Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:25:39.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Karakhanids and early Islam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Peter B. Golden
Edited by
Denis Sinor
Denis Sinor
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

It has been suggested, with some justice, that a limes system separating steppe from sown, barbarian from cultivated, urban society, spanned Eurasia. This system of fortifications and natural barriers, however, was not impenetrable. When the societies sheltered by these walls were strong, incursions from the nomadic world beyond were repulsed or contained. When their defences proved inadequate, sedentary societies either had to tame the “barbarian” by converting him to their culture or be completely transformed themselves. Western Central Asia, an Eastern Iranian area increasingly coming under the cultural influence of neighboring, kindred Sassanid Iran before the advent of Islam and the recipient of cultural currents emanating from the Mediterranean, India and China, was one of those zones through which the steppe-dweller could enter sedentary society. Conversely, its mercantile urban centers also served as a gateway through which the cultural and material achievements of settled society could penetrate the steppe. In the period under discussion, Western Central Asia, having recently accommodated itself to the political and cultural buffetings administered to it by expanding Arab power, was about to enter into another period of intense and intimate contact with the nomadic, Turkic societies to its north and north-east. In this instance, it would serve as the transmission zone for the cultural fruits of one nomadic society to another. Its role in this process was not passive, for the Islamic culture which entered the steppe zone had been influenced and reworked by the Eastern Iranians.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia , pp. 343 - 370
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ʿAta-Malik, Juvainī, Ta'rīkh-i Jahān Gushā: The History of the World-Conqueror, trans. Boyle, J. A., 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1958).Google Scholar
Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, (“The Regions of the World”), trans. Minorsky, V. F. (Gibb Memorial Series, New Series, XI, London, 1937, 2nd rev. ed. London, 1970).Google Scholar
Abramzon, C. M., Kirgizy i ikh ėtnogenetičeskie i istoriko-kul'turnye svjazi (Leningrad, 1971).Google Scholar
Abu'l, Faḍl Baihaqī, Ta'rīkh-i Baihaqī, ed. Ghanī, Q., Fayyāḍ, ʿA. (Tehran, 1324/1945.Google Scholar
Abu'l, Faḍl Baihaqī, Russ. trans. Arends, K., Abu-l Faz̤l Baihaḳī, Istoriia Masʿūda (1030–1041), 2nd rev. ed. (Pamjatniki Pis'mennosti Vostoka, 22, Moskva, 1969).Google Scholar
Agadžanov, S. G., Očerki istorii oguzov i turkmen Srednej Azii IX–XII vv. (Ashkhabad, 1969).Google Scholar
Aidarov, G., Jazyk orkhonskikh pamjatnikov drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti VIII veka (Alma-Ata, 1971).Google Scholar
Akhinžanov, S. M., “Kipchaki i Khorezm v kanun mongol'skogo našestvija,” Vestnik Akademii Nauk Kazakhskoj SSR (1970), No. I.Google Scholar
Al-Ḥusainī, , Akhbār al-Dawlah al-Saljuqīyah (Lahore, 1933).Google Scholar
Al-Ḥusainī, , Turk, trans. Lügal, N., Ahbar üd-devlet is-Selçuktyye (Türk Tarih Kurumu yaym-lanndan, 2nd series, vol. 8, Ankara, 1943).Google Scholar
Al-Ṭabarī, , Ta'rīkh al-Ṭabarī, ed. Ibrāhīm, Muḥammed Abu'l Faḍl, 10 vols. (Dhakhāʾir al-'Arab, 30, Cairo, 1964–70).Google Scholar
Al-Balādhurī, , Futūḥ al-Buldān, ed. Raḍwān, R. M. (Cairo, 1959).Google Scholar
Al-Bīrūnī, , Athār al-Baqīyah, ed. Sachau, E. (1876, reprint Leipzig, 1923).Google Scholar
Al-Bīrūnī, , Kitāb al-Jamāhir fī Ma'rifat al-Jawāhir, ed. Krenkow, S. (Ḥaidarābād, 1355/1936–7).Google Scholar
Al-Iṣṭakhrī, , Kitāb Masālik al-Mamālik, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, I, Leiden, 1927 2).Google Scholar
