Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:28:55.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The peoples of the Russian forest belt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Peter B. Golden
Affiliation:
Rutgers State University
Denis Sinor
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

Below a line running approximately from Kiev through Riazan to Kazan, lie the south Russian steppes. The region north of this line gives way to a transitional forest-steppe (lesostep') zone before becoming the densely wooded tracts of the Russian and Siberian forests. The latter, in turn, become the taiga and tundra zones in the far north. The great contrast in physical setting is reflected in the economic activities that evolved in these regions. The steppe, in historical times, was largely populated by pastoral nomads of Iranian and Altaic speech. The early population of the eastern Russian forests, our area of concern, consisted primarily of fishing and hunting peoples who spoke Uralic languages. The forest-steppe region became the contact zone between the southern nomads and the northern hunters and trappers. The former, when they entered the contact zone, made certain adaptations in their life-style, becoming semi-nomadic with ever greater emphasis placed on sedentary pursuits. Those Uralic elements that entered the forest-steppe zone, in turn, were drawn increasingly to the steppe and its mode of existence, becoming in time stereotypical, equestrian nomads.

The medieval history of the Russian forest belt is largely concerned with three important movements of peoples. The first is the steady expansion of the Eastern Slavic population from the western periphery of the Eurasian forests to the East. This movement was particularly successful in the forest zone and brought the Volga—Oka mesopotamia into their possession. It also led to the absorption and or conquest of the Finnic peoples of Northern and Central Russia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, (“The Regions of the World”), trans. Minorsky, V. F. (Gibb Memorial Series, New Series, XI, London, 1937, 2nd rev. ed. London, 1970).Google Scholar
Abu, Ḥ;āmid al-Gharnāṭī, Tuḥfat al-Albāb wa Nukhbat al-'Ajāʾīb (“The Gift of the Hearts and Selection of the Wonders”): Abu Ḥāmid el-Grenadino y su relación de viaje por tierras eurasiáticas, ed. trans. Dubler, C. E. (Madrid, 1953).Google Scholar
Abu'l-Fidā, , Taqwīm al-Buldān (“Geography of the Lands”): Géographie d'Aboulféda, ed. Reinaud, R., Slane, M. Bon MacGuckin (Paris, 1840).Google Scholar
Adamus, Bremensis, Gesta Hamburgensis Ecclesiae Pontificum, ed. Schmeidler, B. (MGH. Scriptores in usum scholarum, Hannover–Leipzig, 1917).Google Scholar
Aininiskiĭ, S. A., “Izvestija vengerskikh missionerov XIII–XV vv. o Tatarakh i Vostočnoĭ Evrope,” Istoričeskiĭ Arkhiv, III (1940).Google Scholar
Al-Bakrī: Kunik'A, Rozen' A, Rozen', , V., “Izvestija al-Bekri o Rusi i lavjanakh i, “Zapiski Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk,” 32 (1878).
Al-Iṣṭakhrī, , Kitāb Masālik al-Mamālik: Viae regnorum,” ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, 1 Leiden, 1870).
Al-Idrīsī, , Kitāb Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Afāq: Opus Geographicum sive “Liber ad eorum delectationem qui terras peragrare studeant,” ed. Cerulli, E., Gabrieli, F. et al. fasc. 17 (Leiden, 1970–8).Google Scholar
Al-Marwazī, , Ṭabāʾi al-Ḥayawān (“The Nature of Animals”): Sharaf al-Zamān Ṭāhir Marwazī on China, the Turks and India, ed. trans. Minorsky, V. F. (London, 1942).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī (?), , Akhbār al-Zamān wa man abādahu'l-Ḥidthān wa 'Ajāʾib al-Buldān wa Ghāmir bi'l-Ma' wa'ł-'Umrān [“The History of Times Past (lit. 'The Information of Times which Eveñts have exterminated) and the Wonders of the Lands and Wastes on Water and Cultivated Lands”] (Beirut, 1966).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdi, , Kitāb al-Tanbīh wa'l Ishrāf (“The Book of Admonition and Recension”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, VIII, Leiden, 1894).Google Scholar
Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj al-Dhabab wa Maʿādin al-Jawhar (“Meadows of Gold and Mines of Precious Stones”), ed. Pellat, C. (Beirut, 1966–79) 7 vols.Google Scholar
Al-Muqaddasī, , Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm fī Ma'rifat al-Aqālīm (“The Best of Divisions Regarding Knowledge of the Climes”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, III, Leiden, 1906).Google Scholar
Alikhova, A. E., “K voprosu o burtasakh,” Sovetskaja Êtnografija, no. 1 (1949).Google Scholar
Annales Fuldenses, ed. Kurze, F. (MGH. Scriptores in usum scholarum, XIII, Hannover, 1891).Google Scholar
Ašmarin, N. I., Bolgary i Čuvašy (Kazan', 1902).Google Scholar
Bárczi, G., Benkő, L., Berrár, J., A magyar nyelv története (Budapest, 1967).Google Scholar
Bárczi, Géza, A magyar nyelv életrajza (Budapest, 3rd ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Bartha, Antal, Hungarian Society in the 9th and 10th Centuries (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Bartha, Antal, Czegléedy, Károly, Róna-Tas, András (eds.), Magyar őstörténeti tanulmányok (Budapest, 1977).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Basdžirt,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., v (Enzyklopedie des Islam, 4 vols, Leiden–Leipzig, 1913–36).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Bolgary,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Bartol'd, V. V., “Burtasy,” Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Socinenija, 9 vols (Moskva, 1963–73).Google Scholar
Begunov, Ju. K., Pamjatnik russkoĭ literatury xiii veka “Slovo o pogibeli russkoĭ zemli” (Moskva–Leningrad, 1965).Google Scholar
Bendefy, L., Fontes authentici itinera (1235–1338) Fr. Iuliani illustrantes, Archivum Europae Centro–Orientalis, III, (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd, Tanulmányok a magyar nyelv életrajza köréből (Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 40, Budapest, 1963–6).Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd, et al., A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára, 4 vols. (Budapest, 1967–84).Google Scholar
Boba, Imre, Nomads, Northmen and Slavs Slavo-Orientalia, ii, (The Hague–Wiesbaden, 1967).Google Scholar
C̆ekalin, F., “Meščera i Burtasy po sokhranivšimsja o ikh pamjatnikam,” Trudy VIII Arkheologičeskago s"ezda, III (Moskva, 1897).Google Scholar
C̆ermecov, V. I., “Nižnee Priob'e v I tysjačeletii n.e.,” Materialy i issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 58 (1957).Google Scholar
Constantinus et Methodius Thessalonicenses, Fontes (Konstantin i Metodije Solunjani, Izvori), ed. Grivec, F., Tomšić, F. (Radovi Staroslavenskog Instituta, IV, Zagreb, 1960).Google Scholar
Csallány, D., “Rovásirásos gyűrűk Magyarországon,” Archaeológiai Értesítő, 82 (1955).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Magna Hungaria,” Századok, 75 (1943).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A magyarság Dél-Oroszországban” in Ligeti, L.(ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “A IX századi magyar történelem föbb kérdései,” Magyar Nyelv, XLI (1945).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, IV–IX századi népmozgalmak a steppén (A Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Kiadványai, 84, Budapest, 1954).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, Hajdú, Péter (eds.), A magyar őstörténet kérdései Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 5, (Budapest, 1955).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Pseudo-Zacharias Rhetor on the Nomads,” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), Studia Turcica (Budapest, 1971).Google Scholar
