Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T15:56:26.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

98 - Telemedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Rade B. Vukmir
Affiliation:
Critical Care Medicine Associates
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, MA, Chanda, R, Smith, RD. How is telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India. Global Health. 2011;17:17. DOI:10.1186/1744-8603-7-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, F. More patients with minor injuries could be seen by telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(3):132134. DOI:10.1258/jtt.2008.003009.Google Scholar
Eron, L. Telemedicine: the future of outpatient therapy? Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(S2):S224S230. DOI:10.1086/653524.Google Scholar
Eron, L, King, P, Marineau, M, Yonehara, C. Treating acute infections by telemedicine in the home. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(8):11751181. DOI.10.1086/424671.Google Scholar
Karnofsky, DA, Abelmann, WH, Craver, LF, Burchenal, JH. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma, with particular reference to bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer. 1948;1(4):634656.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCue, MJ, Mazmznian, PE, Hampton, CL, Marks, TK, Fisher, EJ, Parpart, F, et al. Cost-minimization analysis: a follow-up study of a telemedicine program. Telemed J. 1998;4(4):323327. doi10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(1):117. DOI:10.1258/1357633011936075.Google Scholar
Ekeland, AG, Bowes, A, Flottoro, S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736771. DOI:10.1016/ijmedinf.2010.08.006.Google Scholar
Darkins, A. The management of clinical risk in telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2 (4):179184. DOI:10.1258/1357633961930022.Google Scholar
Loane, M. A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(2):6371. DOI:10.1258/1357633021937479.Google Scholar
Lott, CM. Legal interfaces in telemedicine technology. Mil Med. 1996;161(5):280283.Google Scholar
Sao, D, Gupta, A, Gantz, DA. Legal and regulatory barriers to telemedicine in the United States: public and private approaches toward health care reform. Chapter 20 in: The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues, ed. Cohen, I. Glenn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 359380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatrieux, G, Quantin, C, Allaert, FA. Watermarking as a traceability standard. In: Quality of Life Through Quality of Information, ed. Mantas, J. et al. (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2012), pp. 761765. DOI:3233/978-1-61499-101-4-761.Google Scholar
United States v. Quinones, 536 F. Supp.2d 267 (2008).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. §§841, 846. Prohibited Acts, Attempt and Conspiracy.Google Scholar
20 L.P.R.A. §6001: Telemedicine Act.Google Scholar
Perez v. Hoblock, 368 F.3d 166, 175. 2d Cir. (2004).Google Scholar
Hageseth v. Superior Court of San Mateo County, 59 Cal. Rptr.3d 385 (2007).Google Scholar
International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945).Google Scholar
California Business and Professions Code §2290.5, subd (a) (1) Telemedicine Development Act of 1996.Google Scholar
California Business and Professions Code §2060: Legal Medical Consultation with Doctors Outside California.Google Scholar
MacDonald v. Schriro, No. CV 04-1001-PHX-SMM (MHB). Arizona. July 17, 2008.Google Scholar
42 U.S. Code §1983, Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.Google Scholar
USA v. Maye, No. 08-CR-194S. New York. April 23, 2014.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×