Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:07:21.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression

from Part I - History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

Claus Kreß
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Stefan Barriga
Affiliation:
United Nations, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Crime of Aggression
A Commentary
, pp. 214 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organisations, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 2nd rev. edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Corten, O., The Law Against War. The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace, vol. I (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Lowe, A. V., International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Eritrea–Ethiopia Armed Conflict’, in de Guttry, A., Post, H. H. G. and Venturini, G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia: An International Legal Perspective (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 243–58.Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Use of Force’, in Tams, C. J. and Sloan, J. (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2013), 237–61.Google Scholar
Hexner, E. P., ‘Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public International Organisations’, in Engel, S. and Metall, R. A. (eds.), Law, State and International Legal Order: Essays in Honor of Hans Kelsen (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1964), 119–38.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the “Principle of the Non-Use of Force”’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 561604.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. V. and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (10 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 4759.Google Scholar
Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 154 (1977), 236361.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The Definition of Aggression: Extracts from Speech Delivered in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly by the Representative of the United Kingdom, Mr. G. G. Fitzmaurice, C.M.G., on January, 9, 1952’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1 (1952), 137–44.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, American Journal of International Law, 86 (1992), 4692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan-Doran, J. and van Ginkel, B. T., ‘Aggression as a Crime under International Law and the Prosecution of Individuals by the Proposed International Criminal Court’, Netherlands International Law Review, 43 (1996), 321–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 11791217.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189207.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58 (2009), 493517.Google Scholar
Tams, C. J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 359–97.Google Scholar
Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 81 (1952), 451517.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Armed Activities case) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Oil Platforms case) (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua case) (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar
Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1949), 4.Google Scholar
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) (Preliminary Objections), ICJ Reports (1998), 432.Google Scholar
House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Wall case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Nuclear Weapons case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar
Appellate Body Report, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, adopted 19 June 2000.Google Scholar
Appellate Body Report, Canada – Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain, WT/DS276/AB/R, adopted 27 September 2004.Google Scholar
Appellate Body Report, United States – Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India, WT/DS33/AB/R, adopted 23 May 1997.Google Scholar
Appellate Body Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 March 2005.Google Scholar
Convention between Czechoslovakia, Romania, Turkey, the USSR and Yugoslavia concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 4 July 1933), 148 LNTS 211.Google Scholar
Convention between the USSR and Lithuania concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 5 July 1933), 148 LNTS 79.Google Scholar
Draft Act Relating to the Definition of Aggression presented by the Committee on Security Questions to the General Commission of the League of Nations Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments on 24 May 1933, League Document 1935.IX.4.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, ‘Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (Articles on State Responsibility), Yb ILC (2001), vol. II, part 2, 26, adopted by General Assembly, Responsibility of State for International Wrongful Acts, 28 January 2002, UN Doc. A/RES/56/83.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, Yb ILC (1996), vol. I., 239 (including commentary).Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment, 1 October 1946, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 172.Google Scholar
Treaty of Non-Aggression and Pacific Settlement of Disputes Between Finland and the USSR (signed 21 January 1932), 157 LNTS 393.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Second Report on Identification of International Customary Law, International Law Commission’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/672, 22 May 2014.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×