In RISE, TV46000 once monthly (q1m) or once every 2 months (q2m) significantly extended time to impending schizophrenia relapse. The current study (SHINE, NCT03893825) evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and effect of TV46000.

Patients completing RISE without relapse (rollover) or newly recruited (de novo) were eligible. The de novo and placebo rollover cohorts were randomized 1:1 to q1m or q2m for ≤56 weeks; the TV46000 rollover cohort continued assigned regimen. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included time to impending relapse and patient centered outcomes (PCOs) including Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS).

334 patients were randomized and received TV46000 q1m (n=172) or q2m (n=162), for 202.3 patient-years [PY] of TV-46000 treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported for ≥5% of patients were: overall–injection site pain (event rate/100 PY, n [%]; 23.23, 16 [5%]); de novo (n=109)–injection site pain (56.10, 11 [10%]), injection site nodule (16.03, 6 [6%]), blood creatine phosphokinase increased (16.03, 8 [7%]), urinary tract infection (10.69, 7 [6%]); placebo rollover (n=53)–tremor (18.50, 5 [9%]); TV46000 rollover (n=172)–headache (7.97, n=8 [5%]). Serious AEs reported for ≥2 patients were worsening schizophrenia and hyperglycemia. Kaplan– Meier estimates for remaining relapse-free at week 56 were 0.98 (2% risk; q1m) and 0.88 (12%; q2m). SQLS improved for q1m (least-squares mean change [SE], − 2.16 [0.98]) and q2m (− 0.43 [0.98]); other PCOs (5Level EuroQoL 5Dimensions Questionnaire, Personal and Social Performance Scale, Drug Attitudes Inventory 10-item version) remained stable.

TV-46000 had a favorable long-term benefit–risk profile in patients with schizophrenia.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc.

Study Registration Number: NCT03893825

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have demonstrated better rates of adherence among patients with schizophrenia than oral antipsychotics (OAs). While LAIs often cost more than OAs, better adherence can lead to cost offsets in other areas.

The purpose of this LAI Cost-Offset Value Calculator (LCVC) model is to provide an evidence-based model that estimates total costs and total cost offsets for a hypothetical population of adult patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical LAIs relative to second-generation oral antipsychotics (SGOAs) in the United States.

The model was derived based on studies included in a recent meta-analysis of patients who relapsed while taking an SGOA and were either switched to an atypical LAI or continued an SGOA. User inputs to the model include population size and payer archetype. The model then estimates the difference in adherence rates, relapse rates, hospitalizations, hospital days, hospital costs, emergency department (ED) visits, ED costs, and pharmacy costs, as well as cost offsets overall and by source (ie, hospitalization, ED, pharmacy).

In the base case, representing a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adult patients with schizophrenia in the United States and a composite payer archetype, 1-year pharmacy costs were higher for patients who switched to an LAI relative to patients who continued taking an SGOA ($14,561,971 vs $7,203,142). However, cost offsets were observed for other dimensions of direct costs, including lower ED costs ($1,664,808 vs $2,241,483) and substantially lower hospital costs ($23,623,612 vs $44,195,100) due to fewer relapses (409 vs 508). For some payer archetypes (ie, Medicare and Veteran Affairs), the cost offsets completely covered the higher pharmacy costs for LAIs; for others (ie, Commercial and Medicaid), the cost offsets partially covered the higher pharmacy costs for LAIs, though sometimes substantially.

Despite potential higher pharmacy costs for LAIs, this model supports the conclusion that those costs could be mitigated by cost offsets in other areas, with varying results depending on payer archetype. The LCVC model, parameterized using real-world data extracted from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, may be helpful for payers in understanding the potential cost offsets of switching patients with schizophrenia who have relapsed while taking OAs to LAIs. To our knowledge, there are no similar studies for schizophrenia that calculate cost offsets based solely on empirical evidence of patients who failed on OAs.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, including partial or nonadherence, may alleviate knowledge gaps and clarify the role of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents (LAIs) in treating this population.

4 experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely-available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. S.C.O.P.E.™ provides HCPs with considerations in common clinical scenarios met in inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as questions to consider when patients present to the emergency department. The potential usefulness of LAIs is explored in each scenario. Clinical education videos prepare nurse practitioners, social workers, and case managers to address patient concerns and communicate the benefits of LAI treatment. S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia and the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, such as unfamiliarity with prescribing information for long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), may assist clinicians when treating patients with schizophrenia.

