Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T., and Zanna, Mark P. (eds.). 2005. The Handbook of Attitudes. Malwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Alim, H. Sami and Smitherman, Geneva. 2012. Articulate while Black. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bassili, John N. and Brown, Rick D. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: research, challenges, and theory, in Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T., and Zanna, Mark P. (eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes, pp. 543–74. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bright, William (ed.). 1971. Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Büld, Heinrich. 1939. Sprache und Volkstum im nördlichen Westfalen: Sprachgrenzen und Sprachbewegungen in der Volksmeinung. Emsdetten: H. & G. Lechte.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. New directions in sociolinguistic cognition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):31–9. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/5.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2012. The Implicit Association Test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122(7):53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia, Hay, Jennifer, and Plichta, Bartłomiej. 2011. Experimental speech perception and perceptual dialectology, in Di Paolo, Marianna and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.), Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide, pp. 149–62. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cross, Jeremy. 2002. “Noticing” in SLA: Is it a valid concept? TESL-EJ 6(3), retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej23/fromed.html. 8 February 2014.Google Scholar

Devine, Patricia G. 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., and Howard, A. 1997. The nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33:510–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., and Williams, C. J. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bonafide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:1013–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graff, David, Labov, William, and Harris, Wendell A. 1986. Testing listeners’ reactions to phonological markers of ethnic identity: A new method for sociolinguistic research, in Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 53, pp. 45–58. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoenigswald, Henry. 1966. A proposal for the study of folk-linguistics, in Bright, William (ed.), Sociolinguistics, pp. 16–26. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1971. Response to Hoenigswald, in Bright, William (ed.), Sociolinguistics, p. 26. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an Accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loudermilk, Brandon. 2015. Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation, in Prikhodkine, Alexei and Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Language Attitudes: Variability, Processes and Outcomes. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1986. A distributed model of human learning and memory, in McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2, pp. 170–215. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley and Preston, Dennis R. (guest eds.). 1999. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1) (Special Issue: Attitudes, perceptions, and linguistic features).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 1999. Authority in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables, in Milroy, Lesley and Preston, Dennis R. (guest eds.). Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis R. 1997. Family values, in Eliasson, S. and Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.), Language and Its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen, pp. 131–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis R. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis R. 2003. Folk Linguistics (rev. pbk edn.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis R. 2009. Folk linguistics, in Coupland, Nik and Jaworski, Adam (eds.), The New Sociolinguistics Reader, pp. 356–373. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pantos, Andrew J. and Perkins, Andrew W. 2013. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1):3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasquale, Michael and Preston, Dennis R. 2013. The folk linguistics of language teaching and learning, in Drozdział-Szelest, K. and Pawlak, M. (eds.), Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Second Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 1–11. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Plichta, Bartłomiej. 2004. Interdisciplinary perspectives on the Northern Cities Chain Shift. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Polle, Freidrich. 1889. Wie denkt das Volk über die Sprache? Gemeinverständliche Beiträge zur Beanwortung dieser Frage. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan and Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1982. Perceptual dialectology: Mental maps of United States dialects from a Hawaiian perspective, in Preston, D. R. (ed.), Working Papers in Linguistics (University of Hawai‘i Linguistics Department) 14 (2):5–49.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1985. Southern Indiana perceptions of “correct” and “pleasant” speech, in Warkentyne, Henry J. (ed.), Methods V/Méthodes V: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, pp. 387–411. Victoria, BC: Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1993. The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(2):181–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1994. Content-oriented discourse analysis & folk linguistics. Language Sciences 16(2):285–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996a. “Whaddayaknow?”: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5(1):40–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996b. Where the worst English is spoken, in Schneider, Edgar (ed.), Focus on the USA, pp. 297–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1998. Why we need to know what real people think about language. The Centennial Review XLII(2):255–84.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1999a. Discourse interaction and content: A test case. SKY Journal of Linguistics 12:145–75.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) 1999b. Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2005. What is folk linguistics? Why should you care? Lingua Posnaniensis 47:143–62.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010a. Methods in (applied) folk linguistics: Getting into the minds of the folk. AILA Review 24:15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2010b. Variation in language regard, in Zeigler, E., Gilles, P., and Scharloth, J. (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation (für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag), pp. 7–27. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production, in Proceedings of the conference on Production, Perception, Attitude. Leuven, 2–3 April 2009. Dialectologia (Special Issue II, Speelman, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan, and Nerbonne, John (eds.)):9–33. www.publicacions.ub.es/revistes/dialectologiaSP2011/.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Variation in language regard, in Prikhodkine, Alexei and Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Language Attitudes: Variability, Processes and Outcomes. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Prikhodkine, Alexei and Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2015. Language Attitudes: Variability, Processes and Outcomes. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Milton J. 1968. Hedonism, inauthenticity, and other goads toward expansion of a consistency theory, in Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., and Tanenbaum, P. H. (eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency, pp. 279–349. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar

Rosseel, Laura, Geeraerts, Dirk, and Speelman, Dirk. 2014. Auditory affective priming: Exploring new methods to measure attitudes to language varieties, a paper presented to the International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, Groningen, the Netherlands, 15 August.Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments on nonnative English speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4):511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1995. Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness, in Schmidt, Richard (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Technical Report No. 9), pp. 1–64. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar

Sibata, Takesi. 1971. Kotoba no kihan ishiki. Gengo Seikatsu 236:14–21, May (Special Issue: Words that bother us). (The quotation and page reference are taken from the translation ‘Consciousness of language norms,’ Chapter 22 in T. Kunihiro, Fumio Inoue, and Daniel Long (eds.), 1999, Takesi Sibata: Sociolinguistics in Japanese Contexts, pp. 373–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The limits of awareness, Sociolinguistic working paper no. 84. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael, 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staum Casasanto, Laura. 2012. I trust you implicitly … but not explicitly! How to get language attitudes without asking. A paper presented to the International Symposium ‘Variation of Language Attitudes: Mechanisms and Stakes.’ Lausanne, April.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Twilfer, Daniela. 2010. Dialektgrenzen im Kopf: Der westfälische Sprachraum aus volkslinguistischer Perspektive (Westfälische Beiträge zur niederdeutschen Philologie 13). Gütersloh: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of linguistic change, in Lehmann, Winfred F. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, pp. 95–188. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Wilton-Franklin, Antje and Stegu, Martin (issue eds.). 2010. AILA Review 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar