Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
    • Online ISBN: 9781139095440
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy comprises over fifty specially commissioned essays by experts on the philosophy of this period. Starting in the late eighth century, with the renewal of learning some centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire, a sequence of chapters take the reader through developments in many and varied fields, including logic and language, natural philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, and theology. Close attention is paid to the context of medieval philosophy, with discussions of the rise of the universities and developments in the cultural and linguistic spheres. A striking feature is the continuous coverage of Islamic, Jewish, and Christian material. There are useful biographies of the philosophers, and a comprehensive bibliography. The volume illuminates a rich and remarkable period in the history of philosophy and will be the authoritative source on medieval philosophy for the next generation of scholars and students alike.

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
  • 39 - Religious authority and the state
    pp 537-550
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.002
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Religious authority and the state were conceived very differently in the Byzantine world, the Muslim world, and Latin Europe. Eastern Christendom drew its notion of sacred monarchy from Roman imperial ideology, christianized by Eusebius of Caesarea. Medieval Muslim views on religious authority and the state were quite different from Christian views. Muslims believed that God had given them the task of spreading Islam and, at the same time, subduing the whole world to their rule. The two genres of writing that explicitly discussed the relationship between religious authority and the state were religious jurisprudence and Advices to Kings. A separation between religion and politics may also be seen in the way in which, after the violent civil wars of early Islam, emphasized how unwise, and even impious, it is to engage in politics. The differences between religious authority and the state continued to play a major role in religious thought, political development and social behavior long after the Middle Ages.
  • 40 - Individual autonomy
    pp 551-564
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter encounters 'individual autonomy' in a survey of medieval philosophy, especially in connection with political philosophy. The wealth of sources for personal autonomy and related doctrines, produced a number of philosophical examinations of the relation between individual and community. John of Salisbury is one of the central figures in the emergence of a humanistic spirit associated with the so-called 'Renaissance of the Twelfth Century'. John of Paris proposes an extensive notion of the free sphere of individual action. Marsilius of Padua formulates a reconstruction of the origins of human association and of government that serves as an explanation of both the purpose of civil life and its relation to human nature. William of Ockham evinces a high level of confidence in the capacity of individuals to form judgments about fundamental truths for themselves, separate and distinct from communities or institutional authorities. These thinkers who are discussed above, are among the most important figures in medieval Latin political thought.
  • 41 - Law and nature
    pp 565-576
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The sources for what people know of medieval thinking on law and nature include the Church Fathers and scholastic theologians, as well as Roman legal writings. For the clusters of concepts for which people use the modern English words 'law' and 'nature', a series of Latin terms were used from the ancient world to the Middle Ages. Isidore's starting point was that all laws are either divine or human. Laws of nature fall into the divine category, but human laws vary from race to race, nation to nation, and people to people. Cicero began his De legibus by reflecting on what nature bestows on humanity, and on its implications for the purpose of life and the way human beings are able to form a natural society. Natural rights fall under the topic of law and nature, partly because of a confusion of usage that bedevils the technical terminology both here and elsewhere.
  • 42 - Poverty
    pp 577-592
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The seismic economic changes that occurred in Western and Central Europe roughly between 950 and 1300 and known to historians as the Agrarian and Commercial revolutions had profound, long-term ramifications on the life and societal structures of the continent. Peasant's migration towards the cities was accompanied by a simultaneous development that had been virtually unknown in the early Middle Ages: the problem of economic poverty. The new money economy, with its divergent effects upon rich and poor, gave rise to a series of religious responses that spurred the creation of new forms of religious life hitherto unseen in Western Europe. The Franciscans, approached the issue of poverty as essential to the very core of their identity. Still, some writers, and such figures as Francis of Assisi, insisted that humanity must do better; that creation ought to be able to sustain its creatures; and that those with power ought to strive for this higher end.
  • 43 - Just war
    pp 593-606
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Just war theories were the best compromise between human aggression and Christian pacifism that the church could devise. Just war theories of any age have the difficult dual purposes of restraining and justifying violence. Medieval just war theory is encapsulated in Augustine's four-word phrase: iusta bella ulciscuntur iniurias, 'just wars avenge injuries'. Augustine's thoughts on the just war were only a minor theme in his thought, constituting not so much a coherent position as a cluster of ideas, grouped around the avenging injuries concept. With the revival of learning and the rise of universities in the twelfth century, three disciplines emerged that considered war issues in detail: Roman law, canon law, and theology. The basic text of canon law was Gratian's Decretum, a systematic collection of legislation and opinions. In general, theologians placed more emphasis on the moral dimensions of warfare than canonists did, betrayed more suspicion of military service, and also placed greater emphasis on the individual soldier's responsibility.
  • 44 - The subject of the Aristotelian science of metaphysics
    pp 607-621
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Aristotelian science conveys understanding by showing the necessary relationship between immediately evident first principles and conclusions about the natural world. Metaphysics is central to the structure of Aristotelian science because it validates the principles and concepts assumed in the particular sciences. Avicenna agrees with Aristotle that the subject of metaphysics is entity as entity and its causes. Averroes agrees with Avicenna that metaphysics establishes the principles of the particular sciences, and like Avicenna he lists this as the last part of the study of metaphysics. Albert Zimmermann distinguishes several principal scholastic approaches to the Aristotelian science. Richard Rufus proposes that the subject of metaphysics is substance. According to Aquinas, God is related to metaphysics as the cause of its subject. Ockham, like Aquinas, starts from the psychological definition of science as an intellectual disposition concerning a demonstrated truth. The medieval debate over the subject of metaphysics illustrates the pervasive influence of Arabic thought on the Latin West.
  • 45 - Essence and existence
    pp 622-634
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explores issues contributed to the extensive discussion of essence and existence by Latin thinkers in the thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. The famous scholastic dispute over the relationship between essence and existence has its roots in earlier Latin and Arabic discussions. It is agreed that in his youthful De ente et essentia, Thomas Aquinas defended a real distinction and composition of essence and existence (esse) in all finite beings, that is, a distinction that obtains in reality apart from the mind's consideration. In defending the real identity of essence and existence, Godfrey argues that a concrete noun, an abstract noun, and a verb do not signify really distinct things, but differ merely in their mode of signifying. The first kind of esse (esse essentiae) differs from the essence of a creature only conceptually, and so the essence can be said to be its esse taken in this sense.
  • 46 - Form and matter
    pp 635-646
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The first unquestionably big idea in the history of philosophy was the idea of form. Aristotelian commentators have been puzzled by form and matter for as long as there have been Aristotelian commentators. The conception of matter lends itself naturally to universal hylomorphism: the doctrine that every substance is a composite of form and matter. When matter is restricted to the corporeal realm, the notion of prime matter takes on a more precise meaning. It takes not just as the basement level of any hylomorphic hierarchy, but specifically as the stuff in virtue of which substances count as corporeal substances. Although the obscurity of prime matter is naturally captivating, of far greater significance to medieval philosophy is the conception of form, which serves as the chief analytic tool in nearly every area of Aristotelian thought. There are two basic kinds of form, substantial and accidental. The principal benefit of unitarianism is the work it does in accounting for substantial unity.
  • 47 - Realism
    pp 647-660
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Realism and nominalism were the major theoretical alternatives in the later Middle Ages concerning the reality of general objects. This chapter outlines the main medieval forms of realism, to indicate how the debate over universals and categories evolved. Moderate realists investigated the metaphysical composition of universals from a point of view that one can call 'intensional'. In the fourteenth century, William of Ockham argued that the common realist account of the relationship between universals and individuals was inconsistent with their being really identical. The theses of Walter Burley's ontology depend on what he takes to be necessary in order to defend a realist view of universals. Burley was persuaded that Ockham's arguments were valid, and he sought to escape from the resulting inconsistencies by moving toward Platonism. Wyclif's philosophy exercised an influence on the forms of later medieval realism. The metaphysics proper to the Oxford Realists is substantially a Platonic metaphysics, where universal essences, are the main kind of being.
  • 48 - Nominalism in the later Middle Ages
    pp 661-673
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Nominalism is a major movement in logic and philosophy during the later Middle Ages. There are two great periods of medieval nominalism: the twelfth century and the fourteenth century. The nominalism of the later Middle Ages embraces authors whose doctrines present important differences. The paramount question for understanding the nature of later medieval nominalism is, thus, the status of language and the signs that compose it. Ockham begins his Summa logicae with a discussion of the nature of a sign and its divisions. On the basis of the semantic theory Ockham develop the theory of mental language in an unprecedented way. After having posited in Summa logicae that the universal is a sign, principally a mental sign, Ockham criticize the idea of the universal as a substance. From late antiquity, there is a question of whether the categories are names, thoughts, or things. Late medieval nominalism, addressing this issue, criticizes realist accounts of the categories but transforms the problem.
  • 49 - Accidents and modes
    pp 674-686
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The doctrine of real accidents that Descartes rejects has medieval roots. This chapter explores how these roots formed and developed, how accidents came to be 'real', and how real accidents came to be perceived as a philosophical mistake. In his Categories, Aristotle lists several heads under which nouns and adjectives fall. The Categories distinguishes items along two further dimensions: whether they are 'said of' other items and whether they are 'in' other items. The translation of Aristotle's corpus into Latin together with both a number of Arabic commentaries and a number of independent Arabic treatises introduced a new complexity into an already complex story about accident. The doctrine of real accidents provided a solution to a number of problems in theology, physics and semantics. 'Mode', like 'real accident', is a scholastic term. The doctrine of modes, taken together with the view that all change is creation, annihilation, or local motion, is promising as an account of the extended universe.
  • 51 - Faith and reason
    pp 707-719
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The epistemology of religious belief, a central topic among medieval philosophers, shows no signs of disappearing from the public's consciousness or the philosophers' agenda. A few preliminary, terminological remarks are in order, first about reason, then about faith. This chapter supposes that both faith and reason are propositional, if only because to suppose otherwise makes it hard to see what tensions there are between them. The eleventh century provides us with two distinctive Christian contributors to the debate about faith and reason: Peter Damian and Anselm of Canterbury. Thomas Aquinas retrofitted much of Aristotle's conceptual framework to serve Christian philosophical theology, while recognizing that the content of Aristotelian thought is in tension with theology. Aquinas's psychological theory relies on a fundamental distinction between the human intellect and the human will. In 1277, Stephen Tempier, the bishop of Paris, issued a list of 219 condemned propositions in philosophy and theology, threatening excommunication to anyone who defended or even listened to them.
  • 52 - Mysticism
    pp 720-734
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Current scholars generally behave as though the medieval traditions of mysticism and philosophy in the Latin West have nothing to do with each other. Given the general description of medieval mysticism, it is both possible and useful to distinguish between two subcategories within it, namely, the apophatic tradition and the affective tradition. The apophatic mystic tradition reaches into the Middle Ages from Plotinus through pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and John Scottus Eriugena. A prominent theme is running throughout this tradition involves the respective roles of intellect and will in attaining the end. The affective tradition countered the perception that materiality was inherently negative by placing a heavy emphasis on the Incarnation: if the supremely good God could take on flesh, then flesh itself could not be evil. One might expect medieval mystics to come down on the side of contemplation in the age-old debate about the roles of contemplation and activity in the good life.
  • 53 - Arguments for God’s existence
    pp 735-748
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Kant named the three main sorts of argument for God's existence 'ontological', 'cosmological', and 'teleological'. 'Ontological' arguments are deductive and have no empirical premises. Medieval philosophers developed the temporal regress and 'contingency' cosmological arguments and also retailed Aristotle's argument from motion. Aristotle's argument for a first, unmoved mover that is the ultimate source of motion was championed by al-Fārābī, Maimonides, Aquinas, and hosts of lesser lights. The first of Aquinas's Five Ways gives the core of this argument. Newtonian physics makes the claim that continued inertial motion is not the sort of thing to require a physical explanation. Thereafter, defenders of the argument from motion had to take their chances on the field of metaphysics. The First Way does not reason that causal series must be finite and, therefore, there must be a first cause. In a per se series, every cause other than a first is caused to act by another member of the series.
  • 54 - Describing God
    pp 749-760
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The philosophical problem of describing God arises at the intersection of two different areas of inquiry. The Christian tradition, for example, faces distinctive problems that arise in understanding and describing the triune nature of God. Anselm's approach to the problem of describing God offers a resolution that does not depend on the more elaborate semantic theories to which later writers would appeal. Classical Arabic philosophy puts particular emphasis on the claim that God is intellect. Both al-Fārābī and Avicenna connect God's intellectual nature with his immateriality. For Moses Maimonides, it is the oneness of God, his uniqueness and simplicity, that systematically frustrates our ability to represent God in thought and to speak meaningfully about God. Aquinas accommodates both affirmative and negative predication about God. The essential feature of Aquinas's theory of analogy is that a single term is predicated per prius et posterius: of God in a prior way and of creatures in a posterior way.
  • 55 - Providence
    pp 761-772
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Two texts framed medieval Christian discussions that God exercises providential care and governance over the created order: the biblical Book of Wisdom and Boethius's Consolation of Philosophy. The recovery of Aristotle's natural philosophy in the Latin West provided a vocabulary for analyzing providence. The first book of Alexander's Summa theologica defends the idea of a providential order. Like Alexander, Aquinas seeks to reconcile God's providential governance with Aristotelian causality. Toward the end of the thirteenth century, Aquasparta compiled a set of disputed questions on providence. With the onset of the following century, John Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, and their successors at Oxford adopted a number of ideas that greatly strained thirteenth-century views about providence. Aristotelian causality was undergoing scrutiny in the fourteenth century in ways that made the thirteenth-century approaches to providence less feasible. A way of conceiving the relationship between God and human beings was taking shape that could substitute for the thirteenth-century view, namely, covenantal theology.
  • 56 - The problem of evil
    pp 773-784
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762182.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The problem of evil is raised by the combination of certain traditional theistic beliefs and the acknowledgment that there is evil in the world. Augustine struggled with the question of the metaphysical status of evil; his ultimate conclusion, that evil is a privation of being, was shared by most later medieval philosophers. in Gregory's view it is so difficult to understand how a just and benevolent providence could allow good things to happen to good people. On views common to many medieval authors, the genus within which the greatest goods for human beings fall is personal relationship. In varying ways, on typical medieval views, suffering is understood as one important means by which the worst thing for human beings is warded off and the best thing for human beings is achieved. Medicinal regimes are withheld from people only in case they are so ill that the therapy cannot do them any good.

