Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:41:53.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Ward Edwards ,
Ralph F. Miles Jr.  and
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Edited by
Ward Edwards ,
Ralph F. Miles Jr.  and
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Ward Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
Ralph F. Miles Jr.
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Affiliation:
Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California
Ralph F. Miles Jr.
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

This first chapter of Advances in Decision Analysis presents definitions for decision analysis that will be used consistently throughout this volume and provides a list of references on the subject of decision analysis. As this is an edited volume on “advances” in decision analysis, it is assumed that the reader is familiar with the subject to the level presented in one or more of the introductory decision analysis texts listed in the Preface.

This book attempts to maintain consistent distinctions among normative, prescriptive, and descriptive decision theories—distinctions that we find inconsistent in the literature. There is a rich and related literature on microeconomics, decision theory, behavioral psychology, and management science, which is only touched on in the following chapters.

Advances in Decision Analysis presents methodologies and applications of decision analysis as derived from prescriptive decision theory. Each of the first six parts of the book concentrates on different aspects of decision analysis. Part VII is devoted to applications of decision analysis.

The Rational Decision Maker

Many books in economics and decision analysis propose theories and methodologies that claim to be “rational.” Philosophers disagree on what is rational (Mele and Rawling 2004; Searle 2001). Many decision theories define the “rational decision maker” through mathematical principles or axioms, which, if combined, imply rational behavior (e.g., to maximize expected utility). But how compelling are these axioms? We would be remiss not to define what we mean by rationality.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Decision Analysis
From Foundations to Applications
 , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allais, M., and Hagen, O. (Eds.). (1979). Expected utility hypothesis and the Allais paradox. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values. (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M., and Hurley, S. (Eds.). (1991). Foundations of decision theory: Issues and advances. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baird, B. F. (1989). Managerial decisions under uncertainty. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bayes, T. (1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Published posthumously in 1763 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 53, 370–418 and 54, 296–325. Reprinted in 1958 in Biometrica, 45, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. (1998). Judgment in managerial decision making. (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bell, D. E., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (Eds.). (1977). Conflicting objectives in decisions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1988). Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. E., and Schleifer, A. Jr. (1995). Decision making under uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Course Technology.Google Scholar
Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardo, J. M., and Smith, A. F. M. (1994). Bayesian theory. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii academiae scientiarum imperiales petropolitanae, 5, 175–192. Translated into English by L. Sommer in 1954. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, XⅫ, 23–36.Google Scholar
Berry, D. A. (1996). Statistics: A Bayesian perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, R. V. (2005). Tools of rational choice. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, R. V., Kahr, A. S., and Peterson, C. (1974). Decision analysis for the manager. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Bunn, D. V. (1984). Applied decision analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis. (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Dale, A. I. (1999). A history of inverse probability. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., McKinsey, J. C. C., and Suppes, P. (1955). Outlines of a formal theory of value. Philosophy of Science, 22, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1931). Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità. Fundamenta mathematicae, 17, 298–329. Translated into English in 1993 in Monari, P. and Cocchi, D. (Eds.). On the subjective meaning of probability. Probabilitá e induzione. Bologna: Clueb, pp. 291–321.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1937). La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales del'Institut Henri Poincaré, 7, 1–68. Translated with corrections by H. E. Kyburg, Jr. Foresight. Its logical laws, its subjective sources. In Kyburg, H. E. Jr. and Smokler, H. E. (Eds.). (1980). Studies in subjective probability. (2nd ed.). Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 53–111.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. S., and Miles, R. F. Jr. (1976). An actual application of collective choice theory to the selection of trajectories for the Mariner Jupiter/Saturn 1977 Project. Operations Research, 24, 220–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, W. (Ed.). (1992). Utility theory: Measurements and applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, W., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1967). Decision Making: Selected Readings. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Eells, E. (1982). Rational decision and causality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, E., and Skyrms, B. (Eds.). (1994). Probability and conditionals: Belief revision and rational decision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1964). Decision and value theory. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Utility theory. Management Science, 14, 335–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1988). Nonlinear preference and utility theory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A., and Purves, R. A. (1969). Bayes' method for bookies. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 1177–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, S. (Ed.). (1989). Readings in decision analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P., and Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.). (1988). Decision, probability, and utility: Selected readings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., and Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolkit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gill, J. (2002). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, A. L. (1997). Decision analysis: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P., and Wright, G. (1991). Decision analysis for management judgment. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2003. What conditional probability could not be. Synthese, 137, 273–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
