Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Sproesser, Gudrun
Klusmann, Verena
Schupp, Harald T.
and
Renner, Britta
2017.
Self-Other Differences in Perceiving Why People Eat What They Eat.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 08,
Issue. ,
Redding, Richard E.
2023.
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology.
p.
929.
Wilkowski, Benjamin M.
Rivera, Emilio
Williamson, Laverl Z.
DiMariano, Erika
Meier, Brian P.
and
Fetterman, Adam
2023.
Toward a Comprehensive, Data-Driven Model of American Political Goals: Recognizing the “Values” and “Vices” Within Both Liberalism and Conservativism.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Frisby, Craig L.
2023.
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology.
p.
39.
Langlitz, Nicolas
and
de Althaus, Clemente
2024.
The moral economy of diversity: How the epistemic value of diversity transforms late modern knowledge cultures.
History of the Human Sciences,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Target article
Political diversity will improve social psychological science1
Related commentaries (33)
A checklist to facilitate objective hypothesis testing in social psychology research
A conservative's social psychology
A predominance of self-identified Democrats is no evidence of a leftward bias
A “cohesive moral community” is already patrolling behavioral science1
Conservatism is not the missing viewpoint for true diversity
Diverse crowds using diverse methods improves the scientific dialectic
Diversity of depoliticization?
Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology
Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists
Lack of political diversity and the framing of findings in personality and clinical psychology
Liberal bias and the five-factor model
Liberals and conservatives: Non-convertible currencies
Meta-ethical pluralism: A cautionary tale about cohesive moral communities
Method and matter in the social sciences: Umbilically tied to the Enlightenment
Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity
On the history of political diversity in social psychology
Political attitudes in social environments
Political bias is tenacious
Political bias, explanatory depth, and narratives of progress
Political diversity versus stimuli diversity: Alternative ways to improve social psychological science
Political homogeneity can nurture threats to research validity
Political orientations do not cancel out, and politics is not about truth
QTIPs: Questionable theoretical and interpretive practices in social psychology
Recognizing and coping with our own prejudices: Fighting liberal bias without conservative input
Should social psychologists create a disciplinary affirmative action program for political conservatives?
Sociopolitical insularity is psychology's Achilles heel
The psychology of psychology: A thought experiment
Too paranoid to see progress: Social psychology is probably liberal, but it doesn't believe in progress
Towards a de-biased social psychology: The effects of ideological perspective go beyond politics
Welcoming conservatives to the field
What kinds of conservatives does social psychology lack, and why?
When theory trumps ideology: Lessons from evolutionary psychology
“Wait – You're a conservative?” Political diversity and the dilemma of disclosure
Author response
It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science1