Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:48:47.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nudging is being framed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Richard H. Thaler*
Affiliation:
Chicago Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA thaler@chicagobooth.edu; https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/richard-thaler

Abstract

I make three points. First, the i-frame and s-frame are not helpful frameworks for thinking about behavioral public policy. Second, the authors ignore the role of politics: Policies (and the s-frame) require laws and regulations. Third, the research on retirement savings, which is all about the system, undercuts their claims.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2008). A primer on 401 (k) loans (no. onb08-09). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), 12111254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, J., Mitchell, O. S., Reuter, J., & Zhong, M. (2021). Auto-enrollment retirement plans for the people: Choices and outcomes in OregonSaves (no. w28469). National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar