Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Schumm, Walter R.
2015.
Navigating Treacherous Waters—One Researcher's 40 Years of Experience with Controversial Scientific Research,.
Comprehensive Psychology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. ,
p.
17.CP.4.24.
Schumm, Walter R.
2016.
A Conservative’s View from the Academic Trenches: Reply to Duarte, Crawford, Stern, Haidt, Jussim, and Tetlock (2015).
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science,
Vol. 06,
Issue. 04,
p.
149.
Stanford, Joseph B.
2016.
Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Vol. 4,
Issue. ,
Nugiel, Tehila
and
Beer, Jennifer S.
2020.
How Does Motivation Modulate the Operation of the Mentalizing Network in Person Evaluation?.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
664.
HODGE, David R.
2021.
Metaphysical Diversity in Mental Health Discourse: The Key to Scientific Progress in the Helping Professions.
Spiritual Psychology and Counseling,
p.
7.
Gladden, Paul R
2021.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
658.
Franks, Andrew S.
and
Hesami, Farhang
2021.
Seeking Evidence of The MAGA Cult and Trump Derangement Syndrome: An Examination of (A)symmetric Political Bias.
Societies,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
113.
Wijsen, Lisa D.
Borsboom, Denny
and
Alexandrova, Anna
2022.
Values in Psychometrics.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
788.
Costello, Thomas H.
2022.
Toward a Science of Clinical Psychology.
p.
395.
Metzgar, Matthew
and
McGowan, Mary Jo
2022.
Viewpoint Diversity at UNC Charlotte.
Acta Educationis Generalis,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
1.
Marshall, Renae
and
Burgess, Matthew G.
2022.
Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures.
Climatic Change,
Vol. 171,
Issue. 1-2,
Costello, Thomas H.
2023.
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology.
p.
585.
Rindermann, Heiner
2023.
Handbuch Qualität in pädagogischen Feldern.
p.
1.
Namuth, August
Brown, Mitch
Macchione, Alicia
and
Sacco, Donald
2023.
Assessing the Online Scientific Community’s Support for Various Reasons for Article Retraction: A Preliminary Survey.
ETHICS IN PROGRESS,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
50.
Redding, Richard E.
2023.
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology.
p.
79.
Frisby, Craig L.
2023.
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology.
p.
39.
Savolainen, Jukka
2024.
Unequal treatment under the flaw: race, crime & retractions.
Current Psychology,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 17,
p.
16002.
Hommel, Bernhard
2024.
Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science or Ideology?.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
558.
Stanovich, Keith E.
2024.
Toward a Psychology of Ideas Rather Than Demographics: Commentary on Hommel (2024).
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
580.
Maranto, Robert
Reilly, Wilfred
and
Wolf, Patrick J.
2024.
Which Police Departments Make Black Lives Matter?.
Administration & Society,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
282.
Target article
Political diversity will improve social psychological science1
Related commentaries (33)
A checklist to facilitate objective hypothesis testing in social psychology research
A conservative's social psychology
A predominance of self-identified Democrats is no evidence of a leftward bias
A “cohesive moral community” is already patrolling behavioral science1
Conservatism is not the missing viewpoint for true diversity
Diverse crowds using diverse methods improves the scientific dialectic
Diversity of depoliticization?
Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology
Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists
Lack of political diversity and the framing of findings in personality and clinical psychology
Liberal bias and the five-factor model
Liberals and conservatives: Non-convertible currencies
Meta-ethical pluralism: A cautionary tale about cohesive moral communities
Method and matter in the social sciences: Umbilically tied to the Enlightenment
Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity
On the history of political diversity in social psychology
Political attitudes in social environments
Political bias is tenacious
Political bias, explanatory depth, and narratives of progress
Political diversity versus stimuli diversity: Alternative ways to improve social psychological science
Political homogeneity can nurture threats to research validity
Political orientations do not cancel out, and politics is not about truth
QTIPs: Questionable theoretical and interpretive practices in social psychology
Recognizing and coping with our own prejudices: Fighting liberal bias without conservative input
Should social psychologists create a disciplinary affirmative action program for political conservatives?
Sociopolitical insularity is psychology's Achilles heel
The psychology of psychology: A thought experiment
Too paranoid to see progress: Social psychology is probably liberal, but it doesn't believe in progress
Towards a de-biased social psychology: The effects of ideological perspective go beyond politics
Welcoming conservatives to the field
What kinds of conservatives does social psychology lack, and why?
When theory trumps ideology: Lessons from evolutionary psychology
“Wait – You're a conservative?” Political diversity and the dilemma of disclosure
Author response
It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science1