Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T05:21:42.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Debate 36B - Is Hormonal Therapy the Best Therapy for Chemo-resistant Endometrial Cancer?

No

from Section IV - Endometrial Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2023

Dennis S. Chi
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Nisha Lakhi
Affiliation:
Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island
Nicoletta Colombo
Affiliation:
University of Milan-Bicocca
Get access

Summary

For recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer (EC), carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel remains the current first-line standard of care globally. In the NRG Oncology/GOG209 phase III trial, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 13 months and 37 months respectively (NRG/GOG209) [1]. Whilst hormonal therapy (HT) may be the preferred front-line systemic therapy for selected patients with low-grade EC carcinomas without rapidly progressive disease [2], we argue that the efficacy in advanced/recurrent EC post chemotherapy (i.e., chemo-resistant) is limited and alternative options should now be considered in clinical practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miller, DS, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced endometrial cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a phase III trial (NRG Oncology/GOG0209). J Clin Oncol 2020;38(33):38413850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Concin, N, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021;31(1):1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethier, JL, et al. Is hormonal therapy effective in advanced endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147(1):158166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mileshkin, L, et al. Phase 2 study of anastrozole in recurrent estrogen (ER)/progesterone (PR) positive endometrial cancer: The PARAGON trial–ANZGOG 0903. Gynecol Oncol 2019;154(1):2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, MR, et al. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial of palbociclib combined with letrozole (L) in patients (pts) with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER plus) advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC): NSGO- PALEO/ENGOT-EN3 trial. Ann Oncol 2020;31(Suppl. 4):S1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/annonc/annonc325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon-Castillo, A, et al. Molecular classification of the PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer: impact on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3388e3397. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oaknin, A, et al. Clinical activity and safety of the anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody dostarlimab for patients with recurrent or advanced mismatch repaire-deficient endometrial cancer: a nonrandomized phase 1 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6v11:1766e1772. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fader, AN, et al. Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel-trastuzumab in advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress Her2/Neu (NCT01367002): updated overall survival analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(15):3928e3935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omalley, D, et al. KEYNOTE 158. Ann Oncol 2019;30(Suppl. 5):v403ev404. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz25Google Scholar
Oaknin, A, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or proficient (MMRp) endometrial cancer (EC): results from GARNET. Ann Oncol 2020;31(Suppl. 4):S1142S1215. 10.1016/annonc/annonc325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makker, V, et al. Study 309–KEYNOTE-775 Investigators. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 2022;386(5):437448.Google Scholar
Colombo, N, et al. Outcomes by histology and prior therapy with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (Study 309/KEYNOTE-775). Ann Oncol 2021;32(Suppl. 5):S725S772. https://doi.org/10.1016/annonc/annonc703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×