Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- 13 Cracking the Code: Wedgies and Lexical Respectability
- 14 Language Regard and Cultural Practice: Variation, Evaluation, and Change in the German Regional Languages
- 15 Tabula Rasa New-Dialect Formation: On the Occasional Irrelevance of Language Regard
- 16 Sharedness and Variability in Language Regard among Young Danes: Focus on Gender
- Index
- References
16 - Sharedness and Variability in Language Regard among Young Danes: Focus on Gender
from Part III - Language Regard and Language Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- 13 Cracking the Code: Wedgies and Lexical Respectability
- 14 Language Regard and Cultural Practice: Variation, Evaluation, and Change in the German Regional Languages
- 15 Tabula Rasa New-Dialect Formation: On the Occasional Irrelevance of Language Regard
- 16 Sharedness and Variability in Language Regard among Young Danes: Focus on Gender
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language RegardMethods, Variation and Change, pp. 282 - 299Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, Jennifer & Pichler, Pia (eds.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 2nd edn., 57–66. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 1991. Sproglige normidealer på Næstvedegnen. Kvantitative sprogholdningsstudier. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 167–192.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Attitudes, ideology and awareness. In Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 265–278. Washington, DC: SAGE.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie, Jensen, Torben Juel, Kristiansen, Tore, & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2013. Diffusion of language change: Accommodation to a moving target. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(1). 3–36.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia (special issue) II. 9–33.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Does language regard vary? In Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes, 1–36. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. & Niedzielski, Nancy. 2013. Approaches to the study of language regard. In Kristiansen, Tore & Grondelaers, Stefan (eds.), Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, 287–307. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1979. Sex markers in speech. In Scherer, Klaus R. & Giles, Howard (eds.), Social Markers in Speech, 109–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.). 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thøgersen, Jacob & Pharao, Nicolai. 2013. Changing pronunciation but stable social evaluation? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2). Selected Papers from NWAV 41. Article 41. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol19/iss2/21Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar