Series,” Mind 91 (1982) 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. “The ‘Ars disserendi’ of Adam of Balsham ‘Parvipontanus’,” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 3 (1954) 116–69.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. “Dante’s Reading of Aristotle,” in Grayson, C. (ed.) The World of Dante (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980) 61–80.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. “Jacobus Veneticus Graecus, Canonist and Translator of Aristotle,” Traditio 8 (1952) 265–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. Opuscula: The Latin Aristotle (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1972).Google Scholar
Ministeri, Blasio. De vita et operibus Augustini de Ancona O.E.S.A. (1328) (Rome: Analecta Augustiniana, 1953).Google Scholar
Miquel, André. La géographie humaine du monde musulman jusqu’au milieu du 11e siecle (Paris: La Haye, 1975).Google Scholar
Moevs, Christian. The Metaphysics of Dante’s Comedy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möhle, Hannes. Formalitas und modus intrinsecus. Die Entwicklung der Scotischen Metaphysik bei Franciscus de Mayronis (Münster: Aschendorff, 2007).Google Scholar
Mohler, Ludwig. Kardinal Bessarion als Theologe, Humanist, und Staatsmann: Funde und Forschungen (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1923–42; repr. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1967).Google Scholar
Mohler, Ludwig. Mojsisch, Burkhard. Meister Eckhart: Analogy, Univocity and Unity, tr. Summerell, O. F. (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2001).Google Scholar
Molland, A. George. “An Examination of Bradwardine’s Geometry,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19 (1978) 113–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molland, A. George. “John Dumbleton and the Status of Geometrical Optics,” in Molland, A. G. (ed.) Mathematics and the Medieval Ancestry of Physics (Aldershot: Variorum, 1995).Google Scholar
Molland, A. George. “Nicole Oresme and Scientific Progress,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9 (1974) 206–20.Google Scholar
Mollat, Michel. “Hospitalité et assistance au début du XIIIe siècle,” in Flood, D. (ed.) Poverty in the Middle Ages (Werl: Coelde, 1975).Google Scholar
Mollat, Michel. Les pauvres au Moyen Age: étude sociale (Paris: Hachette, 1978).Google Scholar
Molteni, Paulo. Roberto Holcot O.P.: dottrina della grazia e della giustificazione con due questioni quodlibetali inedite (Pinerolo: Editrice Alzani, 1967).Google Scholar
Monagle, Clare. Christological Nihilism in the Twelfth Century: The Contested Reception of Peter Lombard’s Sententiae (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007).Google Scholar
Monahan, Arthur. “The Subject of Metaphysics for Peter of Auvergne,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 118–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monfasani, John. Byzantine Scholars in Renaissance Italy: Cardinal Bessarion and Other émigrés: Selected Essays (Aldershot: Variorum, 1995).Google Scholar
Monfasani, John. (ed.). Collectanea Trapezuntiana: Texts, Documents, and Bibliographies of George of Trebizond (Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1984).Google Scholar
Monfasani, John. George of Trebizond: A Biography and a Study of his Rhetoric and Logic (Leiden: Brill, 1976).Google Scholar
Monnot, Guy. “Les controverses théologiques dans l’œuvre de Shahrastani,” in Boulluec, A. Le (ed.) La controverse religieuse et ses formes (Paris: Cerf, 1995) 281–96.Google Scholar
Montada, Josef Puig. “Philosophy in Andalusia: Ibn Bājja and Ibn Ṭufayl,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 155–79.Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.Galileo and Avempace: The Dynamics of the Leaning Tower Experiment,” Journal for the History of Ideas 12 (1951) 163–93, 375–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.The Logic of William of Ockham (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1935).Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.A Quodlibetal Question of Robert Holcot, O.P. on the Problem of the Objects of Knowledge and of Belief,” Speculum 39 (1964), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.The Rise of Mechanism in 14th Century Natural Philosophy: Translations of Texts on the Causal and Mathematical Analysis of Motion by John Buridan (ca. 1300–1358) and John Dumbleton (fl. 1328–1340) (New York: Columbia University Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.William of Auvergne and his Treatise De anima,” in Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science, and Logic: Collected Papers, 1933–69 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975) 1–109.Google Scholar
Moonan, Lawrence. Divine Power: The Medieval Power Distinction up to its Adoption by Albert, Bonaventure, and Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moonan, Lawrence. “Impossibility and Peter Damian,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980) 146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Caroline. “The Authorial Role of Brother A. in the Composition of Angela of Foligno’s Revelations,” in Matter, A. and Coakley, J. (eds.) Creative Women in Medieval and Early Modern Italy: A Religious and Artistic Renaissance (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Mooney, Caroline. Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Philip. The Works of Peter of Poitiers, Master in Theology and Chancellor of Paris (1193–1205) (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Moore, R. I.The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance inWestern Europe, 950–1250, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Rebecca. Jews and Christians in the Life and Thought of Hugh of St. Victor (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Moore, W. L.Via Moderna,” in Strayer, J. R. (ed.) Dictionary of Middle Ages (New York: Scribner, 1989) XII: 406–9.Google Scholar
Moose, Ebrahim. Ghazali and the Poetics of Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena: A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraux, Paul. D’Aristote à Bessarion: trois exposés sur l’histoire et la transmission de l’Aristotélisme grec (Quebec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1970).Google Scholar
Moreno-Riano, Gerson. The World of Marsilius of Padua (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006).Google Scholar
Moreno Rodríguez, Felipe. La lucha de Ramón Llull contra el averroismo entre 1309 y 1311 (Madrid: Universidad Computense de Madrid, 1982).Google Scholar
Morenzoni, Franco and Tilliette, Jean-Yves (eds.). Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne (+1249) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morewedge, Parviz. “The Analysis of ‘Substance’ in Tusi’s Logic and in the Ibn Sinian Tradition,” in Hourani, G. (ed.) Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Mormando, Franco. The Preacher’s Demons: Bernardino of Siena and the Social Underworld of Early Renaissance Italy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Morris, Colin. The Discovery of the Individual 1050–1200 (New York: Harper and Row, 1972).Google Scholar
Mostert, Marco. The Political Theology of Abbo of Fleury: A Study of the Ideas about Society and Law of the Tenth-Century Monastic Reform Movement (Hilversum: Verloren, 1987).Google Scholar
Mourin, Louis. Jean Gerson prédicateur français (Bruges: De Tempel, 1952).Google Scholar
Muckle, J. T.Greek Works Translated into Latin before 1350,” Mediaeval Studies 4 (1942) 33–42; 5 (1943) 102–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muckle, J. T.Isaac Israeli’s Definition of Truth,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 8 (1933) 5–8.Google Scholar
Muckle, J. T.Utrum Theologia sit scientia. A Quodlibetal Question of Robert Holcot, O.P.,” Mediaeval Studies 20 (1958) 127–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudarris RaḍawĪ, Muh.ammad T.Aḥwal wa ātār-i Abū Jaʾfar Muḥammad al-ṬūsĪ (Tehran: Bunyādi Farhang-i Irān, 1975).Google Scholar
Mulchahey, Marian Michèle. “First the Bow is Bent in Study …”: Dominican Education before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1998).Google Scholar
Muldoon, James. Popes, Lawyers, and Infidels: The Church and the Non-Christian World, 1250–1550 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Muller, Catherine M.Marguerite Porete et Marguerite d’Oingt de l’autre côté du miroir (New York: Lang, 1999).Google Scholar
Müller, Jean P.La date de la lecture sur les Sentences de Jean Quidort,” Angelicum 36 (1959) 129–62.Google Scholar
Müller, Sigrid. “The Ethics of John Capreolus and the Nominales,” Verbum: Analecta Neolatina 6 (2004) 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Sigrid. Handeln in einer kontingenten Welt: zu Begriff und Bedeutung der rechten Vernunft (recta ratio) bei Wilhelm von Ockham (Tübingen: Francke, 2000).Google Scholar
Müller, Sigrid. “Sprache,Wirklichkeit und Allmacht Gottes: das Bild der via moderna bei Johannes Capreolus (1380–1444) und seine Bedeutung für die Schulbildung im 15. Jahrhundert,” in Aertsen, J. and Pickavé, M. (eds.) Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004) 157–72.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. “Huguccio of Pisa: Canonist, Bishop, and Grammarian?,” Viator 22 (1991) 121–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz García, Angel. “Albert of Saxony, Bibliography,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 32 (1990) 161–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John. “From Social to Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning,” in Murdoch, J. and Sylla, E. (eds.) The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975) 271–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John. “Henry of Harclay and the Infinite,” in Maierù, A. and Bagliani, A. Paravicini (eds.) Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1981) 219–61.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John. “Infinity and Continuity,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 564–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John. “Mathesis in philosophiam scholasticam introducta: The Rise and Development of the Application of Mathematics in Fourteenth-Century Philosophy and Theology,” Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1969) 215–54.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John. “Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons,” in Cosman, M. P. and Chandler, B. (eds.) Machaut’s World: Science and Art in the Fourteenth Century (New York: New York Academy of Science, 1978) 51–86.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John. “Thomas Bradwardine:Mathematics and Continuity in the Fourteenth Century,” in Grant, E. and Murdoch, J. (eds.) Mathematics and its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984) 103–37.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John and Sylla, Edith. “The Science of Motion,” in Lindberg, D. (ed.) Science in the Middle Ages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978) 206–65.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John and Synan, Edward. “Two Questions on the Continuum: Walter Chatton (?), O.F.M. and Adam Wodeham, O.F.M.,” Franciscan Studies 25 (1966) 212–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Claudia Eisen. “Aquinas on our Responsibility for our Emotions,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999) 163–205.Google Scholar
Murray, Alexander. “Confession before 1215,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 3 (1993) 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Alexander. Reason and Society in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Murray, Alexander. Suicide in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998–2002).Google Scholar
Murray, John Courtney. “Remarks on the Moral Problem of War,” Theological Studies 20 (1959) 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscat, P.Guillelmi de Ware quaestio inedita de unitate Dei,” Antonianum 2 (1927) 335–50.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, Karma. “Conceptions of Justice in War: FromGrotius to Modern Times,” in Sorabji, R. and Rodin, D. (eds.) The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006) 44–60.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven and Rudavsky, T. M. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Nagl, Alfred. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik (Leipzig: Teubner, 1890).Google Scholar
Nagy, Albino. Die philosophischen Abhandlungen des Jaʿqub ben Ishaq al-Kindi (Münster: Aschendorff, 1897).Google Scholar
Nallino, Carlo A.Tracce di opere greche giunte agli arabi per trafila pehlevica,” in Arnold, T. W. and Nicholson, R. A. (eds.) A Volume of Oriental Studies Presented to E.G. Browne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922) 345–63; repr. in M. Nallino and C. A. Nallino (eds.) Raccolta di scritti editi e inediti (Rome: Istituto per l’Oriente, 1948) VI: 285–303.Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. Dante e la cultura medievale, ed. Mazantini, P. (Rome: Laterza, 1985).Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. Saggi di filosofia dantesca (Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1967).Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. Saggi sull’Aristotelismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI (Florence: Sansone, 1958).Google Scholar
Nash, Peter W.The Accidentality of Esse According to Giles of Rome,” Gregorianum 38 (1957) 103–15.Google Scholar
Nash, Peter W.Giles of Rome on Boethius’s ‘Diversum est esse et id quod est’,” Mediaeval Studies 20 (1950) 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines: Conceptions of Nature and Methods Used for its Study by the Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʿ, al-BĪrūnĪ, and Ibn Sʿnā, rev. edn (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein and Leaman, Oliver (eds.). History of Islamic Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein and Mehdi, Aminrazavi (eds.). An Anthology of Philosophy in Persia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Nassar, Nassif. La pensée réaliste d’Ibn Khaldūn (Paris: Presses universitaire de France, 1967).Google Scholar
,National Conference of Catholic Bishops. The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and our Response (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1983).
Nederman, Cary J.Bracton on Kingship Revisited,” History of Political Thought 5 (1984) 61–77.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J.Community and Consent: The Secular Political Theory of Marsiglio of Padua’s Defensor Pacis (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995).Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J.John of Salisbury (Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005).Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J.Kings, Peers and Parliament: Virtue and Corulership in Walter Burley’s Commentarius in VIII Libros Politicorum Aristotelis,” Albion 24 (1992) 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J.Political Thought in Early Fourteenth-Century England: Treatises by Walter de Milemete, William of Pagula, and William of Ockham (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002).Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J.The Royal Will and the Baronial Bridle: The Place of the Addicio de cartis in Bractonian Political Thought,” History of Political Thought 9 (1988) 415–29.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. and Neville, Cynthia J.. “The Origins of the Speculum regis Edwardi III of William of Pagula,” Studi Medievali, 3rd ser. 38 (1997) 317–29.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. and Sullivan, Mary E.. “Reading Aristotle through Rome: Republicanism and History in Ptolemy of Lucca’s De regimine principum,” European Journal of Political Theory 7 (2008) 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Paul. “Duhem’s Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002) 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netter, Thomas and Shirley, Walter W. (eds.). Fasciculi zizaniorum magistri Johannis Wyclif cum tritico (Rolls Series 5) (London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts, 1858).Google Scholar
Netton, Ian R.Al-Farabi and his School (New York: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Netton, Ian R.Muslin Neoplatonists: An Introduction to the Thought of the Brethren of Purity, Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʿ (London: Allen and Unwin, 1982).Google Scholar
Newhauser, Richard. The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhauser, Richard. (ed.). In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and their Culture in the Middle Ages (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005).Google Scholar
Newhauser, Richard. (ed.). The Seven Deadly Sins: From Communities to Individuals (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhauser, Richard. The Treatise on Vices and Virtues in Latin and the Vernacular (Turnhout: Brepols, 1993).Google Scholar
Richard, Newhauser and Bejczy, István. Towards a Revised Incipitarium: Corrections, Supplements, Deletions, and Additions to Update Morton Bloomfield et al., Incipits of LatinWorks on the Virtues and Vices (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007).Google Scholar
Newman, Barbara. God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barbara. “Hildegard and her Hagiographers” in Mooney, C. (ed.) Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999) 16–34.Google Scholar
Newman, Barbara. “Hildegard of Bingen: Visions and Validation,” Church History 54 (1985) 163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barbara. “La Mystique Courtoise: Thirteenth-Century Beguines and the Art of Love,” in From Virile Woman to Woman Christ: Studies in Medieval Religion and Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995) 137–67.Google Scholar
Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom, St. Hildegard’s Theology of the Feminine (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Newman, Barbara. (ed.). Voice of the Living Light: Hildegard of Bingen and her World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Newman, William R.Atoms and Alchemy: Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William R.New Light on the Identity of Geber,” Sudhoffs Archiv 69 (1985) 76–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicol, Donald. “Byzantine Political Thought,” in Burns, J. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 51–82.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.The Debate between Peter Auriol and Thomas Wylton on Theology and Virtue,” Vivarium 38 (2000) 35–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.Dictates of Faith versus Dictates of Reason: Peter Auriole on Divine Power, Creation, and Human Rationality,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 7 (1996) 213–41.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.The Intelligibility of Faith and the Nature of Theology: Peter Auriole’s Theological Programme,” Studia Theologica 53 (1999) 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.Peter Auriol’s Way with Words: The Genesis of Peter Auriol’s Commentaries on Peter Lombard’s First and Fourth Books of the Sentences,” in Evans, G. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 149–219.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.The Quodlibet of Peter Auriol,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 267–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O.Theology and Philosophy in the Twelfth Century: A Study of Gilbert Porreta’s Thinking and the Theological Expositions of the Doctrine of the Incarnation during the Period 1130–1180 (Leiden: Brill, 1982).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O., Noone, Timothy, and Trifogli, Cecilia. “Thomas Wylton’s Question on the Formal Distinction as Applied to the Divine,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14 (2003) 330–88.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge O. and Trifogli, Cecilia. “Questions on the Beatific Vision by Thomas Wylton and Sibert de Beka,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 17 (2006) 511–84.Google Scholar
Noonan, John. Contraception: A History of its Treatment by the Catholic Theologians and Canonists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Noonan, John. “Gratian Slept Here: The Changing Identity of the Father of the Systematic Study of Canon Law,” Traditio 35 (1979) 145–72.Google Scholar
Noonan, John. The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Noonan, John. “Who was Rolandus?,” in Kuttner, S. et al. (eds.) Law, Church and Society: Essays in Honor of Stephan Kuttner (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977) 21–48.Google Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Alnwick on the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Formal Distinction,” Franciscan Studies 53 (1993) 231–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Evidence for the Use of Adam of Buckfield’s Writings at Paris,” Mediaeval Studies 54 (1992) 308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “The Franciscans and Epistemology: Reflections on the Roles of Bonaventure and Scotus,” in Houser, R. E. (ed.) Medieval Masters: Essays in Memory of Msgr. E.A. Synan, Thomistic Papers VII (Houston, TX: Center for Thomistic Studies, 1999) 63–90.Google Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Richard Rufus of Cornwall and the Authorship of the Scriptum super metaphysicam,” Franciscan Studies 49 (1989) 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Richard Rufus on Creation, Divine Immutability, and Future Contingency in the Scriptum super Metaphysicam,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 4 (1993) 1–23.Google Scholar
Noone, Timothy. “Roger Bacon and Richard Rufus on Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Search for the Ground of Disagreement,” Vivarium 25 (1997) 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noone, Timothy and Long, R. James. “Fishacre and Rufus on the Metaphysics of Light,” in Hamesse, J. (ed.), Roma, magister mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offerts au Père L.E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts médiévales, 1998) I: 517–48.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.Buridan’s Ontology,” in Bogen, J. and McGuire, J. E. (eds.) How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.Duns Scotus’s Modal Theory,” in Williams, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 129–60.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.The Necessity in Deduction: Cartesian Inference and its Medieval Background,” Synthese 96 (1993) 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.Picking and Choosing: Anselm and Ockham on Choice,” Vivarium 36 (1998) 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.Walter Burley on Continuity,” in Kretzmann, N. (ed.) Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982) 258–69.Google Scholar
North, John. “Natural Philosophy in Late Medieval Oxford,” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992) 76–95.Google Scholar
Nouzille, Phillippe and Boulnois, Olivier. Expérience de Dieu et théologie monastique au XIIe siècle (Paris: Cerf, 1999).Google Scholar
Novaes, Catarina Dutihl. “Buridan’s consequentia: Consequence and Inference within a Tokenbased Semantics,” History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2005) 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, Catarina Dutihl. “Ralph Strode’s obligationes: The Return of Consistency and the Epistemic Turn,” Vivarium 44 (2006) 338–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, David. The Theology of Nahmanides Systematically Presented (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Novotný, Václav, and Kybal, Vlastimil. M. Jan Hus, Zivot a Ucení (Prague: Nákladem Jana Laichtera, 1919–31) 5 vols.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Late-Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980).Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. Kingship: The Politics of Enchantment (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Francis. The Political Thought of Pierre d’Ailly: The Voluntarist Tradition (NewHaven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A.Archbishop Thomas Bradwardine (Utrecht: Kemink and Zoon, 1957).Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A.Facientibus quod in se est Deus non denegat gratiam:Robert Holcot, OP and the Beginnings of Luther’s Theology,” Harvard Theological Review 55 (1962) 317–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. (ed.). Gregor von Rimini: Werk und Wirkung bis zur Reformation (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A.The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A.Werden und Wertung der Reformation: Vom Wegestreit zum Glaubenskampf (Tübingen: Mohr, 1977).Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. and Weisheipl, James A.. “The Sermo epinicius ascribed to Thomas Bradwardine,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 25 (1958) 295–329.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Andrew. “Duns Scotus’ Teaching on the Distinction between Essence and Existence,” New Scholasticism 38 (1964) 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrist, Barbara (ed.). Abbon de Fleury: philosophie, science et comput autour de l’an mil (Paris: Centre d’histoire des sciences et des philosophies arabes et médiévales, 2004).Google Scholar
O’Carroll, Mary. A Thirteenth-Century Preacher’s Handbook: Studies in MS Laud misc. 511 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1997).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, , Reginald, J.. “The Syncategoremata of William of Sherwood,” Mediaeval Studies 3 (1941) 46–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, Oliver. The Just War Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehler, Klaus. Antike Philosophie und byzantinisches Mittelalter (Munich: Beck, 1969).Google Scholar
Oliger, Livarius. “Servasanto da Faenza e il suo ‘Liber de virtutibus et vitiis’,” in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle (Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1924) I: 148–89.Google Scholar
Olivieri, Luigi. Pietro d’Abano e il pensiero neolatino (Padua: Antenore, 1988).Google Scholar
Olsen, Glenn. “John of Salisbury’s Humanism,” in Leonardi, C. (ed.) Gli unamesimi medievali (Florence: SISMEL, 1988).Google Scholar
O’Malley, John. “Medieval Preaching,” in Amos, T. L. et al. (eds.) De ore Domini: Preacher and Word in the Middle Ages (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 1989) 1–13.Google Scholar
Omar, Saleh Beshara. Ibn al-Haytham’s Optics: A Study of the Origins of Experimental Science (Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1977).Google Scholar
O’Meara, John J.Eriugena (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuma, Yasuaki. A Normative Approach to War: Peace, War and Justice in Hugo Grotius (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Origo, Iris. The World of San Bernardino (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1962).Google Scholar
Orlandi, Stefano. Antonino, arcivescovo di Firenze, dottore della chiesa: studi (Florence: Il Rosario, 1959).Google Scholar
Ormsby, Eric. Ghazali (Oxford: Oneworld, 2007).Google Scholar
Ormsby, Eric. Theodicy in Islamic Thought: The Dispute over al-Ghazâlî’s “Best of All PossibleWorlds” (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Kenan. “Alexander of Hales: Precursor and Promoter of Franciscan Theology,” in The History of Franciscan Theology, St Bonaventure (New York: Franciscan Institute, 1994) 1–38.Google Scholar
Ostlender, Heinrich (ed.). Sententiae florianenses (Bonn: Hanstein, 1929).Google Scholar
Ott, Ludwig. Untersuchungen zur theologischen Briefliteratur der Frühscholastik: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Viktorinerkreises (Münster: Aschendorff, 1937).Google Scholar
Ottaviano, Carmelo. Guiglielmo d’Auxerre, d. 1231: la vita, le opere, il pensiero (Rome: L’Universale tipografia poliglotta, 1929).Google Scholar
Otte, James. “Alfredus Anglicus and the Reception of Aristotle,” Proceedings of the Patristic, Mediaeval and Renaissance Conference 15 (1990) 127–39.Google Scholar
Otte, James. “The Life and Writings of Alfredus Anglicus,” Viator 3 (1972) 275–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otten, Willemien. The Anthropology of Johannes Scottus Eriugena (Leiden: Brill, 1991).Google Scholar
Ottman, Jennifer and Wood, Rega. “Walter Burley: His Life and Works,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, Per-Gunnar. Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy: A Study of Commentaries on Galen’s Tegni, ca. 1300–1450 (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1984).Google Scholar
Ouy, Gilbert. “Discovering Gerson the Humanist: Fifty Years of Serendipity,” in McGuire, B. P. (ed.) A Companion to Jean Gerson (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 79–132.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L.Logic and Metaphysics in Some Early Works of Aristotle,” in Owen, G. and Ingemar, D. (eds.) Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century: Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum (Gothenburg: Elanders, 1960) 163–90.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L.Tithenai ta phainomena,” in Barnes, J. et al. (eds) Articles on Aristotle 1: Science (London: Duckworth, 1975) 113–26.Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven. Homo spiritualis: A Comparative Study of the Anthropology of Johannes Tauler, Jean Gerson and Martin Luther (1509–16) (Leiden: Brill, 1969).Google Scholar
Palazzo, Alessandro. “Ulrich of Strasbourg and Denys the Carthusian,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 46 (2004) 61–113; 48 (2006) 163–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Aquinas on Intellectual Representation,” in Perler, D. (ed.) Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 185–201.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Le discours intérieur de Platon à Guilaume d’Ockham (Paris: Seuil, 1999).Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “From Mental Word to Mental Language,” Philosophical Topics 20 (1992) 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Les mots, les concepts et les choses. Le sémantique deGuillaume d’Occam et le nominalisme d’aujourd’hui (Montréal: Bellarmin, 1991).Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Ockham on Concepts (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Semantics and Mental Language,” in Spade, P. V. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude and Perini-Santos, Ernesto. “Guillaume d’Ockham et la suppositio materialis,” Vivarium 42 (2004) 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panella, Emilio. “Dal bene comune al bene del comune: I trattati politici di Remigio dei Girolami nella Firenze dei bianchi-neri,” in Politica e vita religiosa a Firenze tra ʾ300 e ʾ500 (Pistoia: Centro riviste della provincia romana, 1985) 1–198.Google Scholar
Panella, Emilio. “Remigiana: Note biografiche e fiologiche,” Memorie Domenicane 13 (1982) 366–421.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia. “Stoic Psychotherapy in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Petrarch’s De remedies,” in Osler, M. J. (ed.) Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Jean B.Théodore II Lascaris, empereur de Nicée (Paris: Picard, 1908).Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “The Organic Soul,” in Schmitt, C. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 464–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Massimo (ed.). “Il linguaggio delle proportiones nella distinctio prima di Giovanni di Mirecourt,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 39 (1984) 657–86.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence, “The Traditional Square of Opposition,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/o win2006/entries/square/.Google Scholar
Paschetto, Eugenia. Pietro d’Abano, medico e filosofo (Florence: Nuovedizioni E. Vallecchi, 1984).Google Scholar
Pascoe, Louis B.Jean Gerson: Principles of Church Reform (Leiden: Brill, 1973).Google Scholar
Pasiecznik, Marcellus. “John de Bassolis, OFM,” Franciscan Studies 13 (1953) 59–77; 14 (1954), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Aquinas and the Content Fallacy,” Modern Schoolman 75 (1998) 293–314. (tr.). Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. III: Mind and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Form, Substance, and Mechanism,” Philosophical Review 113 (2004) 31–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Henry of Ghent and the Twilight of Divine Illumination,” Review of Metaphysics 49 (1995) 49–75.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Olivi on Human Freedom,” in Boureau, A. and Piron, S. (eds.) Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298): pensée scolastique, dissidence spirituelle et société (Paris: Vrin, 1999) 15–25.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Olivi on the Metaphysics of Soul,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997) 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Sensible Qualities: The Case of Sound,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38.1 (2000): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa theologiae Ia 75–89 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “William Heytesbury on Knowledge: Epistemology without Necessary and Sufficient Conditions,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995) 347–66.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert and Shields, Christopher, The Philosophy of Aquinas (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2004).Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. L’anthropologie de Gérard d’Abbeville: étude préliminaire et édition critique de plusieurs Questions quodlibétiques concernant le sujet, avec l’édition complète du De cogitationibus (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. “Gilles de Rome, O.E.S.A. (ca 1243–1316) et la distinction réelle de l’essence et de l’existence,” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 23 (1953) 80–116.Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. “Jan van Hulshout (1405–1475) Vlaams wijsgeer en theoloog van de Universiteit te Keulen,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 38 (1976) 104–38.Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. Pour l’histoire du sens agent: la controverse entre Barthélemy de Bruges et Jean de Jandun, ses antécédents et son évolution (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. “La structure de l’être fini selon Bernard d’Auvergne, O.P.,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 24 (1962) 668–737.Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan. “Een vijftiende-eeuws commentaar op het De divinis nominibus van de Pseudo-Dionysius: een onbekend werk van Johannes Hulshout van Mechelen (1405–1475). Een studie over de bronnen van dit werk,” in Handelingen van de Koninklijke Kring voor Oudheidkunde, Letteren en Kunst van Mechelen, 98e Boekdeel, (Mechelen: The Kring, 1995) 53–64.Google Scholar
Paulmier-Foucart, Monique and Duchenne, Marie-Christine. Vincent de Beauvais et le Grand miroir du monde (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulmier-Foucart, Monique, Lusignan, Serge, and Nadeau, Alain (eds.). Vincent de Beauvais: intentions et rećeptions d’une œuvre encyclopédique au Moyen âge (Paris: Vrin, 1990).Google Scholar
Paulus, Jean. “Les disputes d’Henri de Gand et de Gilles de Rome sur la distinction de l’essence et l’existence,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 13 (1940–2) 323–58.Google Scholar
Paulus, Jean. Henri de Gand. Essai sur les tendances de sa métaphysique (Paris: Vrin, 1938).Google Scholar
Payen, Jean Charles. “La penitence dans le contexte culturel des XIIe et XIIIe siècles: des doctrines contritionnistes aux pénitentiels vernaculaires,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 61 (1977) 399–428.Google Scholar
Payer, Pierre. The Bridling of Desire: Views of Sex in the Later Middle Ages (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Gordon. “Cognitive Intuition of Singulars Revisited (Matthew of Aquasparta versus B.J. Lonergan),” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 346–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peden, A. M.Abbo of Fleury and Ramsey: Commentary on the Calculus of Victorius of Aquitaine (Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pedersen, Olaf. The First Universities: Studium Generale and the Origins of University Education in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pelster, Franz. “Die anonyme Verteidigungsschrift der Lehre Gilberts von Poitiers im Cod. Vat. 561 und ihr Verfasser Canonicus Adhemar von Saint-Ruf in Valence (um 1180),” Studia mediaevalia in honorem Admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin (Bruges: De Tempel, 1948) 113–46.Google Scholar
Pelster, Franz. “Heinrich von Harclay, Kanzler von Oxford, und seine Quaestionen,” in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle (Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1924) I: 307–56.Google Scholar
Pelster, Franz. “Literaturgeschichtliches zur Pariser theol. Schule aus den Jahren 1230–1256,” Scholastik 5 (1930) 46–78.Google Scholar
Pelzer, A.Les 51 articles de Guillaume Occam censurés, en Avignon, en 1326,” Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 18 (1922) 246–7.Google Scholar
Pelzer, A.Prosper de Reggio Emilia des Ermites de Saint-Augustin et le manuscrit latin 1086 de la Bibliothèque Vaticane,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 30 (1928) 316–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. “The Consilia of Baldus de Ubaldis,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 56 (1988) 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perarnau, Josep (ed.). Actes de la I Trobada Internacional d’Estudis sobre Arnau de Vilanova (Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans, 1995).Google Scholar
Percan, Josip. Teologia come “scienza pratica” secondo Giovanni di Reading (Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1986).Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. “Changes in the Approach to Language,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 808–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Crathorn on Mental Language,” in Marmo, C. (ed.) Vestigia, Imagines, Verba. Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIth–XIVth Century) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997) 337–54.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Essentialism and Direct Realism: Some Late Medieval Perspectives,” Topoi 19 (2000) 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Intentionality and Action: Medieval Discussions on the Cognitive Capacities of Animals,” in Pacheco, M. C. and Meirinhos, J. F. (eds.) Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006) I: 73–98.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Peter Aureol vs. Hervaeus Natalis on Intentionality: A Text Edition with Introductory Remarks,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 61 (1994) 227–62.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Seeing and Judging: Ockham and Wodeham on Sensory Cognition,” in Knuuttila, S. and Kärkkäinen, P. (eds.) Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008) 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2002).Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “Things in the Mind: Fourteenth-Century Controversies over ‘Intelligible Species’,” Vivarium 34 (1996) 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). “What Am I Thinking About? John Duns Scotus and Peter Aureol on Intentional Objects,” Vivarium 32 (1994) 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). Zweifel und Gewissheit: skeptische Debatten im Mittelalter (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2006).Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik and Rudolph, Ulrich. Logik und Theologie: das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter (Leiden: Brill, 2005).Google Scholar
Perler, DominikOccasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im Europäischen Denken (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2000).Google Scholar
Perreiah, A. R.Insolubilia in the Logica parva of Paul of Venice,” Medioevo 4 (1978) 145–72.Google Scholar
Perreiah, A. R.Paul of Venice: A Bibliographical Guide (Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986).Google Scholar
Pessin, Sarah. “The Influence of Islamic Thought on Maimonides,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2005 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/maimonides-islamic/.Google Scholar
Pessin, Sarah. “Jewish Neoplatonism: Being above Being and Divine Emanation in Solomon Ibn Gabirol and Isaac Israeli,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, F. E.Aristoteles Arabus: The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus (Leiden: Brill, 1968).Google Scholar
Peters, J. R. T. M.God’s Created Speech: A Study in the Speculative Theology of the MuʿtazilĪ QāḍĪ l-quḍāt Abū l-Ḥasan ʿAbd al-Jabbār ibn Aḥmad al-HamaḍānĪ (Leiden: Brill, 1976).Google Scholar
Petroff, Elizabeth. Body and Soul: Essays on Medieval Women and Mysticism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeremy. Providence in the Book of Job: The Search for God’sMind (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Franz (ed.). Deutsche Mystiker des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts (Leipzig: Göschen, 1845–57; repr. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1962).Google Scholar
Phelps, Mary. “The Theory of Seminal Reasons in James of Viterbo,” Augustiniana 30 (1980) 271–83.Google Scholar
Phyrigos, Antones. Dalla controversia palamitica alla polemica esicastica, con un’edizione critica delle Epistole greche di Barlaam (Rome: Antonianum, 2005).Google Scholar
Picavet, François. Roscelin philosophe et theologien d’après la légende et d’après l’histoire; sa place dans l’histoire générale et comparée des philosophies medievales (Paris: Alcan, 1911).Google Scholar
Piché, David (ed.). La condamnation parisienne de 1277 (Paris: Vrin, 1999).Google Scholar
Piché, DavidLe problème des universaux à la Faculté des Arts de Paris entre 1230 et 1260 (Paris: Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar
Pickavé, Martin. Heinrich von Gent über Metaphysik als erste Wissenschaft: Studien zu einem Metaphysikentwurf aus dem letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilný, Josepha. Jérôme de Prague: un orateur progressiste du Moyen Age (Geneva: Perret-Gentil, 1974).Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Die Aristoteles-Quaestionen des Magister Nicolaus von Amsterdam,” Classica et Mediaevalia 25 (1964) 244–62.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter (Münster: Aschendorff, 1967).Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter: ein überblick (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1972).Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Magister Abstractionum,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 18 (1976) 1–4.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. Medieval Semantics, Selected Studies on Medieval Logic and Grammar, ed. Ebbesen, S. (London: Variorum, 1984).Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “A New MS of the Questions on the Posteriora analytica Attributed to Petrus de Alvernia,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 10 (1973) 48–62.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “A Note on Some Theoretical Concepts of Logic and Grammar,” Revue internationale de philosophie 21 (1975) 286–96.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Radulphus Brito on Universals,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 35 (1980) 60–123.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Speculative Grammar,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 254–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Walter Burleigh on the Meaning of Proposition,” Classica et Mediaevalia 28 (1969) 394–404.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan and Ebbesen, Sten. “Thirteenth-Century Notes on William of Sherwood’s ‘Treatise on Properties of Terms’: An Edition of Anonymi dubitationes et notabilia circa Guilelmi de Shyreswode introductionum logicalium Tractatum V from MS Worcester Cath. Q.13,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 47 (1984) 103–41.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “La loi naturelle et la société: la doctrine politico-théologique d’Ibn Zurʿa,” in Heyd, U. (ed.) Studies in Islamic History and Civilization (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1961) 154–90.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “Les précurseurs musulmans de la theorie d l’impetus,” Archeion (Archivio di storia della scienza) 21 (1938) 298–306.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. Scholasticism after Thomas Aquinas and the Teachings of Hasdai Crescas and his Predecessors (Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1967).Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. Studies in Abuʾl-Barakat al-Baghdadi: Physics and Metaphysics, in The Collected Works of Shlomo Pines, vol. I (Leiden: Brill, 1979).Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo and Yovel, Yirmiyahu (eds.). Maimonides and Philosophy (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1985).Google Scholar
Pingree, David. The Thousands of Abu Mashar (London: Warburg Institute, 1968).Google Scholar
Pini, Giorgio. “Being and Creation in Giles of Rome,” in Aertsen, J. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 390–403.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Categories in the Late Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “Giles of Rome,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 233–86.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “Una lettura scotista della Metafisica di Aristotele: l’expositio in libros Metaphysicorum di Antonio Andrea,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 2 (1991) 529–86.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “Scotistic Aristotelianism: Antonius Andreas’ Expositio and Quaestiones on the Metaphysics,” in Sileo, L. (ed.) Via Scoti: Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti (Rome: Edizioni Antonianum, 1995) I: 375–89.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “Univocity in Scotus’ Quaestiones super Metaphysicam: The Solution to a Riddle,” Medioevo 30 (2005) 69–110.Google Scholar
Pinziani, Roberto. The Logical Grammar of Abelard (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piron, Sylvain. “Franciscan Quodlibeta in Southern Studia and at Paris, 1280–1300,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 403–38.Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain. Nicolas Oresme: Violence, langage et raison politique (Florence: European University Institute, 1997).Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain. “Les œuvres perdues d’Olivi: essai de reconstitution,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 91 (1998) 357–94.Google Scholar
Pironet, Fabienne. “Sophismata,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2006 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/sophismata/.Google Scholar
Pironet, Fabienne. “‘The Sophismata asinina’ of William Heytesbury,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 128–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pironet, Fabienne. The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar from Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography (1977–1994) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997).Google Scholar
Pirzio, Paola. “Le prospettive filosofiche del trattato di Enrico di Langenstein (1325–1397) ‘De habitudine causarum’,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 24 (1969) 363–73.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Does God Have a Nature? (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Platti, Emilio. Yaḥyā Ibn ʿAdĪ, théologien chrétien et philosophe arabe: sa théologie de l’Incarnation (Leuven: Departement Orientalistiek, 1983).Google Scholar
Platzeck, Erhard-Wolfram. Raimund Lull. Sein Leben – Seine Werke. Die Grundlagen seines Denkens (Prinzipienlehre) (Rome: Editiones Franciscanae, 1962–64).Google Scholar
Plevano, Roberto. “Richard Rufus of Cornwall and Geoffrey of Aspall: Two Questions on the Instant of Change,” Medioevo 19 (1993) 167–232.Google Scholar
Plotnik, Kenneth. Hervaeus Natalis OP and the Controversies over the Real Presence and Transubstantiation (Munich: Schöningh, 1970).Google Scholar
Pluta, Olaf. “Die Diskussion der Frage nach der Unsterblichkeit bei Nikolaus Oresme und Peter von Ailly,” Studia Mediewistyczne 27 (1990) 115–30.Google Scholar
Pluta, Olaf. “Materialism in the Philosophy of Mind. Nicholas of Amsterdam’s Quaestiones De anima,” in Bakker, P. J. J. M. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (eds.) Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007) 109–26.Google Scholar
Pluta, Olaf. (ed.). Nicholas of Amsterdam: A Dutch Master of Arts in Fifteenth-Century Germany (Amsterdam: Grüner 2008).Google Scholar
Pobst, Phyllis. “Visitation of Religious and Clergy by Archbishop Eudes Rigaud of Rouen,” in Burman, T. et al. (eds.) Religion, Text, and Society in Medieval Spain and Northern Europe. Essays in Honor of J.N. Hillgarth (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2002) 223–49.Google Scholar
Podskalsky, Gerhard. Theologie und Philosophie in Byzanz (Munich: Beck, 1977).Google Scholar
Poonawala, Ismail. Biobibliography of IsmāʿĪlĪ Literature (Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1977).Google Scholar
Pope, Stephen J. (ed.). The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pope, Stephen J.Overview of the Ethics of Thomas Aquinas,” in Pope, S. J. (ed.) The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002) 30–53.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle, rev. edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Porebski, Stanislaw. “La question de Bernard Lombardi concernant la différence réelle entre l’essence et l’existence,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 17 (1973) 157–85.Google Scholar
Porro, Pasquale. “An Historiographical Image of Henry of Ghent,” in Vanhamel, W. (ed.) Henry of Ghent. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Occasion of the 700th Anniversary of his Death (1293) (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996) 373–403.Google Scholar
Porro, Pasquale. “Possibilità e Esse essentiae in Enrico di Gand,” in Vanhamel, W. (ed.) Henry of Ghent. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Occasion of the 700th Anniversary of his Death (1293) (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996) 211–53.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005).Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. “Responsibility, Passion, and Sin: A Reassessment of Abelard’s Ethics,” Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2000) 367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Gaines. Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State 1100–1322 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potestà, Gian Luca. Storia ed escatologia in Ubertino da Casale (Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1980).Google Scholar
Pounds, Norman. An Economic History of Medieval Europe, 2nd edn (London: Longman, 1994).Google Scholar
Pourjavady, Reza and Schmidtke, Sabine. A Jewish Philosopher of Baghdad (Leiden: Brill, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powicke, F. M.Stephen Langton, Being the Ford Lectures Delivered in the University of Oxford in Hilary term 1927 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928; repr. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1965).Google Scholar
Pozzi, Lorenzo. La coerenza logica nella teoria medioevale delle obbligazioni (con l’edizione del trattato “Obligationes” di Guglielmo Buser) (Parma: Zara, 1990).Google Scholar
Pozzi, Lorenzo. Le consequentiae nella logica medievale (Padua: Liviana Editrice, 1978).Google Scholar
Prentice, Robert. “Univocity and Analogy According to Scotus’s Super libros Elenchorum Aristotelis,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 35 (1968) 39–64.Google Scholar
Prezioso, Faustino A.L’attività del soggetto pensente nella gnoseologia di Matteo d’Acquasparta e di Ruggiero Marston,” Antonianum 25 (1950) 259–326.Google Scholar
Prezioso, Faustino A.L’evoluzione del volontarismo da Duns Scoto a Guglielmo Alnwick (Naples: Libreria scientifica editrice, 1964).Google Scholar
Principe, Walter. The Theology of the Hypostatic Union in the Early Thirteenth Century (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1963–75).Google Scholar
Prior, A. N.The Possibly-True and the Possible,” Mind 78 (1969) 481–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priori, Domenico and Balena, Massimo (eds.). Atti del II Convegno Internazionale su Francesco d’Appignano (Appignano del Tronto: Centro studi Francesco d’Appignano, 2004).Google Scholar
Pulcini, Theodore. Exegesis as Polemical Discourse: Ibn Hazm on Jewish and Christian Scriptures (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier. “La connaissance de soi au moyen âge: Vital du Four,” Collectanea Franciscana 60 (1990) 507–37.Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier. La connaissance de soi au XIIIe siècle. De Matthieu d’Aquasparta à Thierry de Freiberg (Paris: Vrin, 1991).Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier. Figures franciscaines, de Bonaventure à Duns Scot (Paris: Cerf, 1997).Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier. “Les idées divines dans la censure: le cas Olivi (1248–1298),” Revue Thomiste 103 (2003) 411–34.Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier. Insolente liberté: controverses et condamnations au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Cerf, 1995).Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier and Imbach, Ruedi. Profession, philosophe: Siger de Brabant (Paris: Cerf, 1997).Google Scholar
Putnam, C.Ulrich of Strasbourg and the Aristotelian Causes,” in Ryan, J. K. (ed.) Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1961) I: 139–59.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. “On Negative Theology,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997) 407–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quentin, Albrecht. Naturkenntness und Naturanschauungen bei Wilhelm von Auvergne (Hildescheim: Gertenberg, 1976).Google Scholar
Quillet, Jeannine (ed.). Autour de Nicole Oresme (Paris: Vrin, 1990).Google Scholar
Quillet, JeannineLa philosophie politique de Marsile de Padoue (Paris: Vrin, 1970).Google Scholar
Quinn, John. The Historical Constitution of St. Bonventure’s Philosophy (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1973).Google Scholar
Quinto, Riccardo. “High of St.-Cher’s Use of Stephen Langton,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Reitzels, 1999) 281–300.Google Scholar
Raciti, Gaetano. “L’autore del De spiritu et anima,” Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 53 (1961) 385–401.Google Scholar
Raciti, Gaetano. “Isaac de l’étoile,” in Viller, M., Raciti, G., and Solignac, A. (eds.) Dictionnaire de spiritualité (Paris: Beauchesne, 1971) VII: 2011–38.Google Scholar
Radding, Charles. The Origins of Medieval Jurisprudence: Pavia and Bologna, 850–1150 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Raedts, Peter. Richard Rufus of Cornwall and the Tradition of Oxford Theology (Oxford: Oxford Historical Monographs, 1987).Google Scholar
Raine, James. Historiae Dunelmensis scriptores tres: Gaufridus de Coldingham, Robertus de Graystanes, et Willielmus de Chambre (London: J.B. Nichols and Son, 1839).Google Scholar
Ramsey, Paul. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility (New York: Scribner, 1968).Google Scholar
Rand, E. K.Johannes Scottus (Munich: Beck, 1906).Google Scholar
Ranft, Patricia. The Theology of Work: Peter Damian and the Medieval Religious Renewal Movement (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashdall, Hastings. The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, rev. edn by Powicke, F. M. and Emden, A. B. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi. Géométrie et dioptrique au Xe siècle: Ibn Sahl, al-QūhĪ et Ibn al-Haytham (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1993).Google Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi. “Al-KindĪ’s Commentary on Archimedes’s ‘The Measurement of the Circle’,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 3 (1993) 7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi. Les mathématiques infinitésimales du IXe au XIe siècle (London: Al-Furq-an Islamic Heritage Foundation, 1993–2006).Google Scholar
Rauschenbach, Sina. Josef Albo: Jüdische Philosophie und christliche Kontroverstheologie in der Frühen Neuzeit (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Ravitzky, Aviezer. “Samuel Ibn Tibbon and the Esoteric Character of The Guide of the Perplexed,” Association of Jewish Studies Review 6 (1981) 87–123.Google Scholar
Raynaud de Lage, Guy. Alain de Lille, poète du XIIe siècle (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1951).Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. “How Is Material Supposition Possible?,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999) 1–20.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. “The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine,” Vivarium 40 (2002) 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Stephen. “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2006 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/medievalterms/.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. (ed.). Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Stephen. “Thomas of Cleves and Collective Supposition,” Vivarium 29 (1991) 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Marjorie. The Influence of Prophecy in the Later Middle Ages: A Study in Joachimism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1969; repr. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M., Syse, Henrik, and Begby, Endre (eds.). The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings (Indianapolis, IN: Wiley-Blackwell, 2006).Google Scholar
Reilly, James. “Thomas of York on the Efficacy of Secondary Causes,” Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953) 225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reina, Maria. “Comprehensio veritatis: una questione di Marsilio di Inghen sulla metafisica,” Textes et études du Moyen Age 1 (1994) 283–335.Google Scholar
Reina, Maria. Hoc Hic et Nunc: Buridano, Marsilio di Inghen e la conoscenza del singolare (Florence: Olschki, 2002).Google Scholar
Reisman, David C.Al-FārābĪ and the Philosophical Curriculum,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 52–71.Google Scholar
Reina, Maria. The Making of the Avicennan Tradition: The Transmission, Contents, and Structure of Ibn SĪnā’s al-Mubāḥathāt (The Discussions) (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Reisman, David C. and al-RahĪm, Ahmed H. (eds.). Before and after Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Remnant, Peter. “Peter Damian: Could God Change the Past?,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978) 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renan, Ernest. Averroès et l’averroïsme (œuvres complètes, vol. III) (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1949).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. The Development of Arabic Logic (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. “A New Approach to Aristotle’s Apodeictic Syllogisms,” in Rescher, N. (ed.) Studies in Modality (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974) 3–15.Google Scholar
Resnick, Irven M.Divine Power and Possibility in St. Peter Damian’s De divina omnipotentia (Leiden: Brill, 1992).Google Scholar
Resnick, Irven M.Odo of Tournai, the Phoenix, and the Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1997) 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, Irven M. and Kitchell, Kenneth. Albert the Great: A Selectively Annotated Bibliography (1900–2000) (Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Reuter, Timothy. Wortkonkordanz zum Decretum Gratiani (Munich: Monumenta Germaniae Historica, 1990).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Gabriel Said. “The Rise and Fall of Qadi ʿAbd al-Jabbar,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37 (2005) 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip. Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods (Leiden: Brill, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip. “Properties, Causality, and Epistemic Optimism in Thomas Aquinas,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 68 (2001) 270–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribémont, Bernard. Les origines des encyclopédies médiévales d’Isidore de Séville aux Carolingiens (Paris: Champion, 2001).Google Scholar
Richards, Earl Jeffrey (ed.). Reinterpreting Christine de Pizan (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Riché, Pierre. Abbon de Fleury: un moine savant et combatif (vers 950–1004) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riché, Pierre. écoles et enseignement dans le Haut Moyen âge: fin du Ve siècle – milieu du XIe siècle (Paris: Picard, 1989).Google Scholar
Riché, Pierre. Education and Culture in the Barbarian West, Sixth through Eighth Centuries, tr. Contreni, J. J. (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Richir, Luc. Marguerite Porete: une âme au travail de l’Un (Brussels: Ousia, 2002).Google Scholar
Richter, Gerhard. Theodoros Dukas Laskaris, der natürliche Zusammenhang: ein Zeugnis vom Stand der byzantinischen Philosophie in der Mitte des 13. Jahrhundert (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1989).Google Scholar
Richter, Vladimir. “Handschriftliches zu Crathorn,” Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 94 (1972) 445–9.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard. Studien zur Spätscholastik I: Marsilius von Inghen und die okkamistische Schule in Deutschland (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1921).Google Scholar
Rius y Serra, José (ed.). San Raimundo de Penyafort: Diplomatario (Barcelona: López Robert, 1954).Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H.Mysticism and Philosophy: Ibn ʿArabĪ and Mullā Ṣadrā,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 224–46.Google Scholar
Roberts, Phyllis B.Stephanus de Lingua Tonante: Studies on the Sermons of Stephen Langton (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1968).Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W.A Note on the Classical Origins of ‘Circumstances’ in the Medieval Confessional,” Studies in Philology 43 (1946) 6–14.Google Scholar
Robiglio, Andrea. L’impossibile volere. Tommaso d’Aquino, i tomisti e la volontà (Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 2002).Google Scholar
Robiglio, Andrea. “‘Neapolitan Gold’: A Note on William of Tocco and Peter of Ireland,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 44 (2002) 107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James T.Hasdai Crescas and anti-Aristotelianism,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James T.The Ibn Tibbon Family: A Dynasty of Translators in Medieval Provence,” in Harris, J. (ed.) Beʾerot Yitzhak: Studies in Memory of Isadore Twersky (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005) 193–224.Google Scholar
Robinson, James T.Samuel Ibn Tibbon’s Commentary on Ecclesiastes and the Philosopher’s Prooemium,” in Twersky, I. and Harris, J. (eds.) Studies in Medieval Jewish History and Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000) III: 83–146.Google Scholar
Robson, John. Wyclif and the Oxford Schools (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Rocca, Gregory. “The Distinction between res significata and modus significandi in Aquinas’ Theological Epistemology,” The Thomist 55 (1990) 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochais, Henri. “Ipsa philosophia Christus,” Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951) 244–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rode, Christian. Franciscus de Prato: Facetten seiner Philosophie im Blick auf Hervaeus Natalis und Wilhelm Ockham (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2004).Google Scholar
Roensch, Frederick. Early Thomistic School (Dubuque, IA: Priory Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Roest, Bert. A History of Franciscan Education (c. 1210–1517) (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Rohls, Jan. Wilhelm von Auvergne und der mittelalterliche Aristotelismus (Munich: Kaiser, 1980).Google Scholar
Rohmer, Jean. “La théorie de l’abstraction dans l’école franciscaine de Alexandre de Hales à Jean Peckham,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 3 (1928) 105–84.Google Scholar
Roland-Gosselin, M.-D.Le “De ente et essentia” de s. Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin, 1926; repr. 1948).Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich. “Die Kontroverse zwischen Bartholomaeus von Brügge und Radulphus Brito über die Frage ‘Utrum genus possit salvari in unica specie’,” in Köhler, T. W. (ed.) Sapientiae procerum amore: mélanges médiévistes offerts à Dom Jean-Pierre Müller (Rome: Editrice Anselmiana, 1974) 323–42.Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich. Die Modi significandi des Martinus de Dacia (Copenhagen: Frost-Hansen, 1952).Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich. “Zwei Quaestionum des Radulphus Brito über das Significatum generis,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 24 (1978) 55–64.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W.Ibn Rushd: A Catalogue of Editions and Scholarly Writings from 1821 onwards,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 30 (1988) 153–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W.Peter Lombard (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W.The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. (ed.). Saadya Studies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1943; repr. New York: Arno Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. (ed.). “The Theory of the Power-State: Ibn Khaldun’s Study of Civilization,” in Rosenthal, E. (ed.) Political Thought in Medieval Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. “Abu Zayd al-Balkhi on Politics,” in Bosworth, C. E. et al. (eds.) The Islamic World, from Classical to Modern Times: Essays in Honor of Bernard Lewis (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989) 287–301.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. Aḥmad b. aṭ-Ṭayyib as-SarakhsĪ (New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society, 1943).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. Das Fortleben der Antike im Islam (Zürich: Artemis Verlag, 1965).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. Greek Philosophy in the Arab World (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1990).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. “On the Knowledge of Plato’s Philosophy in the Islamic World,” Islamic Culture 14 (1940) 387–422; 15 (1941) 396–8.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. “State and Religion according to Abū l-Ḥasan al-ʿāmirĪ,” Islamic Quarterly 3 (1956) 42–52.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Abélard et les grammairiens: sur la définition du verbe et la notion d’inhérence,” in Lardet, P. (ed.) La tradition vive: Mélanges d’histoire des textes en l’honneur de Louis Holtz (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003) 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Abélard et les grammairiens: sur le verbe substantif et la prédication,” Vivarium 41 (2003) 176–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Les acceptions du terme ‘substantia’ chez Pierre Helie,” in Jolivet, J. and Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 299–324.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “The Glosulae in Priscianum and its Tradition,” in McLelland, N. and Linn, A. (eds.) Papers in Memory of Vivien Law (Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 2004) 81–99.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “La grammaire dans le ‘Guide de l’étudiant’,” in Lafleur, C. and Carrier, J. (eds.) L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. Autour du “Guide de l’étudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997) 255–79.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. La grammaire spéculative des Modistes (Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1983).Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Modisme, pré-modisme, proto-modisme, vers une définition modulaire,” in Ebbesen, S. and Friedman, R. L. (eds.) Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen: Royal Academy, 1999) 45–81.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “O Magister …: Grammaticalité et intelligibilité selon un sophisme du XIIIe siècle,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 56 (1988) 1–102.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. La parole comme acte: sur la grammaire et la sémantique au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 1994).Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. La parole efficace: signe, rituel, sacré (Paris: Seuil, 2004).Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Priscien, Boèce, les Glosulae in Priscianum, Abélard: les enjeux des discussions autour de la notion de consignification,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 25 (2003) 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Res significata et modus significandi: Les implications d’une distinction médiévale,” in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1995) 135–68.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Roger Bacon: Grammar,” in Hackett, J. (ed.) Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1996 (Leiden: Brill, 1997) 67–102.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Les sophismes grammaticaux au XIIIe siècle,” Medioevo 17 (1991) 175–230.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène and Ebbesen, Sten. “Petrus de Alvernia + Boethius de Dacia: Syllogizantem ponendum est terminos,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 75 (2004) 161–218.Google Scholar
