Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:31:13.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Denis Sinor
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ʿAta-Malik, Juvainī, Ta'rīkh-i Jahān Gushā: The History of the World-Conqueror, trans. Boyle, J. A., 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1958).Google Scholar
Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, (“The Regions of the World”), trans. Minorsky, V. F. (Gibb Memorial Series, New Series, XI, London, 1937, 2nd rev. ed. London, 1970).Google Scholar
Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam (“The Regions of the World”), trans. Minorsky, Vladimir (Gibb Memorial Series, New Series, xi, 2nd rev. ed., London, 1970).Google Scholar
(Orkun), Hüseyin Namik, Peçenekler (“The Pechenegs”) (Istanbul, 1933).Google Scholar
(Pseudo-)Movsēs, Khorenats'i: Géographie de Moïse de Corène, ed., trans. Soukry, A. (Venise, 1881).Google Scholar
Aalto, PenttiPekkanen, Tuomo, 1975, Latin Sources on North-Eastern Eurasia, I–II, Asiatische Forschungen vol. 44 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Abaev, V. I., 1949, “Skifskij jazyk,” [The Scythian Language], in: Osetinskij jazyk i fol ' klor I, pp. 147–244 (Moscow).Google Scholar
Abaev, V. I., 1965, Skifo-evropejskie izoglossy, [Scythian-European Isoglosses] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Abe, Takeo, Nishi-Uiguru kokushi no kenkyū (Research on the history of the West Uighurs; Kyoto, 1958).Google Scholar
Abramova, M. P., 1952, “Kul'tura sarmatskikh piemen II v. do n.ê.–I v. n.ê.,” [The Culture of the Sarmatian Tribes from the 2nd century B.C. to the 1st century A.D.], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1959, 1, pp. 52–71.Google Scholar
Abramzon, C. M., Kirgizy i ikh ėtnogenetičeskie i istoriko-kul'turnye svjazi (Leningrad, 1971).Google Scholar
Abramzon, S. M., 1971, Kirgizy i ikh êtnogeneticheskie i istoriko-kul'turnye svjazy, (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Abu, Ḥ;āmid al-Gharnāṭī, Tuḥfat al-Albāb wa Nukhbat al-'Ajāʾīb (“The Gift of the Hearts and Selection of the Wonders”): Abu Ḥāmid el-Grenadino y su relación de viaje por tierras eurasiáticas, ed. trans. Dubler, C. E. (Madrid, 1953).Google Scholar
Abu, Ḥāmid al-Gharnāṭī, Tuḥfat al-Albāb wa Nukhbat al- ‘Ajāʾib (“The Gift of the Hearts and Selection of the Wonders”): Abu Ḥāmid el Grenadino y su relación de viaje por tierras eurasiáticas, ed., trans. Dubler, C. E. (Madrid, 1953).Google Scholar
Abu'l, Faḍl Baihaqī, Ta'rīkh-i Baihaqī, ed. Ghanī, Q., Fayyāḍ, ʿA. (Tehran, 1324/1945.Google Scholar
Abu'l, Faḍl Baihaqī, Russ. trans. Arends, K., Abu-l Faz̤l Baihaḳī, Istoriia Masʿūda (1030–1041), 2nd rev. ed. (Pamjatniki Pis'mennosti Vostoka, 22, Moskva, 1969).Google Scholar
Abu'l-Fidā, , Taqwīm al-Buldān (“Geography of the Lands”): Géographie d'Aboulféda, ed. Reinaud, R., Slane, M. Le Bon >MacGuckin (Paris, 1840).Google Scholar
,Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R., 1974, Fiziko-geograficheskij atlas mira (Moscow).
Adam, Leonhard und Hermann, Trimborn, 1958, Lehrbuch der Völkerkunde (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Adamenko, O. M., 1970, “O geologicheskikh nizhnepaleoliticheskikh orudijakh na r. Ulalinke (g. Gorno-Altajsk),” in: Sibir' i ee sosedi v drevnosti, (Novosibirsk), pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Adamus, Bremensis, Gesta Hamburgensis Ecclesiae Pontificum, ed. Schmeidler, B. (MGH. Scriptores in usum scholarum, Hannover–Leipzig, 1917).Google Scholar
Agadžanov, S. G., Očerki istorii oguzov i turkmen Srednej Azii IX–XII vv. (Ashkhabad, 1969).Google Scholar
Agathias, , Agathiae Myrinae, Historiarum libri quinque, ed. Keydell, R. (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, 11, Berlin, 1967).Google Scholar
Agrawala, V. S. 1950, “Catalogue of the Mathura Museum,” The Journal of the Uttar Pradesh Historical Society, 23, pts. 1–2.Google Scholar
Ahrens, K.Krüger, G., 1899, Die sogenannte Kirchengeschichte des Zacharias Rhetor, Bibliotheca Teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Turkic Orkhon inscriptions: Aidarov, G., Jazyk orkhonskikh pamjatnikov drevnetjurkskoĭ pis'mennosti (Alma-Ata, 1971).Google Scholar
Aidarov, G., Jazyk orkhonskikh pamjatnikov drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti VIII veka (Alma-Ata, 1971).Google Scholar
Aininiskiĭ, S. A., “Izvestija vengerskikh missionerov XIII–XV vv. o Tatarakh i Vostočnoĭ Evrope,” Istoričeskiĭ Arkhiv, III (1940).Google Scholar
Akhinžanov, S. M., “Kipchaki i Khorezm v kanun mongol'skogo našestvija,” Vestnik Akademii Nauk Kazakhskoj SSR (1970), No. I.Google Scholar
Al-Ḥusainī, , Akhbār al-Dawlah al-Saljuqīyah (Lahore, 1933).Google Scholar
Al-Ḥusainī, , Turk, trans. Lügal, N., Ahbar üd-devlet is-Selçuktyye (Türk Tarih Kurumu yaym-lanndan, 2nd series, vol. 8, Ankara, 1943).Google Scholar
Al-Ṭabarī, , Ta'rīkh al-Ṭabarī (“The History of al-Ṭabarī”), ed. Ibrāhīm, Muḥammad Abu'l-Faḍl, 10 vols. (Dhakhāʾir al-'Arab, 30, Cairo, 1962–1967).Google Scholar
Al-Ṭabarī, , Ta'rīkh al-Ṭabarī, ed. Ibrāhīm, Muḥammed Abu'l Faḍl, 10 vols. (Dhakhāʾir al-'Arab, 30, Cairo, 1964–70).Google Scholar
Al-Bakrī: Kunik'A, Rozen' A, Rozen', , V., “Izvestija al-Bekri o Rusi i lavjanakh i, “Zapiski Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk,” 32 (1878).
Al-Bakrī: Kunik, A., Rozen, V., “Izvestija al-Bekri o slavjanakh i ikh sosedjakh,” Zapiski Imperatorskoĭ Akademii Nauk 32 (1878).Google Scholar
Al-Balādhurī, Kitāb Futūḥ al-Buldān (“The Book of the Conquest of the Lands”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Leiden, 1895).Google Scholar
Al-Balādhurī, , Futūḥ al-Buldān, ed. Raḍwān, R. M. (Cairo, 1959).Google Scholar
Al-Bīrūnī, , Athār al-Baqīyah, ed. Sachau, E. (1876, reprint Leipzig, 1923).Google Scholar
Al-Bīrūnī, , Kitāb al-Jamāhir fī Ma'rifat al-Jawāhir, ed. Krenkow, S. (Ḥaidarābād, 1355/1936–7).Google Scholar
Al-Dimashqī, , Nukhbat al-Dahr fī‘Ajāʾib al-Barr wa'l-Baḥr: Cosmographie de Chems ed-din abu Abdallah Mohammed ed Dimachqui, ed. Mehren, F. (St. Petersbourg, 1866).Google Scholar
Al-Dimashqī, , trans.: Manuel de la cosmographie du Moyen Age, trans. Mehren, F. (Copenhagen, 1874).Google Scholar
Al-Iṣṭakhrī, , Kitāb Masālik al-Mamālik: Viae regnorum,” ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 1 Leiden, 1870).
Al-Iṣṭakhrī, , Kitāb Masālik al-Mamālik, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, I, Leiden, 19272).Google Scholar
Al-Idrīsī, , Kitāb Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Afāq: Opus Geographicum sive “Liber ad eorum delectationem qui terras peragrare studeant,” ed. Cerulli, E., Gabrieli, F. et al. fasc. 17 (Leiden, 1970–8).Google Scholar
Al-Idrīsī, , Kitāb Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Afāq: Opus Geographicum sive “Liber ad eorum delectationem qui terras peragrare studeant,” ed. Cerulli, E., Gabrieli, F. et al. fasc. 1–9 (Leiden, 1970–1984).Google Scholar
Al-Idrīsī, , Kitāb Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Āfāq: Opus Geographicum, ed. Rubinacci, R. et al., fasc. 1–9 (Leiden–Rome–Naples, 1970–84).Google Scholar
Al-Kāshgharī, Maḥmūd, Divanü Lǔgat-it-Türk, facs. ed. Atalay, Besim (Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara, 1941).Google Scholar
Al-‘Utbī, , Ta'rikh al-Yamīnī with commentary of al-Manīnī, Shaykh Aḥmad b. 'Alī (Cairo, 1268/1869).Google Scholar
Al-Maqdisī, , Kitāb al-Bad' wa'l-Tawārīkh (“The Book of Creation and the Histories”), ed. Huart, C., 6 vols. (Paris, 1899–1919, reprint: Tehran, 1962).Google Scholar
Al-Marwazī, , Ṭabāʾi al-Ḥayawān (“The Nature of Animals”): Sharaf al-Zamān Ṭāhir Marwazīon China, the Turks and India, ed. trans. Minorsky, V. F. (London, 1942).Google Scholar
Al-Marwazī, : Sharāf al-Zamān Tāhir Marvazī on China, the Turks and India, ed. trans. Minorsky, V. F. (London, 1942).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī (?), , Akhbār al-Zamān wa man abādahu'l-Ḥidthān wa 'Ajāʾib al-Buldān wa Ghāmir bi'l-Ma' wa'ł-'Umrān [“The History of Times Past (lit. 'The Information of Times which Eveñts have exterminated) and the Wonders of the Lands and Wastes on Water and Cultivated Lands”] (Beirut, 1966).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdi, , Kitāb al-Tanbīh wa'l Ishrāf (“The Book of Admonition and Recension”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, VIII, Leiden, 1894).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Kitāb al-Tanbīh wa'l-Ishrāf (“The Book of Admonition and Recension”), ed. Goeje, M. J., (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum., viii, Leiden, 1894).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj al-Dhahab wa Maʿādin al-Jawhar (“Meadows of Gold and Mines of Precious Stones”), ed. Pellat, C. (Beirut, 1966–79) 7 vols.Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj adh-Dhahab wa Ma ʿādin al-Jawhar, ed. Pellat, C., 7 vols. (Beirut, 1966–1979).Google Scholar
Al-Muqaddasī, , Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm fī Ma'rifat al-Aqālīm (“The Best of Divisions Regarding Knowledge of the Climes”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, III, Leiden, 1906).Google Scholar
Al-Nadīm, , Kitāb al-Fihrist (“The Index”), ed. Flügel, G. (Leipzig, 1871–2, reprint: Beirut, 1964).Google Scholar
Al-Nadīm, , The Fihrist of al-Nadim, trans, ed. Dodge, B., 2 vols. (Records of Civilization: Sources and Studies, 83, New York–London, 1970).Google Scholar
Al-Ya'qūbī, , Kitāb al-Buldān, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 7 Leiden, 1892).Google Scholar
Al-Ya'qūbī, , Ta'rīkh (“The History”) (Beirut, 1390/1970).Google Scholar
Al-Ya'qūbī, , Ta'rīkh, (Beirut, 1390/1970) 2 vols.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A., 1950, “Die ethische Grenzscheide am römischen Limes,” Schweizer Beiträge zur Allgemeinen Geschichte 8, pp. 35–50 – the following entry is an English version of the same article:.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A., 1952, “The Moral Barrier on Rhine and Danube,” in Congress of Roman Frontier Studies, edited by Birley, E., pp. 1–16 (Durham).Google Scholar
Aliev, S. M., “O datirovke nabega rusov upomjanutykh Ibn Isfandijarom i Amoli,” In Tveritinova, A. S. (ed.), Vostočnye istočniki po istorii narodov jugo-vostočnoĭ i central'noĭ Evrope, 2 vols. (Moskva, 1964, 1969), vol. ii.Google Scholar
Alikhova, A. E., “K voprosu o burtasakh,” Sovetskaja Êtnografija, no. 1 (1949).Google Scholar
Altheim, F., Stiel, R., “Michael der Syrer über die erste Auftreten der Bulgaren und Chazaren”, Byzantion, xxviii (1958).Google Scholar
Altheim, Franz, 1962–75, Geschichte der Hunnen, I–V (Berlin). [This work has been written with the collaboration of many scholars. Extreme caution is recommended in its use, since it is replete with gratuitous hypotheses].Google Scholar
Ammianus Marcellinus, 1939, With an English Translation by Rolfe, John C., I–III (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Ančabadze, Z. B., “Kipčaki severnogo Kavkaza po dannym gruzinskikh letopisӗi XI – XIV vekov,” in Treskov, I. V. et al. (eds.), Materialy naučnoĭ sessii po probleme proiskhoždenie balkarskogo i karačaevskogo narodov (Nal'čik, 1960).Google Scholar
Andersson, J. G., 1943, “Researches into the Pre-History of the Chinese”, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 15.Google Scholar
Angelov, D., Gjuzelev, V., ‘Izvestija v armjansk izvori za srednevekovnata istorija na Bŭlgarija,” Istoričeski Pregled, 22.1 (1966).Google Scholar
Angelov, D., Gjuzelev, V., Obrazuvanie na bŭlgarskata narodnost (Sofija, 1971).Google Scholar
Ankori, Zvi, Karaites in Byzantium (New York – Jerusalem, 1959).Google Scholar
Annales Bertiniani: Annales de Saint-Bertin, ed. Grat, F., Vielliard, J., Clémencet, S., intro. notes by Levillain, L. (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Annales Fuldenses, ed. Kurze, F. (MGH. Scriptores in usum scholarum, XIII, Hannover, 1891).Google Scholar
Anokhin, V. A., 1965, “Monety skifskogo carja Atei,” [The Coins of the Scythian King Atheas], Numizmatika i sfragristika (Kiev), 2, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, trans. Minorsky, V. F. (E.J. W. Gibb Memorial New Series, 11, London, 1937, reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Anuchin, V. A., 1948, Geograficheskie ocherki Man'chzhurii (Moscow).Google Scholar
Arkheologicheskie pamjatniki Jakutii, bassejny Aldana i Olekmy, 1983, edited by Mochanov, Ju. A., (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I.Očerk drevneĭšӗi istorii Khazar (Leningrad, 1936).Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I.Belaja Beža,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija 16 (1952), pp. 42–76. Istorija khazar (Leningrad, 1962).Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I., 1949, “Etnogeografija Skifii” [The ethno-geography of Scythia], UZLGU, issue 13, No. 85, pp. 129–71.Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I., 1950, “K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii skifov” [On the question of the Origin of the Scythians], VD1 2, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I., 1966, Sokrovishcha skifskikh kurganov [Treasures of Scythian Kurgans], (Praha– Leningrad).Google Scholar
Artamonov, M. I., 1972, “Skifskoe carstvo” [The Scythian Kingdom], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1972, 3.Google Scholar
Ašmarin, N. I., Bolgary i Čuvašy (Kazan', 1902).Google Scholar
Asołig, : Histoire universelle par Etienne Açoghig de Daron, trans. DuLaurier, E., 2 vols., (Paris, 1883–1917).Google Scholar
Aufschnaiter, P., 1956–57, “Prehistoric Sites Discovered in Inhabited Regions of Tibet,” East and West 7, pp. 74–95.Google Scholar
Avenarius, A., 1974, Die Awaren in Europa (Amsterdam-Bratislava).Google Scholar
Bachrach, Bernard S., 1973, A History of the Alans in the West (Minneapolis). [The histories of the Huns and Alans are closely intertwined].Google Scholar
Bacot, J., “Reconnaissance en Haute Asie Septentrionale par cinq envoyés Ouigours au VIIIe siècle,” Journal Asiatique, 244 (1956), pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
Bacot, Jacques, 1935, “Le mariage chinois du roi Sron bean sgan po (extrait du Mani bka' 'bum),” Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques III, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Bacot, Jacques, 1940–1946, Documents de Touen-houang relatifs à l'histoire du Tibet, Annales du Musée Guimet, tome 51 (DTH) (Paris).Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W., 1937, “Ttaugara,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies 8, pp. 883–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, H. W., 1947, “Recent Works on Tokharian,” Transactions of the Philological Society, pp. 126–53 (London).Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W., 1970a, “Saka Studies: The Ancient Kingdom of Khotan,” Iran. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies 8, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W., 1970b, “Tokharika,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W., 1971, “The Kingdom of Khotan,” Papers on Far Eastern History 4, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Bakay, K., 1973, “Az avarkor időrendjéről,” Somogyi Múzeumok Közleményei I, pp. 5–86.Google Scholar
Bal'amī, , Tārīkh-i Ṭabarī: Chronique de Abou Djafar Mohammad ben Djarir ben Yezid Tabari (traduite sur la version persane d'Abou 'Ali Mohammed Bel'amī, trans. Zotenberg, H., 4 vols. (Paris, 1867–74).Google Scholar
Bal'amī, , Tarjuma-i Tārīkh-i Ḥabari, Lithographic, ed. Minovi, M. of ms. 7481 of Jerusalem, al-Aksa Mosque Library (Teheran, 1345/1926–7, reprint: 1966).Google Scholar
Balcer, Jack M., 1972, “The Date of Herodotus IV. 1. Darius' Scythian Expedition,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76, pp. 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjea, J. N., 1962, “The Rise and Fall of the Kushana Empire,” in Comprehensive History of India edited by Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta, vol. 2, chapter 7, pp. 156–221 (Calcutta).Google Scholar
Bang, W. von and Gabain, A. von, “Türkische Turfan-Texte II,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 411–30 (1929).Google Scholar
Banner, JánosJakabfryImre, , 1954–68, Archäologische Bibliographie des Mittel-Donaubeckens, i–iii (Budapest). [A complete bibliography up to 1966].Google Scholar
Bar, Hebraeus, The Chronography of Gregory Abūʾl Faraj Bar Hebraeus, trans. Budge, E.A.T.W. (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Bárczi, G., Benkő, L., Berrár, J., A magyar nyelv története (Budapest, 1967).Google Scholar
Bárczi, Géza, A magyar nyelv életrajza (Budapest, 3rd ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Barfield, Thomas J., 1981, “The Hsiung-Imperial Confederacy: Organization and Foreign Policy,” Journal of Asian Studies 41, 1, pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barišić, F., 1953, Čuda Dimitrija (Beograd). [French summary].Google Scholar
Barišić, F. 1954, “Le siège de Constantinople par les Avares et les Slaves,” Byzantion 24, PP. 371–95.Google Scholar
Barkóczy, L., 1968, “A Sixth–Century Cemetery from Keszthely–Fenékpuszta”, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 20, pp. 275–311.Google Scholar
Barnea, I., “Predvaritel'nye svedenija o kamennykh pamjatnikakh v Bessarabii (obl. Dobrudža),” Dacia, New Series 7 (1962).Google Scholar
Bartha, Antal, Hungarian Society in the 9th and 10th Centuries (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Bartha, Antal, Czegléedy, Károly, Róna-Tas, András (eds.), Magyar őstörténeti tanulmányok (Budapest, 1977).Google Scholar
Barthold, W., 1935, 12 Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens, Deutsche Bearbeitung von Theodor Menzel, (Berlin).Google Scholar
Barthold, W., 1968, Turkestan Down to the Mongol Invasion, New Edition, (London).Google Scholar
Barthold, W. (Bartol'd, V. V.), Golden, Peter B.Khazar”, Enclopaedia of Islam2 (Leiden–London, 1960–1978, still in progress), vi.Google Scholar
Barthold, W., 1899, Die alttürkischen Inschriften und die arabischen Quellen, in Radloff, W., Die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, Zweite Folge (St. Pétersbourg).Google Scholar
Barthold, W., Histoire des Turcs d'Asie Centrale, tr. Donskis, M. (Initiation à l'Islam, vol. 3; Paris, 1945).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Basdžirt,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Bolgary,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Burtasy,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Socinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., (Enzyklopaedie des Islam, 4 vols., Leiden-Leipzig, 1913–36, 1).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Novyĭ trud o polovcakh,” Russkiĭ Istoričeskiĭ Žurnal – (1921).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., Mesto prikaspiĭskikh oblasteĭ v istorii musul' manskogo mira (Baku, 1925).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., reprinted Akademik V.V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moscow, 1963–73) 11/1.Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Kipčaki,” Akademik V.V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., v (Enziklopaedie des Islam, 4 vols., Leiden–Leipzig, 1913–36, 11).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Khazary,” Akademik V.V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–73), v.Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Arabskie izvestija o rusakh,” Sovetskoe vostokovedenija. 1 (1940).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–73) 11/1.Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Balasagun”, Akademik V.V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–1973), vol. III.Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., Dvenadcat′ lekcii po istorii tureckikh narodov Srednej Azii, Sočinenija, V: Germ. vers. (Barthold, W.), Zwölf Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens (1932–5, reprint Hildesheim, 1962).Google Scholar
Basham, A. L. (Editor), 1968, Papers on the Date of Kaniṣka, submitted to the Conference on the Date of Kaniṣka, London, 20–22 April, 1960 (Leiden 1968).Google Scholar
Basilevich, K. V., et al. (editors), 1950, Atlas istorii SSSR, vol. 1 (Moscow).Google Scholar
Baskakov, N. A., “Poloveckie otbleski v ‘Slove o polku Igorove’“, Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 48 (1976).Google Scholar
Batmanov, I. A.Kunaa, A. Ch., 1963, Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti Tuv: (Kyzyl).Google Scholar
Battal-Taymas, Abdullah, Kazan Türkleri (“The Turks of Kazan”) (Ankara, 1966).Google Scholar
Bazin, Louis, 1976, “Eine Inschrift vom Oberen Jenissei als Quelle zur Geschichte Zentralasiens,” Materialia Turcica, 2, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Bazin, Louis, 1974, Les calendriers turcs anciens et médiévaux (Lille).Google Scholar
Bazin, Louis, 1981, “Kül Tegin ou Kö1 Tegin?,” Scholia. Beiträge zur Turkologie und Zentralasienkunde. Annemarie von Gabain zum 80. Geburtstag am, 4. Juli 1981 dargebracht von Kollegen, Freunden und Schülern,. Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, Bd. 14, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Beal, S., 1906, Si-Yu-Ki, Buddhist Records of the Western World, 2 volumes (London).Google Scholar
Beckwith, Christopher I., 1979, “The Tibetan Empire in the West,” in Tibetan Studies in Honor of Hugh Richardson, pp. 30–8 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Begunov, Ju. K., Pamjatnik russkoĭ literatury xiii veka “Slovo o pogibeli russkoĭ zemli” (Moskva–Leningrad, 1965).Google Scholar
Belenitsky, (= Aleksandr, Belenickij, 1968, Central Asia. Translated from the Russian by Hogarth, James (Geneva). [Only some parts relevant to this chapter].Google Scholar
Bendefy, L., Fontes authentici itinera (1235–1338) Fr. Iuliani illustrantes, Archivum Europae Centro–Orientalis, III, (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd, Tanulmányok a magyar nyelv életrajza köréből (Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 40, Budapest, 1963–6).Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd, et al., A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára, 4 vols. (Budapest, 1967–84).Google Scholar
Benveniste, E., 1961, “Inscriptions de Bactriane,” Journal asiatique, pp. 113–51.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes, “Das Hunnische, Donaubolgarische und Wolgabolgarische,” in Deny, J. et al. (eds.), Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta (Wiesbaden, 1959 – still in progress), 1.Google Scholar
Berg, Lev, 1950, Natural Regions of the USSR, translated from the Russian by Titelbaum, Olga and edited by Morrison, John A. (New York).Google Scholar
Beševliev', V., pŭrvobŭlgarite, Verata na/Die Religion der Protobulgaren (Sofia, 1939).Google Scholar
Beševliev', V., pŭrvobŭlgarite, Verata naDie protobulgarischen Inschriften (Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten, 23, Berlin, 1963).Google Scholar
Beševliev, Veselin, 1963, Die protobulgarischen lnschriften (Berlin).Google Scholar
Bibliographia Archaeologica Hungarica, compiled by Németh, E., Fejér, Mária F., Jakabfry, Imre, published in Archeológiai Értesitő, 98 (1971), pp. 122–38; 99 (1972), pp. 132–48; 100 (1973), PP. 129–52; 101 (1974), PP. 161–83; 102 (1975), PP. 155–85; 103 (1976), PP. 147–70; 104 (1977), PP. 121–44; 104 (1978), pp. 140–60; 105 (1978), pp. 140–62; 106 (1979), PP. 152–74; 107 (1980), pp. 137–51.
Bičurin, N. Ja. (lakinf), Sohranie svedeniĭ o narodakh, obitavšikh v Sredneĭ Azii v drevnie vremena, 3 vols. (St. Petersburg, 1851), 2nd ed., 2 vols. (Moscow–Leningrad, 1950–3).
Bielenstein, Hans, 1956, Emperor Kuang-wu and the Northern Barbarians, The 17th Ernest Morrison Lecture in Ethnology, Canberra, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bivar, A.D.H., 1956, “The Kushana-Sassanian Coin Series,” Journal of the Numismatic Society of India, 18, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Bivar, A.D.H., 1963, “The Kaniṣka Dating from Surkh Kotal,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 26, pp. 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boba, Imre, Nomads, Northmen and Slavs (Slavo-Orientalia, 11 Wiesbaden–The Hague, 1967).Google Scholar
Bogoslovskij, V. A., 1972, Essai sur l'histoire du peuple tibétain, ou la naissance d'une société de classes (Paris).Google Scholar
Böhmer, J.F. –Mühlbacher, E.–Lechner, J. 1908, Regesta Imperii, I. Die Regesten des Kaiserreichs unter den Karolingern: 751–918 (Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S., 1974, History of Domestic Mammals in Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest).Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1964–1965, “Qutluy bolzun! A Contribution to the History of the Concept ‘Fortune’ among the Turks,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. 36, pp. 284–91; 38, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1970a, “Qui était ǰebu xak'an?,” Turcica, 2, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1970b, “On the Ancient Turkic Title eltäbär,” Proceedings of the IXth Meeting of the Permanent International Altaistic Conference, pp. 1–16 (Napoli).Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1971, “The Husbands of Princess Hsien-li Bilgä,” Studia Turcica, edited by Ligeti, L., pp. 103–23 (Budapest).Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1974, “On the Ancient Turkish Title ‘šaδ’”, Gururājamañjarikā. Studi in onore di Giuseppe Tucci, pp. 167–93 (Napoli).Google Scholar
Bombaci, Alessio, 1976, “On the Ancient Turkish Title šadapït,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. 48, pp. 32–41.Google Scholar
Bóna, I., 1971, “Ein Vierteljahrhundert Völkerwanderungsforschung in Ungarn (1945–1969),” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 23, pp. 265–336.Google Scholar
Bóna, I., 1971a, “Ein Vierteljahrhundert Völkerwanderungsforschung in Ungarn (1945–1969),” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 23, pp. 265–336.Google Scholar
Bóna, I., 1971b, A népvándorlás kora Fehérmegyében (Székesfehérvár).Google Scholar
Bóna, I., 1973 VII. századi avar települések és Árpád–kori magyar falu Dunaujvárosban (Budapest).Google Scholar
Bóna, I., 1979, “A Szegvár–sápoldali sír,” Archeológiai Értesitő, 106, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Bongard-Levin, G. M.Grantovskij, E. A., 1974, Ot Skifii do lndii. Zagadki istorii drevnikh ariev [From Scythia to India. Riddle of the History of the Ancient Aryans] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Boodberg, Peter A., 1936, “Two Notes on the History of the Chinese Frontier,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 1, pp. 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borisov, A. A., 1970, Klimatografija Sovetskogo Sojuza (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Boswell, A. Bruce, “The Kipchak Turks,” The Slavonic Review, 6 (1927).Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E., The Ghaznavids (Edinburgh, 1963).Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E., “The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World (A.D. 1000–1217),” The Cambridge History of Iran ed. Boyle, J. A., vol. 5 (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar
Boulnois, Luce, 1966, The Silk Road, translated from the French by Chamber-lain, Dennis (New York).Google Scholar
Boyce, Mary, 1975, A History of Zoroastrianism, vol. i, Orientalistik, Handbuch, Abteilung, Erste, 8. Band, Erster Abschnitt, Leiferung 2, Heft 2A (Leiden).Google Scholar
Brashinskij, I. B.Marchenko, K. K. 1980, “Elizavetovskoe gorodishche na Donu – poselenie gorodskogo tipa,” [Elizavetovskoe Gorodishche – a settlement of urban type], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1980, 1, pp. 211–18.Google Scholar
Bratianu, Georges, La mer Noire. Des origines à la conquête ottomane (Societas Academica Dacoromana, Acta Historica, ix, München, 1969).Google Scholar
Bretschneider, E., Medieval Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources, 2 vols. (London, 1888, reprint 1967).Google Scholar
Brough, John, 1965, “Comments on Third-Century Shan-shan and the History of Buddhism,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 28, pp. 582–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brough, John, 1970, “Supplementary Notes on the Third-Century Shan-shan,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 31, PP. 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James, J.Davis, Harold T., 1967, [translators] Zosimus: Historia Nova. The Decline of Rome (Trinity University Press).Google Scholar
Burmov, A., “Vŭprosi iz istorijata na prabŭlgarite,” Godišnik na Sofiĭkija Universitet, istoriko-filologičeski fakultet, 44.2 (1947).Google Scholar
Burmov, A., “Kŭm vŭprosa za proizkhod na prabŭlgarite,” Izvestija na Istoričeskot družestvo v Sofija 22–4 (1948).Google Scholar
Burrow, T., 1935, “Tokharian Elements in the Kharoṣṭhī Documents from Chinese Turkistan,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp. 667–75.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B., 1889. Reprinted 1958, History of the Later Roman Empire from the Death of Theodosius I. to the Death of Justinian, I–II (Dover Publications).Google Scholar
C̆ekalin, F., “Meščera i Burtasy po sokhranivšimsja o ikh pamjatnikam,” Trudy VIII Arkheologičeskago s"ezda, III (Moskva, 1897).Google Scholar
C̆ermecov, V. I., “Nižnee Priob'e v I tysjačeletii n.e.,” Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 58 (1957).Google Scholar
Cahen, C., “Le Malik-nameh et l'histoire des origines Seljoucides,” Oriens, 2 (1949), pp. 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahen, C., Pre-Ottoman Turkey, trans. Jones-Williams, J. (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Cannata, Patrizia, 1981, Profilo storico del I° impero turco (metà VI–metà VII secolo), Istituto di Studi dell'India e dell'Asia Orientale (Roma). [Possibly the best modern presentation of the Türk empire].Google Scholar
Chabot, J. B., 1899–1924, Chronique de Michel le Syrien, patriarche Jacobite d'Antioche, I–IV (Paris).Google Scholar
Chan, Hok-lam, 1970, Chin Historiography. Three Studies, Münchener Ostasiatische Studien (München).Google Scholar
Chan, Hok-lam, 1984, Legitimation in Imperial China. Discussions under the Jurchen-Chin Dynasty (1115–1234) (Seattle–London).Google Scholar
Chang, Hsing-t'ang, Shih Chi Han Shu Hsiung-nu ti-ming chin-shih. Taipei, 1963.Google Scholar
Chang, Wei-hua, Lun Han Wu-ti, Shanghai, 1957.Google Scholar
Chang, Kwang-chih, 1963, Archaeology of Ancient China (New Haven and London).Google Scholar
Charanis, P. 1953, “On the Slavic Settlement in the Peloponnesus,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 46, pp. 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chard, C. S. 1958a, “An Outline of the Prehistory of Siberia. Pt. I. The Pre-Metal Periods,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chard, C. S. 1958b, “The Oldest Sites of Northeastern Siberia,” American Antiquity 21, No. 4.Google Scholar
Chavannes, E., 1907, “Les pays d'Occident d'après le Heou Han Chou,” T'oung Pao 6, pp. 149–234.Google Scholar
Chavannes, E., Documents sur les Tou-kiue, (Turcs,) Occidentaux (St. Petersbourg, 1903).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, Documents sur les Tou-kiue (Turcs) Occidentaux, recueillis et commentés suivi de Notes Additionnelles (Sbornik trudov Orkhonskoǐ ekspedicii, vi, Sanktpeterburg, 1903.Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, T'oung Pao, series ii, 4, 1904, both reprinted as one volume: Paris, 1941).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, 1903, Documents sur les Tou-kiue (Turcs) Occidentaux, (St. Pétersbourg). (Reprint 1941?).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, 1904, “Notes additionnelles sur les Tou-kiue (Turcs) Occidentaux”, T'oung Pao. 5, pp. 1–110. (Reprinted in the reprint of the Documents).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, 1905, “Jinagupta, (528–605 après J.C.),” T'oung Pao 6, pp. 332–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, 1912, “Epitaphes de deux princesses turques des T'ang,” Festschrift V. Thomsen, pp. 78–87 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, Documents sur les Tou-kiue (Turcs) Occidentaux, (St. Petersbourg, 1903).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard and Pelliot, Paul, “Un traité manichéen retrouvé en Chine,” Journal asiatique 10.18: 499–617 (1911), 11.1: 99–199, 261–394 (1913).Google Scholar
Chavannes, Edouard, 1897–8, “Voyageurs chinois chez les Khitans et les Joutchen,” Journal asiatique 1897, I, pp. 377–422, 1898, I, pp. 361–439.Google Scholar
Cheng, Ch'in-jen, “Hsiung-nu,” Hsin Shih-tai, vol. 9, No. 4 (1969).Google Scholar
Cheng, T'e-kun, 1973, “The Beginning of Chinese Civilization,” Antiquity 47, pp. 197–209.Google Scholar
Chernecov, V. N. 1953, Drevnjaja istorija Nizhnego Priob'ja, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 35.
Chernenko, E. V., 1968, Skifskii dospekh [Scythian armor] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Chernenko, E. V., 1981, Skifskie luchniki [Scythian archers] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Chernikov, S. S., 1949, Drevnjaja metallurgija i gornoe delo Zapadnogo Altaja (Alma-Ata).Google Scholar
Chernikov, S. S., 1960, Vostochnoj Kazakhstan v êpokhu bronzy, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 88.
Chin, Kuang-p'ing and Ch'i-ts'ung, Chin, 1980, Nü-chen yü-yen wen-tzu yen-chiu, [A Study of the Jurchen Language and Script] (Peking).Google Scholar
Chlenova, N. L., 1962, “Ob olennykh kamnjakh Mongolii i Sibiri,” Mongol'skij arkheologicheskij sbornik (edited by Kiselev, S. V.), (Moskva), pp. 27–35. [The same topic was studied more in detail by the same author in “Skifskij olen',” Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 115 (1962), pp. 167–203. See also Jacobson 1983].Google Scholar
Chlenova, N. L., 1964, “Karasukskaja kul'tura v Juzhnoj Sibiri,” in Drevnjaja Sibir (Ulan-Udê), pp. 263–78.Google Scholar
Chlenova, N. L., 1972, Khronologija pamjatnikov karasukskoj êpokhi (Moskva).Google Scholar
Chung-kuo, K'o-hsüeh Yüan K'ao-ku Yen-chiuSo,.Hsin Chung-kuo ti K'ao-ku Shou-huo, Peking, 1961.Google Scholar
Claudian, 1922, With an English translation by Platnauer, Maurice, I–II (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Clauson, G., “À propos du Manuscrit Pelliot Tibétain 1283,” Journal asiatique 245 (1957).Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard Sir, 1971, “Some Notes on the Inscription of Toñuquq,” Studia Turcica edited by Ligeti, L., pp. 125–32, (Budapest).Google Scholar
Codex Cumanicus in Faksimile herausgegeben, ed. Grønbech, Kaare (Monumenta Linguarum Asiae Maioris, 1, Kopenhagen, 1936).Google Scholar
Comnena, Anna: Anne Comnene, Alexiade, ed., trans. Leib, B., 3 vols. (Paris, 1937–45).Google Scholar
Comşa, M., 1972, “Directions et étapes de la pénétration des Slaves vers la Péninsule Balkanique aux VIe–VIIe siècles (avec un regard spécial sur le territoire de la Roumanies,” Balcanoslavica I, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Constantinus et Methodius Thessalonicenses, Fontes (Konstantin i Metodije Solunjani, Izvori), ed. Grivec, F., Tomšić, F. (Radovi Staroslavenskog Instituta, IV, Zagreb, 1960).Google Scholar
Coon, C. S., 1951, Cave Exploration in Iran 1949, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Croke, Brian, 1977, “Evidence for the Hun Invasion of Thrace in a.d. 422,” Greek, Roman, Byzantine Studies 18, pp. 347–68.Google Scholar
Croke, Brian, 1981, “Anatolius and Nomus: Envoys to Attila,” Byzantinoslavica 42, pp. 159–70.Google Scholar
Csallány, D., “Rovásirásos gyűrűk Magyarországon,” Archaeológiai Értesítő, 82 (1955).Google Scholar
Csallány, Dezső, 1956, Archäologische Denkmäler der Awarenzeit in Mitteleuropa (Budapest). A complete bibliography up to 1955. To be complemented by Kollautz, 1965.Google Scholar
Csallány, Dezsö, 1939, “Kora–avarkori sirleletek – Grabfunde der Frühawarenzeit,” Folia Archeologica 12, pp. 121–80.Google Scholar
Csallány, Dezsö, 1956, Archäologische Denkmäler der Awarenzeit in Mitteleuropa (Budapest). [A complete bibliography up to 1955. Complemented by Kollautz 1965, cited above, p. 000].Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., 1888, “Coins of the Indo-Scythian King Miaus or Heraus,” The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 8, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., 1889, “Coins of the Tochari, Kushans or Yue-ti,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 9, pp. 268–311.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., 1892, “Coins of the Kushanas or Great Yueti,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 12, pp. 40–82, 95–159.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., 1893, 1894, “Later Indo-Scythians,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 13, pp. 93–128, 166–202; 14, pp. 243–93.Google Scholar
Curiel, R. and Schlumberger, D., 1953 Trésors monétaires d'Afghanistan, Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Afghanistan 14.
Czebe, Gy., “Turco-byzantinische Miszellen, I. Konstantinos, De administrando Imperio 37. Kapitel über die Petschenegen,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum., i (1921–5) pp. 209–19.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1954, “Monographs on Syriac and Muhammadan Sources in the Literary Remains of M. Kmoskó,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 4, pp. 19–90.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1957, “The Syriac Legend Concerning Alexander the Great,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 7, pp. 231–49.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1971, “Pseudo-Zacharias Rhetor on the Nomads,” in Studia Turcica, edited by Ligeti, L., pp. 133–48. (Budapest).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1958, “Bahrām Čōbīn and the Persian Apocalyptic Literature,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 8, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1962, “Coγay-quzï, Qara-qum, Kök-öng,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1972, “On the Numerical Composition of the Ancient Turkish Tribal Confederation,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25, pp. 275–81.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1973, “Gardizi on the History of Central Asia (746–80 a.d.),” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 27, pp. 257–67.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1980, “Zur Geschichte der Hephtaliten,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 28, pp. 213–17.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., 1983, “From East to West: the Age of Nomadic Migrations in Eurasia,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, III, pp. 25–125. [Translated from Hungarian by Golden, P. B.].Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “A karluk törzsek nevei,” Magyar Nyelv 45 (1949), pp. 164–168.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “Kāšġarī földrajzi neveihez,” Bárczi Géza – Emlékkönyv, ed. Benkö, L. (Budapest, 1963).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, K., “Gardīzī on the History of Central Asia (745–780 a.d.),” Acta Orientalia Hungarica 27.3 (1973).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Magna Hungaria,” Századok, 75 (1943).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A magyarság Dél-Oroszországban” in Ligeti, L.(ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A IX századi magyar történelem föbb kérdései,” Magyar Nyelv, XLI (1945).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, IV–IX századi népmozgalmak a steppén (A Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Kiadványai, 84, Budapest, 1954).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, Hajdú, Péter (eds.), A magyar őstörténet kérdései Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 5, (Budapest, 1955).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Etimológia és filológia (Bulgár-török jövevényszavaink átvételének történeti hátteréről),” in Benkő, L., Sál, E. K. (eds.), Az etimológia elmélete és módszere (Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 89, Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, Egy bolgár török yiltavar méltóságnév,” Magyar Nyelv, XL (1944).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Egy kazár méltóságnév,” Magyar Nyelv, XLIII (1947).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A kunok eredetéről,” Magyar Nyelv, XLV (1949), pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A kazár kil-kel eredete,” Magyar Nyelv, XLIX (1953), pp. 175–8.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Herakleios török szövetségesei,” Magyar Nyelv, XLIX (1953), pp. 319–23.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Monographs on Syriac and Muhammadan Sources in the Literary Remains of M. Kmoskó”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 4 (1954) pp. 19–91.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Kaukázusi hunok, kaukázusi avarok”, Studia Antiqua Hungarica, 2 (1955) pp. 123–40.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Khazar Raids in Transcaucasia in a.d. 762–764,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 11 (1960) pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A korai kazár történelem forrásainak kritikájához,” A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia nyelv-és irodalomtudományi osztályának közleményei, 15 (1960) pp. 107–28.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Bemerkungen zur Geschichte der Chazaren,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 13 (1961) pp. 243–51.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “TEPMATZOγΣ,” Acta Antiqua Hungarica, 10 (1962).
Czeglédy, Károly, A nomád népek vándorlása napkelettől napnyugatig (Kőorösi Csoma Kiskönyvtár, 8, Budapest, 1969).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Pseudo-Zacharias Rhetor on the Nomads,” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), Studia Turcica (Budapest, 1971), pp. 133–48.Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Ogurok és türkök Kazáriában” in Bartha, A. et al. (eds.), Magyar őbstörténeti tanulmányok (Budapest, 1977).Google Scholar
Ḑbrowski, Krzysztof, Nagrodzka-Majchrzyk, Teresa, Tryjarski, Edward, Hunowie Europejscy, Protobułgarzy, Chazarowie, Pieczyngowie (Wroław-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdańsk, 1975).Google Scholar
Da̧browski, Krzysztof, Nagrodzka-Majchrzyk, Teresa, Tryjarski, Edward, Hunowie Europejscy Protobulgarzy, Chazarowie, Pieczyngowie (Wroław-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdańsk, 1975).Google Scholar
Daffinà, Paolo, 1982, “The Han shu Hsi yü chuan retranslated. A Review Article,” T'oung Pao, 68, pp. 309–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daffinà, Paolo, 1982, Il nomadismo centrasiatico, Parte prima, Istituto dell'India e dell'Asia Orientale, (Roma). The title does not reflect accurately the content of the book which is probably the best and most up-to-date presentation of Inner Asian history and civilization up the end of the Hsiung-nu period.Google Scholar
Daffinà, Paolo, 1985, “La Persia sassanide secondo le fonti cinese,” Rivista degli Studi Orientali, 57, pp. 121–70.Google Scholar
Dauvillier, Jean, “Les provinces chaldéennes ‘de l'extérieur’ au moyen âge,” Mélanges offerts au R.P. Ferdinand Cavallera (Toulouse, 1948), pp. 261–316.Google Scholar
Davidovič, E. A., “Numizmatičeskie materialy dlja khronologii i genealogii sredneaziatskikh Karakhanidov,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo Muzeja, 26, Numizmatičeskiĭ sbornik, pt. 2 (1957).Google Scholar
Dawson, Christopher (editor), 1966, The Mongol Mission, Harper Torchbook (1966).Google Scholar
De Crespigny, R., 1984, Northern Frontier. The Policies and Strategy of the Later Han Empire, Faculty of Asian Studies Monographs, New Series. 4 (Canberra).Google Scholar
de Vajay, Sz., Der Eintritt des ungarischen Stämmebundes in die europäischen Geschichte (München, 1968).Google Scholar
Debec, G. F., 1948, Paleoantropologija SSSR, Trudy Instituta êtnografii AN SSSR, Novaja serija iv..Google Scholar
Debec, G. F., 1956, “Problema proiskhozhdenija kirgizskogo naroda v svete antropologicheskikh dannykh,” Trudy kirgizskoj arkheologo-êtnograficheskoj êkspedicii 1, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Décsy, Gyula, Einführung in die Finnisch-Ugrische Sprachwissenschaft (Wiesbaden, 1965).Google Scholar
Deér, Joseph, 1965, “Karl der Grosse und der Untergang des Awarenreiches” in Karl der Grosse, herausgegeben von Braunfels, W., vol. 1, pp. 719–91 (Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
Deér, József, Pogány magyarság keresztény magyarság (Budapest, 1938).Google Scholar
Deguignes, , 1756–8, Histoire générale des Huns, des Turcs, des Mongols et des autres Tartares occidentaux … avant et depuis Jésus-Christ, jusqu'à présent, i–iv (in 5 volumes), (Paris).Google Scholar
Demiéville, Paul, 1952, Le concile de Lhasa. Une controverse sur le quiétisme entre bouddhistes de l'lnde et de la Chine au Vllle siècle de l'ère chrétienne, Bibliothèque de l'Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, Vol. VII (Paris).Google Scholar
Denis, Sinor, Introduction à l'étude de l'Eurasie Centrale (Wiesbaden 1963), pp. 210–15.Google Scholar
Denis, Sinor, Introduction à l'étude de l'Eurasie Centrale (Wiesbaden 1963), pp. 261–5.Google Scholar
Derevjanko, A. P., 1970a, Gromatukhskaja kul'tura, In: Sibir i ee sosedi v drevnosti (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Derevjanko, A. P., 1969, “The Novopetrovka Blade Culture on the Middle Amur,” Arctic Anthropology, No. 1, pp. 119–127.Google Scholar
Derevjanko, A. P., 1970b, Novopetrovskaja kul'tura Srednego Amura (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Derevjanko, A.P.–Okladnikov A.P., 1969, “Drevnie kul'tury vostochnykh rajonov MNP (k itogam arkheologicheskikh issledovanij 1949 i 1967 gg.),” Sovetskaja Arkheologija 1969, 4, pp. 141–56.Google Scholar
Derevjanko, E. I., 1975, Mokhêskie pamjatniki Srednego Priamur' ja (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Desmaisons, P. I., Histoire des Mogols et des Tatares par Aboul-Ghazi Béhadour Khan (St. Pétersbourg, 1871–4, reprint Amsterdam, 1970).Google Scholar
Dexippi, Eunapii, Petri Patricii, Prisci, Malchi, Menandri historiarum quae supersunt, ed. Bekker, I., Niebuhr, B. G. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1829).Google Scholar
Dexippi, Eunapii, Petri Patricii, Prisci, Malchi, Menandri historiarum quae supersunt, ed. Bekker, I., Niebuhr, B. G. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1829).Google Scholar
Diaconu, P., Les Petchenègues au Bas-Danube (Bibliotheca Historica Romaniae, 27, Bucarest 1970).Google Scholar
Diakonoff, I. M. 1981, “The Cimmerians,” Acta Iranica, 2nd Series, vol. vii, pp. 103–40. [Very important].Google Scholar
Dienes, István, The Hungarians Cross the Carpathians, trans. Balogh, B. (Budapest, 1972).Google Scholar
Dikov, N. N., 1958, Bronzovyj vek Zabajkal'ja (Ulan-Udê).Google Scholar
Dikov, N. N., 1964, “Kamennyj vek Kamchatki i Chukotki v svete novejshikh arkheologicheskikh dannykh,” in Istorija i kul'tura narodov severo-vostoka SSSR (Magadan).Google Scholar
Dikov, N. N., [There is an English version: “The Stone Age of Kamchatka and the Chukchi Peninsula in the Light of New Archaeological Data,” Arctic Anthropology (1965), 3, No. 1, pp. 10–25].Google Scholar
Dikov, N. N., 1977, Arkheologicheskie pamjatniki Kamchatki, Chukotki i Verkhnej Kolymy. Azija na styke s Amerikoj v drevnosti (Moskva). [With English table of contents].Google Scholar
Dikov, N. N., 1979, Drevnie kul'tury Severo Vostochnoj Azii (Moskva). [Continuation of Dikov 1977, with English table of contents].Google Scholar
Doblhofer, E., 1955, Byzantinische Diplomaten und östliche Barbaren. Aus den Excerpta de legationibus des Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos ausgewählte Abschnitte des Priskos und Menander Protektor (Graz).Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, 1973, “Zur Sprache der Hunnen,” Central Asiatic Journal pp. 1–50. [Cf. on the same topic Pritsak 1982].Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, 1962, “Zur Bezeichnung der Westtürken”, Central Asiatic Journal 7, pp. 256–63.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, 1969, “Altaische Scholien zu Herbert Frankes Artikel,” Zentralasiatische Studien 3, pp. 45–9.Google Scholar
Dolgikh, B. O., 1960, Rodovoj i plemennoj sostav narodov Sibiri v XVII v., Trudy Instituta vostokovedenija. 55.Google Scholar
Dovatur, A. I.Kallistov, D. P.Shisova, I. A., 1982, Narody nashej strany v “Istorii” Gerodota [The peoples of our land in the “Histories” of Herodotus] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Dowsett, C.J.F. [translator], 1961, The History of the Caucasian Albanians by Mvsès Dasxurançi (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dubs, H. H., 1938–55, The History of the Former Han Dynasty. A Critical Translation with Annotations, (Baltimore, Md.).Google Scholar
Ducellier, A., “Les sources byzantines et l'apparition des Hongrois en Europe,” Études Finno-Ougriennes, I (1964).Google Scholar
Dujčev, Ivan, 1976, Cronaca di Monemvasia (Palermo). [An important work concerning the penetration of the Avars and Slavs into Hellas].Google Scholar
Dunlop, D. M., 1957, The History of the Jewish Khazars (Princeton).Google Scholar
Dunlop, Douglas M., The History of the Jewish Khazars (Princeton, 1954).Google Scholar
Džanašvili, M., “Izvestija gruzinskikh letopiseĭ i istorikov o severnom Kavkaze i Rossii,” Sbornik Materialov dlja Opisanija Mestnosteĭ i Piemen Kavkaza, 22 (1897).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1942a, Kultur und Siedlung der Randvölker Chinas, (Leiden). Still very important.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1942b, Lokalkulturen im alten China, (Leiden).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1949, Das Toba-Reich Nordchinas, (Leiden).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1965, Conquerors and Rulers. Social Forces in Medieval China, 2nd, revised edition, (Leiden).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1978, China und seine westlichen Nachbarn. Beiträge zur mittelalterlichen und neueren Geschichte Zentralasiens, (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1942, Kultur und Siedlung der Kandvölker Chinas, T'oung Pao, supplément au vol. 36 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Eberhard, W., 1942, 1942–3, “Die Kultur der alten zentral- und west-asiatischen Völker nach chinesischen Quellen,” Zeitschrift f¨r Ethnologie 73 pp. 215–75.Google Scholar
Ecsedy, H. 1965, “Old Turkic Titles of Chinese Origin,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 18, pp. 83–91.Google Scholar
Ecsedy, H. 1972, “Tribe and Tribal Society in the 6th Century Turk Empire,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25, pp. 245–62.Google Scholar
Ecsedy, H. 1977, “Tribe and Empire, Tribe and Society in the Turk Age,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Ecsedy, Hilda, “Old Turkic titles of Chinese origin,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 18: 83–91 (1965).Google Scholar
Egami, Namio, Kita Ajiya Shi, Tokyo, 1956.Google Scholar
Eisner, J., 1952, Devinske Nová Ves (Bratislava).Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1955, “The Origin of the White Huns or Hephtalites,” East and West 6, pp. 231–7.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1959, “On the Nationality of the Ephtalites,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 18, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1963, “The Location of the Capital of Lou-Ian and the Date of KharoṣṬhī Inscriptions,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko. 22, pp. 125–171.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1965, “On Sino-KharoṣṬhī Coins,” East and West, 15, pp. 231–276.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1968, “Hsieh, Fu-wang or Wang of the Yüeh-shih,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 26, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1970, “On the Date of the Kidarites (2),” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko. 28, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Enoki, Kazuo, 1969, “On the Date of the Kidarites (1),” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 27, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, 1982, Az avarság és kelet a régészeti források tükrében (Budapest). [Russian summary].Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Bol'šaja Vengrija,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 13 (1961).Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Teorii vengerskikh učenykh o povolžskom proiskhoždenii drevnikh vengrov,” Arkheologija i Etnografija Baškirii, 4 (1971).Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Fouilles archéologiques en Bachkirie et la préhistoire hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 25 (1972), 301–12.Google Scholar
Eremeev, D. E., Êtnogenez Tjurok (Moskva, 1971).Google Scholar
Eremjan, S. T., “Juriĭ Bogoljubskiĭ po armjanskim i gruzinskim istočnikam,” Naučnye Trudy Erevanskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta 23. (1946).Google Scholar
Esin, E., “Ṭabarīʾs Report on the Warfare with the Türgiš and the Testimony of Eighth Century Central Asian Art,” Central Asiatic Journal 17.2–4 (1973).Google Scholar
Fan, Yeh, Hou Han Shu, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Novye fakty iz istorii Karakhanidov pervoĭ četverti XI v. v svete numizmatičeskikh dannykh,” Iz Istorii Kul'tury Narodov Uzbekistana (Tashkent, 1965).Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Očerk istorii Karakhanidov vtori četverti XI v. (po numizmatičeskim dannym),” Istorija Material' noj Kul'tury Uzbekistana 7 (1966).Google Scholar
Fedorov, M. N., “Ferganskiĭ klad karakhanidskikh dirkhemov 1034–1043 gg.,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija (1968), No. 3.Google Scholar
Fedoseeva, S. A., 1968, Drevnie kul'tury verkhnogo Viljuja (Moskva).Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. R., Istoričeskie svjazi čuvašskogo jazyka s jazykami finno-ugrov Povolž'ja i Pecmi, C̆uvašsko-mariĭskie jazykovve svjazi, pt. 1 (C̆eboksary, 1965).Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. R., Istoričeskie svjazi C̆uvašskogo s volžskimi i permskimi finno-ugroskimi i jazykami (C̆eboksary, 1968).Google Scholar
Fehér, Géza, A bolgár-törökök szerepe és műveltsége (Budapest, 1940).Google Scholar
Fehér, Géza, “Zur Geschichte der Steppenvölker von Südrussland 9–10 Jhr.,” Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 5 (1959).Google Scholar
Ferrari, Alfonsa, 1958, Mk'yen brtse's Guide to the Holy Places of Central Tibet, completed and edited by Luciano Petech, with the collaboration of Hugh Richardson, Serie Orientale Roma xvi (Rome).Google Scholar
Fodor, István, “K voprosu o pogrebal'nom obrjade drevnikh vengrov,” Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Fodor, István, Verecke híres útján … (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Francke, A. H., 1926, “Antiquities of Indian Tibet,” Archaeological Survey of India, New Imperial Series, Vol. L, II (Calcutta).Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1969, “Bemerkungen zu den sprachlichen Verhä ltnissen im Liao-Reich,” Zentralasiatische Studien 3, pp. 7–43.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1974, “A Note on Wine,” Zentralasiatische Studien 8, pp. 241–5.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1975, “Chinese Texts on the Jurchen. I. A Translation of the Jurchen Monograph in the San-ch'ao pei-meng hui-pien,” Zentralasiatische Studien 9, pp. 119–86.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1978a, “Chinese Texts on the Jurchen. II. A Translation of Chapter One of the Chin-shi,” Zentralasiatische Studien 12, pp. 413–52.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1978b, Nordchina am Vorabend der mongolischen Eroberungen: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft unter der Chin-Dynastie (1115–1234), Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vorträge G 228 (Opladen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1979, “Some Folkloristic Data in the Dynastic History of the Chin (115–1234),” in Legend, Lore and Religion in China. Essays in Honor of Wolfram Eberhard on his Seventieth Birthday, edited by Allan, Sarah and Cohen, Alvin P., pp. 135–53 (San Francisco).Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1981, “Jurchen Customary Law and Chinese Law of the Chin Dynasty”, in State and Law in East Asia, edited by Eikemeier, Dieter and Franke, Herbert, pp. 215–233 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1982, “Randnotizen zu einigen Worten der Khitansprache im Lichte neuerer Arbeiten,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36, pp. 173–82.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, 1985, “Fremdherrschaften in China und ihr Einfluss auf die staatlichen Institutionen (10–14 Jahrhundert),” Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 122, No. 3 pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Franke, O., 1936–7, Geschichte des Chinesischen Reiches, Vols. 2 and 3 (Berlin/Leipzig).Google Scholar
Franke, Otto, 1948, 1952, Geschichte des chinesischen Reiches, vols. 4 and 5 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Fritze, W. H., 1963, 1965, 1967, “Slaven und Awaren im angelsächsischen Missionsprogramm,” Zeitschrift für Slavische Pbilologie 31, pp. 316–38; 32, pp. 231–51; 33, pp. 358–72.Google Scholar
Fritze, W. H., 1979, “Zur Bedeutung der Awaren für die slawische Ausdehnungsbewegung im frühen Mittelalter,” Zeitschrift für Ostforschung 28, pp. 498–545.Google Scholar
Frumkin, Grégoire, 1970, Archaeology in Soviet Central Asia (Leiden, Brill). [Only some parts relevant to this chapter].Google Scholar
Frye, R. N., 1966, The Heritage of Persia (New York).Google Scholar
Frye, R. N., The Golden Age of Persia. The Arabs in the East (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Fülöp, Gy., 1978, “La survivance des Avars au IXe siècle,” Alba Regia, 16, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. von, 1950, “Steppe und Stadt im Leben der ältesten Türken,” Der Islam, 29, pp. 30–62.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. von, 1953, “Inhalt und magische Bedeutung der alttürkischen Inschriften,” Anthropos, PP. 537–55.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. v., 1973, Das Leben im uigurischen Königreich von Qočo (850–1250), I–II, Veröffentlichungen der Societas Ural-Altaica, Bd.6, (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Gabain, Annemarie von, “Steppe und Stadt im Leben der ältesten Türken,” Der Islam 29: 30–62 (1949).Google Scholar
Gafurov, B. G., Litvinskiĭ, B. A., Istorija tadžikskogo naroda, 3 vols. (Moskva, 1963–5).Google Scholar
Gafurov, B. G., Tadžiki (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Galanina, L. K., 1980, Kurdzhipskij kurgan [The Kurkzhipsk Kurgan] (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Bartol'd, V. V., “Izvlečenie iz sočinenija Gardizi Zain al-Akhbār” in Bartol'd, V. V., Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–73), VIII.Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Zain al-Akhbār (“Adornment of Information”), excerpts in: V.V., Bartol'd, “Izvlečenie iz Sočinenija Gardizi Zaĭn al-Akhbar,” in Akademik V. V. Bartol'd, Sočinenija, 9 vols. (Moskva, 1963–73), vol. 8.Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Zain al-Akhbār, ed. Nāzim, M. (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar
Gardner, Percy 1886, The Coins of the Greek and Scythic Kings of Bactria and India in the British Museum (London). Reprinted: Chicago 1966.Google Scholar
Garipov, T. M., Kuzeev, R. G., “Baškiro-Mad'jarskaja problema,” Arkheologija i Etnografija I (1962).Google Scholar
Garkavi, A. Ja., Skazanija musul'manskikh pisateleǐ o slavjanakh i russkikh (Sanktpeterburg, 1870).Google Scholar
Garkavi, A. Ja., Skazanija evreĭskikh pisateleĭ o khozarakh i Khozarskom carstve (Sanktpeterburg, 1874).Google Scholar
Garrod, D. A.Bate, D. M., 1937, The Stone Age of Mount Carmel (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gening, V. F., Khalikov, A. Kh., “Etnogenez udmurtov po dannym arkheologii,” Voprosy finno-ugorskovo jazykoznanija IV (1967).Google Scholar
Gening, V. F., Khalikov, A. Kh., Rannie bolgary na Volge (Moskva, 1964).Google Scholar
Georgios Monakhos, : Georgii Monachi chronicon, ed. Boor, Carl, I–II (Leipzig, 1904).Google Scholar
Gerasimov, M. M., 1958, “Mal'ta, paleoliticheskaja Mal'ta (raskopki 1956–1957 gg.),” Sovetskaja Êtnografija. 1958, 3.Google Scholar
Gerevich, L.Erdélyi, I.Salamon, A.. (editors), 1972, Les questions fondamentales du peuplement du bassin des Carpathes du VIIIe au Xe siècle (Budapest).Google Scholar
Geschichte Mittelasiens, 1966, Orientalistik, Handbuch, Abteilung, Erste, Band, Fünfter, Abschnitt, Fünfter, (Leiden). Cf. Haussig 1966, Jettmar 1966, Petech 1966, Spuler 1966.Google Scholar
Ghévond, , Histoire des guerres et des conquêtes des Arabes en Arménie, trans. Chahnazarian, V. (Paris, 1856).Google Scholar
Gibert, Lucien, 1934, Dictionnaire historique et géographique de la Mandchourie (Hong Kong).Google Scholar
Ginagi, Kh.G (ed.), Istorija Tatarskoĭ ASSR, 2 vols (Kazan', 1955–60).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Norton (editor), 1958, The Pattern of Asia (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).Google Scholar
Girshman, R., 1946, Begram. Recherches archéologiques et historiques sur les Kouchans. Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Françhise en Afghanistan 12 (Cairo).Google Scholar
Gjuzelev, B.Knjaz Boris Pŭrvi. Bŭlgari prez vtorata polovina na IX vek (Sofija, 1969).Google Scholar
Göbl, Robert, 1967, Dokumente zur Geschichte der iranischen Hunnen in Baktrien undlndien, i–iii (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Göckenjan, H., Hilfsvölker und Grenzwächter im mittelalterlichen Ungarn (Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte des östlichen Europa, V, Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
Golb, Norman, Pritsak, Omeljan, Khazarian Hebrew Documents of the Tenth Century (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
Golden, P. B., “The Migrations of the Oǧuz,” Archivum Ottomanicum, 4 (1972).Google Scholar
Golden, P. B., “Imperial Ideology and the Sources of Political Unity Amongst the Pre-Činggisid Nomads of Western Eurasia,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 2 (1976).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The People,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The Q'azaro-Hungarian Title Personal Name Ἰέεχ,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “Hazar Dili” (“The Khazar Language”), Türk Dili Arastirmalari Yilligt Belleten. (1971).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The Migrations of the Oǧuz,” Archivum Ottomanicum, 4 (1972), pp. 45–84.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The Question of the Rus' Qaǧanate,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 2 (1982) pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “Imperial Ideology and the Sources of Political Unity Amongst the Pre-Činggisid Nomads of Western Eurasia,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 2 (1976).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., Khazar Studies. An historico-philological inquiry into the origins of the Khazars (Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica xxv, Budapest, 1980).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “Khazaria and Judaism”, Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 3 (1983), pp. 127–56.Google Scholar
Golubovskiĭ, P., Pečenegi, Torki i polovcy do našestvija tatar. Istorija južno- russkikh stepeĭ IX – XIII VV. (Kiev, 1884).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, “Die Bulgarisch-Türkischen Lehnwörter in der ungarischen Sprache,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne., 30 (1912).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, “Árpádkori török személy neveink,” Magyar Nyelv, XI (1915).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, Honfoglalás előtti bolgártörök jövevényszavaink, ed. Ligeti, L. (Budapest, 1960).Google Scholar
Gordon, C. D., 1960, The Age of Attila. Fifth Century Byzantium and the Barbarians (Ann Arbor, Michigan).Google Scholar
Grafenauer, B., 1950, “Quelques problèmes relatifs à l'époque des Slaves du Sud,” Zgodovinski Casopis 4, pp. 23–126. [In Slovenian with a French summary].Google Scholar
Grakov, B. N., 1947, “Perezhitki matriarkhata u sarmatov” [Survivals of matriarchate among the Sarmatians] VDI, 3.Google Scholar
Grakov, B. N., 1954, Kemenskoe gorodishche na Dnepre, [The Kamenskoe Gorodishche on the Dnieper], Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR, 36.
Grakov, B. N., 1971, Skify [The Scythians] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Gregory, of Tours, Historica Francorum, edited by Krusch, B., Levison, W., Monumenta Germaniae Historica. SSRM. 1937–51 (Hannover).Google Scholar
Grekov, B. A., Čerepnin, L. V., Pašuto, V. T., Očerki istorii. SSSR: period feodalizma IX – XV vv. (Moskva, 1953).Google Scholar
Grekov, Boris D., “Volžskie bolgary v ix–x vv.,” Istoričeskie Zapiski 14 (1945).Google Scholar
Grenard, F., “La légende de Satok Boghra Khan et l'histoire,” Journal asiatique 1900, I, pp. 5–79.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B., 1960, “Some Prehistoric Connections Between Siberia and America,” Science 131, pp. 801–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorev, A. A. and Budyko, M. I., 1960, “Classification of the Climates of the U.S.S.R.,” Soviet Geography 1, pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigor'ev, V. V., Rossija i Azija (Sanktpeterburg, 1876).Google Scholar
Grjaznov, M. P. 1929, “Bronzovyj kinzhal s ozera Kotokel',” Burjatievedenie 9–10 (Verkhneudinsk).Google Scholar
Grjaznov, M. P. 1952, “Pamjatniki karasukskogo êtapa v Central'nom Kazakhstane,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija. 1952, 12.Google Scholar
Grjaznov, M. P. 1956, Istorija drevnykh piemen Verkhnej Obi, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 48.
Grjaznov, M. P. 1961, Drevnjaja bronza minusinskikh stepej, Trudy otdela istorii pervobytnoj kul'tury Gos. Ermitazha, 1 (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Grjaznov, M. P.Shnejder, E. R., 1929, “Drevnie izvajanija minusinskikh stepej,” Materialy po Etnografii, torn 4, vyp. 2.Google Scholar
Grønbech, Kaare, Komanisches Wörterbuch (Monumenta Linguarum Asiae Maioris, Subsidia, 1, København, 1942).Google Scholar
Grousset, René, 1939, L'Empire des Steppes, 1939.Google Scholar
Grousset, René, The English translation by Walford, Naomi, The Empire of the Steppes. A History of Central Asia, 1970, (Rutgers University Press)Google Scholar
Grube, Wilhelm, 1896, Die Sprache und Schrift der Jučen (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Gruševskiĭ (Gruševs'kiĭ), M.Očerki istorii Kievskoĭ zemli ot smerti Jaroslava do konca XIV st. (Kiev, 1891).Google Scholar
Guliamov, Ia. G., Tolstov, S. P. et al., Istorija Uzbekskoj SSR, vol. I (Tashkent, 1967).Google Scholar
Guljamov, Ja. G.Islamov, C.Askarov, A., 1966, Pervobytnaja kul'tura i vozniknovenie oroshaemogo zemledelija v nizov'jakh Zaravshana (Tashkent).Google Scholar
Gumilev, L. N.Otkrytie Khazarii (Moskva, 1966).Google Scholar
Gumilëv, L. N., Drevnie Tjurki (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Gumilëv, L. N., Poiski vymyšlennogo carstva, (Moskva, 1970).Google Scholar
Gyárfás, István, A jász-kúnok története, 4 vols. (Kecskemét–Szolnok–Budapest, 1870–85).Google Scholar
Gyóni, M., “Kalizok, kazárok, kabarok, magyarok,” Magyar Nyelv XXXIV (1938).Google Scholar
Gyóni, M., Magyarország és a magyarság a bizánci források tükrében, (Magyar–Görög Tanulmányok–Oὐγγρọεккηṿιкαὶ Mελέται, 24, Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Györffy, Gy. (ed.), A magyarok elődeiről és a honfoglalásról (Budapest, 1958).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Besenyők és magyarok,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum. Supplement vol. 1 (1939) PP. 397–500.Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, Tanulmányok a magyar állam eredetéről (Budapest, 1959).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Magyarország népessége a honfoglalástól a XIV sz. közepéig” in Kovacsics, J. (ed.), Magyarország történeti demográfiája (Budapest, 1963).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Système des résidences d'hiver et d'été chez les nomades et les chefs hongrois du Xe siècle,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, Autour de l'état des semi-nomades: le cas de la Hongrie Studia Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 95, Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Györffy, György, “Besenyők és magyarok,” Kőrösi Csotna Archivum, I, Supplement vol. I (1939), pp. 397–500.Google Scholar
Györffy, György, “Monuments du lexique petchénègue”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 18 (1965).Google Scholar
Györffy, György, “Sur la question de l'établissement des Petchénègues en Europe,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 25 (1971).Google Scholar
Györffy, György, “Système des résidences d'hiver et d'été chez les nomades et les chefs hongrois du Xe siècle,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, I (1975).Google Scholar
Haarh, Erik, 1969a, “The Identity of Tsu-chi-chien, the Tibetan ‘king’ who died in 804 A.D.,Acta Orientalia, 25, pp. 121–70.Google Scholar
Haarh, Erik, 1969b, The Yar-lun Dynasty, A study with particular regard to the contribution by myths and legends to the history of Ancient Tibet and the origin and nature of its kings (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, “K etnogenezu vengerskogo naroda,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2 (1952).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, A magyarság kialakulásának előzményei. Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 2; (Budapest, 1953).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Finnugor népek és nyelvek (Budapest, 1962).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Eng. trans.: Finno-Ugrian Languages and Peoples, trans. Cushing, G. F. (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, “Finnougrische Urheimatforschung,” UA. 41 (1969), 252–64.Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Bevezetés az uráli nyelvtudományba (Budapest, 1966).Google Scholar
Halasi-Kun, Tibor, “A magyarság kaukázusi története” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Halasi-Kun, Tibor, “Kipchak Philology and the Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian, I,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1, (1975).Google Scholar
Halasi-Kun, Tibor, “Orta Kipcakca q-, k- ˜ O meselesi” (“The Problem of Middle Kipchak q-, k ˜ O”)Türk. Dili ve Tarihi Hakkmda Araş,tirmalar, ed. Eren, H., Halasi-Kun, T. (Ankara, 1950), 1.Google Scholar
Haloun, Gustav, 1937, “Zur Üse-Ḥsi Frage,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 91, pp.243–318.Google Scholar
Hambly, Gavin, editor, 1966, Zentralasien, Fischer Weltgeschichte, Band 16.Google Scholar
Hambly, Gavin, editor, There is an English version: 1969, Central Asia, Delacorte World History, volume xvi, (New York).Google Scholar
Hamilton, F. J.Brooks, E. G., 1899, The Syriac Chronicle of Zachariah of Mitylene (London).Google Scholar
Hamilton, James, 1962, “Toquz-oγuz et On-uyγur,” Journal asiatique, pp. 23–63.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James, 1972, “Le nom de lieu k.č.n, dans les inscriptions turques runiformes,” T'oung Pao 60, pp. 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James Russell, Les Ouīghours à l'époque des Cinq Dynasties, d'après les documents chinois (Bibliothèque de l'Institut des Hautes Études Chinoises, vol. 10; Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
Hamilton, James, “Toquz-Oγuz et On-Uyγur,” Journal asiatique 250: 23–63 (1962).Google Scholar
Hampl, F. 1964, “Neue awarenzeitliche Funde aus Niederösterreich,” Archaeologia Austriaca 35, pp. 66–86.Google Scholar
Han shu, [History of the (Former) Han], compiled by Ku, Pan [A.D. 32–92], yao, Ssu-pu pei edition, vols. 49–52 (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
Haneda, Tōru, Haneda hakushi shigaku rombunshū (The collected historical writings of Dr Haneda), 2 vols. (Kyoto, 1957–8).Google Scholar
Hannestad, K., 1955–7, “Les relations de Byzance avec la Transcaucasie et l'Asie Centrale aux 5e et 6e siè;cles,” Byzantion, 25–7, pp. 421–56.Google Scholar
Hansen, Olaf, “Zur soghdischen Inschrift auf dem dreisprachigen Denkmal von Karabalgasun,” Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne, 44.3: 1–39 (1930).Google Scholar
Harmatta, J. 1971, “Eine neue Quelle zur Geschichte der Seidenstrasse,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2, pp. 125–43.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J. 1976, “L'apparition des Huns en Europe Orientale,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 24, pp. 277–83.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J., 1962, “Byzantinoturcica,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 10, pp. 131–50.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J., 1970, “Irán és Kina kapcsolatának történetéhez,” Antik Tanulmányok 17, pp. 232–61.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J., 1972, “Irano-Turcica,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, pp. 263–73.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J., 1982, “La médaille de Jeb Sahansah,” Studia Iranica II, pp. 167–80.Google Scholar
Harmatta, János, “The Dissolution of the Hun Empire”, Acta Archaeologica Hungarica, 2 (1952).Google Scholar
Harshakhī, , Ta'rīkh-i Bukhārā: The History of Bukhara, trans. Frye, R. N. (The Medieval Academy of America, Publication No. 61, Cambridge, Mass., 1954).Google Scholar
Hartmann, , Geschichte Italiens im Mittelalter, 1900, 1903, II, I, II, 2 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Haussig, H. W., 1956, “Die Quellen über die zentralasiatischen Herkunft der europäischen Awaren,” Central Asiatic Journal 2, pp. 2–43.Google Scholar
Haussig, H. W.Theophylakts Exkurs über die Skythischen Völker,” Byzantion, 23 (1953).Google Scholar
Haussig, Hans Wilhelm, 1966Awaren, Shuan-shuan und Hephthaliten,” in Geschichte Mittelasiens, pp. 106–23.Google Scholar
Haussig, Hans Wilhelm, 1983, Die Geschichte Zentralasiens und der Seidenstrasse in vorislamischer Zeit, (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Haussig, Hans-Wilhelm, 1977Das Problem der Herkunft der Hunnen,” Materialia Turcica 3, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Henning, W. B., 1948, “The Date of the Sogdian Ancient Letters,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12, pp. 601–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, W., “Neue Materialien zur Geschichte des Manichäismus,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, n.F.15: 1–18 (1936).Google Scholar
Henning, W. B., 1938, “Argi and the ‘Tokharians’,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 9, pp. 545–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, W. B., 1939, “The Great Inscription of Šāpūr I,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies. 9, pp. 823–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, W. B., 1960, “The Bactrian Inscription,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23, pp. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, W. B., 1965, “Surkh-Kotal und Kaniṣka,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 115, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
Henning, W. B., “A Farewell to the Khaghan of the Aq-Aqatärān,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14 (1952), pp. 501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, W. B., “Argi and the ‘Tokharians’,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 9: 545–71 (1937–9).Google Scholar
Herrmann, E., 1965, Slawisch-germanische Beziehungen im südostdeutschen Raum von der Spätantike bis zum Ungarnsturm. Ein Quellenbuch mit Erläuterungen (München).Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E., 1924, Paikuli. Monument and Inscription of the Early History of the Sasanian Empire, Kunst, Forschungen zur Islamischen, vol. iv (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hino, Kaizaburō, “Tōdai no Kaikotsusen” (Hui-ho ch'ien in the time of the T'ang dynasty), Tōhōgaku, 30: 38–49 (1965).Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-ti, 1970, “An Estimation of the Total Population of Sung–Chin China,” Etudes Song In Memoriam Étienne Balázs, Ser. I (Histoire et institutions), No. I, pp. 35–53 (Paris).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H., “Die Qarluq in der tibetischen Literatur,” Oriens, 3 (1950) pp. 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Helmut, 1950, Quellen zur Geschichte der tibetischen Bon-Religion, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jahrgang 1950, Nr. 4 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Helmut, 1967, “Žaṅ-žuṅ: the Holy Language of the Tibetan Bonpo,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 117, pp. 376–81.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Helmut, 1971, “The Tibetan Names of the Saka and the Sogdians,” Asiatische Studien 25, pp. 440–55.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Helmut, 1972, Tibet. A Handbook, Indiana University Oriental Series, vol. 5 (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar
Homeyer, H., 1951, Attila der Hunnenkönig von seinen Zeitgenossen dargestellt (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hooson, David, 1966, The Soviet Union: People and Regions (Belmont, CA.).Google Scholar
Horedt, K., 1958, “Das archäologische Fundgut Siebenbürgens von 450–650 u. Ztr.,” in Untersuchungen zur Frühgeschichte Siebenbürgens, pp. 87–111 (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Horedt, K., 1968, “Das Awarenproblem in Rumänien,” Študijné Zvesti Archeologického Ustavu Slovenskoj Akadémie Vied 16, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
Horedt, K., 1975, “The Gepidae, the Avars and the Romanic Population in Transylvania,” in: Relations Between the Autochtonous Population and the Migratory Populations on the Territory of Romania edited by Constantinescu, M. et al., pp. 111–22 (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Hou Han shu, [History of the Later Han], compiled by Yeh, Fan [A.D. 398–446], pei-yao, Ssu-pu edition, vols. 53–5 (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even, 1974, “The Relationship between the two Orkhon Inscriptions,” Acta Orientalia, 36, pp. 55–82.Google Scholar
Hrbek, I., “Ein arabischer Bericht über Ungarn (Abū Ḥāmid al-Andalūsī al-Ġarnāṭī 1080–1170),” Acta Orientalia Hungarica, 5 (1955).Google Scholar
Hruševs'kiĭ, M., Istorija Ukraïni-Rusi 10 vols. (L'viv–Kiiv, 1903–37, reprint New York, 1954–8).Google Scholar
Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu tsung-chiao hsinyang chi ch'i liu-pien,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yü-yen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 42, Part 4 (1971).Google Scholar
Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu she-hui tsu-chih tè ch'u-pu yen-chiu,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yü-yen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 40, Part 2 (1969).Google Scholar
Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu cheng-chih chih-tu tè yen-chiu,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yüyen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 41, Part 2 (1969).Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chiao-min, 1973, Atlas of China (New York).Google Scholar
Hsin T'ang shu [The New T'ang History], pei-yao, Ssu-ou edition (Shanghai 1936).Google Scholar
Hsüan-tsang, , (Ta T'ang) Hsi-yü chi [Record of the Western Region of the Great T'ang Dynasty], see: Zücher 1968, Watters 1904, Beal 1906.Google Scholar
Huang, Lin-shu, Ch'in Huang Ch'ang-ch'eng K'ao, revised edition, Hong Kong, 1972.Google Scholar
Hulsewé, A.F.P., 1979, China in Central Asia. The Early Stage: 125 B.C.–A.D. 23. An Annotated Translation of the Chapters 61 and 96 of the History of the Former Han Dynasty. With an Introduction by M.A.N. Loewe, Sinica Leidensia xiv.Google Scholar
Huntington, Ellsworth, 1917, Pulse of Asia (Boston).Google Scholar
Huszár, L., 1954–1955, “Das Münzmaterial in den Funden der Völkerwanderungszeit im Mittleren Donaubecken,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 5, pp. 61–109.Google Scholar
Ibn, Ḥawqal, Kitāb Ṣurat al-Arḍ: Opus Geographicum auctore Ibn Ḥauḳal “Liber Imaginis Terrae”, ed. Kramers, J. H. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, II2, Leiden, 1938–9), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Ibn, Ḥawqal, Kitāb Ṣūrat al-Arḍ, Kramers, J. H., 2 vols. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 2, Leiden, 1938–19392).Google Scholar
Ibn, al-Athīr, Al-Kāmil fīʾl-Ta'rīkh: Chronicon quod perfectissimum inscribitur, ed. Tornberg, C. J., 12 vols. (Leiden, 1851–76, reprint: Beirut, 1965–6).Google Scholar
Ibn, al-Faqīh, Kitāb al-Buldān (“The Book of the Lands”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Biblio-theca Geographorum Arabicorum, V, Leiden, 1885).Google Scholar
Ibn, A'tham al-Kūfī, Kitāb al-Futūḥ, ed. Khan, M. ʿAbu’l-Muʾid and Bukhārī, Sayyid ʿAbdu'l-Wahhāb, 8 vols, thus far (Da'iratu'l-Ma'arif il-Osmania Publications, New Series, ix/xii/i–viii, Hyderabad, 1968–75).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla:Togan, A. Zeki Validi (ed. trans.), Ibn Faḍlān's Reisebericht (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, xxiv, 3, Leipzig, 1939).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla:Kovalevskiĭ, A. P. (facs. ed., trans.) Kniga Akhmeda ibn Fadlana o ego putešestvii na Volgu v 921–922 gg. (Khar'kov, 1956).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla, ed. Dahān, S. (Damascus, 1379/1960).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risālah, ed. al-Dahān, S. (Damascus, 1960).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Togan, A.Z.V. (ed. trans.), Ibn Faḍdlān's Reisebericht (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 24.3, Leipzig, 1939).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Kovalevskij, A. P. (trans.), Kniga Akhmeda ibn Fadlana o ego putešestvii na Volgu v 921–922 gg. (Khar'kov, 1956).Google Scholar
Ibn, Khurdādhbih, Kitāb al-Masālik wa'l-Mamālik: Liber viarum et regnorum, ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum., vi, Leiden, 1889).Google Scholar
Ibn, Miskawaih, Tajārub al-Umam (“The Experiences of the Nations”): The Eclipse of the ‘Abbasid Caliphate, ed. Amedroz, H. F., trans. Margoliouth, D. S., 5 vols. (Oxford, 1920–1).Google Scholar
Ibn, Miskawaih, Tajārub al-Umam, ed. Amedroz, H. F., 3 vols. (Oxford, 1920, reprint, Baghdad, n.d.).Google Scholar
Ibn, Rusta, Kitāb al-A'lāq al-Nafīsa (“The Book of Precious Gems”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, VII, Leiden, 1892).Google Scholar
Ibn, Rusta, Kitāb al-A'lāq al-Nafīsa (“The Book of Precious Gems”): Khvol'son, D., Izvestija o khozarakh burtascekh, bolgarakh, mad'jarakh, slavjanakh i russakh Abu-Alī Akhmeda ben Omar ibn Dasta (Sanktpeterburg, 1868).Google Scholar
Idem, , “O dvukh karakhanidskikh kaganatakhNarody Azii i Afriki (1968), No. I.Google Scholar
Idem, , “The Polovcians and Rus',” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Idem, , Po sledam drevnekhorezmijskoj civilizacii (Moskva–Leningrad, 1948).Google Scholar
Il'inskaja, V. A., 1966, “Skifskie kurgany okolo g. Borispolja”, [Scythian kurgans near Borispol], Sovetskaja Arkheologija. 1966, 3, pp. 152–71.Google Scholar
Il'inskaja, V. A., 1968, Skify dneprovskogo lesostepnogo Levoberezh ' ja [The Scythians of the Forest-Steppe on the Left Bank of the Dnieper], (Kiev).Google Scholar
Il'inskaja, V. A., 1975, Ranneskifskie kurgany bassejna r. Tjasmin [Early Scythian Kurgans from the Tasmin Basin] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Inoue, Yasushi and Shinobu, Iwamura, Seiiki, Tokyo, 1963.Google Scholar
,Institut êtnografii, Academy of Sciences U.S.S.R., 1964, Atlas geograficheskikh otkrytii v Sibiri i severo-zapadnoj Amerike XVII–XVIII vv. (Moscow).
,Institute of Geography, U.S.S.R., Academy of Sciences, 1969, The Physical Geography of China, translated from the Russian, 2 volumes (New York).
Iordanes, , Getica. See Mierow, C. C., 1915.Google Scholar
Ise, Sentarō, Seiiki Keiei-shi no Kenkyū, Tokyo, 1962.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, Tomio, “Senpi Yūboku kokka no ryōiki,” Hokudai Shigaku, Oct., 1957.Google Scholar
Istvánovits, M., “Georgian Data Bearing on the Petchenegs”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 16 (1963).Google Scholar
Itkonen, Erkki, “Zur geographischen Ausdehnung der finnisch-ugrischen Urheimat,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 41 (1969), 303–6.Google Scholar
Jacenko, I. V., 1959, Skifija VII–V vv. do n.ê. [Scythia in the 7th to 5th centuries B.C.], (Kiev).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Esther, 1983, “Siberian Roots of the Scythian Stag Image,” Journal of Asian History 17, pp. 68–120.Google Scholar
Jagchid, S., 1970, “Trade, Peace and War Between the Nomadic Altaics and the Agricultural Chinese,” Bulletin of the Institute of China Border Studies 1, pp. 35–80 (Taiwan).Google Scholar
Jagchid, S.Bawden, C. R., 1965, “Some Notes on the Horse-Policy of the Yüan Dynasty,” Central Asiatic Journal., pp. 246–68.Google Scholar
Jakabfry, Imre, 1981, Archäologische Bibliographie des Mitteldonaubeckens 1967–1977, (Budapest).Google Scholar
Jakovenko, E. V., 1974, Skifi Skhidnogo Krimu v V–III st. do n.ê., [The Scythians of East Crimea in the 5th–3rd Centuries B.C.] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Jakubovskiĭ, A. Ju., “Rasskaz ibn Bibi o pokhode maloaziĭskikh turok na Sudak, polovcev i russkikh v načale XIII v.,” Vizantiĭskiĭ Vremennik 25 (1928).Google Scholar
Jakubovskiĭ, A. Ju., “O russko-khazarskikh i russko-kavkazskikh otnošenijakh v IX – X vv.,” Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR serija istorii i filosofii, 3.5 (1946).Google Scholar
Jamguzin, R. Z., “Istorija i sovremennoe sostojanie izučenija etnogeneza i etničeskoĭ istorii Baškir,” in Akmonov, I. K. (ed.), Iz istorii Baškirii (Ufa, 1968).Google Scholar
Jarring, G., Uzbek Texts from Afghan Turkistan (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N.F. Avd. i, vol. 34, Nr. 2, Lund–Leipzig, 1938).Google Scholar
Jehuda, hal-Levi, Kitāb al-Khazar: Book of Kuzari, trans. Hirschfeld, H. (New York, 1946).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Romilly J. H. (ed.), Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, Volume II, Commentary (London, 1962).Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl, 1966, “Mittelasien und Sibirien in Vortürkischer Zeit,” in Geschichte Mittelasiens, Handbuch der Orientalistik edited by Spuler, Bertold, Abteilung, Erste, 5. Bd., 5. Abschnitt, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl, 1966, “Mittelasien und Sibirien in Vortürkischer Zeit,” in Geschichte Mittelasiens, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl, 1964, Die frühen Steppenvölker. Der eurasiatischer Tierstil. Entstehung und sozialer Hintergrund, Welt, Kunst, (Baden-Baden).Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl, 1951, “The Altai Before the Turks,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 23, pp. 135–223.Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl, 1951–2, “Hunnen und Hiung-nu – ein archäologisches Problem,” Archiv für Völkerkunde 6/7, pp. 166–80.Google Scholar
Jisl, Lumir, 1968, “Wie sahen die alten Türken aus?,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 40, pp. 181–9.Google Scholar
John, of Nikiu, The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu, trans. Charles, R. H. (London, 1916).Google Scholar
Jones, W. R., 1977, “Le mythe du Barbare à travers l'histoire et la réalité,” Cultures iv, 2, pp. 104–24.Google Scholar
Jordanes, , Getica, Iordan, O proiskhoždenii i dejanijakh getov (ed. trans.) Skržinskaja, E. C̆ (Moskva, 1960).Google Scholar
Julien, Stanislas, “Notices sur les pays et les peuples étrangers, tirées des géographies et des annales chinoises, III, Les Oīgours,” Journal asiatique, 4.9: 50–66 (1847).Google Scholar
Juzjānī, , Ṭabaḳāt-i Nāṭirī, A General History of the Muḥammadan Dynasties of Asia, including Hindūstān from A.H. 194 (810 A.D.) to A.H. 658 (1260 A.D.) and the Irruption of the Infidel Mughals into Islām, trans. Raverty, H. G., 2 vols. (Bibliotheca Indica, New Series, vols. 272–3, London, 1881, reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Kafesoǧlu, I., Harezmşahler devleti tarihi (Ankara, 1956).Google Scholar
Kafesoǧlu, I., Sultan Melikşah devrinde büyük Selçuklu imparatorluǧu (Istanbul, 1953).Google Scholar
Kakabadze, S., “Operedviženijakh pečenegov v VII – VIII vv.,” Bjulleten' Kavkaz-skogo Istoriko-Arkheologičeskogo Instituta v Tiflise. No. 8 (1931).Google Scholar
Káldy-Nagy, Gyula, (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Kane, Daniel, 1988, The Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 153 (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar
Kao, Ch'ü-hsün, 1960, “The Ching Lu Shen Shrines of Han Sword Worship in Hsiung-nu Religion,” Central Asiatic Journal 5, pp. 221–32.Google Scholar
Kara, Dzh.Kychanov, E. I.Starikov, V. S., 1972, “Pervaja nakhodka chzhur-chzên'skikh rukopisnykh tekstov na bumage,” Pis'mennie pamjatniki Vostoka. Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovanija 1969, pp. 223–8.Google Scholar
Kara, György, 1975, “À propos de l'inscription khitane de 1150,” Annales Universitatis Budapestiensis. Sectio Linguistica, 6, pp. 163–7.Google Scholar
Kara, György, 1986–7, “On the Khitan Writing Systems,” Mongolian Studies 10, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
Karaev, O., Arabo-persidskie istočhniki o tjurkskikh narodakh (Frunze, 1973).Google Scholar
Karaulov, N. A., “Svedenija arabskikh geografov ix i x vekov po R. Kh. o Kavkaze, Armeniii Aderbeĭdžane,” Sbornik Materialov dlja Opisanija Mestnosteĭi Piemen Kavkaza 38 (1908).Google Scholar
Karaulov', N. A., “Bolkary na Kavkaze,” Sbornik Materialov dlja opisanija mest-nosteĭ i piemen Kavkaza (1908).Google Scholar
Kargalov, V. V.Vnešnepolitičeskie faktory razvitija feodal'noĭ Rusi. Feodal'naja Rus' i kočevniki (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Karmay, Samten G., 1972, The Treasury of Good Sayings: A Tibetan History of Bon, London Oriental Series, Vol. 26 (London).Google Scholar
K'art'lis Ts'khovreba (“The Life of Georgia”), ed. Qaukhch'ishvili, S., 2 vols. (T'bilisi, 1955, 1959).Google Scholar
Každan, A. P., “Ioan Mavropod: pečenegi i russkie v seredine XI v.,” Sbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta 8.1 (1963).Google Scholar
Khabičev, M. A., “O drevnetjurkskikh runičeskikh nadpisjakh v alanskikh kata-kombakh,” Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 2 (1970).Google Scholar
Khakimzjanov, F. S., “Sledy dialektov v jazyke pamjatnikov volžskoĭ Bulgarii,” Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 4 (1974).Google Scholar
Khalikov, A. Kh., “K voprosu o načale tjurkizacii naselenija Povolž'ja i Priural'ja,” Sovetskaja Etnografija no. 7 (1972).Google Scholar
Khalikova, E. A., “Pogrebal'nyĭ obrjad Tankeevskogo mogil'nika i ego vengerskie paralleli,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. M. 1981a, “Myths and Paradoxes of Nomadism,” Archivum europ. sociol. 22, pp. 141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazanov, A. M. 1981bThe Early State among the Eurasian Nomads,” in The Study of the State, edited by Claessen, Henri J. M. and Skalnik, Peter, pp. 155–75 (The Hague).Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. M. 1984, Nomads and the Outside World (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. M., 1971, Ocherki voennogo dela sarmatov [Essays on the Military Affairs of the Scythians] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. M., 1975, Social ' naja istorija skifov, [A Social History of the Scythians] (Moscow). [There is an English resume on pp. 334–41].Google Scholar
Khudjakov, Ju. S., 1980, Vooruzhenie enisejskikh kyrgyzov (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Kiselev, S. V., 1950, Drevnjaja istorija Juzhnoj Sibiri (Moskva).Google Scholar
Kiss, Attila, “iith Century Khazar Rings from Hungary with Hebrew Letters and Signs”, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 22 (1970).Google Scholar
Kiyose, Gisaburo, 1972, A Study of the Jurchen Language and Script, Reconstruction and Decipherment (Kyoto).Google Scholar
Kjuner, N. V., 1961, Kitajskie izvestija o narodakh Juzhnoj Sibiri, Central'noj Azii i Dal'nego Vostoka, (Moskva).Google Scholar
Klapchuk, I. N., 1970, “Galechnye orudija mestonakhozhdenija Muzbel’ 1–2 v Central'nom Kazakhstane,” in: Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur Kazakhstana (Alma-Ata), pp. 217–26.Google Scholar
Klaproth, J., 1826, Tableaux historiques de l'Asie depuis la monarchic de Cyrus jusqu'à nos jours, (Paris).Google Scholar
Kljashtornyj, S. G., 1971, “Runicheskaja nadpis' iz vostochnoj Gobi,” in Studia Turcica, edited by Ligeti, L., pp. 249–258 (Budapest), and Livshic, V. A., 1972, “The Sogdian Inscription of Bugut Revised,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 26, pp. 69–102.Google Scholar
Kljashtornyj, S. G., 1962, “Problemy rannej istorii plemeni türk (ashina),” in Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 130, pp. 278–81.Google Scholar
Kljashtornyj, S. G., 1964, Drevnetjurkskie runicheskie pamjatniki kak istochnik po istorii Srednej Azii (Moskva).Google Scholar
Kljashtornyj, S. G., 1977, “Mifologicheskie sjuzheti v drevne turkskikh pamjatnikakh,” Tjurkolo-gicheskij sbornik, pp. 117–38.Google Scholar
Kljaštornyĭ, S. G., Drevetjurkskie runičeskie pamjatniki kak istočnik po istorii Sredneĭ Azii (Moskva, 1964).Google Scholar
Kljaštornyĭ, S. G., “Sogdijcy v Semirech'e,” Sovetskaja êtnografija (1959), No. I.Google Scholar
Kmoskó, Mihály, “Araber und Chazaren,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum I (1921–5) pp. 280–92.Google Scholar
Koeppen, W. and Geiger, R., 1930, Handbuch der Klimatologie, 4 volumes (Berlin).Google Scholar
Kőhalmi, Katalin U, 1972, A steppék nomádja lóháton, fegyverben (Budapest).Google Scholar
Kokhavskiĭ, I., Proiskhodenie čuvašskogo naroda (Čeboksary, 1965).Google Scholar
Kokovcev, P. K. (ed., trans.), Evreĭsko-khazarskaja perepiska v X veke (Leningrad, 1932).Google Scholar
Koledarov, P. S., “Naïranni spomenovanija na Bŭlgarite vŭpkhu starinnite karti,” Izvestija na Instituta za Istorija, Bŭlgarska Akademija na Naukite 20 (1968).Google Scholar
Kollautz, A. 1965, “Awaren, Langobarden und Slaven im Noricum und Istrien,” Carinthia I, pp. 619–45.Google Scholar
Kollautz, A. 1966, “Awaren, Franken und Slawen in Karantanien und Niederpannonien und die fränkische und byzantinische Mission,” Carinthia I, 156, pp. 232–75.Google Scholar
Kollautz, A. 1970, Denkmäler byzantinischen Christentums aus der Awarenzeit der Donauländer (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Kollautz, A. 1979, “Völkerbewegungen an der unteren und mittleren Donau im Zeitraum von 558/562 bis 582 (Fall von Sirmium),” Zeitschrift für Ostforschung 28, pp. 448–89.Google Scholar
KollautzA.-Miyawaka, Hisayuki A.-Miyawaka, Hisayuki, 1970, Geschichte und Kultur eines völkerwanderungszeitlichen Nomadenvolkes. Die Jou–jan der Mongolei und die Awaren in Mitteleuropa, I–II (Klagenfurt).Google Scholar
Kollautz, Arnulf, 1965, Bibliographie der historischen und archäologischen Veröffentlichungen zur Awarenzeit Mitteleuropas und des fernen Ostens mit Berichtigungen und Ergänzungen zu der von Dezsö Csall´ny in der “Archäologischen Denkmälern der Awarenzeit in Mitteleuropa,” Budapest 1956, angeführten Literatur (Klagenfurt). [Complete bibliography up to 1964].Google Scholar
Kollautz, Arnulf, Miyakawa, Hisayuki, Geschichte und Kultur eines völkerwanderungszeitlichen Nomadenvolkes. Die Jou- Jan der Mongolei und die Awaren in Mitteleurope, 2 vols. (Aus Forschung und Kunst, Herausgegeben vom Geschichtsverein für Kärnten, vols. 10–11, Klagenfurt, 1970).Google Scholar
Kononov, A. N., “Ketimologii etnonimov kypčak, kuman, kumyk,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 48 (1976).Google Scholar
Konow, Sten, 1929, Kharoṣṭhī Inscriptions with the Exception of those of Aśoka, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum ii, Pt. i (Calcutta).Google Scholar
Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos, : Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, ed. Moravcsik, Gyula, trans. Jenkins, R. J. H. (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, i, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C., 1967).Google Scholar
,Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos: Constantinus Porphyrogenitus, Excerpta de Legationibus, ed. Boer, C. (Berlin, 1903).Google Scholar
,Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos: Constantinus Porphyrogenitus, Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, ed. Moravcsik, Gyula, trans. Romilly, J. H.Jenkins, (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae 1, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., 1967).Google Scholar
Köprülü, M. F., Türk edebiyatmda ilk mutasavviflar (Istanbul, 1919, reprint, Ankara, 1966).Google Scholar
Kossányi, Béla, “Az úzok és kománok történetéehez a XI–XII században,” Századok, 57–8 (1923–4), pp. 519–37.Google Scholar
Kothe, Heinz, 1970, “Apollons ethnokulturelle Herkunft,” Klio 52, pp. 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovačević, J., 1966, “Avari na Jadranu,” in Materijali III, Simpozijum praistorijske i srendjevekovne sekcie Arkheološkog Društva Jugoslavie, Novi Sad 1965, pp. 53–81, (Beograd).Google Scholar
Kovačević, J., 1977, Avarski Kaganat (Beograd).Google Scholar
Kovpanenko, G. T., 1967, Pam ' jatki skif ' skogo chasu v basejni Vorskla [Sites of the Scythian Period in the Vorskla Basin] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Kovpanenko, G. T., 1981, Kurgany ranneskifskogo vremeni v bassejne r. Ros, [Kurgans of the Early Scythian Period in the Vorskla Basin] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Kovrig, I., 1955, “Contribution au problème de l'occupation de la Hongrie par les Avars,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 6, pp. 163–184.Google Scholar
Kovrig, I., 1963, Das awarenzeitliche Gräberfeld von Alattyán (Budapest).Google Scholar
Köymen, M., “Büyük Selç;uklu imparatorluǧu tarihinde Oǧuz istilasi,” Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coǧrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (1947).Google Scholar
Köymen, M., Selçuklu devri Türk tarihi (Ankara, 1963).Google Scholar
Krader, L. 1952, “Neolithic Finds in the Chukchi Peninsula,” American Antiquity Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Krause, W. 1955, “Tocharisch,” Handbuch der Orientalistik, edited by Spuler, B., Vol. 4, Iranistik, Abschnitt 3.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, K., “Scythae”, in Pauly-Wissowa, , Realencyclopaedie der Altertumswissenschaften (2e Reihe, 11, 1923, pp. 923–46). The oft–quoted work of Tomaschek, 1888, is basically flawed.Google Scholar
Kristó, Gyula, Róna-Tas, András (eds.), Bevezetés a magyar őstörténet kutatásának forrásaiba, III, 3 vols. (Budapest, 1976–7).Google Scholar
Krivcova-Grakova, O. A., 1952, “Alekseevskoe poselenie i mogilnik,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo istoricheskogo muzeja 17, pp. 57–172.Google Scholar
K'uang, P'ing-chang, “T'ang-tai kung-chu ho-ch'in k'ao” (A study of the diplomatic marriages of T'ang princesses), Shih-hsüeh nien-pao, 2.2: 23–68 (1935).Google Scholar
Kubo, Yasuhiko, “Bo Ki Kō setchi no mokuteki ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 26, Nos. 2–3 (Jan., 1966).Google Scholar
Kudrjašov, K. V., Poloveckaja step' (Zapiski Vsesojuznogo Geografičeskogo Obščestva, novaja serija, vol. 2, Moskva, 1948).
