Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction: Organizational Community Engagement over Time
- Part II University–Community Partnerships
- Part III Disciplinary Outreach
- Part IV Interdisciplinary Outreach
- Part V Leading Community Engagement Efforts
- 15 Leading Social Innovation and Community Engagement
- 16 Community-Based Partnerships for Capacity Building
- 17 “Make the World a Better Place”
- Part VI Putting It All Together
- Appendix A: Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
17 - “Make the World a Better Place”
Local Leadership as a Vehicle for Personal and Community Development
from Part V - Leading Community Engagement Efforts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction: Organizational Community Engagement over Time
- Part II University–Community Partnerships
- Part III Disciplinary Outreach
- Part IV Interdisciplinary Outreach
- Part V Leading Community Engagement Efforts
- 15 Leading Social Innovation and Community Engagement
- 16 Community-Based Partnerships for Capacity Building
- 17 “Make the World a Better Place”
- Part VI Putting It All Together
- Appendix A: Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ahmed, S. M., Beck, B., Maurana, A., & Newton, G. (2004). Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Education for Health, 17(2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (2000). Leadership reconsidered: Engaging education in social change. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education: Service Learning. Paper 144. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/144.Google Scholar
Attree, P., French, B., Milton, B., Povall, S., Whitehead, M., & Popay, J. (2011). The experience of community engagement for individuals: A rapid review of evidence. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19(3), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.Google Scholar
Bonsall, D. L., Harris, R. A., & Marczak, J. N. (2002). The community as a classroom. New Directions for Student Services, 2002(100), 85–96.Google Scholar
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516.Google Scholar
Bruning, S. D., McGrew, S., & Cooper, M. (2006). Town–gown relationships: Exploring university–community engagement from the perspective of community members. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 125–130.Google Scholar
Buys, N., & Bursnall, S. (2007). Establishing university–community partnerships: Processes and benefits. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2006). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2005 edition. Menlo Park, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. G., Kotval-K, Z., Kotval, Z., & Mullin, J. (2014). University community partnerships. Humanities, 3(1), 88–101.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, A. (2009). Carnegie’s new community engagement classification: Affirming higher education’s role in community. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 5–12.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Todd, A. R., Homan, A. C. et al. (2015). Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 742–748.Google Scholar
Holland, B. A., & Gelmon, S. B. (1998). The state of the “engaged campus”: What have we learned about building and sustaining university–community partnerships. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 51, 3–6.Google Scholar
Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high‐technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. J., Johnson, D. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19(19), R911–R916.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In Sternberg, R. J. & Zhang, L. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking style (pp. 227–247), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurrasse, D. J. (2013). Strategic public private partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.Google Scholar
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Davis, M. I., Ferrari, J. et al. (2004). University–community partnerships: A framework and an exemplar. In Jason, L., Keys, C., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Taylor, R. R., Davis, M., Durlak, J., & Isenberg, D. (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theory and methods in action (pp. 105–120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.Google Scholar
Wilson, P., Woolger, A., & Dodd, M. (2017). Students: Experience, engagement and communities (report to HEFCE by York Consulting, Leeds; York Consulting LLP). Retrieved from www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2017/Students,Experience,engagement,and,communities/studentseec.pdf.Google Scholar
Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar