Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T10:34:05.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Global Positioning System, Geographical Information Systems and Remote Sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Karel Hughes
Edited by
Joanna M. Setchell  and
Deborah J. Curtis
Karel Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Surrey Roehampton
Joanna M. Setchell
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Deborah J. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and the Global Positioning System (GPS) are powerful tools that enable ecologists to acquire, store, analyse and display spatial ecological data (Dominy & Duncan, 2001), whereas remote sensing can provide information unobtainable by traditional methods. Although there has been an exponential rise in the use of this technology-based synergism for spatial analyses, mapping and modelling in the ecological and plant sciences (Du Puy & Moat, 1998; Dale, 1999; Wadsworth & Treweek, 1999), there have been few, fully integrative applications by primatologists (but see Table 4.1). Applications relevant to primatologists include: vegetation classification and mapping; forest fragmentation assessment; biomass estimation; population viability analyses; animal censusing; habitat sensitivity/vulnerability mapping and analysis; location and delimitation of protected areas; radio-tracking/foraging patterns and cost–distance analyses; and nesting pattern analysis.

In remote areas, where species and habitat information is limited, predictive modelling within a GIS can be a useful precursor to fieldwork (Lenton et al., 2000), and integrating remotely sensed imagery can enhance such models. This is particularly useful in areas such as Central Africa where political instability and boundary conflicts may significantly influence fieldwork decisions: satellite sensors can safely gather data across national boundaries. The use of remotely sensed imagery is particularly appropriate if suitable maps are not available.

Type
Chapter
Information
Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 57 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, P., Foody, G. M., Curran, P. J. & Boyd, D. (2000). Assessing the ground data requirements for regional-scale remote sensing of tropical forest biophysical properties. Int. J. Remote Sen. 21, 2571–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzter, H. (2001). Forest mapping and monitoring with interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). Progr. Phys. Geog. 25, 159–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, G. A. & Milton, E. J. (1995). Ecology through spectrometry: the detection and classification of canopy gaps in deciduous woodlands. In TERRA-2 Understandingthe Terrestrial Environment: Remote Sensing Data Systems and Networks, ed. P. M. Mather, pp. 175–87. Chichester: Wiley
Blackburn, G. A. & Milton, E. J. (1996b). Filling the gaps: remote sensing meets woodland ecology. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5, 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlman, S. A., Adams, J. B., Smith, R. O. & Peterson, D. L. (1998). Seasonal foliage changes in the eastern Amazon Basin detected from Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite images. Biotropica 30, 376–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, F. (2001). Methods to assess tropical rain forest canopy structure: an overview. Plant Ecol. 153, 263–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. S., Foody, G. M. & Curran, P. J. (1999). The relationship between the biomass of Cameroonian tropical forests and radiation reflected in middle infrared wavelengths (3.0–5.0μm). Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 1017–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castel, T., Guerra, F., Caraglio, Y. & Houllier, F. (2002). Retrieval biomass of a large Venezuelan pine plantation using JERS-1 SAR data. Analysis of forest structure impact on radar signature. Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, P. J. (2001). Remote sensing: using the spatial domain. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 8, 331–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. R. T. (1999). Spatial Patterns Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dominy, N. J. & Duncan, B. (2001). GPS and GIS methods in an African rain forest: applications to tropical ecology and conservation. Conserv. Ecol. 5 [online] URL: <www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art6>
Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Clark, B., Knox, R. G., Blair, J. B., Hofton, M. A., Chazdon, R. L., Weishampel, J. F. & Prince, S. D. (2002). Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint LIDAR, Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 305–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Puy, D. J. & Moat, J. F. (1998). Vegetation mapping and classification in Madagascar (using GIS): implications and recommendations for the conservation of biodiversity. In The Ecology, Chronology and Taxonomy of the African and Madagascan Floras, ed. D. F. Cutler, C. R. Huxley & J. M. Lock, pp. 97–117. Proceedings of the Frank White Memorial Symposium, Kew Bulletin Additional Series. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens
Dubayah, R. O. & Drake, J. B. (2000). Lidar remote sensing for forestry. J. Forest. 98, 44–6Google Scholar
ESSP (2001). VCL: The vegetation canopy Lidar mission. <http://essp.gsfc.nasa.gov/vcl/>
Freeman, P. H. & Fox, R. (1994). Satellite Mapping of Tropical Forest Cover and Deforestation: A Review with Recommendations for USAID. Arlington, VA: Environment and Natural Resources Information Center, DATEX
Gillespie, T. W. (2001). Remote sensing of animalsProgr. Phys. Geog. 25, 355–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, D. J., Lefsky, M. A., Parker, G. G. & Blair, J. B. (2001). Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 76, 283–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, D. H. & Quinones, M. J. (2000). Land cover type and biomass classification using AirSAR data for evaluation of monitoring scenarios in the Colombian Amazon. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote 38, 685–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, P. K., Singh, S., Agarwal, S. & Roy, P. S. (2001). Forest cover assessment in western Himalayas, Himachal Pradesh using IRS 1C/1D WiFS data. Curr. Sci. India 80, 941–7Google Scholar
Lenton, S. M., Fa, J. E. & Del Val, J. P. (2000). A simple non-parametric GIS model for predicting species distribution: endemic birds in Bioko Island, West Africa. Biodivers. and Conserv. 9, 869–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, M. D. (2001). Plants in the forest canopy: some reflections on current research and future direction. Plant Ecol. 153, 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Beta, T., Darvell, B. W., Dominy, N. J., Essackjee, H. C., Lee, P. K. D., Osorio, D., Yamashita, N. & Yuen, T. D. B. (2001). Field kit to characterize physical, chemical, and spatial aspects of potential primate foods. Folia Primatol. 72, 11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. M., Honzak, M., Curran, P. J., Foody, G. M., Milne, R., Brown, T. & Amaral, S. (2000). Mapping the regional extent of tropical forest regeneration stages in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using NOAA AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 2855–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, J. M., Beaudoin, A., Durand, P., Toan, T. &.Stach, N. (2000). Airborne radar scatterometer for estimation of stand heights. Can. J. Forest Res. 30, 1983–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, E. J. (2001). Methods in Field Spectroscopy. <http://www.soton.ac.uk/∼epfs/methods/spectroscopy.shtml
Ostro, L. E. T., Young, T. P., Siver, S. C. &.Koontz, F. W. (1999). A geographic information system method for estimating home range size. J. Wildlife. Man. 63, 748–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C. (1990). Into the woods with GPS. GPS World 1, 31–6Google Scholar
Phillips, K. A., Elvey, C. R. & Abercrombie, C. L. (1998). Applying GPS to the study of primate ecology: a useful tool?Am. J. Primatol. 46, 167–723.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, S. E. (2000). Perspectives on combining ecological process models and remotely sensed data. Ecol. Model. 129, 169–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reybenayas, J. M. & Pope, K. O. (1995). Landscape ecology and diversity patterns in the seasonal tropics from Landsat TM imagery. Ecol. Appl. 5, 386–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riera, B., Philippe, M., Dosso, M., Bernard, R., Vidalmadjar, D. & Dechambre, M. (1994). Study of the ground vegetation system in the Guiana tropical rain-forest with scatterometer in a nadir looking mode. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 49, 357–77Google Scholar
Saatchi, S., Agosti, D., Alger, K., Delabie, J. & Musinsky, J. (2001). Examining fragmentation and loss of primary forest in the southern Bahian Atlantic forest of Brazil with radar imagery. Conserv. Biol. 15, 867–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, P. H., Mohammed, G. H., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Miller, J. R., Noland, T. L., Irving, D., Treitz, P. M., Colombo, S. J. & Freemantle, J. (2000). The bioindicators of forest condition project: a physiological, remote sensing approach. Forestry Chron. 76, 941–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, P. H., Treitz, P. M. & Mohammed, G. H. (2001). Remote sensing of forest condition in tolerant hardwoods: an examination of spatial scale, structure and function. Can. J. Remote Sens. 27, 232–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. P., Horning, N. & Moore, D. (1997). Regional biodiversity planning and lemur conservation in western Madagascar. Conserv. Biol. 11, 498-512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, S., Suga, Y., Oguro, Y. & Konishi, T. (2000). Monitoring of new plantation development in tropical rain forests using JERS-1 SAR data. Adv. Space Res. 26, 1151–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teillet, P., Dtaenz, M. K. & Williams, D. J. (1997). Effects of spectral, spatial and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions. Remote Sens. Environ. 61, 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thenkabail, P. S. (1999). Characterization of the alternative to slash-and-burn benchmark research area representing the Congolese rainforests of Africa using SPOT HRV data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 839–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. P., Cohen, W. B., Kennedy, R. E., Fassnacht, K. S. & Briggs, J. M. (1999). Relationship between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites. Remote Sens. Environ. 70, 52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velazquez, A., Romero, F. J., Rangel-Cordero, H. & Heil, G. W. (2001). Effects of landscape changes on mammalian assemblages at Izta-Popo volcanoes, Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 1059–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, R. & Treweek, J. (1999). GIS for Ecology: An Introduction Harlow: Longman Ltd.
Wilkie, D. S. & Finn, J. Y. (1996). Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring: A Guide for First-Time Users. New York: Columbia University Press
Wulder, M. A. (1998). The prediction of leaf area index from forest polygons decomposed through the integration of remote sensing, GIS, UNIX and C. Comput. Geosci. 24, 151–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×