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Antony Black . Political Thought in Europe, 1250–1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

Antony Black . The West and Islam: Religion and Political Thought in World History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

Donald Nicol . “Byzantine Political Thought,” in J. H. Burns (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Francis Oakley . Kingship: The Politics of Enchantment (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).

John A. Watt Spiritual and Temporal Powers,” in J. H. Burns (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Janet Coleman . “Dominium in Thirteenth-and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke,” Political Studies 33 (1985).

Mary Keys . Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Odd Langholm . The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

A. S. McGrade The Political Thought of William of Ockham: Personal and Institutional Principles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974; repr. 2002).

R. I. Moore The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance inWestern Europe, 950–1250, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).

Takashi Shogimen . “From Disobedience to Toleration: William of Ockham and the Medieval Discourse of Fraternal Correction,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 52 (2001).

Chaim Wirszubski . Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950).

Knud Haakonssen . “The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights,” in I. Hunter and D. Saunders (eds.) Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).

Janet Coleman . “Property and Poverty,” in J. Burns (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Virpi Mäkinen . “The Franciscan Background of Early Modern Rights Discussion: Rights of Property and Subsistence,” in J. Kraye and R. Saarinen (eds.) Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2005).

Peter Spufford . Money and its Use in Medieval Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Oliver O’Donovan . The Just War Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Andrew O’Brien . “Duns Scotus’ Teaching on the Distinction between Essence and Existence,” New Scholasticism 38 (1964).

John F. Wippel James of Viterbo on the Essence–Existence Relationship (Quodlibet 1, q. 4), and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Relationship between Nature and Supposit (Quodlibet 7, q. 5),” in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).

R. James Long . “Of Angels and Pinheads: The Contributions of the Early Oxford Masters to the Doctrine of Spiritual Matter,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998).

Marilyn McCord Adams . “Ockham on Identity and Distinction,” Franciscan Studies 36 (1976).

Fabrizio Amerini . “What is Real? A Reply to Ockham’s Ontological Program,” Vivarium 43 (2005).

Alessandro D. Conti Paul of Venice on Individuation,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998).

Peter King . “Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and Individual Difference,” Philosophical Topics 20 (1992).

E. Jennifer Ashworth . “Theories of Propositions: Some Early Sixteenth-Century Discussions,” Franciscan Studies 38 (1978).

Jan A. Aertsen and Andreas Speer (eds.). Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au moyen âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1998).

Olivier Boulnois . être et representation: une génealogie de la métaphysique moderne à l’époque de Duns Scotus (XIIIe–XIVe siècle) (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1999).

J. Hoover Perpetual Creativity in the Perfection of God: Ibn Taymiyya’s Hadith Commentary on God’s Creation of the World,” Journal of Islamic Studies 15 (2004).

Isabel Iribarren . Durandus of St. Pourçain: A Dominican Theologian in the Shadow of Aquinas (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Norman Kretzmann , Anthony Kenny , and Jan Pinborg (eds.). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. 1100–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

A. S. McGrade (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

David Blumenthal . “On the Intellect and the Rational Soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (1977).

Amy Hollywood . “Inside Out: Beatrice of Nazareth and her Hagiographer,” in C. Mooney (ed.) Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).

Barbara Newman . “Hildegard of Bingen: Visions and Validation,” Church History 54 (1985).

Denys Turner . The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

Nicholas Watson . “Middle English Mystics,” in D. Wallace (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

Hugh Chandler . “Plantinga and the Contingently Possible,” Analysis 36 (1976).

Majid Fakhry . “The Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God,” Muslim World 47 (1957).

John Murdoch . “Infinity and Continuity,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

E. Jennifer Ashworth . “Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth-Century Logic: Aquinas in Context,” Mediaeval Studies 54 (1992).

Diana Lobel . “‘Silence is Praise to You’: Maimonides on Negative Theology, Looseness of Expression, and Religious Experience,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2002).

Kenneth Seeskin Sanctity and Silence: The Religious Significance of Maimonides’ Negative Theology,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2002).

Marilyn McCord Adams . “Ockham on Final Causality: Muddying the Waters,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998).

William J. Courtenay Covenant and Causality in Pierre d’Ailly,” Speculum 46 (1971).

Eleonore Stump . “Saadya Gaon and the Problem of Evil,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997).

Gerhard. Endress Building the Library of Arabic Philosophy: Platonism and Aristotelianism in the Sources of al-KindĪ,” in C. D’Ancona (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Dimitri Gutas . Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʿAbbāsid Society (2nd–4th / 8th–10th Centuries) (London: Routledge, 1998).

Boethius . De consolatione philosophiae; Opuscula theologica, ed. C. Moreschini (Munich: K. G. Saur, 2000).

. “The Letter of Fredegisus of Tours on Nothingness and Shadow: A New Translation and Commentary,” tr. N. Jun , Comitatus 34 (2003) 150–69.

Gabriel Biel . Defensiorum obedientiae apostolicae et alia documenta, ed. H. A. Oberman et al. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968).

John Duns Scotus . Contingency and freedom = Lectura I 39, ed. and tr. A. Vos (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994).

