You are viewing content intended for a different location. This may affect your ability to shop online.

Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


The Increasing Viability of Good News

The Increasing Viability of Good News

The Increasing Viability of Good News

Authors:
Stuart Soroka, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Yanna Krupnikov, Stony Brook University, State University of New York
Published:
August 2021
Availability:
Available
Format:
Paperback
ISBN:
9781108987080

Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.

$25.00 (P) USD
Paperback
$25.00 (Z) USD
eBook

    In spite of what appears to be the increasingly negative tone of media coverage, this Element suggests that the prevalence of positive news is likely to increase, for three reasons: (1) valence-based asymmetries vary over time, (2) valence-based asymmetries vary across individuals, and (3) technology facilitates diverse news platforms catering to diverse preferences. Each of these claims is examined in detail here, based on analyses of prior and/or novel data on media content, psychophysiological responses, and survey-based experiments. Results are considered as they relate to our understanding of media gatekeeping, political communication, and political psychology, and also as actionable findings for producers of media content, communications platforms, and media consumers.

    Product details

    • Published: August 2021
    • Format: Paperback
    • ISBN: 9781108987080
    • Length: 64 pages
    • Dimensions: 228 × 151 × 4 mm
    • Weight: 0.11kg
    • Availability: Available

    Table of Contents

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. The Valence of News Coverage
    • 3. The Argument
    • 4. Discussion
    • Bibliography.

    Authors

    Stuart Soroka , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Yanna Krupnikov , Stony Brook University, State University of New York