Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T17:23:26.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal thought exceeds language-of-thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Angelica Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany angelica.kaufmann@gmail.com www.angelicakaufmann.com albert.newen@rub.de https://www.pe.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophie/ii/newen/kontakt.html.en
Albert Newen
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany angelica.kaufmann@gmail.com www.angelicakaufmann.com albert.newen@rub.de https://www.pe.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophie/ii/newen/kontakt.html.en

Abstract

Quilty-Dunn et al. claim that all complex infant and animal reasoning implicate language-of-thought hypothesis (LOTH)-like structures. We agree with the authors that the mental life of animals can be explained in representationalist terms, but we disagree with their idea that the complexity of mental representations is best explained by appealing to abstract concepts, and instead, we explain that it doesn't need to.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askew, J. A., & Morrogh-Bernard, H. C. (2016). Acoustic characteristics of long calls produced by male orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii): Advertising individual identity, context, and travel direction. Folia Primatologica, 87, 305319. doi:10.1159/000452304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, J. (2015). Analogue magnitude representations: A philosophical introduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 829855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J. (2017). Do nonhuman animals have a language of thought? In Andrews, K. & Beck, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of animal minds (pp. 4655). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742250-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. (2007). Thinking with maps. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 145182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. (2009). A language of baboon thought? In Lurz, R. (Ed.), The philosophy of animal minds (pp. 108127). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819001.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2020). Animal cognition and the evolution of human language: Why we cannot focus solely on communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1789), 20190046. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, J. A. (1975). Language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind, M. A. Boden (Ed.). MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lameira, A. R., & Call, J. (2018). Time-space-displaced responses in the orangutan vocal system. Science Advances, 4, 11. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau3401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newen, A., & Starzak, T. (2020). How to ascribe beliefs to animals. Mind and Language, 37(1), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spillman, B., van Noordwijk, M. A., Willems, E. P., Mitra Setia, T., Wipfli, U., & van Schaik, C. P. (2015). Validation of an acoustic location system to monitor Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) long calls. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 767776. doi:10.1002/ajp.22398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, , Damerius, , & Isler, . (2013). Wild orangutan males plan and communicate their travel direction one day in advance. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed