Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T21:02:36.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

79 - Policy/Procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Rade B. Vukmir
Affiliation:
Critical Care Medicine Associates
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Institute of Medicine. Crossing The Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. The Six Domains of Health Care Quality (Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Wetland, DE. Why use clinical pathways rather than practice guidelines? Am J Surg. 1997;174(6):592595. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00196-7.Google Scholar
Farquhar, CM, Kofa, EW, Slutsky, JR. Clinician’s attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2002;177(9):502506.Google Scholar
Shekelle, PG, Ortiz, E, Rhodes, S, Morton, SC, Eccles, MP, Grimshaw, JM, Woolf, SH. Validity of the agency for healthcare research and quality clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2001;28(12):14611467. DOI:10.1001/jama.286.12.1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnick, DW, Hendricks, AM, Brennan, TA. Can practice guidelines reduce the number and costs of malpractice claims? JAMA. 1991;266(20):28562860. DOI:10.1001/jama.1991.03470200068037.Google Scholar
Moses, RE, Feld, AD. Legal risks of clinical practice guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(1):711. DOI:10.1111/j.1572–0241.2007.01399.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyams, AL, Brandenberg, JA, Lipsitz, SR, Shapiro, DW, Brennen, TA. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(6):450455. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-122–6-199503150-00008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washington v. Washington Hosp. Center, 579 A.2d 177 (1990).Google Scholar
Meek v. Shepard, 484 A.2d 579, 580 (D.C. 1984).Google Scholar
Levine v. Rosen, 532 Pa.512. (1992).Google Scholar
Jones v. Chidester, 531 Pa. 31 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore v. Baker, 989 F.2d. 1129 (1993).Google Scholar
Frakes v. Cardiology Consultants, 597 (Tenn Ct App 1997).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×