The Global Positioning System, Geographical Information Systems and Remote Sensing

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139165105.006

4 - The Global Positioning System, Geographical Information Systems and Remote Sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Karel Hughes

Edited by

Joanna M. Setchell and

Deborah J. Curtis

Show author details

Karel Hughes: Affiliation:
University of Surrey Roehampton
Joanna M. Setchell: Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Deborah J. Curtis: Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and the Global Positioning System (GPS) are powerful tools that enable ecologists to acquire, store, analyse and display spatial ecological data (Dominy & Duncan, 2001), whereas remote sensing can provide information unobtainable by traditional methods. Although there has been an exponential rise in the use of this technology-based synergism for spatial analyses, mapping and modelling in the ecological and plant sciences (Du Puy & Moat, 1998; Dale, 1999; Wadsworth & Treweek, 1999), there have been few, fully integrative applications by primatologists (but see Table 4.1). Applications relevant to primatologists include: vegetation classification and mapping; forest fragmentation assessment; biomass estimation; population viability analyses; animal censusing; habitat sensitivity/vulnerability mapping and analysis; location and delimitation of protected areas; radio-tracking/foraging patterns and cost–distance analyses; and nesting pattern analysis.

In remote areas, where species and habitat information is limited, predictive modelling within a GIS can be a useful precursor to fieldwork (Lenton et al., 2000), and integrating remotely sensed imagery can enhance such models. This is particularly useful in areas such as Central Africa where political instability and boundary conflicts may significantly influence fieldwork decisions: satellite sensors can safely gather data across national boundaries. The use of remotely sensed imagery is particularly appropriate if suitable maps are not available.

Type: Chapter
Information: Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
, pp. 57 - 73

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165105.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atkinson, P., Foody, G. M., Curran, P. J. & Boyd, D. (2000). Assessing the ground data requirements for regional-scale remote sensing of tropical forest biophysical properties. Int. J. Remote Sen. 21, 2571–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Balzter, H. (2001). Forest mapping and monitoring with interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). Progr. Phys. Geog. 25, 159–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Blackburn, G. A. & Milton, E. J. (1995). Ecology through spectrometry: the detection and classification of canopy gaps in deciduous woodlands. In TERRA-2 Understandingthe Terrestrial Environment: Remote Sensing Data Systems and Networks, ed. P. M. Mather, pp. 175–87. Chichester: Wiley

Blackburn, G. A. & Milton, E. J. (1996b). Filling the gaps: remote sensing meets woodland ecology. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5, 175–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Bohlman, S. A., Adams, J. B., Smith, R. O. & Peterson, D. L. (1998). Seasonal foliage changes in the eastern Amazon Basin detected from Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite images. Biotropica 30, 376–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Bongers, F. (2001). Methods to assess tropical rain forest canopy structure: an overview. Plant Ecol. 153, 263–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyd, D. S., Foody, G. M. & Curran, P. J. (1999). The relationship between the biomass of Cameroonian tropical forests and radiation reflected in middle infrared wavelengths (3.0–5.0μm). Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 1017–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Castel, T., Guerra, F., Caraglio, Y. & Houllier, F. (2002). Retrieval biomass of a large Venezuelan pine plantation using JERS-1 SAR data. Analysis of forest structure impact on radar signature. Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 30–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Curran, P. J. (2001). Remote sensing: using the spatial domain. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 8, 331–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Dale, M. R. T. (1999). Spatial Patterns Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dominy, N. J. & Duncan, B. (2001). GPS and GIS methods in an African rain forest: applications to tropical ecology and conservation. Conserv. Ecol. 5 [online] URL: <www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art6>

Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Clark, B., Knox, R. G., Blair, J. B., Hofton, M. A., Chazdon, R. L., Weishampel, J. F. & Prince, S. D. (2002). Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint LIDAR, Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 305–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Du Puy, D. J. & Moat, J. F. (1998). Vegetation mapping and classification in Madagascar (using GIS): implications and recommendations for the conservation of biodiversity. In The Ecology, Chronology and Taxonomy of the African and Madagascan Floras, ed. D. F. Cutler, C. R. Huxley & J. M. Lock, pp. 97–117. Proceedings of the Frank White Memorial Symposium, Kew Bulletin Additional Series. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens

Dubayah, R. O. & Drake, J. B. (2000). Lidar remote sensing for forestry. J. Forest. 98, 44–6Google Scholar

ESSP (2001). VCL: The vegetation canopy Lidar mission. <http://essp.gsfc.nasa.gov/vcl/>

Freeman, P. H. & Fox, R. (1994). Satellite Mapping of Tropical Forest Cover and Deforestation: A Review with Recommendations for USAID. Arlington, VA: Environment and Natural Resources Information Center, DATEX

Gillespie, T. W. (2001). Remote sensing of animalsProgr. Phys. Geog. 25, 355–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Harding, D. J., Lefsky, M. A., Parker, G. G. & Blair, J. B. (2001). Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 76, 283–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoekman, D. H. & Quinones, M. J. (2000). Land cover type and biomass classification using AirSAR data for evaluation of monitoring scenarios in the Colombian Amazon. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote 38, 685–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Joshi, P. K., Singh, S., Agarwal, S. & Roy, P. S. (2001). Forest cover assessment in western Himalayas, Himachal Pradesh using IRS 1C/1D WiFS data. Curr. Sci. India 80, 941–7Google Scholar

Lenton, S. M., Fa, J. E. & Del Val, J. P. (2000). A simple non-parametric GIS model for predicting species distribution: endemic birds in Bioko Island, West Africa. Biodivers. and Conserv. 9, 869–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowman, M. D. (2001). Plants in the forest canopy: some reflections on current research and future direction. Plant Ecol. 153, 39–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Lucas, P. W., Beta, T., Darvell, B. W., Dominy, N. J., Essackjee, H. C., Lee, P. K. D., Osorio, D., Yamashita, N. & Yuen, T. D. B. (2001). Field kit to characterize physical, chemical, and spatial aspects of potential primate foods. Folia Primatol. 72, 11–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Lucas, R. M., Honzak, M., Curran, P. J., Foody, G. M., Milne, R., Brown, T. & Amaral, S. (2000). Mapping the regional extent of tropical forest regeneration stages in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using NOAA AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 2855–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Martinez, J. M., Beaudoin, A., Durand, P., Toan, T. &.Stach, N. (2000). Airborne radar scatterometer for estimation of stand heights. Can. J. Forest Res. 30, 1983–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Milton, E. J. (2001). Methods in Field Spectroscopy. <http://www.soton.ac.uk/∼epfs/methods/spectroscopy.shtml

Ostro, L. E. T., Young, T. P., Siver, S. C. &.Koontz, F. W. (1999). A geographic information system method for estimating home range size. J. Wildlife. Man. 63, 748–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Peterson, C. (1990). Into the woods with GPS. GPS World 1, 31–6Google Scholar

Phillips, K. A., Elvey, C. R. & Abercrombie, C. L. (1998). Applying GPS to the study of primate ecology: a useful tool?Am. J. Primatol. 46, 167–723.0.CO;2-U>CrossRef Google Scholar

Plummer, S. E. (2000). Perspectives on combining ecological process models and remotely sensed data. Ecol. Model. 129, 169–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Reybenayas, J. M. & Pope, K. O. (1995). Landscape ecology and diversity patterns in the seasonal tropics from Landsat TM imagery. Ecol. Appl. 5, 386–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Riera, B., Philippe, M., Dosso, M., Bernard, R., Vidalmadjar, D. & Dechambre, M. (1994). Study of the ground vegetation system in the Guiana tropical rain-forest with scatterometer in a nadir looking mode. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 49, 357–77Google Scholar

Saatchi, S., Agosti, D., Alger, K., Delabie, J. & Musinsky, J. (2001). Examining fragmentation and loss of primary forest in the southern Bahian Atlantic forest of Brazil with radar imagery. Conserv. Biol. 15, 867–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Sampson, P. H., Mohammed, G. H., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Miller, J. R., Noland, T. L., Irving, D., Treitz, P. M., Colombo, S. J. & Freemantle, J. (2000). The bioindicators of forest condition project: a physiological, remote sensing approach. Forestry Chron. 76, 941–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Sampson, P. H., Treitz, P. M. & Mohammed, G. H. (2001). Remote sensing of forest condition in tolerant hardwoods: an examination of spatial scale, structure and function. Can. J. Remote Sens. 27, 232–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, A. P., Horning, N. & Moore, D. (1997). Regional biodiversity planning and lemur conservation in western Madagascar. Conserv. Biol. 11, 498-512CrossRef Google Scholar

Takeuchi, S., Suga, Y., Oguro, Y. & Konishi, T. (2000). Monitoring of new plantation development in tropical rain forests using JERS-1 SAR data. Adv. Space Res. 26, 1151–4CrossRef Google Scholar

Teillet, P., Dtaenz, M. K. & Williams, D. J. (1997). Effects of spectral, spatial and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions. Remote Sens. Environ. 61, 139–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Thenkabail, P. S. (1999). Characterization of the alternative to slash-and-burn benchmark research area representing the Congolese rainforests of Africa using SPOT HRV data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 839–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, D. P., Cohen, W. B., Kennedy, R. E., Fassnacht, K. S. & Briggs, J. M. (1999). Relationship between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites. Remote Sens. Environ. 70, 52–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Velazquez, A., Romero, F. J., Rangel-Cordero, H. & Heil, G. W. (2001). Effects of landscape changes on mammalian assemblages at Izta-Popo volcanoes, Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 1059–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Wadsworth, R. & Treweek, J. (1999). GIS for Ecology: An Introduction Harlow: Longman Ltd.

Wilkie, D. S. & Finn, J. Y. (1996). Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring: A Guide for First-Time Users. New York: Columbia University Press

Wulder, M. A. (1998). The prediction of leaf area index from forest polygons decomposed through the integration of remote sensing, GIS, UNIX and C. Comput. Geosci. 24, 151–7CrossRef Google Scholar