. De visione divinae essentiae, ed. M. Woodward , Franciscan Studies 63 (2005) 325–407.

Proclus . Tria opuscula (De providentia, libertate, malo), latine Guilelmo de Moerbeka vertente et graece ex Isaacii Sebastocratoris aliorumque scriptis collecta, ed. H. Boese (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1960).

Walter Burley . On the Purity of the Art of Logic: The Shorter and the Longer Treatises, tr. P. V. Spade (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000).

William Heytesbury . On Maxima and Minima: Chapter 5 of Rules for Solving Sophismata, with an Anonymous Fourteenth-Century Discussion, ed. and tr. J. Longeway (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1984).

Elliot B. Allen Hervaeus Natalis: An Early ‘Thomist’ on the Notion of Being,” Mediaeval Studies 22 (1960) 1–14.

Robert Andrews . “Denomination in Peter of Auvergne,” in N. Kretzmann (ed.) Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988) 91–106.

Robert Andrews . “Thomas Maulevelt’s Denial of Substance,” in L. Newton (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 347–68.

Robert Andrews and Timothy B. Noone . “A Newly Identified Redaction of Richard Clive’s ‘Quaestiones metaphysicae’: With Edition of Three Questions on Relation,” Manuscripta 38 (1994) 23–41.

Rudolph Arbesmann . “The Concept of ‘Christus medicus’ in St. Augustine,” Traditio 10 (1954) 1–28.

Roger Ariew , John Cottingham , and Tom Sorell (trs.). Cambridge Texts in Context: Descartes’ Meditations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Said Amir Arjomand . The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shiʿite Iran from the Beginning to 1890 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).

E. Jennifer Ashworth . “‘Can I Speak More Clearly Than I Understand?’ A Problem of Religious Language in Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and Ockham,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 29–38.

E. Jennifer Ashworth . Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).

E. Jennifer Ashworth . “Mental Language and the Unity of Propositions: A Semantic Problem Discussed by Early Sixteenth-Century Logicians,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 61–96.

E. Jennifer Ashworth and Paul Vincent Spade . “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford,” in J. I. Catto and R. Evans (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) 35–64.

Matthias Baltes . Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den Antiken interpreten (Leiden: Brill, 1976–8).

Jonathan Barnes . “The Just War,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 771–84.

J. L. Barton The Mystery of Bracton,” Journal of Legal History 14 (1993) 1–42.

Bernardo C. Bazán 13th-Century Commentaries on De anima: From Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas,” in G. Fioravanti et al. (eds.) Il commento filosofico nell’Occidente latino, secoli XIII–XV (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) 119–84.

Samuel Beer . “The Rule of the Wise and the Holy: Hierarchy in the Thomistic System,” Political Theory 14 (1984) 391–422.

Seely J. Beggiani Theology at the Service of Mysticism: Method in Pseudo-Dionysius,” Theological Studies 57 (1996) 201–23.

H. M. Beha Matthew of Aquasparta’s Theory of Cognition,” Franciscan Studies 20 (1960) 161–204; 21 (1961) 383–465.

István Pieter Bejczy and Richard Newhauser (eds.). Virtue and Ethics in the Twelfth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2005).

Catarina Belo . Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Linos Benakis . “Michael Psellos’ Kritik an Aristoteles und seine eigene Lehre zur Physis- und Materie-Form-Problematik,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 56 (1963) 213–27.

Linos Benakis . “Studien zu den Aristoteles-Kommentaren des Michael Psellos,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 43 (1961) 215–38; 44 (1962) 33–61.

Harald Berger . “Albert von Sachsen (1316?–1390). Bibliographie der Sekundärlitteratur,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 36 (1994) 148–85; 37 (1995) 175–86; 38 (1996) 143–52; 40 (1998) 103–16.

Mario Bertagna . “Richard Ferrybridge’s Logica: A Handbook for Solving Sophismata,” in S. Read (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 31–44.

Bernard Besnier , Pierre-François Moreau , and Laurence Renault (eds.). Les passions antiques et médiévales (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2003).

Deborah L. Black Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows,” in S. Rahman et al. (eds.) The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition: Science, Logic, Epistemology and their Interactions (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008) 63–87.

Deborah L. Black Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions,” Dialogue 32 (1993) 219–58.

Deborah L. Black Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformations,” Topoi 19 (2000) 59–75.

Deborah L. Black Knowledge (ʿilm) and Certitude (yaqĪn) in al-FārābĪ’s Epistemology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2006) 11–45.

James Blythe . “Aristotle’s Politics and Ptolemy of Lucca,” Vivarium 40 (2002) 103–36.

Ivan Boh . “Consequences,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 300–14.

E. P. Bos Richard Billingham’s Speculum puerorum, Some Medieval Commentaries and Aristotle,” Vivarium 45 (2007) 360–73.

John Bossy . “Moral Arithmetic: Seven Sins into Ten Commandments,” in E. Leites (ed.) Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 214–34.

Olivier Boulnois . “Duns Scot: existe-t-il des passions de la volonté?,” in B. Besnier et al. (eds.) Les passions antiques et médiévales: theories et critiques des passions, vol. I (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2003) 281–95.

Leonard Bowman . “The Development of the Doctrine of the Agent Intellect in the Franciscan School of the Thirteenth Century,” Modern Schoolman 50 (1973) 251–79.

Patrick Boyde . Dante Philomythes and Philosopher: Man in the Cosmos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

Patrick Boyde . Perception and Passion in Dante’s Comedy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

Johannes Brachtendorf . “Cicero and Augustine on the Passions,” Revue des études Augustiniennes 43 (1997) 289–308.

Jean-Baptiste Brenet . “Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait? Jean de Jandun lecteur d’Averroès,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 68 (2001) 310–48.

Sebastian Brock . “A Syriac Intermediary for the Arabic Theology of Aristotle? In Search of a Chimera,” in C. D’Ancona (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 293–306.

Jeffrey Brower and Kevin Guilfoy . The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

D. Catherine Brown . Pastor and Laity in the Theology of Jean Gerson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

Mary Anthony Brown . “The Role of the Tractatus de obligationibus in Mediaeval Logic,” Franciscan Studies 26 (1966) 26–35.

Stephen F. Brown Gerard of Bologna on the Nature of the Good (Text and Commentary),” in M. Pickavé (ed.) Der Logik des Transzendentalen: Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003) 285–303.

Stephen F. Brown Peter of Candia on Believing and Knowing,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–7) 251–76.

Stephen F. Brown Sources for Ockham’s Prologue to the Sentences (pt 1),” Franciscan Studies 26 (1966) 36–65.

James Brundage . Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

Alexander Brungs . “Roland von Cremona O.P., die Geschichte des geistigen Lebens im frühen 13. Jahrhundert und die Definition der Tugend,” in J. Hamesse (ed.) Roma, magistra mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offerts au Père L. E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 27–51.

Tyler Burge . “Buridan and Epistemic Paradox,” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978) 21–35.

Charles Burnett . “The Coherence of the Arabic–Latin Translation Program in Toledo in the Twelfth Century,” Science in Context 14 (2001) 249–88.

Charles Burnett . “Hermann of Carinthia,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 386–404.

David Burrell . Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).

Geoffrey Bursill-Hall . Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of Partes orationis of the Modistae (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).

H. L. L. Busard Unendliche Reihen in A est unum calidum,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2 (1965) 387–97.

D. A. Callus Two Early Oxford Masters on the Plurality of Forms: Adam of Buckfield – Richard Rufus of Cornwall,” Revue neo-scholastique de philosophie 42 (1939) 411–45.

Monica Calma . “Pierre d’Ailly: le commentaire sur les Sentences de Pierre Lombard,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 139–94.

Margaret Cameron . “Boethius on Utterances, Understanding, and Reality,” in J. Marenbon (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) 85–104.

Joseph Canning . The Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

Stefano Caroti . “Mirabilia, scetticismo, e filosofia della natura nei Quodlibeta di Nicole Oresme,” Annali dell’Istituto e museo di storia della scienza di Firenze 9 (1984) 3–20.

Stefano Caroti . “Oresme on Motion (Questiones super Physicam, III, 2–7),” Vivarium 31 (1993) 8–36.

Jean Celeyrette and Edmond Mazet . “La hiérarchie des degrés d’être chez Nicole Oresme,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 8 (1998) 45–65.

Laurent Cesalli . “Le ‘pan-propositionnalisme’ de Jean Wyclif,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 124–55.

Laurent Cesalli . “Le réalisme propositionnel deWalter Burley,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 68 (2001) 155–221.

Henry Chadwick . “Ego Berengarius,” Journal of Theological Studies 40 (1989) 414–45.

Henry Chadwick . “Origen, Celsus, and the Resurrection of the Body,” Harvard Theological Review 41 (1948) 83–102.

Anwar Chejne . “Ibn Hazm of Cordova on Logic,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 104 (1984) 57–72.

Marshall Clagett . “The Medieval Latin Translations from the Arabic of the Elements of Euclid, with Special Emphasis on the Versions of Adelard of Bath,” Isis 44 (1953) 16–42.

Marshall Clagett . “Richard Swineshead and Late Medieval Physics,” Osiris 9 (1950) 131–61.

J. A. Clarence Smith Bartolo on the Conflict of Laws,” American Journal of Legal History 14 (1970) 157–74, 247–75.

Gerson D Cohen . “The Soteriology of Abraham Maimuni,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 35 (1967) 75–98; 36 (1968) 33–56.

Janet Coleman . “FitzRalph’s Antimendicant ‘proposicio’ (1350) and the Politics of the Papal Court at Avignon,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 35 (1984) 376–90.

Janet Coleman . “Jean de Ripa and the Oxford Calculators,” Mediaeval Studies 37 (1975) 130–89.

Marcia Colish . “Habitus Revisited: A Reply to Cary Nederman,” Traditio 48 (1993) 77–92.

Ann Ryan Collins . Teacher in Faith and Virtue: Lanfranc of Bec’s Commentary on Saint Paul (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Alessandro D. Conti Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages,” in L. Newton (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 369–409.

Alessandro D. Conti Johannes Sharpe’s Ontology and Semantics: Oxford Realism Revisited,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 156–86.

Alessandro D. Conti Ontology in Walter Burley’s Last Commentary on the Ars Vetus,” Franciscan Studies 50 (1990) 121–76.

Alessandro D. Conti A Realist Interpretation of the Categories in the Fourteenth Century: The Litteralis sententia super Praedicamenta Aristotelis of Robert Alyngton,” in L. Newton (ed.) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill, 2008) 317–46.

William J. Courtenay The Academic and Intellectual Worlds of Ockham,” in P. V. Spade (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 17–30.

William J. Courtenay The Dialectic of Omnipotence in the High and Late Middle Ages,” in T. Rudavsky (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 243–69.

William J. Courtenay The Early Career of Nicole Oresme,” Isis 91 (2000) 542–8.

William J. Courtenay Reflections on Vat. Lat. 1086 and Prosper of Reggio Emilia O.E.S.A.,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 345–57.

William J. Courtenay The Registers of the University of Paris and the Statutes Against the ‘Scientia Occamica’,” Vivarium 29 (1991) 13–49.

William J. Courtenay A Revised Text of Robert Holcot’s Quodlibetal Dispute on Whether God is Able to Know More Than He Knows,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 53 (1971) 1–21.

Michael Covington . Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

H. E. J. Cowdrey Lanfranc: Scholar, Monk, and Archbishop (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

William Lane Craig . The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden: Brill, 1988).

Richard Cross . “Infinity, Continuity, and Composition: The Contribution of Gregory of Rimini,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (1998) 89–110.

Richard Cross . The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).

Christopher Cullen . Bonaventure (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).

F. A. Cunningham Richard of Middleton, O.F.M. on esse and essence,” Franciscan Studies 30 (1970) 49–76.

Richard C. Dales Henry of Harclay on the Infinite,” Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (1984) 295–302.

Richard C. Dales The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 1995).

Richard C. Dales Robert Grosseteste’s Scientific Works,” Isis 52 (1961) 381–402.

Saralyn R. Daly . “Peter Comestor: Master of Histories,” Speculum 32 (1957) 62–73.

Peter Damerow , Gideon Freudenthal , Jürgen Renn , and Peter McLaughlin (eds.). Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics (Dordrecht: Springer, 1992).

Herbert Davidson . Moses Maimonides (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Herbert Davidson . “The Relation between Averroes’Middle and Long Commentaries on the De Anima,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1997) 139–51.

Brian Davies and Brian Leftow (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Charles Davis . “Roman Patriotism and Republican Propaganda: Ptolemy of Lucca and Pope Nicholas III,” Speculum 50 (1975) 411–33.

David d’Avray . Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

James Doyne Dawson . “William of Saint-Amour and the Apostolic Tradition,” Mediaeval Studies 40 (1978) 223–38.

James Doyne Dawson . “Richard FitzRalph and the Fourteenth-Century Poverty Controversies,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 34 (1983) 315–44.

Pieter de Leemans . “Peter of Auvergne on Aristotle’s De motu animalium and the MS Oxford, Merton College 275,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 71 (2004) 129–202.

Alain de Libera . “The Oxford and Cambridge Traditions in Logic,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 174–87.

Alain de Libera . “Supposition naturelle et appellation: aspects de la sémantique parisienne au XIIIe siècle,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 63–77.

L. M. de Rijk Each Man’s Ass is not Everybody’s Ass: On an Important Item in Thirteenth-Century Semantics,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 221–30.

L. M. de Rijk On the Genuine Text of Peter of Spain’s ‘Summule Logicales’, Part II: Simon Faversham (d. 1306) as a Commentator of the Tract I–V of the Summule,” Vivarium 6 (1968) 69–101.

L. M. de Rijk On the Genuine Text of Peter of Spain’s ‘Summule Logicales’, Part IV: The Lectura Tractatum by Guillelmus Arnaldi, Master of Arts at Toulouse (1235–1244). With a Note on the Date of Lambert of Auxerre’s Summule,” Vivarium 7 (1969) 120–62.

L. M. de Rijk The Origins of the Theory of the Properties of Terms,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 161–73.

L. M. de Rijk Peter Abailard’s Semantics and his Doctrine of Being,” Vivarium 24 (1986) 85–127.

L. M. de Rijk Richard Billingham’s Works on Logic,” Vivarium 14 (1976) 121–38.

L. M. de Rijk Semantics and Metaphysics in Gilbert of Poitiers: A Chapter of Twelfth-Century Platonism,” Vivarium 26 (1988) 73–112; 27 (1989) 11–35.

L. M. de Rijk Some New Evidence on Twelfth-Century Logic: Alberic and the School of Mont Ste. Geneviève (Montani),” Vivarium 4 (1966) 1–57.

L. M. de Rijk Some Thirteenth-Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation I,” Vivarium 12 (1974) 94–123.

L. M. de Rijk Some Thirteenth-Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation II,” Vivarium 13 (1975) 22–54.

David Delaney . Law and Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Philippe Delhaye . “Le dossier anti-matrimonial de l’Adversus Jovinianum et son influence sur quelques écrits latins du XIIe siècle,” Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951) 65–86.

John A. Demetracopoulos Demetrius Cydones’ Translation of Bernardus Guidonis’ List of Thomas Aquinas’ Writings and the Historical Roots of Byzantine Thomism,” in A. Speer and D. Wirmer (eds.) 1308: 36. Kölner Mediaevistentagung (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010).

Dallas Denery . Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World: Optics, Theology and Religious Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Judith Dijs . “Two Anonymous 12th-Century Tracts on Universals,” Vivarium 28 (1990) 85–117.

Francis P. Dinneen ‘Suppositio’ in Petrus Hispanus: Linguistic Theories and Models,” in G. L. Bursill-Hall (ed.) De ortu grammaticae: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 69–85.

Thomas Dixon . From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Bernard G. Dod Aristoteles Latinus,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 45–79.

E. R. Dodds Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).

Silvia Donati . “The Anonymous Commentary on the Physics in Erfurt,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 72 (2005) 232–362.

Angel d’Ors . “Petrus Hispanus O.P., Auctor Summularum,” Vivarium 35 (1997) 21–71; 39 (2001) 209–54; 41 (2003) 249–303.

Isabelle Draelants . “Une mise au point sur les œuvres d’Arnoldus Saxo,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 34 (1992) 163–80; 35 (1993) 130–49.

Peter Dronke . “Thierry of Chartres,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 358–85.

Thérèse-Anne Druart . “The Human Soul’s Individuation and its Survival after the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation between Body and Soul,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000) 259–74.

William Duba . “The Authenticity of Francis of Marchia’s Quodlibet: The Testimony of Paris, BNF, Ms. lat. 16110,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 91–102.

William Duba . “Continental Franciscan Quodlibeta after Scotus,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 569–649.

Stephen D. Dumont Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction,” Vivarium 43 (2005) 7–62.

Stephen D. Dumont The Origin of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995) 149–67.

Stephen D. Dumont Univocity of the Concept of Being in the Fourteenth Century: John Duns Scotus and William of Alnwick,” Mediaeval Studies 49 (1987) 1–75.

Stephen D. Dumont The Univocity of the Concept of Being in the Fourteenth Century: II. The De Ente of Peter Thomae,” Mediaeval Studies 50 (1988) 186–256.

Jean Dunbabin . “Guido Vernani of Rimini’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics,” Traditio 44 (1988) 373–88.

Jean Dunbabin . A Hound of God: Pierre de la Palud and the Fourteenth-Century Church (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).

William Dunphy . “Peter of Auvergne and the Twofold Efficient Cause,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 1–21.

William Dunphy . “The Similarities between Certain Questions of Peter of Auvergne’s Commentary on the Metaphysics and the Anonymous Commentary on the Physics Attributed to Siger of Brabant,” Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953) 159–68.

R. J. Durling Corrigenda and Addenda to Diels’ Galenica, II, Codices miscellanei,” Traditio 37 (1981) 373–81.

Blake D. Dutton Al-GhazālĪ on Possibility and the Critique of Causality,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10 (2001) 23–46.

Paul E. Dutton and Anneli Luhtala . “Eriugena in Priscianum,” Mediaeval Studies 56 (1994) 153–63.

Peter S. Eardley The Foundations of Freedom in Later Medieval Philosophy: Giles of Rome and his Contemporaries,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006) 353–76.

Peter S. Eardley The Problem of MoralWeakness, the Propositio Magistralis, and the Condemnation of 1277,” Mediaeval Studies 68 (2006) 161–203.

Bruce S. Eastwood Invention and Reform in Latin Planetary Astronomy,” in M. W. Herren et al. (eds.) Latin Culture in the Eleventh Century. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medieval Latin Studies (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) I: 264–97.

Sten Ebbesen . “Boethius of Dacia: Science is a Serious Game,” Theoria 66 (2000) 145–58.

Sten Ebbesen . “The Dead Man is Alive,” Synthese 40 (1979) 43–70.

Sten Ebbesen . “Early Supposition Theory (12th–13th century),” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 35–48.

Sten Ebbesen . “Radulphus Brito: The Last of the Great Arts Masters or: Philosophy and Freedom,” in J. A. Aertsen und A. Speer (eds.) Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000) 231–51.

Sten Ebbesen “What Must One Have an Opinion About,” Vivarium 30 (1992) 62–79.

Dorothy Elford . “William of Conches,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 308–27.

Kent. Emery Reading theWorld Rightly and Squarely: Bonaventure’sDoctrine of the Cardinal Virtues,” Traditio 39 (1983) 183–218.

Gerhard. Endress Grammatik und Logik: arabische Philologie und griechische Philosophie im Widerstreit,” in B. Mojsisch (ed.) Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1986) 163–299.

Joseph Engels . “Thomas Cantimpratensis redivivus,” Vivarium 12 (1974) 124–32.

Amira. Eran Abraham Ibn Daud’s Definition of Substance and Accident,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1997) 228–65.

Charles. Ermatinger Averroism in Early Fourteenth Century Bologna,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 35–56.

Girard. Etzkorn Franciscus de Mayronis: A Newly Discovered Treatise on Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–97) 15–50.

Girard Etzkorn . “John of Reading on the Existence and Unicity of God, Efficient and Final Causality,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 125–221.

James P. Etzwiler John Baconthorpe, ‘Prince of the Averroists’,” Franciscan Studies 36 (1976) 148–76.

G. R. Evans Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

G. R. Evans Fifty Key Medieval Thinkers (New York: Routledge, 2002).

G. R. Evans The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

G. R. Evans A Work of ‘Terminist Theology’? Peter the Chanter’s De tropis loquendi and Some Fallacies,” Vivarium 20 (1982) 40–58.

Seymour Feldman . “A Debate Concerning Determinism in Late Medieval Jewish Philosophy,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 51 (1984) 15–54.

Seymour Feldman . “The Theory of Eternal Creation in Hasdai Crescas and Some of his Predecessors,” Viator 11 (1980) 289–320.

Alexander Fidora . Die Wissenschaftstheorie des Dominicus Gundissalinus: Voraussetzungen und Konsequenzen des zweiten Anfangs der aristotelischen Philosophie im 12. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2003).

John Fisher . “Hugh of St. Cher and the Development of Mediaeval Theology,” Speculum 31 (1956) 57–69.

Paul Fournier . “Le cardinal Guillaume de Peyre de Godin,” Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes 86 (1925) 100–21.

Otfried Fraisse . Moses Ibn Tibbons Kommentar zum Hohenlied und sein poetologisch-philosophisches Programm (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004).

Abel Franco . “Avempace, Projectile Motion, and Impetus Theory,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2004) 521–46.

Daniel H. Frank Maimonides and Medieval Jewish Aristotelianism,” in D Frank and O. Leaman (eds.) Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 136–56.

Daniel H. Frank and Oliver Leaman (eds.). Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Richard M. Frank The Ashʿarite Ontology I: Primary Entities,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9 (1999) 165–231.

Richard M. Frank Can God Do What Is Wrong?,” in T. Rudavsky (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985) 69–79.

Richard M. Frank The Use of the Enneads by John of Scythopolis,” Le Muséon 100 (1987) 101–8.

Karin M. Fredborg The Priscian Commentary from the second half of the Twelfth Century: Ms Leiden BPL 154,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 12 (1990) 53–68.

Karin M. Fredborg Speculative Grammar,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 177–95.

Karin M. Fredborg Universal Grammar According to Some Twelfth c. Grammarians,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980) 69–83.

Gad Freudenthal . “Les Sciences dans les communautés juives médiévales de Provence: leur appropriation, leur rôle,” Revue des études Juives 152 (1993) 29–136.

Russell L. Friedman Dominican Quodlibetal Literature, ca. 1260–1330,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 401–91.

Russell L. Friedman and Chris Schabel Francis of Marchia’s Commentaries on the Sentences: Question List and State of Research,” Mediaeval Studies 63 (2001) 31–106.

Gedeon Gál . “Gulielmi de Ware, O.F.M. doctrina philosophica per summa capita proposita,” Franciscan Studies 14 (1954) 155–80, 265–92.

Gedeon Gál . “Petrus Thomae’s Proof for the Existence of God,” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998) 115–51.

Gedeon Gál . “Quaestio Ioannis de Reading de necessitate specierum intelligibilium: defensio doctrinae Scoti,” Franciscan Studies 29 (1969) 66–156.

Gedeon Gál and Rega Wood . “Richard Brinkley and his Summa logicae,” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980) 59–101.

David M. Gallagher Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76 (1994) 247–77.

Griet Galle . “A Comprehensive Bibliography on Peter of Auvergne,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 42 (2000) 53–79; 47 (2005) 87–96.

Griet Galle . “Peter of Auvergne on the Unicity of the World,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 68 (2001) 111–41.

Miriam Galston . Politics and Excellence: The Political Philosophy of Alfarabi (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).

Daniel Garber . “Defending Aristotle/Defending Society in Early 17th C Paris,” in C. Zittel and W. Detel (eds.) Wissensideale und Wissenskulturen in der frühen Neuzeit (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2002) 135–60.

George Garnett . Marsilius of Padua and ‘The Truth of History’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

Richard Gaskin . “Peter Damian on Divine Power and the Contingency of the Past,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997) 229–47.

Peter Geach . “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 69 (1960) 221–5.

Hester Goodenough Gelber . “I Cannot Tell a Lie: Hugh of Lawton’s Critique of William of Ockham on Mental Language,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984) 141–79.

Bernard Gendreau . “The Quest for Certainty in Bonaventure,” Franciscan Studies 21 (1961) 104–227.

Jean-François Genest . “Aux origines d’une casuistique. La révélation des futurs contingents d’après la lecture de Richard Fitzralph sur les Sentences,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 69 (2002) 239–98.

Kantik Ghosh . The Wycliffite Heresy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

Servus Gieben . “Four Chapters on Philosophical Errors fromthe Rudimentum Doctrinae of Gilbert of Tournai,” Vivarium 1 (1963) 141–66.

Richard Gillespie . “Robert Holcot’s Quodlibeta,” Traditio 27 (1971) 480–90.

Michael T. Girolimon Hugh of St Victor’s De sacramentis Christianae fidei,” Journal of Religious History 18 (1994) 127–38.

Ruth Glasner . “Levi ben Gershom and the Study of Ibn Rushd in the Fourteenth Century,” Jewish Quarterly Review 86 (1995) 51–90.

G. C. Godart ‘Philosophy’ or ‘Religion’? The Confrontation with Foreign Categories in Late Nineteenth-Century Japan,” Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2008) 71–91.

Joseph Goering . “The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession,” Traditio 59 (2004) 175–227.

Shlomo Dov Goitein . “Abraham Maimonides and his Pietist Circle,” in A. Altmann (ed.) Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967) 145–64.

B. R. Goldstein Astronomy and Astrology in the Works of Abraham ibn Ezra,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6 (1996) 9–21.

Lenn E. Goodman Bahya on the Antinomy of Free Will and Predestination,” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983) 115–30.

Wouter Goris . “Implicit Knowledge – Being as First Known in Peter of Oriel,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 69 (2002) 33–65.

Wouter Goris . “Die Kritik des Bernhard von Trilia an der Lehre von Gott als Ersterkanntem: Einleitung und Textausgabe,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 248–319.

Wouter Goris and Martin Pickavé . “Die ‘Lectura Thomasina’ des Guilelmus Petri de Godino (ca. 1260–1336),” in J. Hamesse (ed.) Roma, magistra mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offerts au Père L.E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 83–109.

Mark D. Gossiaux James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 74 (2007) 483–522.

Elisabeth Gössmann . “Hildegard of Bingen,” in M. E. Waithe (ed.) A History of Women Philosophers, vol. II (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989) 27–65.

Heinrich Graetz . “The Significance of Judaism for the Present and the Future,” Jewish Quarterly Review 1 (1888) 4–13.

Edward Grant . The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages: Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Edward Grant . God and Reason in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

Edward Grant . “Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme on Natural Knowledge,” Vivarium 31 (1993) 84–105.

Rainer Grass . Schluβfolgerungslehre in Erfurter Schulen des 14. Jahrhunderts: eine Untersuchung der Konsequentientraktate von Thomas Maulfelt und Albert von Sachsen in Gegenüberstellung mit einer modernen Position (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2003).

Tullio Gregory . “The Platonic Inheritance,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 54–80.

Hermann Greive . Studien zum jüdischen Neuplatonismus: die Religionsphilosophie des Abraham Ibn Ezra (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973).

Frank Griffel . “Al-GhazālĪ’s Concept of Prophecy: The Introduction of Avicennan Psychology into Ashʿarite Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004) 101–44.

Frank Griffel . Al-GhazālĪ’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Frank Griffel . “MS London, British Library Or. 3126: An Unknown Work by al-GhazālĪ on Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology,” Journal of Islamic Studies 17 (2006) 1–42.

Anne Grondeux . “Prologue, prohemium, glose du prohemium dans les manuscrits du Graecismus d’Evrard de Béthune,” in Les prologues médiévaux (Actes du colloque organisé par l’Academia Belgica et l’Ecole française de Rome, Rome 26–28 mars 1998) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000) 323–44.

Anne Grondeux and Elsa Marguin . “L’œuvre grammaticale de Jean de Garlande (ca. 1195–1272?), auteur, réviseur et glosateur. Un bilan,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 21 (1999) 133–63.

Theresa Gross-Diaz . The Psalms Commentary of Gilbert of Poitiers: From lectio divina to the Lecture Room (Leiden: Brill, 1996).

Dimitri Gutas . “Plato’s Symposion in the Arabic Tradition,” Oriens 31 (1988) 36–60.

Jeremiah Hackett and Thomas S. Mahoney . “Roger Bacon Bibliography (1957–1985),” New Scholasticism 61 (1987) 184–207.

Ilsetraut Hadot . “Dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fondé son école de mathématiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen?,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1 (2007) 42–107.

John Haldane . “The Metaphysics of Intellect(ion),” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80 (2007) 39–55.

John Haldon . Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

Olli Hallamaa . “Defending Common Rationality: Roger Roseth on Trinitarian Paralogisms,” Vivarium 41 (2003) 84–119.

Wayne Hankey . “Aquinas and the Platonists,” in S. Gersh and M. J. F. M. Hoenen (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages. A Doxographic Approach (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002) 279–324.

N. M. Häring Everard of Ypres and his Appraisal of the Conflict between St. Bernard and Gilbert of Poitiers,” Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955) 143–72.

N. M. Häring In Search of Adhemar’s Patristic Collection,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 336–46.

N. M. Häring The Liber de differentia naturae et personae by Hugh Etherian and the Letters Addressed to him by Peter of Vienna and Hugh of Honau,” Mediaeval Studies 24 (1962) 1–34.

N. M. Häring Simon of Tournai and Gilbert of Poitiers,” Mediaeval Studies 27 (1965) 325–30.

H. L. A. Hart Are There Any Natural Rights?,” Philosophical Review 64 (1955) 175–91.

Steven Harvey (ed.) The Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedias of Science and Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).

Warren Harvey . “Albo’s Discussion of Time,” Jewish Quarterly Review 70 (1979–80) 210–38.

Dag Nikolaus Hasse . “Plato Arabico-latinus: Philosophy – Wisdom Literature – Occult Sciences,” in S. Gersh and M. J. F. M. Hoenen (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002) 31–65.

Sami Hawi . “Ibn Tufayl’s Appraisal of his Predecessors and their Influence on his Thought,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 7 (1976) 89–121.

Robert J. Henle Saint Thomas and Platonism: A Study of Plato and Platonici Texts in the Writings of Saint Thomas (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1956).

Michael Herren . “Manegold of Lautenbach’s Scholia on the Metamorphoses – Are There More?” Notes and Queries 51 (2004) 218–23.

Vesa Hirvonen . Passions in William Ockham’s Philosophical Psychology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004).

Edgar Hocedez . “Un question inédite de Pierre d’Auvergne sur l’individuation,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 36 (1934) 355–86.

Ludwig Hödl . “Die Opposition des Johannes de Polliaco gegen die Schule der Gandavistae,” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch 9 (2004) 115–77.

Ludwig Hödl . “The Quodlibeta of John of Pouilly († ca. 1328) and the Philosophical and Theological Debates at Paris 1307–1312,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 199–229.

Ludwig Hödl . “Die Seinsdifferenz des möglichen im Quodlibet des Jacobus von Ascoli Ordinis Minorum,” in O. Pluta (ed.) Die Philosophie im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1988) 465–94.

Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen Academic Theology in the Fifteenth Century: The Sentences Commentary of Heymericus de Campo (+ 1460),” in P. J. J. M. Bakker (ed.) Chemins de la penseé médiévale: études offertes à Zénon Kaluza (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002) 513–59.

Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen Academics and Intellectual Life in the Low Countries. The University Career of Heymeric de Campo († 1460),” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 61 (1994) 173–209.

Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen Marsilius von Inghen: Bibliographie. Appendix zu der geplanten Edition der wichtigsten Werk des Marsilius von Inghen,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 31 (1989) 150–67.

Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen Nominalismus als universitäre Spekulationskontrolle,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 73 (2006) 349–74.

Fritz Hoffmann . “Der Wandel in der Scholastischen Argumentation vom 13 Zum 14 Jahrhundert aufgezeigt an zwei Beispielen: Robert Holcot und William Crathorn,” in A. Speer (ed.) Die Bibliotheca Amploniana: ihre Bedeutung im Spannungsfeld von Aristotelismus, Nominalismus und Humanismus (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995) 301–22.

Tobias Hoffmann . “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2007) 122–56.

Michael A. Hoskin and A.G. Molland . “Swineshead on Falling Bodies: An Example of Fourteenth-Century Physics,” British Journal for the History of Science 3 (1966–7) 150–82.

George Hourani . “The Principal Subject of Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 15 (1956) 40–6.

George Hourani . “Reason and Revelation in Ibn Hazm’s Ethical Thought,” in G. Hourani (ed.) Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985) 167–89.

George Hourani . Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

R. E. Houser Philosophical Development through Metaphor: Light among the Greeks,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64 (1990) 75–85.

Kevin Hughes . “The Ratio Dei and the Ambiguities of History,” Modern Theology 21 (2005) 645–61.

Henri Hugonnard-Roche . “Aux origines de l’exégèse orientale de la logique d’Aristote: Sergius de Rešʿaina († 536), médecin et philosophe,” Journal asiatique 277 (1989) 1–17.

Henri Hugonnard-Roche . “Le corpus philosophique syriaque aux VIe – VIIe siècles,” in C. D’Ancona (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 279–91.

R. W. Hunt Absoluta: The Summa of Petrus Hispanus on Priscianus Minor,” Historiographia Linguistica 2 (1975) 1–23.

Thomas Hurka . “Virtuous Act, Virtuous Dispositions,” Analysis 66 (2006) 69–76.

Isaac Husik . “Joseph Albo: The Last of the Mediaeval Jewish Philosophers,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 1 (1928–30) 61–72.

R. B. C. Huygens Bérenger de Tours, Lanfranc et Bernold de Constance,” Sacris erudiri 16 (1965) 358–77.

Katerina Ierodiakonou . “Metaphysics in the Byzantine Tradition: Eustratios of Nicaea on Universals,” Quaestio 5 (2005) 67–82.

Ruedi Imbach . “Das Centheologicon des Heymericus de Campo und die darin enthaltenen Casnus- Reminisizenzen,” Traditio 39 (1983) 466–77.

John Inglis . “Aquinas’s Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues,” Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1999) 3–27.

John Inglis . Spheres of Philosophical Inquiry and the Historiography of Medieval Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 1998).

Brad Inwood (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Tengiz Iremadze . Konzeptionen des Denkens im Neuplatonismus: zur Rezeption der proklischen Philosophie im deutschen und georgischen Mittelalter: Dietrich von Freiberg, Berthold von Moosburg, Joane Petrizi (Amsterdam: Grüner, 2004).

Isabel Iribarren . “‘Responsio secundum Thomam’ and the Search for an Early Thomistic School,” Vivarium 39 (2001) 255–96.

Terence Irwin . “Stoic Naturalism and its Critics,” in B. Inwood (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 345–64.

Yukio Iwakuma . “Influence,” in J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 305–35.

Klaus Jacobi . “Einzelnes-Individuum-Person. Gilbert von Poitier’s Philosophie des Individuellen,” in J. Aertsen and A. Speer (eds.) Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995).

Klaus Jacobi . “Peter Abelard’s Investigations into the Meaning and Function of the Speech Sign ‘Est’,” in S. Knuutila and J. Hintikka (eds.) The Logic of Being (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986) 145–80.

Danielle Jacquart . “Aristotelian Thought in Salerno,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 407–28.

T. E. James Peter Alboini of Mantua: Philosopher-Humanist,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1974) 161–70.

édouard Jeauneau . “Le commentaire de Guillaume de Lucques sur les Noms Divins,” in T. Boiadjiev et al. (eds.) Die Dionysius-Rezeption im Mittelalter (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000) 177–95.

Périclès-Pierre Joannou . “Die Definition des Seins bei Eustratios von Nikaia,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 47 (1954) 358–68.

Périclès-Pierre Joannou . “Der Nominalismus und die menschliche Psychologie Christ,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 47 (1954) 369–78.

Jean Jolivet . “The Arabic Inheritance,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 113–48.

Mark D. Jordan The Controversy of the Correctoria and the Limits of Metaphysics,” Speculum 57 (1982) 292–314.

Mark D. Jordan The Disappearance of Galen in Thirteenth-Century Philosophy and Theology,” in A. Zimmermann et al. (eds.) Mensch und Natur im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992) 703–17.

Zénon Kaluza . “La nature des écrits de Jean de Ripa,” Traditio 43 (1987) 257–98.

Karl-Hermann Kandler , Burkhard Mojsisch , and Franz-Bernhard Stammkötter (eds.). Dietrich von Freiberg: neue Perspektiven seiner Philosophie, Theologie und Naturwissenschaft (Amsterdam: Grüner, 1999).

Hermann Kantorowicz . “The Poetical Sermon of a Mediæval Jurist: Placentinus and His ‘Sermo de Legibus’,” Journal of the Warburg Institute 2 (1938) 22–41.

Georgi Kapriev . “The Modern Study of Byzantine Philosophy,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 48 (2006) 3–13.

Elizabeth Karger . “Walter Burley’s Realism,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 24–40.

Elizabeth Karger . “William of Ockham, Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham on the Objects of Knowledge and Belief,” Vivarium 33 (1995) 171–96.

Joel Kaye . Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century: Money, Market Exchange, and the Emergence of Scientific Thought (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Rondo Keele . “Can God Make a Picasso? William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Divine Power and Real Relations,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007) 395–411.

Rondo Keele . “The Logical and Scientific Treatises of John Chilmark (†1396),” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49 (2007) 119–37.

Rondo Keele . “Oxford Quodlibeta from Ockham to Holcot,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 651–92.

Rondo Keele . “The So-Called Res Theory of Walter Chatton,” Franciscan Studies 61 (2003) 37–53.

Francis E. Kelley Some Observations on the Fictum Theory in Ockham and itsRelation to Hervaeus Natalis,” Franciscan Studies 38 (1978) 260–82.

Francis E. Kelley Walter Chatton vs. Aureoli and Ockham Regarding the Universal Concept,” Franciscan Studies 41 (1981) 222–49.

Louis G. Kelly The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002).

M. S. Kempshall The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).

Leonard A. Kennedy The De anima of John Sharpe,” Franciscan Studies 29 (1969) 249–70.

Leonard A. Kennedy Mediaevalia. I. Robert Graystanes’ Commentary on the Sentences,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 53 (1986) 185–9.

Leonard A. Kennedy Robert Graystanes, O.S.B., on Essence and Existence,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 56 (1989) 102–16.