Al-Idrīsī, , Kitāb Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Āfāq: Opus Geographicum, ed. Rubinacci, R. et al., fasc. 1–9 (Leiden–Rome–Naples, 1970–84).Google Scholar
Al-‘Utbī, , Ta'rikh al-Yamīnī with commentary of al-Manīnī, Shaykh Aḥmad b. 'Alī (Cairo, 1268/1869).Google Scholar
Al-Marwazī, : Sharāf al-Zamān Tāhir Marvazī on China, the Turks and India, ed. trans. Minorsky, V. F. (London, 1942).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj al-Dhahab wa Maʿādin al-Jawhar (“Meadows of Gold and Mines of Precious Stones”), ed. Pellat, C. (Beirut, 1966–79) 7 vols.Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj adh-Dhahab wa Ma ʿādin al-Jawhar, ed. Pellat, C., 7 vols. (Beirut, 1966–1979).Google Scholar
Al-Muqaddasī, , Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm fī Ma'rifat al-Aqālīm (“The Best of Divisions Regarding Knowledge of the Climes”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, III, Leiden, 1906).Google Scholar
Al-Nadīm, , The Fihrist of al-Nadīm, trans. Dodge, B. (Records of Civilization: Sources and Studies, lxxxiii, 2 vols., New York–London, 1970).Google Scholar
Al-Ya'qūbī, , Kitāb al-Buldān, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 7 Leiden, 1892).Google Scholar
Al-Ya'qūbī, , Ta'rīkh, (Beirut, 1390/1970) 2 vols.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, trans. Minorsky, V. F. (E.J. W. Gibb Memorial New Series, 11, London, 1937, reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Bacot, J., “Reconnaissance en Haute Asie Septentrionale par cinq envoyés Ouigours au VIIIe siècle,” Journal asiatique, 244 (1956).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Balasagun”, Akademik V.V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–1973), vol. III.Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., Dvenadcat′ lekcii po istorii tureckikh narodov Srednej Azii, Sočinenija, V: Germ. vers. (Barthold, W.), Zwölf Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens (1932–5, reprint Hildesheim, 1962).Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E., The Ghaznavids (Edinburgh, 1963).Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E., “The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World (A.D. 1000–1217),” The Cambridge History of Iran ed. Boyle, J. A., vol. 5 (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar
Bretschneider, E., Medieval Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources, 2 vols. (London, 1888, reprint 1967).Google Scholar
Cahen, C., “Le Malik-nameh et l'histoire des origines Seljoucides,” Oriens, 2 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahen, C., Pre-Ottoman Turkey, trans. Jones-Williams, J. (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Chavannes, E., Documents sur les Tou-kiue, (Turcs,) Occidentaux (St. Petersbourg, 1903).Google Scholar
Clauson, G., “À propos du Manuscrit Pelliot Tibétain 1283,” Journal asiatique 245 (1957).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “A karluk törzsek nevei,” Magyar Nyelv 45 (1949).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “Kāšġarī földrajzi neveihez,” Bárczi Géza – Emlékkönyv, ed. Benkö, L. (Budapest, 1963).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “Gardīzī on the History of Central Asia (745–780 a.d.),” Acta Orientalia Hungarica 27.3 (1973).Google Scholar
Davidovic, E.A., “O dvukh karakhanidskikh kaganatakh,” Narody Azii i Afriki, 1968, No. 1.Google Scholar
Davidovič, E. A., “Numizmatičeskie materialy dlja khronologii i genealogii sredneaziatskikh Karakhanidov,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo Muzeja, 26, Numizmatičeskiĭ sbornik, pt. 2 (1957).Google Scholar
Desmaisons, P. I., Histoire des Mogols et des Tatares par Aboul-Ghazi Béhadour Khan (St. Pétersbourg, 1871–4, reprint Amsterdam, 1970).Google Scholar
Eremeev, D. E., Êtnogenez Tjurok (Moskva, 1971).Google Scholar
Esin, E., “Ṭabarīʾs Report on the Warfare with the Türgiš and the Testimony of Eighth Century Central Asian Art,” Central Asiatic Journal 17.2–4 (1973).Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Novye fakty iz istorii Karakhanidov pervoĭ četverti XI v. v svete numizmatičeskikh dannykh,” Iz Istorii Kul'tury Narodov Uzbekistana (Tashkent, 1965).Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Očerk istorii Karakhanidov vtori četverti XI v. (po numizmatičeskim dannym),” Istorija Material' noj Kul'tury Uzbekistana 7 (1966).Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Ferganskiĭ klad karakhanidskikh dirkhemov 1034–1043 gg.,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija (1968), No. 3.Google Scholar
Frye, R. N., The Golden Age of Persia. The Arabs in the East (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Gafurov, B. G., Litvinskiĭ, B. A., Istorija tadžikskogo naroda, 3 vols. (Moskva, 1963–5).Google Scholar
Gafurov, B. G., Tadžiki (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Bartol'd, V. V., “Izvlečenie iz sočinenija Gardizi Zain al-Akhbār” in Bartol'd, V. V., Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Zain al-Akhbār, ed. Nāzim, M. (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar
Gibb, H.A.R., The Arab Conquests in Central Asia (1923, reprint New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Golden, P. B., “The Migrations of the Oǧuz,” Archivum Ottomanicum, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Golden, P. B., “Imperial Ideology and the Sources of Political Unity Amongst the Pre-Činggisid Nomads of Western Eurasia,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 2 (1976).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The Migrations of the Oǧuz,” Archivum Ottomanicum, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Grenard, F., “La légende de Satok Boghra Khan et l'histoire,” Journal asiatique 1900, I.Google Scholar
Guliamov, Ia. G., Tolstov, S. P. et al., Istorija Uzbekskoj SSR, vol. I (Tashkent, 1967).Google Scholar
Gumilëv, L. N., Drevnie Tjurki (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Gumilëv, L. N., Poiski vymyšlennogo carstva, (Moskva, 1970).Google Scholar
Harshakhī, , Ta'rīkh-i Bukhārā: The History of Bukhara, trans. Frye, R. N. (The Medieval Academy of America, Publication No. 61, Cambridge, Mass., 1954).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H., “Die Qarluq in der tibetischen Literatur,” Oriens, 3 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn, Ḥawqal, Kitāb Ṣūrat al-Arḍ, Kramers, J. H., 2 vols. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 2, Leiden, 1938–1939 2).Google Scholar
Ibn, al-Athīr, Al-Kāmil fīʾl-Ta'rīkh: Chronicon quod perfectissimum inscribitur, ed. Tornberg, C. J., 12 vols. (Leiden, 1851–76, reprint: Beirut, 1965–6).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risālah, ed. al-Dahān, S. (Damascus, 1960).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Togan, A.Z.V. (ed. trans.), Ibn Faḍdlān's Reisebericht (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 24.3, Leipzig, 1939).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Kovalevskij, A. P. (trans.), Kniga Akhmeda ibn Fadlana o ego putešestvii na Volgu v 921–922 gg. (Khar'kov, 1956).Google Scholar
Ibn, Khurdādhbih, Kitāb al-Masālik wa'l-Mamālik: Liber viarum et regnorum, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum., vi, Leiden, 1889).Google Scholar
Ibn, Miskawaih, Tajārub al-Umam, ed. Amedroz, H. F., 3 vols. (Oxford, 1920, reprint, Baghdad, n.d.).Google Scholar
Idem, , “O dvukh karakhanidskikh kaganatakh” Narody Azii i Afriki (1968), No. I.Google Scholar
Idem, , “The Polovcians and Rus',” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Idem, , Po sledam drevnekhorezmijskoj civilizacii (Moskva–Leningrad, 1948).Google Scholar
Jarring, G., Uzbek Texts from Afghan Turkistan (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N.F. Avd. i, vol. 34, Nr. 2, Lund–Leipzig, 1938).Google Scholar
Juzjānī, , Ṭabaḳāt-i Nāṭirī, A General History of the Muḥammadan Dynasties of Asia, including Hindūstān from A.H. 194 (810 A.D.) to A.H. 658 (1260 A.D.) and the Irruption of the Infidel Mughals into Islām, trans. Raverty, H. G., 2 vols. (Bibliotheca Indica, New Series, vols. 272–3, London, 1881, reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Kafesoǧlu, I., Harezmşahler devleti tarihi (Ankara, 1956).Google Scholar
Kafesoǧlu, I., Sultan Melikşah devrinde büyük Selçuklu imparatorluǧu (Istanbul, 1953).Google Scholar
Karaev, O., Arabo-persidskie istočhniki o tjurkskikh narodakh (Frunze, 1973).Google Scholar
Kljashtornyj, S. G., 1964, Drevnetjurkskie runicheskie pamjatniki kak istochnik po istorii Srednej Azii (Moskva).Google Scholar
Kljaštornyĭ, S. G., “Sogdijcy v Semirech'e,” Sovetskaja êtnografija (1959), No. I.Google Scholar
Kljaštornyĭ, S. G., Drevnetjurkskie runičeskie pamjatniki kak istočnik po istorii Srednej Azii (Moskva, 1964).Google Scholar
Köprülü, M. F., Türk edebiyatmda ilk mutasavviflar (Istanbul, 1919, reprint, Ankara, 1966).Google Scholar
Köymen, M., “Büyük Selç;uklu imparatorluǧu tarihinde Oǧuz istilasi,” Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coǧrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (1947).Google Scholar
Köymen, M., Selçuklu devri Türk tarihi (Ankara, 1963).Google Scholar
Kumekov, B. E., Gosudarstvo Kimekov 1X–X1 vv. po arabskim istočnikam (Alma-Ata, 1972).Google Scholar
Kuzeev, R. G., Proiskhozhdenie baškirskogo naroda (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Ligeti, L., “Egy karluk törzs neve kínai átírásban,” Magyar Nyelv 45 (1949).Google Scholar
Ligeti, L., “À propos du ‘Rapport sur les rois demeurant dans le Nord’” Études Tibétaines dédiées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Liu, Mau-tsai, Die Chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Türken, (T'u-küe), 2 vols. (Göttinger Asiatische Forschungen, vol. 10, Wiesbaden, 1958).Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, al-Kāshgharī, Dîwân Lûghat al-Turk, facs. ed. Atalay, B. (Ankara, 1941).Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, al-Kāshgharī, Turkish translation by Atalay, B., Dîvânu Lûgat-it-Türk, 3 vols. (Ankara, 1939–1941).Google Scholar
Malov, S. E., Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti (Moskva–Leningrad, 1951).Google Scholar
Marquart, J., Über das Volkstum der Komanen, in Bang, W., Marquart, J., Osttürkische Dialektstudien (Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, n.F., vol. 13, Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., “Novye Epigrafičeskie dannye dlja istorii Srednej Azii IX v.,” Êpigrafika Vostoka, 5 (1951).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., ögel, B., Islâmiyetten öonce Türk kültür tarihi (Ankara, 1962).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., Türk mitolojisi (Selçuklu tarih ve medeniyeti enstitüsü yayinlan, vol. I), vol. I (Ankara, 1971).Google Scholar
Mujmal al-Tawārīkh, ed. Bahār, M. (Tehran, 1318/1939).Google Scholar
Müneccimbaṣt Ṣeyh Ahmed Dede Efendi'nin “Cami' üd-Düvel” adli eserinden: Karahanltlar, Turk, trans. Lugal, N. (Istanbul, 1940).Google Scholar
Münejjimbashï, : text available only in Turkish translations: Ṣaḥāʾif al-Akhbār, Turk. trans. Nedim, Aḥmed, 3 vols. (Istanbul, 1285/1868).Google Scholar
Neshrī, , Kitab-i Cihan-nüma, ed. Unat, F. R., Köymen, M. A., 2 vols. (Ankara, 1949–57).Google Scholar
Niẓām, al-Mulk, Siyāsat-Nāmah, ed. Qazwīnī, M., Chahārdihī, M. (Tehran, 1334/1956).Google Scholar
Niẓām, al-Mulk, The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, trans. Darke, H. (London, 1960).Google Scholar
Ogel, B., Turk mitolojisi (Ankara, 1971), 1 –9, 596.Google Scholar
Petrov, K. I., Očerk proiskhoždenija kirgizskogo naroda (Frunze, 1963).Google Scholar
Petruševskij, I. P., “Pokhod mongol'skikh vojsk v Srednjuju Aziju v 1219–1224 gg. i ego posledstvija,” Tataro-Mongoly v Azii i Evrope, ed. Tikhvinskiĭ, S. L. (Moskva, 1970).Google Scholar
Petrushevskiî, LP., “Pokhod mongol'skikh vojsk v Srednjuju Aziju v 1219–1224 gg. i ego posledstvija” in Tikhvinskiî, S.L. (ed.), Tataro-Mongoly v Azii i Europe (Moskva, 1970).Google Scholar
Potapov, L. P., Êtničeskiĭ sostav i proiskhoždenie Altaicev (Leningrad, 1969).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Karachanidische Streitfragen,” Oriens, 3 (1950).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Von den Karluk zu den Karachaniden,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 101 (1951).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Āl-i Burhān,” Der Islam, 30 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritsak, O., “The Decline of the Empire of the Oghuz Yabghu,” The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the United States, 2.2 (1952).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Der Untergang des Reiches des Oġuzischen Yabġu,” Fuad Köprülü Armaǧani (İstanbul, 1953).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Die Karachaniden,” Der Islam, 31 (1953–4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Qara. Studien zur türkischen Rechtssymbolik,” Symbolae in Honorem, Z.V. Togan (Istanbul, 1950–5).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, 1954, “Die 24 T'a-chên. Studie zur Geschichte des Verwaltungsaufbaus der Hsiung-nu Reiche,” Oriens Extremus 1.Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Jāmi' al-Tawārīkh ed. Romaskevich, A. A., Khetagurov, A. A., Ali-zade, A. A., vol. I/I (Moskva, 1965).Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Sbornik letopiseĭ, Russ. trans. Khetagurov, A. A., vol. I/I (Moskva–Leningrad, 1952).Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Die Geschichte der Oġuzen des Rashīd ad-Dīn, Germ, trans. Jahn, K. (Wien, 1969).Google Scholar
Romodin, V. A. (ed.), Materialy po istorii Kirgizov i Kirgizii, vyp. I (Moskva, 1973).Google Scholar
Samolin, W., East Turkistan to the Twelfth Century (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Senigova, T.N., Srednevekovyi Taraz (Alma-Ata, 1972).Google Scholar
Senigova, T. N., “Voprosy ideologii i kul'tov Semireč'ja (VI–VII vv.),” Novoe v Arkheologii Kazakhstana, ed. Kadyrbaev, M. K. (Alma-Ata, 1968).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., Uzbeki-Karluki, istoriko-êtnografičeskij očerk (Tashkent, 1964).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., “Uzy”, Obšcestvennye Nauki v Uzbekistane (1970), No. 2.Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., “K voprusu rasselenija i rodovykh delenii Kangly,” in Ziiaev, Kh. Z. (ed.), Êtnografičeskoe izučenie byta i kul'tury Uzbekov (Tashkent, 1972).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., K êtnicheskoj istorii uzbekskogo naroda (lstoriko-êtnografičeskoe issledovanie na materialakh kipčakskogo komponenta) (Tashkent, 1974).Google Scholar
Shaw, R. B., “A Grammar of the Language of Eastern Turkistan” Part I, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Bengal, 1877.Google Scholar
Sümer, F., Oĝuzlar (Ankara, 1967).Google Scholar
Togan, A.Z.V., Umumî Türk tarihine giriş, 2nd ed. (İstanbul, 1970) vol. I (all published).Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P., Drevnij Khorezm (Moskva, 1948).Google Scholar
Turan, O., Selçuklular tarihi ve Türk-İslâm medeniyeti (Türk Kültürünü Araştirma Enstitüsü yayinlari, 7, Ankara, 1965).Google Scholar
Volin, S. L. et al. (ed.), Materialy po istorii Turkmen i Turkmenii, 2 vols. (Moskva–Leningrad, 1938–9), vol. I.Google Scholar
Volin, S. L., “Svedenija arabskikh istočnikov IX–XVI vv. o doline reki Talas i smezhnykh rajonakh,” Trudy Instituta Istorii, Arkheologii i Êtnografii Akadetnii Nauk Kazakhskoj SSR (1960).Google Scholar
von Le Coq, A., Türkçe Mânî elyazilari, trans. Köseraif, F. (İstanbul, 1936).Google Scholar
Yāqūt, , Mu'jam al-Buldān, 5 vols. (Beirut, 1957).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×