Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T01:40:49.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Survey and census methods: population distribution and density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Caroline Ross
Affiliation:
University of Surrey Roehampton
Nigel Reeve
Affiliation:
University of Surrey Roehampton
Joanna M. Setchell
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Deborah J. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A population study of a wild primate typically involves a considerable investment of time and resources (i.e. money, equipment, labour) and it is vital to ensure that such effort is well targeted. When designing your study, a key issue is whether your study objectives genuinely demand an absolute estimate of the population density from either a census (a total count) or a survey (in which density is estimated from statistically valid samples), or whether less information will suffice. Relative estimates of density using data from methods such as ‘catch-per-unit effort’ from trapping or systematic searching do not provide absolute densities but, as long as the sampling methods and other conditions are standardised, can allow reliable comparisons between locations and monitoring of population change over time. Population indices are based on indirect indicators, such as the density of faeces or other characteristic signs, that can be correlated with population density. Such methods may be a more practical alternative to searching for secretive, hard-to-find animals.

In practice, no population survey or census is completely bias free and many studies may find that a reliable relative population estimate or index is more achievable than a reliable absolute estimate of the population size (Bibby et al., 1992; Greenwood, 1996; Krebs, 1999). There is a trade-off between the depth of the data gathered and the number of replicate samples that can be obtained.

Type
Chapter
Information
Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
, pp. 90 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. R., Laake, J. L., Crain, B. R. & Burnham, K. P. (1979). Guidelines for line transect sampling of biological populations. J. Wildlife Manag. 34, 141–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. & Crain, B. R. (1985). Estimating population size and density using line transect sampling. Biom. J. 7, 723–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begon, M. (1979). Investigating Animal Abundance, Capture–Recapture for Biologists. London: Edward Arnold
Bibby, C. J. & Buckland, S. T. (1987). Bias of bird census results due to detectability varying with habitat. Acta Ecol. 8, 103–12Google Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D. & Hill, D. A. (1992). Bird Census Techniques. London: Academic Press
Blom, A., Almasi, A., Heitkonig, I. M. A., Kpanou, J. B. & Prins, H. H. T. (2001). A survey of the apes in the Dzanga-Ndoki National Park, Central African Republic: a comparison between the census and survey methods of estimating the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) nest group density. Afr. J. Ecol. 39, 98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollinger, E. K., Gavin, T. A. & McIntyre, D. C. (1988). Comparison of transects and circular-plots for estimating bobolink densities. J. Wildlife Manag 52, 777–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockelman, W. Y. & Ali, R. (1987). Methods of surveying and sampling forest primate populations. In Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rain Forest ed. C. W. Marsh & R. A. Mittermeier, pp. 23–62. New York: Alan, R. Liss
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. & Laake, J. L. (1993). Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. London: Chapman & Hall
Buckland, S. T., Goudie, I. B. J. & Borchers, D. L. (2000). Wildlife population assessment: past developments and future directions. Biometrics 56, 1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L. & Thomas, L (2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Charles-Dominique, P. (1972). Écologie et vie sociale de Galago demidovii (Fischer 1808, Prosimii). Z. TierpsycholSuppl. 9, 7–41Google Scholar
Charles-Dominique, P. (1977). Ecology and Behaviour of Nocturnal Primates. London: Duckworth
Edwards, A. & White, L. (2000). Maps, compasses, GPS units and principles of navigation. In Conservation Research in African Rain Forests: A Technical Handbook, ed. L. White & A. Edwards, pp. 31–51. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society
Fashing, P. J. & Cords, M. (2000). Diurnal primate densities and biomass in the Kakamega Forest: an evaluation of census methods and a comparison with other forests. Am. J. Primatol. 50, 139–523.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossey, D. (1974). Observation on the home range of one group of mountain gorillas. Gorilla gorilla beringei. Anim. Behav 22, 568–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossey, D. & Harcourt, A. H. (1977). Feeding ecology of free-ranging mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei). In Feeding Ecology, ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock, pp. 415–47. London: Academic PressCrossRef
Furuichi, T., Hashimoto, C. & Tashiro, Y. (2001). Extended application of a marked-nest census method to examine seasonal changes in habitat use by chimpanzees. Int. J. Primatol 22, 913–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, D. L., Underwood, H. B. & Porter, W. F. (1995). Use of modern infrared thermography for wildlife population surveys. Environ. Manag. 19, 233–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, R. M. A., Thomas, M. L. & Stocker, D. (1997). The use of portable thermal imaging for estimating deer population density in forest habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 1273–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. J. D. (1996). Basic techniques. In Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, ed. W. J. Sutherland, pp. 11–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Harcourt, A. H., Fossey, D. & Sabater Pi, J. (1981). Demography of Gorilla gorilla. J. Zool. Lond. 195, 215–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, A. H., Kineman, J. & Campbell, G. (1983). Conservation of the Virunga gorilla population. Afr. J. Ecol. 21, 139–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, C. (1995). Population census of the chimpanzees in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda: comparison between methods with nest counts. Primates 36, 477–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havens, K. J. & E. J. Sharp. (1998). Using thermal imagery in the aerial survey of animals. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 26, 17–23Google Scholar
Hubbs, A. H., Karels, T. & Boonstra, R. (2000). Indices of population size for burrowing mammals. J. Wildlife Manag. 64, 296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. J. (1999). Ecological Methodology, 2nd edition. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Longman
McGraw, W. S. (1998). Three monkeys nearing extinction in the forest reserves of eastern Côte d'Ivoire. Oryx 32, 233–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeilage, A., Plumtre, A. J., Brock–Doyle, A. & Vedder, A. (2001). Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: Gorilla census, 1997. Oryx 35, 39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. D. & M. J. Conroy (1996). Techniques for estimating abundance and species richness. In Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals, ed. D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran &. M. S. Foster, pp. 177–234. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press
Parnell, R. J. (2000). Information from animal tracks and trails. In Conservation Research in African Rain Forests: A Technical Handbook, ed. L. White & A. Edwards, pp. 157–89. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society
Payne, J. (1987). Surveying orang-utan populations by counting nests from a helicopter: a pilot survey in Sabah. Primate Cons. 8, 92–103Google Scholar
Schaller, G. B. (1963). The Mountain Gorilla: Ecology and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Sholley, C. R. (1991). Conserving gorillas in the midst of guerillas. In American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums, Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 30–7
Singh, M., Lindburg, D. G., Udhayan, A., Kumar, M. A. & Kumara, H. N. (1999). Status survey of slender loris Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus in Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India. Oryx 33, 31–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. & Henderson, P. A. (2000). Ecological Methods, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science
Thomas, L., Laake, J. L., Derry, J. F., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Marques, F. F. C., Pollard, J. H. & Fewster, R. M. (1998). Distance 3.5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment. St Andrews. University of St Andrews
Tutin, C. E. G. & Fernandez, M. (1984). Nationwide census of gorilla (Gorilla g. gorilla) and chimpanzee (Pan t. troglodytes) populations in Gabon. Am. J. Primatol. 6, 313–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutin, C. E. G., Parnell, R. J., White, L. J. T. & Fernandez, M. (1995). Nest building by lowland gorillas in Lope Reserve, Gabon: environmental influences and implications for censusing. Int. J. Primatol 16, 53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krunkelsven, E., Inogwabini, B.-I. & Draulans, D. (2000). A survey of bonobos and other large mammals in Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. Oryx 34, 180–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmer, C., Kunz, T. H., Lundie–Jenkins, G. & McShea, W. J. (1996). Mammalian signs. In Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals, ed. D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran &. M. S. Foster, pp. 157–76. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press
White, L. & Edwards, A. (2000). Methods for assessing the status of animal populations. In Conservation Research in African Rain Forests: A Technical Handbook, ed. L. White & A. Edwards, pp. 225–73. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×