Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
The Ethics of the Family in Seneca
  • Liz Gloyn, Royal Holloway, University of London

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Ethics of the Family in Seneca
    • Online ISBN: 9781316535820
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535820
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book is the first extensive study of the role of the family in the work of Seneca. It offers a new way of reading philosophy that combines philosophical analysis with social, cultural and historical factors to bring out the ways in which Stoicism presents itself as in tune with the universe. The family serves a central role in an individual's moral development - both the family as conventionally understood, and the wider conceptual family which Stoicism constructs. Innovative readings of Seneca's work bring out the importance of the family to his thought and how it interacts with other Stoic doctrines. We learn how to be virtuous from observing and imitating our family, who can be biological relatives or people we choose as our intellectual ancestors. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca will be of particular interest to researchers in Roman Stoicism, imperial culture and the history of the family.

Reviews

'This is a significant achievement and will be warmly appreciated by students of Seneca’s thought and of Roman social history alike.'

Brad Inwood Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Abel, K. 1967. Bauformen in Senecas Dialoge: Fünf Strukturanalysen: Dial. 6, 11, 12, 1 und 2. Heidelberg: Winter.
Albrecht, M. von. 2004. ‘Wort und Wandlung: Senecas Lebenkunst’, Mnemosyne Supplementum. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
Alexander, W. H. 1943. ‘Seneca’s Ad Polybium De Consolatione: A reappraisal’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada 37: 3355.
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) 1999. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, P. M. 2001. ‘Using the material and written sources: Turn of the millennium approaches to Roman domestic space’, American Journal of Archaeology 105: 181208.
Altman, J. G. 1982. Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 2006. ‘Speculum Neronis: Un mode spécifique de direction de conscience dans le De clementia de Sénèque’, Revue des Études Latines 84: 185201.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 2007. ‘Échos du Songe de Scipion chez Sénèque: La Géographie de la Consolation à Marcia 26.6 et des Questions Naturelles I Praef. 8–13’, in Andrés, G. H. and Fernández Corte, J. C. (eds.). Munus quaesitum meritis: Homenaje a Carmen Codoñer. Salamanca: University of Salamanca, 71–9.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 2008. ‘Imagination and meditation in Seneca: The example of praemeditatio’, in Fitch (2008: 102–13).
Armstrong, J. 2013. ‘“Bands of brothers”: Warfare and fraternity in early Rome’, Journal of Ancient History 1: 5369.
Asmis, E. 1982. ‘Lucretius’ Venus and the Stoic Zeus’, Hermes 110: 458–70.
Asmis, E. 1996. ‘The Stoics on women’, in Ward, J. (ed.). Feminism and Ancient Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge, 6892.
Atkinson, J. E. 1985. ‘Seneca’s Consolatio ad Polybium’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 32.2: 860–84.
Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) 2013. Blackwell Companion to Terence. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Babut, D. 1963. ‘Les Stoïciens et l’amour’, Revue des Études Grecques 76: 5563.
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1966. ‘Fabula Clodiana’, Historia 15: 6573.
Bannon, C. J. 1997. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) 1989. Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. 1997. Philosophia Togata ii: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. New York: Clarendon Press.
Baroin, C. 2010. ‘Remembering one’s ancestors, following in their footsteps, being like them: The role and forms of family memory in the building of identity’, in Dasen and Späth (2010: 19–48).
Barrett, A. A. 1989. Caligula: The Corruption of Power. London: Routledge.
Barrett, A. A. 2002. Livia: First Lady of Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bartman, E. 1999. Portraits of Livia: Imaging the Imperial Woman in Augustan Rome. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.) 2009. Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basore, J. W. 1935. Seneca: Moral Essays, Vol. iii: De Beneficiis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beard, M. 1985. ‘Writing and ritual: A study of diversity and expansion in the Arval Acta’, Papers of the British School at Rome 53: 114–62.
Beard, M. 1998. ‘Imaginary horti: Or, up the garden path’, in Cima and La Rocca (1998: 23–32).
Beard, M. 2002. ‘Ciceronian correspondence: Making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.). Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 103–44.
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome, Vol. i. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beckmann, M. 2009. ‘The significance of Roman imperial coin types’, Klio 91: 144–61.
Bellandi, F. 2004. ‘Epicuro, Seneca e il matrimonio del sapiens: Sul frammento 23 Vottero = 45 Haase del De matrimonio di Seneca’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 53: 175–82.
Bellincioni, M. (ed. and trans.) 1979. Lucio Anneo Seneca, Lettere a Lucilio: Libro XV, Le Lettere 94 e 95. Brescia: Paideia.
Bergmann, B. 1994. ‘The Roman house as memory theater’, Art Bulletin 74.2: 225–56.
Bernstein, N. W. 2008. ‘Each man’s father served as his teacher: Constructing relatedness in Pliny’s Letters’, Classical Antiquity 27: 203–30.
