Employment and relationship are crucial for social integration. However, individuals with major psychiatric disorders often face challenges in these domains.

We investigated employment and relationship status changes among patients across the affective and psychotic spectrum – in comparison with healthy controls, examining whether diagnostic groups or functional levels influence these transitions.

The sample from the longitudinal multicentric PsyCourse Study comprised 1260 patients with affective and psychotic spectrum disorders and 441 controls (mean age ± s.d., 39.91 ± 12.65 years; 48.9% female). Multistate models (Markov) were used to analyse transitions in employment and relationship status, focusing on transition intensities. Analyses contained multiple multistate models adjusted for age, gender, job or partner, diagnostic group and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) in different combinations to analyse the impact of the covariates on the hazard ratio of changing employment or relationship status.

The clinical group had a higher hazard ratio of losing partner (hazard ratio 1.46, P < 0.001) and job (hazard ratio 4.18, P < 0.001) than the control group (corrected for age/gender). Compared with controls, clinical groups had a higher hazard of losing partner (affective group, hazard ratio 2.69, P = 0.003; psychotic group, hazard ratio 3.06, P = 0.001) and job (affective group, hazard ratio 3.43, P < 0.001; psychotic group, hazard ratio 4.11, P < 0.001). Adjusting for GAF, the hazard ratio of losing partner and job decreased in both clinical groups compared with controls.

Patients face an increased hazard of job loss and relationship dissolution compared with healthy controls, and this is partially conditioned by the diagnosis and functional level. These findings underscore a high demand for destigmatisation and support for individuals in managing their functional limitations.

It has been posited that alcohol use may confound the association between greater concussion history and poorer neurobehavioral functioning. However, while greater alcohol use is positively correlated with neurobehavioral difficulties, the association between alcohol use and concussion history is not well understood. Therefore, this study investigated the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between cumulative concussion history, years of contact sport participation, and health-related/psychological factors with alcohol use in former professional football players across multiple decades.

Former professional American football players completed general health questionnaires in 2001 and 2019, including demographic information, football history, concussion/medical history, and health-related/psychological functioning. Alcohol use frequency and amount was reported for three timepoints: during professional career (collected retrospectively in 2001), 2001, and 2019. During professional career and 2001 alcohol use frequency included none, 1-2, 3-4, 5-7 days/week, while amount included none, 12, 3-5, 6-7, 8+ drinks/occasion. For 2019, frequency included never, monthly or less, 2-4 times/month, 2-3 times/week, >4 times/week, while amount included none, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, 10+ drinks/occasion. Scores on a screening measure for Alcohol Use Disorder (CAGE) were also available at during professional career and 2001 timepoints. Concussion history was recorded in 2001 and binned into five groups: 0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10+. Depression and pain interference were assessed via PROMIS measures at all timepoints. Sleep disturbance was assessed in 2001 via separate instrument and with PROMIS Sleep Disturbance in 2019. Spearman’s rho correlations tested associations between concussion history and years of sport participation with alcohol use across timepoints, and whether poor health functioning (depression, pain interference, sleep disturbance) in 2001 and 2019 were associated with alcohol use both within and between timepoints.

Among the 351 participants (Mage=47.86[SD=10.18] in 2001), there were no significant associations between concussion history or years of contact sport participation with CAGE scores or alcohol use frequency/amount during professional career, 2001, or 2019 (rhos=-.072-.067, ps>.05). In 2001, greater depressive symptomology and sleep disturbance were related to higher CAGE scores (rho=.209, p<.001; rho=.176, p<.001, respectively), while greater depressive symptomology, pain interference, and sleep disturbance were related to higher alcohol use frequency (rho=.176, p=.002; rho=.109, p=.045; rho=.132, p=.013, respectively) and amount/occasion (rho=.215, p<.001; rho=.127, p=.020; rho=.153, p=.004, respectively). In 2019, depressive symptomology, pain interference, and sleep disturbance were not related to alcohol use (rhos=-.047-.087, ps>.05). Between timepoints, more sleep disturbance in 2001 was associated with higher alcohol amount/occasion in 2019 (rho=.115, p=.036).

Increased alcohol intake has been theorized to be a consequence of greater concussion history, and as such, thought to confound associations between concussion history and neurobehavioral function later in life. Our findings indicate concussion history and years of contact sport participation were not significantly associated with alcohol use cross-sectionally or longitudinally, regardless of alcohol use characterization. While higher levels of depression, pain interference, and sleep disturbance in 2001 were related to greater alcohol use in 2001, they were not associated cross-sectionally in 2019. Results support the need to concurrently address health-related and psychological factors in the implementation of alcohol use interventions for former NFL players, particularly earlier in the sport discontinuation timeline.

If people with episodic mental-health conditions lose their job due to an episode of their mental illness, they often experience personal negative consequences. Therefore, reintegration after sick leave is critical to avoid unfavorable courses of disease, longer inability to work, long payment of sickness benefits, and unemployment. Existing return-to-work (RTW) programs have mainly focused on “common mental disorders” and often used very elaborate and costly interventions without yielding convincing effects. It was the aim of the RETURN study to evaluate an easy-to-implement RTW intervention specifically addressing persons with mental illnesses being so severe that they require inpatient treatment.

The RETURN study was a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial in acute psychiatric wards addressing inpatients suffering from a psychiatric disorder. In intervention wards, case managers (RTW experts) were introduced who supported patients in their RTW process, while in control wards treatment, as usual, was continued.

A total of 268 patients were recruited for the trial. Patients in the intervention group had more often returned to their workplace at 6 and 12 months, which was also mirrored in more days at work. These group differences were statistically significant at 6 months. However, for the main outcome (days at work at 12 months), differences were no longer statistically significant (p = 0.14). Intervention patients returned to their workplace earlier than patients in the control group (p = 0.040).

The RETURN intervention has shown the potential of case-management interventions when addressing RTW. Further analyses, especially the qualitative ones, may help to better understand limitations and potential areas for improvement.