Mandatory folic acid fortification of enriched grains has reduced neural tube defect prevalence in several countries. We examined salt as an additional vehicle for folic acid fortification. The primary objective was to examine the change in serum folate concentration after 1 month of consumption of fortified iodised salt with folic acid (FISFA) among women of reproductive age. The secondary objectives were to examine (1) the feasibility of implementing FISFA intervention and (2) the acceptability of FISFA.

We conducted a pre–post intervention study (January–April 2023). Participants received a FISFA saltshaker with the study salt (1 g of sodium chloride salt fortified with 100 mcg of folic acid) to use instead of regular table salt for 1 month. Serum folate was measured using the Elecsys Folate-III immunoassay method at baseline and 1-month endpoint. Change in serum folate was assessed using a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples.

Metropolitan city, Southern USA.

Non-pregnant, 18–40-year-old women who lived alone/with a partner.

Thirty-two eligible women consented to participate, including eleven non-Hispanic-White, eleven non-Hispanic-Black and ten Hispanic. Post-intervention, there was a significant increase in median serum folate concentration of 1·40 nmol/l (IQR 0·74–2·05; P < 0·001) from 24·08 nmol/l to 25·96 nmol/l in an analytical sample of n 29. An increase was seen in 28/29 (93 %) participants. Feasibility: 100 % study consent and compliance. FISFA acceptability: 25 d average use; 1·28 g average daily intake; 96·7 % and 90 % reported taste and colour of FISFA as highly acceptable, respectively.

FISFA is an effective approach to increasing serum folate concentrations among women of reproductive age. Findings should be replicated in a larger study.

Late life depression (LLD) refers to a diagnosis of major depressive disorder in people older than 60, and has been linked to significant cognitive impairment and increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Although anxiety and depression are highly comorbid, the impact of anxiety on cognition in LLD is far less researched. This is important given that over 20% of middle aged and older adults endorse clinically significant chronic worry. Generalized anxiety disorder in older adults with major depression is associated with poorer cognition and worse treatment outcomes compared with those without anxiety. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to examine the role of anxiety on memory in LLD. We hypothesized that presence of anxiety among older depressed adults would be associated with worse cognitive performance over time.

Participants included 124 individuals (69.4% female, 90.3% Caucasian) aged 60 or above (M = 71.5, SD = 7.4) who met criteria for major depression, single episode or recurrent. They completed the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and a measure of verbal episodic memory (WMS-IV Logical Memory) as part of a larger neuropsychological battery. Data were collected from baseline to three years as part of a larger NIMH-supported longitudinal study. Two-level linear mixed-effect models were fitted to predict memory. State and trait anxiety were used as time-varying predictors. The between-person (level 2) and within-person (level 1) effects of anxiety on memory were assessed controlling for the time trend, age, education, gender, race, and change in depression over time.

Plot trajectories across variables revealed a negative correlation such that as anxiety decreased, memory improved over time. Hierarchical linear mixed-effect models revealed that average state anxiety was a marginally significant between-person (level2) predictor for memory [B=-0.041, t(128)=-1.8, p=0.083]. Individuals with greater average state anxiety were more likely to experience memory decline compared to those with lower average state anxiety. In addition, the within-person effect (level 1) of state anxiety was significant [B=-0.096, t(253)=-2.7, p=0.007]. As an individual's anxiety increased over time, their memory declined. Trait anxiety showed a significant within-person effect on memory [B=-0.087, t(254)=-2.0, p=0.048], but a non-significant between-person effect [B=-0.005, t(124)=-0.06, p=0.95].

Anxiety appears to increase the risk of memory decline in older adults with major depression, a cohort who are already at risk of cognitive decline. Changes in anxiety increased risk of memory decline even when accounting for changes in depression over time. Although the causal link between anxiety and cognitive impairment remains unclear, it is possible that anxiety and worry may compete for cognitive resources necessary for demanding tasks and situations, detracting from abilities, such as attention and working memory. Older adults with depression may also have difficulty coping adaptively with anxiety, which may negatively affect cognition. Finally, presence of anxiety may represent a form of mild behavioral impairment, a prodrome of cognitive decline leading to dementia. Overall, the present study highlights the negative impact of anxiety on memory performance, indicating that treatment interventions targeting anxiety in older adults are essential to help prevent cognitive decline.

The concept of cognitive reserve (CR) explains why individuals with higher education, intelligence, or occupational attainment exhibit less severe cognitive changes in the presence of age-related or neurodegenerative pathology. CR may be a useful construct in understanding the cognitive performance of patients with late life depression (LLD), a cohort who are twice as likely to later receive a clinical diagnosis of dementia. It follows that depressed older adults with low CR may be at greater risk of cognitive decline compared to non-depressed older adults matched for CR. However, the literature on CR and LLD is limited to cross-sectional studies with mixed findings as to whether proxies of CR moderate cognitive outcomes in LLD. For example, both higher and lower education levels in LLD are associated with greater cognitive impairment in LLD compared to similarly educated non-depressed older adults. Longitudinal studies may help disentangle the association between CR and cognitive outcomes in LLD. The current study investigated the interaction between proxies of CR (e.g., education) and depression status on cognitive functioning over three years. We hypothesized that depressed older adults with low CR would demonstrate greater cognitive impairment and decline compared to depressed elders with high CR and non-depressed older adults with comparable CR.

Older adults with LLD and non-depressed older adults age 59+ participated. All participants were free of dementia at baseline. We divided both patients and non-depressed participants into low (<16) and high (>=16) education groups based upon the median years of education (16) of the entire sample. All participants underwent detailed neuropsychological testing. Composite measures of episodic memory (CERAD Wordlist and recall, LM I and LM II, BVRT), processing speed-executive functioning (SDMT and Trail Making Part B), working memory (forward, reverse, ascending Digit Span), and verbal fluency (Animal Naming and COWA) were calculated based on the non-depressed older adults.

The baseline sample included 210 non-depressed older adults and 465 older adults with major depression (LLD). 150 non-depressed older adults and 235 LLD patients provided three-year follow-up data. Separate ANOVAs revealed a statistically significant interaction between education and depression status at baseline on the composite score of executive functioning F (1, 668) = 8.74, p <.003. Consistent with our hypothesis, LLD with low education performed significantly worse compared to non-depressed with low education (z-score difference -1.35) and this effect was significantly greater than the difference between LLD patients and non-depressed with high education (z-score difference -0.36). No other interactions were found at baseline. Longitudinal analyses also revealed significant interactions between education and depression on memory over time, although sensitivity analyses did not suggest findings consistent with our hypothesis.

Cognitive reserve contribute to group differences between LLD and non-depressed older adults in cognitive performance but may not alter cognitive trajectories over time. Future studies should further explore structural and functional brain changes associated with CR in LLD.

Frailty and late-life depression (LLD) often coexist and share several structural brain changes. We aimed to study the joint effect LLD and frailty have on brain structure.

Cross-sectional study

Academic Health Center

Thirty-one participants (14 LLD+Frail and 17 Never-depressed+Robust)

LLD was diagnosed by a geriatric psychiatrist according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition for single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder without psychotic features. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL scale (0–5), classifying subjects as robust (0), prefrail (1–2), and frail (3–5). Participants underwent T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in which covariance analysis of subcortical volumes and vertex-wise analysis of cortical thickness values were performed to access changes in grey matter. Participants also underwent diffusion tensor imaging in which tract-based spatial statistics was used with voxel-wise statistical analysis on fractional anisotropy and mean diffusion values to assess changes in white matter (WM).

We found a significant difference in mean diffusion values (48,225 voxels; peak voxel: pFWER=0.005, MINI coord. (X,Y,Z) = −26,−11,27) between the LLD-Frail group and comparison group. The corresponding effect size (f=0.808) was large.

We showed the LLD+Frailty group is associated with significant microstructural changes within WM tracts compared to Never-depressed+Robust individuals. Our findings indicate the possibility of a heightened neuroinflammatory burden as a potential mechanism underlying the co-occurrence of both conditions and the possibility of a depression–frailty phenotype in older adults.

The relationships among depression, personality factors, and cognitive decline in the elderly are complex. Depressed elders score higher in neuroticism than nondepressed older individuals. Presence of neuroticism worsens cognitive decline in depressed older adults. Yet little is known about changes in neuroticism among older adults being treated for depression and the impact of these changes on cognitive decline.

Longitudinal observational study.

Academic Health Center.

We examined 68 participants in the neurobiology of late-life depression (LLD) study to test the hypothesis that older depressed subjects with more improvement in neuroticism would experience less cognitive decline compared with those with less change in neuroticism.

We measured neuroticism using the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised at baseline and 1 year. Study psychiatrists measured depression using the Montgomery–Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS). Global cognitive performance was measured using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) battery at baseline and annually over 3 years. Regression models of 1-year change in neuroticism and 3-year change in CERAD included sex, age, race, education, and 1-year change in MADRS score as covariates.

We found that among older adults, 1-year change in neuroticism was inversely associated with 3-year change in CERAD total score.

Our findings challenge the notion of longitudinal stability of measures of personality, especially among older depressed individuals. They highlight the importance of repeated personality assessment, especially of neuroticism, in the management of LLD. Future studies in larger samples followed for longer periods are needed to confirm our results and to extend them to examine both cognitive change and development of dementia.