Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:29:43.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Visual research in a wider perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Luc Pauwels
Luc Pauwels
Affiliation:
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reframing Visual Social Science
Towards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology
 , pp. 255 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10 References

AAA (2012) Principles of Professional Responsibility, American Anthropological Association. Available from: http://ethics.aaanet.org/category/statement [accessed April 19, 2015].Google Scholar
ASA (1999) Code of Ethics. American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1986) Doing Things Together: Selected Papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. (1984) Leren Observeren: een introduktie in het gebruik van systematische gedragsobservaties, 3rd edn. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
BSA (2002) Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association, March 2002 (Appendix updated May 2004).Google Scholar
ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) (no date) Research Ethics Framework. Available from: www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6–11291.pdf [accessed February 7, 2007].Google Scholar
Ess, C. and the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) (2002) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee, approved by AoIR, November 27, 2002. Available from: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf [accessed August 23, 2006].Google Scholar
European Science Foundation (2000) Good Scientific Practice in Research and Scholarship. Available from: www.esf.org/sciencepolicy/170/ESPB10.pdf [accessed August 24, 2006].Google Scholar
Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2000) ‘Globalization of Research and International Standards of Ethics in Anthropology.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 925: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, S. (1989) ‘Ethical Issues in Visual Field Work.’ In: Blank, G., McCarthy, J. and Brent, E. (eds.) New Technology in Sociology: Practical Applications in Research and Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A. (1982) ‘Whose Privacy? What Harm?’ Sociological Methods & Research 11(2): 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, K. (1976) Ethnographic Film. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2000) Virtual Ethnography. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IVSA (International Visual Sociology Association) (2009) Code of Research Ethics and Guidelines. Available from: http://visualsociology.org/about/item/introduction.html [accessed April 20, 2015].Google Scholar
Kjølseth, R. (1983) ‘Evidence and Imagination: Photography in Enquiry.’ International Journal of Visual Sociology 1: 20–4.Google Scholar
Lee, R. M. (2000) Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. (2003) ‘Human Subjects Protections, Institutional Review Boards, and Cultural Anthropological Research.’ Anthropological Quarterly 76(2): 269–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papademas, D. (2004) ‘Editor’s Introduction: Ethics in Visual Research.’ Visual Studies 19(2): 122–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2006) ‘Ethical Issues of Online (Visual) Research.’ Visual Anthropology 19(3–4): 365–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J. (1975) ‘Videotape: New Techniques of Observation and Analysis in Anthropology.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology, Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 253–82.Google Scholar
Swanborn, P. (1981) Methoden van Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek: Inleiding in ontwerpstrategieën. Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar

7 References

Cambrosio, A., Jacobi, D. and Keating, P. (1993) ‘Ehrlich’s “Beautiful Pictures” and the Controversial Beginnings of Immunological Imagery.’ ISIS 84: 662–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Gombrich, E. H. (1994) Art & Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon (first published 1960).Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1994) ‘Professional Vision.’ American Anthropologist 96: 606–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1995) ‘Seeing in Depth.’ Social Studies of Science 25: 237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1996) ‘Transparent Vision.’ In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, D. N. and Pea, R. D. (1995) ‘Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology.’ The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4: 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (2006) ‘Edward Tufte and the Promise of a Visual Social Science.’ In: Pauwels, Luc (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, Hanover, NH/London: Dartmouth College Press / University Press of New England, pp. 222–65.Google Scholar
Knor-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1998) ‘Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text.’ In: Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. (eds.) Reading Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985a) ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.’ Social Studies of Science 15: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985b) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (eds.) (1998) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. (1992) The Reconfigured Eye. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pasveer, B. (1992) Shadows of Knowledge: Making a Representing Practice in Medicine: X-Ray Pictures and Pulmonary Tuberculosis, 1895–1930. University of Amsterdam: dissertation.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2000) ‘Taking the Visual Turn in Research and Scholarly Communication: Key Issues in Developing a More Visually Literate (Social) Science.’ Visual Sociology 15: 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2002) ‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’ Visual Studies 17(2): 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. D. (1994) ‘Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications.’ Journal of the Learning Sciences 3: 285–99.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, B. (1978) Photographers at Work: A Sociology of Photographic Styles, York/London: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and Bowen, G. M. (1999) ‘Digitizing Lizards: The Topology of “Vision” in Ecological Fieldwork.’ Social Studies of Science 29: 719–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and Bowen, G. M. (2001) ‘“Creative Solutions” and “Fibbing Results”: Enculturation in Field Ecology.’ Social Studies of Science 31: 533–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M. and McGinn, M. K. (1997) ‘Graphing: Cognitive Ability or Practice.’ Science Education 81: 91–106.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W-M., Bowen, G. M. and McGinn, M. K. (1999) ‘Differences in Graph-Related Practices between High School Biology Textbooks and Scientific Ecology Journals.’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 977–1019.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W-M., Bowen, G. M. and Masciotra, D. (2002) ‘From Thing to Sign and “Natural Object”: Toward a Genetic Phenomenology of Graph Interpretation.’ Science, Technology & Human Values 27: 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijder, J. (1989) ‘Benjamin on the Reproducibility and Aura: A Reading of “The Work of Art in the Age of its Technical Reproducibility.”’ In: Smith, G. (ed.) Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History. University of Chicago Press, pp. 158–74.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. (1997) Visual Explanations. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

7 References

Bateman, J. A. (2008) Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. A. (1986) Media Analysis Techniques. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage.Google Scholar
Boradkar, P. (2011) ‘Visual Research Methods in the Design Process.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 150–68.Google Scholar
Coover, R. (2011) ‘Interactive Media Representation.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 619–38.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (2011) ‘Numbers into Pictures: Visualization in Social Analysis.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 688–709.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1973) Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: CCS.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. and Luff, P. (2010) Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. and Tuma, R. (2011) ‘Videography: An Interpretative Approach to Video-recorded Micro-Social Interaction.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 414–30.Google Scholar
Knor-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (1998) ‘Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text.’ In: Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. (eds.) Reading Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artefact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
MacDougall, D. (2011) ‘Anthropological Filmmaking: An Empirical Art.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Innisfree (2011) ‘Expanding Cartographic Practices in the Social Sciences.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 452–73.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret (1963) ‘Anthropology and the Camera.’ In: Morgan, W. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Photography. New York: Greystone Press, pp. 166–84.Google Scholar
Odgers, C. L., Caspi, A., Bates, C. J., Sampson, R. J. and Moffitt, T. E. (2012) ‘Systematic Social Observation of Children’s Neighborhoods using Google Street View: A Reliable and Cost Effective Method.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53: 1009–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Donoghue, D. (2011) ‘Doing and Disseminating Visual Research: Visual Arts-Based Approaches.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 639–52.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2000) ‘Taking the Visual Turn in Research and Scholarly Communication: Key Issues in Developing a More Visually Literate (Social) Science.’ Visual Sociology 15: 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2006) ‘A Theoretical Framework for Assessing Visual Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communications.’ In: Pauwels, L. (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication. Hanover, NH/London: Dartmouth Colled Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2010) ‘Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.’ Sociological Methods & Research 38(4): 545–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J.-M. (1977) Pictorial Communication. Claremont, CA: David Philip.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2011) ‘A Multi-Sensory Approach to Visual Methods.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 602–15.Google Scholar
Rieger, J. (2011) ‘Rephotography for Documenting Social Change.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 132–49.Google Scholar
Rollwagen, J. (ed.) (1988) Anthropological Filmmaking: Anthropological Perspectives on the Production of Film and Video for General Public Audiences. Chur/London: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2006) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Methods, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rouch, J. (1975) ‘The Camera and Man.’ In: Hockings, P. (ed.) Principles in Visual Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J. (2011) ‘Legal Issues of Using Images in Research.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 710–25.Google Scholar
Ruby, J. (1986) ‘The Future of Anthropological Cinema: A Modest Polemic.’ Visual Sociology Review 1: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Moriarty, S., Barbatsis, G. and Kenney, K. (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1960) The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2011) ‘Multimodality and Multimodal Research.’ In: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 549–70.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (eds.) (2000) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×