Czeglédy, Károly, “Etimológia és filológia (Bulgár-török jövevényszavaink átvételének történeti hátteréről),” in Benkő, L., Sál, E. K. (eds.), Az etimológia elmélete és módszere (Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 89, Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Da̧browski, Krzysztof, Nagrodzka-Majchrzyk, Teresa, Tryjarski, Edward, Hunowie Europejscy, Protobułgarzy, Chazarowie, Pieczyngowie (Wroław-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdańsk, 1975).Google Scholar
de Vajay, Sz., Der Eintritt des ungarischen Stämmebundes in die europäischen Geschichte (München, 1968).Google Scholar
Décsy, Gyula, Einführung in die Finnisch-Ugrische Sprachwissenschaft (Wiesbaden, 1965).Google Scholar
Deér, József, Pogány magyarság keresztény magyarság (Budapest, 1938).Google Scholar
Dexippi, Eunapii, Petri Patricii, Prisci, Malchi, Menandri historiarum quae supersunt, ed. Bekker, I., Niebuhr, B. G. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1829).Google Scholar
Dienes, István, The Hungarians Cross the Carpathians, trans. Balogh, B. (Budapest, 1972).Google Scholar
Ducellier, A., “Les sources byzantines et l'apparition des Hongrois en Europe,” Études Finno-Ougriennes, I (1964).Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Bol'šaja Vengrija,” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 13 (1961).Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Teorii vengerskikh učenykh o povolžskom proiskhoždenii drevnikh vengrov,” Arkheologija i Etnografija Baškirii, 4 (1971).Google Scholar
Erdélyi, István, “Fouilles archéologiques en Bachkirie et la préhistoire hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 25 (1972).Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. R., Istoričeskie svjazi čuvašskogo jazyka s jazykami finno-ugrov Povolž'ja i Pecmi, C̆uvašsko-mariĭskie jazykovve svjazi, pt. 1 (C̆eboksary, 1965).Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. R., Istoričeskie svjazi C̆uvašskogo s volžskimi i permskimi finno-ugroskimi i jazykami (C̆eboksary, 1968).Google Scholar
Fehér, Géza, A bolgár-törökök szerepe és műveltsége (Budapest, 1940).Google Scholar
Fehér, Géza, “Zur Geschichte der Steppenvölker von Südrussland 9–10 Jhr.,” Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 5 (1959).Google Scholar
Fodor, István, “K voprosu o pogrebal'nom obrjade drevnikh vengrov,” Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Fodor, István, Verecke híres útján … (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Gardīzī, , Zain al-Akhbār (“Adornment of Information”), excerpts in: Bartol'd, V. V., “Izvlečenie iz sočinenija Gardizi zain al-Akhbār, in Akademik V. V. Bartol'd Sočinenija, 9vols (Moskva, 1963–73), vol. 8.Google Scholar
Garipov, T. M., Kuzeev, R. G., “Baškiro-Mad'jarskaja problema,” Arkheologija i Etnografija I (1962).Google Scholar
Gening, V. F., Khalikov, A. Kh., Rannie bolgary na Volge (Moskva, 1964).Google Scholar
Gening, V. F., Khalikov, A. Kh., “Etnogenez udmurtov po dannym arkheologii,” Voprosy finno-ugorskovo jazykoznanija IV (1967).Google Scholar
Georgios Monakhos, : Georgii Monachi chronicon, ed. Boor, Carl, I–II (Leipzig, 1904).Google Scholar
Ginagi, Kh.G (ed.), Istorija Tatarskoĭ ASSR, 2 vols (Kazan', 1955–60).Google Scholar
Göckenjan, H., Hilfsvölker und Grenzwächter im mittelalterlichen Ungarn (Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte des östlichen Europa, V, Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The People,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B., “The Q'azaro-Hungarian Title Personal Name Ἰέεχ,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, “Die Bulgarisch-Türkischen Lehnwörter in der ungarischen Sprache,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne., 30 (1912).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, “Árpádkori török személy neveink,” Magyar Nyelv, XI (1915).Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltan, Honfoglalás előtti bolgártörök jövevényszavaink, ed. Ligeti, L. (Budapest, 1960).Google Scholar
