Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T14:40:30.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving from i-frame to s-frame focus in equity, diversity, and inclusion research, practice, and policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Joyce C. He Open the ORCID record for Joyce C. He [Opens in a new window]  and
Sonia K. Kang
Joyce C. He
Affiliation:
UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA joyce.he@anderson.ucla.edu; joyce-he.com
Sonia K. Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada sonia.kang@utoronto.ca; sonia-kang.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meaningful and long-lasting progress in equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) continue to elude academics, practitioners, and policymakers. Extending Chater & Loewenstein's arguments to the EDI space, we argue that, despite conventional focus on individual-level solutions (i-frame), increasing EDI also requires a systemic focus (s-frame). We thus call for the design, testing, and implementation of multipronged s-frame interventions.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e159
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis, J. M., Mair, J., & Munir, K. (2020). The organizational reproduction of inequality. The Academy of Management Annals, 14, 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D. M., Rebele, R. W., Massey, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Grant, A. M. (2019). The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7778–7783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. The American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J. C., & Kang, S. K. (2021). Covering in cover letters: Gender and self-presentation in job applications. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J. C., Kang, S. K., & Lacetera, N. (2021). Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(42), e2108337118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108337118Google ScholarPubMed
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. K., & Kaplan, S. (2019). Working toward gender diversity and inclusion in medicine: Myths and solutions. In The lancet (Vol. 393(10171), pp. 579–586). Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33138-6Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2018). Lean in messages increase attributions of women's responsibility for gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 974–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., … Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, P. (2019). Diversity has become a booming business. So where are the results? Time. October 10. https://time.com/5696943/diversity-business/Google Scholar
Rivera, L. A., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1097–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. The Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House.Google Scholar