Ross, James F.Philosophical Theory (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969).Google Scholar
Rossi, Pietro. “Robert Grosseteste and the Object of Scientific Knowledge,” in McEvoy, J. (ed.) Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives on his Thought and Scholarship (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995) 53–76.Google Scholar
Rossini, M.Quod coexsistit exsistit: Alessandro di Alessandria e i futuri contingenti,” in Sileo, L. (ed.) Via Scoti: methodologica ad mentem Ioannis Duns Scoti (Rome: Edizioni Antonianum, 1995) 1049–63.Google Scholar
Rossmann, Heribert. Die Hierarchie der Welt: Gestalt und System des Franz von Meyronnes OFM mit besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner Schöpfungslehre (Werl: Coelde, 1972).Google Scholar
Roth, Bartholomaeus. Franz von Mayronis, O.F.M. Sein Leben, seine Werke, seine Lehre vom Formalunterschied in Gott (Werl-in-Westfalen: Franziskus-Druckerei, 1936).Google Scholar
Roueché, Mossman. “Byzantine Philosophical Texts of the Seventh Century,” Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 23 (1974) 61–76.Google Scholar
Roueché, Mossman. “Did Medical Students Study Philosophy in Alexandria?,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 43 (1999) 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Richard and Rouse, Mary. Preachers, Florilegia and Sermons: Studies on the “Manipulus florum” of Thomas of Ireland (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1979).Google Scholar
Rubert Candáu, José Maria. La filosofia del siglo XIV a través de G. Rubió (Madrid: Ediciones Verdad y Vida, 1952).Google Scholar
Rubio, Mercedes. Aquinas and Maimonides on the Possibility of the Knowledge of God: An Examination of the Quaestio de attributis (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Rucquoi, A.Gundisalvus ou Dominicus Gundisalvi,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 41 (1999) 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudavsky, T. M.Conflicting Motifs in Ibn Gabirol’s Discussion of Matter and Evil,” New Scholasticism 52 (1978) 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudavsky, T. M.Gersonides,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/gersonides.Google Scholar
Rudavsky, T. M.The Theory of Time in Maimonides and Crescas,” Maimonidean Studies 1 (1990) 143–62.Google Scholar
Rudavsky, T. M.Time Matters: Time, Creation and Cosmology in Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rudnick, Ulrich. Das System des Johannes Scottus Eriugena: eine theologisch-philosophische Studie zu seinem Werk (Frankfurt: Lang, 1990).Google Scholar
Rudolph, Conrad. First, I Find the Center Point: Reading the Text of Hugh of Saint Victor’s The Mystic Ark (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 2004).Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. Al-MāturĪdĪ und die sunnitische Theologie in Samurkand (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Ruello, Francis. “Les fondements de la liberté humaine selon Jacques de Viterbe O.E.S.A. Disputatio 1a de Quolibet, q. VII (1293),” Augustiniana 24 (1974) 283–347; 25 (1975) 114–42.Google Scholar
Ruello, Francis. “Paul de Venise théologien ‘averroiste’?,” in Jolivet, J. (ed.) Multiple Averroès (Paris: Vrin, 1978) 257–72.Google Scholar
Ruello, Francis. La pensée de Jean de Ripa OFM (XIVe siècle), immensité divine et connaissance théologique (Fribourg: éditions universitaires, 1990).Google Scholar
Ruello, Francis. “Le projet théologique de Jean de Ripa O.F.M.,” Traditio 49 (1994) 127–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffing, Janet (ed.). Mysticism and Social Transformation (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rupp, Teresa. “Damnation, Individual, and Community in Remigio dei Girolami’s De bono communi,” History of Political Thought 21 (2000) 217–36.Google Scholar
Rusconi, Roberto. “De la prédication à la confession: transmission et contrôle de modèles de comportement au XIIIe siècle,” in Faire croire: modalités de la diffusion et de la réception des messages religieux du XIIe au XVe siècle (Rome: école française de Rome, 1981) 67–85.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy (London: Allen and Unwin, 1946).Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H.The Historical Perspective of the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter: The View of One Medievalist,” in Reid, C. Jr. (ed.) Peace in a Nuclear Age: The Bishops’ Pastoral Letter in Perspective (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1986) 86–97.Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H.The Just War in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H.Love and Hate in Warfare: The Contribution of Saint Augustine,” Nottingham Medieval Studies 31 (1987) 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Frederick H.Persuading the Donatists: Augustine’s Coercion by Words,” in Klingshirn, W. and Vessey, M. (eds.) The Limits of Ancient Christianity. Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999) 115–30.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman. “Prochoros Cydones and the Fourteenth-Century Understanding of Orthodoxy,” in Louth, A. and Casiday, A. (eds.) Byzantine Orthodoxies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006) 75–92.Google Scholar
Ryan, Christopher J.Man’s Free Will in the Works of Siger of Brabant,” Mediaeval Studies 45 (1983) 155–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, John K. and Bonansea, Bernardino M.. “John Duns Scotus, 1265–1965,” in Ryan, J. K. and Bonansea, B. M. (eds.) Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. III (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Ryan, Magnus. “Bartolus of Sassoferrato and Free Cities,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 10 (2000) 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saak, Eric. High Way to Heaven: The Augustinian Platform between Reform and Reformation, 1292–1524 (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Google Scholar
Saarinen, Risto. Weakness of the Will in Medieval Thought from Augustine to Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Remigio. Guariniana, ed. Sancipriano, M. (Genoa: Tipografia del R. Istituto Sordo-Muti, 1891, 1896; repr. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1964).Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Form in Ibn al-Haytham’s Theory of Vision,” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Isalmischen Wissenschaften 5 (1980) 115–40.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Kalām Atomism as an Alternative Philosophy to Hellenizing falsafa,” in Montgomery, J. (ed.) Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy: From the Many to the One: Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank (Leuven: Peeters, 2006) 199–272.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Optics, Astronomy and Logic: Studies in Arabic Science and Philosophy (Aldershot: Variorum, 1994).Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Psychology versus Mathematics: Ptolemy and Alhazen on the Moon Illusion,” in Grant, E. and Murdoch, J. (eds.) Mathematics and its Applications in Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) 217–47.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Thābit ibn Qurra on the Infinite and Other Puzzles: Edition and Translation of his Discussions with Ibn Usayyid,” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften 11 (1997) 1–33.Google Scholar
Saco Alarçón, César. “Nicolás de Ockham OFM († c. 1320): Vida y obras,” Antonianum 53 (1978) 493–573.Google Scholar
Saʿdi, Lutfi M.A Bio-Bibliographical Study of Hunayn ibn Ishaq al-Ibadi,” Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine 2 (1934) 409–46.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D.Nouveau liens objectifs entre le pseudo-Denys et Proclus,” in Recherches sur le Néoplatonisme après Plotin (Paris: Vrin, 1990) 227–48.Google Scholar
Saint Pierre, J. A.The Theological Thought of William of Auxerre: An Introductory Bibliography,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 33 (1966) 147–55.Google Scholar
Salleras i Carolà, Marcel. “Bibliografia lulliana (1974–1984),” Randa 19 (1986) 153–98.Google Scholar
Salman, Dominique. “Algazel et les latins,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 10 (1936) 103–27.Google Scholar
Salman, H. D.Jean de la Rochelle et l’averroïsme latin,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 16 (1947–8) 133–42.Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan. Reference and Essence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Samir, Khalil and Nielsen, Jørgen S.. Christian Arabic Apologetics during the Abbasid Period, 750–1258 (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Norbert. “Causation and Choice in the Philosophy of ibn Daud,” in The Solomon Goldman Lectures, vol. II (Chicago: Spertus College, 1979).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Norbert. “Gersonides’ Account of God’s Knowledge of Particulars,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (1972) 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Cristóbal-Sebastián, Antonio. Controversias acerca de la voluntad desde 1270 a 1300: estudio histórico-doctrinal (Madrid: Editorial y librería co., 1958).Google Scholar
Sanford, Eva Matthews. “Honorius, Presbyter and Scholasticus,” Speculum 23 (1948) 397–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santi, Francesco. Arnau de Vilanova: L’obra espiritual (Valencia: Disputacio provincial de Valencia, 1986).Google Scholar
Santos-Noya, Manuel. Die Sünden und Gnadenlehre des Gregors von Rimini (Frankfurt: Lang, 1990).Google Scholar
Sarnowsky, Jürgen. Die aristotelisch-scholastische Theorie der Bewegung: Studien zum Kommentar Alberts von Sachsen zur Physik des Aristoteles (Münster: Aschendorff, 1989).Google Scholar
Sayers, Jane. Innocent III: Leader of Europe, 1198–1216 (London: Longman, 1994).Google Scholar
Sbaraglia, Giovanni Giacinto (ed.). Bullarium Franciscanum Romanorum Pontificum: Constitutiones, epistolas, ac diplomata (Rome, 1759–68; repr. SantaMaria degli Angeli: Edizioni Porziuncola, 1983).Google Scholar
Sbath, Paul. Vingt traités philosophiques et apologétiques d’auteurs arabes chrétiens du IXe au XIVe siècle (Cairo: Friedrich, 1929).Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Carmelite Quodlibeta,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 493–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Early Carmelites Between Giants: Questions on Future Contingents by Gerard of Bologna and Guy Terrena,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 70 (2003) 139–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Francis of Marchia’s Virtus derelicta and the Context of its Development,” Vivarium 44 (2006) 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Landulphus Caracciolo and a Sequax on Divine Foreknowledge,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 66 (1999) 299–343.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Landulph Caracciolo and Gerard Odonis on Predestination: Opposite Attitudes toward Scotus and Auriol,” Wissenschaft und Weisheit 65 (2002) 62–81.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Non aliter novit facienda quam facta: Gerard Odonis’s Questions on Divine Foreknowledge,” in Bakker, P. J. J. M. (ed.) Chemins de la pensée médiévale (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) 351–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Oxford Franciscans after Ockham: Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham,” in Evans, G. R. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: Current Research (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 359–77.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Parisian Commentaries from Peter Auriol to Gregory of Rimini, and the Problem of Predestination,” in Evans, G. R. (ed.) Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: Current Research (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 221–65.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Peter of Candia and the Prelude to the Quarrel at Louvain,” Epitirida of the Cyprus Research Centre 24 (1998) 87–124.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Peter Thomae’s Question on Divine Foreknowledge from his Sentences Commentary,” Franciscan Studies 61 (2003) 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Questions on Future Contingents by Michael of Massa, OESA,” Augustiniana 48 (1998) 165–229.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “The Quodlibeta of Peter of Auvergne,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 81–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “The Sentences Commentary of Gerard Odonis, OFM,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 46 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “The Sentences Commentary of Paul of Perugia, O.Carm., with an Edition of his Question on Divine Foreknowledge,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 72 (2005) 54–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris. Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 2006–7).Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. Theology at Paris 1316–1345: Peter Auriol and the Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris and Courtenay, William J.. “Augustinian Quodlibeta after Giles of Rome,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, Chris and Friedman, Russell L.. “Trinitarian Theology and Philosophical Issues III: Oxford 1312–1329: Walsingham, Graystanes, Fitzralph, and Rodington,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 74 (2003) 39–88.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Trinitarian Theology and Philosophical Issues IV: English Theology ca. 1300: William of Ware and Richard of Bromwich,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 75 (2004) 121–60.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris. “Trinitarian Theology and Philosophical Issues V: Oxford Dominicans: William of Macclesfield and Hugh of Lawton,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 76 (2005) 31–44.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris, Friedman, Russell L., and Balcoyiannopoulou, Irene. “Peter of Palude and the Parisian Reaction to Durand of St. Pourcain on Future Contingents,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 71 (2001) 183–300.Google Scholar
Schabel, Chris and Rossini, Marco. “Time and Eternity among the Early Scotists. Texts on Future Contingents by Alexander of Alexandria, Radulphus Brito, and Hugh of Novocastro,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16 (2005) 237–338.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, corrected edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Schamp, Jacques. Photios, historien des lettres: la bibliothèque et ses notices biographiques (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1987).Google Scholar
Scheben, H. C.Prediger und Generalprediger im Dominikanorden des 13. Jahrhunderts,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 21 (1961) 112–41.Google Scholar
Schepers, Heinrich. “Holkot contra dicta Crathorn: I. Quellenkritik und biographische Auswertung der Bakkalareatsschriften zweier Oxforder Dominikaner des XIV. Jahrhunderts,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 77 (1970) 320–54.Google Scholar
Schepers, Heinrich. “Holkot contra dicta Crathorn: II. Das ‘significatum per propositionem’. Aufbau und Kritik einer nominalistischen Theorie über den Gegenstand des Wissens,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 79 (1972) 106–36.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad. Radical Cartesians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaus, Michael. “Die Gotteslehre des Augustinus Triumphus nach seinem Sentenzenkommentar,” in Aus des Geisteswelt des Mittelalters (Münster: Aschendorff, 1935) 929–53.Google Scholar
Schmaus, Michael. “Guglielmi de Alnwick, O.F.M., doctrina de medio quo Deus cognoscit futura contingentia,” Bogoslovni vestnik 12 (1932) 201–25.Google Scholar
Schmaus, Michael. “Guillelmi de Nottingham, O.F.M., doctrina de aeternitate mundi,” Antonianum 7 (1932) 139–66.Google Scholar
Schmaus, Michael. “Neue Mitteilungen zum Sentenzenkommentar Wilhelms von Nottingham,” Franziskanische Studien 19 (1932) 195–223.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, Sabine. “Creeds,” in McAuliffe, J. D. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of the Qurʿān (Leiden: Brill, 2001–6).Google Scholar
Schmidtke, Sabine. The Theology of al-ʿAllāma al-ḤillĪ (d. 726/1325) (Berlin: Schwarz, 1991).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles. Cicero Scepticus. A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972).Google Scholar
Schmitt, F. S.Des Petrus von Aquila Compendium supra librum sententiarum aufgefunden,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médievale 17 (1950) 267–82.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Amy. “17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2006 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ sum2006/entries/emotions-17th18th.Google Scholar
Schmoll, Polykarp. Die Busslehre der Frühscholastik: eine dogmengeschichte Untersuchung (Munich: Lentner, 1909).Google Scholar
Schmugge, Ludwig. Johannes von Jandun (1285/89–1328): Untersuchungen zur Biographie und Sozialtheorie eines lateinischen Averroisten (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1966).Google Scholar
Schneider, Notker. Die Kosmologie des Franciscus de Marchia: Texte, Quellen, und Untersuchungen zur Naturphilosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts (Leiden: Brill, 1991).Google Scholar
Schneider, Richard. Die Trinitätslehre in den Quodlibeta und Quaestiones disputatae des Johannes von Neapel OP (†1336) (Munich: Schöningh, 1972).Google Scholar
Schneyer, Johannes Baptist. Geschichte der katholischen Predigt (Freiburg: Seelsorge, 1969).Google Scholar
Schöck, Cornelia. “Aussagenquantifizierung und -modalisierung in der frühen islamischen Theologie,” in Perler, D. und Rudolph, U. (eds.) Logik und Theologie (Leiden: Brill, 2005) 19–43.Google Scholar
Schöck, Cornelia. Koranexegese, Grammatik und Logik: zum Verhältnis von arabischer und aristotelischer Urteils-, Konsequenz- und Schlusslehre (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Schöllgen, Werner. Das Problem der Willensfreiheit bei Heinrich von Gent und Herveus Natalis (Dusseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann, 1927; repr. 1975).Google Scholar
Schönberger, Rolf. Relation als Vergleich: die Relationstheorie des Johannes Buridan im Kontext seines Denken und der Scholastik (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Schönberger, Rolf and Kible, Brigitte. Repertorium edierter Texte des Mittelalters (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1994).Google Scholar
Schork, R. Joseph and McCall, John. “A Lament on the Death of John of Legnano,” Studies in the Renaissance 19 (1972) 180–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrörs, Heinrich. Hinkmar, Erzbischof von Reims: sein Leben und seine Schriften (Freiburg: Herder, 1884).Google Scholar
Schramm, Matthias. Ibn al-Haythams Weg zur Physik (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963).Google Scholar
Schrimpf, Gangolf. Das Werk des Johannes Scottus Eriugena im Rahmen des Wissenscahftsverständnisses seiner Zeit: eine Hinführung zu Periphyseon (Münster: Aschendorff, 1982).Google Scholar
Schütz, C.Deus absconditus, Deus manifestus: die Lehre Hugos von St. Viktor über die Offenbarung Gottes (Rome: Herder, 1967).Google Scholar
Schütz, Werner. Geschichte der christliche Predigt (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1972).Google Scholar
Schwertner, Thomas M.Saint Raymond of Pennafort of the Order of Friars Preacher (Milwaukee, WI: Bruce, 1935).Google Scholar
Schweyen, Renate. Guarino Veronese: Philosophie und humanistische Pädagogik (Munich: Fink, 1973).Google Scholar
Scott, Karen. “‘This is why I have put you among your neighbors’;: St. Bernard’s and St. Catherine’s Understanding of the Love of God and Neighbor,” in Maffei, D. and Nardi, P. (eds.) Atti del Simposio Internazionale Cateriniano-Bernardiniano (Siena: Accademia senese degli intronati, 1982) 279–94.Google Scholar
Scott, T. K.Nicholas of Autrecourt, Buridan, and Ockhamism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1971) 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, Edgar. “The Power of Physical Bodies According to Thomas of York,” Sciences ecclésiastiques 14 (1962) 109–34.Google Scholar
Seeskin, Kenneth (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Maimonides (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeskin, KennethMaimonides on the Origin of the World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeskin, KennethSanctity and Silence: The Religious Significance of Maimonides’ Negative Theology,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2002) 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeskin, KennethSearching for a Distant God: The Legacy of Maimonides (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Segoloni, Danilo (ed.). Bartolo da Sassoferrato: studi e documenti per il VI centenario (Milan: Giuffrè, 1962).Google Scholar
Sela, Shlomo. Abraham Ibn Ezra and the Rise of Medieval Hebrew Science (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Sela, Shlomo and Freudenthal, Gad. “Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Scholarly Writings: A Chronological Listing,” Aleph 6 (2006) 13–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senko, Wladyslaw. “Les opinions d’Hervé Nédellec au sujet de l’essence et l’existence,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 10 (1961) 59–74.Google Scholar
Senko, Wladyslaw. “Tomasza Wiltona Quaestio disputata de anima intellectiva,” Studia Mediewistyczne 5 (1964) 3–190.Google Scholar
Senner, Walter. “Jean de Sterngassen et son commentaire des Sentences,” Revue Thomiste 97 (1997) 83–98.Google Scholar
Senner, Walter and Anzulewicz, Henryk (eds.). Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
Serene, Eileen. “Demonstrative Science,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 496–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, F. Tyler. “A Bibliography of William of Saint-Thierry,” in Dutton, M. (ed.) Truth as Gift: Studies in Medieval Cistercian History in Honor of John R. Sommerfeldt (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 2004) 457–82.Google Scholar
ševčenko, Ihor. études sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos (Brussels: éditions de Byzantion, 1962).Google Scholar
Seymour, M. C.Bartholomaeus Anglicus and his Encyclopedia (Aldershot: Variorum, 1992).Google Scholar
Sezgin, Fuat. Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums (Leiden: Brill, 1967–).Google Scholar
Sezgin, Fuat. (ed.). Ibn Bajja Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn as-Saigh: Texts and Studies I (Frankfurt: Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science, 1999).Google Scholar
Sezgin, Fuat et al. (eds.). Thābit ibn Qurra (d. 288/901): Texts and Studies (Frankfurt: Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science, 1997).Google Scholar
Shaked, Shaul. “Paymān: An Iranian Idea in Contact with Greek Thought and Islam,” in Transition Periods in Iranian History (Paris: Association pour l’Avancement des études Iraniennes, 1987) 217–40.Google Scholar
Shaki, Mansour. “The Dēnkard Account of the History of the Zoroastrian Scriptures,” Archív Orientální 49 (1981) 114–25.Google Scholar
Shank, Michael H.Unless You Believe, You Shall Not Understand: Logic, University, and Society in Late Medieval Vienna (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Marc. Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles Reappraised (Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2004).Google Scholar
Sharp, Dorothea E.Franciscan Philosophy at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century (London: Milford, 1930).Google Scholar
Sharp, Dorothea E.Richard of Middleton, Franciscan Philosophy at Oxford,” British Society of Franciscan Studies 16 (1930) 211–76.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W.Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate (London: Duckworth, 1983).Google Scholar
Sheedy, Anna. Bartolus on Social Conditions in the Fourteenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael W.The Religious Orders 1220–1370,” in Catto, J. I. (ed.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. I: The Early Oxford Schools (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984) 193–224.Google Scholar
Shehadi, Fadlou. Ghazali’s Unique Unknowable God: A Philosophical Critical Analysis of Some of the Problems Raised by Ghazali’s View of God as Utterly Unique and Unknowable (Leiden: Brill, 1964).Google Scholar
Sherif, Mohamed Ahmed. Ghazali’s Theory of Virtue (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Shibli Numani, Muhammad. Abu Hanifah: Life and Work, tr. Hussain, M. Hadi (New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan, 1988).Google Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. The Teleological Ethics of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Shogimen, Takashi. “From Disobedience to Toleration: William of Ockham and the Medieval Discourse of Fraternal Correction,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 52 (2001) 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogimen, Takashi. Ockham and Political Discourse in the Late Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicard, Patrice. Hugues de Saint-Victor et son école: introduction, choix de texte, traduction et commentaries (Turnhout: Brepols, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, Paul E.Nicholas of Cusa and Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sihvola, Juha and Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (eds.). The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikes, Jeffrey. Peter Abailard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Sileo, L.Dalla lectio alla disputatio: le Questioni de modo essendi Dei in creaturis, De existentia rerum in Deo e De voluntate Dei di Odi Rigaldi,” in Cacciotti, A. and Mottoni, B. Faes (eds.) Editori di Quaracchi, 100 anni dopo. Bilancio e prospettive (Rome: Edizioni Antonianum, 1997) 109–31.Google Scholar
Silk, Edmund. Saeculi noni auctoris in Boetii Consolationem philosophiae commentarius (Rome: American Academy in Rome, 1935).Google Scholar
Silman, Yochanan. Philosopher and Prophet: Judah Halevi, the Kuzari and the Evolution of his Thought, tr. Schramm, L. J. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Silvas, Anna. Jutta and Hildegard: The Biographical Sources (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Theodore. “Daniel of Morley, English Cosmologist and Student of Arabic Science,” Mediaeval Studies 10 (1948) 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valsanzibio, Silvestro da. Vita e dottrina di Gaetano di Thiene, filosofo dello studio di Padova, 1387–1465 (Padua: Studio filosofico dei FF.MM. cappuccini, 1949).Google Scholar
Sinkewicz, Robert E.The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God in the EarlyWritings of Barlaam the Calabrian,” Mediaeval Studies 44 (1982) 181–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. “The Expositio Problematum Aristotelis of Peter of Abano,” Isis 61 (1970) 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirat, Colette. AHistory of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Sirat, Colette, Klein-Braslavy, Sara, and Weijers, Olga (eds.). Les méthodes de travail de Gersonide et le maniement du savoir chez les scolastiques (Paris: Vrin, 2003).Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “Institutiones Grammaticae XVII, 187: Three Reactions,” in Rosier, I. (ed.) L’héritage des grammairiens latins de l’antiquité aux lumières (Leuven: Peeters, 1988) 171–81.Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “Robert Kilwardby as ‘Scientific Grammarian’,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 10 (1990) 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “Robert Kilwardby: Figurative Constructions and the Limits of Grammar,” in Bursill-Hall, G. L. (ed.) De ortu grammaticae (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “The Science of Language and Linguistic Knowledge: John of Denmark and Robert Kilwardby,” in Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (Tübingen: Narr, 1995) 109–34.Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “Socrates’ Hood: LexicalMeaning and Syntax in Jordanus and Kilwardby,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 44 (1983) 102–21.Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “‘The Universal Living Thing is Either Nothing or Posterior.’ Radulphus Brito’s Quaestiones super libros De anima,” in Bakker, P. J. J. M. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (eds.) Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007) 45–68.Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “‘Utrum idem sint dicere et intelligere sive videre in mente’: Robert Kilwardby, Quaestiones in librum primum Sententiarum,” Vivarium 45 (2007) 253–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. The English Friars and Antiquity in the Early XIVth Century (Oxford: Blackwell, 1960).Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. “John Baconthorp’s Postill on StMatthew,” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 4 (1958) 91–145.Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. “Robert Bacon and the Early Dominican School at Oxford,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 30 (1948) 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. “Which William of Nottingham?”, Medieval and Renaissance Studies 3 (1954), 200–38.Google Scholar
Smith, A. Mark. “The Alhacenian Account of Spatial Perception and its Epistemological Implications,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2005) 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jane. “Islam and Christendom,” in Esposito, J. (ed.) Oxford History of Islam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Smoller, Laura Ackerman. “Astrology and the Sibyls: John of Legnano’s De adventu Christi and the Natural Theology of the Later Middle Ages,” Science in Context 20 (2007) 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoller, Laura Ackerman. History, Prophecy, and the Stars: The Christian Astrology of Pierre d’Ailly (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc. “La logique d’un texte médiéval: Guillaume d’Auxerre et la question du possible,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 98 (2000) 250–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc. “Thomistes et antithomistes face à la question de l’infini créé: Durand de Saint-Pourçain, Hervé de Nédellec et Jacques de Metz,” Revue Thomiste 97 (1997) 219–44.Google Scholar
Solignac, Aimé. “Péchés capitaux,” in Viller, M., Raciti, Gaetano, and Solignac, Aimé (eds.) Dictionnaire de spiritualité (Paris: Beauchesne, 1937–95) XII.1: 853–62.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. Aristotle’s System of the Physical World: A Comparison with his Predecessors (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Matter, Space, and Motion (London: Duckworth, 1988).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Time, Creation, and the Continuum (London: Duckworth, 1983).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard and Rodin, David (eds.). The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Sorge, Valeria. “L’ente e l’uno in una questione inedita di Taddeo da Parma,” in Vescovini, G. Federici (ed.) Le problème des transcendentaux du XIV au XVII siècle (Paris: Vrin, 2002) 23–34.Google Scholar
Sorge, Valeria. Profili dell’averroismo bolognese: metafisica e scienza in Taddeo da Parma (Naples: Luciano, 2001).Google Scholar
Souffrin, Pierre and Segonds, Alain-Philippe (eds.). Nicolas Oresme: tradition et innovation chez un intellectuel du XIV siècle (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1988).Google Scholar
Southern, Richard W.Robert Grosseteste: The Growth of an English Mind in Medieval Europe, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Southern, Richard W.Saint Anselm and his Biographer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Southern, Richard W.Saint Anselm: Portrait in a Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Southern, Richard W.Scholastic Humanism and the Unification of Europe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995–2001).Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Five Logical Tracts by Richard Lavenham,” in O’Donnell, J. R. (ed.) Essays in Honour of Anton Charles Pegis (Toronto: Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1974) 70–124.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). (tr.). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994).Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “How to Start and Stop: Walter Burley on the Instant of Transition,” Journal of Philosophical Research 19 (1994) 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification,” Medioevo 7 (1981) 115–34.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Insolubles,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2005 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/insolubles/.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Introduction,” in Wyclif, John, On Universals (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985) vii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Logic of sit verum in Richard Brinkley and William of Ockham,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–7) 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Logic of the Categorical: The Medieval Theory of Descent and Ascent,” in Kretzmann, N. (ed.) Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988) 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Manuscripts of William Heytesbury’s Regulae solvendi sophismata: Conclusions, Notes and Descriptions,” Medioevo 15 (1989) 271–313.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). The Mediaeval Liar: A Catalogue of the Insolubilia-Literature (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1975).Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Medieval Theories of Obligationes,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/obligationes/.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Notes on Richard Lavenham’s So Called Summulae logicales, with a Partial Edition of the Text,” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980) 370–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Notes on Some Manuscripts of Logical and Physical Works by Richard Lavenham,” Manuscripta 19 (1975) 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Ockham, Adams and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham,” Philosophical Review 99 (1990) 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Problem of Universals and Wyclif’s Alleged ‘Ultrarealism’,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Richard Lavenham and the Cambridge Logic,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Richard Lavenham’s Obligationes: Edition and Comments,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 33 (1978) 225–42.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Semantics of Terms,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Three Questions by John of Wesel on Obligationes and Insolubilia” (1996): http://www.pvspade.com/Logic/docs/wesel.pdf.
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “The Treatises On Modal Propositions and On Hypothetical Propositions by Richard Lavenham,” Mediaeval Studies 35 (1973) 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). “Walter Burley on the Kinds of Simple Supposition,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent and Stump, Eleonore. “Walter Burley and the Obligationes Attributed to William of Sherwood,” History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1983) 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent and Wilson, Gordon. “Richard Lavenham’s Treatise Scire: An Edition, with Remarks on the Identification of Martin (?) Bilond’s Obiectiones consequentiarum,” Mediaeval Studies 46 (1984) 1–30.Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas. “Bonaventure and the Question of a Medieval Philosophy,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997) 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speer, Andreas. Die entdeckte Natur: Untersuchungen zu Begründungsversuchen einer scientia naturalis im 12. Jahrhundert (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas. “Lectio physica: Anmerkungen zur Timaios-Rezeption im Mittelalter,” in Leinkauf, T. and Steel, C. (eds.) Platons Timaios als Grundtext der Kosmologie in Spätantike, Mittelalter und Renaissance (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005) 213–34.Google Scholar
Spettmann, Hieronymus. “Die Psychologie des Johannes Pecham,” Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 20 (1919) 1–102.Google Scholar
Spinka, Matthew. John Hus: A Biography (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968; repr. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1979).Google Scholar
Spinka, Matthew. John Hus at the Council of Constance (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Spinka, Matthew. John Hus’s Concept of the Church (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Spitzig, Joseph. Sacramental Penance in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Sprandel, Rolf. Ivo von Chartres und seine Stellung in der Kirchengeschichte (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1962).Google Scholar
Sprengard, Karl Anton. Systematische-Historische Untersuchungen zur Philosophie des XIV Jahrhunderts (Bonn: Mainzer Philosophische Forschungen, 1968).Google Scholar
Spruit, Leen. Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge (Leiden: Brill, 1994–5).Google Scholar
Spruyt, Joke. “Gerardus Odonis on the Universal,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 63 (1996) 171–208.Google Scholar
Spufford, Peter. Money and its Use in Medieval Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Aelred. Aelred of Rievaulx: A Study (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1981).Google Scholar
Stadter, Ernst. Psychologie und Metaphysik der menschlichen Freiheit: die ideengeschichtliche Entwicklung zwischen Bonaventura und Duns Scotus (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1971).Google Scholar
Stahl, William and Johnson, Richard. Martianus Capella and the Seven Liberal Arts (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Staley, Kevin. “Al-Kindi on Creation: Aristotle’s Challenge to Islam,” Journal of the History of Ideas 50 (1989) 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staley, Lynn. “Julian of Norwich and the Late Fourteenth-Century Crisis of Authority,” in Aers, D. and Staley, L. (eds.) The Powers of the Holy: Religion, Politics, and Gender in Late Medieval English Culture (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996) 107–78.Google Scholar
Stammerjohann, Harro and Auroux, Sylvain (eds.). Lexicon grammaticorum (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1996).Google Scholar
Stead, M. T.Manegold of Lautenbach,” English Historical Review 29 (1914) 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Carlos. Der Adler und die Nachteule. Thomas und Albert über die Möglichkeit der Metaphysik (Münster: Aschendorff, 2001).Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Das neue Interesse für den Platonismus am Ende des 13. Jahrhunderts,” in Kobusch, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.) Platon in der abendländischen Geistesgeschichte, Neue Forschungen zum Platonismus (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1997) 120–33.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Plato Latinus (1939–1989),” in Hamesse, J. and Fattori, M. (eds.) Rencontres de cultures dans la philosophie médiévale: traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive au XIVe siècle (Louvain-la-Neuve: Publication de l’Institut d’études médiévales/Cassino: Università di Cassino, 1990) 301–16.Google Scholar
Steer, Georg. Hugo Ripelin von Strassburg: zur Rezeptions-und Wirkungsgeschichte des “Compendium theologicae veritatis” im deutschen Spätmittelalter (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, Friedrich. “Der Tractatus de Deo Trino des Hugolins von Orvieto OESA,” Annali della biblioteca governativa e libreria civica di Cremona 7 (1954) 19–57.Google Scholar
Steinschneider, Moritz. Die hebräischen übersetzungen des Mittelalters und die Juden als Dolmetscher (Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1956).Google Scholar
Stella, Prospero T.La prima critica di Hervaeus Natalis O. P. alla noetica di Enrico di Gand,” Salesianum 21 (1959) 125–70.Google Scholar
Stella, Prospero T.Teologi e teologia nelle Reprobationes de Bernardo d’Auvergne ai Quodlibeti di Goffredo di Fontaines,” Salesianum 19 (1957) 171–214.Google Scholar
Steneck, Nicholas H.Science and Creation in the Middle Ages: Henry of Langenstein (d. 1397) on Genesis (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Stephanou, Pelopidas étienne. Jean Italos, philosope et humaniste (Rome: Pontificium Institutum Orientalium Studiorum, 1949).Google Scholar
Stern, Samuel M.Studies in Early Ismaʿilism (Leiden: Brill, 1983).Google Scholar
Stevenson, William Jr.Christian Love and JustWar: Moral Paradox and Political Life in St. Augustine and his Modern Interpreters. (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Stirnimann, Heinrich and Imbach, Ruedi. Eckardus Theutonicus, homo doctus et sanctus: Nachweise und Berichte zum Prozeß gegen Meister Eckhart (Fribourg: Universitätsverlag, 1992).Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. Myth and Science in the Twelfth Century: A Study of Bernard Silvester (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Stone, Abraham. “Simplicius and Avicenna on the Essential Corporeity of Material Substance,” in Wisnovsky, R. (ed.) Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 2001) 73–130.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F.Equity and Moderation: The Reception and Uses of Aristotle’s Doctrine of επιεικεια in Thirteenth-Century Ethics,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 17 (2006) 121–56.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F.In the Shadow of Augustine: The Scholastic Debate on Lying from Robert Grosseteste to Gabriel Biel,” in Aertsen, J. A. and Pickavé, M.; (eds.) Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004) 277–317.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F.‘Initium omnis peccati est superbia’: Jean Gerson’s Account of Pride in his Mystical Theology, Pastoral Thought, and Hamartiology,” in Newhauser, R. (ed.) In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and their Culture in the Middle Ages (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005) 293–323.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F.The Soul’s Relation to the Body: Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant and the Parisian Debate on Monopsychism,” in Crane, T. and Patterson, S. (eds.) History of the Mind–Body Problem (London: Routledge, 2000) 34–69.Google Scholar
Street, Tony. “Tusi on Avicenna’s Logical Connectives,” History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (1995) 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streveler, Paul. “Richard the Sophister,” in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2005 edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/richardsophister/.Google Scholar