Kumekov, B. E., Gosudarstvo Kimekov 1X–X1 vv. po arabskim istočnikam (Alma-Ata, 1972).Google Scholar
Kumykov, T. Kh., “Etnogenez balkarskogo i Karačaevskogo narodov v istoričeskoĭ literature,” in Treskov, I. V. et al. (eds.), Materialy naučnoĭ sessii po probleme proiskhoždenija balkarskogo i Karačaevskogo narodov (Nal'čik, 1960).Google Scholar
Kupfer, Franciszek, Lewicki, Tadeusz, Źródła hebrajskie do dziejów Słowian i niektórych innych ludów środkowej i wschodniej Europy (Wrocław-Warszawa, 1956).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Peçeneklere dair arastirmalar” (“Researches on the Pechenegs”), Türkiyat Mecmuasi, 5 (1935).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, Peçenek tarihi (“History of the Pechenegs”) (Istanbul, 1937).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Bulgar,” Islâm Ansiklopedisi (Istanbul-Ankara, 1940 to present), fasc. 20.Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Muḥammad bin A's̱am al-Kufi'nin Kitâb al-Futûḥ'u” (“The Kitāb al-Putūḥ of Muḥhammad b. A'tham al-Kufī”), Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coǧrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1949).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, IV–XVIII yüzyillarda karadeniz kuzeyindeki Türk kavimleri ve devletleri (“The Turkic Tribes and States in the North of the Black Sea in the 4th to 18th Centuries”), (Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Co`rafya Fakültesi Yayinlari, 182, Ankara, 1972).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Źródła hebrajskie do dziejó w środkowej i wschodniej Europy w okresie wczesnego średniowiecza (IX–XIII ww.),” Przegla̧d Orientalistyczny, 15.3 (1955).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Źródła arabskie i hebrajskie do dziejów Słowian w okresie wczesnego średniowiecza,” Studia Źródłoznawcze, 3 (1958).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “'Arisu. Un nom de tribu énigmatique cité dans le lettre du roi Khazar Joseph (Xe siècle)”, Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique, 3.1 (1962).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Écrivains arabes du IXe au XVIe siècle traitant de l'ambre jaune de la Baltique et de son importation en pays arabes,” Folia Orientalia, 4 (1962–3).Google Scholar
Kurat, Akdes Nimet, “Ludy Daghestanu i północnego Kaukazu w oczach średniowiecznych pisarzy arabskich (IX–X ww.),” Przegla̧d Orientalistyczny, 46.2 (1963).Google Scholar
Kürti, Béla, 1980, “Avarkori sírleletek a Békés megyei Gerláról,” Muzeumi kutatások Csongrád megyében, pp. 145–152.Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Jitsuzō, Chang Ch'ien Hsi-cheng K'ao. Translated into Chinese by Lien, Yang, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Kuzeev, R. G. (ed.) Baškirskie šežere (Ufa, 1960).Google Scholar
Kuzeev, R. G., Proiskhozhdenie baškirskogo naroda (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Kuz'min, A. G., Rjazanskoe letopisanie (Moskva, 1965).Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, V. A., 1984, “The Avars in the Nart Epos of the Ossets,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 38, pp. 165–169.Google Scholar
Kyzlasov, L. R., Istorija Tuvi v srednie veka (Moskva, 1969).Google Scholar
Lane, George S., 1958, “The Present State of Tocharian Studies,” Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress of Linguists, pp. 252 ff. (Oslo).Google Scholar
Lane, George S., 1964, “On the Significance of Tocharian for Indo-European Linguistics,” in Classical, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Louis Ullman, edited by Henderson, Charles Jr., vol. i, pp. 283–92 (Roma).Google Scholar
Lane, George S., 1970, “Tocharian: Indo-European and Non-Indo-European Relationships,” in Indo-European and Indo-Europeans, edited by Cardona, George, Hoenigswald, Henry M. and Senn, Alfred, pp. 73–88 (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Larichev, V. E., 1969, Paleolit Severnoj, Central'noj i Vostochnoj Azii, 1 (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Laščuk, L. P., Formirovanie narodnosti Komi (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
László, Gy., 1955, & Eacute;tudes archéologiques sur l'histoire de la société des Avars, Archaeologica Hungarica, New Series. XXXIV (Budapest).Google Scholar
László, Gy., 1965, “Les problèmes soulevés par le groupe à la ceinture ornée de griffons et de rinceaux de l'époque avare finissante,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 17, pp. 73–5.Google Scholar
László, Gyula, 1944, A honfoglaló magyar nép élete (Budapest).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, 1970a, A népvándorláskor művészete Magyarországon (Budapest).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, 1970b, Steppenvölker und Germanen. Kunst der Völkerwanderungszeit (Wien–Müinchen–Budapest).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, 1975, “Inter Sabariam et Carnuntum …,” Studia Slavica 21, pp. 139–57.Google Scholar
László, Gyula, “K voprosu o formirovanii finno-ugrov,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, A honfoglalókról (Budapest, 1973).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, A “kettős honfoglalás” (Budapest, 1978).Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, 1938, “The Geographical Factor in Mongol History,” The Geographical Journal 91.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, 1938, reprinted in Lattimore, Owen, Studies in Frontier History. Collected Papers 1928–1958, pp. 241–58 (Oxford 1962).Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, 1940, Inner Asian Frontiers of China, American Geographical Society, Research Series No. 21 (New York).Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, Studies in Frontier History. Collected Papers 1928–1958 (Oxford 1962).Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, 1940, The Inner Asian Frontiers of China, American Geographical Society, Research Series No. 21 (New York).Google Scholar
Latyshev, V. V. 1893–1947, Izvestija drevnikh pisatelej grecheskikh i latinskikh o Skifii i Kavkaze = Scythica et Caucasica e veteribus scriptoribus graecis et latinis, 1. Scriptores Graeci (Sanktpeterburg 1893), ii.Google Scholar
Latyshev, V. V.Scriptores Latini, 1–2 (Sankpeterburg 1904–1906), iii. “Izvestija drevnikh pisatelej o skifii i Kavkaze,” VDI 4 (1947), pp. 230–348.Google Scholar
Laufer, Berthold, 1914, Chinese Clay Figures. Part I, Prolegomena on the History of Defensive Armor, Field Museum of Natural History, Publication 177, Anthropological Series XIII, No. 2, (Chicago).Google Scholar
Laufer, Berthold, 1919, Sino-Iranica, Chinese Contributions to the History and Civilization in Ancient Iran, Field Museum Anthropological Series XV, 3, (Chicago).Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von, “Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho III”, Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2: 1–49 (1922).Google Scholar
Lechner, Kilian, 1954, Hellenen und Barbaren im Weltbild der Byzantiner, (München).Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul, 1979–81, Les plus anciens recueils des miracles de Saint Démétrius, 2 volumes (Paris).Google Scholar
Lenkov, V. D., 1974, Metallurgija i metallo-obrabotka u chzhurchzhênej v XII veke (po materialam issledovanii Majginskogo gorodishcha) (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Leskov, A. M., 1974, Die skythischen Kurgane, Zeitschrift für Archäologie und Urgeschichte 5 (special edition).Google Scholar
Leskov, A. M., 1981, Kurgany: nakhodki, problemy [Kurgans: Finds and Problems] (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Lévi, Sylvain and Chavannes, Éd., “Voyages des pélerins bouddhistes, L'itinéraire d'Ou-k'ong (751–790),” Journal asiatique, 9.6: 341–84 (1895).Google Scholar
Levin, M. G.Potapov, L. P., 1956, The Peoples of Siberia, edited by Dunn, Stephen (Chicago).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz (ed. trans.), Źródła arabskie do dziejów słowiańszczyzny, 1–11 (Wrocław-Kraków-Warszawa, 1956–77).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, “Türkische Stadt Dānā nach einem Bericht des Arabischen Geographen Ibn al-Faqīh,” Folia Orientalia, 13 (1971).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, “Les noms des Hongrois et de la Hongrie chez les médiévaux géographes arabes et persans,” Folia Orientalia, 19 (1978).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, Źródła arabskie do dziejów Słowiańszczyzny, 1–11, 1–2 3 vols. (Wroc-law–Kraków–Warszawa, 1956, 1969, 1977).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, Polska i kraje sa̧siednie w świetle ‘Ksiȩgi Rogera’ geografa arabskiego z XII w. al-Idrīsīʾ ego, 2 vols. (Kraków–Warszawa, 1945, 1954).Google Scholar
Łewond, (Ghevond), Patmut'iwnłevondeay metsi vardapeti Hayots', ed. Ezeants', I. (St. Peterburg, 1887).Google Scholar
Li, Fang-kuei, 1959, “Tibetan glo-ban-'dring,” Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren Dedicata, pp. 55–9 (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Liberov, P. D., 1965, Pamjatniki skifskogo vremeni na Severnom Donu [Sites of the Scythian Period in the North Don area] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Ligeti, L., “Egy karluk törzs neve kínai átírásban,” Magyar Nyelv 45 (1949) pp. 168–70.Google Scholar
Ligeti, L., “À propos du ‘Rapport sur les rois demeurant dans le Nord’Études Tibétaines dédiées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Ligeti, L., 1952, “Note préliminaire sur le déchiffrement des ‘petits caractères’ joutchen,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 3, pp. 211–28.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, 1986, “A pannóniai avarok etnikuma és nyelve,” Magyar Nyelv 82, pp. 129–51. [Essential contribution to the study of the ethnicity and language of the Avars].Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Kündü,“ Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 48 (1931).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régibb török jövevényszavaink magyarázatához,” Magyar Nyelv, XXIX (1933), XXX (1934), XXXI (1935), XXXIII (1937).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Az uráli magyar őshaza,” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A török szókészlet története és török jövevényszavaink, Gyöngy,” Magyar Nyelv, XLII (1946).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Gyarmat és Jenő,” Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 40 (1963), 230–9.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A magyar nép mongol-kori neveiMagyar Nyelv, LX (1964), 385–404.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régi török jövevényszavaink etimológiai problémái” in Benkő, L., Sál, E. K. (eds.), Az etimológia elmélete és módszere Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 89, (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A magyar nyelv török kapcsolatai és ami körülöttük van,” Magyar Nyelv, LXXII (1976), pp. 11–27, 129–36.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, A magyar nyelv török kapcsolatai és ami körülöttük van, ed. Schütz, E., Apor, E. (Budapest Oriental Reprints, Series A 1 and 2, vol. III, Budapest, 1977–9).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régi török eredetű neveink,” Magyar Nyelv, LXXIV (1978) pp. 257–274, LXXV (1979) PP. 26–42, LXXV (1979) pp. 259–273.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A kazár Σάρκєλ név jelentéséhez,” Magyar Nyelv, XXXIII (1936).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Sur deux mots comans,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 10 (1962).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “À propos du ‘Rapport sur les rois demeurant dans le Nord’,” & Eacute;tudes Tibétaines dediées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis (Lajos), “Ảpropos des éléments altaïques de la langue hongrois,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11 (1961), 15–42.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis (Lajos), “Quelques problèmes étymologiques des anciens mots d'emprunt turcs de la langue hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 29 (1975), 279–88.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis, 1971, “A propos du ‘Rapport sur les rois demeurant dans le nord’,” in Etudes tibétaines dédiées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou, pp. 166–89 (Paris).Google Scholar
Lin, Lū-chih, Hsiung-nu Shih, Hong Kong, Chung-Hua Wen-Hua, 1963.Google Scholar
Lindner, Rudi Paul, 1981, “Nomadism, Horses and Huns,” Past and Present 92, pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipták, P. 1957, “Awaren und Magyaren im Donau–Theiss Zwischenstromgebiet. (Zur Anthropologie des VII–XIII Jahrhunderts),” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 8, pp. 199–268.Google Scholar
Lipták, P. 1959, “The ‘Avar Period’ Mongoloids in Hungary,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 10, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar
Litvinskij, B. A.Sedov, A. V., 1984 Kul'ty i ritualy kushanskoj Baktrii pogrebal'nyj obrjad (Moskva 1984).Google Scholar
Liu Chih-hsiao, Wei-wu-erh tsu li-shih (shang-pien) (History of the Uighur Nationality, Volume I), Min-tsu chu-pan-she (Nationalities Press), Peking, 1985.Google Scholar
Liu, Mau-tsai, Die Chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Türken (T'u-küe), 2 vols Göttinger Asiatische Forschungen, vol. 10, Wiesbaden, 1958).Google Scholar
Liu, Mau-tsai, 1969, Kutscha und seine Beziehungen zu China vom 2. Jh.v. bis zum 6.Jh.n.Chr., i–ii, Asiatische Forschungen. 27, (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Liu, Mau-tsai, 1958. Die chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Türken (T'u-küe), I–II, Göttinger Asiatische Forschungen 10 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Liu, Mau-tsai, Die Chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Türken, (T'u-küe), 2 vols. (Göttinger Asiatische Forschungen, vol. 10, Wiesbaden, 1958).Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael, 1969, “Chinese Relations with Central Asia,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 32, pp. 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokesh, Chandra and Namdak, Tenzin (editors), 1968, History and Doctrine of Bon-po Nispanna-Yoga (Tibetan Text), Satapitaka Series 73 (New Delhi).Google Scholar
Lotz, János, “Etymological Connections of magyar Hungarian,” in For Roman Jakobson (The Hague, 1956).Google Scholar
, Ssu-mien, Yen-shih Cha-chi, Shang-hai, 1937.Google Scholar
Lydolph, Paul, 1970, Geography of the U.S.S.R., 2nd edition (New York).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., “Einige ostseefinnische Lehnwörter in komi-syrjänischen Mundarten,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 31 (1959), 164–8.Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., “K etimologii slov ugry i jugra,” Etimologija (1968).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., et al. (eds.), Osnovy finno-ugrovskogo jazykoznanija/Voprosy proiskhoždenija i razvitija finno-ugrovskikh jazykov (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., et al. (eds.), Osnovy finno-ugrovskogo juzykoznanija/Marũskũ, permskie i ugrovskie jazyki (Moskva, 1976).Google Scholar
Ma, Ch'ang-shou, Pei-Ti yü Hsiung-nu, Peking, 1962.Google Scholar
Ma, Tuan-lin, Wen-hsien t'ung-k'ao (Complete examination of old documents and various compilations), Wan-yu wen-k'u ed., Shih-t'ung, vol. 7, 2 vols. (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, al-Kāshgharī, Dîwân Lûghat al-Turk, facs. ed. Atalay, B. (Ankara, 1941).Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, al-Kāshgharī, Turkish translation by Atalay, B., Dîvânu Lûgat-it-Türk, 3 vols. (Ankara, 1939–1941).Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A., The Magyars in the Ninth Century (Cambridge, 1930, reprint: 1968).Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A., “The Petchenegs,” Slavonic Review, 8 (1929), pp. 342–55.Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A., “The End of the Huns,” Byzantinisch-neugriechische Jahrbücher, 10 (1934).Google Scholar
MacDowall, D. W., 1960, “The Weight Standards of the Gold and Copper Coinages of the Kushana Dynasty from Kadphises to Vasudeva,” Journal of the Numismatic Society of India 22, pp. 63–74.Google Scholar
Machinskij, D. A., 1972, “O vremeni pervogo aktivnogo vystuplenija sarmatov v Pridneprov'e po svidetel'stvam antichnykh pis'mennykh istochnikov” [On the Time of the First Active Appearance of the Sarmatians in the Dnieper Area, According to the Testimony of Ancient Written Sources], Arkheologicheskij sbornik Gos. Ermitazha. 13, pp. 30–54.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Colin, The Uighur empire according to the T'ang dynastic histories. A Study in Sino-Uighur relations 744-840, 2nd ed. (The Australian National University Asian publications series, vol. 3; Canberra, 1972).Google Scholar
Mackinder, H. J., 1904, “The Geographical Pivot of History,” The Geograpical Journal 23, pp. 424–37.Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1939, “The Ting-ling,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 4, pp. 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1944–5, “Huns and Hsiung-nu,” Byzantion 17, pp. 222–43.Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1955, “Pseudo-Huns,” Central Asiatic Journal. 1, pp. 101–6.Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1955, “Pseudo-Huns,” Central Asiatic Journal I, pp. 101–6.Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1961, “Archaistic Names of the Hiung-nu,” Central Asiatic Journal 6, pp. 249–61.Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1973, The World of the Huns (University of California Press).Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, “Akatir,” Central Asiatic Journal, 11 (1966).Google Scholar
Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, The World of the Huns, ed. Knight, Max (Berkeley, 1973).Google Scholar
Magnae Moraviae Fontes Historici, edited by Havlik, L., 1966, 1967, 1969, 1971, 4 volumes (Praha–Brno).Google Scholar
Mahler, Jane Gaston, 1959, The Westerners Among the Figurines of the T'ang Dynasty of China, Serie Orientale Roma xx, (Rome).Google Scholar
Makk, Ferenc, 1975, Traduction et commentaire de l'homélie écrite probablement par Théodore le Syncelle sur le siège de Constantinople en 626 (Szeged).Google Scholar
Maksimova, M. I., 1954, “Serebrjanoe zerkalo iz Kelermesa” [A Silver Mirror from Kelermes] Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 21, pp. 281–305.Google Scholar
Malalas, loannes, Chronographia, ed. Dindorf, L. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1831).Google Scholar
Maljavkin, A. G., 1981, Istoricheskaja geografija Central'noj Azii (Materialy i issledovanija) (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Malov, S. E., 1951, 1952, Enisejskaja pis'mennost' Tjurkov (Moskva–Leningrad).Google Scholar
Malov, S. E., 1951, 1959, Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti Mongolii i Kirgizia, (Moskva– Leningrad).Google Scholar
Malov, S. E., Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis'mennosti (Moskva–Leningrad, 1951).Google Scholar
Mancevich, A. P., 1964, “O plastine iz kurgana Karagodeuashkh” [On the Plate from the Karagodeuashkh Kurgan], Arkheologicheskij sbornik Gos. Ermitazha. 6, pp. 128–38.Google Scholar
Mancevich, A. P., 1966, “Derevjannye sosudy skifskoj êpokhi,“Arkheologicheskij sbornik Gos. Ermitazha. 8, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Manninen, I., Die Finnisch-Ugrischen Völker (Leipzig, 1932).Google Scholar
Maricq, André, 1958a, “La grande inscription de Kaniṣka et l'étéo-tokharien, l'ancienne langue de la Bactriana”, Journal asiatique pp. 345–440.Google Scholar
Maricq, André, 1958b, “Classica et Orientalia, 5, Res Gestae Divi Saporis,” Syria, pp. 295–360. 1968 in Basham, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maringer, J., 1950, Contribution to the Prehistory of Mongolia, The Sino-Swedish Expedition, Publication 34 (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Markwart, J., 1930, Südarmenien und die Tigrisquellen nach griechischen und arabischen Geographen (Wien).Google Scholar
Marquart, J., 1898, Die Chronologie der alttürkischen Inschriften (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Marquart, J., 1901, Ērānšahr nach der Geographie des Ps. Moses Xorenac'i, Abhandlungen der königl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Phil. hist. Kl. NF. Bd. iii, Nr. 2.Google Scholar
Marquart, J., Über das Volkstum der Komanen, in Bang, W., Marquart, J., Osttürkische Dialektstudien (Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, n.F., vol. 13, Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Marquart, Jos., ‘Ğuwainī's Bericht über die Bekehrung der Uiguren,’ Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 27: 486–502 (1912).Google Scholar
Marquart, Josef, Osteuropäische und Ostasiatische Streifzüge (Leipzig, 1903, reprint: Hildesheim, 1961).Google Scholar
Marquart, Josef, “Ein arabischer Bericht über die arktischen (uralischen) Länder aus dem 10. Jahrhundert,” Ungarische Jahrbücher, 4 (1924), 261–334.Google Scholar
Marquart, Joseph, Die Chronologie der alttürkischen Inschriften. Mit einem Vorwort und Anhang von Prof. W. Bang in Löwen (Leipzig, 1898).Google Scholar
Marquart, Joseph, “Historische Glossen zu den alttürkischen Inschriften,” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 12 (1898).Google Scholar
Marquart, Joseph, Ērānšahr nach der Geographie des Ps. Moses Xorenac'i (Abhandlungen der kgl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Phil.-hist. Klasse, Neue Folge, vol. III N.2, Berlin, 1901).Google Scholar
Marquart, Joseph, Osteuropäische und Ostasiatische Streifzüge (Leipzig, 1903, reprint: Hildesheim, 1961).Google Scholar
Marquart, Joseph, Über das Volkstum der Komanen – in Bang, W. and Marquart, J., Osttürkische Dialektstudien (Abhandlungen der kgl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, phil.-hist. Klasse, New Series, vol. 13, N.I, Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Marshall, John, 1951, Taxila. An Illustrated Account of Archaeological Excavations Carried out at Taxila under the Orders of the Government of India between the Years 1913 and 1934, 3 volumes (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Martin, M.F.C., 1937–38, “Coins of Kidara and the Little Kushans,” Numismatic Supplement of the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 47, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. I., 1964, “Andronovskaja kul'tura,” in Drevnjaja Sibir, first version of Istorija Sibiri (Ulan-Udê), pp. 249–61.Google Scholar
Masson, M. E., 1968, “K voprosu o severnykh granicakh gosudarstva ‘velikikh kushan’,” Obshchestvennye nauki v Uzbekistane 8, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
Masson, V. M.Sarianidi, V. I., 1972, Central Asia. Turkmenia Before the Achaemenids (London).Google Scholar
Materialy po deshifrovke kidan'skogo pis'ma., 1970, I. Starikov, V. S., Formal' nyj analiz funkcional'noj struktury teksta; II. Arapov, M., Karapet'jan, A., Malinovskaja, Z., Probst, M., Opyt morfologicheskogo analiza tekstov malogo kidan'skogo pis'ma (Moscow).Google Scholar
Matjushchenko, V. I.Lozhnikova, G. B., 1969, Raskopki mogil'nika u derevni Rostovka bliz Omska v 1966–1969 gg. Predvaritel'noe soobshchenie,” in Iz istorii Sibiri (Tomsk).Google Scholar
Matsuda, Hisao, Kodai Tenzan no Rekishi Chirigaku Teki Kenkyū, Tokyo, revised edition, 1970.Google Scholar
McGovern, W. M., 1939, The Early Empires of Central Asia: A Study of the Scythians and the Huns and the Part they Played in World History (Chapel Hill, N.C.).Google Scholar
Medoedov, A. G., 1970, “Arealy paleoliticheskikh kul'tur Sary-Arka,” in: Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur Kazakhstana (Alma-Ata), pp. 200–16.Google Scholar
Medvedev, V. E., 1977, Kul'tura amurskikh chzhurchzhênej konec X–XI vek (pomaterialam gruntovykh mogil' nikov) (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Meigs, Peveril, 1953, “World Distribution of Arid and Semi-Arid Homoclimates,” in Arid Zone Hydrology, pp. 202–10 (Paris, UNESCO).Google Scholar
Meljukova, A. I., 1964, Vooruzhenie skifov, [The Arms of the Scythians], Arkheologija SSSR. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, D 1–4, (Moscow).Google Scholar
Meljukova, A. I., 1979, Skifija i frakijskij mir [Scythia and the Thracian World] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Meljukova, A. I., 1981, Krasnokutskij kurgan [The Krasnokutsk Kurgan] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., “Etymological Notes on Some Päčänäg Names”, Byzantion, 17 (1944–5) PP. 256–80.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., “Altaic Elements in the Proto-Bulgarian Inscriptions,” Byzantion, 21 (1951).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., “The Oriental Elements in the Vocabulary of the Oldest Russian Epos, the Igor' Tale,” Supplement to Word (Monograph No. I, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., “Tmūtorkan',”, Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie, 29 (1960).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., Studies in Caucasian History (London, 1953).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., A History of Sharvān and Darband (Cambridge, 1958).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., “Proiskhoždenie slova TZITZAKION,” Seminarium Kondakovianum IV (1931).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H., Byzantinoturcica,2 2 vols. (Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten, vols. 10–11, Berlin, 1958).Google Scholar
Menges, Karl A., 1968, Tungusen und Ljao, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 38, I (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Merkuškin, G. Ja., “Vkhoždenie mordovskogo naroda v sostav russkogo centralizo-vannogo gosudarstva,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Meserve, Ruth I., 1982, “The Inhospitable Land of the Barbarian,” Journal of Asian History 16, pp. 51–89.Google Scholar
Meuli, K. 1935, “Scythica,” Hermes 70, pp. 121–76.Google Scholar
Meuli, K. 1960, “Scythica Vergiliana. Ethnographisches, Archäologisches und Mythologisches zu Vergils Georgica 3, 367ff.,” Beiträge zur Völkerkunde (Basel), pp. 88–200.Google Scholar
Michael, Syrus: Chronique de Michel le Syrien, ed. trans. Chabot, J. B., 4 vols. (Paris, 1899–1910).Google Scholar
Mierow, C. C., 1915, The Gothic History of Jordanes (Princeton).Google Scholar
Mikami, Tsugio, Kinshi kenkyū, 1970, 1972, 1973, [Researches on Chin History], 3 volumes (Tokyo).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., “Novye Epigrafičeskie dannye dlja istorii Srednej Azii IX v.,” Êpigrafika Vostoka, 5 (1951).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., ögel, B., Islâmiyetten öonce Türk kültür tarihi (Ankara, 1962).Google Scholar
Mikhailova, A. N., Türk mitolojisi (Selçuklu tarih ve medeniyeti enstitüsü yayinlan, vol. I), vol. I (Ankara, 1971).Google Scholar
Minns, E. H., 1913. Scythians and Greeks. A Survey of Ancient History and Archaeology on the North Coast of the Euxine from the Danube to the Caucasus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Minns, Ellis H., 1942, “The Art of the Northern Nomads,” Proceedings of the British Academy 28.Google Scholar
Minorsky, V., Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam ‘The regions of the world’ a Persian geography 372 A.H. 982 A.D. (E.J.W. Gibb Memorial New Series, vol. II; London, 1937).Google Scholar
Minorsky, V., “Tamīm ibn Baḥr's journey to the Uyghurs,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12.2: 275–305 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir, “The Khazars and the Turks in the Akām al-Marjān,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 9 (1937–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miquel, André, 1975, La géographie humaine du monde musulman jusqu'au milieu du ne siècle. Géographie arabe et représentation du monde: la terre et l'étranger, École Pratique des Hautes Étrudes, Civilisations et Sociétés 37, (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miskolczy, Gy., “A kúnok ethnikumához”, Történeti Szemle, 7 (1918).Google Scholar
Mochanov, Ju. A., 1969a, Mnogoslojnaja stojanka Bel'kachi 1 i periodizacija kamennogo veka Jakutii (Moskva).Google Scholar
Mochanov, Ju. A., 1969bThe Early Neolithic of the Aldan,” and “The Bel'kachinsk Culture on the Aldan,” Arctic Anthropology 6, no. 1, pp. 95–103 and 104–14.Google Scholar
Mohay, A., 1979, “Priskos' Fragment über die Wanderungen der Steppenvölker. (Übersicht über die neueren Forschungen),” in Studies in the Sources of Pre–Islamic Central Asia, edited by Harmatta, J., pp. 129–144 (Budapest).Google Scholar
Molè, G., 1970, The T'u-yü-hun from the Northern Wei to the Time of the Five Dynasties, Serie Orientale Roma xli (Rome).Google Scholar
Molnár, Erik, A magyar nép őstörténete (Budapest, 1953).Google Scholar
Molnár, Erik, A magyar társadalom története az őskortól az Árpádkorig (Budapest, 2nd ed. 1949).Google Scholar
Mongaĭt, A. L., Rjazanskaja zemlja (Moskva, 1961).Google Scholar
Moór, Elemér, “Die Ausbildung des urungarischen Volkes im Lichte der Laut-und Wortgeschichte,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 6 (1956), 7 (1957), 8 (1958), 9 (1959), 10 (1960).Google Scholar
Moór, Elemér, “Die Benennungen der Ungarn in den Quellen des IX und X Jahrhunderts,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. 31 (1959), 191–229.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gy.Jenkins, J.R.H., 1967, Constantine Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio, new, revised edition (Dumbarton Oaks).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, 1926, “Attilas Tod in Geschichte und Sage,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum 2, pp. 83–116.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, 1946, “Byzantine Christianity and the Magyars in the Period of their Migration,” The American Slavic and East European Review 5, pp. 25–45. Reprinted in Moravcsik, Gyula, Studia Byzantina (Budapest 1967), pp. 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, Byzantinoturcica2 (Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten, 10–11, 2 vols., Berlin, 1958).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, Byzantium and the Magyars, trans. Rosenbaum, S. R., rev. trans. Szegedy-Maszák, Mihály, rev. Miklós Szenczi, Zsigmond Ritoók (Amsterdam, 1970).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, 1958, Byzantinoturcica I, Die byzantinischen Quellen der Geschichte der Türkvölker, II, Sprachreste der Türkvölker in den byzantinischen Quellen, 2nd edition (Berlin).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Julius (Gyula), “Zur Geschichte der Onoguren,” Ungarische Jahrbücher, X (1930), 53–90.Google Scholar
Mori, Masao, “Iwayuru ‘Hoku-Tei-Rei’ ‘Sei-Tei-Rei’ ni tsuite,” Takigawa Hakase Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, vol. i: Tōyōshi hen, 1957.Google Scholar
Mori, Masao, “Kyōdo no Kokka,” Shigaku Zasshi, vol. 59, No. 5 (May, 1950).Google Scholar
Mori, Masao, “On ‘Die 24 Ta-ch'en’ of Professor Pritsak,” [In Japanese] Shigaku Zasshi, Vol. 80, No. 1 (Jan., 1971).Google Scholar
Mori, Masao, 1965, “On Chi-li-fa, Eltäbär/Eltäbir and Chichin (Irkin) of the T'ieh-lê tribes,” Acta Asiatica 9, pp. 31–6.Google Scholar
Mori, Masao, 1967, Historical Studies of the Ancient Turkic Peoples, I (Tokyo). [In Japanese, with English titles and summaries].Google Scholar
Moriyasu, Takao, “Uiguru to Toban no Hokutei sōdatsusen oyobi sono nochino Seiiki jōsei ni tsuite” (The Uyghur–Tibetan struggle for Beshbalygh and the subsequent situation in Central Asia), The Toyo Gakuho 55.4: 60–87 (1973).Google Scholar
Moshkova, M. G., 1963, Pamjatniki prokhorvskoj kul ' tury [Sites of the Prokhorovka Culture] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Moshkova, M. G., 1974, Proiskhozhdenie rannesarmatskoj (prokhorovskoj) kul ' tury [The Origins of Early Sarmatian (Prokhorovka) Culture] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Mošin, V., “Les Khazares et les Byzantins d'après l'anonyme de Cambridge,” Byzantion, 6 (1931), pp. 309–25.Google Scholar
Mošin, V., “Rus' i Khazarija pri Svjatoslave,” Seminarium Kondakovianum, 6 (1933).Google Scholar
Moskalenko, A. A., “Slavjano-vengerskie otnošenija v ix v. i drevnerusskoe naselenie srednego i verkhnego Dona,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ungrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1944, “Early Man and Pleistocene Stratigraphy in Southern and Eastern Asia,” Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnography, vol. xix, No. 3.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1953, “Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Sites in Soviet Central Asia,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 94, No. 4, pp. 383–421.Google Scholar
Movsēs, Daskhurantsʿi, The History of the Caucasian Albanians by Movsēs Dasxuranci, trans. Dowsett, C.J.F. (London, 1961).Google Scholar
Movsēs, Daskhurants'i, Patmut'iwn Ałuanits': Movsisi Kałankatuats'woy Patmut'iwn Ałuanits' asharhi, ed. Emin, M. (Moskva, 1860, reprint: Tiflis, 1912).Google Scholar
Mozolev'skij, B. M., 1979, Tovstva Mogila [The Tovsta Burial Mound] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Mujmal al-Tavārīkh (“Compendium of the Histories”), ed. Bahār, M. (Tehran, 1939).Google Scholar
Mujmal al-Tawārīkh, ed. Bahār, M. (Tehran, 1318/1939).Google Scholar
Mukhamedova, R. G., Tatary-Mišari (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B. N., 1967, The Kushana Genealogy (Calcutta).Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K., “Uigurica II,” Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 3: 1–110 (1910).Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K., “Ein Doppelblatt aus einem manichäischen Hymnenbuch (Maḥrnâmag),” Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 5: 1–40 (1912).Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K., “Der Hofstaat eines Uiguren-Königs,” Festschrift Vilhelm Thomsen zur Vollendung des siebzigsten Lebensjahres am 25 Januar (Leipzig, 1912), pp. 207–13.Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K., “Zwei Pfahlinschriften aus den Turfanfunden,” Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 3: 1–38 (1915).Google Scholar
Müneccimbaṣt Ṣeyh Ahmed Dede Efendi'nin “Cami' üd-Düvel” adli eserinden: Karahanltlar, Turk, trans. Lugal, N. (Istanbul, 1940).Google Scholar
Münejjimbashï, : text available only in Turkish translations: Ṣaḥāʾif al-Akhbār, Turk. trans. Nedim, Aḥmed, 3 vols. (Istanbul, 1285/1868), 11.Google Scholar
Murayama, S., 1975, “Der Zusammenhang der Kitan-Schrift mit der türkischen Runenschrift,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Congress of Orientalists, edited by Zeki Velidi Togan, vol. 2, pp. 386–98 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Murphey, Rhoads, 1961, An Introduction to Geography (Chicago).Google Scholar
Murzaev, E. M., 1954, Die Mongolische Volksrepublik: Physisch-geographische Beschreibung, translated from the Russian (Gotha).Google Scholar
Murzaev, E. M., 1958, Srednjaja Azija (Moscow).Google Scholar
Murzaev, E. M., 1966, Priroda Sin'czjana i formirovanie pustyn' Central'noj Azii, (Moscow).Google Scholar
Nagrodzka-Majchrzyk, Teresa, 1978, Geneza miast u dawnych ludów tureckich (VII– XII w.) (Polska Akademia Nauk). [French summary: “La genèse des villes chez les anciens peuples turcs,” pp. 144–8].Google Scholar
Nagy, T., 1947–8, “Studia Avarica,” [in Hungarian!] Antiquitas Hungarica I, pp. 56–63; II, PP. 131–49.Google Scholar
Namdak, Tenzin, 1966, Mdzod phug: basic verses and commentary by Dran-pa nammhha' (Delhi) [Tibetan text only].Google Scholar
Narain, A. K., 1962, The Indo-Greeks (Oxford 1962).Google Scholar
Narain, A. K., 1969, “The Early Movement of the Sakas and the Pahlavas,” Studies in Asian History, Proceedings of the Asian History Congress 1961, pp. 62–76 (Delhi).Google Scholar
Narain, A. K., 1987, On the “First” Indo-Europeans. The Tokharian – Yuezhi and their Chinese Homeland, Papers on Inner Asia, No. 2, Indiana University Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
Nejkhardt, A. A., 1982, Skifskij rasskaz Gerodota v otechestvennoj istoriografii [The Scythian Account of Herodotus in Soviet historiography] (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, (editor), 1940a (reprinted 1986) Attila és húnjai (Budapest). [Still very useful].Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, 1940bA húnok nyelve,” in Németh, 1940a, pp. 217–26.Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, 1930. A honfoglaló magyarság kialakulása (Budapest).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A magyar rovásírás,” A Magyar Nyelvtudomány Kézikönyve, II (1934).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A magyar népnév, a magyar törzsnevek, a kazár népnév,” Magyar Nyelv, XXXIV (1938).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A baskírföldi magyar őshazáról,” Élet és Tudomány, 13 (1966).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, A honfoglaló magyarság kialakulása (Budapest, 1930).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “Die Petschenegischen Stammesnamen,” Ungarische Jahrbücher. 10 (1930), pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “Die Volksnamen quman und qūnKőrösi Csoma Archivum, 3 (1940). pp. 95–109.Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, Die Inschriften des Schatzes von Nagy-Szent-Miklós (Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica, 2, Budapest, 1932).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “The Runiform Inscriptions from Nagy-Szent-Miklós and the Runiform Scripts of Eastern EuropeActa Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 21 (1971).Google Scholar
Németh, Julius (Gyula), “Ungarische Stammesnamen bei den Baschkiren,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 16 (1966).Google Scholar
Németh, Julius (Gyula), “Zur Kenntnis der Petschenegen,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum. I (1921–5) pp. 219–25.Google Scholar
Németh, Péter, “Obrazovanie pogranično ĭ oblasti Boržavy,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.) Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Neshrī, , Kitab-i Cihan-nüma, ed. Unat, F. R., Köymen, M. A., 2 vols. (Ankara, 1949–57).Google Scholar
Niẓām, al-Mulk, Siyāsat-Nāmah, ed. Qazwīnī, M., Chahārdihī, M. (Tehran, 1334/1956).Google Scholar
Niẓām, al-Mulk, The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, trans. Darke, H. (London, 1960).Google Scholar
Nikophoros, Patriarkhos, Nicephori Archiepiscopi Constantinopolitani opuscula historica, ed. Boer, C. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana: Scriptores Graeci, Leipzig, 1880, reprint, 1975).Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Th., 1879, Geschichte der Perser und Araber zur Zeit der Sasaniden. Aus der arabischen Chronik des Tabari übersetzt (Leiden).Google Scholar
Novgorodova, E. A., 1969, Central'naja Azija i Karasukskaja problema (Moskva).Google Scholar
Nowgorodowa, Eleonora, 1980, Alte Kunst der Mongolei, (Leipzig). An archeological approach to the history of Mongolia from the Paleolithic to the end of the Türk empire.Google Scholar
Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou, M., 1970, Συμβολή єίς τηʾν χφουολο'γησιν τῶν Ἀβαο̧ινῶυ καὶ Σλαβικῶν ἐπὶδο̧оμῶν (582–602), Symmeikta 2, pp. 145–205.
Obermiller, E., 1932, History of Buddhism by Bu-ston (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Ögel, Bahaeddin, Islâamiyetten önce Türk kültür tarihi (“The History of Pre-Islamic Turkic Culture”) (Türk Tarih Kurumu Yaymlarmdan, VII series, 42, Ankara, 1962).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1946, 1950, 1955, Lenskie drevnosti, i, ii, iii, (Jakutsk; vol. iii, Leningrad).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1949a, “Issledovanija must'erskoj stojanki i pogrebenija neandertal'ca v grote Teshik-Tash Juzhnyj Uzbekistan (Srednjaja Azija),” in: Teshik-Tash (Moskva), pp. 7–85.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1949b, Istorija Jakutii (Jakutsk), 2nd edition Moskva 1955. [See also English version, 1970].Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1950, Neolit i bronzovyj vek Pribajkal'ja, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR. 18.
Okladnikov, A. P., 1951, “Novye dannye po drevnejshej istorii Mongolii,” VD1, 1951, 4, pp. 162–74.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1954, “Olennyj kamen' s r. Ivolgi,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija. 19, pp. 207–20.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1956, “Ancient Cultures and Cultural and Ethnic Relations on the Pacific Coast of North Asia,” Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Congress of Americanists (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1956, 1957, “Iz istorii êtnicheskikh i kul'turnykh svjazej neoliticheskikh piemen srednego Eniseja,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija 1957, 1. pp. 26–55.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1959a, Dalekoe proshloe Primor'ja (Vladivostok).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1959b, “Tripody za Bajkalom,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija 1959, 3, pp. 114–36.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1959c, Ancient Populations of Siberia and its Cultures, Russian Translation Series of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. i (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1961, “Khodzhikentskaja peshchera – novyj pamjatnik Uzbekistana,” Kratkie soobshchenija Instituta arkheologii Ak. nauk SSSR 82, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1962, “Paleoliticheskie nakhodki v rajone Orok-Nor,” Materialy po istorii i filologii Central'noj Azii (Ulan-Udê), Serija vostokovedenija vyp. 8, pp. 169–75. [English version: Okladnikov, 1965b.].Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1963, Drevnee poselenie na poluostrove Peschanom u Vladivostoka, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 112.
Okladnikov, A. P., 1964a, “K voprosu drevnejshej istorii Mongolii. Pervobytnaja Mongolija,” Studia Archaeologica (Ulan Bator) t. 3, fasc. 8.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1964b, O pervonachal'nom zaselenii chelovekom Sibiri i novykh nakhodkakh paleolita na reke Zee (Moskva). English version published simultaneously in Moscow: The Peopling [sic!] of Siberia and New Paleolithic Finds at the Zea River..Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1965a, Petroglify Angary (Moskva–Leningrad).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1965b, “Paleolithic Finds in the Region of Orok-Nor,” Arctic Anthropology, 3, No. 1, pp. 142–5. [See Above, 1962].Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1966, “K voprosu o mezolite i êpipaleolite aziatskoj chasti SSSR,” in Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR. 126.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., “Arkheologija Doliny Zei i Srednego Amura,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1966, 1, pp. 32–41.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1966b, “Drevnee poselenie na r. Tadushi u der. Ustinovka i problema dal'nevostochnogo mezolita (v svjazi i raskopkami 1964 g.),” in: Chetvertichnyj period Sibiri, (Moskva), pp. 352–72.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1966c, “Poselenie u s. Voznesenovka vblizi ust'ja r. Khungari,” Arkheologicheskie otkrytija 1966, pp. 175–8.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1966d, “Central'no-Aziatskoj ochag pervobitnogo iskusstva (k itogam Sovetsko-mongol'skoj arkheologicheskoj êkspedicii 1966 g.),” Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1966, pp. 96104.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1969a, Liki drevnego Amura (Novosibirsk).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1969b, “Ulalinka – drevnejshee paleoliticheskoe mestonakhozhdenie Sibiri,” Arkheologicheskie otkrytija, 1969, pp. 185–6.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1969c, “Ancient Cultures in the Continental Part of North-East Asia,” Actas del XXXIII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas (San José de Costa Rica).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P., 1970, Yakutia Before its Incorporation into the Russian State, Arctic Institute of North America, Anthropology of the North. Translations from Russian Sources, ditor Michael, Henry N., No. 8, (Montreal). [Translation of the second edition (1955) of Okladnikov 1949b].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P.Derevjanko, A. P., 1968, “Paleolit Dal'nego Vostoka (tipo-logija i stratigrafija),” Problemy izuchenija chetvertichnogo perioda. Tezisi (Khabarovsk).Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P.Derevjanko, A. P., 1969, “Paleolit Amura,” Izvestija Sibirskogo otdelenija AN SSSR, 1969, No. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P.Kirilov, I. I., 1968, “Paleoliticheskoe poselenie v Sokhatno (Titovskaja sopka),” Izvestija Sibirskogo Otdelenija AN SSSR, serija oshchestvennykh nauk, No. 6, pp. 111–14.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P.Troickij, S. L. 1967, “K izucheniju chetvertichnykh otlozhenij i paleolita Mongolii,” Bjulleten komissii po izucheniju chetvertichnogo perioda, No. 33, pp. 4–30.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P.Zaporozhskaja, V. D., 1970, Petroglify Zabajkal'ja, 1–11 (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Olajos, T., 1969, “Adalék a (H)ung(a)ri(i) népnév és a késői avarkori etnikum történetéhez,” Antik Tanulmányok 16, pp. 87–90.Google Scholar
Olajos, T., 1976, “La chronologie de la dynastie avare de Baian,” Revue des études byzantines, 34, pp. 151–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olajos, T., 1977, “Megjegyzések Maurikios császár avar háborujának utolsó éveihez Theophylaktos Simokattes elbeszélésében,” Acta Universitatis Szegediensis de Attila József Nominatae, Acta Historica 58, pp. 3–12. [Russian résumé].Google Scholar
Olajos, T., 1985, “Quelques remarques sur les évènements des dernières années de la guerre avaro–byzantine sous l'Empereur Maurice,” in From Late Antiquity to Early Byzantium, edited by Vavřinek, V., pp. 161–5, (Praha).Google Scholar
Olajos, T., 1979, “Theophylaktos Simokattés és történetíró elődje Menandros Protéktór’, Acta Universitatis Szegediensis de Attile József Nominata, Acta Historica, 66, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Onajko, N. A., 1966, Antychnij import v Pridneprov ' e i Pobuzh ' e v VII–V vv. do n.ê. [Ancient Imports into the Dnieper and Bug areas in the 7th to 5th centuries B.C.] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Onajko, N. A., 1970, Antychnij import v Pridneprov ' e i Pobuzh ' e v IV–III vv. do n.ê., [Ancient imports into the Dnieper and Bug Areas in the 4th to 3rd centuries B.C.] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Pais, Dezső, “A Gyula és a kündüh,” Magyar Nyelv, XXVII (1931).Google Scholar
Pais, Dezső, A magyar ősvallás nyelvi emlékeiből (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Palló, Margit K., “Hungaro-Tschuwaschica,” UA., 31 (1959), 239–58.Google Scholar
Pálóczi-Horváth, A., “Situation des recherches archéologiques sur les Comans en Hongrie,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 27 (1973), pp. 201–9.Google Scholar
Pálóczi-Horváth, A., “L'immigration et l'établissement des Comans en Hongrie,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 29 (1975) pp. 313–33.Google Scholar
Pan, Ku, Han Shu, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Parducz, M. 1941–50, Denkmäler der Sarmatenzeit in Ungarn, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vols, xxv, XXVIII, XXX.Google Scholar
Párducz, Mihály, 1959, “Archäologische Beiträge zur Geschichte der Hunnenzeit in Ungarn,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae II, pp. 309–98.Google Scholar
Párducz, Mihály, 1963, Die ethnischen Probleme der Hunnenzeit in Ungarn, Studia Archaeologica I (Budapest).Google Scholar
Pargiter, F. E., 1962, The Purāna Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age, The Chowkamba Sanskrit Studies, vol. 49 (Varanasi).Google Scholar
Parker, E. H., 1895, A Thousand Years of the Tartars, (London). An oft quoted book, to be shunned at all costs.Google Scholar
Parkhomenko, V., “Rus' i Pečenegi,’ Slavia 8 (1929–31).Google Scholar
Pashuto, V. T., Vnešnjaja politika Drevneĭ Rusi (Moskva, 1968).Google Scholar
Patkanoff, S., “Über das Volk der Sabiren,” Keleti Szemle 1 (1900), 258–77.Google Scholar
Pauler, Gy., Szilágyi, S. (ed. trans.), A magyar honfoglalás kútfői (Budapest, 1900).Google Scholar
Pauler, Gyula, A magyar nemzet története Szent Istvánig (Budapest, 1900).Google Scholar
Paulus, Diaconus, Historia Langobardorum, edited by Bethmann, and Waitz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica 1878, pp. 45–187.Google Scholar
Payne-Smith, H., 1860, The Third Part of the Ecclesiastical History of John of Ephesus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pei shih [History of the Northern Dynasties], pei-yao, Ssu-pu edition (Shanghai 1936).Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Tuomo, “On the Oldest Relationship between Hungarians and Sarmatians: From Spali to Asphali,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 45 (1973).Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1934, “Tokharien et Koutchéen,” Journal asiatique 1, pp. 23–106.Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, À propos des Comans,” Journal asiatique 1920, I, pp. 125–185.Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, Notes sur l'histoire de la Horde d'Or suivies de Quelques noms turcs d'hommes et de peuples finissant en ‘ar’ (Oeuvres Posthumes de Paul Pelliot, 11, Paris, 1949).Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1912, “La fille de Mo-tch'o qaghan et ses rapports avec Kül-tegin,” T'oung Pao 13, pp. 301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1915, “L'origine de T'ou-kiue, nom chinois des Turcs,” T'oung Pao 16, pp. 687–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1929, “Neuf notes sur des questions d'Asie Centrale,” T'oung Pao 26, pp. 201–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1961, Histoire ancienne du Tibet, Oeuvres posthumes de Paul Pelliot, Vol. 5 (Paris).Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1963, Notes on Marco Polo, II (Paris 1963).Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1913, “Sur quelques mots d'Asie Centrale,” Journal asiatique 1913, I, pp. 451–69.Google Scholar
Pelliot, Paul, 1959, 1963, Notes on Marco Polo, 2 volumes. Article “Catai,” vol. I, pp. 216–29; article “Ciorcia,” vol. I, pp. 366–90 (Paris).Google Scholar
Pengitov, N. T., Proiskhoždenie mariĭskogo naroda (Jaškar-Ola, 1967).Google Scholar
Perényi, J., “A ‘Magna Hungaria’ kérdéséhez,” Magyar Nyelv, LV (1959), pp. 385–391, 488–99.Google Scholar
Petaḥia, of Ratisbon: Travels of Rabbi Petachia of Ratisbon, ed., trans. Benisch, A. (London, 1856).Google Scholar
Petech, Luciano, 1966, “Tibet,” in Geschichte Mittelasiens, pp. 311–47.Google Scholar
Petech, Luciano, 1939, A Study on the Chronicles of Ladakh, Indian Tibet (Calcutta).Google Scholar
Petech, Luciano, 1946, “Alcuni nomi geografici nel La-dvags-rgyal-rabs,” RSO xxii (Rome 1947), 1–10.Google Scholar
Petrenko, V. G., 1967, Pravoberezh ' e Srednego Pridneprov ' ja v V–III do n.ê [The Right Bank of the Middle Dnieper in the 5th to 3rd centuries B.C.] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Petrenko, V. G., 1978, Ukrashenija Skifii v VII–III vv. do n.ê [Ornaments of Scythia in the 7th to 3rd Centuries B.C.] Arkheologija SSSR. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, D 4–5 (Moscow).Google Scholar
Petrov, K. I., Očerk proiskhoždenija kirgizskogo naroda (Frunze, 1963).Google Scholar
Petrov, M. P., 1966, Pustyni Central'noj Azii, 2 volumes (Moscow).Google Scholar
Petrov, M. P., 1973, Pustyni Zemnogo Shara (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Petruševskij, I. P., “Pokhod mongol'skikh vojsk v Srednjuju Aziju v 1219–1224 gg. i ego posledstvija,” Tataro-Mongoly v Azii i Evrope, ed. Tikhvinskiĭ, S. L. (Moskva, 1970).Google Scholar
Pigulevskaja, N., 1941, Sirijskie istochniki po istorii narodov SSSR, Trudy Instituta vostokovedenija vol XLI. (Moskva).Google Scholar
Pigulevskaja, N., 1946, Vizantija i Iran v rubezhe IV i VII vekov (Moskva–Leningrad).Google Scholar
Pigulevskaja, N. V., Siriĭskie istočniki po istorii narodov SSSR (Moskva–Leningrad, 1941).Google Scholar
Pigulevskaya, N., 1969, “Notes sur les relations de Byzance et des Huns au VIe s.,” Revue des études sud-est européennes 7, pp, 199–203.Google Scholar
Pinks, Elisabeth, 1968, Die Uiguren von Kan-chou in der frühen Sung-Zeit (960–1028), Asiatische Forschungen 24, (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Piotrovskij, B. B., 1954, “Skify i Drevnij Vostok” [The Scythians and the Ancient East], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 19.Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., (Editor), 1981, Stepi Êvrazii v êpokhu srednevekov'ja, (Moscow). An archeological approach to the history of Inner Asia from the 5th to the 14th century.Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., Pečenegi, torki i polovci v juznorusskikh stepjakh (Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 62, Moskva-Leningrad, 1958).Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., Ot kočeviĭ k gorodam (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., “Ob etničeskoĭ neodnorodnosti naselenija severo-zapadnogo khazarskogo pogranič'ja,” in Janin, V. L. (ed.), Novoe v Arkheologii (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., Drevnosti černykh klobukov (Svod Arkheologičeskikh Istorikov, El–19, Moskva, 1973).Google Scholar
Pletneva, S. A., Khozary (Moskva, 1976).Google Scholar
Pogrebova, N. N., 1958, “Pozdneskifskie gorodishcha na Nizhnem Dnepre” [Late Scythian Sites in the Lower Dnieper Area], Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR, 64, pp. 103–247.Google Scholar
Pogrebova, N. N., 1961, “Pogrebenija v mavzolee Neapolja skifskogo” [Burials in the Mausoleum at Scythian Neapolis], Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR, 96, pp. 103–213.Google Scholar
Pokrovskaja, E. F., 1955, “Melitopol'skij skifskij kurgan” [The Melitopol Scythian Kurgan], VDI, 2, pp. 191–9.Google Scholar
Polovoĭ, N. Ja., “O maršrute pokhoda russkikh na Berdaa i russko-khazarskikh otnošenijakh v 943 g., “Vizantiĭski˘ Vremennik 25 (1961).Google Scholar
Ponomarev, A. L., “Kuman-polovcy,” Vestnik Drevneĭ Istorii 3–4 (1940).Google Scholar
Popov, A. I., “Burtasy i mordva,” UZLGU no. 105, serija vostokovedčeskikh nauk z, 1948.Google Scholar
Popov, A. N., “Kipč;aki i Rus',” UZLGU set. istor nauk. 14 (1949).Google Scholar
Popović, V., 1975, “Les témoins archéologiques des invasions avaro–slaves dans l'Illyricum byzantin,” Mélanges d'Archéologie et d'Histoire de l'Ecole Française de Rome 87, pp. 445–504.Google Scholar
Potapov, L. P., Êtničeskiĭ sostav i proiskhoždenie Altaicev (Leningrad, 1969).Google Scholar
Potratz, A. H., 1963, Die Skythen in Südrussland (Basel).Google Scholar
PoundsNorman, J.G. Norman, J.G., 1961, “Land Use on the Hungarian Plains,” in Pounds, Norman J. G. (editor), Geographical Essays on Eastern Europe, Indiana University Russian and East European Series vol. 24, pp. 54–74 (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar
Pridik, E. M., 1914, “Mel'gunovskij klad 1763 g.” [The Melgun Treasure of 1763], Materialy po arkheologii Rossii (St. Petersburg).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Karachanidische Streitfragen,” Oriens, 3 (1950), pp. 17–68.Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Von den Karluk zu den Karachaniden,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 101 (1951).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Āl-i Burhān,” Der Islam, 30 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritsak, O., “The Decline of the Empire of the Oghuz Yabghu,” The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the United States, 2.2 (1952).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Der Untergang des Reiches des Oġuzischen Yabġu,” Fuad Köprülü Armaǧani (İstanbul, 1953).Google Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Die Karachaniden,” Der Islam, 31 (1953–4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritsak, O., “Qara. Studien zur türkischen Rechtssymbolik,” Symbolae in Honorem, Z.V. Togan (Istanbul, 1950–5).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, 1954, “Die 24 T'a-chên. Studie zur Geschichte des Verwaltungsaufbaus der Hsiung-nu Reiche,” Oriens Extremus 1, pp. 178–202.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, 1982, “The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan,” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 6, pp. 428–76. [Cf. on the same topic Doerfer 1973].Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, 1982, “The Slavs and the Avars,” Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull'alto medioevo xxx, Gli Slavi occidentali e meridionali nell'alto medioevo, pp. 353–435 (Spoleto).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Bolgaro-Tschuwaschica,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher., 31 (1959), 274–314.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “From the Säbirs to the Hungarians,” in Káldy-Nagy, Gy. (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, Die bulgarische Fürstenliste und die Sprache der Protobulgaren (Ural-Altaische Bibliothek, 1, Wiesbaden, 1955).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Yowār und K聉βαρ Kāwar,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher., 36 (1964).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Polovtsiana, 1–2,” Reşid Rahmeti Arat için, ed. Ergin, M. (Ankara, 1966).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Non-‘Wild’ Polovtsians,” To Honor Roman Jakobson, 2 vols. (The Hague–Paris 1967), II. pp. 1615–23.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “The Pechenegs. A Case of Social and Economic Transformation,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “The Polovcians and the Rus',” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 2 (1982), pp. 321–380.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, 1954, “Stammesnamen und Titulaturen der altaischen Völker,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 24, pp. 49–104.Google Scholar
,Procopius of Caesarea, History of the Wars (1914) edited and translated by Dewing, H. B., vol. I, (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Prokopios, , De Bello Gothico, ed. Dindorf, W. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1883–1838).Google Scholar
Prušek, J., 1971, Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the Period 1400–300 B.C. (Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Pugachenkova, G. A., 1966, “Diskussii o ‘Sotera Megase’,” Trudy Gosudarstvennyj Universitet Tashkent 295, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., 1963, “The Consonantal System of Old Chinese, Pt. II. Appendix: The Hsiung-nu Language,” Asia Major New Series. 9, pp. 239–65.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., 1970, “The Wusun and Sakas and the Yüeh-chih Migration,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 33, pp. 154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., 1966, “Chinese and lndo-Europeans,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp 9–39.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., 1981, “Han China in Central Asia,” International History Review 3, pp. 278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G.A Sogdian colony in Inner Mongolia,” T'oung Pao. 41: 317–56 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G.Some remarks on the Toquzoghuz problem,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. 28: 35–42 (1956).Google Scholar
Puri, B. N., 1965, India under the Kushanas (Bombay).Google Scholar
Rachewiltz, Igor, Papal Envoys to the Great Khans (Stanford, 1971).Google Scholar
Rachewiltz, Igor, 1974, “Some Remarks on the Khitan Clan Name Yeh-lü – I-la,” Papers on Far Eastern History 9, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Radloff, W., Die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, 3 vols. (Saint Petersburg, 1894–5).Google Scholar
Raevskij, D. S., 1977, Ocherki ideologii skifo-sakskikh piemen [Essays on the ideology of Scytho-Sacian Tribes] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Ramstedt, G. J., “Zwei uigurische Runeninschriften in der Nord-Mongolei,” Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne. 30.3: 1–63 (1913).Google Scholar
Rand, Christopher C., 1979, “Chinese Military Thought,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 39, pp. 120–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranov, V. A., 1970, “Galechnaja tekhnika v kul'turakh kamennogo veka Sibiri i Srednej Azii,” in: Sibir' i ee sosedi v drevnosti, edited by Larichev, V. E. (Novosibirsk), pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, “Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörte im Tscheremissischen,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. lxvii (1920).Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, Uralaltaische Wortforschungen (Studia Orientalia edidit Societas Orientalis Fennica, xviii: 3, Helsinki, 1955).Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, “Gibt es im Baschkirischen etwas Ugrisches,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 12 (1960), 73–8.Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Jāmi' al-Tawārīkh ed. Romaskevich, A. A., Khetagurov, A. A., Ali-zade, A. A., vol. I/I (Moskva, 1965).Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Sbornik letopiseĭ, Russ. trans. Khetagurov, A. A., vol. I/I (Moskva–Leningrad, 1952).Google Scholar
Rashīd, al-Dīn, Die Geschichte der Oġuzen des Rashīd ad-Dīn, Germ, trans. Jahn, K. (Wien, 1969).Google Scholar
Rásonyi, László, “Başkurt ve Macar yurtlanndaki ortak coğrafî adlar üzerine,” X Türk Dil Kurultayinda Okunan Bilimsel Bildiriler, 1963 (Ankara, 1964).Google Scholar
Rásonyi, László, “Der Volksname Berendey,” Seminarium Kondakovianum VI (1933).Google Scholar
Rásonyi, László, “Contributions à l'histoire des premières cristallisations d'état des Roumains. L'origine des Basarabas,” Archivum Europae Centro-Orientalis, I (1935).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Pečenegi, torki i berendeĭ na Rusi i v Ugrii,” Seminarium Kondakovianum 6 (1933).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Polovcy,” Seminarium Kondakovianum 7 (1935), 8 (1936), 9 (1937), 10 (1938), 11 (1940).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Les Comans et Byzance,” Actes du IVe Congrès International des Études Byzantines (Bulletin de l'Institut Archéologique Bulgare, ix, Sofia, 1935).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Khinova,” Seminarium Kondakovianum, 8 (1936).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Tūlkoviny,” Seminarium Kondakovianum, 8 (1936).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Rus' i kočevniki v êpokhu Svjatogo Vladimira,” Vladimirskiĭ Sbornik v pamyat' 950-letija Kreščenija Rusi (Belgrad, 1938).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Rol' polovcev v voĭnakh Aseneĭ c vizantiĭskoĭ i latinskoĭ imperijami v 1118–1207 godakh,” Spisanie na Bŭlgarskata Akademija na Naukite 58 (1939).Google Scholar
Rasovskiĭ, D. A., “Rus', černye klobuki i Polovcy v XII' v.,” Izvestija na Bŭlgarskoto Istoričesko Družestvo 16–18, Sbornik v pamet' prof. Petŭr Nikov (Sofija, 1940).Google Scholar
Ravennatis anonymi Cosmographia, ed. Schnetz, J. (Itineraria Romana, 11, Leipzig, 1940).Google Scholar
Rédei, K., Die syrjänischen Lehnwörter im Wogulischen (Budapest, 1970).Google Scholar
Reichelt, Hans, 1931, Die sogdischen Handschriftenreste des Britischen Museums, ii. Die nicht-buddhistischen Texte (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean, 1965, Simon de Saint-Quentin. Histoire des Tartares (Paris).Google Scholar
Richardson, Hugh E., 1952, Ancient Historical Edicts at Lhasa and the Mu Tsung/ Khri Gtsug Lde Brtsan Treaty of A.D. 821–822 from the Inscription at Lhasa, Prize Publication Fund, Vol. 19 (London).Google Scholar
Richardson, Hugh E., 1954, “A Ninth Century Inscription from Rkon-po,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp. 157–73.Google Scholar
Richardson, Hugh E., 1957, “A Tibetan Inscription from Rgyal-lha-khan, and a Note on Tibetan Chronology from A.D. 841 to A.D. 1042,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp. 57–78.Google Scholar
Richardson, Hugh E., 1971, “Who was Yum-brtan,” Études Tibétaines dédiées à la mémoire de Marcelle Lalou, pp. 433–9 (Paris).Google Scholar
Rikman, E. A., 1975, Pamjatniki sarmatov i piemen chernjakhovskoj kul ' tury [Sites of the Sarmatians and of the Tribes of the Chernjakhiv Culture] (Kishinev).Google Scholar
Roerich, George N., 1930, The Animal Style among the Nomad Tribes of Northern Tibet (Prague).Google Scholar
Roerich, George N., 1931, “Problems of Tibetan Archaeology,” Urusvati Journal I, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Roerich, George N., 1949–53, The Blue Annals, 2 vols., Royal Asiatic Society, Monograph Series Vol. VII (Calcutta).
Rohan-Csermak, Géza, “La patrie primitive des Finno-Ougriens sous l'aspect ethnologique,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 41 (1969), 265–72.Google Scholar
Róheim, G., Hungarian and Vogul Mythology (Monographs of the American Ethnological Society, xxiii, 1954).Google Scholar
Róheim, G., “A kazár nagyfejedelem és a Turulmonda,” Ethnographia, xxviii (1917).Google Scholar
Róheim, G., “A kazár és magyar nagyfejedelem,” Ethnographia, xxix (1918).Google Scholar
Rolle, Renate, 1979, Totenkult der Skythen, I–II, Vorgeschichtliche Forschungen Bd. 18 (Berlin–New York).Google Scholar
Rolle, Renate, 1980, Die Welt der Skythen (Luzern, Frankfurt a.M.).Google Scholar
Romodin, V. M. (ed.), Materialy po istorii Kirgizov i Kirgizii, vyp. I (Moskva, 1973).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A., “A bolgár-török permi érintkezések néhány kérdése,” Nyelvtu-dományi Közlemények, 77 (1975).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A., “A permi nyelvek őspermi bolgár-török jövevényszavai,” Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 74 (1973).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A., 1955, “Social Terms in the List of Grants of the Tibetan Tun-huang Chronicle,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, pp. 249–70.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András, – Fodor, S., Epigraphica Bulgarica. A volga bolgár-török feliratok (Studia Uralo-Altaica, i, Szeged, 1973).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András, “Some Volga Bulgarian Words in the Volga Kipchak Languages,” in Káldy-Nagy, Gy. (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976), pp. 169–75.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András, 1982, “A kazár népnévről,” Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 84, pp. 349–80.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, John M., 1967, The Dynastic Arts of the Kushans (Berkeley–Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Roska, Martin von, 1937, “Der Bestand der skytischen Altertümer Siebenbürgens,” Eurasia Septentrionalis Antiqua, 11, pp. 167–203.Google Scholar
Rossabi, Morris, 1970, “The Tea and Horse Trade with Inner Asia During the Ming,” Journal of Asian History 4, pp. 136–68.Google Scholar
Rostovcev, M. I. 1918, Ellinstvo i iranstvo ne juge Rossii [Hellenism and Iranism in South Russia], (Petrograd) = Rostovcev 1922.Google Scholar
Rostovcev, M. I. 1922 [Rostovtzef], Iranians and Greeks in South Russia, (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rostovcev, M. I. 1925, Skifija i Bospor (Leningrad). = Rostovcev 1931.Google Scholar
Rostovcev, M. I. 1931, Skythien und der Bosporus. 1, Kritische Übersicht der schriftlichen und archäologischen Quellen (Berlin).Google Scholar
Roux, J. P. 1962, “La religion des Turcs de l'Orkhon des VIIe et VIIIe siè;cles,” Revue de l'histoire des religions, 161, pp. 1–24, 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudenko, S. I., 1969, Die Kultur der Hsiung-nu und die Hügelgräber von Noin Ula, Antiquitas Reihe 3, Band 7, (Bonn). An improved version of the Russian original published in 1962.Google Scholar
Rudenko, S. I., There is no proof that the Noin Ula site belonged to the Hsiung-nu. 1970, Frozen Tombs of Siberia, the Pazyryk Burials of Iron Age Horsemen, (University of California Press).Google Scholar
Rudenko, S. I. 1947, Drevnjaja kul'tura Beringova morja i êskimosskaja problema (Moskva–Leningrad). [English translation: 1961].Google Scholar
Rudenko, S. I. 1961, The Ancient Culture of the Bering Sea and the Eskimo Problem, translated by Tolstoy, Paul. Arctic Institute of North America, Anthropology of the North. Translation from Russian Sources, editor Michael, Henry N., No. 1 (Montreal).Google Scholar
Rudenko, S. I., Baškiry. Istoriko-etnografičeskie očerki (Moskva-Leningrad, 1975).Google Scholar
Rusu, M., 1975, “Avars, Slavs, Romanic Population in the 6th–8th Centuries,” in Relations Between the Autochtonous Population and the Migratory Populations on the Territory of Romania edited by Constantinescu, M. et al., pp. 123–153 (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Rutkivs'ka, L. M., 1969, “Kochovki ta zemlerobi na territorii stepovoj Ukraini v seredini I tysjacholittja n.ê” [Nomads and Agriculturalists on the Territory of the Ukrainian Steppes in the Middle of the 1st Millenium A.D.], Arkheologija (Kiev), 22, pp. 149–60.Google Scholar
Rybakov, B. A., 1979, Gerodotova Skifija [The Scythia of Herodotus] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
S̆čerbak, A. M., “Neskol'ko slov o priemakh čtenija runičeskikh nadpiseĭ naĭdennykh na Oonu,” Sovetskaja Arkheologija 19 (1954).Google Scholar
S̆čerbak, A. M., “Znaki na Keramiki i kirpičakh iz Sarkela-Beloĭ Vežy,” Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR No. 75 (1959).Google Scholar
S̆čerbak, A. M., “Les inscriptions inconnues sur pierres de Khoumara (au Caucase du Nord) et le problè;me de l'alphabet runique des Turcs Occidentaux,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 15 (1962).Google Scholar
S̆ekera, I. M., Mižanarodni zv'jazk kiĭvs' koï Rusi (Kiĭv, 1963).Google Scholar
Safargaliev, M. G., “Zametka o burtasakh,” Učenye Zapiski Mordovskogo Naučno-Issledovatel' skogo Instituta Jazyka, Literajury i Istorii 13 (1951).Google Scholar
Saguchi, Tōm, “Kaikotsu den” (The biographies of the Uighurs), in Tōru, Saguchi, Nobuo, Yamada and Masao, Mori, Kiba minzoku shi, 2, Seishi hokuteki den (The history of horse-riding peoples 2; the biographies of the northern races in the standard histories; Tōyō bunko 223; Tokyo, 1972), pp. 299–462.Google Scholar
Sallaville, S., “Un peuple de race turque christianisé au XIIIe siècle: Les Comans,” Echos d'Orient 18 (1914).Google Scholar
Samolin, W., East Turkistan to the Twelfth Century (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
San Kuo chih [Memoirs of the Three Kingdoms] compiled by Shou, Ch'en, pen, Po na edition (Taipei 1967), Wei Chih 3: 6a; Cf. Zürcher 1968, p. 371.Google Scholar
Šanijazov, K.S̆., K êtničeskoĭ istorii uzbekskogo naroda (Istoriko-êtnografičeskie istedovanija na materialakh kipčakskogo komponenta) (Taškent, 1974).Google Scholar
Schafer, Edward H., 1963, The Golden Peaches of Samarkand. A Study in T'ang Exotics, (University of California Press).Google Scholar
Schechter, S., “An Unknown Khazar Document”, Jewish Quarterly Review, new series, 3 (1912).Google Scholar
Schlegel, G., 1896, Die chinesische Inschrift auf dem uigurischen Denkmal in Kara Balgassun, Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne, v.
Schlegel, Gustav, “Die chinesische Inschrift auf dem uigurischen Denkmal in Kara Balgassun,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. 9: I–XV, 1–141 (1896).Google Scholar
Schlumberger, Daniel, 1952–1964, “Le temple de Surkh Khotal en Bactriane,” Journal asiatique 1952, pp. 433–53; 1954, PP. 161–205; 1955, pp. 269–80; 1964, pp. 303–26.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, Daniel, 1961, “The Excavations of Surkh Khotal and the Problem of Hellenism in Bactria and India,” Proceedings of the British Academy 47, pp. 77–95.Google Scholar
Schönebaum, H., “Die Kenntnis der byzantinischen Geschichts schreiber von der ältesten Geschichte der Ungarn vor der Landnahme,” Ungarische Bibliothek, first series, 5 (Berlin–Leipzig, 1922).Google Scholar
Schönebaum, H., “Zur Kabarenfrage,” Aus der byzantinistischen Arbeit der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik I (Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten 5, Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
Sebestyén, Irén N., “Zur Frage des alten Wohngebietes der uralischen Völker,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 1 (1951–2).Google Scholar
Senigova, T. N., “Voprosy ideologii i kul'tov Semireč'ja (VI–VII vv.),” Novoe v Arkheologii Kazakhstana, ed. Kadyrbaev, M. K. (Alma-Ata, 1968).Google Scholar
Senigova, T. N., Srednevekovyi Taraz (Alma-Ata, 1972).Google Scholar
Serebrennikov, B. A., K voprosu o svjazi baškirskogo jazyka s vengerskim (Ufa, 1963).Google Scholar
Serie, A.Lateinische Namen bis 900, Bd. 1, 1977.Google Scholar
Serie, B.Griechische Namen bis 1025, Bd. I,1980.Google Scholar
Serruys, Henry, 1975, Sino-Mongol Relations during the Ming. III, Trade Relations: The Horse Fairs (1400–1600), Mélanges chinois et bouddhiques xvii (Bruxelles).Google Scholar
Serruys, Henry, 1955, Sino-Jürched Relations during the Yung-lo Period (1403–1424), Göttinger Asiatische Forschungen vol. 4 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Sertkaya, Osman F., 1977, “Probleme der köktürkischen Geschichte: Muss es ‘Inel kagan’ oder ‘Ini il kagan’ heissen?,” Materialia Turcica, 3, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar
Shakabpa, Tsepon W. D., 1967, Tibet. A Political History (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., Uzbeki-Karluki, istoriko-êtnografičeskij očerk (Tashkent, 1964).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., “Uzy”, Obšcestvennye Nauki v Uzbekistane (1970), No. 2.Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., “K voprusu rasselenija i rodovykh delenii Kangly,” in Ziiaev, Kh. Z. (ed.), Êtnografičeskoe izučenie byta i kul'tury Uzbekov (Tashkent, 1972).Google Scholar
Shaniiazov, K. Sh., K êtnicheskoj istorii uzbekskogo naroda (lstoriko-êtnografičeskoe issledovanie na materialakh kipčakskogo komponenta) (Tashkent, 1974).Google Scholar
Shavkunov, E. V., 1968, Gosudarstvo Bokhai i pamjatniki ego kul'tury v Primor'e (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Shaw, R. B., “A Grammar of the Language of Eastern Turkistan” Part I, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Bengal, 1877.Google Scholar
Shelov, D. B., 1965, “Car Atei” [King Atheas], Numizmatika i sfragistika (Kiev), 2, pp. 16–40.Google Scholar
Shih chi, by Ch'ien, Ssu-ma [145–86 B.C.?], Chapter 123, pei-yao, Ssu-pu edition, vols. 46–48. Cf. Watson 1961.Google Scholar
Shilov, B. P., 1961, “Raskopki Elizabetovskogo mogil'nika v 1959 g.” [The 1959 Excavations of the Elizavetovskij burial], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1961, 1, pp. 150–68.Google Scholar
Shiratori, Kurakichi, Hsiung-nu Min-tsu K'ao, translated into Chinese by Chienmin, Ho, Shanghai, 1936.Google Scholar
Shiratori, Kurakichi (ed.), 1912–14), Beitrdge zur historischen Geographie der Mandschurei, 2 volumes (Tokyo). [N.B. Volume I appeared in 1914 and vol. 2 in 1912!].Google Scholar
Shramko, B. A. 1962, Drevnosti Severskogo Donca [Antiquities of the Severskij Donec Area] (Kharkov).Google Scholar
Shramko, B. A. 1975, “Nekotorye itogi raskopok Bel'skogo gorodishcha i gelono-budinskaja problema” [Some results of the excavations at Belsk Gorodishche and the Geloni-Budini Problem], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1975, 1, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Shul'c, P. N. 1946, “Skul'pturnye portrety skifskikh carej” [Sculptural portraits of Scythian Kings] Kratkie soobshchenija o dokladakh i polevykh issledovanijakh Instituta istorii material'noj kul'tury, 12, pp. 44–56.Google Scholar
Shul'c, P. N. 1967, “Skifskie izvajanija Severnogo Prichernomor'ja” [Scythian Sculptures of the Northern Black Sea Area], Antichnoe obshchesvto (Moscow), pp. 225–36.Google Scholar
Sidonius, , Poems and Letters (1936), edited and translated by Anderson, W. B., vol. I (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Simokattes, Theophylaktos, Historiae, ed. Boer, C., rev. ed. Wirth, P. (Stuttgart, 1972).Google Scholar
Simson, BernhardAbel, Sigurd, 1888, 1883, Jahrbüicher des fränkischen Reiches unter Karl dem Grossen, 1–11 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1969, 2nd revised edition 1971, Inner Asia. History – Civilization – Languages. A Syllabus, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series volume 96. A very skeletal syllabus for college teaching. The first edition – printed from uncorrected proofs – should be avoided.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1957, “The Barbarians,” Diogenes 18, pp. 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1965, “Some Remarks on the Economic Aspects of Hunting in Central Eurasia,” in Die Jagd bei den altaischen Völkern, Asiatische Forschungen 26 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1975, “Horse and Pasture in Inner Asian History,” Oriens Extremus 19, pp. 171–83.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1988, “The Problem of the Ural-Altaic Relationship,” in Handbook of Uralic Studies edited by Sinor, Denis, (Leiden) 1, pp. 706–41.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1954, “Central Eurasia,” in Sinor, Denis (editor), Orientalism and History, pp. 82–103 (Cambridge), 2nd edition (Bloomington, Indiana), pp. 93–119.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1977, “Le Mongol vu par l'Occident,” 1274, Année charnière. Mutations et continuité, Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No. 558, pp. 55–72 (Paris).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1946–47, “Autour d'une migration de peuples au Ve siècle,” Journal asiatique pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1978, “The Greed of the Northern Barbarian,” in Aspects of Altaic Civilization II, edited by Clark, Larry V. and Draghi, Paul Alexander, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 134, pp. 171–82.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1963, Introduction à l'étude de l'Eurasie Centrale, (Wiesbaden) [pp. 265–267 on the Avars].Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1946–7, “Autour d'une migration de peuples au Ve siècle,” Journal asiatique, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Qapqan,” 1954, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, pp. 174–84.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Un voyageur du treizième siècle; le dominicain Julien de Hongrie,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, xiv pt. 3 (1952), 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinor, Denis, The Outlines of Hungarian Prehistory,” Cahiers d'histoire mondiale/Journal of World History, iv (1958), pp. 513–40.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Geschichtliche Hypothesen und Sprachwissenschaft in der ungarischen, finnisch-ugrischen und uralischen Urgeschichtsforschung,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher., 41 (1969), 273–81.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Autour d'une migration de peuples au Ve siècle,” Journal asiatique. 235 (1946–7) pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1981, “The Origin of Turkic balïq ‘town’,” Central Asiatic Journal 25, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1982, “The Legendary Origin of the Türks,” in: Folklorica: Festschrift for Felix J. Onias, edited by Zygas, Egle Victoria and Voorheis, Peter, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series vol. 141, pp. 223–45 (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, 1984, “Some Components of the Civilization of the Türks (6th to 8th Century, a.d.),” in: Altaistic Studies. Papers Presented at the 25th Meeting of the Permanent International Altaistic Conference at Uppsala, June 7–11, 1982, edited by Jarring, Gunnar and Staffan Rosén, Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien Konferenser 12, pp. 145–159 (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Skylitzes, loannes: Georgius Cedrenus Ioannis Scylitzae ope, ed. Bekker, J. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, 2 vols., Bonn, 1839).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Očerk drevneĭ istorii Mordvy,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo muzeja xi (Moskva, 1940).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Volžskie bulgary (TrudyGosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo Muzeja xix, Moskva, 1951).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “K voprosy o burtasakh,” Kratkie Soobščenija o Dokladakh i Polevykh Issledovanijakh Instituta Istorii Material' noĭ Kul'tury AN SSSR xl (1951).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Očerki drevneĭ i srednevekovoĭ istorii narodov Povolž'ja i Prikam'ja (Moskva, 1952).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Železnyĭ vek čuvašskogo Povolž'ja (Materialy i Issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 95, Moskva, 1961).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda po dannym arkheologii i–xv vv. n.e.,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Ob etničeskom sostave Volžskoĭ Bolgarii’, in Janin, V. L. (ed.), Novoe v arkheologii (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Les populations finnoises des bassins de la Volga et de la Kama, trans. Boyer, O. (École des languages orientales vivantes, Publications, 4rth series, vol. 8, Paris, 1898).Google Scholar
Smirnov, K. F., 1961, Vooruzhenie savromatov [The Arms of the Sauromatae] Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR, 101.
Smirnov, K. F., 1974, Savromaty [The Sauromatae] (Moscow).Google Scholar
Smirnov, K. F., 1975, Sarmaty na Ilek, [The Sarmatians on the Ilek], (Moscow).Google Scholar
Smirnov, K. F., 1977, “Savromaty i Sarmaty”, [The Sauromatae and the Sarmatians,” Problemy arkheologii Evraziii i Severnoj Ameriki, (Moscow), pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
Snellgrove, David and Richardson, Hugh, 1968, A Cultural History of Tibet (New York and Washington).Google Scholar
Soloviev, A. V., “Domination byzantine ou russe au nord de la Mer Noire à l'époque des Comnènes?,” Akten des XI Internationalen Byzantinisten-Kongres (München, 1960).Google Scholar
Sorokin, V. S., 1962 Mogil'nik bronzovoj êpokhi Tasty-butak 1 v Zapadnom Kazakhstane, Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 120.