HBS. Harvard Business School Publishing. (2001). Harvard Business Review on decision making. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J. (2001). Introduction to operations research. (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hoch, S. J., and Kunreuther, H. C. (Eds.). (2001). Wharton on making decisions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hogarth, R. M. (1990). Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, C. A., Leach, J. J., and McClennen, E. F. (Eds.). (1978). Foundations and applications of decision theory. Vol. I: Theoretical foundations. Vol. II: Epistemic and social applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A. (1965). Bayesian decision models for system engineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernectics, SSC-1, pp. 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. A. (1966). Decision analysis: Applied decision theory. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Operational Research. New York: John Wiley, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A. (Ed.). (1968). Special issue on decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-4. New York: IEEE.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A. (1968a). The foundations of decision analysis. In Howard, R. A., (1968). Special issue on decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-4. New York: IEEE, pp. 211–219.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A. (1983). The evolution of decision analysis. In Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E. (Eds.). (1983). The principles and applications of decision analysis. Vol. I: General collection, Vol. II: Professional collection. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group, pp. 5–15.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E. (Eds.). (1983a). The principles and applications of decision analysis. Vol. I: General collection, Vol. II: Professional collection. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group.Google Scholar
INFORMS. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Hanover, MD.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co. Reprinted in 1995 with new footnotes as: Pragmatism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1983). The logic of decision. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1992). Probability and the art of judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J. M. (1999). The foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason. Translated in 1900 by J. M. D. Meiklejohn. London: Colonial Press. Reprinted in 2003 by Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, p. 449.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. (1996). Decision theory as philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. L. (1978). Decision analysis. In Moder, J. J. and Elmaghraby, S. E. (Eds.), Handbook of operations research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 423–450.Google Scholar
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. G. (1955). Fair bets and inductive probabilities. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, C. W. (1997). Strategic decision making: Multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson International.Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Decision sciences: An integrative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1988). Notes on the theory of choice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H. E. Jr., and Teng, C. M. (2001). Uncertain inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyburg, H. E. Jr., and Thalos, M. (Eds.). (2003). Probability is the very guide of life. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lehman, R. S. (1955). On confirmation and rational betting. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, T., and Hsu, J. S. J. (1999). Bayesian Methods: An analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1986). Hard choices: Decision making under unresolved conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, D. V. (1985). Making decisions. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: John Wiley. Reprinted in 2005 by John Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. (2003). Rationality in choice under certainty and uncertainty. In Schneider, S. L. and Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–83.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lusted, L. B. (1968). Introduction to medical decision making. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
Maher, P. (1993). Betting on theories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, K. T., and Oliver, R. M. (1995). Decision making and forecasting: With emphasis on model building and policy analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1990). Rationality and dynamic choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, A. R., and Rawling, P. (Eds.). (2004). The Oxford handbook of rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, R. F. Jr. (1973). Systems concepts: Lectures on contemporary approaches to systems. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302. Reprinted in 1955 in Buchler, J. (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications, pp. 23–41. Reprinted in 1992 in Houser, N. and Klosel, C.. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1: 1867–1893). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 124–141.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. W., Raiffa, H., and Schlaifer, R. (1995). Introduction to statistical decision theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (1993). Generalized expected utility theory: The rank-dependent model. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H., and Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and probability. In Braithwaite, R. B. (Ed.) (1931). Foundations of mathematics and other essays. London: Routledge & P. Kegan, pp. 156–198. Reprinted in 1980 in Kyburg, H. E. Jr. and Smokler, H. E. (Eds.), Studies in subjective probability (2nd ed.). Huntington, NY: R. E. Krieger Publishing, pp. 23–52 Reprinted in 1990 in Mellor, D. H. (Ed.), Philosophical Papers: F. P. Ramsey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–109Google Scholar
Resnik, M. D. (1987). Choices: An introduction to decision theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Robert, C. P. (2001). The Bayesian choice. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps: Ten barriers to brilliant decision-making and how to overcome them. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley. Reprinted in 1972. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Schlaifer, R. (1959). Probability and statistics for business decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shanteau, J., Mellers, B. A., and Schum, D. (Eds.). (1999). Decision science and technology: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimony, A. (1955). Coherence and the axioms of confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1987). Dynamic coherence and probability kinematics. Philosophy of Science, 54, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1990). The dynamics of rational deliberation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1993). Discussion: A mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?Philosophy of Science, 60, 320–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, J. H. (1994). Taking chances: Essays on rational choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stigum, B. P., and Wenstøp, F. (Eds.). (1983). Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1973). Conditionalization and observation. Synthese, 26, 218–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1976). Conditionalization, observation, and change of preference. In Harper, W. and Hooker, C. (Eds.), Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing, pp. 205–253.Google Scholar
Thrall, R. M., Coombs, C. H., and Davis, R. L. (Eds.). (1954). Decision processes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J., Morgenstern, and O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive Representations of Preferences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S. R., and Buede, D. M. (1987). Decision synthesis: The principles and practice of decision analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weirich, P. (2001). Decision space: Multidimensional utility analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeckhauser, R. J., Keeney, R. L., and Sebenius, J. K. (1996). Wise choices: Decisions, games, and negotiations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, A. (1971). An introduction to Bayesian inference in econometrics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×