Grekov, Boris D., “Volžskie bolgary v ix–x vv.,” Istoričeskie Zapiski 14 (1945).Google Scholar
Gyóni, M., “Kalizok, kazárok, kabarok, magyarok,” Magyar Nyelv XXXIV (1938).Google Scholar
Gyóni, M., Magyarország és a magyarság a bizánci források tükrében, (Magyar–Görög Tanulmányok–Oὐγγρọεккηṿιкαὶ Mελέται, 24, Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Györffy, Gy. (ed.), A magyarok elődeiről és a honfoglalásról (Budapest, 1958).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Besenyők és magyarok,” Kőrösi Csoma Archivum. Supplement vol. 1 (1939).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, Tanulmányok a magyar állam eredetéről (Budapest, 1959).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Magyarország népessége a honfoglalástól a XIV sz. közepéig” in Kovacsics, J. (ed.), Magyarország történeti demográfiája (Budapest, 1963).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, “Système des résidences d'hiver et d'été chez les nomades et les chefs hongrois du Xe siècle,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Győrffy, György, Autour de l'état des semi-nomades: le cas de la Hongrie Studia Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 95, Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, “K etnogenezu vengerskogo naroda,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2 (1952).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, A magyarság kialakulásának előzményei. Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 2; (Budapest, 1953).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Finnugor népek és nyelvek (Budapest, 1962).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Eng. trans.: Finno-Ugrian Languages and Peoples, trans. Cushing, G. F. (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, “Finnougrische Urheimatforschung,” UA. 41 (1969).Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter, Bevezetés az uráli nyelvtudományba (Budapest, 1966).Google Scholar
Halasi-Kun, Tibor, “A magyarság kaukázusi története” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Halasi-Kun, Tibor, “Kipchak Philology and the Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian, I,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 1, (1975).Google Scholar
Hrbek, I., “Ein arabischer Bericht über Ungarn (Abū Ḥāmid al-Andalūsī al-Ġarnāṭī 1080–1170),” Acta Orientalia Hungarica, 5 (1955).Google Scholar
Ibn, Ḥawqal, Kitāb Ṣurat al-Arḍ: Opus Geographicum auctore Ibn Ḥauḳal “Liber Imaginis Terrae”, ed. Kramers, J. H. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, II2, Leiden, 1938–9), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla: Togan, A. Zeki Validi (ed. trans.), Ibn Faḍlān's Reisebericht Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, XXIV, 3 (Leipzig, 1939).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla: Kovalevskiĭ, A. P. (facs. ed., trans.), Kniga Ibn Fadlana o ego putešestvii na Volgu v 921–922 gg. (Khar'kov, 1956).Google Scholar
Ibn, Faḍlān, Risāla, ed. Dahān, S. (Damascus, 1379/1960).Google Scholar
Ibn, Rusta, Kitāb al-A'lāq al-Nafīsa (“The Book of Precious Gems”), ed. Goeje, M. J. (Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, VII, Leiden, 1892).Google Scholar
Itkonen, Erkki, “Zur geographischen Ausdehnung der finnisch-ugrischen Urheimat,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
Jamguzin, R. Z., “Istorija i sovremennoe sostojanie izučenija etnogeneza i etničeskoĭ istorii Baškir,” in Akmonov, I. K. (ed.), Iz istorii Baškirii (Ufa, 1968).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Romilly J. H. (ed.), Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, Volume II, Commentary (London, 1962).Google Scholar
Jordanes, , Getica, Iordan, O proiskhoždenii i dejanijakh getov (ed. trans.) Skržinskaja, E. C̆ (Moskva, 1960).Google Scholar
Káldy-Nagy, Gyula, (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Khakimzjanov, F. S., “Sledy dialektov v jazyke pamjatnikov volžskoĭ Bulgarii,” Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 4 (1974).Google Scholar
Khalikov, A. Kh., “K voprosu o načale tjurkizacii naselenija Povolž'ja i Priural'ja,” Sovetskaja Etnografija no. 7 (1972).Google Scholar
Khalikova, E. A., “Pogrebal'nyĭ obrjad Tankeevskogo mogil'nika i ego vengerskie paralleli,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Kokhavskiĭ, I., Proiskhodenie čuvašskogo naroda (Čeboksary, 1965).Google Scholar
Kokovcev, P. K. (ed., trans.), Evreĭsko-khazarskaja perepiska v X veke (Leningrad, 1932).Google Scholar
Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos, : Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, ed. Moravcsik, Gyula, trans. Jenkins, R. J. H. (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, i, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C., 1967).Google Scholar
Kristó, Gyula, Róna-Tas, András (eds.), Bevezetés a magyar őstörténet kutatásának forrásaiba, III, 3 vols. (Budapest, 1976–7).Google Scholar
Kuzeev, R. G. (ed.) Baškirskie šežere (Ufa, 1960).Google Scholar
Kuzeev, R. G.Proiskhoždenie baškirskogo naroda (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Laščuk, L. P., Formirovanie narodnosti Komi (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, “K voprosu o formirovanii finno-ugrov,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, A honfoglalókról (Budapest, 1973).Google Scholar
László, Gyula, A “kettős honfoglalás” (Budapest, 1978).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz (ed. trans.), Źródła arabskie do dziejów słowiańszczyzny, 1–11 (Wrocław-Kraków-Warszawa, 1956–77).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, “Türkische Stadt Dānā nach einem Bericht des Arabischen Geographen Ibn al-Faqīh,” Folia Orientalia, 13 (1971).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Tadeusz, “Les noms des Hongrois et de la Hongrie chez les médiévaux géographes arabes et persans,” Folia Orientalia, 19 (1978).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Kündü,“ Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 48 (1931).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régibb török jövevényszavaink magyarázatához,” Magyar Nyelv, XXIX (1933), XXX (1934), XXXI (1935), XXXIII (1937).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Az uráli magyar őshaza,” in Ligeti, L. (ed.), A magyarság őstörténete (Budapest, 1943).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A török szókészlet története és török jövevényszavaink, Gyöngy,” Magyar Nyelv, XLII (1946).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Gyarmat és Jenő,” Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 40 (1963).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A magyar nép mongol-kori neveiMagyar Nyelv, LX (1964).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régi török jövevényszavaink etimológiai problémái” in Benkő, L., Sál, E. K. (eds.), Az etimológia elmélete és módszere Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 89, (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “A magyar nyelv török kapcsolatai és ami körülöttük van,” Magyar Nyelv, LXXII (1976).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, A magyar nyelv török kapcsolatai és ami körülöttük van, ed. Schütz, E., Apor, E. (Budapest Oriental Reprints, Series A 1 and 2, vol. III, Budapest, 1977–9).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Lajos, “Régi török eredetű neveink,” Magyar Nyelv, LXXIV (1978), LXXV (1979), LXXV (1979).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis (Lajos), “Ảpropos des éléments altaïques de la langue hongrois,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11 (1961).Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis (Lajos), “Quelques problèmes étymologiques des anciens mots d'emprunt turcs de la langue hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 29 (1975).Google Scholar
Lotz, János, “Etymological Connections of magyar Hungarian,” in For Roman Jakobson (The Hague, 1956).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., “Einige ostseefinnische Lehnwörter in komi-syrjänischen Mundarten,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 31 (1959).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., “K etimologii slov ugry i jugra,” Etimologija (1968).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., et al. (eds.), Osnovy finno-ugrovskogo jazykoznanija/Voprosy proiskhoždenija i razvitija finno-ugrovskikh jazykov (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Lytkin, V. I., et al. (eds.), Osnovy finno-ugrovskogo juzykoznanija/Marũskũ, permskie i ugrovskie jazyki (Moskva, 1976).Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A., The Magyars in the Ninth Century (Cambridge, 1930, reprint: 1968).Google Scholar
Manninen, I., Die Finnisch-Ugrischen Völker (Leipzig, 1932).Google Scholar
Marquart, Josef, Osteuropäische und Ostasiatische Streifzüge (Leipzig, 1903, reprint: Hildesheim, 1961).Google Scholar
Marquart, Josef, “Ein arabischer Bericht über die arktischen (uralischen) Länder aus dem 10. Jahrhundert,” Ungarische Jahrbücher, 4 (1924).Google Scholar
Merkuškin, G. Ja., “Vkhoždenie mordovskogo naroda v sostav russkogo centralizo-vannogo gosudarstva,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Molnár, Erik, A magyar nép őstörténete (Budapest, 1953).Google Scholar
Molnár, Erik, A magyar társadalom története az őskortól az Árpádkorig (Budapest, 2nd ed. 1949).Google Scholar
Mongaĭt, A. L., Rjazanskaja zemlja (Moskva, 1961).Google Scholar
Moór, Elemér, “Die Ausbildung des urungarischen Volkes im Lichte der Laut-und Wortgeschichte,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 6 (1956), 7 (1957), 8 (1958), 9 (1959), 10 (1960).Google Scholar
Moór, Elemér, “Die Benennungen der Ungarn in den Quellen des IX und X Jahrhunderts,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. 31 (1959).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, Byzantinoturcica2 (Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten, 2 vols., Berlin, 1958).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Gyula, Byzantium and the Magyars, trans. Rosenbaum, S. R., rev. trans. Szegedy-Maszák, Mihály, rev. Miklós Szenczi, Zsigmond Ritoók (Amsterdam, 1970).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Julius (Gyula), “Zur Geschichte der Onoguren,” Ungarische Jahrbücher, X (1930).Google Scholar
Moskalenko, A. A., “Slavjano-vengerskie otnošenija v ix v. i drevnerusskoe naselenie srednego i verkhnego Dona,” in Smirnov, A. P. (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ungrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Mujmal al-Tavārīkh (“Compendium of the Histories”), ed. Bahār, M. (Tehran, 1939).Google Scholar
Mukhamedova, R. G., Tatary-Mišari (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, A honfoglaló magyarság kialakulása (Budapest, 1930).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A magyar rovásírás,” A Magyar Nyelvtudomány Kézikönyve, II (1934).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A magyar népnév, a magyar törzsnevek, a kazár népnév,” Magyar Nyelv, XXXIV (1938).Google Scholar
Németh, Gyula, “A baskírföldi magyar őshazáról,” Élet és Tudomány, 13 (1966).Google Scholar
Németh, Julius (Gyula), “Ungarische Stammesnamen bei den Baschkiren,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 16 (1966).Google Scholar
Pais, Dezső, “A Gyula és a kündüh,” Magyar Nyelv, XXVII (1931).Google Scholar
Pais, Dezső, A magyar ősvallás nyelvi emlékeiből (Budapest, 1975).Google Scholar
Palló, Margit K., “Hungaro-Tschuwaschica,” UA., 31 (1959).Google Scholar
Pauler, Gy., Szilágyi, S. (ed. trans.), A magyar honfoglalás kútfői (Budapest, 1900).Google Scholar
Pauler, Gyula, A magyar nemzet története Szent Istvánig (Budapest, 1900).Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Tuomo, “On the Oldest Relationship between Hungarians and Sarmatians: From Spali to Asphali,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 45 (1973).Google Scholar
Pengitov, N. T., Proiskhoždenie mariĭskogo naroda (Jaškar-Ola, 1967).Google Scholar
Perényi, J., “A ‘Magna Hungaria’ kérdéséhez,” Magyar Nyelv, LV (1959).Google Scholar
Popov, A. I., “Burtasy i mordva,” UZLGU no. 105, serija vostokovedčeskikh nauk z, 1948.Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Bolgaro-Tschuwaschica,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher., 31 (1959).Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “From the Säbirs to the Hungarians,” in Káldy-Nagy, Gy. (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, “Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörte im Tscheremissischen,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. lxvii (1920).Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, Uralaltaische Wortforschungen (Studia Orientalia edidit Societas Orientalis Fennica, xviii: 3, Helsinki, 1955).Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti, “Gibt es im Baschkirischen etwas Ugrisches,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 12 (1960).Google Scholar
Rásonyi, László, “Başkurt ve Macar yurtlanndaki ortak coğrafî adlar üzerine,” X Türk Dil Kurultayinda Okunan Bilimsel Bildiriler, 1963 (Ankara, 1964).Google Scholar
Rédei, K., Die syrjänischen Lehnwörter im Wogulischen (Budapest, 1970).Google Scholar
Rohan-Csermak, Géza, “La patrie primitive des Finno-Ougriens sous l'aspect ethnologique,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
Róheim, G., Hungarian and Vogul Mythology (Monographs of the American Ethnological Society, xxiii, 1954).Google Scholar
Róheim, G., “A kazár nagyfejedelem és a Turulmonda,” Ethnographia, xxviii (1917).Google Scholar
Róheim, G., “A kazár és magyar nagyfejedelem,” Ethnographia, xxix (1918).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A., “A bolgár-török permi érintkezések néhány kérdése,” Nyelvtu-dományi Közlemények, 77 (1975).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A., “A permi nyelvek őspermi bolgár-török jövevényszavai,” Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 74 (1973).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András, – Fodor, S., Epigraphica Bulgarica. A volga bolgár-török feliratok (Studia Uralo-Altaica, i, Szeged, 1973).Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András, “Some Volga Bulgarian Words in the Volga Kipchak Languages,” in Káldy-Nagy, Gy. (ed.), Hungaro-Turcica. Studies in Honour of Julius Németh (Budapest, 1976).Google Scholar
Rudenko, S. I., Baškiry. Istoriko-etnografičeskie očerki (Moskva-Leningrad, 1975).Google Scholar
Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Safargaliev, M. G., “Zametka o burtasakh,” Učenye Zapiski Mordovskogo Naučno-Issledovatel' skogo Instituta Jazyka, Literajury i Istorii 13 (1951).Google Scholar
Schönebaum, H., “Die Kenntnis der byzantinischen Geschichts schreiber von der ältesten Geschichte der Ungarn vor der Landnahme,” Ungarische Bibliothek, first series, 5 (Berlin–Leipzig, 1922).Google Scholar
Sebestyén, Irén N., “Zur Frage des alten Wohngebietes der uralischen Völker,” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae., 1 (1951–2).Google Scholar
Serebrennikov, B. A., K voprosu o svjazi baškirskogo jazyka s vengerskim (Ufa, 1963).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Autour d'une migration de peuples au V siè;cle,” Journal asiatique., 235 (1946–7).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Un voyageur du treizième siècle; le dominicain Julien de Hongrie,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, xiv pt. 3 (1952).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, The Outlines of Hungarian Prehistory,” Cahiers d'histoire mondiale/Journal of World History, iv (1958).Google Scholar
