Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T12:13:41.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Psychology in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

John D. Greenwood
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

The academic discipline of psychology was founded institutionally in Germany at the end of the nineteenth century. It was a natural outgrowth of the progressive German university system, which was hospitable to the development of new disciplines such as linguistics and psychology. Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), who founded scientific psychology in Germany in 1879, the year he set up his experimental laboratory at the University of Leipzig, characterized the new discipline as physiological psychology. This was not because he believed that psychological states and processes must be reductively explained in terms of physiological states and processes, but because he believed that scientific psychology should appropriate the experimental methods that had proved so successful in the development of nineteenth-century German physiology.

Wundt's new experimental program attracted many foreign students, including many Americans, who sought to attain professional qualifications in the new discipline. Having mastered the elements of the new psychology and the structure of the German university system, they returned home to create their own laboratories and PhD programs in psychology.

Wundt's distinctive form of scientific psychology was eventually displaced within Germany as rival programs were created at other German universities. As the twentieth century advanced, German psychology, which faced increasing opposition from the philosophical community, developed into precisely the type of applied discipline that Wundt feared it would become. In a sense, Wundt's fate was like that of the sorcerer's apprentice. In creating a form of scientific psychology based upon laboratory science, he unleashed powerful forces that he was unable to control – forces that, over a few generations, radically transformed the discipline (Danziger, 1990, p. 34).

Psychology in Germany before Wundt

Psychology had been recognized as a distinctive field of inquiry long before the creation of Wundt's laboratory, and academic philosophers in various countries had offered courses in the subject. For example, psychology was offered as a course at Marischal College, Aberdeen, in 1755 under the title Pneumology (Robinson, 1986). Christian Wolff (1679–1754), professor of mathematics at the University of Halle, popularized the use of the term psychology in Europe in the eighteenth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Conceptual History of Psychology
Exploring the Tangled Web
, pp. 236 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ach, N. K. (1905). Uber die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken [On the Will and Thinking]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Nevitt, S. R. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and Oswald Külpe on the institutional status of psychology: an academic controversy in historical context. In Bringmann, W. G. and Tweney, R. D. (Eds.), Wundt Studies: A Centennial Collection. Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt Psychology in German Culture 1890–1967. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, E. and Baumgartner, W. (1991). Brentano: psychology from an empirical standpoint. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: the APA publication manual as a behavioristic rhetoric. In Nelson, J., Megill, A., and McClowsky, D. N. (Eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (1988). Connectionism and rules and representation systems: are they compatible?Philosophical Psychology, 1, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, P. J. (1978). Bibliography of the works of G. E. Müller. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(28), Ms. No. 1669.Google Scholar
Behrens, P. J. (1997). G. E. Müller: the third pillar of experimental psychology. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. T. Jr., Durkin, M., Link, M., Verstal, M., and Acord, J. (1992). Wundt's American doctoral students. American Psychologist, 47, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benussi, V. (1914). Gesetze der inadäquaten Gestaltauffassung [Laws of the inadequate understanding of form]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 32, 396–419.Google Scholar
Binet, A. (1903). L'étude expérimentale de l'intelligence [Experimental Studies of Intelligence]. Paris: Schleichter.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (Ed.) (1970). Language and Psychology: Historical Aspects of Psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1985a). Wilhelm Wundt: psychology as the propaedeutic science. In Buxton, C. E. (Ed.), Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1985b). Shaping a tradition: experimentalism begins. In Buxton, C. E. (Ed.), Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology. New York, NY: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Brentano, F. (1995a). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1874.)Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1995b). Descriptive psychology (Müller, Benito, Trans. & Ed.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1982.)Google Scholar
Bringmann, W. G., Balance, W. D. G., and Evans, R. (1975). Wilhelm Wundt 1832–1920: a brief biographical sketch. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11, 287–297.Google Scholar
Bringmann, W. G., Bringmann, N. J., and Cottrell, D. (1976). Helmholtz und Wundt an der Heidelburger Universität [Helmholtz and Wundt at the University of Heidelberg]. Heidelberger Jahrbücher, 20, 79–88.Google Scholar
Bringmann, W. G., Voss, U., and Ungerer, G. A. (1997). Wundt's laboratories. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Bühler, C. (1922). Das Seelenleben des Jugendlichen [The Mental Life of Young People]. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1908). Antwort auf die von. W. Wundt erhobenen Einwände gegen die Methode der Selbstbeobachtung an experimentell erzeugten Erlebnissen [Response to Wundt's objections to the method of experimental self-observation]. Archiv fur die Gesamte Psychologie, 12, 93–122.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1964). Tatsachen und Probleme zu einer Psychologie der Denkvorgänge [Facts and problems regarding a psychology of thought processes]. Mandler, Translated G. and Mandler, J. M. (Eds.), Thinking: From Association to Gestalt. New York, NY: Wiley. (Original work published 1907.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: The Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1980a). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 241–262.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1980b). Wundt and the two traditions of psychology. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), Wilhelm Wundt and the Making of Scientific Psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. (1980). Wundt before Leipzig. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), Wilhelm Wundt and the Making of Scientific Psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Donders, F. C. (1868). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes]. Tweede Reeks, 2, 92–120.Google Scholar
Drobisch, M. W. (1842). Empirische Psychologie nach naturwissenschaftlicher Methode [Empirical Psychology According to the Methods of Natural Science]. Hamburg: Voss.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving (Lees, L. S., Trans.) Psychological Monographs, 58 (5, Whole No. 270). (Original work published 1935.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis [On Memory]. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1897). Grundzüge der Psychologie [Principles of Psychology]. (Vols. 1–2.) Leipzig: Feit.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1908). An Elementary Textbook of Psychology. (Myer, M., Trans.) Boston, MA: Heath. (Originally published 1902.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. von (1890). Über Gestaltqualitäten [On Gestalt qualities]. Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 14, 242–292.Google Scholar
Fabian, R. (1997). The Graz school of Gestalt psychology. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. (1996). The Roots of Modern Social Psychology 1872–1954. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1882). Revision der Hauptpuncte der Psychophysik [Revision of the Main Points of Psychophysics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf, Härtel.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1966). Elements of Psychophysics. (Adler, H. E., Trans.) New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1860.)Google Scholar
Gilbert, W. (1958). On Magnetism. (Mottelay, P. F., Trans.) New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1600.)Google Scholar
Gundlach, H. (2014). Max Wertheimer, HABILITATION candidate at the Frankfurt Psychological Institute. History of Psychology, 17, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, B. (1991). A review of Ronald Ley's A Whisper of Espionage.Contemporary Psychology, 36, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, M. (1978a). One man against the Nazis – Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, M. (1978b). Gestalt psychology and Gestalt therapy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14, 23–32.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbart, J. F. (1891). A Textbook in Psychology: An Attempt to Found the Science of Psychology on Experience, Metaphysics, and Mathematics. (Smith, M. K., Trans.) New York, NY: Appleton. (Original work published 1816.)Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. (1968). Psychology as a Science Based upon Experience, Metaphysics, and Mathematics. Amsterdam: Bonset. (Original work published 1824–1825.) Selection reprinted from Rand, B. (Ed.) (1912), The Classical Psychologists. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An Introduction to its Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1997). Wilhelm Wundt's “Völkerpsychologie.” In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Judd, C. H. (1926). The Psychology of Social Institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. (1911). Die Erscheinungsweisen der Farben und ihre Beeinflussung durch die individuelle Erfahrung [The modes of appearance of colors]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 7.Google Scholar
Knapp, T. J. (1986). Ralph Franklin Hefferline: the Gestalt therapist among the Skinnerians or the Skinnerian among the Gestalt therapists?Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22, 49–60.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: an introduction to Gestalt theory. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1924). The Growth of the Mind: An Introduction to Child Psychology. (Ogden, R. M., Trans.) New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. [Static and Stationary Physical Gestalts]. Braunschweig: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. (1925). The Mentality of Apes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1917.)Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1938). The Place of Value in a World of Facts. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1940). Dynamics in Psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. and von Restorff, H. (1933). Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld [Analysis of processes in trace fields]. Psychologische Forschung, 18 and 21.Google Scholar
Külpe, O. (1895). Outline of Psychology. (Titchener, E. B., Trans.) New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1893.)Google Scholar
Külpe, O. (1964). The modern psychology of thinking. In Mandler, G. and Mandler, J. M. (Eds. and Trans.), Thinking: From Association to Gestalt. New York, NY: Wiley. (Original work published 1912 in German.)Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S., Chow, K. L., and Semmes, J. (1951). An examination of the electrical field theory of cerebral integration. Psychological Review, 40, 175–188.Google Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (1979). Something old, something new: attention in Wundt and modern cognitive psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 242–252.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahey, T. H. (1981). The mistaken mirror: on Wundt's and Titchener's psychologies. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17, 273–282.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, D. E. (1979). Wundt and after: psychology's shifting relations with the natural sciences, social sciences and philosophy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 231–241.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Ley, R. (1990). A Whisper of Espionage. Garden City Park, NY: Avery.Google Scholar
Lowry, R. (1982). The Evolution of Psychological Theory. (edn.) New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886). Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen [Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations]. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1967). Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempofindungen [Principles of a Theory of Movement Perception]. Amsterdam: E. J. Bonset. (Original work published 1875.)Google Scholar
Marbe, K. (1901). Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchung über das Urteil [Experimental-Psychological Analysis of Judgment]. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. and Orth, J. (1901). Zur Qualitativen Untersuchung der Assoziationen [About the qualitative analysis of sensations]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
Metzger, W. (1965). The historical background to national trends in psychology: German psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 109–115.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meumann, E. (1907). Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die experimentelle Pädagogik und ihre psychologischen Grundlagen. (Vols. 1–2.) [Introductory Lectures on Pedagogy and its Psychological Basis]. Leipzig: Engleman.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (1911). The Fundamental Laws of Human Behavior. Boston, MA: Badger.Google Scholar
Miller, G. E. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, T. (1970). Wundt and the conceptual foundations of psychology. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 31, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyakawa, T. (1981). The Tohoku University Wundtian collection. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17, 299.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1878). Zur Grundlegung der Psychophysik [Fundamentals of Psychophysics]. Berlin: T. Grieben.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1911–1913). Zur Analyse der Gedächtnistätigkeit und des Vorstellungsverlaufes [Analysis of the Processes of Memory and Mental Representation]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1923). Komplextheorie und Gestalttheorie: Ein Beitrag zur Wahrnehmungspsychologie [Structure Theory and Gestalt Theory: A Contribution to the Psychology of Perception]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1964). In defense of association psychology. In Mandler, G. and Mandler, J. M. (Eds.), Thinking: From Association to Gestalt. New York, NY: Wiley. (Original work published 1913 in German.)Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. and Martin, L. J. (1899). Zur Analyse de Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit [An Analysis of Sensitivity to Difference]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. and Pilzecker, A. (1900). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnisses [Experimental contributions to the theory of memory]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1(Suppl.).Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. and Schumann, F. (1889). Ueber die psychologischen Grundlagen der Vergleichung gehobener Gewichte [On the psychological basis of lifted weight comparisons]. Archiv fuer die gesamte Physiologie, 45, 37–112.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. and Schumann, F. (1893). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Untersuchungen des Gedächtnisses [Experimental contributions to the investigation of memory]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 6, 81–190, 257–339.Google Scholar
Newman, E. B. (1944). Max Wertheimer: 1880–1943. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 428–435.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1955). Opticks; or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colors of Light. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1704.)Google Scholar
O'Donnell, J. M. (1985). The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychology experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Osier, D. V. and Wozniak, R. H. (1984). A Centenary of Serial Publications in Psychology, 1850–1950: An International Bibliography. Millwood, NY: Kraus International.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (1880). Principien der Sprachgeschichte [Principles of the History of Language]. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Perls, F., Hefferline, R. F., and Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt Therapy. New York, NY: Dell.Google Scholar
Postman, L. (1968). Hermann Ebbinghaus. American Psychologist, 23, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, D. K. (1987). Wilhelm Wundt and the Establishment of Experimental Psychology, 1875–1914: The Context of a New Field of Scientific Research. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Robinson, D. N. (1986). The Scottish enlightenment and its mixed bequest. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22, 171–177.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollett, B. A. (1997). The Vienna school of developmental psychology. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Appleton–Century–Crofts.Google Scholar
Rubin, E. J. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren [Visually perceived figures]. Studien in Psychologischer Analyse. (Pt. 1.) Copenhagen: Gyldendal. (Original work published 1915.)Google Scholar
Sarris, V. (1997). Gestalt psychology at Frankfurt University. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Scarborough, E. and Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold Lives: The First Generation of American Women Psychologists. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schosberg, H. (1954). Three dimensions of emotion. Psychological Review, 61, 81–88.Google Scholar
Schröder, C. (1997). Wilhelm Wirth and the Psychological Seminar of Leipzig. In Bringmann, W. G., Lück, H. E., Miller, R., and Early, C. E. (Eds.), A Pictorial History of Psychology. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence.Google Scholar
Selz, O. (1922). Zur Psychologie des Produktiven Denkens und des Irrtums [About the Psychology of Productive Thinking and Error]. Bonn: Cohen.Google Scholar
Selz, O. (1964). The revision of the fundamental conceptions of intellectual processes. In Mandler, G. and Mandler, J. M. (Eds.), Thinking: From Association to Gestalt. New York, NY: Wiley. (Original work published 1927.)Google Scholar
Shook, J. R. (1995). Wilhelm Wundt's contribution to John Dewey's functional psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 31, 347–369.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, M. M. (1984). The Gestalt psychologists in behaviorist America. American Historical Review, 89, 1240–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, W. (1902). Zur Psychologie der Aussage [On the psychology of testimony]. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strefrechtswissenschaft, 22, 315–370.Google Scholar
Stern, W. (1914). Die psychologischen Methoden der Intelligenzprüfung: und deren Anwendung an Schulkindren (The psychological methods of testing intelligence). Educational Psychology Monographs, no. 13. (Whipple, G. M., Trans.) (Original work published in German in 1912.)
Stumpf, C. (1883). Tonpsychologie [The Psychology of Tone]. (Vol. 1.) Leipzig: Hitzel.Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. (1890). Tonpsychologie [The Psychology of Tone]. (Vol. 2.) Leipzig: Hitzel.Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. (1930). Autobiography. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A History of Psychology in Autobiography. (Vol. 1.) Worcester, MA: Clark University.Google Scholar
ter Hark, M. (2010). The psychology of thinking before the cognitive revolution: Otto Selz on problems, schemas, and creativity. History of Psychology, 13, 2–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, M. A. (1932). Wundt's doctorate students and their theses, 1875–1920. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 630–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1925). Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watt, H. J. (1904). Experimentelle Beiträge zu einer Psychologie des Denkens [Experimental Contributions to the Psychology of Thinking]. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental studies on the visual perception of motion]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161–265. Reprinted in Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie. Erlangen: Verlag der philosophischen Akademie (1925).Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1938a). The general theoretical situation. In Ellis, W. D. (Ed.), A Sourcebook in Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1922.)Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1938b). Gestalt theory. In Ellis, W. D. (Ed.), A Sourcebook in Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1925.)Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Witasek, S. (1908). Grundlinien der Psychologie [Principles of Psychology]. Leipzig: Dürr.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1732). Psychologia empirica [Empirical Psychology]. Frankfurt: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1734). Psychologia rationalis [Rational Psychology]. Frankfurt: Renger.Google Scholar
Woodward, W. R. (1982). Wundt's program for the new psychology: vicissitudes of experiment, theory, and system. In Woodward, W. R. and Ash, M. G. (Eds.), The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1906). Imageless thought. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 3, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1862). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung [Contributions Toward a Theory of Sense Perception]. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1873–1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Principles of Physiological Psychology]. Leipzig: Englemann.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1894). Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology. (Crighton, J. E. and Titchener, E. B., Trans.) New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1863.)Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1896). Ueber die Definition der Psychologie [About the definition of psychology]. Philosophische Studien, 12, 1–66.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie. (Vol. 1.) Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie. (Vols. 1–10.) Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1902). Outlines of Psychology. (Judd, C. H., Trans.) Leipzig: Engelmann. (Original work published 1897.)Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of Physiological Psychology. (Titchener, E. B., Trans.) (edn.) New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1902–1903.)Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1907). Über Ausfrageexperimente und über die Methoden zur Psychologie des Denkens [About interrogative experiments and the methods regarding the psychology of thinking]. Psychologische Studien, 3, 301–360.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1909). Das Institut für Experimentelle Psychology [The Institute of Experimental Psychology]. In Rektor, and Senat, (Eds.), Festschrift zur Feisser des 500-jährigen-Bestehens der Universität Leipzig. (Vol. 4.) Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1913). Die Psychologie im Kampf ums Dasein. [Psychology Struggling for Survival]. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1916). Elements of Folk Psychology. (Schaub, E. L., Trans.) New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1920). Erlebtes und Erkanntes. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1970). The psychology of the sentence. In Blumenthal, A. L. (Ed. and Trans.), Language and Psychology: Historical Aspects of Psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Wiley. (Original work published 1912.)Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1973). An Introduction to Psychology. New York, NY: Arno Press. (Original work published 1912.)Google Scholar
Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Über Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen [About memory for executed and non-executed actions]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1–95.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Psychology in Germany
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Psychology in Germany
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Psychology in Germany
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.009
Available formats
×