Early and medieval Tibet

Helmut Hoffman

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.015

14 - Early and medieval Tibet

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Helmut Hoffman

Edited by

Denis Sinor

Show author details

Helmut Hoffman: Affiliation:
Indiana University
Denis Sinor: Affiliation:
Indiana University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Pre- and early history

At our present level of knowledge, we cannot define with certainty the boundaries between pre- and early history. This is due, on the one hand, to the fact that systematic excavations in Tibet and bordering regions have not yet been possible, nor are they to be expected in the near future. On the other hand we have access to the ancient Chinese historical works which contain historical and ethnographical data on the “barbarian peoples,” information which we must certainly use in spite of the fact that it is frequently adulterated with contemporary interpolations. In such sources one must also distinguish between the data which refer to those peoples who directly bordered the Chinese upland and had trade or military relations with the Chinese, and the data on those peoples who are merely mentioned from hearsay but had no direct contact with the Chinese and concerning whom certain “barbarian clichés” existed which, of course, have no historical value. Frequent mention is made for instance of the immorality of women who belonged to the various foreign peoples, information which simply shows that they had different sexual mores from those acceptable in China. Among the Tibetans and related peoples this would refer to the social institution of polyandry.

When we turn to the few available archeological finds, it is evident that their value is rather meager, consisting as they do of objects which have been found on the earth's surface or were unearthed by a slight scratching of the soil and that quite by chance.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia , pp. 371 - 399

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, Leonhard und Hermann, Trimborn, 1958, Lehrbuch der Völkerkunde (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Aufschnaiter, P., 1956–57, “Prehistoric Sites Discovered in Inhabited Regions of Tibet,” East and West 7.Google Scholar

Bacot, Jacques, 1935, “Le mariage chinois du roi Sron bean sgan po (extrait du Mani bka' 'bum),” Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques III.Google Scholar

Bacot, Jacques, 1940–1946, Documents de Touen-houang relatifs à l'histoire du Tibet, Annales du Musée Guimet, tome 51 (DTH) (Paris).Google Scholar

Bogoslovskij, V. A., 1972, Essai sur l'histoire du peuple tibétain, ou la naissance d'une société de classes (Paris).Google Scholar

Demiéville, Paul, 1952, Le concile de Lhasa. Une controverse sur le quiétisme entre bouddhistes de l'lnde et de la Chine au Vllle siècle de l'ère chrétienne, Bibliothèque de l'Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, Vol. VII (Paris).Google Scholar

Eberhard, W., 1942, Kultur und Siedlung der Kandvölker Chinas, T'oung Pao, supplément au vol. 36 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Eberhard, W., 1942, 1942–3, “Die Kultur der alten zentral- und west-asiatischen Völker nach chinesischen Quellen,” Zeitschrift f¨r Ethnologie 73.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Alfonsa, 1958, Mk'yen brtse's Guide to the Holy Places of Central Tibet, completed and edited by Luciano Petech, with the collaboration of Hugh Richardson, Serie Orientale Roma xvi (Rome).Google Scholar

Francke, A. H., 1926, “Antiquities of Indian Tibet,” Archaeological Survey of India, New Imperial Series, Vol. L, II (Calcutta).Google Scholar

Franke, O., 1936–7, Geschichte des Chinesischen Reiches, Vols. 2 and 3 (Berlin/Leipzig).Google Scholar

Haarh, Erik, 1969a, “The Identity of Tsu-chi-chien, the Tibetan ‘king’ who died in 804 A.D.,” Acta Orientalia, 25.Google Scholar

Haarh, Erik, 1969b, The Yar-lun Dynasty, A study with particular regard to the contribution by myths and legends to the history of Ancient Tibet and the origin and nature of its kings (Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Helmut, 1950, Quellen zur Geschichte der tibetischen Bon-Religion, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jahrgang 1950, Nr. 4 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Helmut, 1967, “Žaṅ-žuṅ: the Holy Language of the Tibetan Bonpo,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 117.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Helmut, 1971, “The Tibetan Names of the Saka and the Sogdians,” Asiatische Studien 25.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Helmut, 1972, Tibet. A Handbook, Indiana University Oriental Series, vol. 5 (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar

Karmay, Samten G., 1972, The Treasury of Good Sayings: A Tibetan History of Bon, London Oriental Series, Vol. 26 (London).Google Scholar

Li, Fang-kuei, 1959, “Tibetan glo-ban-'dring,” Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren Dedicata (Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Lokesh, Chandra and Namdak, Tenzin (editors), 1968, History and Doctrine of Bon-po Nispanna-Yoga (Tibetan Text), Satapitaka Series 73 (New Delhi).Google Scholar

Mole, , 1979 and the data in Franke vol. 3.

Molè, G., 1970, The T'u-yü-hun from the Northern Wei to the Time of the Five Dynasties, Serie Orientale Roma xli (Rome).Google Scholar

Namdak, Tenzin, 1966, Mdzod phug: basic verses and commentary by Dran-pa nammhha' (Delhi) [Tibetan text only].Google Scholar

Obermiller, E., 1932, History of Buddhism by Bu-ston (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Pelliot, Paul, 1961, Histoire ancienne du Tibet, Oeuvres posthumes de Paul Pelliot, Vol. 5 (Paris).Google Scholar

Pelliot, Paul, 1963, Notes on Marco Polo, II (Paris 1963).Google Scholar

Petech, Luciano, 1939, A Study on the Chronicles of Ladakh, Indian Tibet (Calcutta).Google Scholar

Petech, Luciano, 1946, “Alcuni nomi geografici nel La-dvags-rgyal-rabs,” RSO xxii (Rome 1947).Google Scholar

Richardson, Hugh E., 1952, Ancient Historical Edicts at Lhasa and the Mu Tsung/ Khri Gtsug Lde Brtsan Treaty of A.D. 821–822 from the Inscription at Lhasa, Prize Publication Fund, Vol. 19 (London).Google Scholar

Richardson, Hugh E., 1954, “A Ninth Century Inscription from Rkon-po,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar

Richardson, Hugh E., 1957, “A Tibetan Inscription from Rgyal-lha-khan, and a Note on Tibetan Chronology from A.D. 841 to A.D. 1042,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar

Richardson, Hugh E., 1971, “Who was Yum-brtan,” Études Tibétaines dédiées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou (Paris).Google Scholar

Roerich, George N., 1930, The Animal Style among the Nomad Tribes of Northern Tibet (Prague).Google Scholar

Roerich, George N., 1931, “Problems of Tibetan Archaeology,” Urusvati Journal I.Google Scholar

Roerich, George N., 1949–53, The Blue Annals, 2 vols., Royal Asiatic Society, Monograph Series Vol. VII (Calcutta).

Róna-Tas, A., 1955, “Social Terms in the List of Grants of the Tibetan Tun-huang Chronicle,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.Google Scholar

Schlegel, G., 1896, Die chinesische Inschrift auf dem uigurischen Denkmal in Kara Balgassun, Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne, v.

Schlegel, Gustav, “Die chinesische Inschrift auf dem uigurischen Denkmal in Kara Balgassun,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. 9: I–XV, 1–141 (1896).Google Scholar

Shakabpa, Tsepon W. D., 1967, Tibet. A Political History (Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Snellgrove, David and Richardson, Hugh, 1968, A Cultural History of Tibet (New York and Washington).Google Scholar

Stein, R. A., 1961, Une chronique ancienne de bSam-yas: sBa-bzed, Edition du texte tibétain et résumé français, (Publications de l'Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, Textes et documents Vol. I (Paris).Google Scholar

Stein, R. A., 1972, Tibetan Civilization, translated (from the original French) by Driver, J. E. Stapleton (London).Google Scholar

Thomas, F. W., 1948, Nam. An Ancient Language of the Sino-Tibetan Borderland (London).Google Scholar

Thomas, F. W., 1935, 1951, 1953, 1963, Tibetan Literary Texts and Documents, 4 vols. (London).Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1949, Tibetan Painted Scrolls, Vol. I (Rome).Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1950, The Tombs of the Tibetan Kings, Serie Orientale Roma i (Rome).Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1955–6, “The Sacral Character of the Kings of Ancient Tibet,” East and West 6.Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1956, Preliminary Report on two scientific expeditions in Nepal, Serie Orientale Roma X, i (Rome).Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1958, Minor Buddhist Texts, part ii, Serie Orientale Roma ix, 2 (Rome).Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1962, “The wives of Sron-btsan-sgam-po,” Oriens Extremus, 9.Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe, 1973, Transhimalaya, translated from the French by James Hogarth (London).Google Scholar

Uray, G., 1960, “The Four Horns of Tibet according to the Royal Annals,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 10.Google Scholar

Uray, G., 1962, “The Offices of the Brun-pas and Great Mnans and the Territorial Division of Central Tibet in the Early 8th Century,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15.Google Scholar

Book contents

14 - Early and medieval Tibet

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive