Duxbury, N., Frederick Pollock and the English Juristic Tradition (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Müller-Meiningen, E., ‘Who Are the Huns?’: The Law of Nations and its Breakers (abr. Der Weltkrieg und der Zusammenbruch des Völkerrechts), introduction and trans. Orchelle, R. L. (pseud. of Scheffauer, H. G.) (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1915).Google Scholar

Smith, B. F., The American Road to Nuremberg: the Documentary Record 1944–1945 (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Walworth, A., Wilson and His Peacemakers: American Diplomacy at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 (New York: Norton, 1986).Google Scholar

Scott, J. B., ‘The Trial of the Kaiser’ (appendix), in House, E. M. and Seymour, C. (eds.), What Really Happened at Paris: The Story of the Peace Conference, 1918–1919 (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1921), 475–81.Google Scholar

Lansing, R., ‘Some Legal Questions of the Peace Conference’, American Journal of International Law, 13 (1919), 631–50.Google Scholar

Orlando, V. E., ‘On the Aborted Decision to Bring the German Emperor to Trial’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5 (2007), 1015–28.Google Scholar

‘Coalition Policy Defined, Mr Lloyd George’s Pledges’, The Times (6 December 1918).Google Scholar

‘Ex-Kaiser is Busy on his Defense’, New York Times (28 December 1919).Google Scholar

‘Germany to Print War Blame Papers’, New York Times (26 July 1919).Google Scholar

‘New Light on the War’, The Times (22 September 1919).Google Scholar

‘The Kaiser’s Guilt’, The Times (26 November 1919).Google Scholar

Larnaude, F. and de Lapradelle, A., Examen de la responsibilité pénale de l’Empereur Guillaume II (Paris: Ministère de la Guerre, November 1918) (available at: data.decalog.net/enap1/liens/fonds/F8G90.pdf).Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), in Parry, C. (ed.), Consolidated Treaty Series, vol. 225 (231 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1969–81).Google Scholar

Appleman, J. A., Military Tribunals and International Crimes (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril, 1954).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis, vol. I (2 vols., New York: Oceana, 1975).Google Scholar

Glueck, S., The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1946).Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Kittichaisaree, K., International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kemp, G., Individual Criminal Responsibility for the International Crime of Aggression (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar

May, L., Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McMahon, M. M., Conquest and Modern International Law: The Legal Limitations on the Acquisition of Territory by Conquest (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Minear, R. H., Victors’ Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial (Princeton University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Pompe, C. A., Aggressive War: An International Crime (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1953).Google Scholar

Rifaat, A. M., International Aggression: A Study of the Legal Concept (Stockholm: Anqvist & Wiksell, 1979).Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Simpson, J., Law, War and Crime (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Solera, O., Defining the Crime of Aggression (London: Cameron May, 2007).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Aggression and World Order: A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression (Sydney: Maitland, 1958).Google Scholar

White, N. D., Keeping the Peace: The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: the Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S., Danspreckguber, W. and Wenaweser, C. (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression (Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination, Princeton University, 2009), 1–20.Google Scholar

Greppi, E., ‘State Responsibility for Acts of Aggression Under the United Nations Charter: A Review of Cases’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Law: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 499–518.Google Scholar

Ko, K., ‘The Tokyo Judgment on Crimes against Peace and the Crime of Aggression’, in Universität zu Köln/Japanisches Kulturinstitut (eds.), Beiträge aus dem Symposium Japan and Germany – 150 Years of Cooperation. Dynamics of Traditional Research Societies in a Rapidly Changing World (Munich: Iudicium, 2013), 81–101.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The Nuremberg Judgment on Crimes against Peace and the Crime of Aggression’, in Universität zu Köln/Japanisches Kulturinstitut (eds.), Beiträge aus dem Symposium Japan and Germany – 150 Years of Cooperation. Dynamics of Traditional Research Societies in a Rapidly Changing World (Munich: Iudicium, 2013), 69–80.Google Scholar

Lukashuk, I. I., ‘International Illegality and Criminality of Aggression’, in Ginsburgs, G. and Kudriavtsev, V. N. (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990), 121–53.Google Scholar

McDougall, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression: Born of the Failure of Collective Security – Still Shackled to its Fate? Time to Catch Up or Part Ways’, in Blumenthal, D. A. and McCormack, T. L. H. (eds.), The Legacy of Nuremberg (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), 131–67.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 725–54.Google Scholar

Simons, W. B., ‘The Jurisdictional Bases of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg’, in Ginsburgs, G. and Kudriavtsev, V. N. (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1990), 39–59.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘International Law and the Holocaust’, Californian Western International Law Journal, 9 (1979), 201–305.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Nuremberg Forty Years After’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 80 (1986), 59–68.Google Scholar

Bennett, T. W., ‘A Linguistic Perspective of the Definition of Aggression’, German Yearbook of International Law, 31 (1988), 48–69.Google Scholar

Bial, L., ‘The Nuremberg Judgment and International Law’, Brooklyn Law Review, 13 (1947), 34–49.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–423.Google Scholar