Bernstein, Neil Warren. 2009. ‘Adoptees and exposed children in Roman declamation: Commodification, luxury, and the threat of violence’, Classical Philology 104: 331–53.
Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul. Trans. Van Sickle, J.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bickel, E. 1915. Diatribe in Senecae philosophi fragmenta, Vol. i: Fragmenta de matrimonio. Leipzig: Teubner.
Bishop, J. D. 1985. Seneca’s Daggered Stylus: Political Code in the Tragedies. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain.
Blom, H. van der. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloomer, W. M. 1992. Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Bloomer, W. M. 2006. ‘The technology of child production: Eugenics and eulogics in the de liberis educandis’, Arethusa 39: 7199.
Bluestone, N. H. 1987. Women and the Ideal Society: Plato’s Republic and Modern Myths of Gender. Oxford: Berg.
Blundell, M. W. 1990. ‘Parental nature and Stoic oikeiosis’, Ancient Philosophy 10: 221–42.
Boatwright, M. T. 1998. ‘Luxuriant gardens and extravagant women: The horti of Rome between Republic and Empire’, in Cima and La Rocca (1998: 71–82).
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Boyle, A. J. (ed.) 1983. Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick, Victoria, Australia: Aureal.
Bradley, K. R. 1986. ‘Seneca and slavery’, Classica et Mediaevalia 37: 161–72.
Bradley, K. R. 1991a. Discovering the Roman Family: Studies in Roman Social History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bradley, K. R. 1991b. ‘Remarriage and the structure of the upper-class Roman family’, in Rawson (1991: 79–98).
Braund, S. (ed.) 2009. Seneca: De Clementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brennan, T. 1998. ‘The old Stoic theory of emotions’, in Sihvola and Engberg-Pedersen (1998: 21–70).
Brennan, T. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Briscoe, J. 1993. ‘Some notes on Valerius Maximus’, Sileno 19: 395408.
Brunschwig, J. 1986. ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield and Striker (1986: 113–44).
Cancik, H. 1967. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Hildesheim: Olms.
Cancik-Lindemaier, H. 1998. ‘Seneca’s collection of epistles: A medium of philosophical communication’, in Collins, A. Y. (ed.). Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture: Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 88109.
Cantarella, E. 2002. ‘Marriage and sexuality in republican Rome: A Roman conjugal love story’, in Nussbaum and Sihvola (2002: 269–82).
Cantarella, E. 2002–2003. ‘Fathers and sons in Rome’, Classical World 96: 281–98.
Carlon, J. M. 2009. Pliny’s Women: Constructing Virtue and Creating Identity in the Roman World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chaplin, J. D. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cima, M. and La Rocca, E. (eds.) 1998. Horti Romani: Atti del Convegno Internazionale: Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.
Claassen, Jo-Marie. 1996. ‘Documents of a crumbling marriage: The case of Cicero and Terentia’, Phoenix 50: 208–32.
Claassen, Jo-Marie. 1999. Displaced Persons: The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Cloud, J. D. 1971. ‘Parricidium from the lex Numae to the lex Pompeia de parricidiis’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistiche Abteilung 88: 166.
Cohen, S. T. 2008. ‘Augustus, Julia and the development of exile ad insulam’, Classical Quarterly 58: 206–17.
Cole, S. 2006. ‘Elite scepticism in the Apocolocyntosis: Further qualifications’, in Volk and Williams (2006: 175–82).
Coleman, R. 1974. ‘The artful moralist: A study of Seneca’s epistolary style’, Classical Quarterly 24: 276–89.
Cooper, J. M. and Procopé, J. F. 1995. Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbier, M. 1991. ‘Du nouveau sur l’avvncvlvs de Sénèque?’, in Fick-Michel, N. and Carrière, Jean-Claude (eds.). Mélanges: Etienne Bernand. University of Besançon; Paris: Diffusion Les Belles Lettres, 165–91.
Corbier, M. 2001. ‘Child-exposure and abandonment’, in Dixon, Suzanne (ed.). Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World. London: Routledge, 5273.
Costa, C. D. N. (ed.) 1988. Seneca: 17 Letters. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.
Currie, S. 1998. ‘Poisonous women and unnatural history in Roman culture’, in Wyke, M. (ed.). Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press, 147–67.
Damon, C. and Takács, S. (eds.) 1999. ‘The Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre: Text, Translation, Discussion’, American Journal of Philology 120 (special issue): 1186.
Dasen, V. 2010. ‘Wax and plaster memories: Children in elite and non-elite strategies’, in Dasen and Späth (2010: 109–45).
Dasen, V. and Späth, T. (eds.) 2010. Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Davies, M. 2014. ‘Living with Seneca through his epistles’, Greece & Rome 61: 6890.
Davis, J. 1980. ‘Exempla and anti-exempla in the Amores of Ovid’, Latomus 39: 412–17.
De Bruyn, T. 1999. ‘Flogging a son: The emergence of the “pater flagellans” in Latin Christian discourse’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 7.2: 249–90.
De Pretis, A. 2003. ‘“Insincerity”, “facts”, and “epistolarity”: Approaches to Pliny’s epistles to Calpurnia’, Arethusa 36: 127–46.
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. 1981. ‘In angulo defixus: Seneca e l’emarginazione dell’esilio’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 53: 225–32.
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, Rita. 1990. Tra Ovidio e Seneca. Bologna: Pàtron.
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, Rita. 1999. ‘L’interitus mundi nella Consolatio ad Polybium di Seneca e i “condizionamenti” del destinario’, in Tra Filosofia e Poesia: Studi su Seneca e Dintorni: Testi e manuali per l’insegnamento universitario del latino LVII. Bologna: Pàtron, 1122.
Delarue, F. 2001. ‘Le Dossier du De matrimonio de Sénèque’, Revue des Études Latines 79: 163–87.
Deming, W. 1995. Paul on Marriage and Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7. Society for New Testament Studies, Monograph Series, LXXXIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Di Garbo, F. 2008. ‘La relazione pater/filius come paradigma di autorità: Alcune considerazioni su un sistema di rappresentazione e sulle sue implicazioni funzionali’, in Picone (2008: 259–79).
Dixon, S. 1988. The Roman Mother. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press; London: Routledge.
Dixon, S. 1992. The Roman Family. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dixon, S. 1993. ‘The meaning of gift and debt in the Roman elite’, Échos du Monde Classique/ Classical Views: 451–64.
Donini, P. 1999. ‘Stoic ethics’, in Algra et al. (1999: 675–738).
Duff, J. D. 1915. L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum Libri x., xi., xii.: Three Dialogues of Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edmunds, L. 2009. ‘Horace’s Priapus: A life on the Esquiline (Sat. 1.8)’, Classical Quarterly 59: 125–31.
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, C. 1997. ‘Self-scrutiny and self-transformation in Seneca’s letters’, Greece and Rome 44: 2338.
Edwards, C. 2009. ‘Free yourself! Slavery, freedom and the self in Seneca’s letters’, in Bartsch and Wray (2009: 139–59).
Engberg-Pedersen, T. 1986. ‘Discovering the good: Oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic ethics’, in Schofield and Striker (1986: 145–83).
Engberg-Pedersen, T. 1990. The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis: Moral Development and Social Interaction in Early Stoic Philosophy. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Engel, D. M. 2003. ‘Women’s role in the home and the state: Stoic theory reconsidered’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101: 267–88.
Evans Grubbs, J. 2002. Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. London and New York: Routledge.
Eyben, E. 1991. ‘Fathers and sons’, in Rawson (1991: 114–43).
Fantham, E. 1991. ‘Stuprum: Public attitudes and penalties for sexual offences in Republican Rome’, Échos du Monde Classique/Classical Views 35: 267–91.
Fantham, E. 2006. Julia Augusti. London and New York: Routledge.
Fantham, E. 2007. ‘Dialogues of displacement: Seneca’s consolations to Helvia and Polybius’, in Gaertner (2007: 173–92).
Favro, D. 1992. ‘Pater urbis: Augustus as city father of Rome’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 51: 6184.
Farney, G. D. 2007. Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fear, T. 2007. ‘Of aristocrats and courtesans: Seneca, De Beneficiis 1.14’, Hermes 135: 460–68.
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feeney, Denis C. 2010. ‘Fathers and sons: The Manlii Torquati and family continuity in Catullus and Horace’, in Shuttleworth Kraus, C., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.). Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205–23.
Ferrill, A. 1966. ‘Seneca’s exile and the Ad Helviam: A reinterpretation’, Classical Philology 61: 253–57.
Ferrill, A. 1980. ‘Augustus and his daughter: A modern myth’, in Deroux, C. (ed.). Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History. Brussels: Latomus, 332–46.
Fitch, J. G. (ed.) 2008. Seneca: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace & Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Forbis, E. 1996. Municipal Virtues in the Roman Empire: The Evidence of Italian Honorary Inscriptions. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Foucault, M. 1986. The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Vol. iii. Trans. Hurley, R.. New York: Vintage Books.
Freeland, C. A. 2000. ‘Feminism and ideology in ancient philosophy’, Apeiron 33: 365406.
Gaertner, J. F. (ed.) 2007. Writing Exile: The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
Gardner, J. F. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gardner, J. F. 1998. Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Geffcken, K. A. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Leiden: Brill.
George, M. (ed.) 2005. The Roman Family in the Empire: Rome, Italy, and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, R. K. and Morrison, A. D. 2007. ‘Introduction: What is a letter?’, in Morello and Morrison (2007: 1–16).
Gibson, R. 2012. ‘On the nature of ancient letter collections’, Journal of Roman Studies 102: 56–78.
Gildenhard, I. 2007. Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge Philological Society.
Gill, C. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gill, C. 2013. ‘Stoic erôs: Is there such a thing?’, in Sanders, E., Thumiger, C., Carey, C. and Lowe, N. J. (eds.). Erôs in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginsburg, J. 2006. Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Gloyn, L. 2014a: ‘Show me the way to go home: A reconsideration of Seneca’s De Consolatione ad Polybium’, American Journal of Philology 135: 451–80.
Gloyn, L. 2014b: ‘My family tree goes back to the Romans: Seneca’s approach to the family in the Epistulae Morales’, in Wildberger, J. and Colish, M. L. (eds.). Seneca Philosophus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 229–68.
Gowers, E. 2011. ‘The road to Sicily: Lucilius to Seneca’, Ramus 40: 168–97.
Gowing, A. M. 2005. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gradel, I. 2002. Emperor Worship and Roman Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Graver, M. R. 1996. ‘Therapeutic Reading and Seneca’s Moral Epistles’. PhD thesis, Brown University.
Graver, M. R. 1998. ‘The manhandling of Maecenas: Senecan abstractions of masculinity’, American Journal of Philology 119: 607–32.
Graver, M. R. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Green, S. J. 2004. Ovid, Fasti I: A Commentary. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Griffin, M. T. 1962. ‘De Brevitate Vitae’, Journal of Roman Studies 52: 104–13.
Griffin, M. T. 1972. ‘The elder Seneca and Spain’, Journal of Roman Studies 62: 119.
Griffin, M. T. 1992. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics, 2nd edn, enlarged. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Griffin, M. T. 2013. Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, M. T. and Inwood, B. 2011. Lucius Annaeus Seneca: On Benefits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Griffith, M. 1998. ‘The king and eye: The rule of the father in Greek tragedy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 44: 2084.
Grimal, P. 1978. Seneca: Macht und Ohnmacht des Geistes. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Gunderson, E. 2003. Declamation, Paternity and Roman Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habinek, T. N. 1992. ‘An aristocracy of virtue: Seneca on the beginnings of wisdom’, in Dunn, F. M. and Cole, T. (eds.). Yale Classical Studies XXIX, Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187203.
Hachmann, E. 2006. L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistulae morales, Brief 66: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Hadot, I. 1969. Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Griffin, M. T. 2007. ‘Versuch einer doktrinalen Neueinordnung der Schule der Sextier’, Rheinisches Museum 150: 179210.
Hallett, J. P. 1977. ‘Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus’, American Journal of Ancient History 2: 151–71.
Hallett, Judith P. 1984. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hallett, Judith P. 2006. ‘Fulvia, mother of Iullus Antonius: New approaches to the sources on Julia’s adultery at Rome’, Helios 33: 149–64.
Harders, A.-C. 2010. ‘Roman patchwork families: Surrogate parenting, socialization, and the shaping of tradition’, in Dasen and Späth (2010: 49–72).
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. 2012. ‘Wissensinszenierung bei emotionaler Nähe: Senecas ad Helviam de consolation’, in Fuhrer, T. and Renger, A.-B. (eds.). Performanz von Wissen: Strategien der Wissensvermittlung in der Vormoderne. Heidelberg: Winter, 95108.
Harlow, M. 1998. ‘In the name of the father: Procreation, paternity and patriarchy’, in Foxhall, L. and Salmon, J. (eds.). Thinking Men: Masculinity and its Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition. London: Routledge, 155–69.
Harries, J. 2007. Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, W. V. 1994. ‘Child exposure in the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 84: 122.
Hemelrijk, E. A. 2010. ‘Fictive kinship as a metaphor for women’s civic roles’, Hermes 138: 455–69.
Henderson, J. 2004. Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henderson, J. 2006. ‘Journey of a lifetime: Seneca, Epistle 57 in book vi in EM’, in Volk and Williams (2006: 123–46).
Henry, D. and Henry, E. 1985. The Mask of Power: Seneca’s Tragedies and Imperial Rome. Chicago, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci; Warminster: Aris and Phillips.
Henry, D. and Walker, B. 1983. ‘The Oedipus of Seneca: An imperial tragedy’, in Boyle (1983: 128–39).
Hense, O. 1905. C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.
Hill, L. 2001. ‘The first wave of feminism: Were the Stoics feminists?’, History of Political Thought 22: 1340.
Hine, H. M. 2004. ‘Interpretatio Stoica of Senecan tragedy’, in Billerbeck, M. and Schmidt, E. (eds.). Sénèque le Tragique: Huit Exposés Suivis de Discussions. Vandœuvres, Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 173220.
Hunter, D. G. 2007. Marriage, Celibacy, and Heresy in Ancient Christianity: The Jovinianist Controversy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, G. O. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Imber, M. 2008. ‘Life without father: Declamation and the construction of paternity in the Roman Empire’, in Bell, S., and Hansen, I. L. (eds.). Role Models in the Roman World: Identity and Assimilation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 161–69.
Inwood, B. 1983. ‘Comments on Professor Görgemanns’ paper: The two forms of oikeiosis in Arius and the Stoa’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.). On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 190201.
Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Inwood, B. 1995. ‘Politics and paradox in Seneca’s De Beneficiis’, in Laks and Schofield (1995: 241–65).
Inwood, B. 1999. ‘Stoic ethics’, in Algra et al. (1999: 675–705).
Inwood, B. (ed.) 2003. The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inwood, B. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Inwood, B. (ed.) 2007a. Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Inwood, B. 2007b. ‘The importance of form in Seneca’s philosophical letters’, in Morello and Morrison (2007: 133–48).
Irwin, T. 1998. ‘Stoic inhumanity’, in Sihvola and Engberg-Pedersen (1998: 219–41).
Jackson-McCabe, M. A. 2004. ‘The Stoic theory of implanted preconceptions’, Phronesis 49: 323–47.
James, S. 2013. ‘Gender and sexuality in Terence’, in Augoustakis and Traill (2013: 175–94).
Kamp, H. W. 1937. ‘Seneca’s marriage’, Classical Journal 32: 529–33.
Kassel, R. 1958. Untersuchungen zur Griechischen und Römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich: Beck.
Keen, R. 1985. ‘Lucretius and his reader’, Apeiron 19: 110.
Ker, J. 2006. ‘Seneca, man of many genres’, in Volk and Williams (2006: 19–41).
Ker, J. 2009. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerferd, G. B. 1972. ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 55: 177–96.
Kidd, I. G. 1978. ‘Moral actions and rules in Stoic ethics’, in Rist, J. (ed.). The Stoics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 247–58.
Kidd, I. G. 1988. Posidonius: ii. The Commentary: 2. Fragments 150–293. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleiner, D. E. E. 1978. ‘The great friezes of the Ara Pacis Augustae: Greek sources, Roman derivatives and Augustan social policy’, Mélanges de l’ École Française de Rome. Antiquité 90: 753–85.
Komter, A. and Vollebergh, W. 1997. ‘Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends’, Journal of Marriage and Family 59: 747–57.
Kurth, T. 1994. Senecas Trostschrift an Polybius: Dialog 11: Ein Kommentar. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.). 1995. Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langlands, R. 2006. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lapidge, M. 1989. ‘Stoic cosmology and Roman literature, first to third centuries ad’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 36.3: 1379–429.
Lassen, E. M. 1992. ‘The ultimate crime: Parricidium and the concept of family in the late Roman Republic and early Empire’, Classica et Mediaevalia 43: 147–61.
Lavery, G. B. 1987. ‘Sons and rulers: Paradox in Seneca’s De ira’, L’Antiquité Classique 56: 279–83.
Leach, E. W. 1997–8. ‘Venus, Thetis and the social construction of maternal behavior’, Classical Journal 92: 347–71.
Lelis, A., Percy, W. A. and Verstraete, B. C. 2003. The Age of Marriage in Ancient Rome. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.
LeMoine, F. J. 1991. ‘Parental gifts: Father-son dedications and dialogues in Roman didactic literature’, Illinois Classical Studies 16: 337–66.
Lentano, M. (ed.) 1997. Contro il matrimonio, ovvero, Perché all’uomo saggio non convenga prender moglie: Lucio Annaeo Seneca. Bari: Palomar.
Levick, B. 1975. ‘“Julians and Claudians”’, Greece & Rome 22: 2938.
Long, A. A. (ed.) 1971a. Problems in Stoicism. London: University of London, Athlone Press.
Long, A. A. 1971b. ‘Freedom and determinism in the Stoic theory of human action’, in Long (1971a: 173–199).
Long, A. A. 1995. Stoic Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, A. A. 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lutz, C. 1947. ‘Musonius Rufus: The Roman Socrates’, Yale Classical Studies 10: 1147.
McGinn, T. 1998. Prostitution, Sexuality, and the Law in Ancient Rome. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
McLynn, N. 2010. ‘The manna from uncle: Basil of Caesarea’s address to young men’, in Kelly, C., Flower, R., Williams, M. S. and Williams, M. (eds.). Unclassical Traditions, Vol. i : Alternatives to the Classical Past in Late Antiquity. Cambridge Philological Society, 106–18.
McMaster, A. 2010. ‘The rules of gift-exchange: Catullus 12, 13 & 14’, Mouseion 10: 355–79.
Manning, C. E. 1973. ‘Seneca and the Stoics on the equality of the sexes’, Mnemosyne 26: 170–77.
Manning, C. E. 1974. ‘The consolatory tradition and Seneca’s attitude to the emotions’, Greece & Rome 21: 7181.
Manning, C. E. 1976. ‘Seneca’s 98th Letter and the praemeditatio mali’, Mnemosyne 29: 301–4.
Manning, C. E. 1981. On Seneca’s Ad Marciam. Leiden: Brill.
Manning, C. E. 1987. ‘The Sextii’, Prudentia 19: 1627.
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maslakov, G. 1984. ‘Valerius Maximus and Roman historiography: A study of the exempla tradition’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 32.1: 437–96.
Mauch, M. 1997. Senecas Frauenbild in den philosophischen Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Maurach, G. 1970. Der Bau von Senecas Epistulae morales. Heidelberg: Winter.
Mayer, R. G. 2008. ‘Roman historical exempla in Seneca’, in Fitch (2008: 299–315).
Mazzoli, G. 1989. ‘Le Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium di Seneca: Valore letterario e filosofico’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 36.3: 1823–877.
Milnor, K. L. 2005. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moller, D. 2005. ‘The marriage commitment: Reply to Landau’, Philosophy 80: 279–84.
Momigliano, A. 1963. ‘An interim report on the origins of Rome’, Journal of Roman Studies 53: 95121.
Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.) 2007. Ancient Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Most, G. W. 1998. ‘À la recherche du texte perdu: On collecting philosophical fragments’, in Burkert, W., Gemelli Marciano, L., Matelli, E. and Orelli, L (eds.). Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer texter der Antike/Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi (Aporemata 3). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 115.
Mouritsen, H. 2011. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mulroy, D. 1988. ‘The early career of P. Clodius Pulcher: A re-examination of the charges of mutiny and sacrilege’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 155–78.
Murnaghan, S. 1988. ‘How a woman can be more like a man: The dialogue between Isomachus and his wife in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus’, Helios 15: 922.
Nails, D. 2002. The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Neuhausen, K. A. 1984. ‘Hieronymus, Seneca und Theophrasts Schrift über die Freundschaft’, in Dassman, E. and Thraede, K. (eds.). Vivarium: Festschrift Theodor Klauser zum 90. Geburtstag. Munich: Aschendorff, 257–86.
Nugent, S. G. 1994. ‘Mater matters: The female in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, Colby Quarterly 30: 179205.
Nussbaum, M. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 1995. ‘Eros and the wise: The Stoic response to a cultural dilemma’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13: 231–67.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. ‘Duties of justice, duties of material aid: Cicero’s problematic legacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 176206.
Nussbaum, M. 2002a. ‘The incomplete feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman’, in Nussbaum and Sihvola (2002: 283–326).
Nussbaum, M. 2002b. ‘The worth of human dignity: Two tensions in Stoic cosmopolitanism’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.). Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3149.
Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds.) 2002. The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
O’Hara, S. F. 1993. ‘Patria potestas: A brief re-examination’, in Hillard, T. W., Kearsley, R. A., Nixon, C. E. V. and Nobbs, A. M. (eds.). Ancient History in a Modern University: Proceedings of a Conference Held at Macquarie University, 8–13 July, 1993, Vol. i. Michigan: Eerdmans, 210–16.
Oppel, J. 1993. ‘Saint Jerome and the history of sex’, Viator 24: 122.
Packman, Z. M. 2013. ‘Family and household in the comedies of Terence’, in Augoustakis and Traill (2013: 195–210).
Pagán, V. E. 2006. Rome and the Literature of Gardens. London: Duckworth.
Pembroke, S. G. 1971. ‘Oikeiōsis’, in Long (1971a: 114–49).
Penner, T. 1973. ‘The unity of virtue’, The Philosophical Review 82: 3568.
Picone, G. (ed.). 2008. Clementia Caesaris: Modelli etici, parenesi e retorica dell’esilio. Palermo: Palumbo.
Pigoń, J. 2001. ‘Sejanus and the death of Drusus: One rumour or two? (Tacitus, Annals iv 10)’, in Kotula, T. and Ladomirski, A. (eds.). Le Monde romain et ses periphéries sous la République et sous l’Empire. Wrocław: Wrocław University Press), 147–52.
Plessis, P. du. 2010. Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramelli, I. (ed.) 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. Trans. Konstan, David. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
Ramsby, T. R. and Severy, B. 2007. ‘Gender, sex, and the domestication of the Empire in art of the Augustan age’, Arethusa 40: 4371.
Rawson, B. 1986. ‘The Roman family’, in Rawson, B. (ed.). The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 157.
Rawson, B. (ed.) 1991. Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Canberra: Humanities Research Centre; Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rawson, B. 2003. Children and Childhood in Roman Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawson, B. (ed.) 2011. A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rawson, B. and Weaver, P. R. (eds.) 1997. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. Canberra: Humanities Research Centre; Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
Reydams-Schils, G. 2002. ‘Human bonding and oikeiosis in Roman Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 221–51.
Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Reynolds, L.D. 1965. L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reynolds, L.D. 1977. L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum Libri Duodecim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richardson-Hay, C. 2006. First Lessons: Book 1 of Seneca’s Epistulae Morales. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Richlin, A. 1981. ‘Approaches to the sources on adultery at Rome’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.). Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: Gordon and Breach, 379404.
Riggsby, A. M. 2003. ‘Pliny in space (and time)’, Arethusa 36: 167–86.
Rimell, V. 2013. ‘The best a man can get: Grooming Scipio in Seneca Epistle 86’, Classical Philology 108: 120.
Rist, J. M. 1969. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, R. S. 1965. ‘The case of Cremutius Cordus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96: 351–59.
Roller, M. B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roller, M. B. 2004. ‘Exemplarity in Roman culture: The cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, Classical Philology 99: 156.
Rose, C. B. 1990. ‘“Princes” and barbarians on the Ara Pacis’, American Journal of Archaeology 94: 453–67.
Rose, C. B. 1997. Dynastic Commemoration and Imperial Portraiture in the Julio-Claudian Period. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenmeyer, T. G. 1989. Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rosenmeyer, T. G. 2000. ‘Seneca and nature’, Arethusa 33: 99119.
Rosenmeyer, T. G. 1987. ‘Seneca’s palinode. Consolatio ad Polybium and Apokolokyntosis’, The Ancient World 15: 105–9.
Rudich, V. 1987. ‘Seneca’s palinode: Consolatio ad Polybium and Apokolokyntosis’, The Ancient World 15: 105–9.
Rudich, V. 1997. Dissidence and Literature under Nero: The Price of Rhetoricization. New York: Routledge.
Russell, D. A. 1974. ‘Letters to Lucilius’, in Costa, C. D. N. (ed.). Seneca. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 7095.
Saller, R. P. 1984. ‘Familia, domus, and the Roman conception of the family’, Phoenix 38: 336–55.
Saller, R. P. 1987. ‘Men’s age at marriage and its consequences in the Roman family’, Classical Philology 82: 2035.
Saller, R. P. 1988. ‘Pietas, obligation and authority in the Roman family’, in Kneissl, P. and Losemann, V. (eds.). Alte Geschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 65. Geburtstag. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 393410.
Saller, R. P. 1991. ‘Corporal punishment, authority and obedience in the Roman household’, in Rawson (1991: 144–65).
Saller, R. P. 1999. ‘Pater familias, mater familias, and the gendered semantics of the Roman household’, Classical Philology 94: 182–97.
Saller, R. P. 2000. ‘Status and patronage’, in The Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. xi, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 817–54.
Salles, R. 2005. ‘Ἐκπύρωσις and the goodness of God in Cleanthes’, Phronesis 50: 5678.
Sampino, F. 2008. ‘Beneficium, società e potere: Una lettura del de beneficiis di Seneca’, in Picone (2008: 281–300).
Schafer, J. 2009. Ars Didactica: Seneca’s 94th and 95th Letters. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Schafer, J. 2011. ‘Seneca’s Epistulae morales as dramatized education’, Classical Philology 106: 3252.
Schofield, M. 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schofield, M. 1995. ‘Two Stoic approaches to justice’, in Laks and Schofield (1995: 191–212).
Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) 1986. The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Schönegg, B. 1999. Senecas Epistulae morales als philosophisches Kunstwerk. Berne and Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Sedley, D. 1999. ‘The Stoic-Platonist debate on kathēkonta’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.). Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–52.
Sedley, D. 2003. ‘The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in Inwood (2003: 7–32).
Sellars, J. 2007. ‘Stoic cosmopolitanism and Zeno’s Republic’, History of Political Thought 28: 129.
Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York: Routledge.
Shaw, B. 2001. ‘Raising and killing children: Two Roman myths’, Mnemosyne 54: 3277.
Shelton, J. 1995. ‘Persuasion and paradigm in Seneca’s Consolatio ad Marciam 1–6’, Classica et Mediaevalia 46: 157–88.
Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.) 1998. The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.
Skard, E. 1932. Zwei Religiös-Politische Begriffe Euergetes-Concordia. Oslo: Dybwad.
Skidmore, C. 1996. Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: The Work of Valerius Maximus. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Spaeth, B. 1996. The Roman Goddess Ceres. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Stackelberg, K. T. von. 2009. The Roman Garden: Space, Sense, and Society. London and New York: Routledge.
Stafford, E. J. 2005. ‘Viewing and obscuring the female breast: Glimpses of the ancient bra’, in Cleland, L., Harlow, M. and Llewellyn-Jones, L. (eds.). The Clothed Body in the Ancient World. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 96110.
Star, C. 2006. ‘Commanding constantia in Senecan tragedy’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 136: 207–44.
Star, Christopher. 2012. The Empire of the Self: Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stephens, W. O. 1996. ‘Epictetus on how the Stoic sage loves’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14: 193210.
Stevenson, T. R. 1992. ‘The ideal benefactor and the father analogy in Greek and Roman thought’, Classical Quarterly 42: 421–36.
Stevenson, T. R. 2000. ‘Parens patriae and Livy’s Camillus’, Ramus 29: 2746.
Stewart, Z. 1953. ‘Sejanus, Gaetulicus and Seneca’, American Journal of Philology 74: 7085.
Stowell, M. C. 1999. ‘Stoic Therapy of Grief: A Prolegomenon to Seneca’s Ad Marciam, de consolatione’. PhD thesis, Cornell University.
Sweeney, J. M. 1978. ‘The career of Cn. Domitius Calvinus’, The Ancient World 1: 179–85.
Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Syme, R. 1986. The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
Tanner, R. G. 1985. ‘Stoic philosophy and Roman tradition in Senecan tragedy’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 32.2: 1100–33.
Temkin, O. 1991. Soranus’ Gynecology. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Thom, J. C. 2005. Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Thomas, Y. 1983. ‘Paura dei padri e violenza dei figli: Immagini retoriche e norme di diritto’, in Pellizer, E. and Zorzetti, N. (eds.). La paura dei padri nella società antica e medievale. Rome: Laterza, 113140.
Too, Y. L. 1994. ‘Educating Nero: A reading of Seneca’s Epistles’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.). Reflections of Nero: Culture, History and Representation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 211–24.
Torre, C. 1995a. ‘La concezione senecana del sapiens: Le metamorfosi animali’, Maia 47: 349–69.
Torre, C. 1995b. ‘Il cavallo immagine del sapiens in Seneca’, Maia 47: 371–78.
Torre, C. 2000. Il Matrimonio del Sapiens: Ricerche sul de Matrimonio di Seneca. University of Genoa.
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Treggiari, S. 2007. Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. Oxford: Routledge.
Trillitzsch, W. 1965. ‘Hieronymus und Seneca’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 2: 4254.
Trinacty, C. V. 2009. ‘Like father like son: Selected examples of intertextuality in Seneca the Elder and Younger’, Phoenix 63: 260–77.
Turpin, W. 2008. ‘Tacitus, Stoic exempla, and the praecipuum munus annalium’, Classical Antiquity 27: 359404.
Uzzi, J. D. 2007. ‘The power of parenthood in official Roman art’, Hesperia Supplements 41: Constructions of Childhood in Ancient Greece and Italy 6181.
Vesley, M. E. 2003. ‘Father–son relations in Roman declamation’, The Ancient History Bulletin 17: 158–80.
Veyne, P. 1987. ‘The Roman Empire’, in Veyne, P. (ed.). A History of Private Life, Vol. i: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Vico, C. De. 1969. ‘Considerazioni sulla Consolatio ad Marciam di Seneca’, Giornale Italiano di Filologia 21: 137–45.
Vogt, K. M. 2006. ‘Anger, present injustice and future revenge in Seneca’s De Ira’, in Volk and Williams (2006: 57–74).
Vogt, K. M. 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Volk, K. 2002. The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.) 2006. Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Leiden: Brill.
Vottero, D. 1998. Lucio Anneo Seneca: I Frammenti. Bologna: Patron.
Wagoner, R. 2014. ‘Seneca on moral theory and moral improvement’, Classical Philology 109: 241–62.
Wardle, D. 1997. ‘“The Sainted Julius”: Valerius Maximus and the dictator’, Classical Philology 92: 323–45.
Wardle, D. 2000. ‘Valerius Maximus on the Domus Augusta, Augustus, and Tiberius’, Classical Quarterly 50: 479–93.
Watson, P. A. 1995. Ancient Stepmothers: Myth, Misogyny, and Reality. Leiden and New York: Brill.
Watson, P. A. and Watson, L. C. 2009. ‘Seneca and Felicio: Imagery and purpose’, Classical Quarterly 59: 212–25.
Weaver, P. R. C. W. 1972. Familia Caesaris: A Social Study of the Emperor’s Freedmen and Slaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welch, K. 1995. ‘Antony, Fulvia, and the ghost of Clodius in 47 bc’, Greece & Rome 42: 182201.
Welch, Kathryn. 2012. Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
Wiesen, D. S. 1964. St. Jerome as a Satirist: A Study in Christian Latin Thought and Letters. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wilcox, A. 2005. ‘Paternal grief and the public eye: Cicero Ad Familiares 4.6’, Phoenix 59: 267–87.
Wilcox, Amanda. 2006. ‘Exemplary grief: Gender and virtue in Seneca’s consolations to women’, Helios 33: 73100.
Wilcox, Amanda. 2008. ‘Nature’s monster: Caligula as exemplum in Seneca’s dialogues’, in Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I. (eds.). Kakos: Badness and Anti-Value in Classical Antiquity. Boston and Leiden: Brill, 451–75.
Wilcox, Amanda. 2012. The Gift of Correspondence in Classical Rome: Friendship in Cicero’s Ad Familiares and Seneca’s Moral Epistles. University of Wisconsin Press.
Wildberger, J. 2006. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt, 2 vols. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
Williams, G. (ed.) 2003. De Otio; De Brevitate Vitae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, G. 2006. ‘States of exile, states of mind: paradox and reversal in Seneca’s Consolatio Ad Helviam Matrem’, in Volk and Williams (2006: 147–73).
Wilson, M. 1997. ‘The subjugation of grief in Seneca’s Epistles’, in Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.). The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4867.
Wilson, Marcus. 2001. ‘Seneca’s Epistles reclassified’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.). Texts, Ideas and the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164–87.
Wiseman, T. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, S. 1995. ‘Diva Drusilla Panthea and the sisters of Caligula’, American Journal of Archaeology 99: 457–82.
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Trans. Shapiro, A.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed