Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- 3 Researching ‘found’ or ‘pre-existing’ visual materials
- 4 A visual and multimodal model for analyzing online environments
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
3 - Researching ‘found’ or ‘pre-existing’ visual materials
from Part II - The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Reframing Visual Social Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Part I Remodeling visual social science
- Part II The visual researcher as collector and interpreter
- 3 Researching ‘found’ or ‘pre-existing’ visual materials
- 4 A visual and multimodal model for analyzing online environments
- Part III The visual researcher as producer, facilitator and communicator
- Part IV Applications / case studies
- Part V Visual research in a wider perspective
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reframing Visual Social ScienceTowards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology, pp. 47 - 64Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
6 References
Ball, M. and Smith, G. (2011) ‘Ethnomethodology and the Visual: Practices of Looking, Visualization, and Embodied Action.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 392–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barndt, D. (1997) ‘Zooming out/Zooming in: Visualizing Globalization.’ Visual Sociology, 12: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, P. (2001) ‘Content Analysis of Visual Images. ’ In: Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 10−34.Google Scholar
Berger, A. A. (1998) Media Research Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialostocki, J. (1973) ‘Iconography.’ In: Wiener, P. (ed.) Dictionary of the History of Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, Vol. 2, pp. 524–42.Google Scholar
Bogdan, R. and Marshall, A. (1997) ‘Views of the Asylum: Picture Postcard Depictions of Institutions for People with Mental Disorders in the Early 20th Century.’ Visual Sociology, 12: 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousé, D. (2003) ‘False Intimacy: Close-Ups and Viewer Involvement in Wildlife Films.’ Visual Studies, 18: 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, C. and Grosvenor, I. (2007) ‘The Progressive Image in the History of Education: Stories of Two Schools.’ Visual Studies 22: 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalfen, R. (1987) Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Google Scholar
Collier, M. (2001) ‘Approaches to Analysis in Visual Anthropology.’ In: Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 35–60Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1987) ‘Rhetorical Figures in the Advertising Image.’ In: Umiker-Sebeok, J. (ed.) Marketing and Semiotics: New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, S. (1998) ‘The Power to Fix the Gaze: Gender and Class in Victorian Photographs of Pit-Brown Women.’ Visual Sociology, 13: 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, M. (2007) ‘Images of Stillbirth: Memory, Mourning and Memorial.’ Visual Studies, 22: 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2001) ‘Practices of Seeing Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.’ In: Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 157–82.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (2007) ‘Advertising Images as Social Indicators: Depictions of Blacks in LIFE Magazine, 1936–2000.’ Visual Studies, 22: 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagaman, D. (1993) ‘The Joy of Victory, the Agony of Defeat: Stereotypes in Newspaper Sports Feature Photographs.’ Visual Sociology, 8: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960) ‘Closing Statements: Linguistics and Poetics.’ In: Sebeok, T. A., Style In Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lackey, C. (2001) ‘Visualizing White-Collar Crime: Generic Imagery in Popular Film.’ Visual Sociology, 16: 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, H. (1999) ‘Voices of Pacific Youth: Video Research as a Tool for Youth Expression.’ Visual Sociology, 14: 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E. (1994) ‘Images in Struggle: Photographs of Colorado Coal Camps.’ Visual Sociology, 9: 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E. (2004) ‘Looking at Discipline, Looking at Labor: Photographic Representations of Indian Boarding Schools.’ Visual Studies, 19: 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) (2011) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, K. (2006) ‘Photographs of a Japanese Canadian Internment Camp: Mourning Loss and Invoking a Future.’ Visual Studies, 21: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, W. M. (1992) ‘Representing Blackness in the White Imagination: Images of “Happy Darkeys” in Popular Culture, 1893–1917.’ Visual Sociology, 7: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, M. (2011) ‘Iconography and Iconology as a Visual Method and Approach.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 283–97.Google Scholar
Musello, C. (1979) ‘Family Photography.’ In: Wagner, J. (ed.) Images of Information. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 101–18Google Scholar
Nöth, W. (2011) ‘Visual Semiotics: Key Features and an Application to Picture Ads.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 298–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1939) Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1955) ‘Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the Study of Renaissance Art.’ In: Panofsky, E., Meaning in the Visual Arts. University of Chicago Press, pp. 26–41.Google Scholar
Papson, S. (1991) ‘Looking at Nature: The Politics of Landscape Photography.’ Visual Sociology, 6: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2008) ‘A Private Visual Practice Going Public? Social Functions and Sociological Research Opportunities of Web-Based Family Photography.’ Visual Studies, 23: 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. (2012) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, 3rd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schrøder, K. (1987) ‘Snapshot Fables: The True Nature of Magazine Advertisements.’ In: Henny, L. (ed.) Semiotics of Advertisements, International Studies in Visual Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 1. Aachen: Edition Herodot, Rader Verlag, pp. 78–93.Google Scholar
Suonpää, J. (2000) ‘Taming Predators Through Photograph.’ Visual Sociology, 15: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, K. G. and Shepperson, A. (2002) ‘Where’s Shaka Zulu?: Shaka Zulu as an Intervention in Contemporary Political Discourse.’ Visual Studies, 17: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.) (2001) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Straten, R. (1994) An Introduction to Iconography. Abingdon/New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Weakland, J. (1975) ‘Feature Films as Cultural Documents.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–52.Google Scholar
White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, MD/London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (2001) ‘Reflections on “The Looking Glass War”: Photography, Espionage and the Cold War.’ Visual Sociology, 16: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar