The Hsiung-nu

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.006

5 - The Hsiung-nu

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Ying-Shih Yü

Edited by

Denis Sinor

Show author details

Ying-Shih Yü: Affiliation:
Princeton University
Denis Sinor: Affiliation:
Indiana University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Chinese written tradition traces the beginnings of the Hsiung-nu back to times immemorial. It is reported that the Hsiung-nu had been known in remote antiquity under a number of different names such as Hun-chu, Hsien-yün, Jung, Ti, etc. In modern times even the name Kuei-fang of the Shang period is added to the list. From a strictly historical point of view, however, all these identifications must remain conjectural in status. The present state of our historical knowledge does not permit us to give any reliable account of the Hsiung-nu much beyond the 3rd century B.C.; and the only other name with which the Hsiung-nu can be safely identified in early Chinese sources is Hu. In other words, the Hsiung-nu made their earliest formal appearance on the stage of Inner Asian history when Chinese history was just about to turn a new page – at the end of the Warring States period.

Interestingly enough, from early Chinese sources we know how China defended herself against the Hsiung-nu before we actually encounter the Hsiung-nu's armed incursions into China. In the late Warring States period three major states, Ch'in, Chao, and Yen, were all southern neighbors of the Hsiung-nu, and each as a defense against the nomads built a wall along its northern border. Of the three, Ch'in was the first to do so, probably no later than in 324 B.C.; but its entire walled defense system - in Lung-hsi (Kansu), Pei-ti (parts of Kansu and Ninghsia), and the Shang Commandery (parts of Shensi and Suiyuan) – was not completed until around 270 B.C. Next came the northern border wall of Chao, stretching from Yün-chung (in Suiyuan) through Yen-men to Tai (both in Shansi), which was built around 300.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia , pp. 118 - 150

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243049.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barfield, Thomas J., 1981, “The Hsiung-Imperial Confederacy: Organization and Foreign Policy,” Journal of Asian Studies 41, 1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bielenstein, Hans, 1956, Emperor Kuang-wu and the Northern Barbarians, The 17th Ernest Morrison Lecture in Ethnology, Canberra, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Boodberg, Peter A., 1936, “Two Notes on the History of the Chinese Frontier,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang, Hsing-t'ang, Shih Chi Han Shu Hsiung-nu ti-ming chin-shih. Taipei, 1963.Google Scholar

Chang, Wei-hua, Lun Han Wu-ti, Shanghai, 1957.Google Scholar

Cheng, Ch'in-jen, “Hsiung-nu,” Hsin Shih-tai, vol. 9, No. 4 (1969).Google Scholar

Chung-kuo, K'o-hsüeh Yüan K'ao-ku Yen-chiuSo,.Hsin Chung-kuo ti K'ao-ku Shou-huo, Peking, 1961.Google Scholar

Daffinà, Paolo, 1982, “The Han shu Hsi yü chuan retranslated. A Review Article,” T'oung Pao, 68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dubs, H. H., 1938–55, The History of the Former Han Dynasty. A Critical Translation with Annotations, (Baltimore, Md.).Google Scholar

Egami, Namio, Kita Ajiya Shi, Tokyo, 1956.Google Scholar

Fan, Yeh, Hou Han Shu, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Haloun, Gustav, 1937, “Zur Üse-Ḥsi Frage,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 91.Google Scholar

Harmatta, J. 1971, “Eine neue Quelle zur Geschichte der Seidenstrasse,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2.Google Scholar

Henning, W. B., 1948, “The Date of the Sogdian Ancient Letters,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12. [Discovers the Sogdian name of the Hsiung-nu. On the conclusions to be drawn from this discovery see Maenchen-Helfen, , 1955, and for a new interpretation see Harmatta, 1971].CrossRef Google Scholar

Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu tsung-chiao hsinyang chi ch'i liu-pien,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yü-yen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 42, Part 4 (1971).Google Scholar

Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu she-hui tsu-chih tè ch'u-pu yen-chiu,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yü-yen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 40, Part 2 (1969).Google Scholar

Hsieh, Jiann, “Hsiung-nu cheng-chih chih-tu tè yen-chiu,” Chung-yang Yen-chiu Yüan Li-shih Yüyen Yen-chiu So chi-k'an, vol. 41, Part 2 (1969).Google Scholar

Huang, Lin-shu, Ch'in Huang Ch'ang-ch'eng K'ao, revised edition, Hong Kong, 1972.Google Scholar

Hulsewé, A.F.P., 1979, China in Central Asia. The Early Stage: 125 B.C.–A.D. 23. An Annotated Translation of the Chapters 61 and 96 of the History of the Former Han Dynasty. With an Introduction by M.A.N. Loewe, Sinica Leidensia xiv. [A masterpiece of capital importance. For important discussions see Daffinà 1982, and Pulleyblank 1981].Google Scholar

Ise, Sentarō, Seiiki Keiei-shi no Kenkyū, Tokyo, 1962.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, Tomio, “Senpi Yūboku kokka no ryōiki,” Hokudai Shigaku, Oct., 1957.Google Scholar

Jettmar, Karl, 1951, “The Altai Before the Turks,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 23.Google Scholar

Jettmar, Karl, 1951–2, “Hunnen und Hiung-nu – ein archäologisches Problem,” Archiv für Völkerkunde 6/7.Google Scholar

Jettmar, Karl, 1964, Die früuhen Steppenvölker. Der eurasiatischer Tierstil. Entstehung und sozialer Hintergrund, Welt, Kunst (Baden-Baden). [Mainly on Scythians, Sarmatians, and Hsiung-nu. Beautiful illustrations, accurate, selective bibliography].Google Scholar

Kao, Ch'ü-hsün, 1960, “The Ching Lu Shen Shrines of Han Sword Worship in Hsiung-nu Religion,” Central Asiatic Journal 5.Google Scholar

Kubo, Yasuhiko, “Bo Ki Kō setchi no mokuteki ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 26, Nos. 2–3 (Jan., 1966).Google Scholar

Kuwabara, Jitsuzō, Chang Ch'ien Hsi-cheng K'ao. Translated into Chinese by Lien, Yang, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Lattimore, Owen, 1940, The Inner Asian Frontiers of China, American Geographical Society, Research Series No. 21 (New York).Google Scholar

Levin, M. G. – Potapov, L. P., 1956, The Peoples of Siberia, edited by Dunn, Stephen (Chicago).Google Scholar

Lin, Lū-chih, Hsiung-nu Shih, Hong Kong, Chung-Hua Wen-Hua, 1963.Google Scholar

Lü, Ssu-mien, Yen-shih Cha-chi, Shang-hai, 1937.Google Scholar

Ma, Ch'ang-shou, Pei-Ti yü Hsiung-nu, Peking, 1962.Google Scholar

Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1939, “The Ting-ling,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1944–5, “Huns and Hsiung-nu,” Byzantion 17.Google Scholar

Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1955, “Pseudo-Huns,” Central Asiatic Journal. 1.Google Scholar

Maenchen-Helfen, Otto, 1961, “Archaistic Names of the Hiung-nu,” Central Asiatic Journal 6.Google Scholar

Matsuda, Hisao, Kodai Tenzan no Rekishi Chirigaku Teki Kenkyū, Tokyo, revised edition, 1970.Google Scholar

McGovern, W. M., 1939, The Early Empires of Central Asia: A Study of the Scythians and the Huns and the Part they Played in World History (Chapel Hill, N.C.).Google Scholar

Minns, Ellis H., 1942, “The Art of the Northern Nomads,” Proceedings of the British Academy 28.Google Scholar

Mori, Masao, “Iwayuru ‘Hoku-Tei-Rei’ ‘Sei-Tei-Rei’ ni tsuite,” Takigawa Hakase Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshu, vol. i: Tōyōshi hen, 1957.Google Scholar

Mori, Masao, “Kyōdo no Kokka,” Shigaku Zasshi, vol. 59, No. 5 (May, 1950).Google Scholar

Mori, Masao, “On ‘Die 24 Ta-ch'en’ of Professor Pritsak,” [In Japanese] Shigaku Zasshi, Vol. 80, No. 1 (Jan., 1971).Google Scholar

Pan, Ku, Han Shu, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Pritsak, Omeljan, 1954, “Die 24 T'a-chên. Studie zur Geschichte des Verwaltungsaufbaus der Hsiung-nu Reiche,” Oriens Extremus 1.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, E. G., 1963, “The Consonantal System of Old Chinese, Pt. II. Appendix: The Hsiung-nu Language,” Asia Major New Series. 9.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, E. G., 1966, “Chinese and Indo-Europeans,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, E. G., 1970, “The Wusun and Sakas and the Yüeh-chih Migration,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, E. G., 1981, “Han China in Central Asia,” International History Review 3.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shiratori, Kurakichi, Hsiung-nu Min-tsu K'ao, translated into Chinese by Chienmin, Ho, Shanghai, 1936.Google Scholar

Ssu-ma, Ch'ien, Shih Chi, Peking, Chung-Hua Shu-chu, 1972.Google Scholar

Ssu-ma, Kuang, Tzu-chih T'ung-chien, Ch'u-pan, Ku-chi She edition, 1957.Google Scholar

Sun, Shou-tao, “Hsiung-nu Hsi-ch'a-kou Wen-hua Ku-mu ch'ün ti fa-hsien,” Wen-wu, 1960: 7/8.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Chusei, 1968, “China's Relations with Inner Asia: the Hsiung-nu, Tibet,” in The Chinese World Order, edited by Fairbank, John K. (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Tamura, Jitsuzō, Kita Ajiya ni okeru Rekishi Jekai no Keisei, Tokyo, 1956.Google Scholar

Tarn, W. W., 1938, The Greeks in Bactria and India, (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Taskin, V. S., 1968–73, Materialy po istorii sjunnu. (Po kitajskim istochnikom) (Moscow).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kansho Kyōdo to no Washin Jōyaku ni Kansuru ni san no mondai,” Shien, vol., 12, No. 2 (Dec, 1948).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo Bokkō Shiron,” Shien, vol. 32, No. 2 (March, 1971).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo no Jōkaku ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 16, No. 1 (June, 1955).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Kyōdo Zenu Sōzoku Kō,” Shien, vol. 20, No. 2 (Dec, 1959).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Minami Kyōdo no koko to Shinkō to no tsuite,” Shien, vol. 27, No. 1 (June, 1966).Google Scholar

Tezuka, Takayoshi, “Nitchikuō Hi no dokuritsu to Minami Kyōdo no Zenu Keishō ni tsuite,” Shien, vol. 25, No. 2 (Nov., 1964).Google Scholar

Ting, Ch'ien. Hsiung-nu Chuan K'ao-cheng, ts'ung-shu, P'eng-lai Ti-li edition, Chekiang Shu-chü, 1915.Google Scholar

Tseng, Yung, “Liao-ning Hsi-ch'a-kou ku-mu ch'ün wei Wu-huan i-chi lun,” K'ao-ku, 1961:6.Google Scholar

Tung-Hu Min-tsu K'ao, translated into Chinese by Chuang-yu, Fang, Shanghai, Commercial Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, “Gokanjo Minami Kyōdo Den no Kitazenu Ojoken Kiji ni tsuite,” Iwai Hakase Koki Kinen Ronbunshū, Tokyo, 1963.Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, “Gōkan Kōbutei no tai-Minami Kyōdo seisuku ni tsuite,” Shirin, 17:4 (October, 1932), and 18:1 (Jan., 1933).Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, “Gōkan makki yori Gokoran boppatsu ni itaru Kyōdo gobu no josei ni tsuite,” Shirin, 9:2 (Apr., 1934).Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, Kodai no Mōko, Tokyo, 1940.Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, “Kyōdo Jujuden Chimei Kō,” Takigawa Hakase Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshū, vol. i: Tōyōshi hen, 1957.Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, Kyōdō shi Kenkyū, Osaka, 1953.Google Scholar

Uchida, Gimpū, “Zenu no shōgō to Kyōdo Zenutei no ichi ni tsuite,” Tōhōgaku, No. 12 (1956).Google Scholar

Wang, Kuo-wei, Kuan-t'ang chi-lin, Taipei, Shih-chieh Shu-chü, 1961.Google Scholar

Watson, Burton, 1961, Records of the Grand Historian of China, translated from the Shih-chi, of Ssu-ma, Ch'ien (New York).Google Scholar

Wen, Ch'ung-i, “Han-tai Hsiung-nu tè she-hui tsu-chih yü wen-hua hsing-t'ai,” Pien-chiang Web-hua Lun-chi, edited by Shun-sheng, Ling et al., vol. 2, Taipei, 1953.Google Scholar

Yang, K'uan, Chan-kuo Shih, Shanghai, 1955.Google Scholar

Yasushi, Inoue and Shinobu, Iwamura, Seiiki, Tokyo, 1963.Google Scholar

Yü, Ying-shih, 1967, Trade and Expansion in China. A Study in the Structure of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations (Berkeley and Los Angeles).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.