Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    van Heusden, Elle Harris, Anthony M. Garrido, Marta I. and Hogendoorn, Hinze 2019. Predictive coding of visual motion in both monocular and binocular human visual processing. Journal of Vision, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Schneider, Keith A. 2018. The Flash-Lag, Fröhlich and Related Motion Illusions Are Natural Consequences of Discrete Sampling in the Visual System. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Hubbard, Timothy L. and Ruppel, Susan E. 2013. Displacement of location in illusory line motion. Psychological Research, Vol. 77, Issue. 3, p. 260.

    Müsseler, Jochen and Tiggelbeck, Jens 2013. The perceived onset position of a moving target: Effects of trial contexts are evoked by different attentional allocations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 75, Issue. 2, p. 349.

    Weiß, Katharina Hilkenmeier, Frederic Scharlau, Ingrid and Akyürek, Elkan 2013. Attention and the Speed of Information Processing: Posterior Entry for Unattended Stimuli Instead of Prior Entry for Attended Stimuli. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. e54257.

    Priess, Heinz-Werner Scharlau, Ingrid Becker, Stefanie I. and Ansorge, Ulrich 2012. Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 365.

    Hubbard, Timothy L. and Ruppel, Susan E. 2011. Effects of spatial cuing on the onset repulsion effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 73, Issue. 7, p. 2236.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: October 2010

19 - The Fröhlich effect: past and present

from Part IV - Spatial phenomena: forward shift effects
Summary

Summary

When observers are asked to localize the initial position of a moving target, they often indicate a position displaced in the direction of motion relative to the true onset position. In this review, the debate between Fröhlich, who discovered this phenomenon, and his contemporaries in the 1920s and 1930s is summarized. Striking misinterpretations of Fröhlich's findings and the anticipation of recent research on the flash-lag effect will be presented. In the second part, current accounts of the Fröhlich effect in terms of attention and metacontrast are evaluated. In the final section, reconciliation between research on the Fröhlich effect and recent reports of an error opposite the direction of motion (the onset repulsion effect) is offered.

Introduction

When asked to localize a moving target entering a window, observers often indicate a position not adjacent to the edge of the window but a position displaced in the direction of motion (see Fig. 19.1(a)). The gap between the edge of a window and the initial perception of the moving target was first discovered by the Norwegian astronomer O. Pihl in 1894, but Fröhlich (1923) was the first to study the effect systematically. Therefore, the illusion has been named the “Fröhlich effect.” Fröhlich's explanation of the illusion in terms of “sensation time” was amply discussed in the 1930s (Fröhlich 1930, 1932; Rubin 1930; G. E. Müller 1931; Metzger 1932; Piéron 1935) but forgotten for the 60 years that followed.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Space and Time in Perception and Action
  • Online ISBN: 9780511750540
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750540
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Actis-Grosso, R., & Stucchi, N. (2003). Shifting the start: backward mislocation of the initial position of a motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(3): 675–691.
Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. J Opt Soc Am 43(8): 648–657.
Baldo, M. V., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378(6557): 565–566.
Breitmeyer, B., & Öğmen, H. (2006). Visual Masking: Time Slices Through Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Burr, D. (1980). Motion smear. Nature 284(5752): 164–165.
Cai, R. (2003). The Fröhlich effect is not due to a failure to perceive the beginning portion of motion trajectory. J Vis 3(9): 485.
Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics 27(3): 183–228.
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 129(4): 481–507.
Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287(5460): 2036–2038.
Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: a critical look at the evidence. Perception & Psychophysics 42(3): 299–305.
Francis, G., & Hermens, F. (2002). Comment on “Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes” (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). J Exp Psychol Gen 131(4): 590–593; discussion 594–596.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58–78.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1930). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. Eine Erwiderung auf experimenteller Grundlage [On the measurement of sensation time. An answer on an experimental basis]. Psychologische Forschung 13: 285–288.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1932). Bemerkungen zu G.E. Müllers Kritik der Empfindungszeitmessung [Remarks on the criticism of G. E. Müller of the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 62: 246–249.
Geer, M., & Schmidt, W. C. (2006). Perception of initial moving target signals: support for a cumulative lateral inhibition theory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32(5): 1185–1196.
Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2002). Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory? Cognition 82(3): B89–99.
Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich Effect or an Onset Repulsion Effect. Q J Exp Psychol 58A(6): 961–979.
Kerzel, D. (2002). Different localization of motion onset with pointing and relative judgements. Exp Brain Res 145(3): 340–350.
Kerzel, D. (2004). Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error. Psychon Bull Rev 11(5): 848–853.
Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2004). Spatial distortions and processing latencies in the onset repulsion and Fröhlich effects. Vision Res 44(6): 577–590.
Kerzel, D., & Müsseler, J. (2002). Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Vision Res 42(2): 181–189.
Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature 378(6557): 566.
Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects “corrected” or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception 29(6): 675–692.
Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Res 39: 3702–3709.
Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2003). Perceived onset time and position of a moving stimulus. Vision Res 43(15): 1625–1635.
MacKay, D. M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181(4607): 507–508.
Metzger, W. (1932). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit [An attempt at a common theory of Fröhlich's and Hazelhoff's phenomena and a critique of their procedure for measuring sensation time]. Psychologische Forschung 16: 176–200.
Müller, G. E. (1931). Erklärung der Erscheinungen eines mit konstanter Geschwindigkeit beewegten Lichtstreifens, insbesondere auch des Pihl-Fröhlichschen Phänomens [Explanation of the appearances of a lit bar moving at constant velocity, in particular the phenomenon of Pihl-Fröhlich]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 62: 167–202.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2): 315–330.
Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics 60(4): 683–695.
Müsseler, J., & Kerzel, D. (2004). The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: reconciling the Fröhlich and Onset Repulsion Effects. Vision Res 44(19): 2201–2206.
Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1992). Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychol Res 54(4): 246–266.
Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli. The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. Vis Cogn 9(1/2): 120–138.
Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370(6487): 256–257.
Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: no evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. Vis Cogn 11(2/3): 275–298.
Piéron, H. (1935). Le processus du métacontraste. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 32: 1–24.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32(1): 3–25.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H., Bouma & D. G., Bouwhuis (eds.), Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 109(2): 160–174.
Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Öğmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396(6710): 424.
Remington, R., & Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 35(4): 393–399.
Rubin, E. (1930). Kritisches und Experimentelles zur “Empfindungszeit” Fröhlichs [Critical and experimental remarks on Fröhlich's “Sensation Time]. Psychologische Forschung 13(101–112).
Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity: not perceived as such. Psychol Res 37(1): 3–23.
Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn Sci 9(1): 16–20.
Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie 134: 365–435.
Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spat Vis 15(2): 219–244.
Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). The position of moving objects. Science 289(5482): 1107a.
Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Vis Cogn 9(1/2): 139–152.
Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1(8): 656–657.