Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T16:05:08.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Skinner's pendulum: A framework for assessing s-frame hope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Cait Lamberton Open the ORCID record for Cait Lamberton [Opens in a new window]
Cait Lamberton*
Affiliation:
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA catlam@wharton.upenn.edu; https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/catlam/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unsatisfied with the effects of behavioral economics’ i-frame, “technology of behavior,” Chater & Loewenstein call for a pendulum swing back to the s-frame, suggesting that such an approach offers a more hopeful path toward societal well-being. In this commentary, I offer a framework to think about this pendulum swing, as well as the scope – and limits – of this hope.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e167
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., … Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, M. P., Lamberton, C., & Walsh, M. (2016). Will I pay for your pleasure? Consumers’ perceptions of negative externalities and responses to Pigovian taxes. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(3), 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine. (2012). (US) Committee on the long-run macroeconomic effects of the aging U.S. population. Aging and the macroeconomy: Long-term implications of an older population. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); December 10, 2012. 7, Saving and Retirement Security. Retrieved February 7, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148839/Google Scholar
Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Duda, J. L. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, K., Morin, R., & Horowitz, J. M. (2019). Looking to the future, public sees an America in decline on many fronts. Pew Research. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/03/21/public-sees-an-america-in-decline-on-many-fronts/Google Scholar
Polivy, J. C., Herman, P., & Mills, J. S. (2020). What is restrained eating and how do we identify it? Appetite, 155, 104820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity (1st ed.). Knopf/Random House.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Penguin.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Health.gov. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://health.gov/our-work/nutrition-physical-activity/physical-activity-guidelines/current-guidelinesGoogle Scholar
Vosgerau, J., Scopelliti, I., & Huh, Y. E. (2019). Exerting self control does not equal sacrificing pleasure. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(1), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar