Book contents
- Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research
- Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Awareness, Salience, and Stereotypes in Exemplar-Based Models of Speech Production and Perception
- 2 Sounding Chinese and Listening Chinese: Awareness and Knowledge in the Laboratory
- 3 Awareness and Acquisition of New Dialect Features
- 4 Processing Grammatical Differences: Perceiving versus Noticing
- 5 What It Means to Be an Outsider: How Exposure to Regional Variation Shapes Children’s Awareness of Regional Accents in Their Native Language
- 6 Towards a Cognitively Realistic Model of Meaningful Sociolinguistic Variation
- 7 Place-Linked Expectations and Listener Awareness of Regional Accents
- 8 Whaddayaknow now?
- 9 Silence as Control: Shame and Self-Consciousness in Sociolinguistic Positioning
- 10 Theorizing Salience: Orthographic Practice and the Enfigurement of Minority Languages
- 11 Sociolinguistic Agency and the Gendered Voice: Metalinguistic Negotiations of Vocal Masculinization among Female-to-Male Transgender Speakers
- Index
- References
4 - Processing Grammatical Differences: Perceiving versus Noticing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research
- Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Awareness, Salience, and Stereotypes in Exemplar-Based Models of Speech Production and Perception
- 2 Sounding Chinese and Listening Chinese: Awareness and Knowledge in the Laboratory
- 3 Awareness and Acquisition of New Dialect Features
- 4 Processing Grammatical Differences: Perceiving versus Noticing
- 5 What It Means to Be an Outsider: How Exposure to Regional Variation Shapes Children’s Awareness of Regional Accents in Their Native Language
- 6 Towards a Cognitively Realistic Model of Meaningful Sociolinguistic Variation
- 7 Place-Linked Expectations and Listener Awareness of Regional Accents
- 8 Whaddayaknow now?
- 9 Silence as Control: Shame and Self-Consciousness in Sociolinguistic Positioning
- 10 Theorizing Salience: Orthographic Practice and the Enfigurement of Minority Languages
- 11 Sociolinguistic Agency and the Gendered Voice: Metalinguistic Negotiations of Vocal Masculinization among Female-to-Male Transgender Speakers
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research , pp. 80 - 103Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Baayen, R. H. 2010. languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics.” R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., and Bolker, B. 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Batterink, L. and Neville, H. J. 2013. The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. Journal of Neuroscience 33(19):8528–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowey, J. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41:282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breadmore, H. L., Krott, A., and Olson, A. C. 2014. Agreeing to disagree: Deaf and hearing children’s awareness of subject-verb number agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(3):474–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresnan, J. and Ford, M. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1):168–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21(1):135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vicenzi, M., Job, R., Di Matteo, R., Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Ciccarelli, L., and Vespignani, F. 2003. Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and Language 85:280–96.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J., Langstrof, C., and Foulkes, P. 2013. Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability: Probing constraints and capabilities. Linguistics 51(2):355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feature 158: Invariant don’t for all persons in the present tense. 2011. in Kortmann, B. and Lunkenheimer, K. (eds.), The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English [eWAVE]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. www.ewave–atlas.org/parameters/158.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. 1993. Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science 1993(4):294–9.Google Scholar
Hanulíková, A., Van Alphen, P. M., Van Goch, M. M., and Weber, A. 2012. When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(4):878–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, B. and Kiesling, S. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., and Woolley, J. D. 1982. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111(2):228–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaschak, M. P. 2006. What this construction needs is generalized. Memory & Cognition 34(2):368–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaschak, M. P. and Glenberg, A. M. 2004. This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:450–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1973. Where do grammars stop? in Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Report of the Twenty-Third Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, pp. 43–88. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T., Baranowski, M., and Nagy, N. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4):431–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loudermilk, B. C. 2013. Cognitive mechanisms in the perception of sociolinguistic variation. PhD dissertation. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Mertz, E. and Yovel, J. 2003. Metalinguistic awareness, in Ostman, J.-O., Veschueren, J., Blommaert, J., and Bulcaen, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 1–26. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nation, K. and Snowling, M. J. 2000. Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics 21:229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., and Bock, K. 1999. Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 41:427–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. 1996. Whaddayaknow: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5:40–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. 2011. The power of language regard – discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia (Special Issue II):9–33.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11:129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1981. The limits of awareness. Texas Working Papers in Linguistics 84:1–30.Google Scholar
Squires, L. 2013. Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2):200–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, L. 2014a. Knowledge, processing, evaluation: Testing the perception of English subject-verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42(2):144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, L. 2014b. Talker specificity and the perception of grammatical variation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(7):856–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staum Casasanto, L. 2009. Experimental investigations of sociolinguistic knowledge. PhD dissertation. Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
Wagoner, S. A. 1983. Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly 18(3):328–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1982. Language knowledge and other dialects. American Speech 57(1):3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11
- Cited by