Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:37:12.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Dietary analysis I: Food physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Peter W. Lucas
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Daniel Osorio
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Nayuta Yamashita
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Jonathan F. Prinz
Affiliation:
Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences
Nathaniel J. Dominy
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Brian W. Darvell
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Joanna M. Setchell
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Deborah J. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Both this chapter and the next focus on measurements of the physical and chemical attributes of potential foods that primates select or reject. The major reason for analysing the diets of primate in this manner is to understand the basis for their food choice. Observing primates as they feed quickly raises questions in the observer's mind about the possible foraging strategies that the animals might be following in order to survive. How do primates distinguish food from what is otherwise scenery? Can we measure the attributes of potential foods in the form that primates are actually sensing them? What do primates get out of the foods they choose and are their choices, based on sensory capabilities, optimal in terms of nutrients? Tests of hypotheses that address these questions will require objective dietary analysis. It is important to tailor your measurements to the questions being asked.

The physiochemical characteristics of foods may form important sensory cues for their detection, selection and subsequent processing by primates, but all these characteristics are affected to some degree by specimen storage. Physical characteristics, such as colour, geometry and mechanical properties, are ruined. So it is often important and sometimes vital to make measurements almost immediately, while the specimen is fresh. The alternative of drying specimens for later chemical analysis not only involves a substantial time lag between fieldwork and subsequent access to a laboratory but also can lead to inaccurate results.

Type
Chapter
Information
Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
, pp. 184 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altshuler, D. L. (2001).Ultraviolet reflectance in fruits, ambient light composition, and fruit removal in a tropical forest. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 767–78Google Scholar
Ashby, M. F. & Gibson, L. J. (1997). Cellular Solids Structure and Properties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ashby, M. F. & Jones, D. R. H. (1996). Engineering Materials 1, 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth Heineman
Ashby, M. F. & Jones, D. R. H. (1998). Engineering Materials 2, 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth Heineman
Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C. & Norris, K. J. (1994).Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color. Am. Nat. 144, 848–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boubli, J. P. (1999).Feeding ecology of black-headed uacaris (Cacajao melanocephalus melanocephalus) in Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. Int. J. Primatol. 20, 719–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvell, B. W., Lee, P. K. D., Yuen, T. D. B. & Lucas, P. W. (1996).A portable fracture toughness tester for biological materials. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7, 954–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominy, N. J. (2003). Color as an indicator of food quality to anthropoid primates: ecological evidence and an evolutionary scenario. In Anthropoid Origins, ed. C. R. Ross & R. F. Kay. New York: Kluwer Academic, in press
Dominy, N. J., Lucas, P. W., Osorio, D. & Yamashita, N. (2001). The sensory ecology of primate food perception. Evol. Anthropol. 10, 171–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, T. A. & Ennos, A. R. (2000). Mechanical testing of the abrasiveness of grass leaves. In Plant Biomechanics 2000, ed. H.-C. Spatz & T. Speck, pp. 535–40. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag
Hill, D. A., Lucas, P. W. & Cheng, P. Y. (1995).Bite forces used by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui) on Yakushima Island, Japan, to open aphid-induced galls on Distylium racemosum. J. Zool. 237, 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M. & Osorio, D. (2003).Animal colour vision – behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol. Rev., 87, 81–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, K. (1994).Adhesion: molecules and mechanics. Science 263, 1720–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinzey, W. G. & Norconk, M. A. (1993).Physical and chemical properties of fruit and seeds eaten by Pithecia and Chiropotes in Surinam and Venezuela. Int. J. Primatol. 14, 207–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintilhac, P. M., Wei, C., Tanguay, J. J. & Outwater, J. O. (2000).Ball tonometry: a rapid, non-destructive method for measuring cell turgor pressure in thin-walled plant cells. J. Plant Growth Reg. 19, 90–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W. & Teaford, M. F. (1995).Significance of silica in leaves eaten by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Folia Primatol. 64, 30–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Peters, C. R. & Arrandale, S. (1994).Seed-breaking forces exerted by orang-utans with their teeth in captivity and a new technique for estimating forces produced in the wild. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94, 365–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Darvell, B. W., Lee, P. K. D., Yuen, T. D. B. & Choong, M. F. (1998).Colour cues for leaf food selection by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) with a new suggestion for the evolution of trichromatic colour vision. Folia Primatol. 69, 139–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, P. W., Turner, I. M., Dominy, N. J. & Yamashita, N. (2000).Mechanical defences to herbivory. Ann. Bot. 86, 913–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Beta, T., Darvell, B. W., Dominy, N. J., Essackjee, H. C., Lee, P. K. D., Osorio, D., Ramsden, L., Yamashita, N. & Yuen, T. D. B. (2001).Field kit to characterize physical, chemical and spatial aspects of potential foods of primates. Folia Primatol. 72, 11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, D. I. A. & Boynton, R. M. (1979).Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1183–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. D. (1990). Primate Origins and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Osorio, D. & Vorobyev, M. (1996).Colour-vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Series B, 26, 593–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overdorff, D. J. & Strait, S. G. (1998).Seed handling by three prosimian primates in southeastern Madagascar: Implications for seed dispersal. Am. J. Primatol. 45, 69–823.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrága, C. A., Troscianko, T. & Tolhurst, D. J. (2002).Spatio-chromatic properties of natural images and human vision. Curr. Biol. 12, 483–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. F. & Lucas, P. W. (2000).Saliva tannin interactions. J. Oral Rehabil. 27, 991–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Vienot, F., Charles-Dominique, P. & Mollon, J. D. (2001).Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 229–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, V. C. & Pokorny, J. (1972).Spectral sensitivity of colorblind observers and the cone pigments. Vis. Res. 12, 2059–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. F. V. (1992). Biomaterials – A Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press
Wilsea, M., Johnson, K. L. & Ashby, M. F. (1975).Indentation of foamed plastics. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 17, 457–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysecki, G. & Stiles, W. S. (2000). Color Science. New York: John Wiley
Yamashita, N. (1996).Seasonality and site specificity of mechanical dietary patterns in two Malagasy lemur families (Lemuridae and Indriidae). Int. J. Primatol. 17, 355–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, N. (2000). Mechanical thresholds as a criterion for food selection in two prosimian species. In Plant Biomechanics 2000, ed. H.-C. Spatz & T. Speck, pp. 590–5. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×