Demystifying Legal Reasoning
Demystifying Legal Reasoning
Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.
Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.
- Challenges widespread assumptions about legal reasoning
- The book offers a comprehensive analysis of methods of legal reasoning
- Questions the current thinking about interpretation of legal texts
Product details
- Published: June 2008
- Format: Paperback
- ISBN: 9780521703956
- Length: 264 pages
- Dimensions: 228 × 152 × 20 mm
- Weight: 0.36kg
- Availability: Available
Often bought together
The Nature and Authority of Precedent
Format: Paperback
How to Do Things with Rules
Format: Paperback
Often bought together
Related Journals
Israel Law Review
Format: Journal
The Israel Law Review is the oldest and most acclaimed Israeli law journal published in English. Since its establishment in 1966 it has become a leading publication in the field of human rights, public law and international law; focusing on law in times of tension and conflict.The Review enjoys a long-standing reputation for excellence, applies a rigorous system of peer review and attracts a combination of established authors and new voices writing on cutting edge topics.The Israel Law Review is published under the auspices and management of the Minerva Center for Human Rights at the Law Faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Under this stewardship, it focuses on scholarship in the fields of human rights, public law and international law and also examines the application of legal norms under conditions of conflict and political uncertainty - highlighting the relevance of the Israeli experience in these fields to other parts of the world and that of other societies to Israel.
Legal Information Management
Format: Journal
Aimed at professionals active in the legal information community this topical journal provides invaluable information for all those involved in the provision of legal information in the academic and professional environments. Published quarterly, and with an extensive current awareness section, a regular international developments column and coverage of management issues, Legal Information Management is the international journal for legal information professionals everywhere.
International Journal of Law in Context
Format: Journal
The International Journal of Law in Context provides a forum for interdisciplinary legal studies and offers intellectual space for ground-breaking critical research. It is not committed to any particular theory, ideology or methodology and invites papers from a variety of standpoints, ideologies, perspectives, and methods. It publishes contextual work about law and its relationship with other disciplines including but not limited to science, literature, humanities, philosophy, sociology, psychology, ethics, history and geography. The journal aims to explore and expand the boundaries of law and legal studies.
The Cambridge Law Journal
Format: Journal
The Cambridge Law Journal publishes articles on all aspects of law. Special emphasis is placed on contemporary developments, but the journal's range includes jurisprudence and legal history. An important feature of the journal is the Case and Comment section, in which members of the Cambridge Law Faculty and other distinguished contributors analyse recent judicial decisions, new legislation and current law reform proposals. The articles and case notes are designed to have the widest appeal to those interested in the law — whether as practitioners, students, teachers, judges or administrators — and to provide an opportunity for them to keep abreast of new ideas and the progress of legal reform. Each issue also contains an extensive section of book reviews.
Related Journals
Also by this Author
$61.00 (P) USD
$42.00 (P) USD
$100.00 (C) USD
$123.00 (C) USD
$45.00 (P) USD
$41.00 (P) USD
$124.00 (C) USD
Also by this Author
Table of Contents
- Part I. Law and its Function:
- 1. Moral controversy
- Part II. Common Law Reasoning: Deciding Cases When Prior Judicial Decisions Determine the Law:
- 2. Ordinary reason applied to law: natural reasoning and deduction from rules
- 3. The mystification of common-law reasoning
- 4. Common law practice
- Part III. Reasoning from Canonical Legal Text:
- 5. Interpreting statutes and other posited rules
- 6. Infelicities of the intended meaning of canonical texts and norms constraining interpretation
- 7. Non-intentionalist interpretation
- 8. Is constitutional interpretation different? Why it isn't and is
- 9. All or nothing.
- Show more
Authors
Larry Alexander , University of San Diego School of Law
Professor Alexander is a Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of: Is There a Right to Freedom of Expression? (Cambridge, 2005); (with Emily Sherwin) The Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001); Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge, 1998); (with Paul Horton) Whom Does the Constitution Command? (1988); several anthologies; and over 160 articles, book chapters, and review essays in jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law, and normative ethics. He has been a member of the faculty at the University of San Diego School of Law since 1970. He is co-editor of the journal Legal Theory (Cambridge), and he serves on the editorial boards of Ethics, Law and Philosophy and Criminal Law and Philosophy. He is co-executive director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy at the University of San Diego, and he is past president of AMINTAPHIL.
Emily Sherwin , Cornell University Law School, New York
Professor Sherwin is Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School. She specializes in jurisprudence, property, and remedies. She is the author (with Larry Alexander) of The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001) and has published numerous book chapters, articles, and reviews in her subjects of specialty. She was a member of the faculty at the University of Kentucky College of Law from 1985 to 1990 and the University of San Diego School of Law from 1990 to 2003, when she moved to Cornell University. She is a member of the advisory committee for the ALI's Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment and a regular participant in roundtable conferences of the University of San Diego's Institute for Law and Philosophy.
Browse by related subject
- Classical philosophy
- Early modern philosophy
- Eighteenth-century philosophy
- Epistemology and metaphysics
- Ethics
- History of philosophy
- Legal philosophy
- Logic
- Medieval philosophy
- Nineteenth-century philosophy
- Non-western philosophy
- Philosophy of mind and language
- Philosophy of science
- Philosophy of social science
- Philosophy texts
- Philosophy: general interest
- Political philosophy
- Renaissance philosophy
- Twentieth-century philosophy