Skip to main content
×
Home
Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gibson, James L. 2016. Reassessing the Institutional Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court: New Evidence, Revised Theory. Politikon, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 53.


    Ura, Joseph Daniel and Flink, Carla M. 2016. Managing the Supreme Court: The Chief Justice, Management, and Consensus. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 185.


    Castle, Jeremiah J. 2015. The Electoral Impact of Public Opinion on Religious Establishment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 54, Issue. 4, p. 814.


    Collins, Todd A. and Cooper, Christopher A. 2015. Making the Cases “Real”: Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Cases 1953–2004. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 23.


    Ginn, Martha Humphries Searles, Kathleen and Jones, Amanda 2015. Vouching for the Court? How High Stakes Affect Knowledge and Support of the Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 163.


    Malhotra, Neil and Jessee, Stephen A. 2014. Ideological Proximity and Support for The Supreme Court. Political Behavior, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 817.


    Ura, Joseph Daniel 2014. Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 1, p. 110.


    Vecera, Vincent 2014. The Supreme Court and the Social Conception of Abortion. Law & Society Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 345.


    Engel, Stephen M. 2013. Frame Spillover: Media Framing and Public Opinion of a Multifaceted LGBT Rights Agenda. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 403.


    Jones, David R. 2013. Do Major Policy Enactments Affect Public Evaluations of Congress? The Case of Health Care Reform. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 185.


    Nelson, Kjersten R. and Ringsmuth, Eve M. 2013. Inter-Institutional Dynamics: Assessments of the Supreme Court in a Separation of Powers Context. Political Behavior, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 357.


    Sill, Kaitlyn L. Metzgar, Emily T. and Rouse, Stella M. 2013. Media Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court: How Do Journalists Assess the Importance of Court Decisions?. Political Communication, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 58.


    MCKENZIE, MARK JONATHAN and UNGER, MICHAEL A. 2011. “New Style” Campaigning, Citizen Knowledge, and Sources of Legitimacy for State Courts: A Case Study in Texas. Politics & Policy, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 813.


    Radmilovic, Vuk 2010. Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec Secession Reference and Beyond. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43, Issue. 04, p. 843.


    Bassok, Or 2009. Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968-1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image. Israel Law Review, Vol. 42, Issue. 02, p. 306.


    Ura, Joseph Daniel 2009. The Supreme Court and Issue Attention: The Case of Homosexuality. Political Communication, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 430.


    GIBSON, JAMES L. 2008. Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and “New-Style” Judicial Campaigns. American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, Issue. 01,


    Ramirez, Mark D. 2008. Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Psychology, Vol. 29, Issue. 5, p. 675.


    HAIDER-MARKEL, DONALD P. and CARR, CAROL K. 2007. The Political Fallout of Taking a Stand: The President, Congress, and the Schiavo Case. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 449.


    Baird, Vanessa A. and Gangl, Amy 2006. Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media's Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness. Political Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 597.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
    • Online ISBN: 9780511509827
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509827
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

In The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion, Valerie Hoekstra looks at reactions to Supreme Court decisions in the local communities where the controversies began. She finds considerable media coverage of these cases and a highly informed local populace. While the rulings did not have a significant impact on how citizens felt about the issues in these cases, the rulings did have an important effect on how citizens felt about the Court. The evidence Hoekstra uses comes from a series of two-wave panel studies conducted prior to and following the Supreme Court's decisions. This book provides important insights into how the public learns about Supreme Court decisions and how support for the Court is incrementally gained and lost as it announces its decisions.

Reviews

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


David Adamany , and B. Grossman Joel . 1983. “Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Law & Policy Quarterly. 5 (October): 405–37

Larry R. Bass , and Dan Thomas . 1984. “The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation: Experimental Tests.” American Politics Quarterly. 12: (July): 335-60

David S. Boninger , K. Berent Matthew , and A. Krosnick Jon . 1995. “Origins of Attitude Importance: Self-Interest, Social Identification, and Value Relevance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68 (January): 61–8

Gregory A. Caldeira 1986. “Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review. 80 (December): 1209–26

Gregory A. Caldeira , and L. Gibson James . 1992. “Etiology of Public Support for the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 36 (August): 635–64

Gregory Casey . 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth.” Law and Society Review. 8 (Spring): 385–41

Jonathan D. Casper 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review. 70 (March): 50–6

Kenneth M. Dolbeare , and E. Hammond Phillip . 1968. “The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 16–30

Robert H. Durr , D. Martin Andrew , and Christina Wolbrecht . 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 44 (October): 768–7

David Easton . 1975. “Reassessment of Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science. 5 (October): 435–5

Roy B. Flemming , and B. Dan Wood . 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (April): 468–98

Roy B. Flemming , John Bohte , and B. Dan Wood . 1997. “One Voice Among Many: The Supreme Court's Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–1992.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (October): 1224–50

Charles Franklin , and C. Kosaki Liane . 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review. 83 (September): 751–71

James L. Gibson 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review. 25 (August): 631–6

James L. Gibson , and A. Caldeira Gregory . 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics. 54 (November): 1120–45

James L. Gibson , A. Caldeira Gregory , and Vanessa Baird . 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 343–58

Anke Grosskopf , and J. Mondak Jeffrey . 1998. “Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly. 51 (September): 633–54

Roger Handberg , and S. Maddox William . 1982. “Public Support for the Supreme Court in the 1970s.” American Politics Quarterly. 10 (July): 333–46

Valerie J. Hoekstra 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Quarterly. 23 (January): 109–29

Valerie J. Hoekstra 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review. 94 (March): 89–10

Valerie J. Hoekstra , and A. Segal Jeffrey . 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (November): 1079–1102

Shanto Iyengar , D. Peters Mark , and S. Kinder Donald . 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-so-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review. 76 (December): 848–58

Dean Jaros , and Robert Roper . 1980. “The United States Supreme Court” Myth, Diffuse Support, Specific Support, and Legitimacy.” American Politics Quarterly. 8 (January): 85–10

Timothy R. Johnson , and D. Martin Andrew . 1998. “The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 299–30

John Kessel . 1966. “Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science. 10 (May): 167–9

Jon A. Krosnick , David Boninger , and Yao Chuang . 1993. “Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (December): 1132–51

Milton Lodge , M. McGraw Kathleen , and Patrick Stroh . “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 83 (June): 399–419

Milton Lodge , R. Steenbergen Marco , and Shawn Brau . 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (June): 309–32

Thomas Marshall . 1988. “Public Opinion, Representation, and the Modern Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 16: 296–31

William Mishler , and S. Sheehan Reginald . 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Counter-majoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 87 (March): 87–101

William Mishler , and S. Sheehan Reginald . 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (February): 169–20

Jeffery J. Mondak 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior. 12 (December): 363–84

Jeffery J. Mondak 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Approval.” American Politics Quarterly. 19 (April): 174–88

Jeffery J. Mondak 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 20 (October): 457–7

Jeffery J. Mondak 1994. Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation. Political Research Quarterly. 47 (September): 675–92

Jeffery J. Mondak , and Shannon Ishiyama Smithey . 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics. 59 (November): 1114–42

Walter F. Murphy , and Joseph Tanenhaus . 1968a. “Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: The Goldwater Campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 31

Walter F. Murphy , and Joseph Tanenhaus . 1968b. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” Law and Society Review. 2 (May): 357–82

Helmut Norpoth , and A. Segal Jeffrey . 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 88 (September): 711–16

David O. Sears 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51 (September): 515–30

James A. Stimson , B. MacKuen Michael , and S. Erikson Robert . 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (September): 543–65

Joseph Tanenhaus , and Murphy Walter . 1981. “Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study.” The Journal of Politics. 43 (February): 24–3

Robert S. Wyer , Robert S. Budesheim , Thomas Lee , and Sharon Shavitt . 1991. “Image, Issues, and Ideology: The Processing of Information about Political Candidates.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61 (October): 533–45

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.