Carpenter, A. C., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 64 (1995), 223–42.Google Scholar

Chacko, C. J., ‘International Law and the Concept of Aggression’, Indian Journal of International Law, 3 (1963), 396–412.Google Scholar

Cryer, R., ‘Aggression at the Court of Appeal’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 10(2) (2005), 209–30.Google Scholar

Dawson, G. M., ‘Defining Substantive Crimes within the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: What is the Crime of Aggression?’, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19 (2002), 413–52.Google Scholar

DeNicola, C. P., ‘A Shield for the “Knights of Humanity”: The ICC Should Adopt a Humanitarian Necessity Defense to the Crime of Aggression’, University of Philadelphia Journal of International Law, 30 (2008–9), 641–90.Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A., ‘The Push to Criminalise Aggression: Something Lost Amid the Gains?’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 291–319.Google Scholar

Ehard, H., ‘The Nuremberg Trial against the Major War Criminals and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 43 (1949) 223–45.Google Scholar

Finch, G. A., ‘The Nuremberg Tribunal and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 20–37.Google Scholar

Garcia-Mora, M. R., ‘Crimes against Peace in International Law: From Nuremberg to the Present’, Kentucky Law Journal, 53 (1964–65), 35–55.Google Scholar

Glueck, S., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War’, Harvard Law Review, 59 (1945–6), 396–456.Google Scholar

Greenwood, C., ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 36 (1987), 283–306.Google Scholar

Griffiths, R. L., ‘International Law, the Crime of Aggression and the Ius Ad Bellum’, International Criminal Law Review, 2 (2002), 301–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18(3) (2007), 477–97.Google Scholar

Ireland, G., ‘Ex Post Facto from Rome to Tokyo’, Temple Law Quarterly, 21 (1947–48), 27–61.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., ‘Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?’, International Law Quarterly, 1 (1947), 153–71.Google Scholar

King, H. T., ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 34(3) (2002), 335–56.Google Scholar

Kopelman, E. S., ‘Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial’, New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, 23 (1990–1), 373–444.Google Scholar

Lippman, M., ‘Nuremberg: Forty-Five Years Later’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 7 (1991–2), 1–64.Google Scholar

Lippman, M., ‘The History, Development and Decline of Crimes against Peace’, George Washington International Law Review, 36 (2004), 957–1056.Google Scholar

Lumb, R. D., ‘Individual Responsibility for Aggressive War: The Crime Against Peace’, University of Queensland Law Journal, 3 (1956–9), 333–55.Google Scholar

MacPherson, B. F., ‘Building an International Criminal Court for the 21st Century’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 13 (1998), 1–60.Google Scholar

Maogoto, J. N., ‘Aggression Supreme: International Offence Still in Search of a Definition’, Southern Cross University Law Review, 6 (2002), 278–317.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Defining Aggression for the International Criminal Court’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 25 (2001), 1–15.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality: Custom in Kampala’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar

Müller-Schieke, I. K., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression under the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 14 (2001), 409–30.Google Scholar

Radin, M., ‘Justice at Nuremberg’, Foreign Affairs, 24(3) (1946), 369–84.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘In Defense of International Rules on the Use of Force’, University of Chicago Law Review, 53 (1986), 113–46.Google Scholar

Schick, F. B., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and the International Law of the Future’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 770–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schick, F. B., ‘Crimes against Peace’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 38(5) (1948), 445–65.Google Scholar

Schuster, M., ‘The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression: A Gordian Knot in Search of a Sword’, Criminal Law Forum, 14(1) (2003), 1–57.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘Defining “Aggression”: Why the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court has Faced such a Conundrum’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 24 (2002), 439–66.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 38–72.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar

Government Commissioner of the General Tribunal of the Military Government for the French Zone of Occupation in Germany v. Hermann Roechling et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. XIV (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951–52).Google Scholar

House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, Case No. 74, Trial of Artur Greiser, Law Reports of War Criminals Selected and Prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (1947).Google Scholar

Chinese War Crimes Military Tribunal of the Ministry of National Defence, Case No. 83, Trial of Takashi Sakai, Law Reports of War Criminals Selected and Prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (1947).Google Scholar

United States et al. v. Hermann Wilhelm Göring et al., International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (1950).Google Scholar

United States et al. v. Sadao Araki et al., in Pritchard, John R. (ed.), The Tokyo Major War Crimes Trial: The Records of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East with an Authoritative Commentary and Comprehensive Guide (1998).Google Scholar

USA v. Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. IX (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1950).Google Scholar

USA v. Carl Krauch et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. VII–VIII (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1952).Google Scholar

USA v. Ernst von Weizsäcker et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. XII–XIV (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951).Google Scholar

USA v. Wilhelm von Leeb et al., Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vols. X–XI (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951).Google Scholar

