Tables
1.1Michigan ratings of the North and the South for twelve attributes (scale = 1 to 6)
1.2Formants of tokens of last played for respondents (N=42) and responses
1.3Errors and error types in the single-word comprehension test given to Northern Cities Shift speakers when the vowels presented are Northern Cities Shift shifted
1.4Google data for site + drawl/twang collocations, retrieved February 2, 2011
2.1Texas respondents by year of birth and self-reported ethnicity
2.2South Korean respondents by year of birth and self-reported urbanicity
3.1Rankings of the regions, based on mean scores for each characteristic, as rated by all participants
4.2Correctness ratings for all sentences: high versus low SLR
5.1The seventeen respondents who participated in the mental map drawing task, according to birth location, the dialect they speak, age, and sex
7.1Model results for Western bait: bet continuum in four conditions
7.2Model results for Western date: debt continuum in four conditions
7.3Model results for Southern bait: bet continuum in four conditions
7.4Model results for Southern date: debt continuum in four conditions
8.4Correctness scores when residence was indicated (1= less correct, 7 = more correct)
8.5Comparison of correctness scores (1= less correct, 7 = more correct)
9.3Teachers’ identities at signers’ former schools by age group
9.4Signers’ comments about teachers’ signing skills by age group
9.5Location: comparison of results for Southern Black ASL, Louisiana Black ASL, and White ASL: age by lowering (% –cf)
9.6One-handed vs. two-handed signs: comparison of results for Southern Black ASL, Louisiana Black ASL, Non-Southern Black ASL, and White ASL: (% one-handed)
12.1National and social stratification of the speech stimuli
12.2Native and non-native rankings for job suitability (1= highest suitability, 10= lowest suitability)
13.1Four major variables and four minor ones, with variants, for the name of a schoolyard prank in the Golden Horseshoe, Canada, 1990
16.1Means of Label Ranking Task (LRT) results in the five LANCHART communities: consciously offered evaluations of dialect names in terms of preference
16.2Varieties: patterns of evaluation and involvement in social meaning-making