Stroick, Clemens. Heinrich von Friemar: Leben, Werke, philosophisch-theologische Stellung in der Scholastik (Freiburg: Herder, 1954).Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. Freethinkers of Medieval Islam: Ibn al-Rāwandi, Abū Bakr al-RāzĪ and their Impact on Islamic Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. “On the Maimonidean Controversy in the East: The Role of Abu’l-Barakat al-Baghdadi” [in Hebrew, ], in Ben-Shammai, H. (ed.) Hebrew and Arabic Studies in Honour of Joshua Blau (Tel Aviv, 1993).Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. “Saadya and Jewish Kalam,” in Frank, D. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.) Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, Tilman. “Die Anthropologie des Alfredus in ihrer Stellung zwischen Platonismus und Aristotelismus,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 55 (1973) 366–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Aquinas’ Account of Freedom: Intellect and Will,” in Davies, B. (ed.) Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 275–94.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Augustine on Free Will,” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 124–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Dialectic in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries: Garlandus Compotista,” History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1980) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Saadya Gaon and the Problem of Evil,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997) 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Obligations,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman. “Absolute Simplicity,” Faith and Philosophy 2 (1985) 353–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturlese, Loris. Dokumente und Forschungen zu Leben und Werke Dietrichs von Freiberg (Hamburg: Meiner, 1984).Google Scholar
Sturlese, Loris. “Gottebenbildichkeit und Beseelung des Himmels in den Quodlibeta Heinrichs von Lübeck OP,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 24 (1977) 191–233.Google Scholar
Sturlese, Loris. “Johannes Picardi von Lichtenberg,” in Stammler, W. et al. (eds.) Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters: Verfasserlexikon (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1977–) IV: 706–10.Google Scholar
Suárez, Gregorio. “El pensamiento de Egidio Romano en torno a la distinci ón de esencia y existencia,” La Ciencia Tomista 75 (1948) 66–99, 230–72.Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Karl. “Die Salernitaner Handschrift in Breslau,” Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 12 (1920) 101–48.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Thomas. Benedictine Monks at the University of Paris, A.D. 1229–1500: A Biographical Register (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Thomas. “The Quodlibeta of the Canons Regular and the Monks,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 359–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Jenny. John of Wales: A Study of the Works and Ideas of a Thirteenth-Century Friar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Scott G.The Medieval Foundations of John Locke’s Theory of Natural Rights: Rights of Subsistence and the Principle of Extreme Necessity,” History of Political Thought 18 (1997) 403–12.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Eileen. Logic, Theology, and Poetry in Boethius, Abelard, and Alan of Lille: Words in the Absence of Things (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, Eileen. “Restructuring Desire: Aquinas, Hobbes, and Descartes on the Passions,” in Brown, S. F. (ed.) Meeting of the Minds: The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998) 215–33.Google Scholar
Swift, Louis J.Augustine on War and Killing: Another View,” Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973) 369–83.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “Mathematical Physics and Imagination in the Work of the Oxford Calculators: Roger Swineshead’s On Natural Motions,” in Clagett, M., Grant, E. and Murdoch, J. (eds.) Mathematics and its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Essays in Honor of Marshall Clagett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) 69–101.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “Medieval Concepts of the Latitude of Forms: The Oxford Calculators,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 40 (1973) 251–71.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “Medieval Quantifications of Qualities: The ‘Merton School’,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 8 (1971) 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “The Oxford Calculators,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 540–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “The Oxford Calculators and Mathematical Physics: John Dumbleton’s Summa logicae et philosophiae naturalis, Parts II and III,” in Unguru, S. (ed.) Physics, Cosmology and Astronomy, 1300–1700: Tension and Accommodation (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991) 129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith. The Oxford Calculators and the Mathematics of Motion, 1320–1350: Physics and Measurement by Latitudes (New York: Garland, 1991).Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “William Heytesbury on the Sophism ‘Infinita sunt finita’,” in Beckmann, J. P. and Kluxen, W. (eds.) Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981) II: 628–36.Google Scholar
Synan, Edward. “The Insolubilia of Roger Nottingham, O.F.M.,” Mediaeval Studies 26 (1964) 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith. “The ‘Introitus ad sententias’ of Roger Nottingham, O.F.M.,” Mediaeval Studies 25 (1963) 259–79.Google Scholar
Tabarroni, Andrea. “Lo pseudo-Egidio (Guglielmo Arnaldi) e un’inedita continuazione del commento di Tommaso al ‘Peryermenias’,” Medioevo 14 (1988) 371–427.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “The Influence of Richard Campsall on Fourteenth-Century Oxford Thought,” in Hudson, A. and Wilks, M. (eds.) From Ockham to Wyclif (,Sylla, Edith. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987) 109–23.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “Introduction,” in Streveler, P. et al. (eds.) Seeing the Future Clearly: Questions on Future Contingents (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1995) 1–98.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “Logic’s God and the Natural Order in Late Medieval Oxford: The Teaching of Robert Holcot,” Annals of Science 53 (1996) 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “The Problem of the species in medio at Oxford in the Generation after Ockham,” Mediaeval Studies 44 (1982) 394–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “The ‘Questiones in Primum Librum Sententiarum’ of Andreas de Novocastro,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 69 (1992) 289–318.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “Richard Campsall as a Theologian: New Evidence,” in Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O. (eds.) Historia philosophiae medii aevi: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters: Festschrift für Kurt Flasch (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991) 979–1002.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “Robert Holcot on Contingency and Divine Deception,” in Bianchi, L. and Eugenio, R. (eds.) Filosofia e teologia nel trecento: studi in ricordo di Eugenio Randi (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des instituts d’études médiévales, 1994) 157–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345 (Leiden: Brill, 1988).Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine. “Wodeham, Crathorn, and Holcot: The Development of the complexe significabile,” in Rijk, L. M. and Braakhuis, H. (eds.) Logos and Pragma (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1987) 161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, Rafael. “NaẒra ğadĪda fĪ qaḍiyyat aqsām al-kalām: dirāsaḥawl kitāb Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ fĪ al-manṭiq,” al-Karmil 12 (1991) 43–67.Google Scholar
Tambrun, Brigitte. Pléthon: le retour de Platon (Paris: Vrin, 2006).Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman (ed.). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils (London: Sheed and Ward, 1990).Google Scholar
Tardieu, Michel. “Chosroès,” in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques (Paris: CNRS éditions, 1994) II: 309–18.Google Scholar
Tardieu, Michel. “La recension arabe des Magika logia,” in Tambrun-Krasker, B. (ed.) Oracles Chaldaïques: recension de Georges Gémiste Pléthon (Athens: Academy of Athens, 1995) 157–71.Google Scholar
Taschow, Ulrich. Nicole Oresme und der Frühling der Moderne: die Ursprünge unserer modernen quantitativ-metrischen Weltaneignungsstrategien und neuzeitlichen Bewusstseins- und Wissenschaftskultur (Halle: Avox Medien-Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Tatakis, Basil. Byzantine Philosophy, tr. Moutafakis, N. J. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2003).Google Scholar
Tatakis, Basil. La philosophie Byzantine (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1949).Google Scholar
Tavard, George H.Trina Deitas: The Controversy between Hincmar and Gottschalk (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Teetaert, Amedeus. “La ‘Formula confessionis’ du frère mineur Jean Rigaud (d. 1323),” in Miscellanea historica in honorem Alberti de Meyer (Leuven: Bibliothèque de l’Université, 1946) 651–76.Google Scholar
Teetaert, Amedeus. “La littérature quodlibetique,” Ephemerides theologiae Lovanienses 14 (1937) 77–105.Google Scholar
Teeuwen, Mariken. The Vocabulary of Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixidor, Javier. Aristote en syriaque (Paris: CNRS éditions, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellenbach, Gerd. The Church in Western Europe from the Tenth to the Early Twelfth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terian, Abraham. “The Hellenizing School: Its Time, Place, and Scope of Activities Reconsidered,” in Garsoian, N. et al. (eds.) East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1980) 175–86.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland. Studies in the Philosophy of William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris (1228–1249) (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Teske, Roland. “William of Auvergne’s Debt to Avicenna,” in Janssens, J. and Smet, D. (eds.) Avicenna and his Heritage (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002) 153–70.Google Scholar
Tessier, Georges. “Jean de Mirecourt, philosophe et théologien,” Histoire litteraire de la France 40 (1974) 1–52.Google Scholar
Teuffel, W. S.Geschichte der Römische Literatur, 6th edn (Teubner: Leipzig, 1910–16).Google Scholar
Theissing, Hermann. Glaube und Theologie bei Robert Cowton OFM (Münster: Aschendorff, 1970).Google Scholar
Théry, Gabriel. Autour du décret de 1210: II. Alexandre d’Aphrodise (Kain: Le Saulchoir, 1926).Google Scholar
Théry, Gabriel. études dionysiennes (Paris: Vrin, 1937).Google Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.The Buridan School Reassessed: Buridan and Albert of Saxony,” Vivarium 42 (2004) 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris, 1200–1400 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.Master Amalric and the Amalricians: Inquisitorial Procedure and the Suppression of Heresy at the University of Paris,” Speculum 71 (1996) 43–65.Google Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.The Quest for Certain Knowledge in the Fourteenth Century: Nicholas of Autrecourt against the Academics,” in Sihvola, J. (ed.) Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition (Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, 2000) 199–223.Google Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.The Response to Thomas Aquinas in the Early Fourteenth Century: Eternity and Infinity in the Works of Henry of Harclay, Thomas of Wilton and William of Alnwick OFM,” in Wissink, J. B. M. (ed.) The Eternity of the World in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas and his Contemporaries (Leiden: Brill, 1990) 82–100.Google Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H. and Zupko, Jack (eds.). The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. Logic and Ontology in the Syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ivo. “Maxims in Kilwardby,” Dominican Studies 7 (1954) 129–46.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rudolf (ed.). Petrus Abaelardus: Person, Wirk, und Wirkung (Trier: Paulinus-Verlag, 1980).Google Scholar
Thomson, R. B.Two Astronomical Tractates of Abbo of Fleury,” in North, J. D. and Roche, J. J. (eds.) The Light of Nature: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science Presented to A. C. Crombie (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1985) 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison. “A Further Note on Master Adam of Bocfeld,” Medievalia et Humanistica 12 (1958) 23–32.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison. “The ‘Notule’ of Grosseteste on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Proceedings of the British Academy 19 (1934) 3–26.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison. “The Philosophical Basis of Wyclif’s Theology,” Journal of Religion 11 (1931) 86–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison. “The Works of Magister Adam of Bocfield (Bouchermefort),” Medievalia et Humanistica 2 (1944) 55–87.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison. The Writings of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln 1235–1253 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Thomson, W. R.The Latin Writings of John Wyclyf: An Annotated Catalog (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1983).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn.A History of Magic and Experimental Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1923–58).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn.Manuscripts of the Writings of Peter of Abano,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 15 (1944) 201–19.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn.Michael Scot (London: Nelson, 1965).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn.A New Work by Robert Holcot (Corpus Christi College, Oxford, MS 138),” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences 10 (1957) 227–35.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn and Kibre, Pearl. A Catalogue of Incipits of Mediaeval Scientific Writings in Latin (London: Mediaeval Academy of America, 1963).Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, Paul. Un prédicateur populaire dans l’Italie de la Renaissance: Saint Bernardin de Sienne, 1380–1444 (Paris: Bloud et Gay, 1926).Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles. Extraits de divers manuscrits latins, pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Age (Paris: Bibliothèque Impériale, 1869; repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. Foundations of the Conciliar Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism, new edn (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “Hierarchy, Consent and the ‘Western Tradition’,” Political Theory 15 (1987) 646–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Brian. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law, 1150–1625 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “Marsilius on Rights,” Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (1991) 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Brian. Medieval Poor Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. Origins of Papal Infallibility, 1150–1350: A Study on the Concepts of Infallibility, Sovereignty and Tradition in the Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 1972).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “‘The Prince is Not Bound by the Laws’: Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State,” in Rossi, G. (ed.) Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Accursiani (Milan: Giuffrè, 1968) III: 1245–74.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “Tuck on Rights: Some Medieval Problems,” History of Political Thought 4 (1983) 429–41.Google Scholar
Tihon, Paul. Foi et théologie selon Godefroid de Fontaines (Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer, 1966).Google Scholar
Tinnefeld, Franz. “Ein Text des Prochoros Kydones in Vat. gr. 609 über die Bedeutung der Syllogismen für die theologische Erkenntnis,” in Schoors, A. and Deun, P. (eds.) Philohistôr: miscellenea in honorem Caroli Laga septuagenarii (Leuven: Peeters, 1994) 515–27.Google Scholar
Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava. Happiness in Premodern Judaism: Virtue, Knowledge, and Well-Being (Cincinnati, OH: Hebrew Union College Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava. “Philosophy and Kaballah: 1200–1600,” in Frank, D. and Leaman, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 218–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobiass, Marc and Ifergan, Maurice. Crescas: un philosophe juif dans l’Espagne médiévale (Paris: Cerf, 1995).Google Scholar
Tobin, Frank. “Henry Suso and Elsbeth Stagel: Was the Vita a Cooperative Effort?,” in Mooney, C. (ed.) Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999) 118–35.Google Scholar
Tobin, Rosemary Barton. Vincent of Beauvais’ “De Eruditione Filiorum Nobilium”: The Education of Women (New York: Lang, 1984).Google Scholar
Tomson, Peter J. (ed.). Abraham Ibn Ezra: savant universel (Brussels: Institutum Judaicum, 2000).Google Scholar
Tornero Poveda, E.Al-Kindi: la transformacion de un pensamiento religioso en un pensamiento racional (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1992).Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol. I: The Person and his Work, tr. Royal, R. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol. II: Spiritual Master (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre and Bouthillier, Denise. Pierre le Vénérable et sa vision du monde: sa vie, son oeuvre, l’homme et le démon (Leuven: Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense, 1986).Google Scholar
Touati, Charles. La pensée philosophique et théologique de Gersonide (Paris: éditions de Minuit, 1973).Google Scholar
Touati, Charles. “La providence divine chez Hasdai Crescas,” Daʿat 10 (1983) 15–31.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Augustinian Theology of the 14th Century: Notes on Editions, Marginalia, and Booklore,” Augustiniana 6 (1956) 146–274.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Hiltalinger’s Augustinian Quotations,” Augustiniana 4 (1954) 412–49.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Notes on Some Manuscripts of the Augustinian Michael de Massa (†1337),” Augustinianum 5 (1965) 58–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Peter Ceffons of Clairvaux,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 24 (1957) 101–54.Google Scholar
Travaglia, Pinella. Magic, Causality, and Intentionality: The Doctrine of Rays in al-Kindi (Turnhout: Micrologus, 1999).Google Scholar
Traver, Andrew. “William of Saint-Amour’s Two Disputed Questions ‘De quantitate eleemosynae’ and ‘De valido mendicante’,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 62 (1995) 295–342.Google Scholar
Trifogli, Cecilia. “Averroes’s Doctrine of Time and its Reception in the Scholastic Debate,” in Porro, P. (ed.) The Medieval Concept of Time (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 57–82.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “La dottrina del luogo in Egidio Romano,” Medioevo 14 (1988) 260–90.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Giles of Rome on Natural Motion in the Void,” Mediaeval Studies 54 (1992) 136–61.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Giles of Rome on the Instant of Change,” Synthese 96 (1993) 93–114.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. Liber Quartus Physicorum Aristotelis: Repertorio delle Questioni, Commenti Inglesi ca. 1250–1270 (Florence: SISMEL, 2007).Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Il luogo dell’ultima sfera nei commenti tardo-antichi e medievali a Phyica IV.5,” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana 68 (1989) 144–60.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. Oxford Physics in the Thirteenth Century (ca. 1250–1270): Motion, Infinity, Place and Time (Leiden: Brill, 2000).Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Il problema dello statuto ontologico del tempo nelle ‘Quaestiones super Physicam’ di ThomasWylton e di Giovanni di Jandun,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 1 (1990) 491–548.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “The Quodlibet of Thomas Wylton,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 231–66.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Thomas Wylton on Final Causality,” in Fidora, A. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.) Erfahrung und Beweis: die Wissenschaft von derNatur im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2007) 249–64.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Thomas Wylton on Motion,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1995) 135–54.Google Scholar
Trapp, Damasus. “Thomas Wylton on the Immobility of Place,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 1–39.Google Scholar
Trifogli, Cecilia and Nielsen, Lauge. “Thomas Wylton’s Questions on Number, the Instant, and Time,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16 (2005) 57–117.Google Scholar
Trizio, Michele. “Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 74 (2007) 247–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troeltsch, Ernst. The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, tr. Wyon, O. (New York: Macmillan, 1931; repr. New York: Harper, 1960).Google Scholar
Troncarelli, Fabio. Tradizioni perdute. La ‘Consolazione Philosophiae’ nell’alto medioevo (Padua: Antenore, 1981).Google Scholar
Trottmann, Christian. “Verbe mentale et noétique thomiste dans le De verbo d’Hervé de Nédellec,” Revue Thomiste 97 (1997) 47–62.Google Scholar
Trottmann, Christian. La vision béatifique: des disputes scolastiques à sa définition par Benoît XII (Rome: école française de Rome, 1995).Google Scholar
Troupeau, Gérard. “ʿAbdĪshūʿ ibn BahrĪz et son livre sur les définitions de la logique,” in Jacquart, D. (ed.) Les voies de la science grecque (Geneva: Droz, 1997).Google Scholar
Troupeau, Gérard. “La logique d’Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ et les origins de la grammaire arabe,” Arabica 28 (1981) 242–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trusen, Winfried. Der Prozess gegen Meister Eckhart: Vorgeschichte, Verlauf und Folgen (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1988).Google Scholar
Tsirpanlis, Constantine. “The Career and Writings of Nicolas Cabasilas,” Byzantion 49 (1979) 414–27.Google Scholar
Tsirpanlis, Constantine. The Liturgical and Mystical Theology of Nicolas Cabasilas (New York: Tsirpanlis, 1979).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “Grotius’s Of the Law of War and Peace,” in Burns, J. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) 514–22.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Tugwell, Simon. “Auctor Summularum, Petrus Hispanus OP Stellensis?,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 76 (2006) 103–15.Google Scholar
Tugwell, Simon. “Petrus Hispanus: Comments on Some Proposed Identifications,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 103–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley, Thomas. “John Baconthorpe on Papal Infallibility,” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 19 (1982) 744–58.Google Scholar
Turner, C. J. G.The Career of George-Gennadius Scholarius,” Byzantion 39 (1969) 420–55.Google Scholar
Turner, Denys. The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuve, Rosamond. “Notes on Virtues and Vices,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 26 (1963) 264–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedale, Martin. Abailard on Universals (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976).Google Scholar
Tweedale, Martin. “Logic (i): From the Late Eleventh Century to the Time of Abelard,” in Dronke, P. (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 196–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twersky, Isadore (ed.). Rabbi Moses Nahmanides (Ramban): Explorations in his Religious and Literary Virtuosity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Twersky, Isadore and Harris, Jay (eds.). Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Työrinoja, Reijo. “God, Causality, and Nature. Some Problems of Causality in Medieval Theology,” in Martikainen, E. (ed.) Infinity, Causality and Determinism: Cosmological Enterprises and their Preconditions (Frankfurt: Lang, 2002) 45–60.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. “Ḥālid ibn YazĪd und die Alchemie: eine Legende,” Der Islam 55 (1978) 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. Die Medizin im Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1970).Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. Die Natur-und Geheimwissenschaften im Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1972).Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. “Bartolus on Customary Law,” Judicial Review 52 (1940) 265–83.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages: A Study in the Ideological Relation of Clerical to Lay Power (London: Methuen, 1955).Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. “John of Salisbury’s Policraticus in the Later Middle Ages,” in Jurisprudence in the Middle Ages: Collected Studies (London: Variorum Reprints, 1980) 519–45.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. Medieval Papalism: The Political Theories of the Medieval Canonists (London: Methuen, 1949; repr. Westport, CT: Hyperion Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Ullrich, Lothar. Fragen der Schöpfungslehre nach Jakob von Metz, O.P. (Leipzig: Benno, 1966).Google Scholar
Uña Juarez, Agustín. La filosoifa del siglo XIV. Contexto cultural deWalter Burley (Madrid: Biblioteca ’Ciudad de Dios’ Real monasterio de El Escorial, 1978).Google Scholar
Underhill, Evelyn. The Essentials of Mysticism and Other Essays (New York: Dutton, 1920).Google Scholar
Undset, Sigrid. Catherine of Siena (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1954).Google Scholar
Unguru, Sabetai. “Mathematics and Experiment in Witelo’s Perspectiva,” in Grant, E. and Murdoch, J. (eds.) Mathematics and its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Essays in Honor of Marshall Clagett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) 269–301.Google Scholar
Upjohn, Sheila. In Search of Julian of Norwich (Darton, Longman and Todd, 1989).Google Scholar
Urvoy, Dominique. Ibn Rushd (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Urvoy, Dominique. Penser l’Islam: les présupposés islamiques de l’“Art” de Lull (Paris: Vrin, 1980).Google Scholar
Vajda, Georges. “Autour de la theórie de la connaissance chez Saadia,” Revue des études Juives 126 (1967) 375–97.Google Scholar
Vajda, Georges. “Le dialogue de l’âme et de la raison dans les Devoirs des Coeurs de Bahya Ibn Paquda,” Revue des études Juives 102 (1937) 93–104.Google Scholar
Vajda, Georges. Isaac Albalag: Averroiste juif, traducteur et commentateur d’Al-Ghazali (Paris: Vrin, 1960).Google Scholar
Vajda, Georges. “La philosophie et la théologie de Joseph ibn Zaddiq,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 24 (1949) 93–181.Google Scholar
Vajda, Georges. La théologie ascetique de Bahya ibn Paquda (Paris: Cahiers de la Société Asiatique, 1947).Google Scholar
Valente, Luisa. Logique et théologie: les écoles parisiennes entre 1150 et 1220 (Paris: Vrin, 2008).Google Scholar
Valente, Luisa. “‘Talia sunt subiecta qualia praedicata permittunt,’ Le principe de l’approche contextuelle et sa genèse dans la théologie du XIIe siècle,” in Biard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.) La tradition médiévale des catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles) (Leuven: Peeters, 2003) 289–311.Google Scholar
Valls i Taberner, Ferran. San Ramón de Penyafort (Barcelona: Editorial Labor, 1936; repr. 1979).Google Scholar
Valois, Noël. Guillaume d’Auvergne, évèque de Paris (1228–1249); sa vie et ses ouvrages (Paris: Picard, 1880)Google Scholar
Valois, Noël. “Jean de Pouilli, théologien,” Histoire littéraire de la France 34 (1914) 220–81.Google Scholar
Valois, Noël. “Jean Rigaud, frère mineur,” Histoire littéraire de la France 34 (1914) 286–91Google Scholar
Van den Eynde, Damien. L’œuvre littéraire de Géroch de Reichersberg (Rome: Pontificio Ateneo Antoniano, 1957).Google Scholar
Van der Lecq, Ria. “William Heytesbury on ‘Necessity’,” in Lewry, O. (ed.) The Rise of British Logic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983) 249–63.Google Scholar
Van Engen, John (tr.). Devotio Moderna: Basic Writings (New York: Paulist Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Van Engen, JohnRupert of Deutz (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Van Esbroeck, Michel. “La version géorgienne de deux commentaires d’Ammonius fils d’Hermias,” in Fiaccadori, G. (ed.) Autori classici in lingue del vicino e medio oriente (Rome: Istituto poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato, 1990) 55–64.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Biobibliographische Notizen zur islamischen Theologie,” Die Welt des Orients 9 (1978) 255–83.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “ḍirār b. ʿAmr und die ‘CahmĪya’,” Islam 43 (1967) 241–79; 44 (1968) 1–70, 318–20.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. Die Erkenntnislehre des ʿAḍudaddĪn al-ĪcĪ: Ubersetzung und Kommentar des 1. Buches seiner Mawaqif (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1966).Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. The Flowering of Muslim Theology, tr. Todd, J. M. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: eine Geschichte des religiosen Denkens im fruhen Islam (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1991–7).Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. Theology and Science: The Case of Abū Isḥāq an-Naẓẓām (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1978).Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Wrongdoing and Divine Omnipotence in the Theology of Abū Isḥāq an-Naẓām,” in Rudavsky, T. (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelder, G. J. H. “Ancients and Moderns,” in Krämer, G. et al. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Islam, 3rd edn (Leiden: Brill Online, 2008).Google Scholar
Vanhamel, Willy (ed.). Henry of Ghent: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Occasion of the 700th Anniversary of His Death (1293) (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Van Hove, Alphonse. Commentarium Lovaniense in codicem iuris canonici, 2nd edn (Mechelen: Dessain, 1930).Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Henry. The Problem of Certainty in English Thought: 1630–1690 (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanneste, Alfred. “La théologie de la pénitence chez quelques maîtres parisiens de la première moitié du xiiie siècle,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 28 (1952) 24–58.Google Scholar
Vanni Rovighi, Sofia. L’immortalità dell’anima nei maestri francescani del secolo XIII (Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1936).Google Scholar
Vanni Rovighi, Sofia. “La psicologia di Taddeo da Parma,” Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 23 (1931) 504–12.Google Scholar
Van Roo, William. Grace and Original Justice according to St Thomas (Rome: Gregorian University, 1955).Google Scholar
Vansteenberghe, Edmond. Le Cardinal Nicolas de Cues (Paris: Champion, 1920; repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1963).Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. Maître Siger de Brabant (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1977).Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. La philosophie au XIIIe siècle, 2nd edn (Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1991).Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. Le problème de l’existence de Dieu dans les écrits de S. Thomas d’Aquin (Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1980)Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. St. Thomas Aquinas and Radical Aristotelianism (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Van’t Spijker, Ienje. Fictions of the Inner Life: Religious Literature and Formation of the Self in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Veldhuijsen, Peter. “The Question on the Possibility of an Eternally Created World: Bonaventura and Thomas Aquinas,” in Wissink, J. B. M. (ed.) The Eternity of the World in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas and his Contemporaries (Leiden: Brill, 1990) 20–38.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. “Equal Before the Law: The Evilness of Human and Divine Lies: ʿAbd al- G? abbār’s Rational Ethics,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 13 (2003) 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, Raphaela. Das Buch der Fieber des Isaac Israeli und seine Bedeutung im lateinischen Westen: ein Beitrag zur Rezeption arabischer Wissenschaft im Abendland (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2003).Google Scholar
Veliath, Dominic. “The Scotism of William of Alnwick in his Determinationes de anima,” Salesianum 32 (1970) 93–134.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Gerard et al. (eds.). Corpus latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum (Leuven: Publications universitaires, 1957–).Google Scholar
Verdeyen, Paul. Guillaume de Saint-Thierry, premier auteur mystique des anciens Pays Bas (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdeyen, Paul. La théologie mystique de Guillaume de Saint-Thierry (Paris: FAC-éditions, 1990).Google Scholar
Verger, Jacques. Les universités au moyen âge (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1973).Google Scholar
Verpeaux, Jean. Nicéphore Choumnos: homme d’état et humaniste byzantin (ca.1250/1255–1327) (Paris: Picard, 1959).Google Scholar
Verweij, Michiel. “The Manuscript Transmission of the Summa de virtutibus by Guillelmus Peraldus. A Preliminary Survey of the Manuscripts,” Medioevo 31 (2006) 103–298.Google Scholar
Vetulani, Adam. Sur Gratien et les Décrétales, ed. Uruszczak, W. (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990).Google Scholar
Veuthey, Léon. “Alexandre d’Alexandrie, maître de Paris et ministre général des frères mineurs,” études Franciscaines 43 (1931) 145–76, 319–44; 44 (1932) 21–42, 193–207, 321–36, 429–67.Google Scholar
Vial, Marc. Jean Gerson: théoricien de la théologie mystique (Paris: Vrin, 2006).Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. “Un accès philosophique au spirituel: l’averroisme chez Jean de Ripa et Paul de Venise,” Archives de philosophie 51 (1988) 385–400.Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. “Le concept de Dieu chez Jean de Ripa,” in Maierú, A. (ed.) Studi sul XIV sec. in memoria di Anneliese Maier (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1981) 453–97.Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. “L’être comme perfection selon François de Meyronnes,” in études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1962) 259–318.Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. Justification et prédestination au XIVe siècle: Duns Scot, Pierre d’Auriole, Guillaume d’Occam, Grégoire de Rimini (Paris: Leroux, 1934; repr. Paris: Vrin, 1981).Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. Nominalisme au xive siècle (Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales, 1948; repr. Paris: Vrin, 1981).Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. “Note sur le concept de forme intensive dans l’oeuvre de Jean de Ripa,” Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Paris: Hermann, 1964) I: 517–26.Google Scholar
Vignaux, Paul. ‘La preuve ontologique chez Jean de Ripa (I Sent. Dist. II Qu. I)’, in Kohlenberger, H. (ed.) Die Wirkungsgeschichte Anselms von Canterbury (Frankfurt: Minerva, 1975) 173–94.Google Scholar
Vilém, Herold. “Der Streit zwischen Hieronymus von Prag und Johann Gerson: eine spätmittelalterliche Diskussion mit tragischen Folgen,” in Wlodek, Z. (ed.) Société et église: textes et discussions dans les universités au moyen âge tardif (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995) 77–89.Google Scholar
Viller, Marcel, Raciti, Gaetano, and Solignac, Aimé (eds.). Dictionnaire de spiritualité ascétique et mystique, doctrine et histoire (Paris: Beauchesne, 1937–95).Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. Le droit et les droits de l’homme (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1983).Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. La formation de la pensée juridique modern, 4th edn (Paris: Montchrestien, 1975) 225–62.Google Scholar
Vineis, Edoardo. “La linguistica medievale: linguistica e grammatical,” in Lepschy, G. (ed.) Storia della linguistica (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1990) II: 11–101.Google Scholar
Visser, Sandra and Williams, Thomas. “Anselm’s Account of Freedom,” in Davies, B. and Leftow, B. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitali, Mari and Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. “Notes sur les deux rédactions des Quaestiones de anima de Jean de Jandun,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 27 (1984) 3–24.Google Scholar
Vittorini, Marta. “La teoria delle idee di Pietro d’Aquila ed i suoi fondamenti ontologici,” in Núñez, M. Carbajo (ed.) Giovanni Duns Scoto: studi e ricerche nel VII centenario della sua morte in onore di P. César Saco Alarcón (Rome: PAA – Edizioni Antonianum, 2008) II: 213–55.Google Scholar
Völker, Walther. Die Sakramentmystik des Nikolaus Kabasilas (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1977).Google Scholar
Volz, Walter. Die Lehre des Johannes de Bassolis von den Produktionen in Gott: ein Vergleich mit der Lehre des Johannes Duns Scotus (Munich, 1969).Google Scholar
Brincken, von den, Anna-Dorothee, . “Geschichtsbetrachtung bei Vincenz von Beauvais: die Apologia Actoris zum Speculum Maius,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 34 (1978) 410–99.Google Scholar
Savigny, von, Carl, Friedrich. Geschichte des römischen Rechts im Mittelalter, 2nd edn (Heidelberg: Mohr, 1834–51; repr. Bad Homburg: Gentner, 1961).Google Scholar
Schulte, von, Friedrich, Johann. Geschichte derQuellen und Literatur des canonischen Rechts (Stuttgart: Enke, 1875–80; repr. Graz: Akademische Druck, 1956).Google Scholar
Vorgrimler, Herbert. Busse und Krankensalbung (Handbuch der Dogmengeschichte IV.3) (Freiburg: Herder, 1978).Google Scholar
Vos, Antonie. The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillaume, Christophe. “La connaissance de Dieu d’après Guillaume de Saint-Thierry,” Collectanea Cisterciensia 57 (1995) 249–70.Google Scholar
Vuillemin-Diem, Gudrun. “Zum Aristoteles Latinus in den Fragmenten der Quaternuli des David von Dinant,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 70 (2003) 27–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillemin-Diem, Gudrun and Rashed, Marwan. “Burgundio de Pise et ses manuscrits grecs d’Aristote: Laur. 87. 7. et Laur. 81. 18,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 64 (1997) 136–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, Yoko (ed.). A Companion to Ancrene Wisse (Cambridge: Brewer, 2003).Google Scholar
Wagner, Claus. Materie im Mittelalter: Edition und Untersuchungen zur Summa (II, 1) des Nikolaus von Strassburg OP (Fribourg: Universitätsverlag, 1986).Google Scholar
Wahl, J. A.Baldus de Ubaldis and the Foundations of the Nation-State,” Manuscripta 21 (1977) 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, Walter L. and Evans, Austin P.. Heresies of the High Middle Ages (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Wakelnig, Elvira. “Metaphysics in al-ʿāmirĪ. The Hierarchy of Being and the Concept of Creation,” Medioevo 32 (2007) 39–59.Google Scholar
Walbridge, John. “SuhrawardĪ and Illuminationism,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 201–23.Google Scholar
Walker, Joel. Legend of Mar Qardagh: Narrative and Christian Heroism in Late Antique Iraq (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Walker, Joel. “The Limits of Late Antiquity: Philosophy between Rome and Iran,” The Ancient World 33 (2002) 45–69.Google Scholar
Walker, Paul E.Abū Tammām and his Kitāb al-shajara: A New IsmāʿĪlĪ Treatise from Tenth- Century Khurasan,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 114 (1994) 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Paul E.Early Philosophical Shiism: The IsmāʿĪlĪ Neoplatonism of Abū Yaʿqūb al-SijistānĪ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Paul E.ḤamĪd al-DĪn al-KirmānĪ: Ismaili Thought in the Age of al-Ḥākim (London: I. B. Tauris, 1999).Google Scholar
Walker, Paul E.The IsmāʿĪlĪs,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 72–91.Google Scholar
Walker, Paul E.The Political Implications of al-Razi’s Philosophy,” in Butterworth, C. (ed.) The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992) 61–94.Google Scholar
Wallace, William. The Scientific Methodology of Theodoric of Freiberg: A Case Study of the Relationship Between Science and Philosophy. (Fribourg: Fribourg University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Wallach, Luitpold. Alcuin and Charlemagne: Studies in Carolingian History and Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Wallerand, Gaston. “Henri Bate de Malines et saint Thomas d’Aquin,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 36 (1934) 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Faith. “The Church, the World and the Time. Prolegomena to a History of the Medieval ‘Computus’,” in Deprez-Masson, M.-C. (ed.) Normes et pouvoirs à la fin du moyen âge (Montréal: Ceres, 1990) 15–29.Google Scholar
Walsh, James. “Buridan on the Connection of the Virtues,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986) 453–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, James. “The ‘Expositions’ of Thomas Gallus on the Pseudo-Dionysian Letters,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 30 (1963) 199–220.Google Scholar
Walsh, James. “Some Relationships Between Gerald Odo’s and John Buridan’s Commentaries on Aristotle’s ‘Ethics’,” Franciscan Studies 35 (1975) 237–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Katherine. Richard FitzRalph in Oxford, Avignon, and Armagh: A Fourteenth-Century Scholar and Primate (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. Providence in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th edn (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Walzer, Richard. Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Ward, Benedicta. Miracles and the Medieval Mind, rev. edn (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Ward, Benedicta. The Venerable Bede (Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse, 1990).Google Scholar
Wassermann, D.Dionysius der Kartäuser: Einführung in Werk und Gedankenwelt (Salzburg: Institut für Anglistik and Amerikanistik, 1996).Google Scholar
Watson, Nicholas. “Middle English Mystics,” in Wallace, D. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 539–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Nicholas. Richard Rolle and the Invention of Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Alan. “Which Approach? Late 20th Century Interpretations of Augustine onWar,” Journal of Church and State 46 (2004) 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, John A.Spiritual and Temporal Powers,” in Burns, J. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 367–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, John A.The Theory of Papal Monarchy in the Thirteenth Century: The Contribution of the Canonists (London: Burns and Oates, 1966).Google Scholar
Watt, John W.Syriac Translators and Greek Philosophy in Early Abbasid Iraq,” Journal of the Canadian Society for Syriac Studies 4 (2004) 15–26.Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. “AḳĪda,” in Gibb, H. A. R. et al. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn (Leiden: Brill, 1960–2004).Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. The Formative Period of Islamic Thought (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. Islamic Creeds (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Watts, Edward. “Justinian, Malalas, and the End of Athenian Philosophical Teaching in A.D. 529,” Journal of Roman Studies 94 (2004) 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Edward. “Where to Live the Philosophical Life in the Sixth Century? Damascius, Simplicius, and the Return from Persia,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 45 (2005) 285–315.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, Joseph. God’s Grace and Human Action: “Merit” in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Webb, C. C. J.John of Salisbury (London: Methuen, 1932; repr. New York: Russell and Russell, 1971).Google Scholar
Weber, Marie-Luise. Die Gedichte des Gottschalk von Orbais (New York: Lang, 1992).Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, tr. Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, T. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. Die Naturrechtslehre der Legisten und Dekretisten von Irnerius bis Accursius und von Gratian bis Johannes Teutonicus (Munich: Hueber, 1967).Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. “Studien zum kanonistischen Werk Stephans von Tournai,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, kanonistische Abteilung 72 (1986) 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. Vinzenz von Beauvais: Scholastische Universalchronistik als Quelle volkssprachiger Geschichtsschreibung (Hildesheim: Olms, 1991).Google Scholar
Weijers, Olga. La “disputatio” à la Faculté des arts de Paris (1200–1350 environ). Esquisse d’une typologie (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, Olga. La “disputatio” dans les Facultés des arts au moyen âge (Turnhout: Brepols 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, Olga. Le travail intellectuel à la Faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (ca. 1200–1500) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1994–).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, Olga and Holtz, Louis (eds.). L’enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des arts, Paris et Oxford, XIIIe–XVe siècles: actes du colloque international (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, A. G.Un traité de Jean de Nova Domo sur les universaux,” Vivarium 6 (1968) 108–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. R.Nicolaus of Autrecourt. A Study in 14th Century Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1948; repr. New York: Greenwood Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, 1980 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1980).Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Albertus Magnus and Universal Hylomorphism: Avicebron,” in Kovach, F. and Shahan, R. (eds.) Albert the Great Commemorative Essays (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1980) 239–60.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Curriculum of the Faculty of Arts at Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century,” Mediaeval Studies 26 (1964) 143–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Ockham and some Mertonians,” Mediaeval Studies 30 (1968) 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.The Parisian Faculty of Arts in Mid-Thirteenth Century: 1240–1270,” American Benedictine Review 25 (1974) 200–17.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.The Place of John Dumbleton in the Merton School,” Isis 50 (1959) 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Repertorium Mertonense,” Mediaeval Studies 31 (1969) 174–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Roger Swyneshed, OSB, logician, natural philosopher, and theologian,” in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964) 231–52.Google Scholar
Weisser, Ursula. Das “Buch über das Geheimnis der Schöpfung” von Pseudo-Apollonios von Tyana (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wels, Henrik. Aristotelisches Wissen und Glauben im 15. Jahrhundert: ein anonymer Kommentar zum Pariser Verurteilungsdekret von 1277 aus dem Umfeld des Johannes de Nova Domo: Studie und Text (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welter, Jean Thiébaut. L’exemplum dans la littérature religieuse et didactique du Moyen Age (Paris: Occitania, 1927).Google Scholar
Wengert, R. G.Three Senses of Intuitive Cognition: A Quodlibetal Question of Harvey of Nedellec,” Franciscan Studies 43 (1983) 408–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wensinck, A. J.The Muslim Creed: Its Genesis and Historical Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932; repr. London: Cass, 1965).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried. “The Continuing Life of William Peraldus’s Summa vitiorum,” in Jordan, M. D. and Emery, K. (eds.) Ad Litteram: Authoritative Texts and Medieval Readers (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992) 135–64.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried. “The Seven Deadly Sins: Some Problems of Research,” Speculum 43 (1968) 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Delno and Zimdars-Swartz, Sandra. Joachim of Fiore: A Study in Spiritual Perception and History (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G.Proclus commentateur des Vers d’Or,” in Bos, G. and Seel, G. (eds.) Proclus et son influence (Zurich: éditions du Grand Midi, 1987) 62–78.Google Scholar
Wey, Joseph. “The Sermo finalis of Robert Holcot,” Mediaeval Studies 11 (1949) 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Despina S.Patriarch Photios of Constantinople: His Life, Scholarly Contributions, and Correspondence Together with a Translation of Fifty-Two of his Letters (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 1981).Google Scholar
White, Kevin. “The Quodlibeta of Thomas Aquinas in the Context of his Work,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibets in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 49–134.Google Scholar
White, Kevin. “St. Thomas Aquinas and the Prologue to Peter of Auvergne’s Quaestiones super De sensu et sensato,” Documenti e studi 1 (1990) 427–56.Google Scholar
Whittingham, Martin. Al-Ghazali and the Quran: One Book, Many Meanings (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Wieland, George. “Plato or Aristotle – A Real Alternative in Medieval Philosophy?,” in Wippel, J. F. (ed.) Studies in Medieval Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1987) 63–83.Google Scholar
Wielgus, Stanislaw (ed.). Marsilius von Inghen: Werk und Wirkung. (Lublin: Akten des Zweiten Internationalen Marsilius-von-Inghen-Kongresses, 1993).Google Scholar
Wielockx, Robert, “Autour du procès de Thomas d’Aquin,” in Zimmermann, A. (ed.) Thomas von Aquin: Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschungen (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988) 413–38.Google Scholar
Wielockx, Robert, “Henry of Ghent,” in Gracia, J. J. E. and Noone, T. (eds.) A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003) 296–304.Google Scholar
Wielockx, Robert, “Le ms. Paris Nat. lat. 16096 et la condemnation du 7 mars 1277,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 48 (1981) 227–37.Google Scholar
Wilks, Ian. “Peter Abelard and his Contemporaries,” in Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook to the History of Logic, vol. II: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic (Amsterdam: North- Holland, 2008) 83–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Ian. “Peter Abelard and the Metaphysics of Essential Predication,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1998) 356–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Michael. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages; The Papal Monarchy with Augustinus Triumphus and the Publicists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Wilks, Michael. “Reformatio Regni: Wyclif and Hus as Leaders of Religious Protest Movements,” Studies in Church History 9 (1972) 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Michael. (ed.). The World of John of Salisbury (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Wilks, Michael. Wyclif: Political Ideas and Practice, ed. Hudson, A. (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Willard, Charity Canon. Christine de Pizan: Her Life and Works (New York: Persea Books, 1984).Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Williams, ThomasFrom Metaethics to Action Theory,” in Williams, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 332–51.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas and Visser, Sandra. Anselm (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Wilson, Curtis. William Heytesbury: Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1956; repr. 1960).Google Scholar
Wilson, Gordon. “The Critique of Thomas Aquinas’s Unicity Theory of Forms in John Peckam’s Quodlibet IV (Romanum),” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998) 423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windeatt, Barry. English Mystics of the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winroth, Anders. The Makings of Gratian’s Decretum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winship, Michael. Seers of God: Puritan Providentialism in the Restoration and Early Enlightenment (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.The Dating of James of Viterbo’s Quodlibet I and Godfrey of Fontaines’ Quodlibet VIII,” Augustiniana 24 (1974) 348–86.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Godfrey of Fontaines and Henry of Ghent’s Theory of Intentional Distinction Between Essence and Existence,” in Köhler, T. W. (ed.) Sapientiae procerum amore: mélanges médiévistes offerts à Dom Jean-Pierre Müller (Rome: Editrice Anselmiana, 1974) 289–321.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Godfrey of Fontaines at the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century,” in Aertsen, J. et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001) 359–89.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Godfrey of Fontaines’ Quodlibet XIV on Justice as a General Virtue: Is It Really a Quodlibet?,” in Schabel, C. (ed.) Theological Quodlibets in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 287–344.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.James of Viterbo on the Essence–Existence Relationship (Quodlibet 1, q. 4), and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Relationship between Nature and Supposit (Quodlibet 7, q. 5),” in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981) 777–87.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.The Metaphysical Thought of Godfrey of Fontaines: A Study in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Metaphysics and Separatio according to Thomas Aquinas,” Review of Metaphysics 31 (1978) 431–70.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.The Parisian Condemnations of 1270 and 1277,” in Gracia, J. J. E. and Noone, T. (eds.) A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003) 65–73.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Possible Sources for Godfrey of Fontaines’ Views on the Act-Potency Composition of Simple Creatures,” Mediaeval Studies 44 (1984) 222–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F.The Relationship Between Essence and Existence in Late Thirteenth-Century Thought: Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, Godfrey of Fontaines, and James of Viterbo,” in Morewedge, P. (ed.) Philosophies of Existence Ancient and Medieval (New York: Fordham University Press, 1982) 131–64.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995) 233–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F.Thomas Aquinas and Siger of Brabant on Being and the Science of Being as Being,” Modern Schoolman 82 (2005) 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F.Thomas Aquinas’ Derivation of the Aristotelian Categories (Predicaments),” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (1987) 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F. and Wolter, Allan B. (eds.). Medieval Philosophy: From St. Augustine to Nicholas of Cusa (New York: Free Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Wirszubski, Chaim. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 2001).Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). “Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition,” in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 92–136.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). “The Nature and Scope of Arabic Philosophical Commentary in Post-Classical (ca. 1100– 1900 AD) Islamic Intellectual History: Some Preliminary Observations,” in Adamson, P. et al. (eds.) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries (London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004) II: 149–91.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). “One Aspect of the Avicennian Turn in SunnĪ Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004) 65–100.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert (ed.). “Towards a History of Avicenna’s Distinction between Immanent and Transcendent Causes,” in Reisman, D. C. and al-RahĪm, A. H (eds.) Before and after Avicenna (Leiden: Brill, 2003) 49–68.Google Scholar
Wlodek, Zofia. “Le commentaire de Nicolas d’Amsterdam sur le De anima d’Aristote. Introduction, textes inédits,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 11 (1963) 23–42.Google Scholar
Wohlhaupter, Eugen. Aequitas Canonica: eine studie aus dem kanonischen Recht (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1931).Google Scholar
Wohlman, Avital. L’homme, le monde sensible et le péché dans la philosophie de Jean Scot Erigène (Paris: Vrin, 1987).Google Scholar
Wolf, Georges. “La préface perdue des sermons de Raoul Ardent, chapelain de Richard Ier,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 42 (1979) 35–9.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Elliot. Abraham Abulafia – Kabbalist and Prophet: Hermeneutics, Theosophy and Theurgy (Los Angeles: Cherub Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Crescas’ Critique of Aristotle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew Philosophical Texts,” Harvard Theological Review 28 (1935) 69–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Joseph Ibn Saddik on Divine Attributes,” Jewish Quarterly Review 55 (1965) 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Meaning of Ex Nihilo in Isaac Israeli,” Jewish Quarterly Review 50 (1959) 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Notes on Isaac Israeli’s Internal Senses,” Jewish Quarterly Review 51 (1961) 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.The Philosophy of the Kalam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Plan for the Publication of a Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotele,” Speculum 6 (1931) 412–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.Revised Plan for the Publication of a Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotele,” Speculum 38 (1963) 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, Allan B. (ed.). Duns Scotus, special issue of American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 67 (1993).
Wolter, Allan B.The Formal Distinction,” in Ryan, J. and Bonansea, B. (eds.) John Duns Scotus, 1265–1965 (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1965) 45–60.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan B.The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, ed. Adams, M. M. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Wood, Diana. Clement VI: The Pontificate and Ideas of an Avignon Pope (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Wood, Diana. Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Adam Wodeham on Sensory Illusions,” Traditio 38 (1982) 214–52.Google Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Distinct Ideas and Perfect Solitude: Alexander of Hales, Richard Rufus and Odo Rigaldus,” Franciscan Studies 53 (1993) 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. Ockham on the Virtues (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Richard Rufus of Cornwall and Aristotle’s Physics,” Franciscan Studies 53 (1992) 247–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Richard Rufus of Cornwall on Creation: The Reception of Aristotelian Physics in the West,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2 (1992) 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Richard Rufus: Physics at Paris before 1240,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 5 (1994) 87–127.Google Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Richard Rufus’s De anima Commentary: The Earliest Known, Surviving,Western De anima Commentary,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10 (2001) 119–56.Google Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Richard Rufus’s Speculum animae: Epistemology and the Introduction of Aristotle in the West,” in Speer, A. (ed.) Die Bibliotheca Amploniana ihre Bedeutung im Spannungsfeld von Aristotelismus, Nominalismus und Humanismus (Leiden: Brill, 1995) 86–109.Google Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Walter Burley on Motion in a Vacuum,” Traditio 45 (1989–90) 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Walter Burley’s Physics Commentaries,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984) 275–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “Willing Wickedly: Ockham and Burley Compared,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “The Works of Richard Rufus: The State of the Question in 2008,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 76 (2009) 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega and Andrews, Robert. “Causality and Demonstration: An Early Scholastic Posterior Analytics Commentary,” The Monist 79 (1996) 325–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega, Honnefelder, Ludger, and Dreyer, Mechthild (eds.). John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Wood, Rega and Weisberg, Michael. “Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems about Elemental Composition from Philoponus to Cooper,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2004) 698–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, C. M.George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Woolf, Cecil. N. S.Bartolus of Sassoferrato: His Position in the History of Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
Workman, H. B.John Wyclif: A Study of the English Medieval Church (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Xiberta, Bartolomeu Maria. De scriptoribus scholasticis saeculi XIV ex ordine Carmelitarum (Leuven: Bureaux de La Revue, 1931).Google Scholar
Xiberta, Bartolomeu Maria. Guiu Terrena: Carmelita de Perpinyà (Barcelona: Institució Patxot, 1932).Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. “The Art of Ramon Lull,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17 (1954) 115–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Tetsuo. “Simon of Faversham’sSophisma: ‘Universale est intentio’,” Mediaeval Studies 31 (1969) 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousef, Muḥammad ʿAlĪ Hajj. Ibn ʿArabĪ – Time and Cosmology (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Ypma, Eelcko. “Recherches sur la carrière scolaire et la bibliothèque de Jacques de Viterbe +1308,” Augustiniana 24 (1974) 247–82.Google Scholar
Ypma, Eelcko. “Recherches sur la productivité littéraire de Jacques de Viterbe jusqu’à 1300,” Augustiniana 25 (1975) 223–82.Google Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “Duties, Rules and Interpretations in Obligational Disputations,” in Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.) Medieval Formal Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001) 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “Expositio as A Method of Solving Sophisms,” in Read, S. (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 202–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “Words and Things in Peter of Spain’s Syncategoreumata,” in Angelelli, I. et al. (eds.) Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain (Hildesheim: Olms, 2000) 3–19.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Zainaty, Georges. La morale d’Avempace (Paris: Vrin, 1979).Google Scholar
Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1997–): http://plato.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
Zanin, Fabio.Francis of Marchia, Virtus derelicta, and Modifications of the Basic Principles of Aristotelian Physics,” Vivarium 44 (2006) 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavalloni, Roberto. Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes (Leuven: éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1951).Google Scholar
Zawart, Anscar. The History of Franciscan Preaching and of Franciscan Preachers (1290–1927): A Bio-bibliographical Study (New York: Wagner, 1928).Google Scholar
Ziai, Hossein. Knowledge and Illumination: A Study of SuhrawardĪ’s Ḥikmat al-ishrāq (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Ziegler, Josef. Die Ehelehre der Pönitentialsummen von 1200–1350 (Regensburg: Pustet, 1956).Google Scholar
Ziegler, Josef. Medicine and Religion, c. 1300: The Case of Arnau de Vilanova (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. Albert der Große. Seine Zeit, sein Werk, seine Wirkung (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. “Ein Averroist des späten 13. Jahrhunderts: Ferrandus de Hispania,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 50 (1968) 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. “Bemerkungen zum Physikkommentar des William of Clifford,” in Marenbon, J. (ed.) Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages (Turnhout: Brepols, 1996) 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. “Die Kritik an Thomas von Aquin in Metaphysikkommentar des Ferrandus de Hispania,” in Atti del Congresso Internazionale: Tommaso d’Aquino nel suo settimo centenario (Naples: Edizioni domenicane italiane, 1976) II: 259–67.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. Ontologie oder Metaphysik: Die Diskussion über den Gegenstand der Metaphysik im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert: Texte und Untersuchungen (Leuven: Peeters, 1998).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Albert. “Some Aspects of the Reception of Aristotle’s Physics and Metaphysics in the Thirteenth Century,” in Jordan, M. and Emery, K. (eds.) Ad litteram: Authoritative Texts and their Medieval Readers (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992) 217–27.Google Scholar
Zink, Michel. “La rhétorique honteuse et la convention du sermon ad status à travers la summa de arte praedicatoria d’Alan de Lille,” in Roussel, H. and Suard, F. (eds.) Alain de Lille, Gautier de Châtillon, Jakemart Giélée et leur temps (Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1978) 133–70.Google Scholar
Zoubov, Vasilii. “Walter Catton, Gérard d’Odon et Nicolas Bonet,” Physis 1 (1959) 261–78.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Charles. “Some Texts of Bernard of Auvergne on Papal Power,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 49 (1982) 174–204.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Constantine. “A Repertory of Published Armenian Translations of Classical Texts,” in Fiaccadori, G. (ed.) Autori classici in lingue del vicino e medio oriente (Rome: Istituto poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato, 2001) 415–48.Google Scholar
Zumkeller, Adolar. “Der Augustinertheologe Johannes Hiltalingen von Basel (†1392) über Urstand, Erbsünde, Gnade und Verdienst,” Analecta Augustiniana 43 (1980) 59–162.Google Scholar
Zumkeller, Adolar. Hugolin von Orvieto und seine theologische Erkenntnislehre (Würzburg:. Rita, 1941).Google Scholar
Zupko, Jack. John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Zupko, Jack. “On Certitude,” in Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Zupko, J. (eds.) The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 165–82.Google Scholar
Zwiercan, Marian. “Note sur deux manuscrits du commentaire de Godefroid d’Aspale sur la Physique d’Aristote,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 10 (1961) 103–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×