Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:18:54.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Remodeling visual social science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Luc Pauwels
Luc Pauwels
Affiliation:
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reframing Visual Social Science
Towards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology
 , pp. 1 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 References

Ball, M. and Smith, G. (1992) Analyzing Visual Data. Newbury Park, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M. (2001) Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M. (2007) Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1986) Doing Things Together: Selected Papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Chaplin, E. (1994) Sociology and Visual Representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York/London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Revised and expanded edition with Collier, M. (1986), Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Curry, T. and Clarke, A. (1983) [1977] Introducing Visual Sociology. 2nd edn. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
De Heusch, L. (1988) ‘The Cinema and Social Science: A Survey of Ethnographic and Sociological Films.’ Visual Anthropology 1: 99–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmison, M. and Smith, P. (2000) Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A. and Ravetz, A. (eds.) (2004) Visualizing Anthropology: Experimenting with Image-Based Ethnography. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. (ed.) (2007) Visual Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harper, D. (2012) Visual Sociology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, K. (2006) [1976] Ethnographic Film, revised edn. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Henny, L. (1986) ‘Theory and Practice of Visual Sociology.’ Current Sociology 34(3): 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, P. (ed.) (2003) [1975] Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd ed. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
MacDougall, D. and Taylor, L. (eds.) (1998) Transcultural Cinema. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (2011) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. (1963) ‘Anthropology and the Camera.’ In: Morgan, W. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Photography, New York: Greystone Press, pp. 166–84.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1975) ‘Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) (2003) Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd edn. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. and Bateson, G. (1985) [1942] Balinese Character: A Photographic Analysis. New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. (2011) Doing Visual Research. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1996) De Verbeelde Samenleving: Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002) ‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’ Visual Studies 17: 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2010) ‘Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.’ Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4): 545–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S. (2001) Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Prosser, J. (ed.) (2000) Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In: Hockings, P. (2003) [1975] (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology, 3rd edn. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (1986) ‘The Future of Anthropological Cinema: A Modest Polemic.’ Visual Sociology Review 1: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. (2011) Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Visions, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stanczak, G. (ed.) (2007) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.Google Scholar

5 References

Balikci, A. (1975) ‘Reconstructing Cultures on Film.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton Publishers, pp. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1986) Doing Things Together: Selected Papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, B. (2001) ‘Doing Drag: A Visual Case Study of Gender Performance and Gay Masculinities.’ Visual Sociology, 16: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambrosio, A., Jacobi, D. and Keating, P. (1993) ‘Ehrlich’s “Beautiful Pictures” and the Controversial Beginnings of Immunological Imagery.’ ISIS 1993, 84: 662–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Chalfen, R. (1987) Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Google Scholar
Chalfen, R. (2003) ‘Celebrating Life after Death: The Appearance of Snapshots in Japanese Pet Gravesites.’ Visual Studies, 18: 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark-Ibanez, M. (2007) ‘Inner-City Children in Sharper Focus: Sociology of Childhood and Photo Elicitation Interviews.’ In: Stanczak, G. (ed.) Visual Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 167–98.Google Scholar
Collier, J. (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York/London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Revised and expanded edition with Collier, M. (1986). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.)Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. (1982) ‘Something Old and Something New: The Importance of Prior Ethnography in the Collection and Analysis of Audiovisual Data.’ Sociological Methods & Research (‘Special Issue on Sound-Image Records in Social Interaction Research’), 11: 145–66.Google Scholar
David, E. (2007) ‘Signs of Resistance: Marking Public Space Through a Renewed Cultural Activism.’ In: Stanczak, G. (ed.) Visual Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 225–54.Google Scholar
Diem-Wille, Gertrude (2001) ‘A Therapeutic Perspective: The Use of Drawings in Child Psychoanalysis and Social Science.’ In: Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 157–82.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. (1990) ‘Photographic “Types”: The Pursuit of Method.’ Visual Anthropology, 3: 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, C. M. (1990) ‘Impressions of the African Past: Interpreting Ethnographic Photographs from Cameroon.’ Visual Anthropology, 3: 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, S. J. (2007) ‘Using Photography in Studies of Immigrant Communities: Reflecting across Projects and Populations.’ In: Stanczak, G. (ed.), Visual Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 141–66.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1995) ‘Seeing in Depth.’ Social Studies of Science 25: 237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, D. N. and Pea, R. D. (1995) ‘Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology.’ The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4: 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1991) ‘The Visual Essay and Sociology.’ Visual Sociology, 6: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (2006) ‘Edward Tufte and the Promise of a Visual Social Science.’ In: Pauwels, L. (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication. Hanover, NH/London: Dartmouth College Press – University Press of New England, pp. 222–65.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A. (ed.) (1982) ‘Special Issue on Sound-Image Records in Social Interaction Research.’ Sociological Methods & Research, 11: 115–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. D. (1998) ‘Photography and the “Natives”: Examining the Hidden Curriculum of Photographs in Introductory Anthropology Texts.’ Visual Sociology, 13(2): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D. (2002) ‘Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.’ Visual Studies, 17: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D. and Faccioli, P. (2000) ‘Small, Silly Insults: Mutual Seduction and Misogyny: The Interpretation of Italian Advertising Signs.’ Visual Sociology, 15: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hethorn, J. and Kaiser, S. (1999) ‘Youth Style: Articulating Cultural Anxiety.’ Visual Sociology, 14: 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knor-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krase, J. (1997) ‘Polish and Italian Vernacular Landscapes in Brooklyn.’ Polish American Studies, 54: 9–31.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985) ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.’ Social Studies of Science, 15: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, D. (1975) ‘Beyond Observational Cinema.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague/Paris: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 109–24.Google Scholar
McPhail, C. and Wohlstein, R. T. (1982) ‘Using Film to Analyze Pedestrian Behavior,’ Sociological Methods & Research, 10: 347–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. (1992) The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mizen, P. (2005) ‘A Little “Light Work”? Children’s Images of Their Labor.’ Visual Studies, 20: 124–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niesyto, H. (2000) ‘Youth Research on Video Self-Productions: Reflections on a Social Aesthetic Approach.’ Visual Sociology, 15: 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E. R. (2001) ‘Social Change at Bike Week.’ Visual Sociology, 16: 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1993) ‘The Visual Essay: Affinities and Divergences between the Social Scientific and the Social Documentary Modes.’ Visual Anthropology, 6: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (1996) De Verbeelde Samenleving: Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Pinney, C. (1990) ‘Classification and Fantasy in the Photographic Construction of Caste and Tribe.’ Visual Anthropology, 3: 259–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, J. (2007) ‘Visual Methods and the Visual Culture of Schools.’ Visual Studies, 22: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, M. and Chalfen, R. (1999) ‘Showing and Telling Asthma: Children Teaching Physicians with Visual Narrative.’ Visual Sociology, 14: 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, J. H. (1996) ‘Photographing Social Change.’ Visual Sociology, 11: 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, J. H. (2003) ‘A Retrospective Visual Study of Social Change: The Pulp-Logging Industry in an Upper Peninsula Michigan County.’ Visual Studies, 18: 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1989) ‘Grief and the Headhunter’s Rage.’ In: Culture and Truth. London/New York: Routledge, 1–21.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2006) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Methods, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles in Visual Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. (2002) ‘Pictures at a Demonstration.’ Visual Studies, 17: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. L., Moriarty, S., Barbatsis, G. and Kenney, K. (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sorenson, E. R. and Jablonko, A. (1975) ‘Research Filming of Naturally Occurring Phenomena: Basic Strategies.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles in Visual Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 151–63.Google Scholar
Suchar, C. (1988) ‘Photographing the Changing Material Culture of a Gentrified Community.’ Visual Sociology Review, 3: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchar, C. (1992) ‘Icons and Images of Gentrification: The Changed Material Culture of an Urban Community.’ In: Hutchinson, R. (ed.) Gentrification and Urban Change: Research in Urban Sociology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Suchar, C. (1997) ‘Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts.’ Qualitative Research, 20(1): 33–22Google Scholar
Synnott, A. (1985) ‘Symbolic Replica: A Sociology of Cemeteries.’ International Journal of Visual Sociology, 2: 46–56.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1997) Visual Explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1999) ‘Beyond the Body in a Box: Visualizing Contexts of Children’s Action.’ Visual Sociology, 14: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worth, S. and Adair, J. (1975) Through Navajo Eyes: An Exploration in Film Communication and Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zube, E. (1979) ‘Pedestrians and Wind.’ In: Wagner, J. W. (ed.) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×