Four experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care. S.C.O.P.E.™ also includes supportive elements such as an LAI selector.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. To acquaint HCPs with characteristics of common LAIs used in schizophrenia treatment, S.C.O.P.E.™ offers a selector that filters LAIs by approved indication(s), initiation regimen, reconstitution, dosing strengths and frequency, injection volumes and routes, and supply and storage information based on approved product labels. The LAI selector does not provide LAI safety and efficacy data, so HCPs should visit individual product websites for this information. Therefore, S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia, the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management, and the product characteristics of available LAIs.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Functional recovery is a treatment goal that goes beyond symptomatic remission and encompasses multiple aspects of schizophrenia patients’ lives, including quality of life, physical, and mental functioning. There is evidence that long-acting injectable (LAI) treatments promote adherence and reduce rehospitalisation and functional decline, which could facilitate patients’ ability to reach functional recovery. Despite this, LAIs are underused in the first-episode (FEP) and early-phase (EP) patient population, due to physician hesitancy and concerns around stigma. A Delphi panel was held to gain expert consensus on an approach to the domains and assessment of functional recovery elements in FEP and EP schizophrenia patients.

A literature review and input from a steering committee of 5 experts in psychiatry informed statements development for a three-round modified Delphi process. Round one was conducted via one-to-one video conference interviews, and the successive rounds were conducted via electronic surveys, which enabled international collaboration. Statements on the different domains and assessment for functional recovery were presented to 17 psychiatrists, practicing in 7 countries (France, Italy, US, Germany, Spain, Denmark, and UK), experienced in the treatment of schizophrenia with LAIs. Several analysis rules determined whether a statement could progress to the next round and specified the level of agreement required to achieve consensus. Measures of central tendency (mode, mean) and variability (interquartile range) were reported back to help panelists look at their previous responses in the context of the overall group.

A consensus was reached (defined a priori as ≥80% agreement) on all 27 statements covering the dimensions, assessment, and level of achieved functional recovery for FEP and EP patients. The following domains are important to consider when assessing functional recovery: depression, aggressive behaviour, social interaction, family functioning, education/employment, sexual functioning, and leisure activities. Additionally, panellists reached consensus that dimensions should be minimally impairing, if present (excluding sexual functioning) and asked about at every encounter with the patient (excluding sexual functioning and leisure activities). In summary, this Delphi panel yielded agreement that functional recovery is multidimensional and should be assessed regularly as part of usual care on an individual patient level in FEP and EP schizophrenia patients.

Lundbeck Otsuka Alliance

Schizophrenia is among the top ten causes of years lost due to disability. Goals of treatment are evolving beyond remission of psychotic symptoms to include physical and mental functioning, quality of life, and long-term functional recovery. Evidence has shown long-acting injectables (LAIs) are beneficial for schizophrenia patients by increasing treatment adherence and decreasing relapse and rehospitalisation. This potentially reduces disease progression and facilitates functional recovery. However, LAIs are underused and often seen as a last resort for first-episode (FEP) and early-phase (EP) patients, due to physicians’ lack of familiarity and stigma.

A three-round modified Delphi panel was held to gain expert consensus on an approach to functional recovery in FEP and EP patients with LAIs. A literature review and input from a steering committee of 5 experts in psychiatry informed the development of statements. Round one was carried out via one-to-one video conference interviews, and the subsequent rounds were conducted via electronic surveys, which enabled international collaboration. Delphi panellists were 17 psychiatrists with schizophrenia treatment experience, practicing in 7 countries (France, Italy, US, Germany, Spain, Denmark, and UK). Several analysis rules determined whether a statement could progress to the next round and specified the level of agreement required to achieve consensus. Measures of central tendencies (mode, mean) and variability (interquartile range) of aggregated responses from the previous round were reported to panelists to understand their response in relation to the group.

There was consensus (defined a priori as ≥80% agreement) on the 8 statements relating to long-term treatment goals and LAI links to functional recovery. LAI treatment in FEP and EP patients increases adherence and reduces treatment burden and functional decline compared to the same and other oral medication. Additionally, there was consensus that LAIs lead to better treatment outcome and functional recovery. Other important factors to achieving functional recovery include patient attitude towards treatment and psychoeducation. Furthermore, consensus was reached that functional recovery and quality of life are linked. In summary, this Delphi panel yielded agreement that functional recovery is a reachable goal for FEP and EP patients and can be enhanced using LAIs.

Lundbeck Otsuka Alliance

Psychiatric hospitalization is a major driver of cost in the treatment of schizophrenia. Here, we asked whether a technology-enhanced approach to relapse prevention could reduce days spent in a hospital after discharge.

The Improving Care and Reducing Cost (ICRC) study was a quasi-experimental clinical trial in outpatients with schizophrenia conducted between 26 February 2013 and 17 April 2015 at 10 different sites in the USA in an outpatient setting. Patients were between 18 and 60 years old with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or psychotic disorder not otherwise specified. Patients received usual care or a technology-enhanced relapse prevention program during a 6-month period after discharge. The health technology program included in-person, individualized relapse prevention planning with treatments delivered via smartphones and computers, as well as a web-based prescriber decision support program. The main outcome measure was days spent in a psychiatric hospital during 6 months after discharge.

The study included 462 patients, of which 438 had complete baseline data and were thus used for propensity matching and analysis. Control participants (N = 89; 37 females) were enrolled first and received usual care for relapse prevention followed by 349 participants (128 females) who received technology-enhanced relapse prevention. During 6-month follow-up, 43% of control and 24% of intervention participants were hospitalized (χ2 = 11.76, p<0.001). Days of hospitalization were reduced by 5 days (mean days: b = −4.58, 95% CI −9.03 to −0.13, p = 0.044) in the intervention condition compared to control.

These results suggest that technology-enhanced relapse prevention is an effective and feasible way to reduce rehospitalization days among patients with schizophrenia.

Antipsychotics are widely used in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), but there has been no comprehensive meta-analytic assessment that examined their use as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy.

A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted on randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of antipsychotics for the treatment of adults with MDD. Data of both monotherapy and adjunctive antipsychotic use were extracted, but analyzed separately using a random-effects model. Co-primary outcomes were study-defined-treatment response and intolerability-related discontinuation. We also illustrated the risk/benefit balance of antipsychotics for MDD, using two-dimensional graphs representing the primary efficacy and safety/tolerability outcome. Secondary outcomes included psychopathology, remission, all-cause-discontinuation, inefficacy-related discontinuation, and adverse events.

Forty-five RCTs with 12 724 patients were included in the analysis. In monotherapy (studies = 13, n = 4375), amisulpride [1.99 (1.55–2.55)], sulpiride [1.50 (1.03–2.17)], and quetiapine [1.48 (1.23–1.78)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, intolerability-related discontinuations were significantly higher compared to placebo with amisulpride and quetiapine. In adjunctive therapy (studies = 32, n = 8349), ziprasidone [1.80 (1.07–3.04)], risperidone [1.59 (1.19–2.14)], aripiprazole [1.54 (1.35–1.76)], brexpiprazole [1.41 (1.21–1.66)], cariprazine [1.27 (1.07–1.52)], and quetiapine [1.23 (1.08–1.41)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, of these antipsychotics that were superior to placebo, only risperidone was equivalent to placebo regarding discontinuation due to intolerability, while the other antipsychotics were inferior.

Results suggest that there are significant differences regarding the risk/benefit ratio among antipsychotics for MDD, which should inform clinical care.

The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted care of patients with schizophrenia treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs). This study examined how clinics adapted operations to maintain a standard of care for these patients after pandemic onset.

Online surveys were completed in October-November 2020 by one principal investigator (PI) or PI-appointed designee at 35 clinics participating in OASIS (NCT03919994). Items concerned pandemic impacts on clinic operations, particularly telepsychiatry, and on the care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs.

All 35 clinics reported using telepsychiatry; 20 (57%) implemented telepsychiatry after pandemic onset. Telepsychiatry visits increased from 12%-15% to 45%-69% across outpatient visit types after pandemic onset; frequency of no-show and/or canceled telepsychiatry visits decreased by approximately one-third. Nearly half of clinics increased the frequency of telepsychiatry visits for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Approximately one-third of participants each reported switching patients treated with LAIs to longer injection interval LAIs or to oral antipsychotics. The most common system/clinic- and patient-related barrier for telepsychiatry visits was lower reimbursement rate and access to technology/reliable internet, respectively. Almost all participants (94%) were satisfied with telepsychiatry for maintaining care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs; most predicted a hybrid of telepsychiatry and office visits post-pandemic.

Changes made by clinics after pandemic onset were viewed by almost all participants as satisfactory for maintaining a standard of care for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Most participants predicted continuing telepsychiatry to support patient care post-pandemic; equitable access to telepsychiatry will be important in this regard.

Alkermes, Inc.

Coordinated specialty care (CSC) is widely accepted as an evidence-based treatment for first episode psychosis (FEP). The NAVIGATE intervention from the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode Early Treatment Program (RAISE-ETP) study is a CSC intervention which offers a suite of evidence-based treatments shown to improve engagement and clinical outcomes, especially in those with shorter duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). Coincident with the publication of this study, legislation was passed by the United States Congress in 2014–15 to fund CSC for FEP via a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) block grant set-aside for each state. In Michigan (MI) the management of this grant was delegated to Network180, the community mental health authority in Kent County, with the goal of making CSC more widely available to the 10 million people in MI. Limited research describes the outcomes of implementation of CSC into community practices with no published accounts evaluating the use of the NAVIGATE intervention in a naturalistic setting. We describe the outcomes of NAVIGATE implementation in the state of MI.

In 2014, 3 centers in MI were selected and trained to provide NAVIGATE CSC for FEP. In 2016 a 4th center was added, and 2 existing centers were expanded to provide additional access to NAVIGATE. Inclusion: age 18–31, served in 1 of 4 FEP centers in MI. Data collection began in 2015 for basic demographics, global illness (CGI q3 mo), hospital/ED use and work/school (SURF q3 mo) and was expanded in 2016 to include further demographics, diagnosis, DUP, vital signs; and in 2018 for clinical symptoms with the modified Colorado Symptom Inventory (mCSI q6 mo), reported via an online portal. This analysis used data until 12/31/19. Mixed effects models adjusted by age, sex and race were used to account for correlated data within patients.

N=283 had useable demographic information and were included in the analysis. Age at enrollment was 21.6 ± 3.0 yrs; 74.2% male; 53.4% Caucasian, 34.6% African American; 12.9 ± 1.7 yrs of education (N=195). 18 mo retention was 67% with no difference by sex or race. CGI scores decreased 20% from baseline (BL) to 18 mo (BL=3.5, N=134; 15–18 mo=2.8, N=60). Service utilization via the SURF was measured at BL (N=172) and 18 mo (N=72): psychiatric hospitalizations occurred in 37% at BL and 6% at 18 mo (p<0.01); ER visits occurred in 40% at BL and 13% at 18 mo (p<0.01). 44% were working or in school at BL and 68% at 18 mo (p<0.01). 21% were on antipsychotics (AP) at BL (N=178) and 85% at 18 mo (N=13) with 8% and 54% on long acting injectable-AP at BL and 18 mo, respectively. Limitations include missing data and lack of a control group.

The implementation of the NAVIGATE CSC program for FEP in MI resulted in meaningful clinical improvement for enrollees. Further support could make this evidence-based intervention available to more people with FEP.

Supported by funds from the SAMHSA Medicaid State Block Grant set-aside awarded to Network180 (Achtyes, Kempema). The funders had no role in the design of the study, the analysis or the decision to publish the results.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and unhealthy alcohol use are common yet often unaddressed public health problems in low- and middle-income countries. In a randomized trial, we found that the common elements treatment approach (CETA), a multi-problem, flexible, transdiagnostic intervention, was effective in reducing IPV and unhealthy alcohol use among couples in Zambia at a 12-month post-baseline assessment. In this follow-up study, we investigated whether treatment effects were sustained among CETA participants at 24-months post-baseline.

Participants were heterosexual couples in Zambia in which the woman reported IPV perpetrated by the male partner and in which the male had hazardous alcohol use. Couples were randomized to CETA or treatment as usual plus safety checks. Measures were the Severity of Violence Against Women Scale (SVAWS) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The trial was stopped early upon recommendation by the trial's DSMB due to CETA's effectiveness following the 12-month assessment. Control participants exited the study and were offered CETA. This brief report presents data from an additional follow-up assessment conducted among original CETA participants at a 24-month visit.

There were no meaningful changes in SVAWS or AUDIT scores between 12- and 24-months. The within-group treatment effect for SVAWS from baseline to 24-months was d = 1.37 (p < 0.0001) and AUDIT was d = 0.85 (p < 0.0001).

The lack of change in levels of IPV and unhealthy alcohol use between the 12- and 24-month post-baseline timepoints suggests that treatment gains were sustained among participants who received CETA for at least two years from intervention commencement.