Sós, A. Cs., 1973, “Zur Problematik der Awarenzeit in der neueren ungarischen archäologischen Forschung,” Berichte über den II. International Kongress für Slawische Archäologie 11. pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Sosnovskij, G. P., 1941, “Plitochnye mogily Zabajkal'ja,” Trudy Otdela istorii pervobytnogo obshchestva. Gos. Ermitazh, 1, pp. 273–309.Google Scholar
Sozomenos, , Ecclesiastical History, in Wace, Henry and Schaf, Philip, A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, vol. II (Oxford and New York 1891).Google Scholar
Spuler, Berthold, 1966, “Geschichte Mittelasiens seit dem Auftreten der Türken,” in Geschichte Mittelasiens, pp. 123–310.Google Scholar
Ssu-ma, Ch'ien, Shih Chi, Peking, Chung-Hua Shu-chu, 1972.Google Scholar
Ssu-ma, Kuang, Tzu-chih T'ung-chien, Ch'u-pan, Ku-chi She edition, 1957.Google Scholar
Ssu-ma, Kuang, Tzu-chih t'ung-chien (Comprehensive mirror of government), 20 vols. (Peking, 1956 ed.).Google Scholar
Staviskij, B. Ja., 1966, Mezhdu Pamirom i Kaspiem. (Srednjaja Azija v drevnosti) (Moskva).Google Scholar
Staviskij, B. Ja., 1977, Kushanskaja Baktrija: problemy istorii i kul'tury (Moskva).Google Scholar
Stebleva, I. V., 1965, Poêzija tjurkov VI–VIII vekov (Moskva).Google Scholar
Stein, Ernest, 1968, Histoire du Bas-Empire, I–II (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Stein, Ernst, 1919, Studien zur Geschichte des byzantinischen Reiches vornehmlich unter den Kaisern Justinus II und Tiberius Constantinus (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Stein, R. A., 1961, Une chronique ancienne de bSam-yas: sBa-bzed, Edition du texte tibétain et résumé français, (Publications de l'Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, Textes et documents Vol. I (Paris).Google Scholar
Stein, R. A., 1972, Tibetan Civilization, translated (from the original French) by Driver, J. E. Stapleton (London).Google Scholar
Stein, Rolf, 1940, “Leao-tche,” T'oung Pao 35, pp. 1–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, M. A. Sir, 1900, Kalhana's Rājataranginī, a Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir, translated by -, 2 vols. (Westminster). Reprinted Delhi–Varanasi, 1961.Google Scholar
Stepanov, P. D., “Burtasy i Mordva,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.) Etnogenez Mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Stratos, Andreas N., 1968–72, Byzantium in the Seventh Century, 1 (602–634), 11 (634–641) (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Sulimirski, T., 1970, The Sarmatians (London).Google Scholar
Sulimirski, T., 1981, “The Scyths,” in The Cambridge History of Iran vol. 2 (edited by Gershevitch, Ilya), pp. 149–99.Google Scholar
Sümer, F., Oǧuzlar (Ankara, 1967).Google Scholar
Sun, Shou-tao, “Hsiung-nu Hsi-ch'a-kou Wen-hua Ku-mu ch'ün ti fa-hsien,” Wen-wu, 1960: 7/8.Google Scholar
Šušarin, V. T., “Russko-vengerskie otnošenija v ix v.,” Meždunarodnye svjazi Rossii do XVII veka (Moskva, 1961.Google Scholar
Suslov, S. P., 1961, Physical Geography of Asiatic Russia, translated from the Russian by Gershevsky, Noah and edited Williams, Joseph (San Francisco).Google Scholar
Suzuki, Chusei, 1968, “China's Relations with Inner Asia: the Hsiung-nu, Tibet,” in The Chinese World Order, edited by Fairbank, John K. (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Symeon Logothetes, : Theophanes Continuatus, Ioannes Cameniata, Symeon Magister, Georgius Monachus, ed. Bekker, I. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1838).Google Scholar
Szádeczky-Kardoss, Sámuel, 1972, Ein Versuch zur Sammlung und chronologischen Anordnung der griechischen Quellen der Awarengeschichte nebst einer Auswahl von anderssprachigen Quellen (Szeged).Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1968, “Kuvrat fiának, Kubernek a története és az avarkori régészeti leletanyag,” Antik Tanulmányok 15, pp. 85–7.Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1970a, “Kutriguroi,” Realenzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, begründet, Supplementband XII, 516–20.Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1970bOnoguroi,” Realenzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, begründet, Supplementband XII, 902–6.Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1975, “Über die Wandlungen der Ostgrenze der awarischen Machtsphäre,” in Researches in Altaic Languages, edited by Ligeti, L., pp. 267–274 (Budapest).Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1978 – “Az avar történelem forrásai – Die Quellen der Awarengeschichte (Auszug),” , 105 (1978), pp. 78–90; 11, 106 (1979), pp. 94–111, 231–43; 107 (1980), pp. 86–97, 201–13; 108 (1981), pp. 81–8, 218–32; 109 (1982), pp. 136–44; 110 (1983), pp. 89–99; 111 (1984), pp. 53–70; 113 (1986), pp. 83–112. [To be continued].Google Scholar
Szádeczky–Kardoss, S., 1986, Avarica. Über die Avarengeschichte und ihre Quellen. Mit Beiträgen von Therese Olajos (Szeged).Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald, 1980, “Four Old Iranian Ethnic Names: Scythian – Skudra – Sogdian – Saka,” Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Ak. d. Wiss. Phil. -hist. Ki. 371 = Veröffentlichungen der iranischen Kommission, Bd. 9, (Wien). [On the wider geographic distribution of the Scythians].Google Scholar
Szentpétery, E. (ed.), Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Szőke, B. M., 1980, “Zur awarenzeitlichen Siedlungsgeschichte des Kőrös–Gebietes in Südostungarn,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 32, pp. 181–95.Google Scholar
Szokolay, Margìt, “A magyarorszàgi beseny őtelepekről,” Föld és Ember ix. 2 (1929).Google Scholar
Tamura, Jitsuzō, Kita Ajiya ni okeru Rekishi Jekai no Keisei, Tokyo, 1956.Google Scholar
Tamura, Jitsuzo and Yukio, Kobayashi, 1953, Keiryo [Tombs and Mural Paintings of Ch'ing-ling. Liao Imperial Mausoleum of Eleventh Century A.D. in Eastern Mongolia], 2 volumes (Kyoto).Google Scholar
T'ang hui-yao (T'ang compilations, comp. P'u, Wang et al., chi-ch'eng, Ts'ung-shu ed., 16 vols. (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
Tao, Jing-shen, 1976, The Jurchen in Twelfth-Century China. A Study in Sinicization (Seattle–London).Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W., 1938, The Greeks in Bactria and India, (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. 1951, The Greeks in Bactria and India, 2nd edition, (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Tasaka, Kōdō, “Chū Tō ni okeru seihoku henkyō no jōsei ni tsuite” (On the state of the north-western frontiers in the mid-T'ang), Tōhō gakuhō, 11.2: 585–625 (Tokyo, 1940).Google Scholar
Taskin, V. S., 1968–73, Materialy po istorii sjunnu. (Po kitajskim istochnikom), 1–11 (Moscow).Google Scholar
Taskin, V. S., 1979, E Lun-li, Istorija gosudarstva kidanej (Cidan'go chzhi), Pamjatniki pis'mennosti Vostoka 35 (Moskva).Google Scholar
Tatiščev, V. N., Istorija rossiĭskaja, ed. Tikhomirov, M. N. et al., 7 vols. (Moskva–Leningrad, 1962–8).Google Scholar
Tekin, Talât, 1968, A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series vol. 69 (Bloomington, Indiana). On pp. 259–95, translation of the inscriptions.Google Scholar
Teploukhov, S. A., 1927, “Drevnie pogrebenija v Minusinskom krae,” Materialy po êtnografii, vyp. 2–3.Google Scholar
Ter-krtichjan, L. Kh., 1979, Armjanskie istochniki o Srednej Azii V–VII vv. (Moskva).Google Scholar
Terenozhkin, A. I., 1961, Predskifskij period na dneprovskom Pravoberezh ' e [The Pre-Scythian Period on the Right Bank of the Dnieper] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Terenozhkin, A. I., 1966, “Ob obshchestvennom stroe skifov” [About the Social System of the Scythians], Sovetskaja Arkheologija, 1966, 2, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Terenozhkin, A. I., 1971, Kimmeriicy [The Cimmerians] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Tezcan, Semih, 1977, “Eski türk¸e buyla ve baγa sanlari üzerine,” Türk Dili Arastirmalari Yilligt Belleten pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kansho Kyōdo to no Washin Jōyaku ni Kansuru ni san no mondai,” Shien, vol., 12, No. 2 (Dec, 1948).Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo Bokkō Shiron,” Shien, vol. 32, No. 2 (March, 1971).Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo no Jōkaku ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 16, No. 1 (June, 1955).Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo Zenu Sōzoku Kō,” Shien, vol. 20, No. 2 (Dec, 1959).Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Minami Kyōdo no koko to Shinkō to no tsuite,” Shien, vol. 27, No. 1 (June, 1966).Google Scholar
Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Nitchikuō Hi no dokuritsu to Minami Kyōdo no Zenu Keishō ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 25, No. 2 (Nov., 1964).Google Scholar
,The Khazar Hebrew Correspondence: Kokovcov, P. K., Evereĭsko-khazarskaja perepiska v X veke (Moskva-Leningrad, 1932).Google Scholar
Theophanes, , Chronographia, ed. Boer, C. 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1883, reprint, Hildesheim, 1963).Google Scholar
Theophanus, Continuatus, Historiae, ed. Bekker, J. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1838).Google Scholar
Thomas, F. W., 1944, “Sino-Kharoṣṭhī Coins,” The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society. 6th Series, vol. 4, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. W., 1948, Nam. An Ancient Language of the Sino-Tibetan Borderland (London).Google Scholar
Thomas, F. W., 1935, 1951, 1953, 1963, Tibetan Literary Texts and Documents, 4 vols. (London).Google Scholar
Thompson, E. A., 1946, “Christian Missionaries among the Huns,” Hermathena 67, PP 73–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. A., 1948, A History of Attila and the Huns (London).Google Scholar
Thomsen, V., 1896, Inscriptions de l'Orkhon déchiffrées, Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne V. 1924, “Alttürkische Inschriften der Mongolei,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 78, pp. 121–75. Translated from Danish by Schaeder, H. H..Google Scholar
Thúry, J., “A khazar isa méltóságnévről,” Keleti Szemle 4 (1903).Google Scholar
Ting, Ch'ien. Hsiung-nu Chuan K'ao-cheng, ts'ung-shu, P'eng-lai Ti-li edition, Chekiang Shu-chü, 1915.Google Scholar
Tirr, D. A., 1976, “The Attitude of the West Towards the Avars,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 28, pp. 111–21.Google Scholar
Togan, A.Z.V., Umumî Türk tarihine giriş, 2nd ed. (İstanbul, 1970) vol. I (all published).Google Scholar
Togan, Ahmed Z. V., “Völkerschaften des Chazarenreiches im neunten Jahrhundert,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum 3 (1940).Google Scholar
Toivonen, Y. H., “Zur Frage der Finnisch-Ugrischen Urheimat,” Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne. lvi (1952).Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P., 1948, Drevnij Khorezm (Moskva).Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P., “Khorezmiĭskaja genealogija Samuila Aby. Ešče raz k voprosu o kavarakh-khorezmiĭcakh,” Sovetskaja Êtnografija I (1947).Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P., Po sledam drevnekhorezmiĭskoĭ civilizacii (Moskva-Leningrad, 1948).Google Scholar
Tomaschek, W., 1888, “Kritik der ältesten Nachrichten über den skythischen Norden,” Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften, 116, pp. 715–80; 117, pp. 1–70. [This oft-cited work is now completely outdated].Google Scholar
Tomka, P., 1971, “Le problème de la survivance des Avars dans la littérature archéologique hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 24, pp. 217–52.Google Scholar
Toyama, Gunji, 1964, Kinchōshi Kenkyū [Researches into the History of the Chin Dynasty] (Kyoto).Google Scholar
Toyota, Goro, 1963, “Kitan reiji ko,” [A Study of the Simple Kitan Characters], Toyo gakuho 39 pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Trefilov, G. N., Proiskhoždenie udmurtskogo naroda (Iževsk, 1956).Google Scholar
Trer'jakov, P. N., Finno-ugry, balty i slavjane na Dnepre i Volge (Moskva-Leningrad, 1966).Google Scholar
Tret'jakov, P. N. and Mongajt, A. L., Pervobytno-obshchinnyj stroj i drevnejshie gosudarstva na territorii SSSR, (Moskva, 1956).Google Scholar
Trijarsky, Edward, 1981, “Die alttürkischen Runen-Inschriften in den Arbeiten der letzten Jahre. Befunde und kritische Ülbersicht,” Altorientalische Forschungen, 8, pp. 339–352.Google Scholar
Tseng, Yung, “Liao-ning Hsi-ch'a-kou ku-mu ch'ün wei Wu-huan i-chi lun,” K'ao-ku, 1961:6.Google Scholar
Tu, Yu, T'ung-tien (Complete institutions), Wan-yu wen-k'u ed., Shih-t'ung, vol. I (Shanghai, 1935).Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1949, Tibetan Painted Scrolls, Vol. I (Rome).Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1950, The Tombs of the Tibetan Kings, Serie Orientale Roma i (Rome).Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1955–6, “The Sacral Character of the Kings of Ancient Tibet,” East and West 6, pp. 197–205.Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1956, Preliminary Report on two scientific expeditions in Nepal, Serie Orientale Roma X, i (Rome).Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1958, Minor Buddhist Texts, part ii, Serie Orientale Roma ix, 2 (Rome).Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1962, “The wives of Sron-btsan-sgam-po,” Oriens Extremus, 9, pp. 121–126.Google Scholar
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1973, Transhimalaya, translated from the French by James Hogarth (London).Google Scholar
Tung-Hu Min-tsu K'ao, translated into Chinese by Chuang-yu, Fang, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Turan, O., Selçuklular tarihi ve Türk-İslâm medeniyeti (Türk Kültürünü Araştirma Enstitüsü yayinlari, 7, Ankara, 1965).Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, “Gokanjo Minami Kyōdo Den no Kitazenu Ojoken Kiji ni tsuite,” Iwai Hakase Koki Kinen Ronbunshū, Tokyo, 1963.Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, “Gōkan Kōbutei no tai-Minami Kyōdo seisuku ni tsuite,” Shirin, 17:4 (October, 1932), and 18:1 (Jan., 1933).Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, “Gōkan makki yori Gokoran boppatsu ni itaru Kyōdo gobu no josei ni tsuite,” Shirin, 9:2 (Apr., 1934).Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, Kodai no Mōko, Tokyo, 1940.Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, “Kyōdo Jujuden Chimei Kō,” Takigawa Hakase Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshū, vol. i: Tōyōshi hen, 1957.Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, Kyōdō shi Kenkyū, Osaka, 1953.Google Scholar
Uchida, Gimpū, “Zenu no shōgō to Kyōdo Zenutei no ichi ni tsuite,” Tōhōgaku, No. 12 (1956).Google Scholar
Uray, G., 1979, “The Old Tibetan Sources of the History of Central Asia up to 751 a.d.: A Survey,” in: Prolegomena to the Sources on the History of Pre-Islamic Central Asia, edited by Harmatta, J., pp. 275–304 (Budapest).Google Scholar
Uray, G., 1960, “The Four Horns of Tibet according to the Royal Annals,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 10, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Uray, G., 1962, “The Offices of the Brun-pas and Great Mnans and the Territorial Division of Central Tibet in the Early 8th Century,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15, pp. 353–60.Google Scholar
Vadeckaja, E. B. 1967, Drevnie ljudi Eniseja (Leningrad).Google Scholar
Vajda, L., “Zur Frage der Völkerwanderungen,” Paideuma, 19/20 (1973–4).Google Scholar
Vásáry, I., 1972, “Runiform Signs on Objects of the Avar Period,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25, pp. 335–47.Google Scholar
Vásáry, István, “The Hungarians or Možars and the Meščers/Mišers of the Middle Volga Region,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, i (1975).Google Scholar
Vasil'ev, B. A., “Problema burtasov i mordvy,” Voprosy etničeskoĭ istorii mordovskogo naroda (Trudy Mordovskoĭ Etnografičeskoĭ Ekspedicii i, Trudy Instituta Etnografii, 63, Moskva, 1960).Google Scholar
Vasil'ev, V. P., 1857, Istorija i drevnosti vostochnoj chasti Srednej Azii ot X do XIII v. s prilozheniem perevoda kitajskikh izvestij o kidanjakh, chzhurchzhênjakh i mongolo-tatarakh, Trudy vostochnago otdêlenija Imperatorskago Russkago Arkheologi-cheskago Obshchestva. 4, (St. Petersburg).Google Scholar
Vasil'evskiĭ, V. G., Vizantija i Pečenegi in Trudi V.G. Vasil'evskago, 4 vols. (Sankt-peterburg, 1908, reprint: Russian Reprint Series LXIX/I, The Hague, 1968), 1.Google Scholar
Vasil'evskij, R. S., 1961, “Drevnjaja korjakskaja kul'tura (po arkheologicheskim raskopkam na Okhotskom poberezh'e),” in Voprosy istorii Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. Trudy konferencii po istorii Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. […] Mart 1960 (Novosibirsk), pp. 321–5.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, Alexander A., The Goths in the Crimea (Monographs of the Medieval Academy, 11, Cambridge, Mass., 1936).Google Scholar
Vernadsky, George, Ferdinandy, M., Studien zur ungarischen Frühgeschichte (Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, 47, München, 1957).Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. B., 1963. Sarmaty Severo-Vostochnogo Kavkaza [The Sarmatians of the Northeastern Caucasus] (Grozny).Google Scholar
Visdelou, , 1779, Observations sur ce que les historiens arabes et persiens rapportent de la Chine et de la Tartarie dans la Biliothèque Orientale de Mr d'Herbelot on pp. 7–366 of d'Herbelot, Bibliothèque orientale, (La Haye).Google Scholar
Vjazmitina, M. I., 1962, Zolota Balka [Zolota Balka] (Kiev 1962).Google Scholar
Vjazmitina, M. I., 1972, Zoloto-Balkovskij kurgan [The burial place of Zoloto-Balkovskij] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Volin, S. L. et al. (ed.), Materialy po istorii Turkmen i Turkmenii, 2 vols. (Moskva–Leningrad, 1938–9), vol. I.Google Scholar
Volin, S. L., “Svedenija arabskikh istočnikov IX–XVI vv. o doline reki Talas i smezhnykh rajonakh,” Trudy Instituta Istorii, Arkheologii i Êtnografii Akadetnii Nauk Kazakhskoj SSR (1960).Google Scholar
Volkov, V. V., 1967, Bronzovyj i rannyj zheleznyj vek Severnoj Mongolii (Ulan-Bator).Google Scholar
von Le Coq, A., Türkçe Mânî elyazilari, trans. Köseraif, F. (İstanbul, 1936).Google Scholar
Vorob'ev, M. V., 1975, Chzhurchzhêni i gosudarstva Czin' (X v.–1234g). Istoricheskij ocherk (Moskva).Google Scholar
Vorob'ev, M. V., 1983, Kul'tura Chzhurchzhênej i gosudarstva Czin′ (Moskva).Google Scholar
Vorob'ev, N. I., Khisamutdinov, G. M., Tatary srednego Povolž'ja i Priural'ja (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Vorob'ev-Desjatovskij, V. S., 1958, “Pamjatniki central' no-aziatskoj pis'mennosti,” UZLGU, 16, p. 280–308.Google Scholar
Vuorela, T., The Finno-Ugric Peoples, trans. Atkinson, J. (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 39, Bloomington–The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Vysotskaja, T. N., 1979, Neapol′ – stolica gosudarstva pozdnikh skifov [Neapolis – Capital of the Late Scythian State] (Kiev).Google Scholar
Waldmüller, Lothar, 1976, Die ersten Begegnungen der Slawen mit dem Christentum und den christlichen Völkern vom VI. bis VIII. Jahrhundert. Die Slawen zwischen Byzanz und Abendland (Amsterdam). [An important work concerning the connections between the Avars and the Slavs].Google Scholar
Wang, Kuo-wei, Kuan-t'ang chi-lin, Taipei, Shih-chieh Shu-chü, 1961.Google Scholar
Wang, Chi-wu, 1961, The Forests of China with a Survey of Grassland and Desert Vegetation (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Wang, Huan, 1983, “Apa Qaghan Founder of the Western Turkish Khanate, the Splitting up of the Turkish Khanate and the Formation of the Western Turkish Khanate,” Social Sciences in China, 2, pp. 124–54.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton, 1961, Records of the Grand Historian of China, translated from the Shih-chi, of Ssu-ma, Ch'ien (New York).Google Scholar
Watson, William, 1971, Cultural Frontiers in Ancient East Asia (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Watters, Th., 1904, On Yuan Chwang's Travels in India, 629–645 A.D. (London).Google Scholar
Wei shu [History of the Wei], pei-yao, Ssu pu edition, vols. 65–67 (Shanghai 1936).Google Scholar
Wen, Ch'ung-i, “Han-tai Hsiung-nu tè she-hui tsu-chih yü wen-hua hsing-t'ai,” Pien-chiang Web-hua Lun-chi, edited by Shun-sheng, Ling et al., vol. 2, Taipei, 1953.Google Scholar
Wenger, S., 1975, “Paleoanthropology of the Population Deriving from the Avar Period at Fészerlakpuszta,” Anthropologia Hungarica 14, pp. 57–100.Google Scholar
Werner, Joachim, 1956, Beiträge zur Archäologie des Attila-Reiches, Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, NF. 38, A. [Gives good references to the earlier archeological literature].Google Scholar
Wernstedt, Frederick V., 1972, World Climatic Data, vol. iv (Lemans, PA.).Google Scholar
Whitehead, R. B., 1914, Catalogue of the Coins in the Punjab Museum, Lahore, vol. i, Indo-Greek Coins (Oxford).Google Scholar
Wichmann, Y., “Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörter in den permischen Sprachen,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. xxi (1903).Google Scholar
Widengren, Geo, 1952, “Xosrau Anōšurvān, les Hephtalites et les peuples turcs. Etude préliminaire des sources.,” Orientalia Suecana, I, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. A., – Fêng, Chia-shêng, 1949, History of Chinese Society. Liao (907–1125), Transactions of the American Philosophical Society N.S. 36 (Philadephia).Google Scholar
Wladikin, W. E., “Die; frühen Perioden der Ethnogeschichte der Udmurten (Wotjaken),” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 21 (1972).Google Scholar
Yamada, Nobuo, “Kyūsei Kaikotsu kahan no keifu” (Qaghans of the Uighurs of Nine Clans), The Toyo Gakuho. 33. 3–4: 90–113 (1950).Google Scholar
Yang, K'uan, Chan-kuo Shih, Shanghai, 1955.Google Scholar
Yāqūt, , Mu'jam al-Buldān (“Geographical Dictionary”), 5 vols. (Beirut, 1957).Google Scholar
Yegorov, V. T., “Ễtnogenez čuvašeĭ; po dannym jazyka,” Sovetskaja Etnografija, no. 3 (1950).Google Scholar
, Ying-shih, 1967, Trade and Expansion in China. A Study in the Structure of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations (Berkeley and Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Zacharias, Rhetor, Die Sogennante Kirchengeschichte des Zacharias Rhetor, trans. Ahrens, K., Krüger, G. (Leipzig, 1889).Google Scholar
Zadneprovskij, Ju. A.Mokrynin, V. P., 1984, “Rannefeodal'nye gosudarstva VI–X vv.,” chapter IV, pp. 219–89 in Istorija Kirgizskoj SSSR I (Frunze).Google Scholar
Zaja̧czkowski, Ananiasz, Zestudiów nadzagadnieniem chazarskim (Polska Akademia Umiejȩtnosci, Prace komisji orientalistycznej, 36, Kraków–Warszawa, 1947).Google Scholar
Zaja̧czkowski, Ananiasz, Zwia̧zki jȩzykowe połowiecko-slowiańskie (Prace Wrocławskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego, series A, 34, Wrocław, 1949).Google Scholar
Zaja̧czkowski, Ananiasz, Karaims in Poland (Warszawa–Le Haye–Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
Zakhoder, B. N., Kaspiĭskiĭ svod svedeniĭ o vostočnoĭ evrope, 2 vols. (Moskva, 1962, 1967).Google Scholar
Zaseckaja, I. P., 1971, “Osobennosti pogrebal'nogo obrjada gunnskoj êpokhi na territorii stepej Povol'zhja i Severnogo Prichernomo'rja” [Characteristics of the Burial Rite in the Volga Steppes and in the Region North of the Black Sea during the Hun Epoch] Arkheologicheskij sbornik Gos. Ermitazha, 13, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
Zástěrová, Bohumila, 1971, Les Avares et les Slaves dans la Tactique de Maurice (Praha).Google Scholar
Zejmal, E. V., 1971, “Sino-kharoshtijskie monety. (K datirovke khotanskogo dvujazychnogo chekana),” Strany i narody Vostoka 10, pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
Zlatarski, V., Istorija na Bǔlgarskata dŭržava prez srednite vekove, 2 vols., ed. Petrov, Khr. (Sofija, 1970).Google Scholar
Zograf, A. N., 1937, Monety Geraj (Tashkent).Google Scholar
Zöllner, E., 1950, “Awarisches Namensgut in Bayern und Österreich,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung 58, pp. 244–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolotareva, I. M. (ed.), Etnogenez finno-ugorskikh narodov po dannym antropologii (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, “Finnugor népnevek. I. JugriaNyelvtudományi Közlemények, xlvii (1928–30), xlvii (1931–4).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, Finnugor rokonságunk (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, A finnugorság ismertetése (Budapest, 1958).Google Scholar
Zürcher, E., 1959, The Buddhist Conquest of China. The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China, (Leiden). Contains many references to Inner Asia.Google Scholar
Zürcher, E., 1968, “The Yüeh-chih and Kaniska in the Chinese Sources,” in Basham, , 1968, pp. 358–90.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Denis Sinor, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Denis Sinor, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Denis Sinor, Indiana University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.017
Available formats
×