Leonard A. Kennedy and Margaret E. Romano . “John Went, O.F.M., and Divine Omnipotence,” Franciscan Studies 47 (1987) 138–70.

Anthony Kenny . “Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom,” in A. Kenny (ed.) Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969) 255–70.

Anthony Kenny and Jan Pinborg . “Medieval Philosophical Literature,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 11–42.

Bonnie Kent . “Aquinas and Weakness of Will,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007) 70–91.

Bonnie Kent . “Augustine’s Ethics,” in N. Kretzmann and E. Stump (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 205–33.

Bonnie Kent . “Evil in Later Medieval Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007) 177–205.

Muhammad Ali Khalidi (tr.). Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Peter King . “Abelard’s Intentionalist Ethics,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995) 213–31.

Peter King . “Jean Buridan’s Philosophy of Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987) 109–32.

Peter King . “Late Scholastic Theories of the Passions: Controversies in the Thomist Tradition,” in H. Lagerlund and M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.) Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002) 229–58.

Raina Kirchhoff . Die Syncategoremata des Wilhelm von Sherwood: Kommentierung und Historische Einordnung (Leiden: Brill, 2008).

Heikki Kirjavainen . “Transcendental Elements in the Semantics of Crathorn,” in G. Holmstr öm-Hintikka (ed.) Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000) 45–58.

Gyula Klima . “The Changing Role of Entia Rationis in Medieval Philosophy: A Comparative Study with a Reconstruction,” Synthese 96 (1993) 25–59.

Gyula Klima . “Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan,” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2004) 95–110.

Gyula Klima . “‘Debeo tibi equum’: A Reconstruction of the Theoretical Framework of Buridan’s Treatment of the Sophisma,” in S. Read (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 333–47.

Gyula Klima . “Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic,” in A. Hieke and E. Morscher (eds.) New Essays in Free Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001) 197–226.

Gyula Klima . “Nominalism,” in E. K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn (Boston: Elsevier, 2006) 8: 648–52.

Gyula Klima . “Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of the Categories,” in P. V. Spade (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 118–42.

Gyula Klima . “Syncategoremata,” in E. K. Brown and A. Anderson (eds.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn (Boston: Elsevier, 2006) 12: 353–6.

E.-H. Kluge Roscelin and the Medieval Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976) 405–14.

C. H. Kneepkens Erfurt, Ampl. Q.70A: A Quaestiones-Commentary on the Second Part of Alexander de Villa Dei’s Doctrinale by Marsilius of Inghen? An Explorative Note on a Specimen of Conceptualist Grammar,” Vivarium 28 (1990) 26–54.

C. H. Kneepkens Grammar and Semantics in the Twelfth Century: Petrus Helias and Gilbert de la Porrée on the Substantive Verb,” in M. Kardaun and J. Spruyt (eds.) The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L.M. de Rijk (Leiden: Brill, 2000) 237–75.

C. H. Kneepkens Master Guido and his View on Government: On Twelfth-Century Linguistic Thought,” Vivarium 16 (1978) 108–41.

C. H. Kneepkens Mulier quae Damnavit Salvavit. A Note of the Early Development of the Relatio Simplex,” Vivarium 14 (1976) 1–25.

C. H. Kneepkens The Relatio simplex in the Grammatical Tracts of the Late Twelfth and Early Thirteenth Century,” Vivarium 15 (1977) 1–30.

C. H. Kneepkens Transitivity, Intransitivity and Related Concepts in Twelfth-Century Grammar. An Explorative Study,” in G. L. Bursill-Hall et al. (eds.) De ortu Grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 161–89.

Simo Knuuttila . Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).

Simo Knuuttila . “Time and Creation in Augustine,” in N. Kretzmann and E. Stump (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 103–15.

Simo Knuuttila . “Trinitarian Sophisms in Robert Holcot’s Theology,” in S. Read (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 348–56.

Barry Kogan . “Judah Halevi and his Use of Philosophy in the Kuzari,” in D. H. Frank and O. Leaman (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 111–35.

L. A. Kosman Aristotle’s Definition of Motion,” Phronesis 14 (1969) 40–62.

Jill Kraye . “Moral Philosophy,” in C. B. Schmitt and Q. Skinner (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 303–86.

Norman Kretzmann . “Socrates is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White,” Noûs 11 (1977) 3–15.

Norman Kretzmann . “Syncategoremata, Exponibilia, Sophismata,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 211–45.

Norman Kretzmann and Eleonore Stump (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

Gerhard Krieger . “Studies on Walter Burley, 1989–1997,” Vivarium 37 (1999) 94–100.

James Kritzeck . Peter the Venerable and Islam (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964).

Taneli Kukkonen . “Averroes and the Teleological Argument,” Religious Studies 38 (2002) 405–28.

Taneli Kukkonen . “No Man Is an Island: Nature and Neo-Platonic Ethics in Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008) 187–204.

Taneli Kukkonen . “Possible Worlds in the Tahâfut al-falâsifa: Al-Ghazâlî on Creation and Contingency,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2000) 479–502.

Paul Kunitzsch . “über das Frühstadium der arabischen Aneignung antiken Gutes,” Saeculum 26 (1975) 268–82.

Henrik Lagerlund . “Pietro d’Abano and the Anatomy of Perception,” in S. Knuuttila and P. Kärkkäinen (eds.) Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008) 117–30.

Henrik Lagerlund and Mikko Yrjönsuuri (eds.). Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002).

Stephen Lahey . Philosophy and Politics in the Thought of John Wyclif (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Roberto Lambertini . “Sicut tabernarius vinum significat per circulum: Directions in Contemporary Interpretations of the Modistae,” in U. Eco and C. Marmo (eds.) On the Medieval Theories of Signs (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1989) 107–42.

John C. Lamoreaux The Biography of Theodore Abū Qurrah Revisited,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 56 (2002) 25–40.

Helen Lang . The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Place and the Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Tzvi Langermann . “Maimonides and the Sciences,” in D. H. Frank and O. Leaman (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 157–75.

Daniel J. Lasker Jewish-Christian Polemics at the Turning Point: Jewish Evidence from the Twelfth Century,” Harvard Theological Review 89 (1996) 161–73.

John Laumakis . “Aquinas’ Misinterpretation of Avicebron on the Activity of Corporeal Substances: Fons Vitae II, 9 and 10,” Modern Schoolman 81 (2004) 135–49.

Vivien Law . (ed). History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993).

Vivien Law . The History of Linguistics in Europe, from Plato to 1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

C. H. Lawrence The Letters of Adam Marsh and the Franciscan School at Oxford,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 42 (1991) 218–38.

Ewart. Lewis The ‘Positivism’ of Marsilius of Padua,” Speculum 38 (1963) 541–82.

Neil Lewis . “The First Recension of Robert Grosseteste’s De libero arbitrio,” Mediaeval Studies 53 (1991) 1–88.

Neil Lewis . “William of Auvergne’s Account of the Enuntiable: Its Relations to Nominalism and the Doctrine of the Eternal Truths,” Vivarium 33 (1995) 113–36.

P. Osmund Lewry . “Two Continuators of Aquinas: Robertus de Vulgarbia and Thomas Sutton,” Mediaeval Studies 43 (1981) 58–130.

David C. Lindberg Alhazen’s Theory of Vision and its Reception in the West,” Isis 58 (1967) 321–41.

David C. Lindberg Alkindi’s Critique of Euclid’s Theory of Vision,” Isis 62 (1971) 469–89.

David C. Lindberg Lines of Influence in Thirteenth-Century Optics: Bacon, Witelo, and Pecham,” Speculum 46 (1971) 66–83.

A. C. Lloyd Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic,” Phronesis 1 (1955–6) 58–72, 146–60.

Charles H. Lohr Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries,” Traditio 23 (1967) 314–413; 24 (1968) 194–245; 26 (1970) 135–216; 27 (1971) 251–351; 28 (1972) 281–396; 29 (1973) 93–197; 30 (1974) 119–44

A. A. Long and D. N. Sedley (tr.). The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

R. James Long . “The First Oxford Debate on the Eternity of theWorld,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 65 (1998) 54–98.

R. James Long . “The Science of Theology According to Richard Fishacre: Edition of the Prologue to his Commentary on the Sentences,” Mediaeval Studies 34 (1972) 71–98.

R. James Long and Timothy Noone . “Fishacre and Rufus on the Metaphysics of Light: Two Unedited Texts,” in J. Hamesse (ed.) Roma, magister mundi: itineraria culturae medievalis: mélanges offérts au Père L. E. Boyle à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération des instituts d’études médiévales, 1998) 517–48.

Robert Lopez . The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).

Anneli Luhtala . “A Priscian Commentary Attributed to Eriugena,” in S. Auroux (ed.) History of Linguistics 1999: Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2003) 19–30.

David. Luscombe The School of Peter Abelard: The Influence of Abelard’s Thought in the Early Scholastic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).

Loman McAodha . “The Nature and Efficacy of Preaching According to St. Bernandine of Siena,” Franciscan Studies 27 (1967) 221–47.

Enzo Maccagnolo . “David of Dinant and the Beginning of Aristotelianism in Paris,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 429–42.

John P. McCall Chaucer and John of Legnano,” Speculum 40 (1965) 484–9.

John P. McCall The Writings of John of Legnano,” Traditio 23 (1967) 415–37.

Colleen McCluskey . “The Roots of Ethical Voluntarism.” Vivarium 39 (2001) 185–208.

A. C. McDermott Materials for an Archaeological Analysis of Richard Campsall’s Logic,” in G. L. Bursill-Hall et al. (eds.) De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in Memory of Jan Pinborg (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990) 227–37.

Scott MacDonald Goodness as Transcendental: The Early Thirteenth-Century Recovery of an Aristotelian Idea,” Topoi 11 (1992) 173–86.

Jon. McGinnis Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian,” Phronesis 51 (2006) 140–61.

Jon. McGinnis Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003) 307–27.

A. S. McGrade “William of Ockham and Augustinus de Ancona on the Righteousness of Dissent,” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–7) 143–65.

John McNeill . “Medicine for Sin as Prescribed in the Penitentials,” Church History 1 (1932) 14–26.

Alfonso Maierù The Sophism ‘Omnis propositio est vera vel falsa’ by Henry Hopton (Pseudo-Heytesbury’s De veritate et falsitate propositionis,” in S. Read (ed.) Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) 103–15.

John Malcolm . “A Reconsideration of the Identity and Inherence Theories of the Copula,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979) 383–400.

William Mallard . “John Wyclif and the Tradition of Biblical Authority,” Church History 30 (1961) 50–60.

Charles Manekin . “Conservative Tendencies in Gersonides’ Religious Philosophy,” in D. H. Frank and O. Leaman (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 304–42.

William E. Mann Divine Simplicity,” Religious Studies 18 (1982) 451–71.

William E. Mann Ethics,” in J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 279–304.

John Marenbon . “Anselm Rewrites his Argument: Proslogion 2 and the Response to Gaunilo,” in J. Hamesse and O. Weijers (eds.) écriture et reéćriture des textes philosophiques médiévaux (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006) 347–65.

John Marenbon . Boethius (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

John Marenbon . (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

John Marenbon . From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre: Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

John Marenbon . “Gilbert of Poitiers,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 328–52.

John Marenbon . “Glosses and Commentaries on the Categories and De interpretatione before Abelard,” in J. Fried (ed.) Dialektik und Rhetorik im früheren und hohen Mittelalter, Schriften des historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 27 (Munich: Historisches Kolleg, 1997) 21–49.

John Marenbon . Later Medieval Philosophy (1150–1350): An Introduction (London: Routledge, 1987).

John Marenbon . “The Latin Tradition of Logic to 1100,” in D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.) Handbook to the History of Logic, vol. II: Medieval and Renaissance Logic (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2008) 1–63.

John Marenbon . “A Note on the Porretani,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 353–7.

John Marenbon . The Philosophy of Peter Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Michael E. Marmura Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context,” The Monist 69 (1986) 383–95.

Michael E. Marmura Ghazalian Causes and Intermediaries,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 115 (1995) 89–100.

Michael Marmura and John M. Rist. Al-Kindi’s Discussion of Divine Existence and Oneness,” Mediaeval Studies 25 (1963) 338–52.

Steven P. Marrone William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste: New Ideas of Truth in the Early Thirteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).

Christopher J. Martin Logic,” in J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 158–99.

Christopher J. Martin The Logic of Negation in Boethius,” Phronesis 36 (1991) 277–304.

Christopher J. Martin The Logic of the Nominales, or, The Rise and Fall of Impossible Positio,” Vivarium 30 (1987) 110–26.

Christopher J. Martin Obligations and Liars,” in M. Yrjönsuuri (ed.) Medieval Formal Logic: Consequences, Obligations, Insolubles (Dordrecht: Reidel, 2001) 63–94.

Christopher J. Martin Self-Knowledge and Cognitive Ascent: Thomas Aquinas and Peter Olivi on the KK-Thesis,” in H. Lagerlund (ed.) Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007) 93–108.

Christopher J. Martin William’s Machine,” Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986) 564–72.

C. F. J. Martin On aMistake Commonly Made in Accounts of Sixteenth-Century Discussions of the Immortality of the Soul,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1995) 29–37.

John H. Martin The Eucharistic Treatise of John Quidort of Paris,” Viator 6 (1975) 214–40.

John H. Martin Inventing Sincerity, Refashioning Prudence: The Discovery of the Individual in Renaissance Europe,” American Historical Review 102 (1997) 1309–42.

Gareth B. Matthews Augustine (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).

Armand Maurer . “The De quidditatibus entium of Dietrich of Freiberg and its Criticism of Thomistic Metaphysics,” Mediaeval Studies 18 (1956) 173–203.

Armand Maurer . “Henry of Harclay’s Question on the Univocity of Being,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 1–18.

Armand Maurer . “John of Jandun and the Divine Causality,” Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955) 185–207; repr. in Being and Knowing (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990) 275–308.

Armand Maurer . “Ockham’s Razor and Chatton’s Anti-Razor,” Mediaeval Studies 46 (1984) 463–75.

Armand Maurer . “The Role of Infinity in the Thought of Francis of Meyronnes,” Mediaeval Studies 33 (1971) 201–27; repr. in Being and Knowing (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1990) 333–59.

Gerhard. May Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: Die Entstehung der Lehre von der Creatio ex nihilo (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978).

Stephen. Menn Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Stephen. Menn Al-FārābĪ’s Kitāb al-ḥurūf and his Analysis of the Senses of Being,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 18 (2008) 59–97.

Albert D. Menut A Provisional Bibliography of Oresme’s Writings,” Mediaeval Studies 28 (1966) 279–99.

Christia Mercer . Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

Philip. Merlan Monopsychism, Mysticism, and Metaconsciousness (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963).

Constant Mews . Abelard and Heloise (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Constant Mews . “Nominalism and Theology before Abaelard: New Light on Roscelin of Compiègne,” Vivarium 30 (1992) 4–33.

Emily Michael . “John Wyclif on Body and Mind,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2003) 343–60.

Jean Michot . “La pandémie avicennienne,” Arabica 40 (1993) 287–344.

Jürgen Miethke . “Literaturbericht über Marsilius von Padua (1958–1992),” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 35 (1993) 150–65.

Jürgen Miethke . “Papst, Ortsbischof und Universität in den Pariser Theologenprozessen des 13. Jahrhunderts,” in A. Zimmermann (ed.) Die Auseinandersetzungen an der Pariser Universität im XIII. Jahrhundert (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1976) 52–94.

Jürgen Miethke . Ockhams Weg zur Sozialphilosophie (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969).

Lorenzo Minio-Paluello . “Jacobus Veneticus Graecus, Canonist and Translator of Aristotle,” Traditio 8 (1952) 265–304.

Christian Moevs . The Metaphysics of Dante’s Comedy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005).

A. George Molland . “An Examination of Bradwardine’s Geometry,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19 (1978) 113–75.

Arthur Monahan . “The Subject of Metaphysics for Peter of Auvergne,” Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954) 118–30.

Ernest A. Moody Galileo and Avempace: The Dynamics of the Leaning Tower Experiment,” Journal for the History of Ideas 12 (1951) 163–93, 375–422.

Ernest A. Moody A Quodlibetal Question of Robert Holcot, O.P. on the Problem of the Objects of Knowledge and of Belief,” Speculum 39 (1964), 53–74.

Lawrence Moonan . Divine Power: The Medieval Power Distinction up to its Adoption by Albert, Bonaventure, and Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

Lawrence Moonan . “Impossibility and Peter Damian,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980) 146–63.

Caroline Mooney . Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).

Dermot Moran . The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena: A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

Franco Morenzoni and Jean-Yves Tilliette (eds.). Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne (+1249) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2005).

J. T. Muckle Greek Works Translated into Latin before 1350,” Mediaeval Studies 4 (1942) 33–42; 5 (1943) 102–14.

J. T. Muckle Utrum Theologia sit scientia. A Quodlibetal Question of Robert Holcot, O.P.,” Mediaeval Studies 20 (1958) 127–53.

Sigrid Müller . “The Ethics of John Capreolus and the Nominales,” Verbum: Analecta Neolatina 6 (2004) 301–14.

Sigrid Müller . “Sprache,Wirklichkeit und Allmacht Gottes: das Bild der via moderna bei Johannes Capreolus (1380–1444) und seine Bedeutung für die Schulbildung im 15. Jahrhundert,” in J. Aertsen and M. Pickavé (eds.) Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004) 157–72.

Wolfgang Müller . “Huguccio of Pisa: Canonist, Bishop, and Grammarian?,” Viator 22 (1991) 121–52.

Angel Muñoz García . “Albert of Saxony, Bibliography,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 32 (1990) 161–90.

John Murdoch . “From Social to Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning,” in J. Murdoch and E. Sylla (eds.) The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975) 271–348.

Claudia Eisen Murphy . “Aquinas on our Responsibility for our Emotions,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999) 163–205.

Alexander Murray . “Confession before 1215,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 3 (1993) 51–81.

John Courtney Murray . “Remarks on the Moral Problem of War,” Theological Studies 20 (1959) 40–61.

Cary J. Nederman Kings, Peers and Parliament: Virtue and Corulership in Walter Burley’s Commentarius in VIII Libros Politicorum Aristotelis,” Albion 24 (1992) 391–407.

Cary J Nederman . and Mary E. Sullivan . “Reading Aristotle through Rome: Republicanism and History in Ptolemy of Lucca’s De regimine principum,” European Journal of Political Theory 7 (2008) 223–40.

Paul Needham . “Duhem’s Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002) 685–708.

Richard Newhauser . The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Richard Newhauser . (ed.). The Seven Deadly Sins: From Communities to Individuals (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Barbara Newman . God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003).

Barbara Newman . “Hildegard and her Hagiographers” in C. Mooney (ed.) Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999) 16–34.

William R. Newman Atoms and Alchemy: Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Lauge O. Nielsen The Debate between Peter Auriol and Thomas Wylton on Theology and Virtue,” Vivarium 38 (2000) 35–98.

Lauge O. Nielsen The Intelligibility of Faith and the Nature of Theology: Peter Auriole’s Theological Programme,” Studia Theologica 53 (1999) 26–39.

Lauge O. Nielsen The Quodlibet of Peter Auriol,” in C. Schabel (ed.) Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 267–331.

Timothy Noone . “Alnwick on the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Formal Distinction,” Franciscan Studies 53 (1993) 231–61.