Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York/London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Collier, J. (1975) ‘Photography and Visual Anthropology.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, revised and expanded edition. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Corsaro, W. (1982) ‘Something Old and Something New: The Importance of Prior Ethnography in the Collection and Analysis of Audiovisual Data.’ Sociological Methods & Research 11: 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debord, G. (1956) ‘Theory of the Dérive,’ Les Lèvres Nues 9 (November); reprinted in Internationale Situationniste 2 (December 1958), translated by Knabb, Ken.Google Scholar

Harper, D. (2012) ‘A Ten Step Methodology,’ presentation at the IVSA conference in Brooklyn.Google Scholar

Klett, M. (2011) ‘Repeat Photography in Landscape Research.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 114–31.Google Scholar

Krase, J. and Shortell, T. (2011) ‘On the Spatial Semiotics of Vernacular Landscapes in Global Cities.’ Visual Communication, 10 (3): 367–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPhail, C. and Wohlstein, R. (1982) ‘Using Film to Analyze Pedestrian Behavior.’ Sociological Methods & Research, 10 (3): 347–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rieger, J. (2011) ‘Rephotography for Documenting Social Change.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 132–49.Google Scholar

Rothman, A. (1964) ‘The Value of Photographic Technique in Plotting Sociometric Interaction.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Anthropological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Scherer, S. (1975) ‘A Photographic Method for Recording and Evaluation of Cross-Cultural Proxemic Interaction Patterns.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 365–72.Google Scholar

Sorenson, E. and Jablonko, A. (1975) ‘Research Filming of Naturally Occurring Phenomena: Basic Strategies.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology, The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 151–63.Google Scholar

Suchar, C. (1997) ‘Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts.’ Qualitative Research, 20(1): 33–55.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar

Zube, E. (1979) ‘Pedestrians and Wind.’ In: Wagner, J. (ed.) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills/London: Sage, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar

Chalfen, R. (1987) Snapshot Versions of Life, Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Google Scholar

Chalfen, R. (2011) ‘Differentiating Practices of Participatory Visual Media Production.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalfen, R., Sherman, L. and Rich, M. (2010) ‘VIA’s Visual Voices: The Awareness of a Dedicated Audience for Voices in Patient Video Narratives.’ Visual Studies, 25(3): 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaplin, E. (2011) ‘The Photo Diary as an Autoethnographic Method.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 241–62.Google Scholar

Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, New York/London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Later revised with Collier, Malcolm (1986), University of New Mexico Press.)Google Scholar

Flaherty, R. (1922) Nanook of the North, film, 55 mins., USA: Revillon Frères.Google Scholar

Harper, D. (2002) ‘Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.’ Visual Studies, 17(1): pp. 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurworth, R. (2003) ‘Photo-Interviewing for Research.’ Social Research Update, 40 [Online]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.pdf [accessed October 7, 2012].Google Scholar

Krebs, S. (1975) ‘The Film Elicitation Technique.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapenta, F. (2011) ‘Some Theoretical and Methodological Views on Photo-Elicitation.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 201–13.Google Scholar

Lorenz, L. S. (2010) ‘Brain Injury Survivors: Narratives of Rehabilitation and Healing.’ In: Berger, R. J. (ed.) Disability in Society. Boulder, CO/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Mitchell, C. and de Lange, N. (2011) ‘Community-Based Participatory Video and Social Action in Rural South Africa.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 171–85.Google Scholar

Pauwels, L. (1996) De Verbeelde Samenleving, Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie, Leuven/Apeldoorn: Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij Garant.Google Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2012) ‘Conceptualizing the “Visual Essay” as a Way of Generating and Imparting Sociological Insight: Issues, Formats and Realizations.’ Sociological Research Online, 17(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segers, J. (1983) Sociologische Onderzoeksmethoden: Deel 1, Inleiding tot de structuur van het onderzoeksproces en tot de methoden van dataverzameling, 3rd en. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences, Beverly Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. (1997) ‘The Unavoidable Intervention of Educational Research: A Framework for Reconsidering Researcher-Practitioner Cooperation.’ Educational Researcher, 26 (7), pp. 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, C. (1999) ‘Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women’s Health.’ Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2): 185–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, C. and Burris, M. A. (1994) ‘Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation.’ Health Education & Behavior, 21(2): 171–86.Google ScholarPubMed

Worth, S. and Adair, J. (1972) Through Navajo Eyes: An Exploration in Film Communication and Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [See also: revised edition: Worth, S., Adair, J., and Chalfen, R., 1997]Google Scholar

Almasy, P. (1990) Le photojournalisme: informer en écrivant avec des images. Paris: Centre de Formation et de Perfectionnement des Journalistes.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1999) ‘Rhetoric of the Image.’ In: Evans, J. and Hall, S. (eds.) Visual Culture: The Reader, London: Sage, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar

Bot, M. (1984) Miserere, de grote boetebedevaarten in Europa, Dutch edition. Rotterdam: M. Bot.Google Scholar

Bot, M. (1985) Miserere: The Great Pilgrimages of Penance in Europe, English edition (also in French and German). Rotterdam: M. Bot.Google Scholar

Bot, M. (1988) Bezwaard Bestaan, foto’s en verhalen over verstandelijk gehandicapten [The Burden of Existence: Photos and Stories about the Mentally Handicapped]. Rotterdam: M. Bot.Google Scholar

Bot, M. (1998) Een Laatste Groet, uitvaart- en rouwrituelen in multicultureel Nederland [A Last Farewell, Death Rituals in the Multicultural Netherlands]. Rotterdam: M. Bot.Google Scholar

Bot, M. (2004) Geliefden / Timeless Love. Rotterdam: M. Bot.Google Scholar

Frank, R. (1959) The Americans. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Grady, J. (1991) ‘The Visual Essay and Sociology.’ Visual Sociology 6(2): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, J. (2006) ‘Edward Tufte and the Promise of a Visual Social Science.’ In: Pauwels, L. (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, pp. 222–65.Google Scholar

Greenblat, C. (2004) Alive with Alzheimer’s. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Greenblat, C. (2012) Love, Loss, and Laughter: Seeing Alzheimer’s Differently, Lyons Press.Google Scholar

Harper, D. (1988) ’Visual Sociology: Expanding Sociological Vision.’ The American Sociologist 19(1): 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henny, Leonard (1986) ‘A Short History of Visual Sociology.’ Current Sociology 34(3): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lam, I. (1994) De mythe van het ‘lege nest’: over echtpaarrelaties als de kinderen het huis uit zijn. Utrecht: ISOR.Google Scholar

MacDougall, D. (2011) ‘Anthropological Filmmaking: An Empirical Art.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Meyer, P. (1995) I Photograph to Remember. Interactive CD-ROM for PC Windows (Voyager CityRom).Google Scholar

Monaco, J. (2000) How to Read a Film. The World of Movies, Media, and Multimedia: Language, History, Theory, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, B. (1994) Blurred Boundaries: Questions of Meaning in Contemporary Culture, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Pauwels, L. (1993) ‘The Visual Essay: Affinities and Divergences between the Social Scientific and the Social Documentary Modes.’ Visual Anthropology 6(2): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2002) ‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’ Visual Studies 17(2): 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2005) ‘Culture, Community and Disease Control: Photo Essay.’ International Journal of Epidemiology 34(3): 534–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2006) ‘A Theoretical Framework for Assessing Visual Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communications.’ In: Pauwels, L. (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2009) ‘Street Discourse: A Visual Essay on Urban Signification’. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 1: 263–72. Available from: www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se [accessed April 22, 2015].Google Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2010) ‘Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.’ Sociological Methods & Research 38(4): 545–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwels, L. (2011) ‘Researching Websites as Social and Cultural Expressions: Methodological Predicaments and a Multimodal Model for Analysis.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Plantinga, C. (1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, G. (2011) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, 3rd edn., London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.Google Scholar

Willett, J. (1997) Heartfield versus Hitler. Paris: Éditions Hazan.Google Scholar

Aibel, R., Levin, B., Musello, C. and Ruby, J. (1983) A Country Auction: The Paul V. Leitzel Estate Sale. Film, 56 mins, Pennsylvania State University, Audiovisual Services.Google Scholar

Asch, T. and Chagnon, N. (1975) The Ax Fight. Film, 30 mins, University Park, PA / Watertown, MA: Center for Documentary Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University / Documentary Educational Resources.Google Scholar

Bazin, A. (1975) Qu’est-ce que le cinema? Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar

Biella, P., Chagnon, N. and Seaman, G. (1997) Yanomamö Interactive: The Ax Fight. CD-ROM, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Boonzajer, Flaes R. and Rens, M. (1986) Polka: Roots of Conjunto Accordion Playing in South Texas. Video, color, 50 mins, University of Amsterdam, Center for Visual Anthropology.Google Scholar

Chiozzi, P. (1989) ‘Reflections on Ethnographic Film with a General Bibliography.’ Visual Anthropology, 2(1): 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, New York/London, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Later revised with Malcolm Collier (1986), University of New Mexico Press.)Google Scholar

Crawford, P. I. (1992) ‘Film as Discourse: The Invention of Anthropological Realities.’ In: Crawford, P. I. and Turton, D. (eds.) Film as Ethnography. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

De Heusch, L. (1988) ‘Ethnographic and Sociological Films.’ Visual Anthropology, 1(2): 99–156 (reprint of a 1962 UNESCO paper).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folmer, P. (1992) ‘Het postmodernisme en de etnografische film,’ paper methodologie, (http://ruls01.fsw.leidenuniv.nl/-etno/pomo.html) [accessed March 25, 2003].Google Scholar

Lajoux, J. D. (1975) ‘Ethnographic Film and History.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 167–84.Google Scholar

MacDougall, D. (1975) ‘Beyond Observational Cinema.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 109–24.Google Scholar

Machuca, M., and Ruby, J. (2012) Reflexive Musings: A Country AuctionStudy Film. Film, 47 mins (www.der.org/films/a-country-auction.html) [accessed April 20, 2015].Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1963) ‘Anthropology and the Camera.’ In: Morgan, W. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Photography, New York: Greystone Press, Vol. 1, pp.166–84.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1975) ‘Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris, Mouton, pp. 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijland, D., in cooperation with Platenkamp, J. (1985) Tobelo Marriage. Film 16mm, color, 108 mins, ICA.Google Scholar

Nijland, D. (1989) Schaduwen en Werkelijkheid: Cultureel bepaald kennen,waarnemen, nonverbaal communiceren en onderzoek daarvan via de terugvertoning van de etnografische film ‘Tobelo Marriage’, PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.Google Scholar

Prost, J. (1975) ‘Filming Body Behavior,’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris, Mouton: 325–63.Google Scholar

Rollwagen, J. (ed.) (1988) Anthropological Filmmaking: Anthropological Perspectives on the Production of Film and Video for General Public Audiences. Chur/London: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, R. (1989) ‘Grief and the Headhunter’s Rage.’ In: Rosaldo, R. Culture and Truth. Boston, MA: Beacon, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Terrenoire, J.-P. (1991) Mise en images d’un rituel: La messe catholique à la télévision française, un approche sociologique. Video article, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Wolf, G. (1967) Der wissenschaftliche Dokumentationsfilm und die Encyclopaedia Cinematographica. Munich: Johann Ambrosius Barth; Göttingen: Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, T. (1992) ‘Television narrative and ethnographic film.’ In: Crawford, P. I. & Turton, D. (eds.) Film as Ethnography. Manchester and New York, Manchester University Press: 274–282.Google Scholar

Young, C. (1975) ‘Observational cinema.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. Den Haag/Paris: Mouton, 65–79.Google Scholar