Control Council Law No. 10: Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes Against Peace and Against Humanity, adopted 20 December 1945, Official Gazette, Control Council for Germany, No. 3, 31 January 1946, 50–55.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on its Second Session’, Yearbook of the International Law Commission (1950), vol. II, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1950/Add.1.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1946).Google Scholar

Military Government – Germany, United States Zone, Ordinance No. 7, reproduced in Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. I (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1952), xxi–xxvi.Google Scholar

Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 (1952).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Resolution on the Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognised by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/95 (1946).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Resolution on the Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970, UN Doc. A/RES/2625 (1970).Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H., Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945 (Washington, DC: United States Department of State, 1949).Google Scholar

United Nations War Crimes Commission, History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War (London: HMSO, 1948), 258–59.Google Scholar

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (signed 22 August 1864, entered into force 22 June 1865), 129 Consol. T.S. 361.Google Scholar

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (signed 8 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 150.Google Scholar

General Treaty for the Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force 24 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex (signed 29 July 1899, entered into force 4 September 1900), 1 Bevans 247.Google Scholar

Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (signed 18 October 1907, entered into force 26 January 1910), UKTS 1910 No. 9.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace Between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, Peace Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), 2 Bevans 43.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 49.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Finland (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 48 UNTS 228.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Hungary (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 41 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Italy (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 49 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace with Romania (signed 10 February 1947, entered into force 15 September 1947), 42 UNTS 33.Google Scholar

van Poelgeest, L., The Netherlands and the Tokyo Tribunal, Part 2: Aspects of the Allied Occupation of Japan (London: Suntory–Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, 1991).Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Tucker, R. W., The Just War: A Study in Contemporary American Doctrine (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Vyshinsky, A. Y., For Peace and Security of the Peoples against the Threat of a New War (London: Soviet News Booklet, 1950).Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. M., ‘Wars of Liberation – As Fought in U.N. Organs’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Claude, I. L. Jr., ‘Just Wars: Doctrines and Institutions’, Political Science Quarterly, 95 (1980), 83–96.Google Scholar

Forsythe, D. P., Review Essay, ‘Law, Morality, and War after Vietnam’, World Politics, 28 (1976), 450–72.Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., ‘The Cult of Custom in the late 20th Century’, California Western International Law Journal, 17 (1987), 133–45.Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. M., ‘Aggression, Intervention and Self-Defence in Modern International Law’, Recueil des Cours/Académie de droit international, 136 (1972-II), 411–98.Google Scholar

Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar

Charter of the United Nations, Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, vol. XV (New York: United Nations Information Organizations, 1945–55).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, 14 December 1960, UN Doc. A/RES/1514(XV).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970, UN Doc. A/RES/2625(XXV).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Draft Definition of Aggression, 4 November 1950, UN Doc. A/C.1/608.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Duties of States in the Event of the Outbreak of Hostilities, 17 November 1950, UN Doc. A/C.1/SR.384.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Need to Expedite the Drafting of a Definition of Aggression in the Light of the Present International Situation, 18 December 1967, UN Doc. A/RES/2330(XXII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 31 January 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/599(VI).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 20 December 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/688(VII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 4 December 1954, UN Doc. A/RES/895(IX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 29 November 1957, UN Doc. A/RES/1181(XII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Uniting for Peace, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/377(V).Google Scholar

United Nations (ed.), ‘Political and Security Questions: Proposals for Strengthening Peace’, in Yearbook of the United Nations 1950 (1951), 181–220.Google Scholar

UN Security Council, Security Council Official Records, 18 December 1961, UN Doc. S/PV.987.Google Scholar

UN Security Council, Security Council Official Records, 18 December 1961, UN Doc. S/PV.988.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, ‘The Blue Series’ (42 vols., Nuremberg: IMT, 1947–49).Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Pritchard, R. J. (ed.), The Tokyo Major War Crimes Trial (124 vols., Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Johnson, L. B., ‘Remarks at Townsville upon Departing from Australia’, 23 October 1966, www.presidency.ucsb.edu.Google Scholar

‘Vishinsky Depicts Dire West Future’, New York Times (22 November 1952).Google Scholar

Aroneanu, E., La définition de l’agression (Paris: Editions Internationales, 1958).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C., The Travaux Préparatories of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Broms, B., The Definition of Aggression in the United Nations (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1968).Google Scholar

Bruha, T., Die Definition Aggression. Faktizität und Normativität des UN-Konsensbildungsprozesses der Jahre 1968 bis 1974 zugleich ein Beitrag zur Strukturanalyse des Völkerrechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1980).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression. The Search for World Peace. A Documentary History and Analysis (2 vols., New York: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Nyiri, N., The United Nations Search for a Definition of Aggression (New York: Peter Lang, 1989).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus: United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Akram, S. M. and Link, M., ‘Arab Isareli Conflict’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2011).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’ in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatories of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C. and Ferencz, B. B., ‘The Crime against Peace and Aggression: From its Origins to the ICC’, in Bassiouni, M. C., International Criminal Law, vol. 3 (3 vols., Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008), 207–42.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., ‘Aggression’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated September 2015).Google Scholar

Hofmann, R., ‘Annexation’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated February 2013).Google Scholar

Keller, H., ‘Friendly Relations Declaration (1970)’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated June 2009).Google Scholar

McDonald, A. and Bruha, T., ‘Bombardment’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2011).Google Scholar

Oeter, S., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression, die Konferenz von Kampala und das deutsche Strafrecht’, in Jeßberger, F. and Geneuss, J. (eds.), Zehn Jahre Völkerstrafgesetzbuch. Bilanz und Perspektiven eines ‘deutschen Völkerstrafrechts’ (Baden-Baden: Nomos & Stämpfli, 2013), 101–25.Google Scholar

Schorkopf, F., ‘Versailles Peace Treaty (1919)’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated October 2010).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Die Arbeit der ILC im Bereich des materiellen Völkerstrafrechts’, in Hankel, G. and Stuby, G. (eds.), Strafgerichte gegen Menschheitsverbrechen: zum Völkerstrafrecht 50 Jahre nach den Nürnberger Prozessen (Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS Verlagsges, 1995), 270–94.Google Scholar

Walter, C., ‘Postscript: Self-Determination, Secession, and the Crimean Crisis 2014’, in Walter, C., von Ungern-Sternberg, A. and Abushov, K. (eds.), Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2014), 293–311.Google Scholar

Willms, B., ‘Zur Dialektik von Kooperation und Abgrenzung im Entspannungsprozess zwischen Ost und West’, in Zellentin, G. (ed.), Annäherung, Abgrenzung und friedlicher Wandel in Europa (Boppard am Rhein: Boldt, 1976), 45–78.Google Scholar

Woltag, J. C., ‘Cyber Warfare’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated May 2015).Google Scholar

Wood, M., ‘Use of Force, Prohibition of Threat’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, updated June 2013).Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463–509.Google Scholar

Bothe, M., ‘Die Erklärung der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen über die Definition der Aggression’, Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht, 18 (1975), 127–45.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., ‘Enabling the International Criminal Court to Punish Aggression’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 551–66.Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2010), 71–114.Google Scholar

Garvey, J. I., ‘The UN Definition of Aggression: Law and Illusion in the Context of Collective Security’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 17 (1976–77), 177–99.Google Scholar

Hofmeister, H., ‘Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam: eine Analyse des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltanwendungsverbots’ (‘An Analysis of the Ban on the Threat of Force under the Law of Nations’), Archiv des Völkerrechts, 48 (2010), 248–65.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar

Sahovic, M., ‘Codification des principes du droit international des relations amicales et de la coopération entre les Etats’, Recueil de Cours, 137 (1972), 243–310.Google Scholar

Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports (2007), 43.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Case Concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, ICJ Reports (1986), 259.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Appeal Judgment, ICTY-IT-94-1-A., 15 July 1999.Google Scholar

USA v. Weizsäcker et al. (the Ministries case), Case No. 11, Military Tribunal IV.Google Scholar

Declaration of Principles (Atlantic Charter) (signed and entered into force 14 August 1941) 204 LNTS 384.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Establishment of an International Law Commission, 21 November 1947, UN Doc. A/RES/174(II).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Need to Expedite the Drafting of a Definition of Aggression in the Light of the Present International Situation, 18 December 1967, UN Doc. A/RES/2330(XXII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 20 December 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/688(VII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 4 December 1954, UN Doc. A/RES/895(IX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 29 November 1957, UN Doc. A/RES/1181(XII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Sixth Committee’, UN Doc. A/6988.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression’, UN Doc. A/AC.66/L.11 (1953).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression’, UN GAOR, 26th Session, Supp. No. 19, UN Doc. A/8419, Annex II.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 31 January 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/599(VI).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Six Power Draft’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 17 and Add. 1 and 2.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘The Soviet Draft Definition of Aggression’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 12.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Thirteen Power Draft’, UN Doc. A/AC. 134/L. 16 and Add. 1 and 2.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Twenty-six Power Draft Resolution’, UN Doc. A/C. 6/L.644.Google Scholar

General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (signed 27 August 1928, entered into force on 25 July 1929), 94 LNTS 57.Google Scholar

Letter of the Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko, 22 September 1967, UN Doc. A/6833.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 667 (1990) concerning the situation between Iraq and Kuwait, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar

Spiropoulos, J., ‘Formulation of the Nuremberg Principles’, UN Doc. A/CN. 4/22, Yb ILC (1950), vol. II, 181.Google Scholar

Treaty of Mutual Guarantee between Germany, Belgium, France, Great Britain and Italy (signed 16 October 1925, entered into force 14 September 1926).Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (adopted 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 4th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression, vol. I (2 vols., New York: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Goodrich, L. M. and Hambro, E., The Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents, 2nd edn (Boston, MA: World Peace Foundation, 1949).Google Scholar

Rifaat, A. M., International Aggression (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell, 1979).Google Scholar

Stueck, W., The Korean War: An International History (Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Surrey: Ashgate, 2010), 621–43.Google Scholar

Peters, A., ‘Article 24’, in Simma, B., Khan, D-E., Nolte, G. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 763–64.Google Scholar

Yee, L., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Security Council’, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 1999), 143–52.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), ICJ Reports (1980), 3.Google Scholar

Madzimbamuto v. Lardner-Burke; Baron v. Ayre Bezuidenhout, Dupont and Lardner-Burke, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, United Kingdom, 23 July 1968 (1970) 39 ILR 374.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Armed Israeli Aggression against the Iraqi Nuclear Installations and its Grave Consequences for the Established International System concerning the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and International Peace and Security, 13 November 1981, UN Doc. A/RES/36/27.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, UN Doc. A/51/22, vol. I (1996), para. 73, in GAOR 51st Session, Supp. No. 22, 19.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee, Question of Defining Aggression’, 13 July–14 August 1970, UN Doc. A/8019, GAOR 25th Session, Supp. No. 19, 22.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Sixth Committee’, 19 November 1970, UN Doc. A/8171, GAOR, 25th Session, Annexes, Item 87, 3.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee, Question of Defining Aggression’, 1 February–5 March 1971, UN Doc. A/8419, GAOR, 26th Session, Supp. No. 19.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Sixth Committee’, 19 November 1971, UN Doc. A/8525, GAOR, 26th Session, Annexes, Item 89.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee, Question of Defining Aggression’, UN Doc. A/8719, GAOR, 27th Session, Supp. No. 19, Annex II, appendix B.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Sixth Committee’, 7 December 1972, UN Doc. A/8929, GAOR, 27th Session, Annexes, Item 88.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Report of the Special Committee, Question of Defining Aggression’, 25 April–30 May 1973, UN Doc. A/9019, GAOR, 28th Session, Supp. No. 19, Annex II, appendix A.Google Scholar

‘Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of International Security and Organization (Gerig) and the Executive Secretary of the Policy Committee’, in United States Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, Diplomatic Papers, 1944, General, vol. I (7 vols., Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1966).Google Scholar

‘Observations by the Czechoslovak Government on the Dumbarton Oaks Proposals’, Doc. 2, G/14(b), 1 May 1945, 3 United Nations Conference on International Organization, 467–71.Google Scholar

‘Proposals of the Delegation of the Republic of Bolivia for the Organization of a System of Peace and Security’, Doc. 2, G/14(r), 1945, 3 UNCIO, 578–86.Google Scholar

‘Proposed Amendments to the Dumbarton Oaks Proposals Submitted by the Philippine Delegation’, Doc. 2, G/14(k), 1945, 3 UNCIO, 536–40.Google Scholar

Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1949), 179.Google Scholar

‘Report of Mr Paul-Boncour, Rapporteur, on Chapter VIII, Section B’, Doc. 881 III/3/46, 12 UNCIO, 505.Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 8 June 1981 from the Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/14510 (1981).Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 9 December 1982 from the Chargé d’Affaires A.I. of the Permanent Mission of Lesotho to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/15515.Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 23 December 1985 from the Permanent Representative of Lesotho to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/17692 (1985).Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 19 April 1988 from the Permanent Representative of Tunisia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/19798 (1988).Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 9 June 2008 from the Permanent Representative of Djibouti to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 11 June 2008, UN Doc. S/2008/381.Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Letter dated 4 June 2010 from the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/2010/281.Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Note by the President of the Security Council’, 6 April 1993, UN Doc. S/25539.Google Scholar

