Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:12:08.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Event-Related Potential (ERP) Measures in Visual Development Research

from SECTION ONE - CENTRAL SYSTEM: THEORY, METHODS, AND MEASURES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Michelle de Haan
Affiliation:
Reader and Honorary Principal Neuropsychologist Institute of Child Health, University College London
Louis A. Schmidt
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Sidney J Segalowitz
Affiliation:
Brock University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Visual abilities undergo major transformation during infancy and childhood. Although infants arrive in the world both able to see and to learn about what they see, many aspects of vision and visual cognition continue to develop well into childhood (e.g., Chung & Thomson, 1995; Lewis & Maurer, 2005). Event-related potentials (ERPs) are a useful tool for investigating the neurophysiological correlates of these developmental changes as they can provide information not available from behavioral measures alone. In particular, they provide precise information about the timing and some information about the spatial distribution of the brain events underlying visual processing. Since ERPs can be obtained in “passive” tasks, where participants simply look at visual displays without any requirement to make a verbal or behavioral response, they allow use of the same procedure across a wide range of age and ability levels. For example, visual ERPs have been used to study face processing in infants only a few months old (e.g., Halit, de Haan, & Johnson, 2003) and have been used to investigate aspects of visual processing in children with various developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (e.g., Dawson et al., 2002; Kemner, van der Gaag, Verbaten & van Engeland, 1999), Down syndrome (e.g., Karrer et al., 1998), and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (reviewed in Barry, Johnstone, & Clarke, 2003). Along with these distinct advantages, however, ERPs also present challenges both in terms of experimental design and data collection, and analysis and interpretation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Developmental Psychophysiology
Theory, Systems, and Methods
, pp. 103 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, T., Wood, C. C., & McCarthy, G. (1986). The central nervous system. In Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Porges, S. W. (Eds). Psychophysiology: Systems, processes and applications (pp. 5–25). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Apkarian, P., Mirmiran, M., & Tijssen, R. (1991). Effects of behavioral state on visual processing in neonates. Neuropediatrics, 22, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddelely, A., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Mishkin, M. (2001). Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for semantic memory?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, R. J., Johnstone, S. J., & Clarke, A. R. (2003). A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II Event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellugi, U., & Wang., P. P. (1998). Williams syndrome: From cognition to brain to gene. In Edelman, G. & Smith, B. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., Wang, P. P., & Jernigan, T. L. (1994). Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In Broman, S. H. & Grafman, J. (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders (pp. 23–56) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E. et al. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, M. S., & Thomson, D. M. (1985). Development of face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 55–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courchesne, E. (1978). Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: Changes in long-latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 468–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G., Tucker, L. A., & Johnson, M. H. (1998). Neural correlates of saccade planning in infants: A high density ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, G., Carver, L., Meltzoff, A. N., Panagiotides, H., McPartland, J., & Webb, S. J. (2002). Neural correlates of face and object recognition in young children with autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay and typical development. Child Development, 73, 700–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, G., Webb, S. J., & McPartland, J. (2005). Understanding the nature of face processing impairment in autism: Insights from behavioural and electrophysiological studies. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Boer, T., Scott, L. S., & Nelson, C. A. (2007). Methods for acquiring and analysing infant event-related potentials. In Haan, M. (Ed.), Infant EEG and Event-Related Potentials. (pp. 5–37). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
de Haan, M. (2007). Visual attention and recognition memory in infancy. In Haan, M. (Ed.), Infant EEG and event-related potentials. (pp. 101–143). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haan, M., Belsky, J., Reid, V., Volein, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2004). Maternal personality and infants' neural and visual responsivity to facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45, 1209–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1997). Recognition of the mother's face by 6-month-old infants: A neurobehavioral study. Child Development, 68, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1999). Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1113–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haan, M., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Schonen, S., Gil de Diaz, M. & Mathivet, E. (1986). Hemispheric asymmetry in face processing in infancy. In Ellis, H. D., Jeeves, M. A., Newcombe, F., & Young, A. (Eds), Aspects of face processing (pp. 199–208). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dien, J. (1998). Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations. Behavior, Research Methods, Instrumentation & Computers, 30, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duzel, E., Vargha-Khadem, F., Heinze, H. J., & Mishkin, M. (2001). Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 8101–8106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggermont, J. J. (1998). On the rate of maturation of sensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimer, M. (2000a). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport, 11, 2319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimer, M. (2000b). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimer, M. (2000c). Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliga, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2005). Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1328–1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, D. Z., Shapiro, E. G., & Nelson, C. A. (2004). Measurement of vigilance in 2-year-old children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 227–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, S. J., Spratling, M. W., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Halit, H., Csibra, G., Haan, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2001). Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome. NeuroReport, 12, 2697–2700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halit, H., Haan, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2003). Cortical specialisation for face processing: Face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3 and 12 month old infants. Neuroimage, 19, 1180–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. H., Haan, M., Hatzakis, H., Oliver, A., Smith, W., Tucker, L. A., & Csibra, G. (2001). Recording and analyzing high density event-related potentials with infants using the Geodesic Sensor Net. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 295–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karrer, J. H., Karrer, R., Bloom, D., Chaney, L., & Davis, R. (1998). Event-related brain potentials during an extended visual recognition memory task depict delayed development of cerebral inhibitory processes among 6-month-old infants with Down syndrome. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 167–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karrer, R., & Monti, L. A. (1995). Event-related potentials of 4–7-week-old infants in a visual recognition memory task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 414–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemner, C., Gaag, R. J., Verbaten, M., & Engeland, H. (1999). ERP differences among subtypes of pervasive developmental disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 781–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leppanen, P. H., Guttorm, T. K., Pihko, E., Takkinen, S., Eklund, K. M., & Lyytinen, H. (2004). Maturational effects on newborn ERPs measured in the mismatch negativity paradigm. Experimental Neurology, 190 Suppl 1: S91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, T. L., & Maurer, D. (2005). Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: Evidence from visually deprived children. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T. P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Senjowski, T. J. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295, 690–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martynova, O., Kirjavainen, J., & Cheour, M. (2003). Mismatch negativity and late discriminative negativity in sleeping human newborns. Neuroscience Letters, 340, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCulloch, D. M. (2007). Visual evoked potentials in infants. In Haan, M. (Ed.) Infant EEG and event-related potentials. (pp. 39–76). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Molfese, D. L. (2000). Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal response. Brain and Language, 72, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molfese, V. J., Molfese, D. L., & Modgline, A. A. (2001). Newborn and preschool predictors of second-grade reading scores: An evaluation of categorical and continuous scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 545–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naatanen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H., Jiang, D., & Alho, K. (1993). Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 436–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, C. A., & Collins, P. F. (1991). Event-related potentials and looking-time analysis of infants' responses to familiar and novel events: Implications for recognition memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. A. & Collins, P. F. (1992). Neural and behavioural correlates of recognition memory in 4- and 8-month-old infants. Brain & Cognition, 19, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, C. A., & Monk, C. S. (2001). The use of event-related potentials in the study of cognitive development. In Nelson, C. A. & Luciana, M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 125–136). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nikkel, L., & Karrer, R. (1994). Differential effects of experience on the ERP and behaviour of 6-month-old infants: Trend during repeated stimulus presentations. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orekhova, E. V., Stroganova, T. A., & Posikera, I. N. (1999). Theta synchronization during sustained anticipatory attention in infants over the second half of the first year of life. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 151–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otero, G. A., Pliego-Rivero, F. B., Contreras, G., Ricardo, J., & Fernandez, T. (2004). Iron supplementation brings up a lacking P300 in iron deficient children. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2259–2266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penny, W. D., Kiebel, S. J., Kilner, J. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Neurosciences, 25, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponton, C. W., Moore, J. K., & Eggermont, J. J. (1999). Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: Evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scandinavian Auditory Suppl, 51, 13–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Richards, J. E. (2000). Localizing the development of covert attention in infants with scalp event-related potentials. Developmental Psychology, 36, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, J. E. (2003). Attention affects the recognition of briefly presented stimuli in infants: An ERP study. Developmental Science, 6, 312–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S. & Crommelink, M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport, 11, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, A. J., Saunders, K. J., & McCulloch, D. L. (1999). Effect of sleep state on the flash visual evoked potential – A case study. Doc. Ophthalmology, 98, 47–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Snyder, K., Webb, S., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Theoretical and methodological implications of variability in infant brain response during a recognition memory paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 466–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. J., & Baldeweg, T. (2002). Application of EEG, ERP and intracranial recordings to the investigation of cognitive function in children. Developmental Science, 5, 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. J., Batty, M., & Itier, R. J. (2004). The faces of development: A review of early face processing over childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1426–1442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. J., Itier, R. J., Allison, T., & Edmonds, G. E. (2001). Direction of gaze effects on early face processing: eyes-only versus full faces. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. J., McCarthy, G., Saliba, E., & Degiovanni, E. (1999). ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 910–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. J., & Pang, E. W. (1999). Developmental changes in early cognitive processes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Suppl., 49, 145–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsuneishi, S., & Casaer, J. (2000). Effects of preterm extrauterine visual experience on the development of the human visual system: A flash VEP study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 42, 663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., & Paesschen, W. (1997). Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science, 277, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughan, H. G., Jr, & Kurtzberg, D. (1992). Electrophysiologic indices of human brain maturation and cognitive development. In Gunnar, M. R. & Nelson, C. A. (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Yao, D., Wang, L., Oostenveld, R., Neilsen, K. D., Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Chen, C. A. N. (2005). A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: The issue of neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference. Physiological Measurement, 26, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×