Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T09:02:37.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Wood ant reproductive biology and social systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Arnaud Maeder
Affiliation:
Museum of Natural History, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
Daniel Cherix
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne, Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland
Christian Bernasconi
Affiliation:
Museum of Zoology, Lausanne, Switzerland
Anne Freitag
Affiliation:
Museum of Zoology, Lausanne, Switzerland
Samuel Ellis
Affiliation:
University of York, Heslington, York,UK
Jenni A. Stockan
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Elva J. H. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Transmitting genes from one generation to the next is the fundamental basis of natural selection and evolution. Understanding the reproductive biology of a species is, therefore, fundamental to understanding how the species evolved and how it is adapted to its environment. In eusocial insects such as the wood ants (Formica rufa group), reproduction is invested in a specialised reproductive caste, which produces both the workers and the next generation of sexual individuals. This chapter introduces the reproductive biology of wood ants, and also gives a general view of the life cycle of a wood ant colony to put the reproductive biology in context.

Wood ant life cycle

The wood ant life cycle is strongly linked to seasonal changes in the environment. Wood ant colonies generally first become active, after winter quiescence, in early spring when the sun begins to heat the nest and, in some locations, melt the snow (Figure 2.1). The timing of the beginning of activity is strongly influenced by the local climate, altitude and nest location. In Switzerland, for example, significant colony activity usually begins in March or April (Cherix 1981; Chauternes 1988).

On warm and sunny days, early in spring, worker activity begins and the internal temperature of the nest begins to rise to between 25°C and 30°C. Nest temperature remains at this level for the entire active season, even when, during early spring, the outside temperature is close to freezing (discussed in detail in Chapter 4) (Rosengren et al. 1987). Workers gather in the warm nest core and their nutrient-producing glands become more active, converting lipids and protein into food ready to be fed to queens and future larvae (Bausenwein 1960). The queen(s) remain(s) in the warm nest core for several days and lay ‘winter eggs’. The larvae hatching from these eggs are fed by the overwintering workers, usually developing into sexuals in about 6 weeks (Otto 2005). The queen(s) then retire(s) to the lower nest chambers to start to produce ‘summer eggs’, which usually develop into workers (Otto 2005).

Reproduction generally takes place in early summer, with thousands of sexual individuals flying away from their nests and participating in nuptial flights (e.g. Cherix et al. 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bausenwein, F. (1960) Untersuchungen über sekretorische Drüsen des Kopf und Brustabschnittes in der Formica rufa Grupe. Acta Societatis Entomologicae Cechosloveniae 57: 31–57.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, C., Maeder, A., Cherix, D. and Pamilo, P. (2005) Diversity and genetic structure of the wood ant Formica lugubris in unmanaged forests. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 42(3): 189–199.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. and Franks, N. R. (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brun, R. (1912) Weitere Beiträge zur Frage der Koloniegründung bei den Ameisen, mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Phylogenese des sozialen Parasitismus und der Dulosis bei Formica. Biologisches Zentralblatt Leipzig 32: 154–180, 216–226.Google Scholar
Buschinger, A. (1986) Evolution of social parasitism in ants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1: 155–160.Google Scholar
Casevitz-Weulersse, J. (1979) Fondations indépendantes des colonies et parasitisme social chez les fourmis (Hym.)Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 84: 218–232.Google Scholar
Chapuisat, M. (1998) Mating frequency of ant queens with alternative dispersal strategies, as revealed by microsatellite analysis of sperm. Molecular Ecology 7(9): 1097–1105.Google Scholar
Chauternes, D. (1988) Étude des relations dans une super-colonie de Formica lugubris Zett. Aspects Génétiques et comportementaux. Diploma, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cherix, D. (1980) Note Preliminaire sur la structure, la phénologie et le regime alimentaire d'une super-colonie de Formica lugubris Zett. Insectes Sociaux 27(3): 226–236.Google Scholar
Cherix, D. (1981) Contribution à la biologie et à l'écologie de Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Le probléme des super-colonies. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cherix, D. (1983) Intraspecific variations of alarm pheromones between two populations of the red wood ant Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 56: 57–65.Google Scholar
Cherix, D., Chautems, D., Fletcher, D. J. C., et al. (1989) Le vol nuptial chez Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). 1. Facteurs influençant l'apparition et l'envol des sexués. Actes Colloque Insectes Sociaux 5: 45–53.Google Scholar
Cherix, D., Chautems, D., Fletcher, D. J. C., et al. (1991) Alternative reproductive strategies in Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethology, Ecology, Evolution SI(1): 614–666.Google Scholar
Cherix, D., Fletcher, D. J. C., Chautems, D., et al. (1993) Attraction of sexes in Formica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 40: 319–324.Google Scholar
Cherix, D., Freitag, A. and Maeder, A. (2006) Fourmis des Bois. Lausanne, Switzerland: Musee cantonal de Zoologie.
Debout, G., Schatz, B., Elias, M. and Mckey, D. (2007) Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90: 319–348.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. and Robinson, E. J. H. (2014) Polydomy in red wood ants. Insectes Sociaux 61(2): 111–122.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. and Robinson, E. J. H (2015) The role of non-foraging nests in polydomous wood ant colonies. PLoS One 10(10): e0138321.Google Scholar
Escherich, K. (1906) Ueber die Biologie der Ameisen. 2. Teil. Die neueren Arbeiten (1905–1906). Zoologisches Zentralblatt 13: 405–440.Google Scholar
Escherich, K. (1917) Die Ameise, Schilderung ihrer Lebensweise. Zweite verbesserte und vermehrte Auflage. Braunschweig, Germany: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.
Forel, A. (1874) Les fourmis de la Suisse. La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland: Impr. Cooperative.
Fortelius, W. (2005) Mating behaviour in the polygynous/polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42(3): 213–224.Google Scholar
Fortelius, W., Rosengren, R., Cherix, D. and Chautems, D. (1993) Queen recruitment in a highly polygynous supercolony of Formica lugubris (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Oikos, 67(2): 193–200.Google Scholar
Goropashnaya, A. V., Fedorov, V. B. and Pamilo, P. (2004) Recent speciation in the Formica rufa group ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): inference from mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32(1): 198–206.Google Scholar
Gösswald, K. (1951) Die rote Waldameise im Dienste der Waldhygiene: Forstwirtschaftliche Bedeutung, Nutzung, Lebensweise, Zucht, Vermehrung and Schutz. Luneburg, Germany: Metta Kinau Verlag.
Gösswald, K. (1952) Über Versuche zur Verwendung von Hilfsameisen zwecks Vermehrung der nützlichen kleinen Roten Waldameise. Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Entomologie 34: 1–44.Google Scholar
Gösswald, K. (1989) Die Waldameise. Band I. Wiesbaden, Germany: Aula.
Heinze, J. and Tsuji, K. (1995) Ant reproductive strategies. Researches on Population Ecology Review 37: 135–149.Google Scholar
Helanterä, H. and Sundström, L. (2007) Worker reproduction in Formica ants. American Naturalist 170(1): E14–E25.Google Scholar
Higashi, S. (1983) Mechanism underlying the appearance of secondary polygyny in subgenus Formica ants. Environmental Science Hokkaido 6: 1–13.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O. (1990) The Ants. 1st edition. London: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
Horstmann, K., Rommel, M. and Blasinski, S. (1994) Untersuchungen zur Gründung neuer Völker bei Formica pratensis Retzius (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Waldhygiene 20: 43–56.Google Scholar
Huber, P. P. (1810) Recherches sur les mœurs des fourmis indigènes. Paris: Chez J. J. Paschoud.
Johnson, C. A., Sundström, L. and Billen, J. (2005) Development of alary muscles in single- and multiple-queen populations of the wood ant Formica truncorum. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42(3): 225–234.Google Scholar
Kadochová, Š. and Frouz, J. (2014) Thermoregulation strategies in ants in comparison to other social insects, with a focus on red wood ants (Formica rufa group). F1000Research 2: 280.Google Scholar
Keller, L. (1991) Queen number, mode of colony founding and queen reproductive success in ants (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethology, Ecology, Evolution 3(4): 307–316.Google Scholar
Keller, L. (1995) Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10(9): 355–360.Google Scholar
Kutter, H. (1969) Die sozialparasitischen Ameisen der Schweiz. Zürich: Neujahrsblatt der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft.
Löfqvist, J. and Bergström, G. (1980) Volatile communication substances in Dufour's gland of virgin females and old queens of the antFormica polyctena. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6: 309–320.Google Scholar
Mabelis, A. A. (1984) Interference between wood ants and other ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 34(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Mabelis, A. A. and Korczynska, J. (2001) Dispersal for survival: some observations on the trunk ant (Formica truncorum Fabricius). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 51: 299–321.Google Scholar
Maeder, A. (2006) Contribution to the conservation biology of the wood ant Formica lugubris (Hymenoptera: Formidae) in Switzerland. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mori, A. and Le Moli, F. (1998) Mating behaviour and colony founding of the slave-making ant Formica sanguinea (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 11: 235–245.Google Scholar
Mori, A., Grasso, D. A., Visicchio, R. and Le Moli, F. (2001) Comparison of reproductive strategies and raiding behaviour in facultative and obligatory slave-making ants: the case of Formica sanguinea and Polyergus rufescens. Insectes Sociaux 48: 302–314.Google Scholar
Otto, D. (2005) Die Roten Waldameisen. Hohenwarsleben, Germany: Westarp Wissenschaften.
Pamilo, P. (1990) Sex allocation and queen–worker conflict in polygynous ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27(1): 31–36.Google Scholar
Pamilo, P. (1993) Polyandry and allele frequency differences between the sexes in the antFormica aquilonia. Heredity 70(5): 472–480.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. H. (2014) Polydomy: the organisation and adaptive function of complex nest systems in ants. Current Opinion in Insect Science 5: 37–43.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R. and Pamilo, P. (1983) The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound building Formica ants. Acta Entomolgica Fennici 42: 65–77.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R., Fortelius, W., Lindström, K. and Luther, A. (1987) Phenology and causation of nest heating and thermoregulation in red wood ants of the Formica rufa group studied in coniferous forest habitats in southern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 24(2): 147–155.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R., Sundström, L. and Fortelius, W. (1993) Monogyny and polygyny in Formica ants: the result of alternative dispersal tactics. In Keller, L. (ed.), Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–333.
Schneider, M. A. (2002) Stratégies de reproduction et dispersion chez trois espèces de fourmis du sous-genre Coptoformica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). PhD Thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sundström, L. (1995) Dispersal polymorphism and physiological condition of males and females in the ant, Formica truncorum. Behavioural Ecology 6(2): 132–139.Google Scholar
Sundström, L., Seppä, P. and Pamilo, P. (2005) Genetic population structure and dispersal patterns in Formica ants: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42(3): 163–177.Google Scholar
Viehmeyer, H. (1908) Zur Koloniegründung der parasitischen Ameisen. Biologisches Zentralblatt 28: 18–32.Google Scholar
Walter, F., Fletcher, D. J. C., Chautems, D., et al. (1993) Identification of the sex pheromone of an ant, Formica lugubris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften 80: 30–34.Google Scholar
Wasmann, E. (1905) Nochmals zur Frage über die temporär gemischten Kolonien und den Ursprung des Sklaverei bei den Ameisen. Biologisches Centralblatt 25: 644–653.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1904a) Social parasitism among ants. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 4: 74–75.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1904b). A new type of social parasitism among ants. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 20: 347–375.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1905) Some remarks on temporary social parasitism and phylogeny of slavery among ants. Biologisches Centralblatt 25: 637–644.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1906) On the founding of colonies by queen ants, with special reference to the parasitic and slave-making species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 22: 33–105.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1910) Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×