Sinor, Denis, “Geschichtliche Hypothesen und Sprachwissenschaft in der ungarischen, finnisch-ugrischen und uralischen Urgeschichtsforschung,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher., 41 (1969).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Očerki po istorii drevnikh bulgar,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo Muzeja xi (Moskva, 1940).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Očerk drevneĭ istorii Mordvy,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo muzeja xi (Moskva, 1940).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Volžskie bulgary (TrudyGosudarstvennogo Istoričeskogo Muzeja xix, Moskva, 1951).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “K voprosy o burtasakh,” Kratkie Soobščenija o Dokladakh i Polevykh Issledovanijakh Instituta Istorii Material' noĭ Kul'tury AN SSSR xl (1951).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Očerki drevneĭ i srednevekovoĭ istorii narodov Povolž'ja i Prikam'ja (Moskva, 1952).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Železnyĭ vek čuvašskogo Povolž'ja (Materialy i Issledovanija po arkheologii SSSR 95, Moskva, 1961).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda po dannym arkheologii i–xv vv. n.e.,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.), Etnogenez mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., “Ob etničeskom sostave Volžskoĭ Bolgarii’, in Janin, V. L. (ed.), Novoe v arkheologii (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., (ed.), Problemy arkheologii i drevneĭ istorii ugrov (Moskva, 1972).Google Scholar
Smirnov, A. P., Les populations finnoises des bassins de la Volga et de la Kama, trans. Boyer, O. (École des languages orientales vivantes, Publications, 4rth series, vol. 8, Paris, 1898).Google Scholar
Stepanov, P. D., “Burtasy i Mordva,” in Rybakov, B. A. (ed.) Etnogenez Mordovskogo naroda (Saransk, 1965).Google Scholar
Šušarin, V. T., “Russko-vengerskie otnošenija v ix v.,” Meždunarodnye svjazi Rossii do XVII veka (Moskva, 1961.Google Scholar
Symeon Logothetes, : Theophanes Continuatus, Ioannes Cameniata, Symeon Magister, Georgius Monachus, ed. Bekker, I. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonn, 1838).Google Scholar
Szentpétery, E. (ed.), Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Tatiščev, V. N., Istorija rossiĭskaja, ed. Tikhomirov, M. N. et al., 7 vols. (Moskva–Leningrad, 1962–8).Google Scholar
Toivonen, Y. H., “Zur Frage der Finnisch-Ugrischen Urheimat,” Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne. lvi (1952).Google Scholar
Tomka, P., “Le problème de la survivance des Avars dans la littérature archéologique hongroise,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 24 (1971).Google Scholar
Trefilov, G. N., Proiskhoždenie udmurtskogo naroda (Iževsk, 1956).Google Scholar
Trer'jakov, P. N., Finno-ugry, balty i slavjane na Dnepre i Volge (Moskva-Leningrad, 1966).Google Scholar
Vásáry, István, “The Hungarians or Možars and the Meščers/Mišers of the Middle Volga Region,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, i (1975).Google Scholar
Vasil'ev, B. A., “Problema burtasov i mordvy,” Voprosy etničeskoĭ istorii mordovskogo naroda (Trudy Mordovskoĭ Etnografičeskoĭ Ekspedicii i, Trudy Instituta Etnografii, 63, Moskva, 1960).Google Scholar
Vernadsky, George, Ferdinandy, M., Studien zur ungarischen Frühgeschichte (Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, 47, München, 1957).Google Scholar
Vorob'ev, N. I., Khisamutdinov, G. M., Tatary srednego Povolž'ja i Priural'ja (Moskva, 1967).Google Scholar
Vuorela, T., The Finno-Ugric Peoples, trans. Atkinson, J. (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 39, Bloomington–The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Wichmann, Y., “Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörter in den permischen Sprachen,” Mémoires de la Société Finno-ougrienne. xxi (1903).Google Scholar
Wladikin, W. E., “Die; frühen Perioden der Ethnogeschichte der Udmurten (Wotjaken),” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 21 (1972).Google Scholar
Yāqūt, , Mu'jam al-Buldān (“Geographical Dictionary”), 5 vols. (Beirut, 1957).Google Scholar
Yegorov, V. T., “Ễtnogenez čuvašeĭ; po dannym jazyka,” Sovetskaja Etnografija, no. 3 (1950).Google Scholar
Zolotareva, I. M. (ed.), Etnogenez finno-ugorskikh narodov po dannym antropologii (Moskva, 1974).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, “Finnugor népnevek. I. JugriaNyelvtudományi Közlemények, xlvii (1928–30), xlvii (1931–4).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, Finnugor rokonságunk (Budapest, 1937).Google Scholar
Zsirai, Miklós, A finnugorság ismertetése (Budapest, 1958).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×