How many serious mistakes can a brilliant philosopher make in a single paragraph? Many think that Mill answers this question by example–in the third paragraph of Chapter IV of Utilitarianism. Here is the notorious paragraph:
The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it: and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was so. No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness. This, however, being a fact, we have not only all the proof which the case admits of, but all which it is possible to require, that happiness is a good: that each person's happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made out its title as one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality.
The supposed mistakes in this paragraph are well known and seem to come at every step. (I will rehearse them in Section III.) Yet the idea that someone so smart should make the glaring mistakes people find in Mill's “proof” seems beyond belief.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.