Security Council, ‘Report of the Security Council Special Mission established under Resolution 326 (1973)’, UN Doc. S/10896/Rev.1 (1973), SCOR, 28th Year, Special Supp. No. 2.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 82 (1950) concerning the Complaint of Aggression upon the Republic of Korea, 25 June 1950, UN Doc. S/RES/82.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 83 (1950) concerning the Complaint of Aggression upon the Republic of Korea, 27 June 1950, UN Doc. S/RES/83.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 84 (1950) concerning the Complaint of Aggression upon the Republic of Korea, 27 June 1950, UN Doc. S/RES/84.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 85 (1950) concerning the Complaint of Aggression upon the Republic of Korea, 31 July 1950, UN Doc. S/RES/85.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 178 (1963) concerning Complaint by Senegal, 24 April 1963, UN Doc. S/RES/178.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 204 (1965) concerning Complaint by Senegal, 19 May 1965, UN Doc. S/RES/204.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 228 (1966) concerning the Palestine Question, 25 November 1966, UN Doc. S/RES/228.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 248 (1968) concerning the Middle East, 24 March 1968, UN Doc. S/RES/248.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 262 (1968) concerning the Middle East, 31 December 1968, UN Doc. S/RES/262.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 265 (1969) concerning the Middle East, 1 April 1969, UN Doc. S/RES/265.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 268 (1969) concerning Complaint by Zambia, 28 July 1969, UN Doc. S/RES/268.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 270 (1969) concerning the Middle East, 26 August 1969, UN Doc. S/RES/270.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 273 (1969) concerning Complaints by Senegal, 9 December 1969, UN Doc. S/RES/273.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 275 (1969) concerning Complaint by Guinea, 22 December 1969, UN Doc. S/RES/275.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 280 (1970) concerning the Situation in Middle East, 19 May 1970, UN Doc. S/RES/280.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 289 (1970) concerning Complaint by Guinea, 23 November 1970, UN Doc. S/RES/289.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 290 (1970) concerning Complaint by Guinea, 8 December 1970, UN Doc. S/RES/290.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 294 (1971) concerning Complaint by Senegal, 15 July 1971, UN Doc. S/RES/294.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 302 (1971) concerning Complaint by Senegal, 24 November 1971, UN Doc. S/RES/302.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 313 (1972) concerning the Middle East, 28 February 1972, UN Doc. S/RES/313.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 316 (1972) concerning the Middle East, 26 June 1972, UN Doc. S/RES/316.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 321 (1972) concerning Complaint by Senegal, 23 October 1972, UN Doc. S/RES/321.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 326 (1973) concerning Provocation by Southern Rhodesia, 2 February 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/326.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 328 (1973) concerning Southern Rhodesia, 10 March 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/328.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 332 (1973) concerning the Situation in Middle East, 21 April 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/332.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 347 (1974) concerning Israel and Lebanon, 24 April 1974, UN Doc. S/RES/347.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 366 (1974) concerning Namibia, 17 December 1974, UN Doc. S/RES/366.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 385 (1976) concerning Namibia, 30 January 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/385.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 386 (1976) concerning Mozambique and Southern Rhodesia, 17 March 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/386.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 387 (1976) concerning Angola and South Africa, 31 March 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/387.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 393 (1976) concerning South Africa and Zambia, 30 July 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/393.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 405 (1977) concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 411 (1977) concerning Mozambique and Southern Rhodesia, 30 June 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/411.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 418 (1977) concerning South Africa, 4 November 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/418.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 419 (1977) concerning Benin, 24 November 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/419.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 423 (1978) concerning Southern Rhodesia, 14 March 1978, UN Doc. S/RES/423.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 424 (1978) concerning Southern Rhodesia and Zambia, 17 March 1978, UN Doc. S/RES/424.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 425 (1978) concerning Israel and Lebanon, 19 March 1978, UN Doc. S/RES/425.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 428 (1978) concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 May 1978, UN Doc. S/RES/428.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 445 (1979) concerning Southern Rhodesia, 8 March 1979, UN Doc. S/RES/445.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 447 (1979) concerning Angola and South Africa, 28 March 1979, UN Doc. S/RES/447.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 450 (1979) concerning Israel and Lebanon, 14 June 1979, UN Doc. S/RES/450.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 454 (1979) concerning Angola and South Africa, 2 November 1979, UN Doc. S/RES/454.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 455 (1979) concerning Southern Rhodesia and Zambia, 23 November 1979, UN Doc. S/RES/455.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 475 (1980) concerning Angola and South Africa, 27 June 1980, UN Doc. S/RES/475.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 487 (1981) concerning Iraq and Israel, 19 June 1981, UN Doc. S/RES/487.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 496 (1981) concerning Seychelles, 15 December 1981, UN Doc. S/RES/496.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 507 (1972) concerning UN Doc. S/RES 507 (1972).Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 527 (1982) concerning Lesotho and South Africa, 15 December 1982, UN Doc. S/RES/527.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 532 (1983) concerning Namibia, 31 May 1983, UN Doc. S/RES/532.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 535 (1983) concerning Lesotho and South Africa, 29 June 1983, UN Doc. S/RES/535.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 539 (1983) concerning Namibia, 28 October 1983, UN Doc. S/RES/539.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 545 (1983) concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 December 1983, UN Doc. S/RES/545.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 546 (1984) concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 January 1984, UN Doc. S/RES/546.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 554 (1984) concerning South Africa, 17 August 1984, UN Doc. S/RES/554.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 566 (1985) concerning Namibia, 19 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/566.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 567 (1985) concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/567.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 568 (1985) concerning Botswana and South Africa, 21 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/568.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 571 (1985) concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/571.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 572 (1985) concerning Botswana and South Africa, 30 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/572.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 573 (1985) concerning Israel and Tunisia, 4 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/573.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 574 (1985) concerning Angola and South Africa, 7 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/574.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 577 (1985) concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 December 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/577.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 580 (1985) concerning Lesotho and South Africa, 30 December 1980, UN Doc. S/RES/580.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 581 (1986) concerning South Africa, 13 February 1986, UN Doc. S/RES/581.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 601 (1987) concerning Namibia, 30 October 1987, UN Doc. S/RES/601.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 602 (1987) concerning Angola and South Africa, 25 November 1987, UN Doc. S/RES/602.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 606 (1987) concerning Angola and South Africa, 23 December 1987, UN Doc. S/RES/606.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 611 (1988) concerning Israel and Tunisia, 25 April 1988, UN Doc. S/RES/611.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 660 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 2 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/660.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 661 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 6 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/661.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 662 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 9 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/662.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 665 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 25 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/665.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 667 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 670 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 25 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/670.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 674 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 29 October 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/674.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 678 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 29 November 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/678.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 808 (1993) concerning the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 22 February 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/808.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 822 (1993) concerning Armenia and Azerbaijan, 30 April 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/822.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 853 (1993) concerning Armenia and Azerbaijan, 29 July 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/853.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 884 (1993) concerning Armenia and Azerbaijan, 12 November 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/884.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 955 (1994) concerning the Establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and adoption of the Statute of the Tribunal, 8 November 1994, UN Doc. S/RES/955.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1234 (1999) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 9 April 1999, UN Doc. S/RES/1234.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1304 (2000) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 16 June 2000, UN Doc. S/RES/1304.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1332 (2000) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 14 December 2000, UN Doc. S/RES/1332.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1341 (2001) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 22 February 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1341.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1355 (2001) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 15 June 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1355.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1862 (2009) concerning Peace and Security in Africa, 14 January 2009, UN Doc. S/RES/1862.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1907 (2009) concerning Peace and Security in Africa, 23 December 2009, UN Doc. S/RES/1907.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 2023 (2011) concerning Peace and Security in Africa, 5 December 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/2023.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 2036 (2012) concerning Somalia, 22 February 2012, UN Doc. S/RES/2036.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 2093 (2013) concerning Somalia, 6 March 2013, UN Doc. S/RES/2093.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 2124 (2013) concerning Somalia, 12 November 2013, UN Doc. S/RES/2124.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2 March 2005, UN Doc. S/PRST/2005/10.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 25 January 2006, UN Doc. S/PRST/2006/4.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning Peace and Security in Africa, 12 June 2008, UN Doc. S/PRST/2008/20.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning the Letter dated 4 June 2010 from the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2010/281) and other relevant letters, 9 July 2010, UN Doc. S/PRST/2010/13.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council, 9 July 2010, UN Doc. S/PRST/2010/13.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning the situation in the Middle East, 10 July 2013, UN Doc. S/PRST/2013/9.Google Scholar

Security Council, Statement by the President of the Security Council concerning the Middle East, 19 March 2015, UN Doc. S/PRST/2015/7.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2036th Meeting, 24 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2036.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2037th Meeting, 25 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2037.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2038th Meeting, 25 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2038.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2039th Meeting, 26 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2039.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2040th Meeting, 26 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2040.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2042nd Meeting, 28 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2042.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2043rd Meeting, 28 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2043.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2044th Meeting, 31 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2044.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2045th Meeting, 31 October 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2045.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2046th Meeting, 4 November 1977, UN Doc. S/PV.2046.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2548th Meeting, 16 August 1984, UN Doc. S/PV.2548.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2549th Meeting, 16 August 1984, UN Doc. S/PV.2549.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2050th Meeting, 17 August 1984, UN Doc. S/PV.2550.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2171st Meeting, 23 November 1979, UN Doc. S/PV.2171.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2406th Meeting, 14 December 1982, UN Doc. S/PV.2406.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2551st Meeting, 17 August 1984, UN Doc. S/PV.2551.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2638th Meeting, 30 December 1985, UN Doc. S/PV.2638.Google Scholar

Security Council, 2807th Meeting, 21 April 1988, UN Doc. S/PV.2807.Google Scholar

‘Verbatim Minutes of the First Meeting of Commission III’, Doc. 943 III/5, 1945, 11 UNCIO, 17.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organisations, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 2nd rev. edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Corten, O., The Law Against War. The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace, vol. I (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V., International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Eritrea–Ethiopia Armed Conflict’, in de Guttry, A., Post, H. H. G. and Venturini, G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia: An International Legal Perspective (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 243–58.Google Scholar

Gray, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Use of Force’, in Tams, C. J. and Sloan, J. (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2013), 237–61.Google Scholar

Hexner, E. P., ‘Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public International Organisations’, in Engel, S. and Metall, R. A. (eds.), Law, State and International Legal Order: Essays in Honor of Hans Kelsen (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1964), 119–38.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the “Principle of the Non-Use of Force”’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 561–604.Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V. and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (10 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 47–59.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 154 (1977), 236–361.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The Definition of Aggression: Extracts from Speech Delivered in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly by the Representative of the United Kingdom, Mr. G. G. Fitzmaurice, C.M.G., on January, 9, 1952’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1 (1952), 137–44.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, American Journal of International Law, 86 (1992), 46–92.Google Scholar

Hogan-Doran, J. and van Ginkel, B. T., ‘Aggression as a Crime under International Law and the Prosecution of Individuals by the Proposed International Criminal Court’, Netherlands International Law Review, 43 (1996), 321–51.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–1217.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189–207.Google Scholar

Talmon, S., ‘The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58 (2009), 493–517.Google Scholar

Tams, C. J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 359–97.Google Scholar

Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 81 (1952), 451–517.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Armed Activities case) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Oil Platforms case) (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua case) (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1949), 4.Google Scholar

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) (Preliminary Objections), ICJ Reports (1998), 432.Google Scholar

House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Wall case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Nuclear Weapons case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, adopted 19 June 2000.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, Canada – Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain, WT/DS276/AB/R, adopted 27 September 2004.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, United States – Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India, WT/DS33/AB/R, adopted 23 May 1997.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 March 2005.Google Scholar

Convention between Czechoslovakia, Romania, Turkey, the USSR and Yugoslavia concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 4 July 1933), 148 LNTS 211.Google Scholar

Convention between the USSR and Lithuania concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 5 July 1933), 148 LNTS 79.Google Scholar

Draft Act Relating to the Definition of Aggression presented by the Committee on Security Questions to the General Commission of the League of Nations Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments on 24 May 1933, League Document 1935.IX.4.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (Articles on State Responsibility), Yb ILC (2001), vol. II, part 2, 26, adopted by General Assembly, Responsibility of State for International Wrongful Acts, 28 January 2002, UN Doc. A/RES/56/83.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, Yb ILC (1996), vol. I., 239 (including commentary).Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment, 1 October 1946, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 172.Google Scholar

Treaty of Non-Aggression and Pacific Settlement of Disputes Between Finland and the USSR (signed 21 January 1932), 157 LNTS 393.Google Scholar

Wood, M., ‘Second Report on Identification of International Customary Law, International Law Commission’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/672, 22 May 2014.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘International Crimes of States’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), 405–14.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Special Rapporteur, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4, Yb ILC (2000), vol. II, part 1, 3.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 7 December 1987, UN Doc. A/RES/42/151.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 10 December 1981, UN Doc. A/RES/36/106.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Peace Through Deeds, 17 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/380(V).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Twenty-Eighth Session, 3 May–23 July 1976’, UN Doc. A/31/10, Yb ILC (1976), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Thirty-Fifth Session, 3 May–22 July 1983’, UN Doc. A/38/10, Yb ILC (1983) vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Third Session, 29 April–19 July 1991’, UN Doc. A/46/10, Yb ILC (1991), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Sixth Session, 2 May–22 July 1994’, UN Doc. A/49/10, Yb ILC (1994), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Seventh Session, 2 May–21 July 1995’, UN Doc. A/50/10, Yb ILC (1995), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Eighth Session, 6 May–26 July 1996’, UN Doc. A/51/10, Yb ILC (1996), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Third Session, 23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001’, UN Doc. A/56/10, Yb ILC (2001), vol. II, part 2, 1.Google Scholar

Riphagen, W., ‘Fifth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility (Part 2 of the Draft Articles)’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/380, Yb ILC (1984), vol. II, part 1, 1.Google Scholar

Thiam, D., Special Rapporteur, ‘Second Report on the Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/377, Yb ILC (1984), vol. II, Part I, 89.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History (New York: Transnational, 1998).Google Scholar

Sadat, L. N. (ed.), Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Article 121’, in Triffterer, O. and Ambos, K. (eds.), Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edn (München, Oxford, Baden-Baden: Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2016), 2298–304.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the International Criminal Court’, in Doria, J., Gasser, H-P. and Bassiouni, M. C. (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 661–99.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, in Stahn, C. and El Zeidy, M. M. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, vol. 2 (2 vols., Cambridge University Press, 2011), 721–44.Google Scholar

Fife, R. E., ‘Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States’, in Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 53–74.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘National Legislation on Individual Responsibility for Conduct Amounting to Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 547–78.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Nuremberg and the Crime against Peace’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 527–50.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Ambiguities in Article 5(2), 121 and 123 of the Rome Statute’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 413–27.Google Scholar

Fernandez de Gurmendi, S. A., ‘The Working Group on Aggression at the Preparatory Commission of the International Criminal Court’, Fordham International Law Journal, 25 (2001), 589–605.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal, ‘International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment and Sentences’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947) 172–333.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P. and Holmes, J. T., ‘The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process’, American Journal of International Law, 93 (1999), 2–11.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D. J., ‘Staying the Course with the International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal, 35 (2002), 47–100.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Establishment of an International Criminal Court, 9 December 1994, UN Doc. A/RES/49/53.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Establishment of an International Criminal Court, 11 December 1995, UN Doc. A/RES/50/46.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Establishment of an International Criminal Court, 28 January 1998, UN Doc. A/RES/52/160.Google Scholar

International Association of Penal Law, International Institute for Higher Studies in Criminal Sciences, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, ‘Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court – Alternative to the ILC Draft’ (Siracusa Draft) (Siracusa/Freiburg, July 1995).Google Scholar

ILC, Report of the International Law Commission, 5 UN GAOR, Supp. No. 12 (A/1316) (1950).Google Scholar

United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Rome, 15 June–17 July 1998, Official Records (New York: United Nations, 2002), vols. I–III.Google Scholar