Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ley-Borrás, Roberto 2015. Deciding on the Decision Situation to Analyze: The Critical First Step of a Decision Analysis. Decision Analysis, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 46.

    Owen, Daniel 2015. Collaborative Decision Making. Decision Analysis, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    Abdelrahman, Mahmoud Papamichail, K. Nadia and French, Simon 2014. Building a Competitive Public Sector with Knowledge Management Strategy. p. 326.

    Tani, Steven N. and Parnell, Gregory S. 2013. Handbook of Decision Analysis. p. 92.

    von Winterfeldt, Detlof 2013. Providing a decision focus for global systems analysis. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Vol. 1, Issue. 1-2, p. 99.

    Keisler, Jeffrey M. and Noonan, Patrick S. 2012. Communicating Analytic Results: A Tutorial for Decision Consultants. Decision Analysis, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 274.

    de Lima, Alexsandro Souza and de Sousa Damiani, Jose Henrique 2009. A proposed method for modeling research and development (R&D) project prioritization criteria. p. 599.

  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: June 2012

22 - Building Decision Competency in Organizations


ABSTRACT. Decision analysis was introduced about 40 years ago. Since that time the practice of decision consultants, whether internal or external to organizations, has expanded from analytical support in difficult decisions to designing governance and decision systems and transforming enterprise capabilities. Organizations realize a significant positive impact when they develop true decision competency – that is, when high-quality decision making becomes part of their organizational DNA. In this chapter, the author first defines organizational decision competency and then describes how to achieve this competency. He describes two cases of two large corporations that have achieved a high level of decision competency. He concludes with a perspective on the first 40 years of corporate adoption of decision competencies that still has a long way to go.


In the mid-1960s, Ronald Howard and James Matheson formed the Decision Analysis Group at Stanford Research Institute with the vision of creating a “teaching hospital” for decision analysis, a then-emerging discipline. Their goal was to advance the practice of decision analysis and build professional competency in the discipline among SRI's clients. Initially, decision analysis practitioners used a systems engineering approach based on normative decision science to identify the optimal choice among a set of alternatives in the light of real-world uncertainty, dynamics, and complexity. As the discipline evolved, it incorporated various methods from the behavioral decision sciences to deal with biases and to obtain organizational alignment with commitment to effective action.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Advances in Decision Analysis
  • Online ISBN: 9780511611308
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *