Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T16:56:51.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal thought exceeds language-of-thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Angelica Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany angelica.kaufmann@gmail.com www.angelicakaufmann.com albert.newen@rub.de https://www.pe.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophie/ii/newen/kontakt.html.en
Albert Newen
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany angelica.kaufmann@gmail.com www.angelicakaufmann.com albert.newen@rub.de https://www.pe.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophie/ii/newen/kontakt.html.en

Abstract

Quilty-Dunn et al. claim that all complex infant and animal reasoning implicate language-of-thought hypothesis (LOTH)-like structures. We agree with the authors that the mental life of animals can be explained in representationalist terms, but we disagree with their idea that the complexity of mental representations is best explained by appealing to abstract concepts, and instead, we explain that it doesn't need to.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable